The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn’t Want You to Read
2
For Immediate Release Tuesday, March 29, 2011 The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn¶t Want You to Read In the weeks since Governor Walker introduced his reforms to balance the budget and protect middle-class taxpayers the New York Times has repeatedly used its editorial pages to opine on the reforms. All told there h ave been at least seven editorials , op-eds or columns in the paper about the Wisconsin reforms. Below is the Op-Ed that Governor Walker wrote that the New York Times chose not to run: In nearly every state across America, Governors are f acing major budget deficits. Many, Democrat and Republican alike, are cutting state aid to schools and other local governments - which will force massive layoffs, massive property tax increases or both. In Wisconsin, we are doing something progressive in the best sense of the word. We are implementing reforms to pr otect middle class j obs and middle class taxpayers. While our idea may be a bo ld political move it is a very modest request o f our employees. We are reforming the bargaining system so o ur state and local governments can ask e mployees to contribute 5.8% for pension and 12.6% for health insurance premiums. These reforms will help them balance their budgets. In total, our ref orms save local governments more than $700 milli on ea ch year. Most workers outsi de of government would love our proposal . Over the past several m onths, I have visited numerous fa ctories and small businesses across Wisconsin. On these tours, workers tell me that they pay anywhere from 15% to 50% of their health insurance premium costs. The average middle class worker is paying more than 20% of his or her premium. Even federal employees pay more than twice what we are asking state and local government workers to pay and most of them don¶t have co llective bargaining for wages or benefits. These facts beg the question as to why the protesters are i n Wisconsin and not in Washington, D.C. By nearly any measure, o ur requests are quite reasonable. Beyond helping to balance current and future budgets, our reforms will improve the quality of our governments. No l onger will hiring and firing b e done solely based on seniority and uni on contracts. Instead, schools - as well as state and local governments - will be able to make decisions based on merit and per formance. This concept works well in Indiana. In 2005, Governor Mi tch Daniels reformed collective bargaining. In turn, the governm ent got more efficient, more eff ective and more accountable to the public. Governor Daniels even encouraged employees to come forward with ways to sav e
-
Upload
alaphiah1196 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn’t Want You to Read
8/7/2019 The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn’t Want You to Read
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-one-opinion-piece-the-new-york-times-didnt-want-you-to-read 1/2
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn¶t Want You to Read
In the weeks since Governor Walker introduced his reforms to balance the budget and protectmiddle-class taxpayers the New York Times has repeatedly used its editorial pages to opine onthe reforms. All told there have been at least seven editorials, op-eds or columns in the paper about the Wisconsin reforms.
Below is the Op-Ed that Governor Walker wrote that the New York Times chose not to run:
In nearly every state across America, Governors are facing major budget deficits. Many,
Democrat and Republican alike, are cutting state aid to schools and other local governments -which will force massive layoffs, massive property tax increases or both.
In Wisconsin, we are doing something progressive in the best sense of the word. We areimplementing reforms to protect middle class jobs and middle class taxpayers. While our ideamay be a bold political move it is a very modest request of our employees.
We are reforming the bargaining system so our state and local governments can ask employeesto contribute 5.8% for pension and 12.6% for health insurance premiums. These reforms willhelp them balance their budgets. In total, our reforms save local governments more than $700million each year.
Most workers outside of government would love our proposal. Over the past several months, Ihave visited numerous factories and small businesses across Wisconsin. On these tours, workerstell me that they pay anywhere from 15% to 50% of their health insurance premium costs. Theaverage middle class worker is paying more than 20% of his or her premium.
Even federal employees pay more than twice what we are asking state and local governmentworkers to pay and most of them don¶t have collective bargaining for wages or benefits. Thesefacts beg the question as to why the protesters are in Wisconsin and not in Washington, D.C. Bynearly any measure, our requests are quite reasonable.
Beyond helping to balance current and future budgets, our reforms will improve the quality of our governments. No longer will hiring and firing be done solely based on seniority and unioncontracts. Instead, schools - as well as state and local governments - will be able to makedecisions based on merit and performance.
This concept works well in Indiana. In 2005, Governor Mitch Daniels reformed collectivebargaining. In turn, the government got more efficient, more effective and more accountable tothe public. Governor Daniels even encouraged employees to come forward with ways to save
8/7/2019 The One Opinion Piece the New York Times Didn’t Want You to Read
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-one-opinion-piece-the-new-york-times-didnt-want-you-to-read 2/2
taxpayer dollars and they responded. Eventually, the state was able to reward top performingemployees. This is true reform ± making government work for the people.
A recent columnist on these pages opined that ³common problems deserve common solutions´suggesting that Republicans and Democrats work together. In principle, that is a good idea.
Since January 3rd, we passed some of the most aggressive economic development legislation inthe country. And on nearly every measure, many Democrats joined with all of the Republicansand an Independent to vote in favor of the various pieces of legislation. The Wisconsinlegislature recognized that we are growing, not Republican or Democratic jobs, but Wisconsinjobs. Together, we worked to show that Wisconsin is open for business.
But sometimes, bi-partisanship is not so good. During several of the past budgets, members of both political parties raided segregated funds, used questionable accounting principles anddeferred tough decisions. This, along with the use of billions of dollars worth of one-time federalstimulus money for the budget two years ago, left Wisconsin with the current $3.6 billion
deficit.
Our reforms allow us to take a new and better approach. Instead of avoiding the hard decisionsand searching for short-term solutions, we make a commitment to the future. The choices we aremaking now in Wisconsin will make sure our children are not left picking up the pieces of thebroken state budget left behind. Our reforms create the lowest structural deficit in recent historyensuring our budget is stable for decades to come. These changes will give businesses theconfidence they need to grow and invest in our state.
We live in the greatest nation on earth because for more than 200 years we¶ve had leaders whocared more about their children and grandchildren than themselves. Having the courage to make
decisions in the best interest of the next generation ± despite external pressures ± is a conceptthat America has always admired, but is forgetting today. My hope is that Wisconsin willremind the nation what makes our country great.
