THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SPECIAL CAPITAL CITY OF JAKARTA...

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SPECIAL CAPITAL CITY OF JAKARTA PROVINCE

OFFICE OF WATER MANAGEMENT

Jl. Taman Jatibaru No. 1 Tel. 3803302 – 3865546 – 3845266

JAKARTA

REVISED REPORT OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (LARAP)

Location

KRUKUT – CIDENG, KRUKUT LAMA

TANAH SAREAL SUB DISTRICT, TAMBORA SUB DISTRICT TAMBORA DISTRICT

KRUKUT SUB DISTRICT TAMAN SARI DISTRICT WEST JAKARTA

AND

PETOJO UTARA SUB DISTRICT GAMBIR DISTRICT CENTRAL JAKARTA

Revised in July 2015

Translated base on: Doc. Ref: 4928/-1.793.2

July 14, 2015 Revised: August 21, 2015

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (LARAP)

KRUKUT CIDENG AND KRUKUT LAMA DRAINS

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................ 1

1.2. Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 1

1.3. Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 2

II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................. 3

2.1. Project Location .................................................................................................................... 3

2.2. Project Activity Plan .............................................................................................................. 3

III. CHARACTERISTICS OF PEOPLE, LAND AND BUILDING TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ...... 4

3.1. Description of Land Affected by the Project .......................................................................... 4

3.2. Description of Structures Affected by the Project ................................................................. 5

3.3. Description of Project Affected People (PAPs) ...................................................................... 6

IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ...................................................................................... 12

4.1. Policy of Government of DKI Jakarta ................................................................................... 12

4.2. Legal Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 13

4.3. Institutions .......................................................................................................................... 21

4.4. Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................................. 24

4.5. Complain Handling .............................................................................................................. 25

4.6. Resettlement Implementation Work Plan ........................................................................... 26

TABLES

Table 1 : Summary of Land Affected by the Project

Table 2 : Summary of Structures Affected by the Project

Table 3 : Summary of Profile of Project Affected People

Table 4 : Summary of Economic Activuty of Project Affected Person

Table 5 : Summary of Economic Condition of Project Affected People

Table 6 : Summary of Facilities and Infrastructure of the Project Affected People

Table 7 : Summary of Public Perception and Aspiration of the Project Affected People

Table 8 : Summary of Vulnerable Groups and Students

Table 9 : Implementation of Land Acquisition Timeline

Table 10 : Implementing Agencies of Resettlement of Project Affected People

at the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Drains



ii

Table 11 : The Work Plan of Handling PAPs in Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub

Project

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 : Photos Condition of Project Location

Attachment 2A : Work site Activities Plan

Attachment 2B : Sample Crossection surrounding Project Affected People

Attachment 3 : List of Project Affected People and Asset

Attachment 4 : Sketch of Project Affected People site

Attachment 5 : Summary of Structures and Project Affected People

Attachment 6 : Governor of DKI Jakarta Instruction No. 48/2014 on Implementation

of Resettlement of the JEDI Project Affected People

Attachment 7 : Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation No. 111/2014 on Mechanism

of Inhabited Rusunawa.

Attachment 8 : Workplan Handling Project Affected People

Attachment 9 : Presentation of Working Group on Orderly Residential Housing and

Government Building of DKI Jakarta.



1

I. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

Jakarta flood control requires massive rehabilitation of rivers/drains, canals and dams. The

rehabilitation has to be accompanied by flood management plan to ensure the system works

optimally. The simulation result post flooded 2007 shows that the physical work in 12 main

rivers/drains / canals and 4 dams in Jakarta by restoring the flood control systems and

functions according to the initial design is predicted to reduce by 40% the inundated area or

to secure 1 million residents of Jakarta. With regard to that issue, the DKI Jakarta Provincial

Government, the Government of Indonesia (GoI)– in this matter the Mininstry of Public Works

of the Republic of Indonesia and the World Bank entered into cooperation for dealing with

the flood through Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project (JUFMP) /Jakarta Emergency

Dredging Initiative Proyek (JEDI). The rivers (kali) /drains/ canals and dams (waduk) included

in the project are, among others, Upper Sunter, Lower Sunter, Cengkareng Drain, Ciliwung-

Gunung Sahari Drain, Sentiong-Sunter Drain, Waduk Melati, Cideng-Thamrin Drain, Waduk

South Sunter, Waduk East Sunter III, Waduk North Sunter, Lower Angke Drain, Tanjungan

Drain, West Flood Canal, Grogol-Sekretaris Drain, Pakin-Kali Besar- Jelakeng Drain and Krukut

– Cideng Drain.

However, the dredging of rivers/drains/ canals in Jakarta may lead to potential social impacts

in the form of resettlement of the residents of the areas to be dredged. The potential impacts

are found in people occupying state land in the Krukut-Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project.

In order to deal with this issue, the DKI Jakarta Government, in this matter the Project

Implementaton Unit (PIU) of the Water Management Office (before Public Works Office) has

prepared the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARAP) Document in the Krukut Cideng

and Krukut Lama Sub Project.

1.2. Potential Impacts

The potential impacts of the sheet pile activites and dredging of Krukut Cideng-Krukut Lama

Sub project on the structures include loss of houses. Below is the explanation of the impacts.

a. Activities requiring land acquisition

In 2010, the Ministry of Public Works (now Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing)

of Republic of Indonesia prepared DED and LARAP documents. The LARAP documents

concluded that the dredging and sheet pile installations are located along the drain flow

area or State land. Residents occupying the Krukut- Cideng area that will be affected by



2

the project (PAPs) are categorized as "Incroachers and Squatters". They use the land of

the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama drains for houses, public/social facilities and other

businesses. They have been utilizing the land for more than 2 years, even some of them

for more than 40 years. Some of them state that they are the native people inhabiting the

area for generations.

b. Locations of Affected Structurs

Incroachers and Squatters of the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project constitute

an issue that should be addressed in the Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project-JUFMP /

Jakarta Emergency Dredging Initiative - JEDI project activities. The affected structures are

located in the wet area of The Krukut Cideng Sub Project, including those built hanging on

water. If the dredging and sheet pile installation will be done, they have to relocated. The

structures that will be affected by the projects vary; some of them are permanent, semi

permanent and non permanent (temporary) structures. Some structures in the Krukut

Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project are two or even three-storied.

1.3. Objectives

The objective of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARAP) is to explain the

principles, procedures and methods of organization to be implemented in the land acquisition

and resettlement, namely:

a. To specifically explain the options of compensation for the Project Affected People (PAPs);

b. To specifically determine the assistances for resettlements and special assistance;

c. To specifically determine the work plan for the implementation of land acquisition and

resettlements.



3

II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

2.1. Project Location

The Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project located in 10 (ten) sub districts (Kelurahan)

that include:

a. Krukut, Keagungan and Glodok Sub Districts, Taman Sari Districts, West Jakarta

b. Tanah Sereal and Tambora Sub Districts, Tambora District, West Jakarta

c. Duri Pulo, Petojo Utara, Petojo Selatan, Cideng and Gambir Sub Districts, Gambir District,

Central Jakarta

Out of the aforementioned 10 (ten) sub District, 4 (four) sub districts are included in the LARAP

activities because there are peope directly affected by the planning (DED) in the project

location where the sheet pile will be built, namely:

a. Krukut Sub District, Taman Sari District, West Jakarta

b. Tanah Sereal and Tambora Sub Districts, Tambora District, West Jakarta

c. Petojo Utara Sub District, Gambir District, Central Jakarta

2.2. Project Activity Plan

The dredging of the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project through the Jakarta

Emergency Dredging Initiative (JEDI) is planned to dredge an area with the length of 6,700 m

with the expected dredged volume of 41,410 m3. The embankment repairing will be as long

as 4,000 m. The activity will be commenced in September 2015.

The Activity Plan Location photos and figures are given in Attachment 1 and 2.



4

III. CHARACTERISTICS OF PEOPLE, LAND AND BUILDING TO BE AFFECTED BY

THE PROJECT

Based on the draft LARAP documents prepared by the Directorate General of Water Resources

of the Ministry of Public Works of the Republic of Indonesia in 2010, the Office of Public Works

DKI Jakarta conducted survey data update in October-December 2013. The re-survey of the

Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project indicates that 225 families (726 people) have

plotted and used the land on 225 plots that include (i) 224 plots for structures (for

houses/business/public-social facilities and (ii) 1 plot for farming/plantation. The condition of

land, structures/assets is described below.

3.1. Description of Land Affected by the Project

The total plots of land in the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project inhabited by the

people were 225 plots with the total area of 4,039 m2, with the widest area of 120 m2 and

the narrowest was 2 m2. T land ownership as follows: (i) 60 (26.67%) HH declared themselves

as tenants (penggarap), (ii) respectively 153 (68.00%) declared as land owners, renters (lessee

and recipient of land tenants transfered) and public/social facilities and (iii) 12 (5.33%) could

not be met/were unknown.

Out of 225 land plots controlled, 29 plots were legally supported by Use Rights certificate

(12.89%) while the remaining 196 plots (87.11%) were either state land. With regard to land

ownership in other places, 8 (3.56%) of the settlers responded that they “have land

elsewhere”, and 11 (4.89%) did not answer. Meanwhile, with regard to the method of how to

get land, 158 (70.22%) responded “miscellaneous”, 47 (20.89%) replied by “buying”, 4 (1.78%)

replied by “grant”, and 16 (7.11%) provided no answer. Meanwhile, the land use is as follows:

39 (17.33%) is used as farming land and public facilities, 14 (6.22%) as business sites, 18

(8.00%) as miscellaneous and 154 (68.44%) as houses. The aforementioned description is

recapped in this table:



5

Table 1: Summary of Land Affected by the Project

No Land Description Respondents’ Responses and percentage (%)

1. Land ownership status

State land Own Rights

196/87% 29/13%

2 Land ownership elsewhere

Yes No Did not reply

8/4% 206/91% 11/5%

3. Land acquisition method

Purchasing grant Miscellaneous Did not reply

47/21% 4/2% 158/70% 16/7%

4. Utilization Houses Business Farming Vacant Public/Social facilities

miscellaneous

154/68% 14/6% 1/1% 38/17% 18/8%

From the description and the table above, it can be noted that 87% of the land used by houses

in the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project is State Land and without the permission of

the competent institution.

3.2. Description of Structures Affected by the Project

Structures assets that will be affected by the project are as follows: from 225 plots of land

controlled by residents, there are 142 structures which include: (i) 94 plots (67%) are used as

houses, (ii) 25 plots (11%) as houses and business, (iii) 12 plots (5%) are used as

business/office (iv) 38 plots (17%) as public/social facilities consisting of RW post, security

post, mosque, etc used for public purposes.

The quality of structures along the riverbanks of the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub

Project are mostly permanent structures with two or three stories, some are "shacks" with

dirt and / or solid clay floors with the walls made of waste materials, such as plywood, zinc

and board. The structures condition varies, some of them are permanent, semi permanent

and non permanent. The most extensive area is about 120 m2 and the smallest area controlled

is 2 m2 with the average area of 24 m2.

Table 2. Summary of Structures Affected by the Project

No. Form of Loss Total Remarks

1. Houses 149 (67%) Varied, some are permanent, semi permanent and non permanent structures

2. Houses and small shop 25 (11%)

3. Small shop 12 (5%)

4. Barn and ponds 0(0.00%)

5. Public/social facilities 38 (17%) RW post, security post, mosque etc

TOTAL : 225 (100%)



6

3.3. Description of Project Affected People (PAPs)

3.3.1. Profile of Project Affected People (PAPs)

Profiles of the Project affected People (PAPs) by the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub

Project are as follows:

By sex consisting of: (i) 145 males (64%), 42 females (19%) and 38 (17%) did not answer

(unknown/public/social facilities).

By age 60 residents (27%) are aged between 40 and 50 years old, 49 residents (22%) are aged

between 50 and 55 years, 36 residents (16%) are aged more than 55 years, 34 residents (15%)

are aged between 30 and 40 years, 6 residents (2%) are aged between 20 and 30 years and 40

residents (18%) did not answer (unknown/public/social facilities).

Education: Most residents education is primary school / islamic primary school / equivalent

with 73 residents (32%), then 60 residents (27%) finished junior high school / islamic junior

school / equal, as many as 37 residents (16%) finished senior high school/Islamic senior high

school while 11 residents (5%) never went to school/did not finish elementary school and 44

residents (20%) did not answer (unknown/public/social facilities).

Main Occupation of the Family Head: Most PAPs or 64 residents (29%) work as

entrepreneurs/traders, respectively 30 residents (26%) work as private employees and

laborers, 25 residents (11%) work as homemakers, 21 residents (9%) work as scrap

collectors/unemployed, 5 residents (2%) work as Chaffeurs, 4 residents (2%) work as breeders

and 46 residents (21%) did not answer (unknown/public/social facilities). With regard to

marital status, 148 residents (66%) are married, 26 residents (12%) are widows and 3 residents

(1%) are widowers, 2 residents (1%) are 46 residents (20%) did not answer

(unknown/public/social facilities).

Origin and Population Status : 92 residents (41%) declared themselves as native couple, 76

residents (34%) declared themselves as non-native couples, the wife is native but the husband

is newcomer counts as many as 5 couples (2%) in total while the husband is native but the

wife is newcomer is 4 couples (2%) in total and 48 residents (21%) did not answer

(unknown/public/social facilities). With regard to ownership of Identity Cards, the following

data is obtained: 162 residents (72%) have ID Card according to the location, 12 residents (5%)

have DKI Jakarta ID Cards but their addresses do not match the project site, 3 residents (2%)

do not have ID card and 48 residents (21%) did not answer (unknown/public/social facilities).



7

Table 3. Summary of Profile of Project Affected People

No. Profile

Description PAPs Profile (Number and percentage) Re.

1. Sex Male Female 40 residents (18%) did not answer (unknown/ public/social facilities)

145 (64%) 42 (19%)

2. Age (year) 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-55 55

6(2%) 34(15%) 60(27%) 49(22%) 36(16%)

3. Education Never go to school

Finished elementary school/equal

Junior school/equal

High school

Post graduate

11(5%) 73(32%) 60(27%) 37(16%) -

4. Family head main occupations

Civil servant / Military/ Police

Housewife Private Employee

Farmer/ Breeder

- 25(11%) 30(26%) 4(2%)

Laborer Entrepreneur Others Chaffeur

- 64(29%) 21(9%) 5 (2%)

5. Marital status

Married Widower Widow Single

148(66%) 3(1%) 26(12%) 2(1%)

6. Origin Native couple Newcomer couple

Husband is native Wife is newcomer

Wife is native-husband is newcomer

92 (41%) 76 (34%) 4(2%) 5(2%)

7 ID Card No ID card ID card : address according to ID

ID does not match address

3(2%) 162(72%) 12(5%)

3.3.2. Economic Activity of Project Affected People

The residents in the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project also utilizing the river areas

for economic sites (additional income) such as breeding animals, collecting scraps, building

food stalls and basic need kiosks are 109 House Hold (48%) that are generally own-managed.

They stated they have no business elsewhere. With regard to their business plan if the

structures are affected by the project, they will : (i) remain doing business in the same location

(28%), (ii) open new business in new areas (16%) and close the business (5%). The following

table shows the resident’s economic activity.

Table 4. Summary of Economic Activuty of Project Affected Person

No. Description Survey Result

1. Businesses affected by the project

No answer/ no business/ public/ social facilities

Other business Basic needs kiosk, others

116 (52%) (0%) 109 (48%)

2. Business ownership Own business Profit sharing others

63 (28%) 7 (3%) 123 (55%)

3. Business elsewhere No Yes

103 (46%) 6 (3%)



8

4. Business plan after being affected by the project

Doing business in the same location

Making new business

Stop doing business

63 (28%) 35 (16%) 11 (5%)

3.3.3. Economic Condition of Project Affected People

Head of household of Project affected People earn a living as laborers, private employees,

collectors or scraps, traders and breeders. Out of 225 households, 25% of the total number

also has another family member as the provider of the household, 52% only have the family

heads as the providers and 22% did not answer/unknown/public/social facilities. Based on the

information provided by them, it is known that their income is Rp 1,000,000-Rp 2,000,000

/month (34%), followed by those having income of Rp 500,000 – Rp 1,000,000/month (26%) ,

those having income Rp 2,000,000 – Rp 3,000,000 / month (11%), those having income more

than Rp 3,000,000 (4%), those having income < Rp 500,000/month (2%) while the remaining

did not answer/ unknown/public/social facilities (23%). The estimate total monthly

expenditure is as follows: 37% of the households expend Rp 1,000,000 – 2,000,000 / month,

26% of the households expend Rp 500,000- 1,000,000 /month, 9% of the households expend

Rp 2,000,000 – 3,000,000 / month, 3% of the households expend more than Rp

3,000,000/month, 2 % household expend < Rp 500,000 / month and the remaining (23%) did

not answer/ unknown/public/social facilities. With regard to family transportation

expenditure, the following data is obtained: 28% of the households expend transportation

fare less than Rp 5,000/day, 24% of the households expend around Rp 5,000 – Rp 10,000 /

day, 19% of the households expend around Rp 10,000 – Rp 15,000 / day, 3% of the households

expend > RP 25,000 / day and respectively 3% of the households expend around Rp 15,000 –

Rp 20,000 / day and Rp 20,000 – Rp 25,000 / day for transportation fares. The remaining (23%)

no answer/ unknown/public/social facilities.

Table 5. Summary of Economic Condition of Project Affected People

No. Description Survey Result Remarks

1. Other family member than family head working

Yes No 51 (23%) resp did not answer/ unknown/ public/social facilities

56 (25%) 118 (52%)

2. Total Revenue (Rp/month) < 500,000 500,000-1 million 1 million-2 million

6(2%) 58(26%) 76(34%)

2-3 million >3 million

25(11%) 9 (4%)



9

No. Description Survey Result Remarks

3. Total expenditure (Rp/month)

< 500,000 500,000-1 million 1 million-2million

4 (2%) 59(26%) 84(37%)

2-3 million >3million

20(9%) 7 (3%)

4. Family transportation cost (Rp/day)

< 5,000 5,000 – 10,000 10,000 – 15,000

64 (28%) 53 (24%) 43 (19%)

15,000 – 20,000

20,000 – 25,000 > 25,000

4 (2%) 2 (1%) 7(3%)

3.3.4. Facilities and Infrastructure

With regard to electricity, most households or as many as 134 families (60%) use direct

connection from PLN, 75 (33%) use connections from their neighbors and 16 (7 %) answered

others (did not answer/do not use electricity). For drinking water, 72 (32%) use PAM (City

Water Service Company) in their houses, 55 (24%) use mineral water, 42 (19%) use PAM

connection from the neighbors, respectively 5 (2%) households use wells/jet pumps and

waters from vendors and 51 (22%) others (did not answer/ unknown/public/social facilities).

For sanitary, out of 225 households, 78 (35%) use PAM service in their houses, 72 (32%) use

PAM connection from the neighbors, 16 (7%) use wells/jet pumps and waters from vendors,

respectively 8 (3.5%) use public hydrant, mineral water, water from vendors, river waters and

rain waters while 51 (22%) answered others (no answer/ unknown/public/social facilities).

Table 6: Summary of Facilities and Infrastructure of the Project Affected People

No. Description Survey Result

1. Electricity Direct from PLN 134 (60%)

PLN from neighbors 75 (33%)

Others (no electricity) 16 (7%)

Generator

2. Drinking water Own PAM PAM from neighbors Mineral water Water from vendor

72 (32%) 42(19%) 55 (24%) 2 (1%)

Own well/pump 3 (2%)

River / dam - Others (no answer/ unknown/ public/social facilities)

51 (22%)

3. Sanitary facilities Own PAM connection 78 (35%)

PAM from neighbors 72 (32%)

Own well / pump 16 (7%)

Public hydrant, mineral water, water from vendors, river/rain water

8 (3.5%)

Others (no answer/ unknown /public/social facilities) 50 (22%)

4. Transportation Walk 71 (32%)

Own motorbike 62 (28%)

Public transport 29 (13%)

Bicycle 12 (5%)

Own car 2 (1%)

Others (no answer/ unknown/public/social facilities) 49 (21%)



10

With regard to sanitary facilities around the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project area,

82 (37%) households stated that have their own facilities, 73 (32%) stated that the facilities

are connected to drains, 20 (9%) use public facilities and 50 (22%) answered others (or did not

answer/ unknown/public/social facilities). Regarding means of transportation used by

households, 71 (32%) families said they only move around the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama

Sub Project resulting in they travel on foot, 62 (28%) households have own motorbikes, 29

(13%) use public transport, 12 (5%) use bicycles, 2 (1%) use car and 49 (21%) others (or no

answer/ unknown/public/social facilities).

3.3.5 Perceptions and Aspirations

Most or as many as 160 (71%) households occupying the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub

Project are already known of the existence / plan of JUFMP project wile 22 (10%) stated they

are unknown of it and 43 (19%) answered others (or did not answer/ public/social facilities).

77 (34%) households know the project from their friends/neighbors, 49 (22%) households

know from government apparatuses (district heads, sub district heads, RT/RW), 36 (16%)

households know from public figures and 63 (28%) stated others (did not answer/

public/social facilities). With regard to opinion if they have to be relocated to leased vertical

houses, as many as 155 (69%) households did not answer, as many as 50 (22%) answered

“agree” and the remaining 20 (9%) stated “disagree”.

Table 7. Summary of Public Perception and Aspiration of the Project Affected People

No Description Survey Result

1. Project Existence Know Do not know others (no answer/ public/social facilities)

160(71%) 22(10%) 43 (19%)

2. Information source

Friends/ Neighbors

Apparatus (District Head, Sub District Head, Head of Neighborhood/Family group)

Community leaders

101 (69%) 49 (22%) 36 (16%)

Media Others (did not answer/ unknown/public/social facilities).

63(28%)

3. Opinion if they have to be relocated to Rusunawa

No answer Agree Disagree

155 (69%) 50 (22%) 20 (9%)

4. Expectation/ Recommendation

No idea No building destruction

Be relocated to horizontal houses, not Rusunawa, do not make policies that bring troubles and make life more difficult to people

200(89%) 10(4%) 9(4%) Compensation and more expeditious process

Agree (to prevent flood and make a better life)

4(2%) 2(1%)



11

With regard to people’s expectation/ proposal in connection with the dredging and

installation of sheet pile at the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama sub project, 200 (89%)

housholds had no recommendation or did not answer, 10 (4%) households answered there

should be no building destruction and the remaining 7% answered they should be given

horizontal houses instead of vertical houses and the project should not bring problem to them.

They agree with the project to make their life better, they agree with the plan to give

compensation and agree with the project to prevent flood.

3.3.6. Vulnerable Groups and Students

Vulnerable groups in this description include those aged between 55 years and above and

those with difficult economic conditions for not working rendering them dependent on other

people. The economic condition indicator used is "Parameter Sayogyo", namely as follows: a

person is said to be below the poverty line if the annual income is equivalent to 480 kg of rice.

Assuming the rice price is Rp. 8000 / kg, then the people who earn less than Rp. 320,000 /

month or Rp. 1,280,000 household/ month are considered living below the poverty line.

Table 8: Summary of Vulnerable Groups and Students

No. Description Survey Results (residents)

1. Vulnerable groups Poor family Female family head

47 26

Old family head Not having land or houses elsewhere

9 68

2. Students Elementary school: 203 students Middle School : 109 students High School: 54 students

With regard to students who are forced to follow the move, the total estimate is 366 students

(male and female). They are the children who still need education and their parents cannot

afford it.



12

IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

4.1. Policy of Government of DKI Jakarta

Dredging of rivers/drains, canals and dams in DKI Jakarta, including the Krukut Cideng and

Krukut Lama Drains is an effort to reduce flooding while restoring functions of drains / canals

and dams, where the banks of Drain /Canal and Dam occupied by structures will be restored.

In the effort to reclaim land around the Rivers/Drains / Canals and Dams, the Government

shall not provide cash compensation for the land, structures and other assets existing thereon

(State Land/Riverbanks). The DKI Jakarta Provincial Government policies are:

a. Resettlement to Decent Locations

Houses and /or other structures affected by the dredging project in general are unihealty

houses with limited sanitation. The DKI Jakarta Provincial Government has allocated

better places for the relocation, namely “Rusunawa”-leased vertical houses related to the

costs and difficulty to build horizontal structures in Jakarta. Through the 2015 Orderly

Settlement Sub Task Force Action Plan, the Office of Houses and Government Building of

the Government of DKI Jakarta Province will resettle the Project Affected People by the

JUFMP/JEDI project at Krukut CIdeng and Krukut Lama Drains to Rusunawa Rawa Buaya/

Rusunawa KS Tubun. The Rusunawa are the manifestation of houses program of the Office

of Houses and Government Building of the Government of DKI Jakarta Province which will

be ready in 2016. The mechanism to in Rusunawa system will use the booking /coupon

system by meeting the requirements of Regulation of the Governor of DKI Jakarta

Province No. 111 of 2014 concerning Mechanism for Occupying Leased Rusunawa. The

system dictates that the PAPs affected by the Package 7 JEDI Project who have met the

requirements of Regulation of the Governor of DKI Jakarta Province No. 111 of 2014 will

be given coupons indicating that the PAPs are entitled to the Rusunawa but they will only

be able to stay in Rusunawa once they are ready in 2016.

According to the coordination meeting on the implementation of Package 7 LARAP, the

Head of Gambir District informed that not all structures will be affected by the project

activities as only several structures will be demolished and there will be remaining

structures that can be temporarily stayed by the PAPs. Therefore, pending the completion

of the Rusunawa from the Office of Houses and Building of the Government of DKI Jakarta

Province, the PAPs can stay temporary in the remaining building.

The requirements, registration and determination of the PAPs meeting the requirements

to stay in the Rusunawa are regulated in Governor Regulation No. 111 of 2014 chapter 3,

article 4 and article 5. Below are the requirements for the PAPs to stay in the Rusunawa:



13

d. Having ID card and Regional Family Card.

e. Having income proved by certificate of income.

f. Having TIN (Number of taxpayers).

g. Married, proved by marriage certificate or equivalent document.

h. Not having own house proved by recomandation of the head of sub district (Lurah).

i. Able to pay the rental cost of Rusunawa, electricity, water and/or other fees

determined by the Head of UPRS (Rusunawa Management Unit).

b. Compensation of Land

Utilizing state land along such as river banks, drains, canal and dam is an illegal action and

not allowed by law or regional regulation. Therefore, The DKI Jakarta Provincial

Government does not provide any compensation for their efforts to refunctions area at

the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project utilized by structures during to date.

Meanwhile, for private land owners, the mechanism will be set in accordance with laws

and regulations.

c. Compensation of Structures

Activities to build a structures for houses, business place and take advantage of State

Land, in this case the riverbanks of the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Drains constitute

annexation that is in violation of Local Regulation on Public Order and Water Resources

Law. Besides that, it will disrupt the flow pattern around the drainage and cause flooding.

Therefore, the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government will not provide cash compensation to

the structures on the riverbanks that have to be demolished by dredging and sheet pile

activities in order to refunction of the Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Drains. Meanwhile,

for structures erected on land private land title, the mechanism will be regulated

according to the applicable laws and regulations.

4.2. Legal Analysis

A legal analysis of legislations is needed to ensure the effectiveness of land acquisition and

activity of resettlement at Krukut-Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project which require the

analysis of the aspect as follows:

1. Planning, Organizing and Implementing Aspects

The legislation that is the ground of land procurement has been revised by the

introduction of Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interest

followed by Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for



14

Public Interest and Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 5 of 2012

concerning Technical Guidelines for Land Procurement. With the issuance of the three

regulations, legislations previously used as the legal grounds for land procurement for

public interest are no longer in force.

The Resettlement Policy Framework (KKPK) which serve as the Resettlement Plan

(LARAP) prepared in 2010 still uses the old legislations as the legal ground namely

Presidential Regulation No. 36 of 2005 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interest

as amended by Presidential Regulation No. 65 of 2006 and its implementing regulations.

To that end, in preparing the Resettlement Plan, it is necessary to adjust with the old

legislations.

To adopt with the new legislations, namely Law No. 2 of 2012, Presidential Regulation

No. 71 of 2012 and Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 5 of 2012,

the duties and functions of P2T are now implemented by the Land Procurement

Preparation Team formed by the Governor, along with several other activities requiring

adjustment.

2. Funding Aspects

The funding of Land Procurement for Public Interest is done by the agency requiring the

land and stated in a budgeting document according to the legislations namely

provisions of Regulation of the Minister of Finance concerning procedures for the

implementation of State Budget and implementation and accountability of operational

costs and supporting costs referring to the legislations in the field of regional finance

management.

Land Procurement for Public Interest is funded by State Budget and/or Regional Budget

as regulated in Regulation of the Minister of Finance No. 13/PMK.02/2013 and

Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 72 of 2012. The funds for Land

Procurement consist of compensation, operational costs and supporting costs for the

activities as follows:

a. Planning;

b. Preparation;

c. Implementation;

d. Delivery;

e. Administration and management and



15

f. Dissemination

The Operational and Supporting costs as mentioned above do not include compensation

and assessor’s fee. The mechanisms of land procurement and resettlement can be seen

in Table 9:



16

Table 9 IMPLEMENTATION OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT IN JUFMP/JEDI PROJECT

SUB PROJECT : KRUKUT – CIDENG AND KRUKUT LAMA PACKAGE : PIU 7 / THE OFFICE OF WATER MANAGEMENT OF DKI JAKARTA

No Description of Activity Location (Sub District/District)

Person in Charge Allocation Estimate Source Remarks

Time Cost

And implementer (Work Days) (Rp) FUND

I LAND PROCUREMENT PLANNING State Budget *) made by the agency requiring the land in this case the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) under the Office of Water management of DKI Jakarta and relevant technical agency or professional agency appointed by the PIU

1 Land Acquisition Plan

a. Feasibility Studies PIU/Associated Agency / Professional Agency

b. Preparation of Land Acquisition

Documents

2 Submission of Land Acquisition Plan Document to the Governor of DKI Jakarta

PIU of DKI Jakarta

II LAND ACQUISITION PREPARATION

1 Formation of Preparation team/Secretary of the Preparation Team

Governor of DKI Jakarta

10 Members : Mayor, SKPD, PIU, relevant agency

2 Notification to Development Plan 20

a. Dissemination Preparation team

b. Face to Face Preparation team The governor can delegate the land acquisition preparation implementation to mayors

c. Notification Preparation team

3 Official Report of Dissemination / Face to Face

Head of the Preparation Team

4 Direct Notification of Development Plan Preparation team

a. Mass Media Preparation team

b. Electronic Media Preparation team

5 Initial Data Collection of Development Plan Location

Preparation team 30

6 Public Consultation of Development Plan Preparation team 60

7 Official Report of Agreement Preparation team

8 Formation of Study Team Governor of DKI Jakarta

Formed when there are objections after public consultation

9 Formation of Study Team Secretariat Head of the Preparation Team

10 Implementation of Team Study 14

a. Inventory of Problems that are the

reason of objection

Study Team

b. Meeting / Clarification with the

Objecting Party

Study Team

c. Acceptance/rejection of objection Study Team



17

d. Delivery of acceptance/rejection of

objection

Study Team

11 Determination of Development Location The Governor of DKI Jakarta

12 Announcement of Development Location The Governor of DKI Jakarta

14

13 Land Acquisition Implementation Application

PIU

III IMPLEMENTATION OF LAND ACQUISITION REGIONAL BUDGET

1 Assignment of the local land office head as the chairperson of land acquisition

Head of Jakarta BPN Regional office

The assignment will consider the efficiency, effectiveness, geographical condition and human resources 2 Report of assignment of local land office

head Head of Jakarta

BPN Regional office

3 Determination of membership of of land acquisition implementer and regional secretariat of DKI Jakarta

Head of Jakarta BPN Regional office

4 Determination of membership of land acquisition implementer and local secretariat

Head of city land office

5 Preparation of land acquisition implementation

a. Preparation of work plan Head of Land Procurement Executive Agency

According to authority (Head of BPN regional office or Head of land office) b. Formation of land acquisition task

force

6 Inventory and Identification 30

a. Notification to entitled party Land Acquisition team/ task force

b. Measurement and mapping of fields Task force A

c. Making of field maps Task force A

d. Data collection Task force B

e. Issuance of Nominative data Task force B

7 Minutes of Inventory and identification Head of Task Force

8 Announcement of inventory and identification result

Head of Land Acq. Executive Agency

14

9 Objection from the entitled party as above 14

10 Verification and Revision of Field Map / nominative data

as above 14



18

11 Minutes of verification and revision of inventory and identification

12 Minutes of rejection of objection as above

13 Determination of Assessor as above 30

a. Simple selection

b. General selection

14 Appointment of public assessor as above

15 Minutes of delivery of inventory and identification

as above

16 Asssessment of compensation assessor 30

17 Minutes of delivery of asssessment Assessor

18 Meeting for determining compensation Head of land acq. Executive Agency

30

19 Minutes of Agreement as above

20 Delivery of monetary compensation 7

a. Opening of saving in the name of the

entitled person

as above

b. Validation of provision of monetary

compensation

as above

c. Proof of delivery of monetary

compensation

Entitled party

d. Minutes of delivery of compensation PIU/entitled party

e. Minutes of release of rights Head of land office

f. Photo / video documentation Land Acquisition team

21 Provision of compensation in the form of substitute land

a. Provision of substitute land PIU/entitled party 180

b. Validation of payment of

compensation in the form of

substitute land

Land Acquisition team

c. Receipt of delivery of compensation in

the form of substitute land

Entitled party

d. Minutes of delivery of compensation

in the form of substitute land

PIU/entitled party


f. Photo / video documentation Land Acqusition team



19

22 Provision of compensation in the form of resettlement

a. Provision of resettlement PIU 365

b. Validation of payment of

compensation in the form of

resettlement

Head of Land Acqquisition team

c. Receipt of delivery of compensation in

the form of resettlement

Entitled party

d. Minutes of delivery of compensation

in the form of resettlement

PIU/entitled party


f. Photo / video documentation Land Acquisition team

23 Provision of compensation in other form

a. Validation of payment of

compensation in other form

Head of Land Acqusition team

b. Receipt of delivery of compensation in

other form

Entitled party

c. Minutes of delivery PIU/entitled party

d. Photo / video documentation Land Acquisition team

24 Provision of compensation in the form of shares


compensation in the form of shares

Head ofLand Acquisition Team


the form of shares

Entitled party

c. Minutes of delivery of compensation

in the form of shares

PIU*/entitled party *In this case state/regional owned enterprise

d. Minutes of release of rights Head of land office

e. Photo / video documentation Land Acquisition Team

25 Provision of compensation in special conditions


compensation in special conditions

Head of Land Acquisition team



20


special conditions

Entitled party

c. Minutes of delivery of compensation

in special conditions

PIU/entitled party

d. Minutes of release of rights Head of land office

e. Photo / video documentation Land Acquisition team

26 Deposit of compensation

a. Application of deposit of

compensation in court

PIU

b. Minutes of compensation Chief of District Court

27 Documentation of Field Map, Nominative Map and Land Acquisition Administration Data

Head of land office

28 Delivery of Result of land acquisition for public interest

a. Minutes of delivery of result of land

measurement

Head of Land Acquisition team

7

b. Application for land certificate PIU

c. Issuance of measurement certificate Head of land office

d. Issuance of land certificate Head of land office

Remarks: Legal Basis: 1. Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest

2. Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012 concerning Organization of Land Acquisition for Public Interest

3. Presidential Regulation No. 40 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012

4. Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 5 of 2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for the Implementation of Land Acquisition

5. Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 72 of 2012 concerning Operational Costs and Supporting Costs for the Organization of Land Acquisition for Development

for Public Interests derived from Regional Budget



21

3. Environmental and Public Order Aspects

Law No. 7 of 2004 mandates that in encountering imbalance between the water supply that

tends to decrease and the increasing water requirements, water resources must be managed

by taking into account social, environmental and economic functions in a balanced manner.

As illegal settlements along river banks have in facts disturbed the environment, polluted

water and disturbed water flow, they may lead to potential floods. Therefore, illegal

settlements along river banks are violation of laws.

In order to actualize an orderly, peaceful, convenient, good and beautiful life in Jakarta, has

been issued Regional Regulation of DKI Jakarta No. 8 of 2007 concerning Public Order. One of

the provisions is concerning order in rivers, channels, pools and offshore areas. Therefore, any

activity along the river bank such as for building sanitary facilities, settlements or places of

business is not allowed, unless under the permission of the governor.

4.3. Institutions

In the implementation of the handling of Project Affected People along the Krukut Cideng and

Krukut Lama Drains and other locations in Packages 4, 6 and 7 of the JUFMP/JEDI Project. The

Governor of DKI Jakarta Province has issued Instruction Number 48 of 2014 concerning

Implementation of Resettlement of Project Affected People by the JUFMP/JEDI Project given

assignment to institutions of Jakarta Provincial Government to support and facilitate the

Resettlement of Project Affected People by the JUFMP/JEDI Project. The duties and

responsibilities of each agency are as detailed in the table below:

Table 10: Implementing Agencies of Resettlement of Project Affected People at the Krukut Cideng

and Krukut Lama Drains

NO. AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD

FUND

1. Secretary of DKI

Jakarta

Government

to coordinate all activities of

Jakarta Provincial Government's

support for the implementation

of resettlement activities

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

2. Development and

Environment

Assistant

To assist the Secretary of

Province DKI Jakarta in

coordinating all activities of

Jakarta Provincial government

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2017



22


FUND

3. Administration

Assistant

To help the regional secretary

coordinate mayors in performing

the resettlement process

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2012-2017

4. Head of

Development

Planning Agency of

DKI Jakarta

Province

To coordinate the planning and

budget allocation of regional

apparatuses related to the

implementation of JUFMP / JEDI,

including the resettlement of

Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama

project affected people

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2012-2017

5. Central Jakarta

Mayor

To coordinate government

appratuses in Gambir District and

Petojo Utara Sub District in

carrying out the process of

resettlement of The Krukut Lama

dredging project affected people

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2012-2016

6. West Jakarta

Mayor

To coordinate govermment

appratuses

- in Tambora District and

Tanah Sareal Sub District and

Tambora Sub District in


resettlement of The Krukut

Lama dredging PAPs

- in Tamansari District and

Krukut Sub District in


resettlement of The Krukut

Lama dredging PAPs

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2012-2017

7. Head of Office of

Public Works

(Now-Head of

Water

Management

Office)

To announce and prepare

data of the Krukut Cideng and

Krukut Lama PAPs who have

been verified by District Head

and Sub District Head (data

attached)

To implement assistance in

the process of resettlement

of PAPs, either through

relocation to Rusunawa

which have been provided as

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2012-2017



23


FUND

well as other compensation

options

8. Head of the Office

of Housing and

Government

Building

To provide Rusunawa and

allocate units of Rusunawa

for PAPs to provide

assistance to the relocated

people

During the process

of preparation and

implementation of

resettlement

provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2017

9. Head Office of

Communications,

Information and

Public Relations

To provide documentation, press

releases, and publications in the

media of the Jakarta Provincial

Government

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provncial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

10. Head of Office of

Population and

Civil Registration

To provide services for displaced

people from the origin to

Rusunawa or other location

designated resettlement location

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

11. Head Office of

Health, Office of

Education, Office

of Transportation

To provide health, education and

transport services

During resettlement process : preparation and implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

12. Head Office of

Social Affairs,

Office of SMES,

Office of Labor

To provide business recovery

assistance

During resettlement process : preparation and implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

13. Head Office of Civil

Service Police

To help PAPs make emptying,

demolition of structurs and

guard land that has been

acquired

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

14. Head of City

Infrastructure

Bureau

To implement monitoring and

coordinating the implementation

of JUFMP / JEDI project, including

the resettlement process

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

15. Head of Gambir

District

To verify the data of PAPs Krukut

Lama project

To coordinate the apparatuses of

Petojo Utara Sub District in the

disseminationand resettlement

process

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

Head of Tambora

District


Cideng project


Petojo Utara Sub District in the

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016



24


FUND


process

Head of Taman

Sari District


Cideng project


Krukut Sub District in the


process

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

16. Head of Petojo

Utara Sub District

To verify the data of PAPs; To

implement the process of

resettlement

During resettlement

process:

preparation,

implementation and

monitoring

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

Head of Tanah

Sareal Sub District



resettlement

Head of Tambora

Sub District



resettlement

Head of Krukut

Sub District

To verify the data of PAPs

To implement the process of

resettlement

17. Management Unit

of Rusunawa

To collect data of Rusunawa

(vertical house own by DKI

Jakarta) capacity in their area to

be occupied by the PAPs

To perform resettlement

During resettlement

process :

preparation and

implementation

Provincial Budget

of DKI Jakarta

2015-2016

4.4. Monitoring and Evaluation

The Directorate General of Water Resources of the Ministry of Public Works and Public

Settlement represented by CPIU assisted by the supervising consultant will act as the internal

supervisor of the project. At CPIU level, Monthly Report will be submitted to the Director of

Water Resources of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Settlement while at Jakarta PIU

level, it will be submitted to the Governor of DKI Jakarta Province through the office of Water

Management and Provincial Secretary. Monitoring will be started during preparation of

LARAP, and the Monitoring Progress Report will be available for the Project Affected People

and uploaded in the websites of JUFMP/JEDI and WB.



25

4.5. Complain Handling

Complaints related to aspects of resettlement people affected by the project will be addressed

as soon as possible and settled in posts that serve as places for complainer to lodge complaints

(within 14 (fourteen) days) The process of handling complaints will be facilitated by experts

from the Complaints Handling Supervision Consultant assigned in the field. Complaints can be

submitted by SMS, Email / Web, or lodged personally to the post.

POST –On site complaint handling (Sub-project) : The Project affected people that lodge

complaints in person / indirectly, written / or verbally shall subsequently record, verify, store

and deliver them to the competent institution and or PIU of Office of Water Management of

DKI Jakarta Province.

CITY LEVEL : if complainer are disappointed, not satisfied or not received response from the

PIU, complainer can submit complaints to the Mayor Office. After receiving complaints of the

complainer, the Mayor will take action on the case in question. To help resolve the complaint,

the Mayor is responsible to document and keep records of the complaints handled.

PROVINCIAL LEVEL : if the complaint does not receive a response from the mayor, complainer

can submit a complaint to the Governor. The time required for the handling of complaints is

about 30 (thirty) days.

Final steps: If complainer are disappointed and not receiving response from the governor, the

complaint can be taken to court for legal completion.



26

4.6. Resettlement Implementation Work Plan

The Work Plan of Handling PAPs Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Project.

Table 11: The Work Plan of Handling PAPs in Krukut Cideng and Krukut Lama Sub Project

No Program and Activity Implementation period

Person in Charge Fiscal year

I. Preparation

1. Establish the team of Land Acquisition Implementation (based Instruction Governor of DKI Jakarta Province No. 48 of 2014) May 30, 2014

30 May 2014 DKI Jakarta Development Planning Agency

2014

2. Preparation LARAP Document Agustus 2014 Office of Public Works (Now-Water Management Office)

2013 - 2014

3. Cut off date 21 March 2014 As above 2014

4. Determination of Project Affected People 21 March 2014 as above 2014

II. LAND ACQUISITION*)

None

III. RESETTLEMENTS

5 Preparation of New Location for constructing / preparing Rusunawa

August 2015 – December 2016

Office of Housing and Government Buildings

2014 - 2016

6 Deliberation with PAPs to determine the new locations, procedures to get building, rights and obligations, schedule of moving

August – September 2015

Mayors of Central and West Jakarta, heads of districts and sub districts at the PAPs location

2015/2016

7 Delivery of coupon for Rusunawa standby user

August – September 2015

Heads of sub districts and districts, PIU and Office of Housing

2015/2016

8 Transportation assistance to relocate properties from old location to leased vertical house/new location

December 2016 Office of transportation 2016 - 2017

9 Relocation of PAPs December 2016 Office of Housing and Government Building, Office of Population and Civil Registry, Head of Civil Service Police

2016 - 2017

10 Demolition of Structures affected by the project

December 2016 structure owners assisted by district and sub district government

2015 - 2017

1) The contractor is responsible for damage/ destruction of structures due to project activities

August 2015 – December 2016

Office of Water Management

2) The Field activities work plan will be prepared by the contractor by adjusting to the readiness of relocation of PAPs to the Rusunawa or temporary shelter before moving to the Rusunawa

August 2015 – September 2015


3) Demolition of structures resulting in relocation of PAPs will be done after they have moved to the




27

No Program and Activity Implementation period

Person in Charge Fiscal year

Rusunawa or temporary shelter before moving to the Rusunawa

11 Assistance for students. Students will be given Smart Jakarta Card as part of free schooling up to high school

June 2016 – June 2017

Office of Education 2014 – 2015

12 Health Facilities through Health Jakarta Card October 2014 – May 2015

Office of Education 2014 – 2015

IV DREDGING AND SHEET PILE INSTALLATION

13 Dredging August 2015 – December 2016

14 Installation of sheet pile August 2015 – December 2016

*) Land Procurement will be adjusted to: 1. Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest.

2. Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012 concerning Organization of Land Acquisition for Public Interest.

3. Presidential Regulation No. 40 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012.

4. Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 5 of 2012 concerning Technical Guidelines for the

Implementation of Land Acquisition.

5. Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 72 of 2012 concerning Operational Costs and Supporting Costs for

the Organization of Land Acquisition for Development for Public Interests derived from Regional Budget.



28

Attachment 1: Photos of Project Area Condition

Structures Surrounding Krukut Lama Drain Sellers Surrounding Krukut Drain at Jl. Hanura

Tanah Sareal Sub District

Squatters Hanging on the Krukut Drains

Surrounding Petojo Utara Sub District

Survei Activities Surrounding Krukut-Cideng

and Krukut Lama Drains



29

Attachment 2A: Physical Activities Plan



30



31

Attachment 2B : Cross Section Surounding Project Affected People Site



32



33

Attachment 3 : List of Project Affected People



34

Attachment 4 : Sketch of Project Affected People Site



35



36



37

Attachment 5: Summary of Structures and PAPs Pakin-Kali Besar-Jelakeng Sub Project

No. Kategori WTP Jumlah Bangunan/WTP Area/luas (m2) Hak-Hak Pilihan atas hak Perkiraan Biaya

(Rp.)

Bangunan terkena seluruhnya

Bangunan terkena sebagian

Bangunan terkena seluruhn

ya

Bangunan terkena Sebagian

Jumlah bangunan/ Jumlah WTP

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

1. Warga yang menempati

55/52 42/42 2550 840 Kompensasi atas hilangnya bangunan

Jumlah bangunan/

penyewa

Jumlah bangunan

yang terkena sebagian

Jumlah yang

harus pindah

Jumlah yang tidak

perlu pindah

Pilihan bantuan pemukiman

kembali

Perkiraan biaya (Rp.)

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

2. Penyewa 35/38 20/14 48 4 Bantuan Pindah

Jumlah WTP

# Tipe Mata Pencaharian WTP Pilihan bantuan rehabilitasi

Perkiraan Biaya (Rp.)

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

3. Orang yang terpengaruh mata

pencaharian nya

50 12 10 2 8 8 Bantuan rehabilitasi

Jumlah WTP

Bangunan dibongkar seluruhnya

Dibongkar sebagian Pilihan WTP Perkiraan Biaya (Rp.)

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3

4. Pemilik Aset yang rusak selama konstruksi

Biaya pengganti yang disiapkan kontraktor

Fungsi dan ukuran bangunan

Fungsi dan ukuran sisa bangunan

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

5. Penyerobot Tidak mendapat kompensasi

Jumlah WTP

Jumlah bangunan sewa

Jumlah Penyewa terkena proyek

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

6. Pemilik bangunan sewa informal

Tanpa kompensasi bangunan diatas 3 unit

*) Catatan :

Orangyang memiliki dan menempati tempat tinggal dan bangunan lainnya: 1 =kompensasi uang tunaidan akses keperumahan rakyat

2 =perumahan rakyat

3 =hanya kompensasi uang tunai

4 =bentuk lain darikompensasi, pemindahan ke rusunawa yang sesuai

dengan ketentuan Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Penyewa: 1=perumahan rakyat 2=biaya sewadan akses keperumahan rakyat

3=skemalain 4=dll

Orangyang mata pencahariannyaakan terpengaruh: 1=hilangnyapendapatan daritoko kecil 2=kehilangan pendapatandari industrikecil 3=hilangnyapenghasilan dari kegiatanproduktifspesifik(seperti nelayan)

4=hilangnyapendapatan darijasa 5=lainnya

Pilihan untukbantuan rehabilitasi: 1=fasilitasiuntuk menemukantempat baruterdekat dengan wilayahsemula 2=pelatihanuntuk berbagai jenispekerjaan

3=kredit 4=fasilitasidalam pembentukankegiatanyang menghasilkan pendapatanbaru 5=kombinasi di atas



38

Pemilikasetyang rusak selamakonstruksi: Semua bangunanyang rusak 1=tempat tinggal 2=tempat usaha

3=pagar 4=lain Sebagian rusak 1=tempat tinggal 2=tempat usaha 3=pagar 4=lain

Pilihan untukkompensasi 1=kompensasitunai 2=membangun kembali 3=sewa

Penyerobot: Jenispenggunaandan ukuranbangunandiserobot 1=tempat usaha 2=dapur

3=toilet 4=lainnya

Penggunaandanukuran bangunanyang tersisa

1=tempat tinggal utama, ukuran rata-rata 2=tempat tinggal utamadan usaha, ukuran rata-rata 3 = tempat usaha saja, ukuran rata-rata 4 =lainnya, rata-rata ukuran

Pemilik bangunan sewa informal:

Jumlahbangunansewa 1=satu unit 2=dua unit 3=tiga unit 4=lebih dari tigaunit Jumlahpenyewayang terkena dampak

1=dalam satu unit 2=didua unit 3=ditiga unit 4=empatunit



39

Attachment 6 : Governor of DKI Jakarta Instruction No. 48/ 2014 on Implementation of Resettlement Project Affected People of JUFMP



40



41



42



43

Attachment 7 : DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 111/2014 on Mechanism of Occupaying Rusunawa (Low Income Housing)



44



45



46



47



48



49



50



51



52



53

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SPECIAL CAPITAL CITY OF JAKARTA...

Documents

Transcript of THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SPECIAL CAPITAL CITY OF JAKARTA...