The Joint 14 th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

19
July 2006 © Copyright 2006. # ! E The Joint 14 th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation Michael W. Tully, CFA, ASA Los Angeles, CA TAS – Valuation and Business Modeling Transaction Advisory Servic

description

Transaction Advisory Services. The Joint 14 th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation. Michael W. Tully, CFA, ASA Los Angeles, CA TAS – Valuation and Business Modeling. Agenda. Fair Value Accounting – US GAAP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Joint 14 th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

Page 1: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

July 2006

© Copyright 2006.#! E

The Joint 14th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference

U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

The Joint 14th Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference

U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

Michael W. Tully, CFA, ASALos Angeles, CA

TAS – Valuation and Business Modeling

Michael W. Tully, CFA, ASALos Angeles, CA

TAS – Valuation and Business Modeling

Transaction Advisory Services

Page 2: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

2

AgendaAgenda

Fair Value Accounting – US GAAP

Valuation Analysis of Intangible Assets - Methodology

SEC Areas of Concern

Fair Value Accounting – US GAAP

Valuation Analysis of Intangible Assets - Methodology

SEC Areas of Concern

Page 3: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

July 2006

© Copyright 2006.#! E

Fair Value AccountingFair Value Accounting

Page 4: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

Basics of SFAS 141/142Basics of SFAS 141/142

SFAS 141SFAS 141 All business combination transactions must follow purchase

accounting (i.e. pooling is gone)

Intangible assets are recorded apart from goodwill

Much clearer guidance of what constitutes an intangible asset for GAAP purposes (paragraph 39)

– Legal/contractual

– Separable

Detailed listing of potential intangible assets provided

– Appendix A, paragraph A14 (see next page)

Significantly increases the disclosure requirements about Business Combinations

Page 5: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

5

Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d) Intangible Assets Recognized as Assets Apart from Goodwill Intangible Assets Recognized as Assets Apart from Goodwill

11::

Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d) Intangible Assets Recognized as Assets Apart from Goodwill Intangible Assets Recognized as Assets Apart from Goodwill

11::

• Marketing-related– Trademarks, trade names,

service marks– Non-compete agreements– Internet domain names

• Customer-related– Customer lists– Backlog– Customer contracts– Noncontractual relationships

• Artistic-related– Plays, operas, ballets– Books, magazines, newspapers– Musical works– Video, including motion pictures

and TV programs– Pictures, photographs

• Contract-based– Licensing, royalty agreements– Franchise or lease agreements– Employment contracts– Use rights– Construction permits– Service or supply contracts– Operating and broadcast rights

• Technology-based– Patented and unpatented

technology– Databases– Trade secrets (such as secret

formulas, processes and recipes)– Computer software

1 SFAS 141, Appendix A paragraph A14

Page 6: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d)Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d)

SFAS 142SFAS 142 Eliminates amortization of goodwill and introduces an impairment-only approach Introduces the concept of a reporting unit and the need to assign assets and liabilities including all goodwill to

reporting units Creates a two-step process for the transitional, annual & interim testing and measurement of goodwill

impairment– Step 1 – essentially a business valuation and comparison of reporting unit fair value to carrying value– Step 2 – essentially a “deemed” purchase price allocation requiring asset valuations to conclude on

current fair value of goodwill

Page 7: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d)Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d)

SFAS 142SFAS 142 Eliminates 40 year maximum life on intangibles Creates a new class of “indefinite lived” intangibles with a need for

transitional, annual & interim fair value – based impairment testing and measurement

Requires finite lived intangible assets to be amortized using a method that reflects pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset is consumed or otherwise used up

Adds to disclosures previously required: – Information about changes in the carrying value of goodwill

– Carrying amount of intangible assets by major intangible asset class for those subject to amortization and those not subject to amortization

– Estimated expense related to intangible assets for the next five years

Page 8: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

8

Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d) Basics of SFAS 141/142 (cont’d)

Adoption Process – SFAS 142Adoption Process – SFAS 142

DefineReporting Units (RU)

DefineReporting Units (RU)

Assign Assets & Liabilities

Incl. GWTo RU

Assign Assets & Liabilities

Incl. GWTo RU

PerformStep 1: Test

(Business valuationcomparison to carrying value)

PerformStep 1: Test

(Business valuationcomparison to carrying value)

FinishNo Further

ActionNecessary

FinishNo Further

ActionNecessary

PerformStep 2:

Measurement(Deemed purchase

price allocationto RU Fair Value)

PerformStep 2:

Measurement(Deemed purchase

price allocationto RU Fair Value)

FinishWrite Off

GW IfIndicated

(Carrying amountof GW exceeds

current Fair Value)

FinishWrite Off

GW IfIndicated

(Carrying amountof GW exceeds

current Fair Value)

StartStart

PassPass

FailFail

Analyze Existing Goodwill (GW) and Intangible

Assets

Analyze Existing Goodwill (GW) and Intangible

Assets

Page 9: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

July 2006

© Copyright 2006.#! E

Valuation Analysis of Intangible Assets - Methodology

Valuation Analysis of Intangible Assets - Methodology

Page 10: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

10

Methodology Framework:Intangible Asset ValuationMethodology Framework:Intangible Asset Valuation

Relief From Royalty Method

Incremental or Differential Method

Cost ApproachMarket ApproachIncome Approach

Replacement or Reproduction Cost Method

Similar Transactions Method

Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method

Page 11: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

11

Multi-Period Excess Earnings MethodMulti-Period Excess Earnings Method

The principle behind the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method is that the value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the subject intangible asset. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

The principle behind the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method is that the value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the subject intangible asset. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

Page 12: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

12

Relief from Royalty MethodRelief from Royalty Method

The basic tenet of the Relief from Royalty Method is that without ownership of the subject intangible asset, the user of that intangible asset would have to make a stream of payments to the owner of the asset in return for the rights to use that asset. By acquiring the intangible asset, the user avoids these payments.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

The basic tenet of the Relief from Royalty Method is that without ownership of the subject intangible asset, the user of that intangible asset would have to make a stream of payments to the owner of the asset in return for the rights to use that asset. By acquiring the intangible asset, the user avoids these payments.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

Page 13: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

13

Incremental or Differential MethodIncremental or Differential Method

Depending on the fact pattern surrounding the valuation of the subject intangible asset, its value may be determined by isolating incremental cash flows generated by cost savings or by pricing premiums. These incremental cash flows are a direct measure of the benefits derived from ownership of the intangible asset and would serve as the basis for an estimate of the value of the subject intangible asset.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

Depending on the fact pattern surrounding the valuation of the subject intangible asset, its value may be determined by isolating incremental cash flows generated by cost savings or by pricing premiums. These incremental cash flows are a direct measure of the benefits derived from ownership of the intangible asset and would serve as the basis for an estimate of the value of the subject intangible asset.

Source: AICPA Practice Aid (Chapter 2, “Valuation Approaches to Estimating Fair Value of Assets Acquired—General Discussion”)

Page 14: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

14

Commonly Identified Intangible Assets:Summary of Primary Valuation MethodologyCommonly Identified Intangible Assets:Summary of Primary Valuation Methodology

Intangible Asset Primary Valuation Approach Primary Valuation Method

Technology Income Approach Multi-Period Excess Earnings

Customer Relationships Income Approach Multi-Period Excess Earnings

Trademarks Income Approach Relief from Royalty

Patents Income Approach Relief from Royalty

Covenant not to Compete Income Approach Differential Method

Assembled Workforce Cost Approach Cost to Re-Create

Goodwill Residual Not Applicable

Page 15: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

July 2006

© Copyright 2006.#! E

SEC Areas of Concern on Fair Value MeasurementsSEC Areas of Concern on Fair Value Measurements

Page 16: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

16

SEC Areas of ConcernSEC Areas of Concern

Primary perspectives and source of questions Is the registrant following the published guidance (“following the rules”)?

What is the registrant’s potential bias?

Process for identifying intangible assets Ensuring that all intangible assets apart from goodwill were identified and

considered to be valued

What was valued? What was not valued?

Valuation methodology Expected (“standard”) approaches, methods

Use of the residual approach to valuation

Use of the word “residual” in any context other than describing goodwill

Primary perspectives and source of questions Is the registrant following the published guidance (“following the rules”)?

What is the registrant’s potential bias?

Process for identifying intangible assets Ensuring that all intangible assets apart from goodwill were identified and

considered to be valued

What was valued? What was not valued?

Valuation methodology Expected (“standard”) approaches, methods

Use of the residual approach to valuation

Use of the word “residual” in any context other than describing goodwill

Page 17: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

17

SEC Areas of Concern (cont.)SEC Areas of Concern (cont.)

Lifing assumptions Consistency with prior valuation analyses Consistency between publicly-available (and company-internal) information and the

purchase price allocation Press releases

Data found by searching the Internet

Industry analyst views

Board presentations

Reports prepared by financial advisors

Assignment of goodwill to reporting units Extreme focus on customer related intangibles

Consistency of Assumptions used in 141 and 142 analyses

Robust support for assumptions used

Focus on assets valued under the Residual Approach leading to Topic D-108

Lifing assumptions Consistency with prior valuation analyses Consistency between publicly-available (and company-internal) information and the

purchase price allocation Press releases

Data found by searching the Internet

Industry analyst views

Board presentations

Reports prepared by financial advisors

Assignment of goodwill to reporting units Extreme focus on customer related intangibles

Consistency of Assumptions used in 141 and 142 analyses

Robust support for assumptions used

Focus on assets valued under the Residual Approach leading to Topic D-108

Page 18: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

July 2006

© Copyright 2006.#! E

Questions?Questions?

Page 19: The Joint 14 th  Annual PBFEA and 2006 Annual FeAT Conference U.S. Financial Accounting Valuation

19

Ernst & Young’s Taiwan ContactsErnst & Young’s Taiwan Contacts

Dr. Ting, Nai-Hsin ( 丁迺忻 協理 )

Principal, EYTAS (Taiwan)

Tel: +886-27204000 x 2510

Cell: 0958-714-715

E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Ting, Nai-Hsin ( 丁迺忻 協理 )

Principal, EYTAS (Taiwan)

Tel: +886-27204000 x 2510

Cell: 0958-714-715

E-mail: [email protected]

Ernst & Young Transaction Advisory Services, Inc. (EYTAS, TW)致遠國際財務顧問股份有限公司

Ms. Jenny Chen ( 陳靖玲 執行董事 )

Partner, EYTAS (Taiwan)

Tel: +886-27204000 x 2206

Cell: 0913-729-593

E-mail: [email protected]

Ms. Jenny Chen ( 陳靖玲 執行董事 )

Partner, EYTAS (Taiwan)

Tel: +886-27204000 x 2206

Cell: 0913-729-593

E-mail: [email protected]