The EU SAFA Programme - European Regions Airline … Forum 2012 EASA... · The EU SAFA Programme...
Transcript of The EU SAFA Programme - European Regions Airline … Forum 2012 EASA... · The EU SAFA Programme...
The EU SAFA Programme
Federico GRANDINI SAFA Coordination Officer 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum Cologne, 25 October 2012
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 2
The EU SAFA Programme
SAFA Directive 2004/36/CE (applicable 30/04/2006)
Introducing legal obligations upon EU MS:
SAFA transferred to Commission and EASA as of 01/01/2007 => Commission Regulation (EC) No 768/2006
to inspect third-country aircraft landing at their airports
•A/C involved in commercial operation
•A/C > 5700 KG involved in non-commercial OPS
•Helicopter operation
to participate to the collection and exchange of information
on the ramp inspections
results
the possibility to inspect aircraft
• involved in non-commercial <5700KG
• from other EU MS
3
Principles SAFA Programme
Linked to ICAO (compliance with ICAO Standards / complementary to ICAO USOAP)
Bottom-up approach
A single set of procedures for the performance of the ramp inspections
A single tool (centralised SAFA Database)
A single syllabus for training and qualification of inspectors
Standardisation – ensuring long term data quality improvements
Prioritisation: a tool to make SAFA more effective
4
EASA
(27+3+1)
EU
(27)
Switzerland Iceland Norway
FYROM
Turkey
Georgia
Croatia
Monaco
Ukraine
Armenia
Moldova
Azerbaijan
Montenegro(*)
Albania
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Serbia
Morocco(*)
Cyprus
Finland
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Belgium
Denmark
Germany
Ireland
Malta
Slovak Rep.
Sweden
Romania
Austria
Czech Rep.
France
Hungary
Luxembourg
Poland
Portugal
Spain
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Bulgaria
Member/Participating/Candidate States
(Lichtenstein)
SAFA Participating (42)
and Candidate (2*)
States
2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne
General Indicators
11,262 Inspections (<3.77%)
Performed by 41 (of 42) Participating states
… on 321 aerodromes
… on 6,264 different aircraft registrations
… of 204 types and variants
… operated by more than 1,050 operators
… from 137 States and territories
... Identified 11,019 findings (>5.97%)
Annual Aggregated Report 2011
Aggregated Report - 2011
Inspections on
EU Operators
Inspections on
non-EU Operators
2011 5 593 (49.7%) 5 669 (50.3%)
Operators 534 570
Config. Inspections Findings Percentage F/I
Combi 16 19 0.14% 1.19
Cargo 883 1099 7.84% 1.24
Pax 10 363 10 552 92.02% 1.02
9
Ongoing developments – new IRs
Implementing Rules to EASA’s Basic Regulation – Ramp Inspections
The scope established by the IR is wider than under the SAFA Directive: all aircraft subject to EASA’s Basic Regulation used by TCO as well as EU operators (both commercial and
non-commercial) are included
New Rulemaking task: the existing EASA SAFA Guidance Material on qualification of ramp inspectors and on ramp inspections shall be:
• transferred to new AMCs and GMs (Q2 2013), and
• complemented as regards the performance of ramp inspections on EU operators (SACA, Q2 2013) and the approval of SAFA training organisations (Q2 2014)
10
Ongoing developments – new IRs
Part ARO-Subpart RAMP – new elements:
RI Programme based on calculation methodology
and on safety risk
Mandatory inspections on EU operators (SACA)
Use of EU standards for EU operators (SACA)
Quantitative prioritisation: minimum annual proportion
for each Member State
A minimum number of points per State is fixed
extra points are granted for:
• Priority inspections
• Remote airports
• Odd hours
• Rarely inspected operators
11
Ongoing developments – new IRs
Implementing Rules to EASA’s Basic Regulation – Ramp Inspections
As a result, it is necessary to transpose its
provisions in the context of the new
Implementing Rules
The SAFA legislative
framework will change => GM will lose its legal basis
The SAFA Directive will be repealed as
soon as the Implementing
Rules to EASA’s Basic Regulation will enter into
force (28/10/2012)
“OPS-087” timeline
12
Publication NPA: Q4
2012
Publication Opinion (IRs for approval SAFA TO): Q4 2013
Publication AMC/GM: Q4
2013
Publication AMC/GM
(Approval of SAFA TO): Q4 2014
14
Guidance Material
Developed in application of the provisions of the SAFA Directive as amended by Commission Directive 2008/49/EC
Qualification of Inspectors 29/09/2008
SAFA Ramp Inspections V1:22/07/2009
V2:27/07/2012
Future AMC/GM in the framework of the new Irs: Q4 2013
GM is public and available on EASA website for maximum transparency
15
SAFA Ramp Inspections GM – V2
Adopted 27 July 2012
Review necessary following:
• Latest amendments to ICAO SARPs
• Comments received from participating countries
• Feedback from EASA standardisation audits
• Experience gained on the field after several years of successful implementation of the EU SAFA Programme in the Participating States
Review of the Pre-Described Findings (PDFs) has led to:
• New PDFs
• Reworked PDFs
• Deleted PDFs
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 16
SAFA Ramp Inspections GM – V2
4. SAFA Findings – 4.1 General:
……
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 17
SAFA Ramp Inspections GM – V2
4.2 Detection/reporting/assessment of significant technical defects:
……
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 19
SAFA Ramp Inspections GM – V2
6.2 Further follow-up – 6.2.1 Class 2 actions:
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 20
Other important topics
Assessment of findings on certificates and licences prior to categorisation
Guidance is provided in Inspecting Instructions of all relevant items:
A08 Certificate of Registration
A10 AOC (or equivalent)
A11 Radio Licence
A12 Certificate of Airworthiness
A20 Flight Crew Licence
Obvious defects
Significant technical defects
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 21
A01 – Inspecting instructions
More guidance on door area monitoring:
22
Centralised SAFA database
Web based application
•New version since September 2011
•Access granted to Guest NAAs and to operators
Access for SAFA Participating
States:
• inclusion of reports
• retrieve data
• respond to uploaded follow-up information
NEW – Access for operators as well as
non-SAFA NAAs:
• retrieve data, limited to their own reports
•add follow-up information on actions taken
23
Database statistics
Total number of approved users: 1980
Member State NAA users: 513 (58 coordinators)
Associated State NAA users: 91 (21 coordinators)
Candidate State NAA users: 3 (2 coordinators)
Guest State NAA users: 311 (36 coordinators) from 25 countries – Algeria, Argentina, Belarus, Brazil, Canada,
Cape Verde, Chile, China, Curaçao, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Hong Kong, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Thailand, Tunisia, UAE, USA
EASA/ICAO/Commission users: 70
Operator users: 992 from 676 operators
Reports on registered OPR: 80%
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 24
SAFA Standardisation Programme Overview
To assist the European Commission in monitoring the implementation and
effective application of the SAFA-related EU legislation (regulations / directives /
guidance materials) and its uniform understanding
To assess the impact of the implementation of the
SAFA-related EU legislation and its effectiveness
To ensure long term data quality improvements
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne 25
SAFA Standardisation Programme Legal Basis
Paragraph 2.4.5 of Annex to the Commission Directive 2008/49/EC
•SAFA standardisation audits conducted by EASA in accordance with the working methods provided under Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2006
•736/2006 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 90/2012, with explicit reference to assessing compliance with requirements of EASA Basic Regulation and its implementing rules in the field of ramp inspections
Terms of Reference for the SAFA standardisation process as agreed and
endorsed by the European SAFA Steering Group on its 8th Meeting in Dubrovnik
(Croatia), 21-22 October 2009.
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne
Progress Report – 1st Standardisation cycle
Audits performed:
2009 Luxembourg Lithuania Sweden Portugal Switzerland
2010 Ukraine Poland Czech Republic
Albania Slovak Republic
Denmark
Bulgaria Spain Turkey Belgium Bosnia & Herzegovina
Greece
Norway Austria United Kingdom
Slovenia Ireland Romania
Cyprus Serbia Hungary Estonia Finland FYROM
2011
Croatia
Moldova
Iceland
Latvia Germany
France
Azerbaijan Georgia Armenia Netherlands Malta Italy
Progress Report – 2nd Standardisation cycle
Audits planned in 2012 (SSIAP): 16
Audits performed in 2012 (October) 14*
SAFA only: 16 (100 %)
Combined visits: 0 (0 %)
Audits planned in 2013 (SSIAP): 15
* One in progress
25/10/2012 2nd SAFA Regulators and Industry Forum, Cologne
Harmonisation and Simplification
Annex 6 Part I, 4.2.2.2 “Surveillance of foreign operators (National schemes already in place)
TCOs must adhere to ICAO standards
Harmonisation of existing different approval systems (one set of rules) in the EU
Simplification
•one Authority (EASA), one assessment methodology (Part-TCO) and one Authorisation
•In the majority of cases desktop reviews only
•on-site visits only for banned operators or operators subject to an enforcement measure, i.e. suspension
Alignment with the EU Safety List
29
Legal Framework
ICAO Annex 6 Part I
“4.2.2.1: “Contracting States shall recognize as valid an air operator certificate issued by another Contracting State, provided that the requirements under which the certificate was issued are at least equal to the applicable Standards specified in this Annex”.
“4.2.2.2 States shall establish a programme with procedures for the surveillance of operations in their territory by a foreign operator and for taking appropriate action when necessary to preserve safety.”
30
• e.g. USA, Canada, Australia, China, United Arab Emirates
Programmes outside the
EU
• The vast majority of EASA States assesses TCOs against ICAO standards
• 75% of EASA States perform a basic assessment
• 25% of EASA States subject TCOs to greater scrutiny
Programmes in the EU
31
TCO Assessment levels (proposed)
•Population: 850+ TCOs from 100+ States
•Expected distribution of assessment levels
•Vast majority to be processed in a simple, straight-forward document
review
•A minority to be assessed by means of further investigations
(consultations as deemed necessary, video-/teleconferencing)
•Only banned TCOs or TCOs subject to an enforcement measure (i.e.
suspension) will be audited
32
Overview
•TCO Application
•Bilateral agreement
•EU Safety list
•Yes/no
•EASA authorisation yes/no
•TCO: Assessment model high level of confidence into State and Operator
33
•No or light
•assessment
•“Fast track” (Desktop review)
•TCO: Assessment model low level of confidence
into State and/or
•Operator
•Further assessment
•This may include an
•audit
•for banned operators