the Peac Movemente as I, said ha, ad muc wideh objectivr e
Transcript of the Peac Movemente as I, said ha, ad muc wideh objectivr e
20959. MR. LI3BENBERG
the Peace Movement, as I said, had a much wider objective
than mere National liberation - mere defeat of the present
government; they were working towards a much wider goal
and in that respect, my lords, they did approve of every-
thing that was done by the Liberation Movement? they
harnessed all the support they could get, but their objec-
tive was, as I say, on a wider world sphere where final
victory for Communism would be assured.
Now, my lords, when one sees the activities
of the Peace Council in this light, then my submission is
that there cannot be any question about the close link
between the Peace Council and the National Liberation
struggle in South Africa. There cannot be any question
about its approval of the methods to be followed. I shall
deal with that later, but it was linked closely to that
and it was trying to influence the Liberation Movement
where it could for that wider objective that it had in
mind.
My lords, as far as the participation in
the activities and its support for the Congress of the
People Campaign is concerned, I would like to refer your
lordships first of all to a document E.106(A) which is
a printed Transvaal Peace Council circular, entitled
"Transvaal Peace Council", with the name of L. Levy typed
in as secretary. Now, at page 1923, line 21 to 27,
it says "The Secretariat has decided to send an observer
to the Congress of the People and to have a Peace
exhibition. (b) Document A.249 entitled "Documents of
Organisation with which I dealt with yesterday, my lords;
at page 1867 it deals with the draft report prepared by
the Peace Council on questions of policy and organisation.
20960. MR. LISBENBERG
On page 913 line 18 to 22 it refers to the Congress of
the People Campaign and the need for peace in the Freedom
Charter.
Then, document E .26(A) is a typed letter of
the South African Peace Council dated 24-/9/55, addressed
to the Transvaal Peace Council, the Natal Peace Council
and the Cape Town Peace Council. At page 1866, line 7
to 25, it refers to their special tasks to see that
peace becomes an integral part of the Freedom Charter.
Then E.336 which is a South African Peace Council letter
dated 10th October, 1954, addressed to the Provincial
Peace Councils; at page 2235, line 12 to 15, it mentions
that a set of notes to guide peace workers in relation
to the Congress of the People has been prepared and would
be sent to them.
Then fifthly, my lords, document E.35(A) which
is a Capetown Peace Council letter dated 9th November,
1954, addressed to the South African Peace Council, and
signed by Sonia Bunting. In this connection I would
like to mention for your lordship's information that Mrs.
Joseph at page 14303 said that this document was a cor-
rect reflection of the Peace Council's attitude towards
the Congress of the People.
Now, at page 1870, line 4 to 20 it states
that the opportunity created by the Congress of the People
Campaign was being used to spread the idea of peace.
Then, my lords, attached to that letter were
a few letters in this exhibit; the second letter is dated
20th February, 1954, addressed to the South African Peace
Council and signed by S. Bunting, secretary; at page
1869, line 27 to 30, it says that the Capetown Peace
20961. MR. LIEBENBERG-
Council is represented on the Congress of the People 1
Action Council . . .
BEKKER J; On the top of page 3, you start
"See 2(b) (c) letter? . Is that the same as E.35(A)
MR. LIEBEHBERG-; Yes, that is what I was trying
to explain, my lord, E35(A) consists of a number of let -
ters. Mrs. Joseph identified the first one, the second
one I referred to - she didn't say anything about that,
but my submission is that that shows what it says, that
the Capetown Peace Council is represented on the Action
Council of the Congress of the People in the Cape. 10
Then, my lords . . .
BEKKER J; Does the letter say exactly what form
the representation took?
MR. LIEBENBERG % It just mentions the fact that
this Cape Town Peace Council was represented. That's all 15
it says, my lords.
BEKKER J; Yes .
MR. LIEBENBERGs My lords, I would now draw
attention to the fact that in the possession of the Peace
Council were found E,24, "The World We Live In" , at page
1865; E .25 , "Change is Needed", record page 1865? my
submission is that the possession by the South African
Peace Council of these lectures shows a knowledge of the
type of State aimed at by the Congress alliance.
My lords, I have this paragraph entitled
"Admissibility of documents" which shows just where
these documents were found. I do not propose to read
that to your lordships.
Then I turn to Section "E " , in further sup-
port of the previous submissions, my lords, and my submission
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
is that the South African Peace Council subscribed to
the view that the world was divided into two blocks,
the Capitalist and the Communist blocks; that the
Socialist revolution was in progress in Asia . . .
BERBER; The Socialist or social. . . .
MR. LIEBENBERG; A social, my lord5 it uses
the word 'social'. That a social revolution wasin pro-
gress in Asia against land tenure; described as the old
landlords system which was so easily overthrown in China,
and is being overthrown in Indo-China and Malaya. This
Social Revolution is further described as one against the
form of economic exploitation eagerly watched by the ex-
ploited masses in South Africa, and my submission is
that this speech was made by Guy Ralph (?) at the Inaugural
Conference of the South African Peace Council on, accord-
ing to the record, page 833Q line 28 - to 8331? line 29 -
the witness, my lords, was D/H/Constable van Papendorp,
and my submission is that this speech made again on the
platform of the South African Peace Council, and obviously
Guy Ralph was there as a supporter of the Peace Movement,
shows that the Peace Council's attitude - - well, may
I frame it in another way, my lords - - this speech goes
a long way towards showing the line of the Peace Council
- what type of State it would find acceptable, and clearly
in my submission, my lords, it shows an anti-Capitalist
and pro-Communist . . . .
BEKKER Jt Did the spsker use the words
"The Capitalist and the Communist blocks"?
MR. LIEBENBERG; No, my lord, that is my
submission; I submit that that is to be inferred from
that portion of the speech which says that a Social
209 68, ME. LIEBENBERG
Revolution was in progress in Asia . . . 1
MR. MAISELS (interrupts) (inaudible).
MR. LIEBENBERG-; I am indebted to my learned
friend. My lords, the idea of the division of the world
appears from A»248, the document entitled "The Peace
movement and the Congress of the People", record page 5
904, line 21 to 26, which states that the victories of
the peace movement were not won without a most difficult
struggle against those circles who were determined to
maintain the cold war and increase the division of the
world into hostile groups, and that the reactions of 10
people everywhere prevented the United States from using
bombs in Korea.
Then on page 905, line 27 to line 32, a
passage from the same document,my lords, reveals approval
for the proposal put forward by the U.S.S.R. for the 15
European Security Conference. My submission is that
these passages reveal an anti-Western and pro-U.S.S.R*
attitude.
Then I come to a document, my lords, E.80
which is a typed document, "Peace activities in Natal"
which was handed in at the record page 1919. Now it
has no author, it has no date, my lords, but it is in
my submission what it purports to be, namely news of
peace activities in Natal, and, inter alia, in the body
of the document is contained the report to which I make
reference here, that Mr. Seedat who was a member of the
Natal Peace Council - he was an executive member and had
passed the resolution at the Natal Indian Congress -
judging from the evidence which will emerge under his
name in the column which deals with the membership of
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
these people - - it will show that he was the person who
was the liaison officer, as it were, between the Natal
Peace Council and the South African Peace Council, who
submitted reports on peace activities in Natal, and he in
my submission as a matter of fact, my lords, - - I wanted
to refer to EAT(a) as an example of a report that he sub-
mitted to the Transvaal and Natal Peace Councils. My
submission, my lords, is that the Court cansafely regard
this report as an authentic expression of the line of the
Peace Council, and it is found in the office of the S.A.
Peace Council, and it deals with that resolution moved by
Seedat at the Natal Indian Congress on World Peace - -
BEKKER J: You see, there is evidence to show
that this person Seedat did move a resolution at the Natal
Indian Congress.
MR. LIEBENBERGs My lords, I did not check that.
I'm not sure that we have the evidence available because
your lordships will see it doesn't mention the date of
this meeting, so that I can check for instance on meetings
of evidence of meetings of the Natal Indian Congress, but..
BEKKER Js Well, if you come across such refer-
ence let us have it.
MR. LIEBELBERG° I will give it to your lord-
ships. My lords, as I have already said Seedat was a
member of the Natal Peace Council - evidence of D/H/Const.
Truter at page 8712; D/Sgt. van Staaden at 8714 shows
that he was a member, and of D/H/Constable van Papendorp
at pahe 8328 shows that he attended the S.A,Peace Council
Inaugural Conference in Johannesburg.
Now, my lords, it was further the view of
this Council that the government of South Africa was part
20965. MR. LIEBEBBERG
ofthe War camp and system of military alliance, and an
ally of those bent on crushing the liberation and inde-
pendence movements, and preparing for war. That appears
from the document A.248, the Peace Movement and the Con-
gress of the People, page 908 line 20 to 24; and I also
refer with respect to Mrs. Helen Joseph's evidence on
page 14320, line 15 to 22, in which she said that it was
the Peace Council's view that South Africa was associated
with the West.
Then Mrs. Joseph's evidence on page 14292, line
24 to 30, and 14293, line 20 to 28, confirms that the
S.A.Peace Council regarded Russia as a country genuinely
working for peace, while the United Ststtes of America and
Great Britain were not regarded as such, and in passing
I might just mention that here, too, she expressed the
view of the Peace Council, that the Imperialists, that
Imperialism was the possible cause of war. Your lord-
ships will remember in paragraph C„4 yesterday I gave a
reference which was not in point,
I now proceed to Section F, my lords, "That in
the events in the International Sphere the S.A. Peace
Council condemns Imperialism, and Colonialism and its
maintenance by force, and I refer with respect to the
speech of Ruth First which is contained in E.62, report
of the South African Peace Council Conference of the
21st to the 2 3rd August, 1953, at page 1910, line 1 to
25. My lords, I can assure your lordships that I've
checked these references and all these speeches that I've
mentioned in sub-paragraphs ( i ) ( i i ) and ( i i i ) relate to
the statement that I've made, that the Peace Council con-
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
demned Imperialism and Colonialism, and its maintenance
by force. Especially do I refer to the evidence of
Mrs. Joseph about this . . .
RUMPFF J; Was she then speaking on the S.A.
Peace Council . .
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord; it may be con-
venient at this stage, my lords, to say that I did go
through the evidence in the time at my disposal - I
wanted to find certain references in her evidence, and I
was unable to do so, so that I shall confine myself to
giving your lordships references to her evidence which
relates to the S.A.Peace Council.
Now the second submission, my lords, is that the
S.A.Peace Council supported the Liberation struggle in
Korea, Kenya, Indo-China, "Vietnam and Malaya, and condemned
the violence used by the Foreign powers to oppress the
movement in question. We submit that the S.A.Peace
Council acted in this manner with the following objectss
(a) To show solidarity with the peoples in
those countries? (b) to use the facts of those struggles
as examples to the Liberation Movement in South Africa
and (c) to emphasise by implication the need for violent
action by the Liberation Movement in South Africa to
achieve liberation . . .
RTJMPFP Js That is your submission?
MR. LIEBENBERGs Those are my submissions, my
lords.
RUMPFE J; Yes.
MR. LIEBENBERG s Now the first document in
support of those submissions is E.44 which is a type-
written document entitled "Transvaal Peace Council -
/ 20967. MR. LIEBENBERG
Discussion Notes on the Peace policy," and it's undated. l
On page 1893, line 13 to 1894, line 1, it states the
connection between war and the Colonial system and men-
tions Korea, Malaya, Vietnam, as countries where war is
already raging. It also relates to the struggle of the
non-Europeans for freedom to the struggle for world peace, 5
and states that the Liberation Movement in South Africa
can be the means of mobilising the masses in the worldwide
struggle against the warmongers.
Now here in my submission appears support for
the submission I made earlier, that the Peace Council wanted 10
to use the National Liberation struggle in South Africa
as a link with that world wide struggle against Imperialism,
working towards its main objectives.
And E.35A, my lorda, a roneoed circular issued
by - entitled "Cape Town Peace Council - addressedto 15
Dear Friend" - - it is dated the 16th July, 1954, bearing
the name of S.B.Bunting as the secretary. At page 1870,
line 29 to 1871 line 11, it refers to the threat of world
war due to determination of Imperialist states to suppress
the attempts of Colonial peoples to win self government.
It mentions the agonies - I quote this - "The agonies of
Korea" - I quote again - "The tragic events in Korea and
Malaya, the heroism of the Vietnamese", which events show
the closeness of the link between peace and liberation.
It contains the following passage, I quotes
"In helping the people of other countries who are contend-
ing against the forces of Imperialist aggression, we in
South Africa who are struggling for our own liberation
v/ill help ourselves." And I submit, my lords, this is
a very important statement, because in expressing admira-
209 68, ME. LIEBENBERG
tion for the heroism of the Vietnamese who are engaged
in physical combat, linking their struggle with the
Liberatoiy struggle in South Africa. The readers, the
general masses, the public, were clearly urged to follow
the example of those people.
And, my lords, I may just mention this, that
this document, circular on page 1871, line 12, ends with
an invitation to a Conference to be held in the City Hall
in Cape Town on the 8th August, on the subject of War
and National liberation, so it shows in my submission
without any doubt that the Peace Council was using the
struggles in those countries for a definite purpose,
to show the people in South Africa how they can conduct
their struggle.
My lords, then I come to a document E.39
"Imperialist threat to peace in Africa", and this document
is familiar to your lordsnips because its value was dis-
cussed when we dealt with the argument on Communist dogma.
This document was found in the office of the Peace Council
in a typed form as well as in a manuscript form - the
two forms of this document, - and it bears no date or no
indication of the author, but my submission is that if
one analyses the contents of this document and one com-
pares that with the rest of the evidence relating to the
S.A.Peace Council, with the other expressions of points
of view, which in my submission is a safe guide I'm
not suggesting itrs the only guide but it is a safe guide
to judge on the validity of a document - on the part it
played in determining the policy of the organisation.
Now if one looks for instance at the speech to which I
have referred at the Inaugural Conference of Guy Ralph
t 20969 MR, LIEBENBERG
where he spoke of the social revolution in China, and 1
where the system of land tenure was overthrown, if one
looks at the speech of Hilda Watts on that same occasion,
where she spoke against Capitalists and the Capitalist
Maniacs, if one looks at the speech of Thompson on the
2nd August, 1954 > where he spoke of the setback the 5
United States received in China, and the speech of Kathrada
on that same occasion - that is the 2nd August, 1954 -
also lauding the successful struggle against Imperialism
in China then, my lords, I submit that this document
can safely be taken as an indication of the line of the 1 0
Peace Council, and it deals with a topic, with a matter
which very closely concerns the South African Peace
Council.
BEKKER J: Does it take it any further than these
other people have already taken it?
MR. LIEBENBERG; My lords, in the sense that
I would say that it 's realljr a repetition of what the
others had said; it 's more in concise form because it
deals with the social revolution in China.
BEKKER J; All we know, as presently advised}
of E .39 , is that it is a typed copy, a manuscript copy
found in the offices of the Peace Council without any-
thing to suggest that it was acted on or that it was
published; that is all we knowc
MR. LIEBENBERG; That is so, my lord. I did
put this document to Mrs. Joseph but she said that she
was out of the offices of the Peace Council and she
didn't know.
RUMPEP J; It has a heading, has it? "Imperial
ist threat to peace".
20970. MR. LIEBENBERG
MR. LIEBENBERG % That is so, my lords. My lords,
I submit it does give an indication that being found in
the offices of the S.A.Peace Council goes some way towards
showing it is concerned with the activities of this Peace
Council. It would have been a different matter, my
lords, in my submission,if this document had been found
elsewhere; but being found in the offices of the Peace
Council . . . .
My lordss I was giving your lordships the other
references to other speeches, the other documents which
contain the same theme as in this; I may briefly say that
this document really relates to the establishment of the
Socialist governments of China, North Korea, to the fact
that Capitalism is forced to fight desperately for its
survival in Malaya, Indo-China and in many more countries
and the surging tide of National liberation indicated that
Colonial exploitation was rapidly drawing to an end, and
that the people of Asia rejected Imperialism.
I submit, my lords, that the inference is
again here that a favouring - I can put it no higher than
that - a favouring of revolution against Imperialism, and
favouring the ejection of Imperialism forcibly.
My lords, then I wish to turn to E .9 , which
is a typed Minutes of the South African Peace Council
meeting on the 28th November, 1953. I see I have omitted
reference to the record - that is page 1856, line 21 to
26, my lords, one of the resolutions of the Peace Council
condemning the cruel and indiscriminate manner in which
hostilities are being waged in Kenya and calling for an
end to this futile and barbaric war.
E. 40, my lords, a roneoed document entitled
209 68, ME. LIEBENBERG
"Africa for Peace" - and there I would like to refer to
Mrs. Joseph's evidence on page 14312 where she gave a
summary of this document, portions of this document and
said that a certain passage was the view of the Peace
Council; that really related to the military action of
Sovereign States against dependent territories, being
as much war as the conflict between States, and she came
back to this document on page 14841 when she identified
it as a South African Peace Council document from its
context. Page 14841, my lords.
My lords, on page 1888, line 2 to line 25 there
is a passage which demands an end to the war in Kenya
and justifies the revolt in Kenya, and I quoteL "As
the natural human revolt against misery and poverty and
especially having such iniquities imposed by foreign
domination".
E. 62, my lords, Report of the Eirst South
African Peace Council Conference, the speech of Ruth
Eirst on page 1910, line 1 to 27, which condemns the
forcible Colonial rule in Malaya, Kenya and Korea. Here
I may indicate, my lords, that Mrs. Joseph stated that
this speech of Ruth First's represented the policy of
the South African Peace Council, and she said that at
page 14298, line 20.
Then, my lords, I wish to refer to a document
E.77, a typed document entitled "Cape Peace Council's
statement of Aims", stating that the Peace Council con-
siders Colonial slavery and Imperialist aggression as
causes of War, and demands the withdrawal of troops from
Indo-China, Malaya and elsewhere.
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
Then I refer to a document H.12 entitled
"There is no freedom without peace" issued by, or pur-
ported to have been issued by the South African Peace
Council. My lords, I may indicate here that this docu-
ment H.12 was seized by H/Constable van Papendorp at
the KLiptown Congress of the People on the 26th June,
1955. That appears from page 1972 of the record, but
I would like to say that it is the same as PD.48, my
lords, which was found on the same occasion at the Klip-
town Congress of the People on the 26th June, 1955, by
Sgt. Sauerman of the Cape. Now, Sonia Bunting was a
member of the South African Peace Council. That appears
- the fact of the finding of this document - appears at
page 4570 of the record, my lords, and I submit that
this document can safely be used as a Peace Council
document. . .
RUMPFF Jt Why do you say it is a South African
Peace Council document?
MR. LIEBENBEBG Because, my lords, it is a hand-
bill ; on it it says "Statement issued by the South
African Peace Council", and then, my lords . . .
RUMPFF J; Yes, alright.
MR. LIEBENBERG; Now this document, which is
read into the record at page 1981, line 1 to 15? demands
the immediate ending of the brutal wars in Malaya and
Kenya, with the recognition of the rights of the people.
Then I refer to a document C.110, a South
African Peace Council Bulletin dated July, 1954, which
was found by D/H/Constable van Papendorp on the 27th
September, 1955» in the offices of the South African
Congress of Democrats, in the presence of Yetta Barenblatt
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
- that appears at page 1513 of the record. Now, my 1
lords, this document is a South African Peace Council
Bulletin; it's entitled "South Africans for peace".
It contains the following passage on page 1623, line 30
to 1624, line 6. It poses the question why the people
of Kenya have teen resisting the heavily armed forces 5
of the British Government and states that the answer was
to be found inter alia in poverty, racialism and oppres-
sion suffered by the people' then I quote "These are
the reasons why the Kenya people are to-day struggling
courageously against British troops in a war started by 10
the British Government to make Kenya safe for the monopolies
of European settlers, and as a future war base." It is
submitted that the implication in this article is that
i f the Kenya people could struggle courageously gainst
fearful odds, then the non-European masses in South 15
Africa who are also suffering, according to its point of
view, should do likewise.
My lords, I submit that this affords a very good
illustration of the atticude of the Peace Council.
Nov/ I come to certain passages of Mrs.Joseph's
evidence, my lords, and the only one I wish to refer
your lordships to is the one that appears at page 13949
of the record where she was speaking on all the Congress
Organisations and she said "We identified ourselves with
the Liberation Struggles in those countries as those people
were suffering from the same denial of fundamental rights
My lords, all these references - the only one,I would ask
your lordships with respect to delete the other references
in paragraph 11 and in paragraph 12 . . .
BEKEER J5 The one you've read; you ask us >
20974. MR. LIEBENBERG
to delete all the other references?
MR. LIEBENBERG-s The one I read stands, ray
lords; I ask you to delete all the other references.
BEKKER J; Why?
MR. LIEBENBERG; My lords, because I am trying
to "be safe; it's just that on the other occasions she
referred for instance - she was dealing with the Congress
of Democrats, she was dealing with the Federation of
South African Women - - -
RUMPFF J; But this reference on 14590 where
she says that they identified themselves with the Libe-
ratory struggle in Indo-China, Czechoslovakia etc., not
with their methods. Now, that is a proper reference.. .
MR. LIEBENBERG; As I say, my lords, I was
merely trying to be cautious; she was speaking, and your
lordships will remember it very well - she was speaking
on behalf of the whole Congress Movement. My lords, she
was giving evidence - she started off by dealing with
the Indian Congress; then she dealt with the A.N.C.;
then she dealt with the Congress of Democrats, with the
Federation of South African Women; then at times with
the whole Organisation. It's very difficult, my lords,
to pinpoint and try and put her evidence in sections as
it were and say "this only relates to the Peace Council"
and "that only relates to so and so", because she was
speaking - - if I may deal with that briefly, my lords -
she was saying that the Congress Movement had a non-
violent policy, that it wanted to modify the present State
it was not against Capitalism; it wanted to do away with
the Racialist policy; and in that connection, my lords,
she was speaking on behalf of the whole Organisation, and
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
when she refers to the Liberation struggles elsewhere
she was saying that they identified themselves with the
objects, not with the methods. I shall deal with tiiat
as I go on, my lords, because I want to show your lord-
ships that nowhere in the Peace Council literature did
that point of view ever appear as being adopted; nowhere
- it is here for the first time that we heard that there
was an artificial dividing line between methods and objects
On the contrary, my lords, when these people say "Look at
the courageous struggle in Kenya, look at the struggle in
Vietnam', and by supporting those people we help ourselves"
they were not saying, my lords, "We must be a bit careful
about the violent methods of those struggles" , they were
concerned with the objects and in my submission they were
not concerned with what methods were adopted. As far as
they were concerned it could be violent methods, and I will
ahow , my lords, that the Peace Council definitely allied
itself with the idea of violent methods.
My lords, I may refer,at the bottom of the page
your lordships will see a reference to her evidence at
pge 14846, where she emphasised the S,A,Peace Council
view of indivisibility of peace and liberation, and the
one that I have already dealt with, that they identified
themselves with those liberation struggles, and I submit,
my lords, that nowhere in the vast amount of the S.A.
Peace Council literature is there any note to be found
of a condemnation of violent action resorted to by the
Colonial peoples. And nowhere did they separate methods
from objects, as I have already stated. They lauded the
heoric struggles, they emphasised for instance the case
of Kenya, "Look how they are fighting there against the
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
fearful odds, heavily armed British troops, and they are
struggling courageously". The implication, my lords, is
there, that they favoured that type of struggle.
My lords, then I come to Section G which deals
with Methods. In regard to the methods of struggle to
he employed it is submitted that although the South African
Peace Council did not advocate violent action in specific
terms the undermentioned statements by prominent members
make the inference irresistable that their minds were
running along the lines of violent action, and that in
the event of circumstances being propitious for a violent
uprising they would not hesitate to endorse such action.
My lords, yesterday I referred to the speech
of Hilda Watts, which she made at the Inaugural Conference
of the Peace Council, record page 8335, line 22 to 30,
stating that the beliefs of the Peace Movement were that
all forms of fighting were not necessarily wrong in all
circumstances, and that not every solution now there
I submit, my lords, there is obviously an error - - what
she meant was 'not every problem* can be settled by
negotiation, otherwise that passage would not make sense,
my lords.
Then I also referred your lordships yes-
terday to the speech E.217 of Jean Paul Sartoe; I had
overlooked for the moment the fact that I have embodied
the references to that speech in the written heads of
argument. Your lordships will see the references in this
paragraph where the person deals at page 1817 line 9 to
1818 line 11, with the just wars, wars of liberation,
waged by Colonial peoples, and condemning the use of atom
bombs because it enables the warmongers to wage war without
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
the aid of the people. My lords, this I submit is a very
interesting article. The author, Jean Paul Sartoe was
dealing with the role of the masses, the role of the
people in the struggle for liberation, and he condemns
the atom bomb because he said that enabled the warmongers
to make war without the agency or the help of the people
- - the underlying assumption being that the warmongers
would never be successful if they were to try and employ
the masses in theirs truggles. Therefore it condemned
the use of the atom bomb for that purpose and it was
lauding the just war, the war of liberation, which comes
from the history of the C,P.S.U, my lords, a Communist
concept. This speech, my lords, I indicated to your
lordships, was reproduced in "Fighting Talk" issue - I
think of round about March, 1955, and here I would like
to make a correction - not really a correction, perhaps
just to state it more expressively. I did mention yes-
terday that Mrs. Ruth Slovo was joint editor of "Fighting
Talk"; I didn't try to convey by that that she was at
that time necessarily linked with the Peace Council,
because she had been banned, but the association was
there at some stage, my lords - it wasn't very difficult
for her to have access to the Peace Council material or
to get the material for publication in "Fighting Talk".
And, my lords, I submit that by the reproduction of that
speech of Jean Paul Sartoe it clearly shows that the
Peace Council allied itself, associated itself, with that
sentiment expressed by the person in that document,
My lords, Ifm sorrs^ to have to come back to
this document A.248, but it deals specifically with the
question of struggles. On page 903> line 9 to 179 it
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
states that every conquest won in the course of the
struggle for National Liberation constitutes an advance
of the Peace Forces of aggression, and (2) every success
of the Peace Movement represents an advance for the forces
of liberation over the forces of aggression and oppression,
at page 910, line 17 to 20, it states that every blow
struck against the present Government would represent an
important victory for the Peace forces. I submit that
these passages show without doubt that the Peace Movement
would approve of any violent action taken by the Liberation
Movement, and I submit, my lords, if violence was to be
excluded from it's propaganda, then this document A.248
which was prepared with such thoroughness, which seemed
to deal with all the issues - various issues affecting the
Peace struggle - - then in this very document one would
have expected them to say that "We separate method from
object", "We don't approve of violent action."
I submit, my lords, if one reads this document
as a whole one gets the impression that the Peace Council
was emphasising the indivisibility of the struggle of
peace with the struggle for liberation, and says that
every conquest, every success, every blows truck would
be a support for the Peace Movement.
And, my lords, then in paragraph E - I don't
want to burden your lordships with repetition of these
principles of indivisibility of the struggle for peace
with the struggle for liberation ; it 's clearly repeated
by Kathrada and the speech that I mentioned there, Resha's
speech, Watts' speech, document E.77, to which I have
already referred, and document E.78, a roneoed document
circular issued by the Cape Town Peace Council. Nov/ I've
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
not referred to that document previously, my lords. This
was the passage - the relevant passage appears on page
1918 line 5 to line 10, and I have already referred your
lordshis to E.44 and E.48.
Now, Mrs. Joseph, at page 14312 says that the
aims of the Congress of the Peace Movements are - - at
page 14846 she gave the following evidence, that it was
the attitude of the South African Peace Council that the
employment of methods to obtain liberation in South Africa
was left to the whole Congress Alliance, and I realise,
my lords, that this portion of her evidence must be read
in the light of the whole of her evidence which emphasised
the non-violent policy of the Congress Movement, but I
do submit that it goes some way to show the close co-
operation between the Peace Council and the Congress
Movement.
My lords, then I would ask your lordships to
ignore the references to paragraph E . . .
BEKKBR J% Must we delete that? The whole of
it?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lords, I think so,
RUMPEE J; Is this because it's a personal
view?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes. . . .
RUMPEE Js Or not clearly the viewof the
Peace Council?
MR. LIEBENBERG; That is it, my lord. Some
of them, my lords, I can refer to but really I would
suggest tnat her evidence as a whole could be dealt with
more effectively when her personal position is analysed,
because here it is not of much importance really.
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
The documents, my lords, in many cases contradict her
evidence.
My lords, then I refer to Paragraph G: It
is submitted that there is no indication in the evidence
about the South African Peace Council to indicate that
the Congress Alliance should employ strictly non-violent
methods, or that the South African Peace Council took
some steps to disassociate itself from the Congress
Alliance in the event of violent measures being resorted
Now I 'd like to read paragraph H, then I ' l l
come back to this points 11 If one takes into account
the fact that prominent members of the Congress Movement
also held prominent positions in the South African Peace
Council, that those very members either made violent
speeches at the A.N.C. or other meetings, or heard such
speeches being made, one cannot escape the conclusion
that the South African Peace Council was quite prepared
to endorse violent action even when decided on by the
Congress Movement."
My lords, Mrs* Joseph's evidence was that
non-violent pressure was to be exercised on the electorate
to get a change of the position in South Africa. My
submission is that if non-violent pressure on the elec-
torate was their real method of struggle, then all
reference to violent conflicts and the emphasis on
actions of Colonial peoples are totally irrelevant,
and they don't fit in to the scheme of the Peace Council.
Yesterday, yourlordships will remember we were dealing
with the question of negotiation and his lordship, Mr.
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
Justice Bekker said there might possibly be a third way, 1
rather that we could discuss it. Now I submit, my lords,
I should deal with that question here, that if one looks
at the activities and speeches, pronouncements of the
Peace Council, one finds only two alternatives as it were 5
the present situation, the present set-up #iich they 5
condemn, and indicating that a change should be made,
and then indicating how other people sought, or are seek-
ing to achieve the change, and nowhere did they suggest
any middle course, and although I submit it is possible
for one to see a possible third way it is not what the 10
Peace Council in its literature propounded. Eor that
reason, my lords,I submit that all their references to
violent struggles elsewhere, the way those struggles
were conducted - the lauding of those struggles - was
done with the specific object of conditioning the people 15
in South Africa for a similar struggle. Otherwise, I
say, my lords, that their references to those would be
completely irrelevant. Then they could have issued a
circular saying that they stahd for negotiation and
20
that they are not interested in the s truggles elsewhere.
But on the contrary they do not do that.
Now, my lords, your lordships will see
I say; "The fact that prominent members of the Congress
Movement also held prominent positions in the A.N.C,
and that very strong speeches were made", and I submit,
my lords, that it is inconceivable that the Peace
Council through the means of its members who represented
it or who addressed or heard speeches made that the A.N.C.
would not have heard - after all the Peace Council is 30
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
constituted of people like Resha, like Kathrada and other
persons who expressed themselves very strongly on many
occasions. Mrs. Joseph heard many speeches. Now, this
is perhaps a good illustration with respect, my lords.
Mrs.Joseph's evidence was to the effect - on page 14789 -
she denied the implication of violence in the speeches
of Resha generally; then she denied the implication of
violence in speeches made by him on specific occasions,
for instance at page 14801 to 2 the speech that he made
at the West Street secret meeting on the 22nd November,
1956, at the A.N.C. Sophiatown meeting on the 7th November,
1954 - that appears at page 14680 - - the speech made
by Sejake at the Ereedom Charter Committee, Johannesburg,
on the 18th September, 1955. Now, my lords, first of all
I . . .
BEKKER J; She says she wasn't present when
those speeches were made; she was dealing with them
here in the witness box.
MR. LIEBENBERG: Except that she was present
on the occasion of the Sophiatown speech of the 7th
November, my lord. . .
BEKKER J. Is that the Germiston language -
the Beerhall language speech?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Where he spoke of a major
clash - they must warn the people that a major clash
would take place in Sophiatown, my lords.
BEKKER J; Which one is that please.
MR. LIEBENBERG; First of all I would like to
deal with the position in this form, my lords. Mrs.Joseph
was an Executive Committee member of the Peace Council.
She attended meetings where strong speeches were made,
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
and I submit, my lords, that knowing her organisations
as she did, knowing that their policy was to stand with
close co-operation with those organisations, then surely
it must have dawned on her that something was being said
and that a distinct line was being taken by this Congres
Movement eith which they seemed to co-operate - and she
should have been put on her guard there and then, and
Mien informed her Executive and say "We must be careful
about co-operating with the A.N.C. this is the line that
is adopted by Executive members of the A.N.C" 5 but
nothing of that kind ever happened, my lords. A man
like Resha, an Executive Committee member of the Peace
Council, enjoyed himself, if I may use the word,when
he addressed meetings of the A.N.C. and elsewhere,
and freely spoke of violence. I submit there is not
the slightest doubt that he .was propagating violent
action, and Mrs. Joseph, when she denied the implication
of violence in those speeches, was clearly associating
herself with Resha. I cannot understand, but I would
like to suggest that her denial of the implication of
violence is unsatisfactory, and coupled with all the
other factors, all the other circumstances associated
with the Peace Council's policy and expressions of
point of view, - all that should be taken into account
in determining whether or not the Peace Council was in
favour of violent action.
BEKES R J; Just enlightenme on this point.
Take the speech of the 22nd November, the 'Murder Murder
speech?
MR. LIEBEEBERGs Yes, my lord.
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
BEKKER J; Now Mrs. Joseph wasn't present
at that meeting; it was put to her here in the witness
box and she gave her views.
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord.
BEKKER J; Now tell me - assuming her evidence
is to be rejected as you submit here it should be - - this
rejection of her evidence will strengthen the Crown's
contention that the Peace Council was in favour of violent
action." I'm not quite certain that I follow how that
is so.
MR. LIEBENBERG; That reflects more especially
her evidence in relation to this speech, my lord - - reflects
more on her credibility; I was dealing here in my submission
with her general evidence about Resha; the general impli-
cation of violence in speeches that she heard.
BEKKER J; That I understand . . . .
MR. LIEBENBERG; On that basis I can quite see
that this speech of the 22nd November should be deleted
from consideration here, because in the light of my sub-
mission she could - - she had not heard th±3 speech . . .
BEKKER J; I can understand this position;
a member of one organisation standing for peace listening
to a speech made by a partner which suggests violence;
that this member will say "Now look here, just let us
enquire a little bit into matters; I heard him make such
and such a speech"; that I understand. But the other
position is the latter one, that I don't quite follow.
A speech not heard.
MR. LIEBENBERG; That is why I say, my lord,
as far as Mrs. Joseph is concerned the speechthat she
idn't hear couldn't be of assistance, but then as far as
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
Resha is concerned, my lord, also an Executive Committee
member of the Peace Council who actually made the speech,
as far as he is concerned I submit he is, if I may call
it that, a fighter through whom the Peace Council
might . . . .
BEKKER J; It 's not a possibility to be con-
sidered. He may say well, now, look here, on the
occasion of the 22nd November, I know the Peace Council
is a non-violent organisation, but I'm talking here on
A.N.C. policy, and when I say murder, you murder. Now,
couldn't that enter into consideration, which destroys
your submission.
MR. LIEBENBERG; But, my lord, there is no
suggestion anywhere that the Peace Council had a non-
violent policy. There is no suggestion that it was a
pacifist body, my lords. There was no indication.
Resha spoke onthe Peace Council platforms . . . .
BEKIER J; In your submission the mere
fact that a man happens to occupy two positions on an
Executive, and he speaks on one occasion in violent
terms, from that you must infer that when he is acting
in the other capacity he is still of the same view,
or that the policy of the latter is violent?
MR. LIEBENBERG; If I may put it this way
it would certainly have been the means of conveying
to the Peace Council the nature of the other organisa-
tion with which it was associated so closely.
My lords, I want to come to this last section
"H" , The co-operation between the South African Peace
Council and the other organisations. My submission is
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
that it co-operated so closely and supported the activitie
of the other organisations to such an extent that the
inference becomes irresistable that the South African
Peace Council had knowledge of, and approved of their
policies, to work to overthrow the State. And then I
indicate the close links between these various organisa-
tions. This section, my lords, is rather lengthy and
perhaps I should indicate to your lordships that the
first seven paragraphs relate to the association between
the Peace Council and the other organisations , other
bodies, in this whole Congress Alliance, for instance
"New Age", "Advance".
Then paragraph 9 of this sections I set
out here the membership of the Peace Council. That is
rather a long list, my lords, setting out the documents
which indicate the membership; names of witnesses who
testified to the membership of the persons concerned.
Then, my lord, there is a section, paragraph 10, of this
same section which deals with meetings by other organisa-
tions. That appears on page 23 of this long list, my
lords. I'm not relying, my lords, on the contents of
speeches; I'm merely indicating how the Peace Council
members were active generally in the activities of the
whole Congress Movement.
Then, my lords, in paragraph 11 I deal with. . .
BEKKER Js May I just take you back to page
24, Mr. Liebenberg. On the top you've got "A.N.C.Sophia-
town, Resha". Was he at this meeting on behalf of the
Peace Council or the A.N.C?
MR. LIEBENBERG: He was there on behalf of
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
the A.N.C. That's why I'm merely showing, my lords,
that this is not an exhaustive list; it is just a
list that I felt might . . . .
BEKKER J; But the heading misleads one, you see.
"Meetings of other organisations attended or addressed by
P.Council members."
MR. LIEBENBERG; But not on behalf of the Peace
Council, my lord. That is the qualification here, my
lord - not on behalf of the Peace Council.
BEKKER J; Well, 'attended or addressed by
South African Peace Council members not on behalf of".
MR. LIEBENBERG; Not on behalf of, my lords.
I'm sorry, my lords, perhaps I have to qualify it in
one slight respect and that is in connection with the
Rev. Thompson who addressed the C.O.P. Anniversary meet-
ing on the 26th June, 1956, where he spoke as a Peace
Council member. As I say, my lords, I merely try to
show - - for instance to take an example - the Rev.
Thompson was also at other meetings organised by other
bodies, like the Congress of Trade Unions, the Congress
of Democrats, the C.O.P. meetings and so on - just to
show that they had access to the other organisations -
that they attended their meetings - that they knew the
line that the other organisations were taking.
My lord, in paragraph 11, I have a submission
about how the Peace Council used the channels of the
Congress Movement to strengthen its own propaganda.
Then I have a section 12 which deals with literature
generally - literature distributed and so on. My lords,
I do not know whether I should go through all these
documents one by one, which are mentioned in seven
20988. MR.LIEBENBERG
paragraphs which show the strength of the co-operation i
between the Peace Council the A.N.C. , and so on, except
that there is a qualification. A very slight difference,
ay lords, but yesterday I made a statement in the open-
ing part of my address that the A.N.C. and the Indian
Congresses were instrumental in convening the First 5
Transvaal Peace Council. I've checked on that, my lords,
and it's really the Transvaal leaders of the African,
Indian, Coloured community - theleaders of those congresses
were instrumental in convening the First Transvaal Peace
Council. And coupled with that is the fact that the 10
principal office bearers of these organisations occupied
the prominent and leading positions of this organisation.
My lords, I want to try and save time if possible
and I can start dealing with the co-operation between the
Peace Council and the A.N.C, but I submit these documents 15
as I have indicated here are clearly admissible against
- for instance the first two documents, A.263 (1) and
A.262 are clearly documents which were found in the offices
of the A.N.C. and they show a link with the Peace Council.
I submit that as far as the A.N.C. is concerned certainly 20
those two documents are admissible to show the co-operation
with the Peace Council.
RUMPFF J; I think you might just deal with the
question of violence now, in your paragraph H. You say
that the S.A.P.C. co-operated very closely and supported
th© activities of the other organisations to such an ex-
tent . . . . . " Well, now Let's assume that all the documents
to which you refer show co-operation, and the fact that
the members, some of the members ofthe Peace Council were
members of the other organisations — leading members - - 30
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
this is also shewn - -
MR. LIEBENBERG; Starting with paragraph 9, my
lord, on page 6.
RUMPFE J; And the other features to which you
rely on. Assume that that is disclosed "by the evidence;
than your argument is, on the assumption that there is
this co-operation, that there is knowledge that a leading
iamber of the Peace Council is also a leading member of
the A.N.C. and so there must be deemed to be knowledge -
and the inference then becomes irresistable that the
S.A.P.C. had knowledge of and approved of their policy
- that's the other organisation's policy - - to work
for a violent overthrow of the State. Now I think it
has been stated here by Crown representatives that the
Crown case is not that the Congress Alliance's policy was
to work for a violent clash in the sense that it encouraged
its members to commit violence against the State, but that
it wanted to organise the masses on a two-fold basis,
(1) eventually to provoke the State into action, to
suppress such action as the masses might take, and 2)
to encourage the masses to clash finally with the State.
MR. LIEBENBERG; There is nothing complicated,
my lord. . . .
RUMPFF J; On the basis that the Crown's case is
that the Congress Alliance wanted the masses to act in a
manner so as to provoke the State into action against
them - that is the first stage . . .
MR. LIEBENBERG; I associate myself with that,
my lord.
RUMPFE Js Now do you wish to add to your sub-
mission on this basis? Do you say that that was, according
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
to the prosecution, the policy relied upon here, by
the Prosecution; that is the policy which the Prosecu-
tion says the Congress Alliance had?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord. Your lordships
will remember I dealt with the documents which were issued
by the Peace Council, circulars for instanee from time to 5
time - - other general statements which conveyed this
idea to the masses; for instance, with particular
reference to struggles in other Colonial countries, to
condition them for a similar action in South Africa.
RUMPFP J; Yes. But is there anything in par- 10
ticular that you want to say; you say that the facts
which you advance here,co-operation to be inferred from
the documents, correspondence and the fact of dual
membership - - that that gives rise to an inference
that the Peace Council had knowledge of this policy? 15
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord. That is
the effect of this whole submission, my lord. I would
have liked to deal with one section, section 11, just
briefly, my lord; that appears on page 24 which also
bears out this submission that I've made, that -the 20
S.A.Peace Council used the channels afforded by the
Congress Movement for spreading its propaganda, and
E.26(A) is the South African Peace Council typed letter
of the 24th September, 1954, addressed to the various
sections of the Peace Council in South Africa, stating
that the numerous C.O.P. meetings would provide oppor-
tunities for putting over peace policy. Then the speech
of Tundray, my lord, made at the Inaugural Conference
in August, page 8330, line 14 to 25, where he stated
that they must see that the Peace Movement goes out amongst
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
the masses and that the struggle against Racial discrimi-
nation, the Group Areas Act and Passes, was part of the
struggle for peace. There, with respect, my lords, your
lordships will find the same view expressed. And it
was very neatly put in the document E.44 on page 18, line
2, lines 16 to 22, which was the Transvaal - the type
written Transvaal Peace Council document, discussion notes
on Peace policy, and my lords, unfortunately there is a
typing error here, and I 'd like to correct that. It
should read, or rather my summary should read as follows:
Tour lordships will see paragraph (c) - Document E.44 -
reference to page 1892, stating that the struggle of the
non-Europeans and of the democratic Europeans against
oppressive laws, is in itself a struggle for peace.
There, with respect, my lore's, the same idea.of
organising the masses, linking their struggle for libera-
tion with the struggle for peace.
In A.249, my lords, there is a useful passage,
with respect, "Problems of Organisation" - page 912,
line 20 to line 23, stating the necessity in the Peace
work for linking the aims of the struggle for peace
with the National and local interests of the population.
There, again, my lords, the same theme recurs.
(COURT ADJOURNED POR 15 MINUTES )
20992. MR. LIEBENBERG
ON THE COURT RESUMING i
MR. LIEBENBERG; May it please your lordships,
I continue with . . . .
RUMPFF J; Is section 6, speeches, the section
(a) , the .S.A.P.C. conference - Thompson?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord.
RUMPFF J: Then there is one at (b).
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes. . . .
RUMPFF J; Referring to the setback received
by the United States in Korea.
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord. Now at the bottom
your lordships will see I quoted "We must march together in
making a new world", and I stop there. Now my learned
friend draws my attention to the last sentence in this
paragraph, and I would like to read it, my lords. I do
not want to give any wrong impression but my submission
is that this doesn't make any difference. He sayss
"We must march together in making a new world. Mr. Nehru,
the Prime Minister of India, that great fighter for peace,
has again done his bit'1' „ Now, my lords, we know from the
evidence that Nehru was also anti-Imperialist and fight-
ing for the cause of world peace. . . .
RUMPFF J; Is that the only portion that you
want to read? That Nehru has also done his bit?
MR. LIEBENBERG ; That's all, my lord. I submit
that that does not make any difference.
My lords, I would like to deal briefly with the
question of the Peace Council's role in disseminating
material of the World Peace Council. I shall not detain
your lordships on this point. Unfortunately I haven't
had time to have this typed out; I was wondering if I
20993. MR. LIEBEMERG
coulcl perhaps have it typed out, my lords, and present it
to your lordships later. It 's just to show how the
speeches made out the World Peace Council's sessions
were distributed; for instance, to use an example,
a speech ipade or purported to have been made by a
Chinese representative, Kuomojo, at a World Peace Council
session, was distributed at the South African Peace
Council Conference on the 2nd August, 1954, according to
D/Sgt. van Heerden on page 8690 of the record, and Chief
Luthuli's evidence on page 13678, saying that Congress
allowed the Peace Council and perhaps the World Peace
Council to spread their propaganda at Congress meetings,
and E.320, record page 2222, which is a South African
Peace Council letter to the Capetown Peace Council enclosing
25 copies of Burnell's speech and 25 copies of the World
Peace Council message and resolution, and 25 copies of
Niemauler's speech.
My lords, I am referring to this because I
want to suggest that in the light of this evidence it is
clear that the South African Peace Council used the
material received from the Worls Peace Council for spread-
ing their propaganda, and I particularly want to refer
your lordships to three speeches - three documents rather,
which appear to be speeches of persons at the World
Peace Council. The first one is that of Jean Paul Sartoe
which was reproduced in "Fighting Talk", EP.17. The
second is this speech of Kuomojo which is also found in
the Peace Council's office as E.215, and the last one
I S • • • •
EEKIS R Js Was that ever reproduced as any
other document?
20994. MR. LIEBENBERG
MR. LIEBENBERGi Ho, my lord, but that one was
- well, perhaps I should qualify it by saying a speech
of Kuomojo was distributed at the Peace Council Confer-
ence on the 2nd August, 1954. And the speech by Jean
Paul Sartoe was in "Fighting Talk", and the speech of
Han-su-ya, E.208, read into the record at page 1808 -
about that one we have no evidence that it was repro-
duced, but those three speeches clearly in my submission
show the line followed by the World Peace Council in its
anti-American - anti-Western and pro-Soviet Union attitude,
and pro-liberation struggles, specially, my lord, in the
violent struggles in Korea and lauding the gallant and
glorious part played by the Chinese volunteers in the Korea
struggle.
Now those three speeches, my lords, I submit
are very significant towards determining the line of the
World Peace Council as under st ood, and accepted and pro-
pagated by the South African Peace Council.
My lords, I have prepared a Schedule of
documents that we embodied in that big bulky World Peace
Council's circular which is numbered "International 1 " ,
and in this schedule, my lords, I merely indicate where
the various documents were found that were quoted in res-
pect of the South African Peace Council in that schedule.
I'm given to understand that each member of the Crown
dealt with an organisation, dealt with the documents -
the admissibility of the documents quoted in that schedule
in respect of the organisation that he was dealing with.
In this schedule, my lords, it indicates where the docu-
ments were found which the Crown used in support of its
allegations in the schedule, my lords.
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
Lastly, my lords, there is one matter affecting
the South African Peace Council. I crave your lordships'
indulgence to mention at this stage that the speeches
made on the occasion to which I have referred, at the
Peace Council Conference in August, 1953, and the Peace
Council Conference in August, 1954, which was inadvertently
omitted when I dealt with the argument relating to the
Communists. I would ask your lordships' indulgence to
hand them in now . . . .
BEKKER J: I'm not quite clear; what is this?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Perhaps I should clarify the
position, my lords. When we dealt with the Communist dogma
in relation to the various organisations we dealt with
documents specifically, documents which emanated from these
various organisations, "but in the case of the South African
Peace Council we had intended referring your lordships to
a few speeches, to deal with in conjunction with the other
documents.
RUMPFF J; In relation to the Communist dogma?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Yes, my lord.
RUMPFF Js What is that now?
MR. LIEBENBERGg This is the list showing
the speeches and the speakers, my lords, indicating in
each case whether it was exclusive, whether the speech
was in the Crown's submission exclusively Communist dogma
and setting out . . . .
RUMPFF J: Well, just let us look at that.
MR. LIEBENBERG; As your lordship pleases.
RUMPFF J; This really belongs then to the
argument which Mr. de Vos put to us.
MR. LIEBENBERG8 Thst is so, my lord.
20996. MR. LIEBENBERG
This is just for insertion in the file of documents 1
concerning the South African Peace Council. My lords,
that one speech, or reference to the meeting of the
Natal Peace Council in Durban on the 2 5 t h April, 1954,
I've deleted that from those schedules; I just want to
confirm that, my lords. 5
MR. DE VPS; May I crave your lordships'
indul gence to ask this, that in considering the Commu-
nist policy of the South African Peace Council, to take
into account also what Mr. Liebenberg has set out to be
the worldwide ramifications to which the South African 10
Peace Council was attached in connection with its propa-
gation of peace, the World Peace Council on a world wide
scale. He made a certain submission on that point, my
lords, that the South African Peace Council was connected
with the World Peace Council and the world wide struggle 15
for peace on a Communist basis. I merely ask the Court,
when considering the S.A.P.C. as a Communist organisation,
to take that also into account as a factor, as a submission
that must be weighed . . „
RDMPPE J; If you do want to do that, why
don't you just hand in a document, a short document,
that we can put with your argument, because now we've
got to find this somewhere in the record.
MR. DE VPS; As your lorsship pleases, I
will do that. 25
MR. LIEBENBERG; My lords, that, with res-
pect, disposes of the argument on the South African
Peace Council. I now proceed to deal with the organisation
called the South African Society of Peace and Friendship
with the Soviet Union. 30
20966. MR. LIEBENBERG
My lords, as far as this organisation is con-
cerned, I would like to say at the very outset that the
Crown did not make any allegation in the Policy Schedule
that this organisation had a violent policy and with respect,
as I see the position, the Crown is precluded from now
attempting to argue that it had such a policy, but I do
submit, my lords, that in the light of the allegations
made in the Indictment, that the accused conspired to
act in their personal capacities and/or through the
instrumentality of an organisation like the South African
Society for Peace and Friendship with the Soviet Union,
amongst others in paragraph 4(a) - the Means Clause -
did propagate Marxism-Leninism. The Crown is entitled
to raise an argument on the activities of this organisa-
tion, my lords, and to convey to your lordships the gist
of the propaganda distributed or disseminated by this
organisation. The allegation, I submit, is there, that
this organisation was used for a specific purpose and
insofar as it's purpose was to propagate Marxism-Leninism
and to that extent the allegations in the Indictment cover
the activities of this organisation. „ .
BEKKER J; Is this organisation mentioned at
all in your Indictment?
MR. LIEBENBERG• In the Indictment it is men-
tioned, yes, my lord.
BEKKER J % But not in the Policy Schedule?
MR. LIEBENBERG; Not in the Policy Schedule.
My lords, I want to be very brief with this organisation
because the Crown submits that the part it played in the
whole Congress Alliance was pre-eminently of a propagandis-
t s nature. It consistently defended and supported
Collection: 1956 Treason Trial Collection number: AD1812
PUBLISHER: Publisher:- Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand Location:- Johannesburg ©2011
LEGAL NOTICES:
Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, you may download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/or educational non-commercial use only.
People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate, distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand has not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors or omissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any related information on third party websites accessible from this website.