The Boxall Profile and the concept of nurture at CESC · Claire Cameron, co-author Education...

22
Presented by Ursula Andrew -SENDCO and DT – Chessbrook ESC [email protected] and Jan Hegerty -Education Adviser for the Virtual School (Hertfordshire CC) [email protected] The Boxall Profile and the concept of nurture at CESC

Transcript of The Boxall Profile and the concept of nurture at CESC · Claire Cameron, co-author Education...

  • Presented by

    Ursula Andrew -SENDCO and DT – Chessbrook ESC

    [email protected]

    and

    Jan Hegerty -Education Adviser for the Virtual School

    (Hertfordshire CC)

    [email protected]

    The Boxall Profile and the

    concept of nurture at CESC

  • Aims

    Explain Nurture Group practice in an ESC for YP

    with social, emotional and mental health needs

    Show how we use a variety of assessment tools to

    gain a holistic view of the YP

    Discuss the use of the Boxall Profile when working

    with YP with attachment and SEMH needs

  • Claire Cameron, co-author Education Children

    and Young People in Care: Learning

    placements and caring schools.

    “For children to thrive and flourish and realise their

    potential, and particularly where they have had very

    difficult early childhoods, they need to be cared for in

    school and educated at home.”

  • National Statistics for CLA

    Theory of Nurture

    Nurture at CESC

    Boxall Profile

    Assessments

    Overview

  • Table 1

    Percentages of looked after children, all children and

    children in need who had at least one fixed term exclusion

    (FTE) 2011 to 2015, England.

    Source: CLA- NPD, Outcomes for Children looked after by 31

    March 2016

  • Table 2:

    Percentages of looked after children, all children who were

    permanently excluded, 2011 to 2015, England.

    2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

    Permanently excluded

    All children

    0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07

    Children looked after

    0.24 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.14

    (Source: CLA- NPD, Outcomes for Children looked after by

    31 March 2016)

  • Looked after children more likely to have social,

    emotional and mental health needs

    Looked after children and all children by primary special

    educational need, 2016, England.

  • Maslow’s hierarchy of basic human

    needs f

    experiences to the students participating but a key feature of the breakfast is that it ensures that the physiological needs of the students are met should

    any students have missed the opportunity for sustenance that morning.

  • • Centred around attachment - “emotional bond”

    with primary care giver.

    • Children become insecure when their care giver

    is not consistently available

    • 12 out of 30 children have insecure attachment

    • Children develop an internal working model (IWN)

    Theory of Nurture

  • Insecure children

    Feel unloved, worthless, uninteresting (IWM)

    See adults as unreliable and not interested in

    the school situation

    Hostile towards care givers, unresponsive

    See learning as risky

    Push teachers to provoke reactions-get a

    thrill in confirming self worth (IWM)

    Theory of nurture

  • SEMH becoming increasing challenging

    We need to bridge this gap and address YP’s

    individual needs

    Aim of nurture is to “recreate developmental

    patterns by identifying gaps”

    Nurturing can provide a safe base and support

    for these learners as a stepping stone to

    independent, effective learning

    The relevance of nurture

    to YP

  • Colley, D., 2009 Nurture groups in secondary

    schools (thesis)

    “…nurture …

    1. fully embedded into …

    2. the school …

    3. within a flexible learning area (FLA)

    4. that offers a range of support …”

    Based on the findings of this study, the Boxall

    Profile for Young People was published in 2010

    The ‘classic’ nurture group in the context of

    a mainstream setting

  • Assessment Profile-Boxall Profile and other

    assessments

    Student Nurture and Assessment Plan (SNAP)

    Monitor interventions through the SEN Code of

    Practice-Assess/Plan/Do Review

    Regular meetings with YP,DT/SLT/key adult (KA)

    with parent/carers, mainstream school, alternative

    providers

    1. KS3 meeting - every 4 weeks

    2. KS4 – every term (at least)

    How do we do this at CESC?

  • What is the Boxall Profile?

    A diagnostic and developmental

    assessment tool designed to assess the

    specific areas of need for learners through

    two questionnaires.

    It suggests an order in which to address the

    identified developmental needs and

    negative behaviours.

  • Two strands - Developmental, Diagnostic

    Series of questions centred about 5 clear cluster

    areas:

    Blocks (Developmental Strand )

    Organisation of experience

    Internalisation of controls

    Barriers (Diagnostic Profile)

    Self-limiting features

    Undeveloped behaviour

    Unsupported development

    Boxall Profile

  • Framework for the precise assessment of YP who have

    SEMH and/or attachment BP report gives teachers insights and suggests points of

    entry into a YP’s life Report helps all teachers plan focused intervention for

    YP; decide what they are already doing or have in place, and assess impact so far

    Teachers identify their priority area of need for the YP

    and plan for using suggested interventions and

    After 6 weeks (every half-term) assess the impact of

    changes made

    Boxall Profile at CESC

  • Findings: BP’s use in

    mainstream schools

    6 week reviews – staff have found this helpful to have a

    deadline and a focused plan of support

    Small steps to progress are needed which the profile helps

    break down; it is clear when the YP is not ready to access

    an intervention

    It has been useful to allocate specific tasks to 1:1 support

    staff, and ensure all key staff are clear about the YP’s

    needs

    Schools have found different ways to record impact of

    interventions

    Schools have used review to inform new targets for IEPs

    etc

  • Repeat Boxall every half-term- comparison

    Careful preparation for transition back to

    mainstream/group

    Teacher will receive several strategies to

    implement which may help the child.

    Continued support, communication when re-

    integrated

    Re-integration back to

    mainstream/groups -Outreach

  • Timeline

    Boxall Profile

    Role of the Key Adult

    Student Nurture and

    Assessment Plan (SNAP)

    Student A

  • Emotion coaching and how it worked for a

    Secondary Teacher and a student with

    challenging behaviour

    https://vimeo.com/88339296

    https://vimeo.com/88339296

  • Address SEMH and other needs with a systematic

    approach

    A view to EHCP application if needed

    Importance of a consistent team effort by

    KA/DT/SLT/teachers/support staff

    Keep theory and principles of attachment and

    nurture at core of daily interactions with YP

    Be a reflective practitioner

    Summary

  • Presented by

    Ursula Andrew -SENDCO and DT –Chessbrook

    ESC

    and

    Jan Hegerty -Education Adviser for the Virtual

    School (Hertfordshire CC)

    https://nurturegroups.org/evidence/impact-and-

    evidence/nurture-groups-secondary-schools

    The Boxall Profile and the

    concept of nurture at CESC