THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

4
THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English

Transcript of THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

Page 1: THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE

Early Modern English

Page 2: THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

So, what now?

Renaissance Shakespeare Queen Elizabeth I King James I

Great Vowel Shift a /a/ > /e/ nam > name e /e/ > /i/ fet > feet i /i/ > /ai/ riden > ride o /o/ > /u/ rote > root u /u/ > /ou/ hus > house

Advent of the Printing Press

Page 3: THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

Important People

William Shakespeare Queen Elizabeth I

King James I

Page 4: THE LANGUAGE OF THE RENAISSANCE Early Modern English.

Sample of Early Modern English

O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I! Is it not monstrous that this player here, But in a fiction, in a dream of passion, Could force his soul so to his own conceit That from her working all his visage wann'd,

Tears in his eyes, distraction in's aspect, A broken voice, and his whole function suiting With forms to his conceit? and all for nothing! For Hecuba! What's Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba, That he should weep for her? What would he do, Had he the motive and the cue for passion That I have? He would drown the stage with tears And cleave the general ear with horrid speech, Make mad the guilty and appal the free, Confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed The very faculties of eyes and ears.

What a deceitful fellow - a rogue, a peasant slave - he was! It was monstrous that this actor had only to imagine grief for his face to go pale and his eyes to stream. In a fiction! A made-up script of passion! He was able to effect a broken voice, a desperation in his body language, and everything he felt necessary to the situation he was imagining. And it was all for nothing! For Hecuba, dead for a thousand years! What was Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba, that he should weep for her? What would that actor do if he had the motive and the reason for grief that he had? He would flood the stage with tears and split the ears of the audience with the language he would find, terrifying the innocent and making the guilty mad. He would bewilder the ignorant and amaze the eyes and ears of all.