The Effect of Integrating Ultrasound Imaging into Osteopathic...

1
Kristen de Vries, OMS-IV 1 , Rebecca Brown OMS-III 1 , Joseph Mazzie DO 2,3 , Min-Kyung Jung PhD 4 , George Cheriyan DO 5 , Sheldon Yao DO 5 , and Michael Terzella DO 5 1 New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine (NYITCOM), Old Westbury, NY; 2 Department of Radiology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY; 3 Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY; 4 Office of Research, NYITCOM, Old Westbury, NY; 5 Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, NYITCOM, Old Westbury, NY The Effect of Integrating Ultrasound Imaging into Osteopathic Medical Student Palpation Training RESULTS CONCLUSION Landmarks Group Mean distance from landmark (mm) p-value Long head of biceps tendon 1 (n=27) 62.9 0.024* 2 (n=31) 41.4 Supraspinatus tendon 1 (n=28) 43.6 0.50 2 (n=33) 37.4 Coracoid process 1 (n=30) 12.7 0.82 2 (n=33) 11.6 T1 transverse process 1 (n=28) 8.5 0.29 2 (n=32) 6.3 OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of ultrasound as an educational supplement will improve osteopathic medical students’ ability to identify and palpate specific anatomic landmarks of the shoulder. Total number of subjects: 64 • The mean distance palpated from the long head of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was 62.9 mm in Group 1 and 41.4 mm in Group 2. This was statistically significant. • The mean distance palpated from the supraspinatus tendon was 43.6 mm in Group 1 and 37.4 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant. • The mean distance palpated from the coracoid process was 12.7 mm in Group 1 and 11.6 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant. • The mean distance palpated from T1 transverse process was 8.5 mm in Group 1 and 6.3 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant. Table 1: Mean distance palpated from each landmark. *Statistically significant result p<0.05 Figure 4: Mean distance palpated from each landmark. The results of this study indicate that the average distance from the landmark, as palpated by the subjects, was higher in the group without exposure to ultrasound than the group with exposure to ultrasound. Therefore, there may be a role for the integration of ultrasound into pre-clinical curricula. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effects of integrating ultrasound into palpatory training for first year osteopathic medical students. Strengths The subjects were first year osteopathic medical students who had no previous experience with musculoskeletal ultrasound and little exposure to palpation. Limitations This is a small sample size. Also, this was not a part of the standard curriculum, so there may have been some difference in the level of engagement of the participating subjects. Additionally, we did not test baseline knowledge of anatomical landmarks with a practical examination. Future Research Subsequent studies could explore the use of ultrasound in other anatomical areas and the effects of more intensive ultrasound training. The improvement in palpatory accuracy demonstrated here is a promising start to integrating the use of ultrasound into pre-clinical medical education. Future research in training students to use ultrasound imaging in conjunction with palpation may help to improve current standards on how to teach anatomic landmarks and develop palpatory skills. The physical examination is a fundamental skill for all physicians, yet recent research has shown a steady decline in physical examination proficiency amongst clinicians. 1 One component of the structural exam is the assessment of the shoulder. Although shoulder pain is a common complaint, studies show that physicians’ accuracy in locating anatomical landmarks of the shoulder is dismal. 2 There is a clear need for improved anatomical identification skills and this should start at the pre-clinical level. The growing use of ultrasound in clinical practice shows a necessity for its integration into medical education, but may be particularly useful in the osteopathic manipulative medicine curriculum as it may allow students to better identify and palpate anatomical and musculoskeletal landmarks. 5 BACKGROUND • Randomized-controlled trial, IRB approval obtained 12/9/2014 by NYITCOM (IRB #BHS-1079). • Subjects who had any prior experience utilizing and interpreting ultrasound diagnostic imaging and who were previously trained as foreign physicians or healthcare professionals were excluded from this study. Both groups were given a tutorial on anatomic landmarks and palpation of the shoulder, specifically the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove, supraspinatus tendon, coracoid process, and T1 transverse process. Both groups had designated time for palpation practice. See Figure 2. • Group 1 (Control group): Palpation practice alone, no ultrasound. • Group 2 (Experimental group): Ultrasound tutorial, palpation practice. • Subjects in both groups were administered a post-session practical examination in which they were asked to locate the 4 landmarks specified above. • Findings were confirmed by an ultrasound-trained radiologist. • SPSS was used to run an independent samples t-test to compare the mean distance palpated from each landmark between the two groups. METHODS Group 1: Palpation practice Group 2: Ultrasound tutorial Palpation practice Video Session: Anatomy and palpation of the shoulder Practical examination Figure 2 (Above): Protocol flow chart REFERENCES 1. Butter J, Grant TH, Egan M, Kaye M, Wayne DB, Carrión-Carire V, McGaghie WC. “Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination?”. Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9): 843-8. 2. Gregory P. Gazzillo, MD, Jonathan T. Finnoff, DO, Mederic M. Hall, MD, Yusef A. Sayeed, MD, MPH, M. Eng, Jay Smith, MD. “Accuracy of Palpating the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: An Ultrasonographic Study”. PM&R. 2011 Nov(3): 1035-1040. 3. 3D4Medical. Essential Anatomy (Version 5.0.3) [Mobile Application Software]. 4. Mircea PA, Badea R, Fodor D, Buzoianu AD. “Using ultrasonography as a teaching support tool in undergraduate medical education - time to reach a decision”. Med Ultrason. 2012 Sep;14(3):211-6. 5. Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Guirao-Piñeyro M, Castro-Martín E, Díaz-Rodríguez L. “A blended learning approach to palpation and ultrasound imaging skills through supplementation of traditional classroom teaching with an e-learning package”. Man Ther. 2012 Oct;17(5):474-8. This study was supported by a grant from the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine and the Osteopathic Heritage Foundation. We would like to thank all of the subjects, faculty, staff, and medical student volunteers for their contributions to this study. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Supraspinatus tendon Biceps tendon within the bicipital groove Coracoid process Ultrasound imaging is a form of growing technology in clinical use, and has shown promising results when introduced into pre-clinical medical education. This randomized-controlled study was performed to determine whether the integration of ultrasound imaging will improve osteopathic medical students’ ability to locate specific shoulder anatomical landmarks. 64 subjects were recruited, signed informed consent and were randomized to one of two groups: with exposure or without exposure to an ultrasound device. Both groups were taught the structural and surface anatomy of the shoulder, and given time to practice their skills palpating the specified landmarks. Those in the ultrasound group were given instruction on sonography and how to use it to find landmarks. Following the didactic sessions, subjects in both groups were administered a post- session practical examination in which they were asked to locate each landmark. Upon analysis using independent samples t-test, subjects in the ultrasound group more accurately palpated the landmarks with a significant difference in palpation of the biceps tendon (p=0.024). These results indicate that there may be a role for the integration of ultrasound into pre-clinical curricula to improve the accuracy of palpation in osteopathic medical students. ABSTRACT Figure 1: Anatomic landmarks of the shoulder palpated by subjects in this study. 3 Figure 3: Subjects engaging in ultrasound and palpation practice 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Long head of biceps Supraspinatus tendon Coracoid process T1 transverse process Group 1 Group 2

Transcript of The Effect of Integrating Ultrasound Imaging into Osteopathic...

Page 1: The Effect of Integrating Ultrasound Imaging into Osteopathic …files.academyofosteopathy.org/.../deVries_IntegratingUl… ·  · 2017-06-271 New York Institute of Technology College

1

Kristen de Vries, OMS-IV1, Rebecca Brown OMS-III1, Joseph Mazzie DO2,3, Min-Kyung Jung PhD4, George Cheriyan DO5, Sheldon Yao DO5, and Michael Terzella DO5

1 New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine (NYITCOM), Old Westbury, NY; 2 Department of Radiology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY; 3 Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY; 4 Office of Research, NYITCOM, Old Westbury, NY; 5 Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, NYITCOM, Old Westbury, NY

The Effect of Integrating Ultrasound Imaging into Osteopathic Medical Student Palpation Training

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

Landmarks Group Mean distance from landmark (mm) p-value

Long head of biceps tendon

1 (n=27) 62.9 0.024*

2 (n=31) 41.4

Supraspinatus tendon 1 (n=28) 43.6

0.50 2 (n=33) 37.4

Coracoid process 1 (n=30) 12.7

0.82 2 (n=33) 11.6

T1 transverse process 1 (n=28) 8.5

0.29 2 (n=32) 6.3

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of ultrasound as an educational supplement will improve osteopathic medical students’ ability to identify and palpate specific anatomic landmarks of the shoulder.

•  Total number of subjects: 64

•  The mean distance palpated from the long head of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was 62.9 mm in Group 1 and 41.4 mm in Group 2. This was statistically significant.

•  The mean distance palpated from the supraspinatus tendon was 43.6 mm in Group 1 and 37.4 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant.

•  The mean distance palpated from the coracoid process was 12.7 mm in Group 1 and 11.6 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant.

•  The mean distance palpated from T1 transverse process was 8.5 mm in Group 1 and 6.3 mm in Group 2. This was not statistically significant.

Table 1: Mean distance palpated from each landmark. *Statistically significant result p<0.05 Figure 4: Mean distance palpated from each landmark.

The results of this study indicate that the average distance from the landmark, as palpated by the subjects, was higher in the group without exposure to ultrasound than the group with exposure to ultrasound. Therefore, there may be a role for the integration of ultrasound into pre-clinical curricula. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effects of integrating ultrasound into palpatory training for first year osteopathic medical students.

Strengths The subjects were first year osteopathic medical students who had no previous experience with musculoskeletal ultrasound and little exposure to palpation.

Limitations This is a small sample size. Also, this was not a part of the standard curriculum, so there may have been some difference in the level of engagement of the participating subjects. Additionally, we did not test baseline knowledge of anatomical landmarks with a practical examination.

Future Research Subsequent studies could explore the use of ultrasound in other anatomical areas and the effects of more intensive ultrasound training. The improvement in palpatory accuracy demonstrated here is a promising start to integrating the use of ultrasound into pre-clinical medical education. Future research in training students to use ultrasound imaging in conjunction with palpation may help to improve current standards on how to teach anatomic landmarks and develop palpatory skills.

The physical examination is a fundamental skill for all physicians, yet recent research has shown a steady decline in physical examination proficiency amongst clinicians.1

One component of the structural exam is the assessment of the shoulder. Although shoulder pain is a common complaint, studies show that physicians’ accuracy in locating anatomical landmarks of the shoulder is dismal.2

There is a clear need for improved anatomical identification skills and this should start at the pre-clinical level.

The growing use of ultrasound in clinical practice shows a necessity for its integration into medical education, but may be particularly useful in the osteopathic manipulative medicine curriculum as it may allow students to better identify and palpate anatomical and musculoskeletal landmarks.5

BACKGROUND

•  Randomized-controlled trial, IRB approval obtained 12/9/2014 by NYITCOM (IRB #BHS-1079).

•  Subjects who had any prior experience utilizing and interpreting ultrasound diagnostic imaging and who were previously trained as foreign physicians or healthcare professionals were excluded from this study.

•  Both groups were given a tutorial on anatomic landmarks and palpation of the shoulder, specifically the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove, supraspinatus tendon, coracoid process, and T1 transverse process.

•  Both groups had designated time for palpation practice. See Figure 2.

•  Group 1 (Control group): Palpation practice alone, no ultrasound.

•  Group 2 (Experimental group): Ultrasound tutorial, palpation practice.

•  Subjects in both groups were administered a post-session practical examination in which they were asked to locate the 4 landmarks specified above.

•  Findings were confirmed by an ultrasound-trained radiologist.

•  SPSS was used to run an independent samples t-test to compare the mean distance palpated from each landmark between the two groups.

METHODS

Group 1: Palpation practice

Group 2: Ultrasound tutorial Palpation practice

Video Session: Anatomy and palpation

of the shoulder

Practical examination

Figure 2 (Above): Protocol flow chart

REFERENCES 1. Butter J, Grant TH, Egan M, Kaye M, Wayne DB, Carrión-Carire V, McGaghie WC. “Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination?”. Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9):843-8. 2. Gregory P. Gazzillo, MD, Jonathan T. Finnoff, DO, Mederic M. Hall, MD, Yusef A. Sayeed, MD, MPH, M. Eng, Jay Smith, MD. “Accuracy of Palpating the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: An Ultrasonographic Study”. PM&R. 2011 Nov(3): 1035-1040. 3. 3D4Medical. Essential Anatomy (Version 5.0.3) [Mobile Application Software]. 4. Mircea PA, Badea R, Fodor D, Buzoianu AD. “Using ultrasonography as a teaching support tool in undergraduate medical education - time to reach a decision”. Med Ultrason. 2012 Sep;14(3):211-6. 5. Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Guirao-Piñeyro M, Castro-Martín E, Díaz-Rodríguez L. “A blended learning approach to palpation and ultrasound imaging skills through supplementation of traditional classroom teaching with an e-learning package”. Man Ther. 2012 Oct;17(5):474-8.

This study was supported by a grant from the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine and the Osteopathic Heritage Foundation.

We would like to thank all of the subjects, faculty, staff, and medical student volunteers for their contributions to this study.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Supraspinatus tendon

Biceps tendon within the bicipital groove

Coracoid process

Ultrasound imaging is a form of growing technology in clinical use, and has shown promising results when introduced into pre-clinical medical education. This randomized-controlled study was performed to determine whether the integration of ultrasound imaging will improve osteopathic medical students’ ability to locate specific shoulder anatomical landmarks. 64 subjects were recruited, signed informed consent and were randomized to one of two groups: with exposure or without exposure to an ultrasound device. Both groups were taught the structural and surface anatomy of the shoulder, and given time to practice their skills palpating the specified landmarks. Those in the ultrasound group were given instruction on sonography and how to use it to find landmarks. Following the didactic sessions, subjects in both groups were administered a post-session practical examination in which they were asked to locate each landmark. Upon analysis using independent samples t-test, subjects in the ultrasound group more accurately palpated the landmarks with a significant difference in palpation of the biceps tendon (p=0.024). These results indicate that there may be a role for the integration of ultrasound into pre-clinical curricula to improve the accuracy of palpation in osteopathic medical students.

ABSTRACT

Figure 1: Anatomic landmarks of the shoulder palpated by subjects in this study.3

Figure 3: Subjects engaging in ultrasound and palpation practice

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Long head of biceps Supraspinatus tendon Coracoid process T1 transverse process

Group 1

Group 2