Scholarly Journal of Business Administration, Vol. Vol. 4(3) pp.73-87 March, 2014 Available online http:// www.scholarly-journals.com/SJBA

ISSN 2276-7126 © 2014 Scholarly-Journals

Full Length Research Paper

The influence of leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility and participation of the society to the

effectivity of implementation of government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of government

in bogor city province of West Java

Slamet Riyadi

Doctoral Student at Satyagama University, Indonesia. Email: riyadislamet216@yahoo.com.

Accepted 12 March, 2014

The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility, and participation of society to the effectivity of implementation of government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of government of Bogor city - province of West Java. This research used a survey method, and the statistical analysis were simple regression analysis and multiple regression. Sample consist of 364 aparaturs in the Government of Bogor City chosen using equal stratified random sampling. The variable of this research are leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility, and participation of the society to the effectivity of implementation of government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of government of Bogor city -province of West Java. Results of this research points out whereas the leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility, and participation of the society influence the effectivity of government implementation which is free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of government in Bogor City Province of West Java. Keyword: Influence of leadership, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility

INTRODUCTION Corruption is one of the biggest problems in Indonesia until now. Various surveys conducted by several international comittee always put Indonesia at the top of the most corrupted country in the world. There’s no significant change about it every year, which means a lot of society consider the corruption in Indonesia as endemic, systemic, and widespread (Lubis, 2005:2).

Indonesia is a country in Asia with its clearly corrupt

behavior and always under the radar by the Transparency International (TI). In 2009, Indonesia's IPK figure climb up from bottom to 5th rank of 10 Asian countries (under Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, and Thailand). Compared to the rest of the world, Indonesia are at rank number 111 of 180 countries (Table 1.1.) Todung said that the quality of bureaucracy in Indonesia based on a survey conducted by the Political and

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 74

Table 1. Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2009

Rank Country/Territory CPI 2009 Score Surveys Used Confidence Range

1 New Zealand 9.4 6 9.1 – 9.5

2 Denmark 9.3 6 9.1 – 9.5

27 Estonia 6.6 8 6.1 – 6.9

27 Slovenia 6.6 8 6.3 – 6.9

30 United Arab Emirates 6.5 5 5.5 – 7.5

34 Dominica 5.9 3 4.9 – 6.7

35 Portugal 5.8 6 5.5 – 6.2

69 Montenegro 3.9 5 3.5 – 4.4

71 Bulgaria 3.8 8 3.2 – 4.5

Source: Transparency International, 2010 Note : Higher CPI score means low corruption level

Economic Risk Consultancy (PERC) to 1000 Expatriate in Asia between 1997 and 2005 is always at the big five of the bad bureaucracy.

Based on Corruption Perception Index (CPI) or also named Index Persepsi Korupsi (IPK) year 2010 of 178 countries published in January to September 2010, Indonesia sits at rank 111 with 2,8. Indonesia is way behind its four neighbours such as Singapore at number one with 9,3; Brunei Darussalam with 5,5; Malaysia 4,4; and Thailand 3,5 (further info please read the table). CPI 2010 are combination indexes of 13 survey results conducted by 10 international organization who compiled datas associated with corruption. Those organizations are Africa Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, World Bank, World Economic Forum, Global Insight, Freedom House, Economic Intelligent Unit, Bertelsmann Foundation Institute for Management Development, also Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Hong Kong. This results contradicts with public sectors survey findings by Commission of Corruption Eradication in form of National Integrity Index (abbreviation in Indonesian: IIN) in 2010, with citizens using public services as subjects. IIN figures shows the integrity of service by municipal of Bandar Lampung and Medan are the lowest with 4,54 and 4,44. It shows corruption as an important matter for business doers in Indonesia. CPI surveys also indicates business doers, polices, taxes, courts, also prosecutors as the top priority institutions in corruption eradication. Based on this survey result, TII summons the region governments to use this CPI as business doers trust indicator toward transparency and accountability on its area. TII also appeal to do bureaucracy reformation in public services connected directly with business, also to work more seriously in theprevention or corruption eradication on its areas (tribunnews, 2010).

From data of corruption in Bandung, one of the biggest

contributors of corruption in West Java comes from Bogor, like the 6,8 billion Rupiahs APBD fund corruption case in 2002. At the ratification of APBD, 1,3 billion Rupiah of Additional Cost Budget was misused. Thirty two ex-members of DPRD Bogor period 1999-2004 were involved and being sentenced to prison for a year by Court City of Bogor and also fined 50 million Rupiahs. Case in the City of Bogor, West Java, corruption of DPRD fund year 2002 with amount of 61,64 billion Rupiahs. Ex-Head of DPRD Bogor sentenced for 4 years. The case of Bogor’s Vice Mayor, Ahmad Ru’yat were put behind bars at penitentiary class II A Paledang. District Prosecutor City of Bogor, imprisons the second in command in Bogor City Hall for justice, related to the 6,8 billion Rupiahs APBD coruption case when functioning as DPRD Vice Head of Bogor in 2002. Theoritically, if the corruption in such country like Indonesia not being handled immediately, it will create a total destructive effect to the economy, social growth and the whole progress (Mahmood, 2005 : 62). In Indonesian context, Widjajabrata and Zacchea (2004 : 37) explained that corruption causes two major effects to the economy, they are: (1) as the main obstacle of the economic growth due to the negative effects of it towards the investment and growth of private sector; (2) foreign investors leaving Indonesia as a result of the ongoing corruption. The importance of society role and public accountability in eradicating corruption neither get much attention nor examined deeply in Indonesia. This explained my difficulties in searching and digging information of those two things. Even so, there are statements of some parties that emphasizes the importance of society role and public accountability on the effort of eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (abbreviation in Indonesian : KKN) in Indonesia already becomes a social disease endangering life of a nation

Riyadi 75

Table.2. CPI/IPK of 50 cities in Indonesia in 2010

City CPI/IPK City CPI/IPK

1. Denpasar 6,71 26. Bandar Lampung 4,93

2. Tegal 6,26 27. Kupang 4,89

3. Surakarta 6,00 28. Serang 4,87

4. Yogyakarta 5,81 29. Samarinda 4,85

5. Manokwari 5,81 30. Batam 4,73

6. Gorontalo 5,69 31. Jember 4,71

7. Tasikmalaya 5,68 32. Palembang 4,70

8. Balikpapan 5,58 33. Banda Aceh 4,61

9. Kediri, 5,56 34. Padang Sidempuan 4,58

10. Lhokseumawe, 5,55 35. Tanjung Pinang, 4,55

11. Sampit 5,55 36. Pontianak 4,52

12. Tenggarong 5,41 37. Mamuju 4,45

13. Mataram 5,39 38. Jakarta 4,43

14. Manado 5,35 39. Ternate 4,42

15. Ambon 5,29 40. Bengkulu 4,41

16. Banjarmasin 5,20 41. Jayapura 4,33

17. Kendari 5,20 42. Sorong 4,26

18. Sibolga 5,15 43. Pangkal Pinang 4,19

19. Palu 5,10 44. Medan 4,17

20. Padang 5,07 45. Malang 4,15

21. Purwokerto 5,06 46. Jambi 4,13

22. Bandung 5,04 47. Makassar 3,97

23. Palangkaraya 5,03 48. Surabaya 3,94

24. Pematang Siantar 5,02 49. Cirebon 3,61

25. Semarang 5,00 50. Pekanbaru 3,61

Source: ICW, 2010.

from creating social justice, welfare and independency, even fulfilling basic rights of the susceptible group of society (the poor, the elderly, and neglected children). Decreasing level of welfare (tortures the society), destruction of natural resources, the expensive cost of education and health, lack of skilled human resources, and destruction of society moral are the impacts of KKN. Manual development of ACAP being prepared by the National Level Consultant Team witness the seriousness of the government and World Bank through USDRP to eradicate KKN along with its seeds. Many bureaucracy problems in Indonesia, still can’t be handled either internally or externally. Internally, various factors like democracy, decentralization, and the internal of the bureaucracy itself stilll effecting the problems complexity level in the search for solution ahead. Meanwhile, external factors of globalization and IT revolution influences the search of policy alternative in government aparatur area. All this time the effectivity of the running government of the nation free from corruption, collusion, and nepotism are questionable due to the slow service mission, incorrect and unprofessional attitude towards the

needs of the society, surveillance with secret purpose that occurs at regional government and its whole structure below. Lack of professionalism are the common complaint to the performance of the regional government, therefore creates very low positive perception, and all thats left is the negative perception from the society to the effectivity and performance of the regional government. Professionalism are determined by ones capability of doing jobs based on its own duty and level. The results of the job is measured from every aspects according to portion, object, continuosly in situation and condition also job finising with relatively short period (Almasdi, 2000 : 99). It was re-emphasized by Thoha (2000 : 1) that to maintain its life and dynamics, an organization must be adaptive to organizational change.

The versatile bureacracy in the future is the one with human resources based on knowledge by having various capabilities and skills. Rules of legislation about corruption since 1957 actually shows the willingness of the society to eradicate KKN. Regardless of how many rules of legislation have been made, such normative instruments is still not enough to prevent and eradicate

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 76

Figure 1. Research constellation

KKN. The main problem in preventing KKN also closely related to attitude, behavior, structure, and corrupt political system that creates apathism and resulting tolerance to corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The consequences are the society’s social system being permissive to KKN and consider it as a common and normal behavior. Complexity of problems in running the government to create a clean government demands solution for correction. Therefore, steps of policy leading to prevention and eradicating KKN are needed. Based on those conditions, Government of Indonesia through Indonesia Bersatu Cabinet have placed corruption eradication as one of priorities in national policy and solely commited to create a government that is clean and free from corruption, collusion and nepotism. Achieving a clean government can be done by implementing good principals of running the government in every level, giving sanction to those involved in abuse of power according to the law, increasing intensity and activities of aparatur surveillance through internal, external, and society watch. As an implementation for that commitment, Government of Indonesia decided to design, develop, and execute a National Action Plan to Eradicate Corruption according to President’s Instruction Number 5 Year 2004, about the

acceleration of corruption eradication. The expectation about prevention of KKN practice is not only as a reference for the Central Goverment, but also become a foundation for the regional government in running the goverment development and service to the society. Regional Action Plan to prevent KKN is the regional government’s willingness to a more directional and strategic change in the effort of creating a a clean government. FOUNDATION OF THINKING The relevancy between theories can be seen in this research constellation below figure 1 ; The influence of leadership to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java One of the contributing factors in creating high effectivity is the leader’s role in showing needs professionally. The leader should think forward when facing the cultural

Riyadi 77 diversity of his/her subordinates. Yuniarsih and Suwatno (2008 : 165) stated that in traditional paradigm leadership defined as a skill to influence others by motivating, moving, directing, inviting, leading, and if needed forcing them to do or not to do something. In new paradigm, leadership is widely understanded, not just a skill to influence, what matters is the skill to inspire others so they can be proactively act for the sake of the effectivity, vision, mission, and the goals of the organization. Organization leader at the new era are the visionaries leading the organization, therefore anyone at the management should stick to the vision of the organization and performs as a visionary role model. The influence of controlling to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java According to Stoner and Wankel (2000 : 263) controlling is the process of integrating the objects adn activities of die separate units (departments of functional areas) of an organizational in order to achieve organizational goals efficiently. In other words, controlling is the process of integrating aims and activities of separated units of an organization to reach its goals efficiently. For Stoner, elements of controlling are dimensions integracy of goals. Stoner and Walker (2000 : 263), controlling has dimensions integracy of goals, integracy of activities and goals achieveing efficiently for units or separated parts. The influence of aparatur professionalism to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java According to Paul Mali, cited by Putti (2000 : 416) : (1) weakness in aparatur resources are the narrow minded primordialism attitude in positioning the officers and (2) weakness of interpretation, also disharmony of government duty in the regional or the central. To overcome this situation, we need a systematic efforts in increasing capacities so it can work professionally and optimally, the ability to intervene the competency of the aparatur for the resource of social economy environment an spacial, the ability to guard public necessities based on its own roles. A clear statement by Pigors and Myers in Zainun (2002 : 124), development of human resource needs to be stressed on its mobilization and maintenance that relates to the planning activities, development and execution program, also the control and surveillance of the human resources itself.

The influence of financial resources to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java The concept of modern professionalism in doing a job is based on structural and attitude aspects. Character of structural aspects is part of the training, establishment of professional association and ethic codes, whereas attitude aspects relates to the professionalism behavior. Professionalism is the main criteria for those who works as civil servant. A professional in its job reflects in two dimentions of professionalism. First, dedication to the profession measured from ones dedication to use their knowledge, skill, and resilience to do a task eventhough it is lack of extrinsic reward. Second, social obligation is a view about how important a profession is, also benefits gained by society or other professionals thanks to the existency of that job. The influence of ethics and feasibility to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java In special meaning, related to the art of human socializing, ethics are made in a written code systematically created based on existing moral principals, and when in need it can be used as tools to judge every common sense behavior which does not suit the ethic code. In professional context, doing tasks and responsibilities based on ethics is a must, it’s not even an option. This acts for every human resources parties at the government, and also a civil servant. A civil servant has to understand the basic ethics its government, which is also the professionalism base of it. Consistency in implementing ethics will boost their career and success continuously. the influence of the participation of the society to the effectivity of implementation of the government free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java Budget change happens since 2002 after the introduction of performance budgeting system. That performance approach rely on the participation of the society, involving other stakeholders including the government and DPRD. Act Number 25 Year 2004 specifically explained that planning and budgeting process should be run in synergy. Planning steps is combined with budgeting

steps to create APBD. Planning process starts with compelling ideas from the society to understand problems in each areas. It fits with instruction of regional autonomy that requires society to actively involved in giving input to the making of APBD (Cahyono, 2003). Involving the society in making the budget also appear in Article 23 of 1945 Constitution which states that society have rights to participate in creating and making decision in budgeting. Not only in planning, the discourse of involving the society on budeting seen as positive in transparency process applied by the government. In planning process based on Act Number 25 Year 2004, process of involving the society is called the discussion of government performance (Musyawarah Kinerja Pemerintah or Musrenbang). Musrenbang is a forum among parties involved in asessing government performance. In the regulations, it’s also mentioned that participation of the society defines as their involvement in accomodating needs in the making of development plan process. Participation of society in planning and budgeting reflects them as the biggest APBD contributors from tax and retribution fund, and the government as society’s mandate executor. The influence of leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility and participation of society to the effectivity of implementation of government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of governement in Bogor city province of West Java After looking at yet understanding suggestions from experts regarding the concept of leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility, also the participation of the society, we can draw a red line that professionalism isn’t only talking about the fit between skills and abilities of the aparatur but also the capability of anticipating every environmental change and that includes responding public aspirations. Responsiveness and inovation of government aparatur can’t appear, grow, and develop by itself. There are supportive and blocking factors, that needs a study to understand dominant factors affecting professionality from factors of responsiveness and inovation of government aparatur. From explanation above, the variables are: leadership, controlling and aparatur professionalism to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption is not an independent variable in context of Government in Bogor City. The researcher propose that there are positive influence of leadership, controlling and aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 78 and participation of the society altogether with the effectivity towards implementation of government which free from KKN. LEADERSHIP In Webster’s New World Dictionary of The American Language (2008), leadership is the position or guidance of a leader or “the ability to lead”, and leader is “a person or thing that leads; directing, commanding, or guiding head, as a group or activity.” Psychology books states that “leadership is a relation of an individual to a group, established in interests of achieving, some end.” The book Foundations of Psychology (2008) states that a succesfull leader has two conditions, (1) He or she must share values, atittudes and interests of the group (2) He or she has a higher quality compared to their subordinates, nevertheless, either of them still has good communication towards each other. Other sources states that “leadership is the process of influencing others to understand and agree with what needs to be done and how it should be done effectively, also a process to facilitate individual and collective effort to reach mutual goals (Yukl, 2001 : 8).” CONTROLLING Terry stated that controlling is a synchronized yet regular effort to provide the right amount and time, and leads execution to produce a similar and harmonic action towards decided aim. Brech said controlling is an act of balancing and moving the team by giving a suitable work location for each and protecting the activity so it can be done with a subtle harmony among the members itself (Hasibuan, 2007 : 85). McFarland in Handayaningrat (2005 : 89) says that controlling is a process where the leader balances a group effort efficiently among its subordinates and guarantees a unity of act to reach mutual objective. APARATUR PROFESSIONALISM According to Sianipar (2001 : 14) in Sundarso et al.(2006 : 6) that to be a professional in giving service, government aparatur must be equipped with abilities and knowledge about each jobdesks as stated that professional service is a professional with ability to serve others needs. Meanwhile, the definition of professionalism based on Department of Internal Affairs (2004 : 13) are proficiency in executing duty with outstanding standart, precise time, cautious, with easy-to-understand procedures for the customers.

Riyadi 79 FINANCIAL RESOURCES Theoritically, government budget plays 3 main functions: allocation, distribution, and stability. Regarding function of allocation, budget allocation for public interest or the implementation of the government also for the sake of public service. Other functions includes distributionof income and decreasing poverty (distribution function) as well as creating a condusive micro-economy environment (stability function). Those basic functions acts a s foundation in making fiscal policy and the aspects of income, funding, and country expenses. The purpose of budget composing basically is to synchronize macro-economy policy and available resources, allocate appropriate resources according to government policy and prepare a good budgeting management. Therefore managing budget is very important so it can function as expected such as : (1) giving a direction of the economy policy and clearly describes the use of resources by the society; (2) achieving macro-economy stability in th economy (3) as a controller to deprive flaws and gaps in every aspect of an organization. ETHICS AND FEASIBILITY According to Indonesian Language Big Dictionary (2005), Ethic is a value concerns the right and wrong in a class or society. Ethics is a science of whats good and bad about morals of rights and obligation. Maryani and Ludigdo (2001) explained that ethics is a set of rules, or norm, or guidance regulates human behavior either about what should be done or should not be done by a group or class of society or profession. The principle of ethics and feasibility means that every violation should be treated properly, without pressure and push from any party. Another is the principle of responsibility, where every acts of law enforcers should be taken responsible by them, according to written or unwritten laws. PARTICIPATION OF THE SOCIETY Bhattacharyya (in Ndraha, 2000 : 102) interpret participation as an involvement in collective activities, meanwhile Mubyarto (in Ndraha, 2000 : 102) states participation as willingness to accomodate the success of every program based on each individuals without sacrificing their own interest. Wahyudi Kumorotomo (2009 : 112-114) states that participation is various act of mass or individuals which shows a mutual relation

between the government and its society. Generally, the participation of the citizen can be breakdown into four: (1) electoral participation (2) group participation) (3) citizen-government contracting) (4) direct participation. Soetrisno (in Tangkilisan, 2005 : 320) explaines that participation is a style of development, which means that in relation with process of development, participation should be defined as an effort to transform the development system not as a part of maintenance system. Therefore, participation should be considered as a work value for the society and manager for the development, so the participation functions as a tool to establish the development. The effectivity of the implementation of government which free from corruption collusion and nepotism According to Agus D, et al. (2001 : 36), the effectivity of the implementation of the government means that in doing a work, workers basically needs a sense of safety which associated with: (1) guarentee of the future (2) an organization that gives room to flourish without threats (3) a healthy relationship between superiors and subordinates. Therefore, we can conclude that the effectivity of organization performance is a fine set which describes whole input-process-output cycle to reach the expected goals. Referring to Purwadinata Indonesian Language General Dictionary, corruption is a bad behavior includes money laundry, bribery, etc. In other languages, corruption (English) and corruptie (Dutch) literally means badness, bribeable, immorality. Definition of corruption based on positive law has been contained for the first time in Act Number 3 Year 1971 about The Eradication of Corruption Criminal Act. Most of definition of corruption in the Act refers to the Book of Criminal Law Act (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana). Further, the formulation of corruption is also put in Act Number 31 Year 1999 and Act Number 20 Year 2001. Gillespie and Okhrulik (1991 : 77) mentioned five main issues about corruption which are: definition, cause, impact, context, and activities that includes corruption. Further, Gillespie and Okhrulik views a conceptual definition of corruption needs two quality which are:

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 80

Figure 2. survey technique, using quantitative descriptive analysis with regression statistic analysis

(1) The definition has to be general and enables inter-cultural comparation (2) The definition has to be empirically useful. The two criteries has created controversy among experts when defining concepts of corruption. Desta (2006 : 426-427) said that various definitions on corruption divided into three categories: (1) public office centered definitions (2) marked centered definitions (3) public interest centered definitions. RESEARCH METODOLOGY This research was done with survey technique, using quantitative descriptive analysis with regression statistic analysis (figure 2). Descriptive method was used to explain the observed aspects as complete as possible and regression was used to see the influence of one independent variable or more to the dependent variable. Sugiyono (2003 : 3) stated that survey is a research done with a big and small population to determine distribution relative events and relationship between variables. Data used in this research are quantitative and qualitative data. The source of quantitative data was secondary data, where datas collected through books and field

documentations. Meanwhile, qualitative data was collected through questionnaire given to respondents. The questionnaire filled with datas from respondents, things they like and feel or what they have in mind, experiences and behaviors, in a closed questions besides the quesionnanire itself. OPERATIONAL VARIABLES Description: X1= Leadership (Independent Variable) X2= Controlling (Independent Variable) X3=Aparatur Professionalism (Independent Variable) X4= Financial Resources (Independent Variable) X5= Ethics and Feasibility (Independent Variable) X6=Participation of The Society (Independent Variable) Y= Effectivity of The Implementation of The Government which Free from Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (Dependent= Variable) Ε=Epsilon = Other factors outside X1,X2,X3,X4,X5, and X6 that influence Y but not included in the research. POPULATION AND SAMPLE The population and sample in this research was the

Riyadi 81

Table 3. Total of Population and Research Sample

Number Echelon Population (person) Percentage (%) Person

1 I dan II 96 25 24

2 III 409 25 102

3 IV 801 25 200

4 LSM BPKP BPR 153 25 38

Total 1459 364

government aparaturs City of Bogor or the civil servants in the Government City of Bogor, Commitee of Self Society (Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat) and respected figures of the society, all ranging from echelon I – IV, with total of 1459 people. Questionnaire was the method of data collecting. According to Arikunto (2002 : 140), questionnaire is written questions used to gather information from respondents or as their personal reports. Respondents completed the questionnaire by choosing one of five (5) answers provided, and put a check on the box. The instrument created for this research was based on the Likert Scale fo five choices scoring as follows: (a) Score 5 for ALWAYS (b) Score 4 for FREQUENTLY (c) Score 3 for RARELY (d) Score 2 for OCCASIONALLY (e) Score 1 for NEVER. DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE The researcher utilized descriptive analysis technique and inferential anaylsis technique, which will be explained further below. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE Descriptive analysis was utilized to calculate distribution of frequency, mean, standart deviation, modus and median, also making histogram of the scores of leadership, controlling, aparatur professionalism, financial resources, ethics and feasibility, participation of the society and also the score of the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion, and nepotism. INFERENTIAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE The purpose of this technique was to get the conclusion

of hypothesis test with generalization. With this technique, data analysing came through several phase: (1) data tabulation of respondents’s answers; (2) making distribution of frequency from respondent’s asnwers; (3) calculating mean, median, and modus; (4) test the influences between independent variables and dependent variables. Steps taken in this research are:

1. Data Description 2. Validity and Reiliability test 3. Classic Assumption Test a. Data Normality Test, b. Multicolinearity 4. Linear Regression Analysis The regression equation used in data analysis method: a. Simple Linear Regression Analysis Ŷ = a + bXi b. Double Linear Regression Analysis Ŷ = a + bX1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3 + b4 X4 + b5 X5+ b6 X6 5. Coefficient of Determination a. Coefficient of simple determination KD = r

2

b. Coefficient of double determination. Analysis of double determination (R

2) was being used to know the changes

of Dependent Variables in percentage, that is the Effectivity of the Implementation of The Government which Free From Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (Y), with each Independent Variables: Leadership (X1), Controlling (X2), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Financial Resources (X4), Ethics and Feasibility (X5), and The Participation of The Society (X6). 6. Hypothesis Test Hypothesis test designed with level of significance 5% or P = 0,05, by implementing one or two sided test. For a simple linear coefficient of regression

significance test , the applied hypothesis are: Ho : = 0

(insignificant coefficient of regression) Ha : > 0 (significant coefficient of regression) Criteria of the hypothesis test as follows: If t test score < t table score, = Ho accepted If t test score > t table score, = Ho rejected To test the total significance of the regression equation

using F test formula, the applied hypothesis are: Ho : 1

...6 = 0 (There is no significant influence of X variable to

Y) Ho : 1 ... 6 > 0 (There is a significant influence of X variable to Y) Criteria of the hypothesis test as follows: If F test score < F table score, = Ho accepted If F test score

> F table score, = Ho accepted Collected datas was analyzed with SPSS for MS Windows Release 17.0 and Microsoft Excel for Windows. HYPOTHESIS DESIGN RESULT AND DISCUSSION The object of this research is the Government city of Bogor. Administratively, Bogor is surrounded by Regioncy of Bogor and also becomes a growth center of Bogor Raya. Based on Regional Law Number 1 Year 2000 about the Region Constructive Planning (Year 1999-2009), Bogor is the city of: trading, industry, settlement, and science tour. On context of region, Bogor is (1) the development center in Area VII which serves regioncy of Bogor, Sukabumi, and Cianjur; (2) city for the homes of 1,5 million people in 2010, as a way to handle density problems in JABODETABEK; (3) city to accomodate international agendas besides Jakarta. With its strategic position and the relatively comfortable natural condition, Bogor has become a alternative for citizens and wanderers from other areas as an alternative to earn a living besides Jakarta. Such condition gives a broad affect to Bogor on its social economy structure and others. The influence of leadership (x1) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (y) The first hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of Leadership to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the more effective the Leadership, the effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Leadership positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00 and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Leadership positively influence the The Effectivity of

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 82 Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is

0,196. This indicates that 19,6% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by Leadership, and the other 80,4 % is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b1X1) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 2,428 and regression coefficient 0,364. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 2,428 + 0,364X1. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of Leadership variable (X1) affects the Leadership variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 2,428 + 0,364 = 2,792, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant. Beta Coefficents score on Leadership variable X1 is 0,443. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of Leadership variable X1 will increase 0,443 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y). The influence of controlling (x2) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (y) The second hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of Controlling to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the more effective the Controlling, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Controlling positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00 and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates

Riyadi 83 that Controlling positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is

0,183. This indicates that 18,3% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by Controlling, and the other 81,7% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b2X2) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 2,562 and regression coefficient 0,336. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 2,562 + 0,336X2. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of Controlling variable (X2) affects the Controlling variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 2,562 + 0,336 = 2,898, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant. Beta Coefficents score on Controlling variable X2 is 0,428. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of Controlling variable X2 will increase 0,428 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y).

The influence of aparatur professionalism (x3) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (y) The third hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of Aparatur Professionalism to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the more effective the Aparatur Professionalism, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Aparatur Professionalism positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00

and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Aparatur Professionalism positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is

0,233. This indicates that 23,3% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by Aparatur Professionalism, and the other 76,7% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b3X3) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 2,411 and regression coefficient 0,389. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 2,411 + 0,389X3. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of Aparatur Professionalism variable (X3) affects the Aparatur Professionalism variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 2,411 + 0,389 = 2,800, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant.

Beta Coefficents score on Aparatur Professionalism variable X3 is 0,482. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of Aparatur Professionalism X3 will increase 0,482 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y). the influence of financial resources (x4) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (Y) The fourth hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of Financial Resources to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the more effective the use Financial Resources, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Financial Resources positively influence the effectivety

of implementation of the Government free from corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00 and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Financial Resources positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is 0,251. This indicates that

25,1% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by Financial Resources, and the other 74,9% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b4X4) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 2,515 and regression coefficient 0,367. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 2,515 + 0,367X4. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of Financial Resources variable (X4) affects the Financial Resources variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 2,515 + 0,367 = 2,982, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant. Beta Coefficents score on Financial Resources variable X4 is 0,501. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of Financial Resources variable X4 will increase 0,501 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y). the influence of ethics and feasibility (x5) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (Y) The fifth hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of Ethics and Feasibility to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the higher the Ethics and Feasibility, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted.

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 84 The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Ethics and Feasibility positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00 and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that Ethics and Feasibility positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is

0,271. This indicates that 27,1% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by Ethics and Feasibility, and the other 72,9% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b5X5) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 2,283 and regression coefficient 0,428. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 2,283 + 0,428X5. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of Ethics and Feasibility variable (X5) affects the Ethics and Feasibility variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 2,283 + 0,428 = 2,711, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant. Beta Coefficents score on Ethics and Feasibility variable X5 is 0,521. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of Ethics and Feasibility variable X5 will increase 0,521 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y). the influence of the participation of the society (x6) to the effectivity of implementation of the government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in government of Bogor city province of West Java (Y) The sixth hypothesis tested in this research is: “There is an Influence of the Participation of The Society to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Which Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java, which means the higher the Participation of The Society, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from

Riyadi 85 Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The calculation shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that the Participation of The Society positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. The t test result is calculated with SPSS version 17.00 and creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that the Participation of The Society positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is

0,423. This indicates that 42,3% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by the Participation of The Society, and the other 57,7% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the Equation of Simple Linear Regression (Ŷ = a + b6X6) was obtained with the constanta coefficent 1,488 and regression coefficient 0,461. Based on that figures, the equation of regression is: Ŷ = 1,488 + 0,461X6. The Equation of Regression indicates that each 1 score of the Participation of The Society variable (X6) affects the Participation of The Society variable, which positively influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 1,488 + 0,616 = 2,104, with assumption that scores of other variables are constant. Beta Coefficents score on the Participation of The Society variable X6 is 0,621. This indicates that the increase of every 1 standart deviation of the Participation of The People variable X6 will increase 0,621 standart deviation of Effectivity of implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Variable (Y). the influence of leadership (x1), controlling (x2), aparatur professionalism (x3), financial resources (x4), ethics and feasibility (x5) and participation of the society (x6) to the effectivity of implementation of government which free from corruption, collusion and nepotism of government in Bogor city (Y) The seventh hypothesis tested in this research is: “There

is an Influence of Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and the Participation of The Society to The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java. This means the more effective the Leadership and the Controlling, the more professional the Aparatur, the higher the Financial Resources, the higher the Ethics and Feasibility and The Participation of The Society, the Effectivity of implementation of the government free from Corruption Collusion Nepotism in government of Bogor City is increasing. The F test result is applied with criteria; if F calculation < F table then; Ho rejected and Ha accepted. The result shows that score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted. This indicates that the Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and the Participation of The Society altogether positively influence The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Hypothesis testing with t test is a way to recognize the influence of each variables partially, which are Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and the Participation of The Society altogether influence

The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City. The t test result creates score Sig.000 < α = 0,05; so Ho rejected and Ha accepted, applied to all variables.This indicates that the Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and the Participation of The Society (with each variable partially) positively influence the The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City, which means the hypothesis is significant. Based on the data processed with SPSS version 17.00, the result of Coefficient of Determination Test (R

2) is 0,624. This indicates that

62,4% The Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is determined by the Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and Participation of The Society. Meanwhile the other 37,6% is influenced by another factors. Based on the data collected with questionnaires, the Equation of Double Linear Regression is as follows: Ŷ = a + b1 + X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3 + b4 X4 + b5 X5+ b6 X6 Ŷ = 0,093 + 0,147X1 +

0,066X2 + 0,243X3 + 0,040X4 + 0,216X5 + 0,394X6 The Equation indicates that : Each 1 score of the Leadership variable (X1) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,147 with assumption that scores of other variables: Controlling (X2), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Financial Resources (X4), Ethics and Feasibility (X5), and Participation of The Society (X6) are constant. Each 1 score of the Controlling variable (X2) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,066 with assumption that scores of other variables: Leadership (X1), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Financial Resources (X4), Ethics and Feasibility (X5), and Participation of The Society (X6) are constant. Each 1 score of the Aparatur Professionalism variable (X3) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,243 with assumption that scores of other variables: Leadership (X1), Controlling (X2), Financial Resources (X4), Ethics and Feasibility (X5), and Participation of The Society (X6) are constant. Each 1 score of the Financial Resources variable (X4) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,040 with assumption that scores of other variables: Leadership (X1), Controlling (X2), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Ethics and Feasibility (X5), and Participation of The Society (X6) are constant. Each 1 score of the Ethics and Feasibility variable (X5) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,216 with assumption that scores of other variables: Leadership (X1), Controlling (X2), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Financial Resources (X4), and Participation of The Society (X6) are constant. Each 1 score of the Participation of The Society variable (X6) influences the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City (Y) as much as 0,394 with assumption that scores of other variables: Leadership (X1), Controlling (X2), Aparatur Professionalism (X3), Financial Resources (X4), and Ethics and Feasibility (X5) are constant. Beta Coefficents score on the variable of Leadership (X1) is 0,179; the score on the variable of Controlling (X2) is 0,082; the score on the variable of Aparatur Professionalism (X3) is 0,301; the score on the variable of Financial Resources (X4) is 0,055; the score on the variable of Ethics and

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 86 Feasibility (X5) is 0,262; the score on the variable of Participation of The Society (X3) is 0,416. Based on Beta Coefficents score, the main variable influencing the Effectivity of Implementation of the Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City is Participation of The Society (X6) with score 0,416, and the others variables as supporting factors. Participation of the Society also positively and significantly influence the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City as much as 42,3%, this also indicates that society still plays an important role for the government to solve their problems. Statistics shows each variables, either individually or altogether contributed and significantly influence the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City where Leadership contributes 19,6%, Controlling 18,3%, Aparatur Professionalism 23,3%, Financial Resources 25,1%, Ethics and Feasibility 27,1%, and the Participation of The Society 42,3%. This means if the six factors are in a supportive condition to each other, the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City will increase. On the contrary, if the six factors are not in a supportive condition to each other, the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City will increase. The frequency of distribution shows that The Independent Variables significantly influence the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City. Still on frequency of the distribution, the variable score of the Effectivity Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City shows that this variable plays an important role. Therefore, factors of the Effectivity of Implementation of The Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City has positive response to the implementation of the regional government. CONCLUSION Based on the research, the author concluded that each independent variables of this research (Leadership, Controlling, Aparatur Professionalism, Financial Resources, Ethics and Feasibility, and Participation of the Society) positively and significantly influence the effectivity of implementation of the Government which

Riyadi 87 free from corruption, collusion and nepotism in Government of Bogor City Province of West Java. From this result we can perceive that the more effective the leadership, the better the controlling as well as the aparatur professionalism, the higher the ethics and feasibility as well as the participation of the society, it will increase the effectivity of implementation of the Government Free From Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Government of Bogor City.

Those factors are highly associated with each other in the implementation of the regional government. From the implication of the research, the following suggestion can be conveyed. First, leaders at the field of service in the Government City of Bogor constantly needs to improve their leadership capacity consists of competency development and Emotional Spiritual Quotient (ESQ) to increase the quality of human resources. Second, making a long-middle-short term work programme as well as creating the activities scale of priority can be done to improve the responsivity of the aparaturs. Third, the employees should be given a broad chance yet motivation to update their knowledge and skills which relates to the advance of technology and science, also gain confidence and self-development of the aparaturs. Fourth, in depth socialization as well as the re-implication of organizational value needs to be done to reach organizational goals. Fifth, professionalism of the aparaturs for the sake of giving excellent service to the community needs to be intensified through courses, education and training, and learning tasks. Sixth, exact agendas and priorities are needed to eradicate corruption, such as giving serious punishment to the corruptors, campaigning on corruption as social virus, giving the press a freedom to expose corruption cases, implementing reformation of bureaucracy, familiarizing guilty feelings, also applying an open and effective controlling system. Seventh, for further study, the researcher recommends to acquire a broader and carefully selected sample of aparaturs in Bogor. The researcher also suggest human resource associated with budget compiling principles as other variables to be examined. Last, this research hopefully useful for improving the management of literature, especially in the field of government management. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors acknowledge; Prof. Dr. Ir. H. Soenardjo Wirjoprawiro, M.Si. Rector of Satyagama University Jakarta, Indonesia. Prof. Dr. Josy Adiwisastra, Drs. Head of Doctoral Studies, Science of Goverment Management

at Satyagama University Jakarta, Indonesia. Prof. Dr. R. Hendra Halwani, MA. Professor at Satyagama University Jakarta, Indonesia. Prof. Dr. H.E. Koswara Kertapradja, MA. Professor at Satyagama University Jakarta, Indonesia. Prof. Dr. Ir. H. Musa Hubeis, MS., Dipl.Ing. DEA. Professor at Bogor Agricultural University West Java, Indonesia REFERENCES Arikunto, S. (2002). Research Procedure of a Practice

Approach.Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta. Maheka, A. (2000). Understanding and Eradicating Corruption, 1st

Edition.Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) RI. Jakarta, [t.t]. Basyaib, H., Holloway, R., Makarim, N.A. (Editor). (2002).Stealing

Society Fund: 16 Corruption Analysis in Indonesia.Mencuri Uang Rakyat. Book 1-4. Jakarta: Yayasan Aksara.

Cahyono (2003). Management. Jakarta: Gramedia 2007. Gibson, I.D. (2005). Organizations. Richard D. Irwin. Inc. Handayaningrat, S.(2005). Study of Administration and Management,

Sixth Edition. Jakarta: PT Gunung Agung. Klitgaard, R. (1998a). “International Cooperation Against Corruption”,

Finance and Development. 35(1). Mardiasmo (2002). Autonomy and Management of Regional

Fund.Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Prime Dimensions in Science of Country Administration (1992). Jakarta:

Raja Grafindo Persada. Indonesian Bureaucracy in the Era of Globalization (1998). Jakarta:

Batang Gadis. Pamudji, S. (2005). Government Leadership in Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi

Aksara. Sianipar (2001). Mangement of Society Service. Jakarta: Lembaga

Administrasi Negara. Stoner, James A.F., Wankel, C., 2006. Management, Third Edition.

USA, Engelwood Cliffs: Prenitce Hall. Suwandi, I.M. (2001). “Strategic Issues of Regional Autonomy

Structuring” dalam Berita Iptek. November 3, 2001. Terry. 2004. Management. USA: Prentice Hall. Widjajabrata, S. and Zacchea, N.M. (2004). “International Corruption:

The Republic of Indonesia is Strengthening the Ability of Its Auditors to Battle Corruption.”

Wijaya. (2004). Regional Autonomy and Autonomous Region. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yulk, G. (2001). Leadership in Organization, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall (Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi), Terjemahan. 2007. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

REGULATION OF LEGISLATION Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Number 19 Year 2000 date April 5, 2000 about Criminal Act Joint Team of Eradicating Corruption. (LN RI 2000 No. 43, TLN RI No.3948). Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Number 71 Year 2000 date August 21, 2000 about Instruction of Role Applying and Society and Reward Giving in Prevention and Eradicating Corruption Criminal Act.(LN RI 2000 No. 144, TLN RI No. 3995). President Decree Number 150 year 1959 date July 5, 1959 about President Decree/Indonesian Army Commander in Chief about Reenact to Constitution of 1945. (LN RI 1959 No. 75) Republic of Indonesia President Instruction Number 5 year 2004 date December 9, 2004 about Corruption Eradiction Acceleration.

Scholarly J. Bus. Admin. 88 Bogor's Municipal Regulation Number 5 year 2010, Long Term Development Planning Municipalities of Bogor Year 2010-2014. Major of Bogor Regulation Number 22 year 2009 about Mid Term Development Planning of Bogor Municipalities year 2010-2014. Government Regulation Number 8 year 2008 about Procedures of Compilation, Controlling and Evaluating Plan Application of Government Development.