Test123

65
Endodontics: Procedures That Finally Make Sense

Transcript of Test123

Page 1: Test123

Endodontics:

Procedures That Finally Make Sense

Page 2: Test123

Consequences of the present way endodontics is being taught

Page 3: Test123

Rotating NiTi: continuous and interrupted

Page 4: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation

Page 5: Test123
Page 6: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.

Page 7: Test123

Aggravated by the narrow mesio-distal dimensions of the canal and the greater taper of the rotating

NiTi instruments

Page 8: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.

Page 9: Test123
Page 10: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure

in the mesio-distal plane.

Page 11: Test123

The role of mechanical instrumentation in the cleaning or root canals. Zvi Metzger, Michael Solomonov, Anda Kfir. Endodontic Topics 2013;29:87-109.

Page 12: Test123
Page 13: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight line

access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure in

the mesio-distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.

Page 14: Test123
Page 15: Test123
Page 16: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure in

the mesio-distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.6. Produces dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 17: Test123
Page 18: Test123

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both remove excess tooth structure in the mesio-

distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.6. Produces dentinal micro-cracks.7. With a non cutting tip and flutes that drive the

instrument apically, increased amounts of debris are driven apically.

Page 19: Test123

The same rotating fluted design that draws the instrument beyond the apex will also drive the debris

in front of the tip beyond the confines of the root.

Page 20: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.

Page 21: Test123

When tooth structure is excessively removed in the mesio-distal plane in teeth where the pulp is very thin in that plane, the roots become weaker.

Page 22: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the

masticatory stresses.

Page 23: Test123

Again, a result of excessive removal of tooth structure in the thinner mesio-distal plane.

Page 24: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the

masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.

Page 25: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the

masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.

Page 26: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the

masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.12. Increases procedural stress.

Page 27: Test123

When the dentist must be constantly conscious of the impact of the procedures on the integrity of the instrument rather than the integrity of the

root, it underlines the fact that he/she is using a poorly conceived product.

Page 28: Test123

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the

masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.12. Increases procedural stress.13. Still dependent upon the K-file for the glide

path.

Page 29: Test123

K-files are used manually for the creation of the glide path producing hand fatigue and tend to

impact debris apically in curved canals resulting in loss of length before rotary NiTi is employed.

Page 30: Test123

And that brings us to a far safer, more efficient, less expensive approach to endodontic instrumentation

that virtually eliminates hand fatigue and separation while preserving far more tooth

structure.

Page 31: Test123

Now let us consider 30º reciprocation of modified reamers oscillating at 3000-4000 cycles per

minute.

Page 32: Test123

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

Page 33: Test123

K-File

Relieved Reamer

Page 34: Test123

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

K-File

We use these instruments rather than k-files.

Comparing relieved vertically fluted instruments to k-files we observe the following:

1. Fewer flutes on the 16 mm of working length of a relieved vertically flutedinstrument than on a k-fileapproximately 16 flutes versus 30.

Page 35: Test123

Consequences of fewer flutes:

1. There is less engagement along length.

2. Relieved vertically fluted instruments are more flexible than files because they are less work hardened and thinner in crosssection.

3. The flutes are more vertically oriented.K-File

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

Page 36: Test123

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

K- File

Consequences of less engagement:1. Less resistance along the shank as we

negotiate apically.

Consequences of greater flexibility:1. Able to negotiate curved canals with

less chance of distortion.

Consequences of more vertically orientedflutes:1. Able to cut dentin along canal length

when the motion of the instrument iseither horizontal rotation or reciprocation.

Page 37: Test123

Taken together, the consequences of greater flexibility, lessengagement and more efficient cutting along length produce

a superior tactile perception along length and at the tip of the instrument.

Page 38: Test123

The consequences of superior tactile perception:1. Allows the safe incorporation of a cutting tip.

The consequences of a cutting tip:1. The ability to pierce pulpal tissue rather than

impact it apically.

2. The ability to distinguish between a tight canal and hitting a wall when used in awatchwinding motion or a reciprocatinghandpiece.

Page 39: Test123

The incorporation of the reciprocatinghandpiece allows a 30º arc of motionoscillating at 3000-4000 cpm.

A 30º arc of motion represents 1/12 of a circle or 5 minutes on the face of aclock.

The motion is so limited it virtually eliminates the 2 major factors that cause rotary NiTi files to break and unwind,namely, torsional stress and cyclic fatigue.

Page 40: Test123

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goesto the apex.

Page 41: Test123
Page 42: Test123
Page 43: Test123

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goesto the apex.

3. Virtually no chance of instrument separationduring the full shaping of the canal.

Page 44: Test123

A 30º arc of motion virtually eliminates torsional stress and cyclic fatigue in turn eliminating

instrument separation and dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 45: Test123

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrumentgoes to the apex.

3. Virtually no chance of instrument separationduring the full shaping of the canal.

4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio-distal plane.

Page 46: Test123

Rarely, if ever, do we exceed an 04 taper, thus preserving dentin in the mesio-distal plane while removing more tissue in the bucco-lingual plane.

Nor is straight-line access necessary.

Page 47: Test123

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrumentgoes to the apex.

3. Virtually no chance of instrument separationduring the full shaping of the canal.

4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio-distal plane.

5. Greater debris removal in the bucco-lingualplane.

Page 48: Test123
Page 49: Test123

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files thatencounter less resistance making the shapingprocedure faster.

2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrumentgoes to the apex.

3. Virtually no chance of instrument separationduring the full shaping of the canal.

4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio-distal plane.

5. Greater debris removal in the bucco-lingualplane.

6. No dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 50: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.

Page 51: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

Page 52: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.

Page 53: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.

Page 54: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.

Page 55: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by

the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steelreamers.

Page 56: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by

the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steelreamers.

13. Pushes far less debris over the apex becauseof a cutting tip and not being drawn into the

depths of the canal.

Page 57: Test123

7. Less reduction in resistance to verticalfracture.

8. Lesser tapered preparations making thetooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by

the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steelreamers.

13. Pushes far less debris over the apexbecause of a cutting tip and not beingdrawn into the depths of the canal.

14. Superior measurement control.

Page 58: Test123
Page 59: Test123

Simple predictable sequencing

(includes both the glide path and full canal shaping as part of the system)

Page 60: Test123
Page 61: Test123

30/04

30/02

Page 62: Test123
Page 63: Test123

You have been presented with a detailed rationale for modified reamers over K-files, 30º reciprocation

oscillating at 3000-4000 cycles per minute rather than continuous or interrupted rotations and the

predominant use of stainless steel 02 tapered instruments rather than greater tapered NiTi that will

increase the quantity and quality of the remaining dentin while increasing the speed and safety of your

procedures.

Page 64: Test123

The relieved reamers combined with the 30º reciprocating handpiece are commercially known as

the SafeSider Instruments and oscillate in the handpiece called the Endo-Express.

Page 65: Test123

For further information on learning these techniques call the offices of Dr. Barry Musikant.

The office number is 212-582-8161 and the address is 119 West 57th Street NYC, NY.

Our E-mail address is [email protected]

For those interested in reviewing supportingresearch it is available on request.