THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY
description
Transcript of THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY
THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY
By Tomislav Prokopec
Publications: Tomas Janssen and T. Prokopec, arXiv:0707.3919;Tomas Janssen, Shun-Pei Miao & T. Prokopec, in preparation.
Nikhef, Amsterdam, 18 Dec 2007
˚ 1˚
The cosmological constant problem
μν μν μν2 4
(vacuum matter)gravitationalgeometry energy momentumcoupling tensor
8 G ˆG (g) g = Tc c
(μ,ν =0,1,2,3)
˚ 2˚
Vacuum fluctuates and thereby contributes to the stress-energy tensor of the vacuum (Casimir 1948):
vac vac geom vacobs 2
8 G(T ) g
c
COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT PROBLEM: The expected energy density of the vacuum
A finite volume V = L³ in momentum space constitutes reciprocal lattice: each point of the lattice is a harmonic oscillator with the ground state energy E/2, where E²=(cp)²+(mc²)².
Through Einstein’s equation this vacuum energy curves space-time such that it induces an accelerated expansion:
4 76 4vac Pl~m ~10 GeV
2 -46 40obs Pl~(H m ) ~10 GeV
is about 122 orders of magnitude larger than the observed value:
Cosmic inflation●a period of accelerated expansion of the primordial
Universe
EVIDENCE for inflation:▪a nearly scale invariant spectrum of cosmological
perturbations
▪gaussianity of CMBR fluctuations
▪a near spatial flatness of the Universe
Temperature fluctuations of CMBR
˚ 3˚
CMBR power spectrum (WMAP
3year, 2006)
Scalar inflationary models
3 ( ) 0,H V
2 22
26 Pl
mH
M
●EOM for a classical scalar field (t) in an expanding Universe
● in the slow roll paradigm d²/dt²can be neglected. Take V’=m², then the FRIEDMANN EQUATION:
,23
0 tmM Pl
,6
)(
PlM
tmH
2 20
0 exp 066 PL
m t m ta a a
M
SOLUTION:
˚ 4˚
Guth 1981, Starobinsky 1980
SCALAR FIELD TRAJECTORY
V()
H = expansion rate, V=scalar potential
Graceful exit problem
●Inflation realised in de Sitter space with cosmological term Λ₁, which after tunnelling reduces to Λ₀ 0.
Upon tunnelling, bubbles form and grow, but INFLATION does not complete: the growth of the false vacuum Λ₁ wins
over that of the true vacuum Λ₀ 0.
tunneling Λ₀
Λ1
THE GRACEFUL EXIT PROBLEM:
The graceful exit problem would be solved if Λ would be (in part) compensated
by quantum effects resulting in a decreasing effective Λeff=Λ(t).
I SHALL ARGUE: The one loop scalar field fluctuations do precisely that!
˚ 5˚
Guth 1981, Linde 1982
Scalar field one loop effective action
When the determinant is evaluated in a FLRW space, it leads to a backreaction that compensates Λ.
ONE LOOP (MASSLESS) SCALAR FIELD EFFECTIVE ACTION:
˚ 6˚
DIAGRAMMATICALLY 1 LOOP(vacuum bubble):
NB: Can be calculated from knowing the relevant propagator.
NB: Propagators are not known for general spaces; now known for FLRW spaces.Janssen & Prokopec 2007
[ ] [ ] [ ]
1/ 2
1loop contribution
1[ ] [ ] ln
2[ ]
i iS iS ie D e e S Tr g
Det g
..][ 24 gxdS
Scalar backreaction in FLRW spaces
8 6 72
2 3
3 1100 : 3 8 0
2 2 4N
N
G H H H HH G
H H H
The quantum Friedmann equations from 1 loop scalar field fluctuations:
● When solved for the expansion rate H (with Λ=0), one gets:
˚ 7˚
6 7
300 : 2 8 ( ) 4 0
2N
N
G H H Hii H G p
H H
NB1: Λeff (probably) does not drop fast enough to explain dark energy
1/ 3
13
3 4NGH t t
At late times t (today), H drops as
2 / 3eff
23
( )4NGt t t
NB2: Minkowski space is the late time attractor (NOT the classical H²=/3)
Classical (de Sitter) attractor
Quantum behaviour
Janssen & Prokopec 2007
Validity of the backreaction calculationOur approximation is valid when -d/dt<<H
[=(dH/dt)/H²]:
˚ 8˚
NB: The condition -d/dt << H is met (uniformly) when w<-1/3
H
Classical (de Sitter space) attractor
Quantum (Minkowski space) attractor
w=/p=0
Gaviton backreaction in FLRW spacesThe quantum Friedmann equations from 1 loop graviton
fluctuations:
● When solved for the expansion rate H (with Λ=0), one gets:
0ln2
2183:00
20
222
H
HHHGGH NN
˚ 9˚
00 : 2 8 ( ) 0Nii H G p
p
wtw
H
HHG
w
H N
,
2
)1(31ln
2
)1(211
0
at early times t0 (Big Bang), H is limited by approximately Planck mass(probably a perturbation theory artefact).
at late times t (e.g. today), H gets slightly reduced. H²Λ/3 is still late time attractor, albeit slightly increased. The scale factor a approaches the de Sitter exponential expansion, albeit it gets slightly reduced (there is a small `delay time’).
Janssen, Miao& Prokopec 2007
20 0.1NG H
quantum
classical
maxH
The luminosity vs distance relation for distant Type Ia supernovae reveals: the Universe is expanding at an accelerated pace:
˚10˚Dark energy and acceleration
DARK ENERGY (Λeff) causes acceleration
->
Perlmutter; Riess 1998
Evidence: distant supernovae appear fainter than they would in a decelerating Universe, implying accelerated expansion
0az( t)= -1
a( t)
Λ causes a (tiny) repulsive force which increases with distance: must be measured at cosmological distances
Dark energy and cosmological constantDark energy has the characteristics of a cosmological constant Λeff, yet its origin is not known
˚11˚
But why is Λeff so small?
UNKNOWN SYMMETRY?
GRAVITATIONAL BACKREACTION!?
OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS: scalar (matter) fields PERHAPS! (though unlikely)but not the gravitons! (awaits confirmation from a 2 loop calculation: hard) [Tsamis, Woodard, ~1995]
EXPLANATION?
Summary and discussionWe have learned that:
The (scalar) matter VACUUM fluctuations in an accelerating universe induce strong quantum backreaction at the one loop order; gravitons do not. These vacuum fluctuations may be the key for understanding the vacuum structure of inflationary models, and the origin of dark energy.
˚12˚
Q: How these scalar and graviton vacuum fluctuations affect the inflationary dynamics? (in progress with Ante Bilandžić, Nikhef]
Physicists measure routinely effects of vacuum fluctuations in accelerator experiments
˚13˚Measuring vacuum fluctuations
E.g. Fine structure constant (strength of em interactions)
2
e
e 1=
4 c 137becomes stronger when electrons and photons in Compton scattering have larger energy
Compton scattering
charge screening of an electron: at higher energies, one “sees” more of the negative electric charge