TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORREC

ll;;'~ ....

m

FY 1991-1992 Al~AL REPORT

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.

STATE OF TENNESSEE

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION FOURTH FLOOR, RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING· NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0465

February 26, 1993

The Honorable Ned McWherter Governor of Tennessee

and The (~eneral Assembly State "fTennessee

Ladies and Gentlemen:

CHRISTI~E J. BRADLEY COMMISSIONER

Fiscal year] 99 J -92 was a year of continued growth and improvement for the Tennessee Department of Correct ton. Three new institutions opened. ThemanagementofSouth Central Correctional Center (SCCC) was awarded to Corrections Corporation of America, making SCCC the largest privately managed facility in the country. Tennessee State ))enitentiary and DeBerry Correctional Institute closed. Expansions to three institutions were approved.

The department received very favorable reports to the federal court relating to its Court Order of 1985. The reports praised the concentrdtion of effort and improvement .. by the State, General Assem bly, and the Department of Correction in meeting the requirements of the Order. The department ,s awaiting a final Order in the case.

The progress made in the Department of Correction over the last several years reflects the quality and dedication of its staff and the support of correctional programs and services by tbe Governor and General Assembly. Special recognition goes to Jeff Reynolds, who stepped down as commissioner in November 1992.

CJIJ:SCM:JW

Tennessee Department of Correction

NCJRS

lAY 21 1993

~~CQUIS1TIONS

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice

142334

This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions slated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice.

Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by

Tenne~see Department of Corrections

to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).

Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner.

Ned McWherter, Governor Christine J. Bradley, Commissioner

February 1993

, In Memory of Gary J. Livesay May 5, 1946 - June 9, 1992

Ort June 9, 1992, we all had to part, With a dear friend who touched our hearts.

His job meant a lot to him, he worked extremely hard, And was always there when needed, he was never too tired.

He cared about people and had a heart of gold, When a person did something good, they were always told.

He was well-known and respected throughout the State, Kind and fair to all he met, having no hate.

We can always look to him as one of our brighest stars, And strive to be like him, so we too will go far.

- Donita Ford -

- 'j' •• - ". .. .... -... '. . . - .

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

The.Tennessee Department of Correction's mission is to serve the public by managing offenders safely and securely according to recognized professional standards.

The Department will carry out its mission by:

.. Implementing the orders of sentencing courts in a safe and humane manner.

.. Employing qualified staff and providing opportunities for the training and development of employees as correctional professionals.

.. Developing and implementing a department-wide total quality improvement program which provides for the effective delivery of services and the efficient use of resources.

.. Providing offenders with opportunities and incentives for positive behavior change while providing sanctions and other disincentives for continued inappropriate behavior.

.. Cooperating with other agencies and organizations to help create an effective criminal justice system.

mtlm rmmPfHT (J amtTl!Jf.

CoMilsi!ll!r'

IInI!b,j Ib.n1lin stm l'!nitBttiWIJ

c.iIr CcumJ Ibt~

IlIattnloqI CcM.nity Se'viCl! IAnt!r

lm>:villl CooIIUli tv Sevitt IAnt!r

~ro.llIgilllll time. fleility

iIoriIIuot CaTtdilllll Cmtu

SoutIltasb!rn TN stm llIgilllll Came. he.

f\j)lic IllI'crNtilll Offiar

c;;/~ !lri~ J. &-dllj, &~.i .....

I--"/~ 93 Ilatt

Department Overview

Commissioner's Staff

Grubbs Litigation Compliance Internal Audit Section Internal Affairs Section Employee Grievance Section Office of the General Counsel Planning and Research

Administratiye Services

Budget Correctional Enterprises Engineering Fiscal Services Management Infonnation Services Personnel Tennessee Correction Academy

Adult Institutions

Classification Programs Education Food Services Health Services Mental Health Ser~ices Substance Abuse Programs

East Tennessee Region

TabJe of Contents

Brushy Mountain State Penltentiary Caner County Work Camp Chattanooga Community Service Center Knoxville Community Service Center Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility Northeast Correctional Center Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility

1

5 6 7 8 8 9 9

13 17 17 17 18 19 21

25 25 27 27 27 27

33 33 34 34 35 36 36

Table of Contents (Continued)

Middle TCImessee Region

DeBerry Conoectional Institute Middle Tennessee Reception Center Nashville Community Service Center Riverbend Maximum Security Institution South Central Correctional Center Tennessee Prison for Women Tennessee S tate Penitentiary Tumey Center Industrial Prison

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility

W cst Tennessee Region

Fort Pillow Prison and Pann Lake County Regional Correctional Facility Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center . Northwest Correctional Center Wayne County Boot Camp West Tennessee High Security Facility

Community Services

Field Services Community Corrections

Systemwide Statistics

Ujrectory

Slate Map Staff Directory

Research Briefs and Publicatioos

41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44

45

53 53 54 54 55 55

59 63

69

91 92

101

Table of Illustrations

TDOC Offender PopuL'ltion 1 Felony lrunate Population 1983-1992 2 EmpJoyee Grievances 8 Expenditures By Division 13

Expenditure Summary 14 Analysis Of Unit Cost~ Of Service 15 Estimated Total. Cost Per Day Per Irunate 16 TDOC Personnel By Race And Sex 19

Adult Institution Security Positions 20 TDOC Personnel By Class 20 Cumulative School Enrollment 25 Vocational Graduates FY 1991-92 26

~

Irunate Population By Custody Level 28 Inmate Population vs. Capacity 29 TDOC Intake By County Of Conviction 30 Irunazes Incarcerated Over Ten Years 37

Irunate Deaths 45 Reported Assaults 46 Reported Assaults By Type 46, Escapes From TDOC Institutions By l.motitution 47

Escapes From TDOC Institutions By Month 47 Adult Incident Summary 48 Adult Probation Monthly Caseload FY 1983 - FY 1992 59 Adult Probation Monthly Caseload - By Region 60

Intensive Supervision Probation Caseload 60 Summary Of 1991-92 Adult Probation Activity 61 Swnm~ Of 1991-92 Intensive Fmbation Activity 62 Community Corrections Admissions 63

L-. __ • __ ~ _______ ,< ... __________________________ --i

Table of Illustrations (Continued)

Summary Of 1991-92 Conununity Corrections Activity Community Corrections Admissions By Offense Category Community Corrections Admissions By Age Community Corrections Admissions By Sex And Race LocaJ Jail Census

Systemwide Statistics

Felony Admissions By Type Felony Admissions By Age Admissions By County of Conviction By Jurisdiction Felony Admissions By Race

Felony Admissions By Sex Felony Admissions By Primary Offense Group Felony Admissions - Average Total Sentence Length Admissions By Total Sentence Length

Felony Inmate Population By Age Felony Inmate Population By Race Felony Imnate Population By Sex Felony Imnate Population By Race/Sex

Felony Inmate PopUlation By Primary Offense Group Felony Inmate Population - Average Total Sentence Length Felony Releases By Type Felony Releases By Age

Felony Releases By Sex Felony Releases By Race Felony Releases - Average Time Served Felony Releases By Primary Offense Group

Felony Release Types By Primary Offense Group Felony Releases - Average Time Served By Type of Release

64 65 65 66 67

71 71 72 74

74 75 76 77

78 78 79 79

80 81 82 82

83 83 84 85

86 87

0

0

0

0

0

0

l

Department Overview

The 998-bedSouth Central Correctional Cen-ter in Wayne County opened in March 1992. The dcparunent contracted with Corrections Corporation of America to manage this facil-ity.

The 612-bed Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DNSF) in Davidson County opened in June 1992. DSNF is the department's central health care and mental health treat-ment facility.

The 998-bed Northwest Correctional Center in Lake County opened in May 1992.

Tennessee State Penitentiary and DeBerry Correctional Institute closed in June 1992.

338-bed expansions were approved for North-east Correctional Center, South Central Cor-rectional Center, and Northwest Correctional Center.

Legislation passed creating the Parole Eligi-bility Review Board to review the sentences of all offenders sentenced as an habitual of-fender. The purpose of the review is to

ISP-INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROBATION

CC-COMNUNITY CORRECTIONS

1

0

0

determine those habitual offenders who should be granted a release eligibility date comparable to the date provided for similar offenses under the Sentencing Reform Actof 1989. If the release eligibility date under the 1989 Act is earlier than thehabilual'scurrent date, the board is authorized to amend the date. The board is also authorized to l:eview other categories of inmates convicted prior to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1989. The board is appointed by the Commissioner and stafred by the department.

The department implemented anew, greatly expanded management information system (TOMIS).

The department filed a motion to terminate the federal court order in the Grubb.s. case. A report submitted by the Special Master found the department in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Grubbs order. A hearing was held in May 1992 to discuss the remaining concerns in the case. The depart-ment is awaiting the final order from the federal judge.

~ ~

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY INMATE POPULATION END OF JUNE . 1983-1992

15000

14000

1.3000

12000

11000

10000

9000

8000

7000

6000~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992

NOTE: TDOC INHOUSE PRIOR TO 1988 DOES NOT INCLUDE INMATES IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTS: FURLOUGH, OUT TO COURT, BOND, HOSPITAL, AND ESCAPE.

DATA FOR TDOC BACKUP AND LOCAL FELONS NOT COLLECTED DEFORE 1986.

2

Commissioner's Staff

GrubbS Litigation

Grubbs was filed as a class action suit in 1980, asserting that living conditions of inmates in Tennessee's then twelve state penal institutions violated Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment guar­antees. ChiefJudge L. Clure Morton of the Middle District of Tennessee conducted a bench trial in November and December 1981. Judge Morton found seven specific conditions in various institu­tions that violated constitutional standards. He detemlined at that time, to appoint a special master and required the department to submit plans for remedying the unconstitutional conditions on a stricttimetable. Following Judge Morton's retire­ment, Grubbs was assigned to District Judge Tho­mas A. Higgins, on whose docket it remains.

In September 1991, the department filed a motion along with a supporting brief requesting that the remedial orders in this case be vacated and the jurisdiction of the Court be terminated on or before June 30, 1992, asserting that the unconstitutional conditions of confmement found by the Court in 1982 had been remedied. In October the plaintiffs in the case filed a brief in response to the state's motion to vacate, asserting that the defendants' motion was "without merit and should be denied."

In December 1991, after consultation among the court, Special Master and the parties, the court found that a scheduling order was appropriate in light of the defendant's motion for termination. The order was filed on December 17. 1991. and outlined the following requirements:

Both parties were directed to submit briefs by February 1, 1992. on th..: question of law regarding (1) whether the ~ remedial orders should extend to all adult penal institutions under the TDOC, and (2) the extent to which the plaintiffs are entitled to permanent injunctive relief on the conditions of confmement at issue in this case. A hearing was to be held 011

February 28,1992.

The Special Master was directed to file any report and recommendations regard­ing the Grubbs matrix resolution, the remedial orders of the court, and the

5

Commissioner's Staff

defendant's motion for tennination of the case on or before April 15, 1992.

A [mal hearing was scheduled for May 15, 1992, regarding (1) the respective objections of the parties to the April 15, 1992, report and recommendations of the Special Master and (2) any other matter as directed by the court.

In its brief filed in February 1992, the department stated, "As a result of the continuous efforts of the defendants to comply with the remedial measures of the Court, this litigation has achieved its broad remedial purpose. Therefore, the remedial orders of the Court do not extend to all present and future TDOC adult penal facilities because the Court's orders are institution specific. In addition, the pl~tiffs are not entitled to continuing injunctive relief beyond June 30, 1992, in this case."

The plaintiff's brief stated, "Despite the progress so painfully made over the past decade, the plain­tiffs still face serious threats to their constitutional rights, as a result of the same factors the Court identified in 1982:

... TDOC' s dilemma appears intractable. In the face of con­stantly rising numbers of pris­oners and costs of incarceration, problems over which the de­partment has no effective con­trol. increased appropriations are needed just to maintain the sta­tus quo. Yet the political cli­mate is such that the legislature is reluctant to authorize sub­stantial increases in funding for TDOC at a time when other program:;a."ebeingcut. TDOC's task is at best a formidable one.

552 F.Supp. at 1060.

The continuing intractability of this dilemmamakes permanent injunctive relief essential."

Prior to the special master submitting his report regarding the department's compliance with the Court's orders, he filed an interim report, stating tl13t significant changes had been made in both the

Fiscal Year 1991.~2 Annual Report

"design" and "operational characteristics" of the four regional prisons: Middle Tennessee Recep­tion Center (MTRC), Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility (MCRCF), Lake County Re­gional Correctional Facility (LCRCF), and South­eastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility (STSRCF). The special master was refer­ring to the construction of connectors between the guilds at these institutions, the intent of which was to allow for a reduction in the number of officers needed to supervise the guilds.

During the prior fiscal year, the special master and four court evaluators visited these institutions, as well as Tumey Center Industrial Prison and Farm (TC). The purpose of these visits was to recom­mend final population capacities at the regional facilities and to respond to the state's motion to partially double cell the new housing units at TC. The special master recommended that the COUlt defer any final action establishing capacities at these five institutions, pending review of the im­pact of the modifications at the regional facilities. Thus far, the Court has deferred any final actions in this matter, as recommended by the special master.

On April 30, 1992, the special master submitted his report to the Court In the report, the special master stated:

"There is no question that Ten­nessee has made extraordinary progress in resolving the issues which compelled the Court's intervention nearly a decade ago. Some relatively minor tasks re­main to be accomplished, but such will likely always be the casein litigation which involves vast, institutionalrefonn. More­over, once defendants have dem­onstrated both the ability and the will to manage their own affairs within the bounds of the Constitution and their own sol­emn pledges to the Court, the role of the Court can and should diminish.

Tennessee has reached such a point, and the question now be-

6

fore the Court is how best to manage that disengagement. With the exception of popula­tion growth and the specter of a return to prison overcrowding, the Special Master is persuaded that the state can be expected to manage its correctional system responsibly and without the day to day scrutiny of the Court orits officer."

However, the special master expressed concerns relating to the guild connectors and to the delivery of adequate medical and mental health services. He recommended that the department not be en­tirely released from Court oversight until certain provisions are met in these areas.

On May 15, 199£,ahearingwasheldduringwhich department officials testified on the anticipated impact of the guild connectors, the Special Needs Facility, medical services, and overall conditions of confmement within the system. The results of this hearing are pending.

Compljance

The Compliance Section provides support and assistance to all divisions by ensuring that depart­mental practices adhere to constitutional and pro­fessional standards, court recommendations, statu­tory laws, and 'IDOC policies. Historically, the Compliance Sectionhas been responsible for three major areas:

1. ~porting on the department's level of compliance with the approximately 1,500 court evaluator recommendations Wi­

der the Grubbs lawsuit.

2. The coordination of the department's accreditation ac­tivities in all work locations in­volved in the process.

3. The coordination and oversight of the department's annual in­spections of all institutions and field service operations.

Beginning in fiscal year 1992-93, the Compliance Section will also be responsible for monitoring con­tractcompIiancc of South Central Correctional Cen­ter (SCCC). This institution is being managed by Corrections Corporation of American under tenns of a contract fmalized in March 1992. SCCC is being compared to Northeast Correctional Center (NECC) and Northwest Correctional Center (NWCC) for effectiveness and efficiency of operations.

Court CompliancelProgram Evaluation. During the six month p.eriod ending December 31, 1991, visits were made to seven institutions to monitor compli­ance with evaluator recommendations under the Grubbs lawsuit. In addition, one audit of inmate employment was conducted, along with six follow­ups on previous audits of inmate employment.

In April 1992, in consultation with the special mas­ter, the Compliance Report to the Special Masterwas completed, in anticipation of the June 30, 1992, deadline for completion of the ~ mandates. This report analyzed the overall status of the major operational areas of the department. The areas included were: Classification, Education, Inmate Employment, CET, Security, and Institutional Envi­ronment. The area of Health Services was not addressed due to the ongoing review of the system by the special master and the anticipated impact the Special Needs Facility will have on the system. This report was used by the special master in developing his April 30 report to the Court.

Accreditation. During Fiscal Year 1991-92, five TDOC institutions passed their initial accreditation audits by the American Correctional Association (ACA), and four others passed reaccreditation au­dits. By the end of the fiscal year, all department institutions had completed the accreditation process through the ACA, with the exception of the newest institutions.

Those institutions completing their initial accredita­tion audits include Brushy Mountain State Peniten­tiary (October), Fort Pillow Prison and Farm (June), Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (Febru­ary), Turney Center Industrial Prison and Farm (March),andWestTennesseeHighSecurityFacility (November). All of the above-mentioned institu­tions, with the exception of Fort Pillow Prison and Farm, were also fonnally accredited during fiscal year 1991-92. Fort Pillow was officially accredited

7

Commissioner's Staff

in August 1992 after completing the accredita­tion audit in June 1992.

The institutions that passed reaccreditation au­dits during fiscal year 1991-92, included Carter County Work Camp (January), Chattai'looga Community Service Center (November), Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center (September), and Tennessee Prison for Women (September). Carter County Work Camp was officially reaccredited in April, while the other three institutions were all formally reaccredited in January 1992.

By the end of the fiscal year, the Department of Correctionhad 15 nationally accredited institu­tions, with the 16th, Fort Pillow Prison and Farm, accredited in August 1992.

One additional department institution fonnally entered the accreditation process during fiscal year 1991-92, bringing the total number of institutions involved in the accreditation pro­cess to 17. Northeast Correctional Center in Mountain City formally entered the accredita­tion process in April, with a formal accreditation audit expected during fiscal year 1992-93.

Annual Inspections. Annual inspections are detailed observations and reports of the appear­ance, physical condition, and overall operation of each institution and field service program. These inspections are conducted by teams con­sisting of central office, institution, and field personnel. Reinspections, if necessary, are scheduled and conducted within 90 days follow­ing the completion of the original inspection. During the past year, 17 institutions and nine regional probation offices were inspected.

Internal Audit

Internal Audit is responsible for conducting all fiscal audits within the Department of Correc­tion as assigned by the commissioner. During fiscal year 1991-92, Internal Audit completed commissary audits at all nine institutions be,ing accredited or re-accredited by ACA. Commis­sary audits are one of the mandatory standards for accreditation by ACA. Investigative audits assigned by the commissioner were also com-

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

pie ted during this period of time. Major internal control deficiencies were discovered and recom­mendation::: were made that will effect savings of much time and money for the department. In the latter part of the fiscal year, Internal Audit began a general audit of Northeast Correctional Center.

Internal Affairs Section

The Internal Affairs Section conducts invesHga­tions specially authorized by the commissioner and are limited to matters relating to the operations of the department. Three investigative inquiries were completed by Central Office Internal Affairs during the fiscal year and 61 investigative inquir­ies were completed by regional internal affairs personnel. The principal types of investigative matters were drugs, staff misconduct, escapes and deaths in the adult institutions. The section con­tinued to work closely with various federal, state, and municipal and county investigative agencies. This resulted in the mutual sharing of intelligence infonnation, sharing of technical services, and infonnant development. A number of investiga­tive matters were referred to attorney generals throughout the state for possible prosecution.

-~-- ------~----

Employee Grieyance Section

The Employee Grievance Section is a resource for department employees with respect to correct procedures for resolving grievances and assists in establishing consistent actions. Classes for senior managers and pre-supervisors are conducted at the Tennessee Correction Academy. These classes focus on civil service concepts and procedures for disciplinary and grievance actions. Monthly and quarterly reports are distributed to assist in the establishment of consistency by allowing person­nel to better monitor cases and provide feedback to the field.

During the fiscal year, a total of 103 grievances was submitted. Of this number, 68 decisions were upheld, 9 decisions were overturned, and 14 were deemed nongrievable. A total of 12 were resol ved without a hearing. Over 98 percent of the griev­ances were submitted by adult institutions' staff.

EXPI£Tfi:E GRJEVAN:::ES

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

'l'OTAI. RESOINED GRIE.'I.1'AN::E lECISIW m::ISIW IIEE20IED WITHe",!'

DIVISION SOBMI'l"l'ED UPHEID 0VER'mRNED ~ HEAP..ING

AmrB INSTITOTIWS 101 66 9 14 10

camDNITY SERVJ:CES 2 2 0 0 2

AanNIS'mATIVE SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0

rorAI. 103 68 9 14 12

WRI'l"lml WARNIUGS REVIEWED -57

8

OOice of the General CQunsel

The Office of General Counsel to the Corrunis­sioner represents the commissioner in legal and administrative proceedings where the deparunent is involved. The office assists the Office of the Attorney General, Civil Rights and Clain1s Sec­tion, in defending against the approxinlately 300 lawsuits filed annually by inmates in federal and state courts across the state. This process was complicated over the past eighteen months by a temporary declination of representation of some employees by the Office of the Attorney General. The department coordinated defense counsel across the state and developed procedures in writing for all levels of employees to follow. Further, the Office ao;;sists the Office of the Attorney General, Civil Litigations Section, in handling the appeals of employee grievances from the Civil Service Commission.

The Office of the General Counsel oversees the development of depanmental policy, assists insti­tutions in local policy issues which may be unique to the facility, and implements the review of all policies on a regular basis.

The Office of the General Counsel continued the practice of teaching at the training academy and going to the facilities to maintain communication with employees. A significant amount of time daily is devoted to fielding questions by telephone when employees are concerned about the legal implications of a situation. Each member of the Office led sessions at workshops involving records and confidentiality, disciplinary and grievance hearings. The TOMIS project called on the Office

9

Commissioner's Staff

of General Counsel to assist in reconciling ap­proximately 1,200 irrunediate problems arising from sentences which were either illegal or incom­plete as submitted. Increasingly, the Office acted as a facilitator on behalf of the department with Federal and State judiciary, claims commission­ers, prosecutors offices as well as defense counsel. The Office continued to administer detainers and to maintain files on inmates transferred under the Interstate Compact.

Planning and Research

The Planning and Research Section provides in­formation, analysis, and research to assist in im­proving the depanment 's management and opera­tion. The section responded to numerous inforn1a­tion requests from the General Assembly, federal court monitors, and other outside agencies. The section maintained reponing systems for institu­tional incident repons, monthly felon populations and movements, jail populations, and the drug treatment program. Special studies inFY 1991-92 included a revision of the probation initial risk assessment scale, a study of the depanment' s use of minimum-restricted custody classification, and a study of the diversionary effectiveness of com­munity alternative programs in cooperation with East Tennessee State University. The section also assisted in developing new dlita collections sys­tems and in improving the reliability and accuracy of existing data systems. The section produced this annual repon. A listing of other available repons and Research Briefs produced by Planning and Research is included at the end of this repon.

Administrative Services Leon Joyner

Assistant Commissioner

Budget

The budget section is responsible for coordinating the proper development, submission, and use of the department's operating budget. Technical assistance is provided to the field units in the development and management of the operating budgfi!t. The budget section aJso monitors, re­vises, and authorizes expenditure of the deparunent' s operating funds and revenuecollec­tions, prepares financial information and special projects for the legislative branch including fiscal impact of proposed legislation from the General Ass~mbJy, monitors the closing capabilities of the department, and serves as liaison between the wardens and directors of the department and Finance and Administration's budget section.

During FY 1991-92, the budget section, in con­junction with field and central office staff, oper­ated under restricted hiring and purchasing proce-

Administrative Services

dures as directed by the Departments of Finance and Administration and Personnel. Strict expendi­ture controls were imposed statewide due to undercollection of tax revenues. These controls restricted commodity acquisition and required the department to maintain evaluated position va­cancy levels. The department reverted approxi­mately $2,500.000 as a result of FY 1991-92 operations which represented only .85% of the department's allounent.

During FY 1991-92, the budget section continued the process of phasing-down funding at Tennessee State Penitentiary and DeBerry Correctional Insti­tute in concurrence with the department's goal to close both facilities by June 30, 1992. Additional funds were appropriated to begin operations at South Central Correctional Center, Northwest Cor­rectional Center, and the Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility during the last two quarters of FY 1991-92.

EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92

13

• AD~INISTRATION

IZIAOULT SERVICES

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

ADULT COMMUNfIY EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT ADMIN1S1RA 110N SERVIL'ES SERVICES TOTAL

Regular Salaries $8,437,100 $80,048,500 $8,708,800 $97,194,400 Longevity 351,600 2,957,100 387,300 3,696,000 Overtime 165,800 5,184,900 50,700 5,401,400

Employee Benefits 2,037,700 21,863,900 2,123,900 26,025,500

Total Personal Services & Benefits $10,992,200 $110,054,400 $11,270,700 $132,317,300

Travel $662,800 $I,8U7,700 $436,800 $2,907,300

Printing. Duplicating & Binding 120,000 663,800 81,000 864,800

Utilities and Fuel 522,800 10,235,200 1,600 10,759,600

Connnunications 155,000 495,000 122,300 772,300

Maintenance. Repairs & Service 453,900 1,618,600 23,200 2,005,700

Professional Services & Dues 4,088,100 22.531,100 501,400 27,120,600

Supplies & Materials 1,671,900 20,874,800 160,200 22,706,900 Rentals and Insurance 880,800 1,854,900 986,700 3,722,400

Motor Vehicle Operations 200,200 371,500 500 572,200

Awanls and Indemnities 831,200 3,482,000 5,500 4,318,700 Grants and Subsidies 29,500 63,970,000 4,574,800 68,574,300 Unc1a:;sifierl 700 1,100 100 1,900

Stores for ResaIe/Reissue/Manufacture 3,974,900 4,328,000 0 8,302,900 Equipment 419,300 2,106,000 51,500 2,576,800

Buildings 254,100 13,100 0 201,200 Discounts Loot 0 (:00 0 600

Highway Ccnsttuction 0 1,100 0 1,100

Total Other Expenditures 14265200 134,354.500 6,945,600 155,565300

GRANDTUfAL $25.257,400 $244,408,900 $18,216,300 $287,882,600

RJNDING SOURCES

State Appropriation $12,950,300 $238,011,500 $18,082,200 $269,044,000

Fedeml 19,700 7,400 0 27,100

Counties 0 0 0 0 Cities O· 0 0 0

Non-Governmental 0 0 0 0 Current Services 1,640,900 5,266,200 134,100 7,041,200

Inter-Departmental 10,026,300 1,123,800 0 11,150,100

Reserves 620,200 0 0 620,200

PERSONNEL

FullTiJre 429 5,714 449 6,592

PartTiJre 13 0 0 13 Seasonal 0 0 0 0

Total 442 5,714 449 6,605

14

Administrative Services

ANALYSIS OF lINIT COSTS OF SERVICE FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

AVERAGE OCCliPANT FOOD CLOTIUNG DRlIG

DAILY COST COSI' COSI' COST INSTITllTIO N COliNT PER DAY PER DAY PER YEAR PER YEAR

BRUSHY MOUNTAIN STATE PENITENTIARY 434 63.96 2.57 168.34 213.86

CARTER COUNTY WORK CAW.o.P 184 43.67 2.38 142.43 124.72

OIATTANOOGA COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 106 48.89 2.02 148.00 136.79

DEBERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITU1E 223 72.86 2.79 .. .. DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITY 4 2,542.14 .... .... ....

FORT Pll..LOW PRISON AND FARM 642 47.42 2.66 123.60 145.87

KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 134 44.81 2.60 85.28 100.00

LAKE COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 710 40.20 2.78 60.01 105.83

MARK LUTTRELL RECEPrION CENTER 385 55.64 2.50 78.02 231.07

MIDDLE TENNESSEE RECEPTION CENTER 583 45.41 2.53 200.00 197.62

MORGAN COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 794 40.31 230 66.37 180.73

NASHVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER 315 37.85 2.57 121.91 49.27

NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 934 37.90 3.04 140.00 194.00

NORTHWEST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 9 986.49 .... .... ....

RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION 571 62.35 3.07 72.00 150.73

SOUTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER 173 78.56 .... •• .'" SOUI'HEASTERN TENNESSEE STATE

REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 795 40.74 2.27 116.00 221.25

TENNESSEE PRISON FOR WOMEN 343 61.62 2.28 159.00 153.42

TENNESSEE STATE PENITENTIARY 491 97.64 3.44 • .. ruRNEY CENTER INDUSlRIAL PRISON 689 50.43 2.54 74.00 176.00

WAYNE COUNTY BOOT CAMP 133 50.76 2.72 96.00 61.96

WEST TENNESSEE mGH SECURITY FACILITY 600 47.29 2.82 97.16 161.45

TOTAL 9,252 52.85 2.67

• INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE; INSTITUTIONS HAVE CLOSED ... INFORMATION NOT APPLICABLE; INSTITUTIONS ARE PHASING IN OPERATIONS

15

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ACTUAL YEAR 1991-92

ESTIMA TED TOTAL COST PER DAY, PER INMATE FOR THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ADULT INSTITUTIONS

OPERATIONAL COST (1)

ADMINISTRATIVE COST

COST FACTORS

STATEWIDE COST ALLOCATION (INDIRECT COST)

CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES COST (2)

MAJOR MAINTENANCE COST

CAPITAL MAINTENANCE COST (3)

TRAINING ACADEMY COST

TOTAL COST PER DAY

(1) OPERATIONAL COST REFLECTS DIRECT EXPENDITURES FOR ALL

ADULT INSTITUTIONS

(2) REVENUe OFF-SET

(3) CAPITAL MAINTENANCE FUNDS ARE NOW APPROPRIATED DIRECTLY

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION

CAPITAL PROJECT COST ALLOCATION FOR FY 91/92

TOTAL COST INCLUDING CAPITAL

16

$52.85

1.97

0.14

3.37

0.19

0.00

0.55

$59.07

$2.93

$62.00

CQrrectional Enterprises

Correctional Entcrprises of TelUlcssee (CET), in conjunction with institutional wardens, manages the overall operations of manufacturing and farm operations within TDOC. CET emphasizes edu­cation by requiring an imnale to obtain aGED Certificate in order to be hired for a skilled posi tion to support these operations. Training is provided in speciiic manufacturing and fanning processes to aU inmates and teaches realistic work habits that are necessary for any job.

CET's 17 factories and 4 fanns produce high quality goods and services. Products produced through CET's programs are consistently moni­tored to maintain quality, serviceability and com­petitive prices. CET strives to meet and exceed market demands and expectations while providing products and services to tax-supported agencies and non-profit organizations.

The fann operation includes a central garage opcmtion. Two dairies have complete processing plants with half-pint cartoning, as well as bulk packaging. Last year's goal was reached to pro­vide two-percent milk along with whole milk. Plans are to expand into juices and chocolate milk.

CET fanns are also a source of training for senior veterinary students with the University ofTelUles­see. The university brings students to the fann to do health work. There is little other 0PP'4r£unity for students to treat large animals before graduat­ing as veterinarians. Correctional farms has pro­vided livestock, ~taff and resources to do numer­ous research projects both with the University of TelUlessee Veterinary Teaching Hospital and the Agriculture Extension staff.

CET broke from traditional industry programs in FY 1991-92 when TDOC received federal ap­proval to participate in the Private Sector/Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (known as the PIE program). The PIE program allows CET to contract with private companies to produce goods for sale to markets outside state, city and local governments. Presently, CET em­ploys approximately 50 inmates under a PIE con­tract. The inmates receive minimum wage from which deductions for cost of incarceration, taxes,

17

Administrative Services

victim restitution and mandatory savingsare taken. It is CET's goal to continue to expand this alterna­tive to traditional work programs seeking inten­sive work progrruns that are prcsently being sent out of the country by private companies.

Em:ineerjng

The Engineering Section forms an administrative bridge between institutional managers and the architects, engineers, and contractors providing services to them. This section prepares mainte­nance budgets, new construction programs, cost proposals, and maintenance policy. Engineers review construction plans, specifications. and com­pleted work as well as investigate new building sites.

Construction projects, planned and funded in the 1985 Special Legislative Session are complete. Two additional medium security prisons and a special needs prison were completed in FY 1991-92. Construction began in September 1992 on housing additions at Northeast, Northwest, and South Central Correctional Centers. These three additions will be complete in late 1993 and will add 1,014 beds to our system.

Fiscal Services

The Fiscal Services Section is responsible for continuing to improve the deparunent's financial accountability through the state's Financial mteg­rity Act. The section also assures prompt and accurate payment of the deparunent's fmancial obligations. Technical assistance is provided to the field operating units in developing and main­taining integrity in the financial management SySN tern. The section is the liaison between TDOC and the Deparunents of Finance and Administration and General Services, Comptroller of the Trea­sury, and several other state deparunents.

During the fiscal year, the most significant activity was the implementation of the Tennessee Of­fender Management Infonnation System (TOMIS) trust fund accounting program. This program includes the processing of commissary sales as a

:Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

dircct update for the irunatc's trust fund. All facilities with ilUnate trust funds were converted from the OBSCIS program to the TOMIS program on June 1. 1992.

The section continued its emphasis on the follow­up implementation of actions included in the department's response to the latest audit report issued by the Division of S tate Audit of the Office of the Comptroller of the Treasury. Also contin­ued was the expenditures reporting program that was implemented to strengthen the department's oversight of fiscal activity.

Mana"ement InformatioQ Services

Management Infonnation Services provides sen­tence management infonnation, computerized infonnation reporting, technical assistance in the design and development of computerized systems, and fonns and publications service. The section calculates all felon sentences, maintains all inmate records of offenders who have been in the system, and monitors the release dates for the Board of Paroles in order to produce the parole dockets.

System Development Services. For more than three years the Department of Correction has been working on a massive project to computerize the entire operation of the department's institutions and field offices. As a result of tIllS effort, on February 3,1992, the department brought on-line what we believe to be the most comprehensive computer system ever developed in the field of state corrections. the Tennessee Offender Man­agement Infonnation System (TOMIS).

The department manages more than 40,000 of­fenders in correctional institutions, parole and probation offices, and community corrections grant programs. TOMIS automates all infonnation about these offenders from the time of their con­viction until they are released from all supervisory authority.

The equipment and network requirements for TOMIS resulted in the jnstallation of more than 1,400 computer tenninals and printers throughout the state. In institutions, tenninals now reside on the desks of administrative personnel, in housing

18

units, count rooms, visitation areas, property rooms, clinics and commissaries. Probation and parole officers also have them in their offices to manage their caseload supervision.

TOMIS maintains data in all major activities occurring in the correctional mllilagement process beginning with the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report and cominuing through conviction and sentencing, incarceration, offender treatment, and parole and probation management.

The easy retrieval of TOMIS data enables the entire corrections system to function more effi­ciently. The need for written records with numer­ous copies for all concerned has been greatly reduced.

Sentence Management Services. Sentence Man­agement Services continued to provide training on sentence computation and modification. Several SMS supervisors were assigned full time to the TOMIS project where they provided technical advice on the design and testing of the TOMIS sentencing menu. Another revision of the SMS portion of the MIS Operational Procedures Hand­book was undertaken to reflect the conversion to TOMIS. Technical assistance was provided to sheriffs departments, particularly in the area of reporting sentence reduction credits.

Operational Surmort Services. Beginning in Janu­ary 1992 and continuing through the TOMIS conversion, Operational Support Services loaded over 600 user group profiles. The user group profile manages the security access to every con­versation (transaction) in TOMIS. Including cor­rectional institutions, Board of Parole. Probation, Community Corrections, TEMA, and the Tennes­see Sentencing Commission, there are in excess of 5,700users with access to various conversations in the TOMIS system.

In addition to the TOMIS activities, Operational Support Services processed more than 10,000 inquiries on offenders, more than 23,000 offender file folders were fihned, and over 192,000 pieces of mail were processed.

Personnel

The Personnel Section monitors and provides training for the personnel functions of the depart­ment for compliance with civil service rules, state law, and policies and procedures. The section also monitors training, performance evaluations, and employee assistance programs to enhance em­ployee effectiveness. The section developed and monitored the department's affmnative action plan. The unit continues to coordinate systems to deal with the modified hiring freeze.

The unit's major effort for FY 1991-92 was the placement of employees from the Tennessee State Penitentiary and the DeBerry Correctional Insti~ lute as they closed. Over 600 employees were placed into other positions, with most having to come off civil service registers.

Administrative Services

The DeBerry Special Needs Facilily was opened with a range of position classifications not previ­ously used by the department. The establishment of the Correctional Treatment Technician and the Correctional Treatment Technician Supervisor presented promotional opportunities for 185 em­ployees.

The Northwest Correctional Center opened during the fiscal year and presented challenges to back fill and train large numbers of new employees as well as providing extensive promotional opportunities for employees in the West Tennessee area.

The department began incremental steps toward staffmg standards adopted during the fiscal year.

rooe PERSONNEL BY RACE AND SEX JUNE .30, 1992

MINORITY FEMALE

MINORITY MALE 11.6"

WHITE FEMALE 23.3"

7.9%

TOTAL PERSONNEL - 5,073

19

WHITE MALE 57.2"

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

2000

1500

1000

o

ADULT INSTITUTION SECURITY POSITIONS JUNE 3D, 1992

o TOTAL

l1li FILLED

• INCLUDES ~IT MANAGERS. INt.lATE RELATIONS COORDINATORS. CORRECTIONAL CLERICAL OFFICERS

105 104 85 82

SfJIGEANT UElmHANI' POSITION

TDOC PERSONNEL BY CLASS JUNE 3D, 1992

MAINTENANCE AOt.4INISTRA TION SKILLE02.S" 2.SlI:

69 64-

CAPTAIN UNT IIGT. *

CLERICAL 3.1"

PARA-PROFESSIONAL S.Oll:

8.3" PROFESSIONAL

20

19.2lI:

TECHNICIAN 6.1:1:

Tennessee Correction Academy

The Tcnncssee Correction Academy's mission is to establish, maintain, and promote professional standards through the provision of quality training programs. Throughout the year, the Academy continued its focus on employee skills enrichment programs and professional growth activities.

In order to achieve its mission for the department, the Academy utilized a wide variety of means through which substantive training could be pro­vided for 6,249 personnel. Academy instructors, for example, developed nearly half the core cur­riculum courses which were delivered on-site at institutions statewide. Also, 679 personnel were trained by Academy instructors at 14 different work-sites during the year.

Academy-based training, in addition to its on­going pre-service programs for new personnel,

21

Administrative Services

provided 40 specialized and job-specific training programs. Such diverse offerings include Train the Trainer progranuning for Tennessee Offender Management Infonnation System (TO MIS) users, Tactical Team Training, Crisis Simulation Pro­gramming. Emergency Medical Technician Certi­fication Training, and Hostage Negotiator Train­ing. The Academy also became the first state correctional training center in the nation to be sanctioned as an independent Fireanns Instructor Certification provider by the National Rifle Asso­ciation.

'The Training Advisory Committee. which ser~cd as the Commissioner's chief mechanism for pro­gram oversight and approval, provide creative leadership and support essential to the Academ y' s efforts to offer innovative training options at re­duced costs while still meeting accreditation stan­dards.

Adult Institutions Charles Bass

Assistant Commissioner

ClassificatioD Programs

The Classification Section is responsible for the implementation and maintenance of the system of managing the progression of inmates from intake into TDOC custody through the period of incar­ceration.

The classification process evaluates infonnation concerning assessed needs of inmates to aid in making appropriate recommendations conceming programs and levels of supervision. A major objective is to involve inmates in programs in the least restrictive setting consistent with the safety and protection of the public, TDOC staff and other inmates. Emphasis is given to custody, i.e., nec­essary levels of supervision as detennined from the recency, severity and frequency of an individual's institutional conduct and offense con­viction history. The process of evaluation occurs continually throughout an inmate's period of in­carceration, and is managed at the institutional level by correctional classification coordinators.

lnfornmtion from the inmate needs assessment process is collected and maintained for use in the inmate program and departmental planning pro­cess.

This section is also responsible for ensuring that institutional inmate population levels do not ex-

Adult Institutions

ceed limits established by federal court mandate. This is accomplished by authorizing a<.lmissions of inmates to the department from county jails on a daily basis contingent upon the in-house popula­tion count. Further, the section monitors and approves, on the basis of population levels, inter­institutional transfers of irunates.

Education

The Education Section provides staff support to the department's institutional educational pro­grams. These services include grant and entitle­ment program development and monitoring; cur­riculum frameworks and guides; technical assis­tance; liaison between the department and other agencies; and Career Ladder evaluation and pay­ment coordination.

Significant events during !he fiscal year include: implementation of a new academic curriculum; expansion of the G.E.D. testing program; and reorganization of G.E.D. records.

The total number of irunates receiving some type of educational service increased from 7,735 in FY 1990-91 to 7,919 during this fiscal year. The number of inmates that passed the G.E.D. in­creased from 382 in FY 1990-91 to 462 in FY 1991-92.

CUMULATIVE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT ADUL T INSTITUTIONS

FY 1991-92 3000

2818 N Total Participants = 7.919 U t.425OO B E R 2072

02000

f"

: 1500 R T

61000 I P A N 500 T S 139

0 ABE/GEO ABE/GEO ABE/GEO VOL COLLEGE VOC VOL

f"T PT SEG LIT EO NIGHT TYPE OF" TRAINING

25

VOCATIONAL GRADUATES FY 91·92

INSTITUTION

DMSP LCRCF MLRC MTRC MCRCF NCSC RMSI

VOCATION

AUTO MECHANICS 13

BARBERING 9

BUILDING TRADES 18 22 3 29

CABINET MAKING/MILLWORK:S 7

CLOTHING PRODUCTION

COMMERCIAL CLEANING 4 20 10

COMMERCIAL FOODS 16 16

CONSTRUCTION MAINT. TDS.

~ COSMETOLOGY

ELECTRICITY 14

GRAPHIC ARTS 16

GREENHOUSE OPER. & MGT. 12 14 .

H.A.C. & R. 21 17 11

INTERIOR FINISH 16

LANDSCAPING

MASONRY 14

PLUMBING & P. F. 17

UPHOLSTRY 17

VOC. OFF. OCC. 28 6

WELDING 12

TOTALS 4 162 39 14 79 45 39 "--- _._- ---- - --

* Does not include 57 inmates trained for CET sewing operation.

STSRCF TPW TC

3

1

2

*4

4 5 10

37

8 6

6 2

5

8

4

*23 54 28

WTHSF TOTAL I

i

13

12

73

9

4

34

51

37

14

14

16

26

57

21

8

5 19

17

17

38

12

5 492

~ _. t:I.l n ~ -~ ~ .., 1-1. \0 1,,0 1-1.

B

\0 N

> = = = e:. ~ ttl '0 o .., '""'"

Food Services

The Food Services Section coordinates the food service operations in all the institutions. Advice and assistance are provided on operational matters such as sanitation, controlling food costs, and food preparation. Compliance with TDOC policies and ACA standards is monitored by institutional visits and annual inspections.

During fiscal year 1991-92, over 10,946,000 meals were served in the department. The food expendi­ture included: $9,750,000 state funds and $515,774 in U.S. Department of Agriculture commodities, for an average cost per day of $2.68.

Since mealtime is of considerable importance for inmates the annual food preference survey was conducted to help determine their preferences. The master menu was revised to reflect those preferences. The master menu is approved by a registered dietitian and meets the nutritional re­quirements for adults according to the recom­mended dietary allowances.

Health Services

The Health Services Section develops policies, provides guidance and assistance to institutional health activities and monitors health services con­tracts at affected institutions. The section also consolidates department-wide health services sta­tistical data, monitors admissions to private hospi­tals and coordinates the transfer of patients from contract faciIi ties to DeBerry Special Needs Facil­ity.

DeBerry Special NecdsFacility opened in August 1992, coinciding with the closings at DCI and the Tennessee State Penitentiary Health Center.

In response to OSHA requirements for protecting employees from blood borne pathogens, an expo­sure control plan was developed and designates trainers from each institution were instructed on how to implement the plan.

Health care personnel from each institution have been selected to participate in the annual inspec­tion process. These inspections are recognized as an integral part of the quality asSUT.'ance process.

27

Adult Institutions

Health services inspectors developed a reviewers handbook for inspectors to insure more consistent SCOling on inspections.

Mental Health Services

Mental health services are made available to all adult offenders incarcerated within the TDOC system. The director of mental health programs is responsible for monitoring and coordinating the overall delivery of mental health services state­wide. A series of mental health policies and ACA standards govern the implementation of all mental health services. Institutional visits and annual inspections promote continued compliance with established standards.

The newly opened Lois DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) will serve as the nucleus for the department's mental health care; 288 beds have been designated exclusively for the provision of mental health intervention. Additionally, 96 beds have been allotted for the intensive treatment of adult sex offenders. All TDOC institutions will have access to various treatment components at DSNF.

Substance Abuse PrQllramS

The purpose of the Substance Abuse Program is to provide drug involved offenders with an opportu­nity to change past drug abusing behaviors by providing access to treatment interventions de­signed for varying levels of need and motivation.

The department received $984,000 in federal fund­ing from the Bureau of Justice Assistance in fiscal year 1991-92for substance abuse treatment. Dur­ing 1991-92, a total of 1,600 offenders were accepted and received direct treatment services: 1,138 offenders in TDOC institutions and 562 offenders on probation. Federal funds were also used to develop other in-house institutional pro­grams ..

Because of the need to provide treatment services to a heterogeneous population, a range of treat­ment services have been incorporated into the substance abuse programs. Treatment services include: psychoeducational modules, drug educa-

Fiscal Year 1991a 92 Annual Report

lion, outpatient and inpatient community services, therapeutic community. and structured self-help groups. A speciillized community supervision program was developed for Division X Criminal Court in Shelby County. About 235 received probation services through this court.

Federally-funded institutional programs and their average monthly census included:

- 8-week educational program - 187 - 12-week Recovery Dynamics program - 35 - Therapeutic Community - 32

A transitional release program is available for offenders released to community supervision in metropolitan count ies t oal are in need of continued substance abuse treatment. Self-help programs,

Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anony­mous, as well as educational materials are also available to inmates.

Federally-funded probation programs and their average monthly census included:

- 28-day inpatient treatment - 33 - Aftercare services - 17

- 16-week outpatient treatment programs - 103 - Halfway house placements - 4 - Educational programs - 20

Federal funds were used for regional substance abuse coordinators in the four largest metropolitan areas to direct offenders with substance abuse problems to various department and community programs, including self-help programs.

INMATE POPULATION BY CUSTODY LEVEL

June 30, 1992

28

Adult Institutions

INMATE POPULATION VS. CAPACITY AS OF JUNE.30, 1992

ASSIGNED DESIGNATED PERCENT lNSTIfUI10N POPULATION CAPACIIY CAPACITY

BRUSHY MOUNTAlN STATE PENITENTIARY 453 495 91.5

CARTER COUNTY WORK CAMP 193 210 91.9

CHATI ANOOGA COl\1MUNITY SERVICE CEN1ER 123 120 102.5

DEBERRYSPEClALNEEDS FACllATY * 199 5SO 36.2

FORT PILWW PRISON AND FARM 6S8 700 94.0

KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENfER 152 150 101.3

LAKE COUNTY REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 765 7IS 96.6

MARK LUTTRELL RECEPTION CENfER 395 411 98.1

MIDDLE TENNESSEE RECEPTION CENTER 51f7 594 98.8

MORGAN COUNI'Y REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ms 791 102.1

NASHVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE CENJ'ER 321 32S 98.8

NORTHEAST CORRECTIONAL CENTER 938 960 97.7

NORTH~TCORRECTIONALCENTER· 202 960 21.0

RIVERBEND MAXIMUM SECURIfY INSfITUTlON S82 574 10L4

SOUIH CENIRAL C0RRECl10NAL CENTER 963 960 100.3

SOUfHEASfERN TENNESSEE STATE REGIONAL CO~ONALFACllJTY fl)O 782 102.3

TENNESSEE PRISON FOR WOMEN 3SO 341 102.6

1lJRNI<..Y CENTER lNDUSfRIAL PRISON en 728 94.9

WAYNE COUNrY BOOr CAMP 146 150 97.3

WEST 1ENNESSEE IllGI-I SECURITY FACILITY 609 606 100.5

TOfAL

• Facilities opened in late 1991~92; not at operating capacity as of June 30.

29

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

TDOC INTAKE BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION FY 1991·92

COUNTY ADMISSIONS COUNTY ADMISSIONs

ANDERSON 1.4% LAUDERDALE 0.9% BEDFORD 0.6% LAWRENCE 0.2% BENTON 0.5% LEWIS 0.1% BLEDSOE 0.2% LINCOLN 0.4% BLOUNT 1.2% LOUDON 0.2% BRADLEY 1.2% MACON 0.2% CAMPBELL 0.2% MADISON 3.5% CANNON 0.1% MARION 0.4% CARROLL O.lf% MARSHALL 0.6% CARTER 0.9% MAURY 1.0% CHEATHAM 0.2% MCMINN 0.7% CHESTER 0.2% MCNAIRY 0.0%

CLAIBORNE 0.1% MEIGS 0.0% CLAY 0.0% MONROE 0.4% COCKE 0.6% MONTGOMERY 0.9% COFFEE 1.0% MOORE 0.0% CROCKETT 0.2% MORGAN 0.1% CUMBERLAND 0.5% OBION 0.5% DAVIDSON 11.4% OVERTON 0.1% DECATUR 0.2% PERRY 0.0% DEKALB 0.2% PICKEIT 0.1% DICKSON 0.4% POLK 0.2% DYER 0.9% PUTNAM 0.3% FAYETTE 0.7% RHEA 0.3%

FENTRESS 0.2% ROANE 0.3% FRANKLIN 0.4% ROBERTSON 0.5% GIBSON 1.3% RUTHERFORD 1.0% GILES 0.3% SCOIT 0.2% GRAINGER 0.2% SEQUATCHIE 0.1% GREENE 0.6% S~VIER 0.6% GRUNDY 0.0% SHELBY 20.3% HAMBLEN 0.8% SMITH 0.1% HAMILTON 12.1% STEWART 0.1% HANCOCK 0.2% SULLIVAN 3.4% HARDEMAN 0.1% SUMNER 1.7% HARDIN 0.6% TIPTON 0.6%

HAWKINS 0.9% TROUSDALE 0.1% HAYWOOD 0.5% UNICOI 0.5% HENDERSON 0.5% UNION 0.1% HENRY 0.4% VANBUREN 0.0% HICKMAN 0.1% WARREN 0.2% HOUSTON 0.1% WASHINGTON 1.8% HUMPHREYS 0.3% WAYNE 0.0% JACKSON 0.2% WEAKLEY 0.5% JEFFERSON 0.3% WHITE 0.4% JOHNSON 0.1% WILLIAMSON 1.9% KNOX 9.0% WILSON 1.2% LAKE 0.1% COUNTY UNKNOWN 0.1%

30

East Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Linda Dodson, Acting

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary Carter County Work Camp

Chattanooga Community Service Center Knoxville Community Service Center

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility Northeast Correctional Center

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary. Petros

Warden" Don Eberhart Opcned - 1896 Reopened - 1976 Designated Capacity - 495 Average Daily Population - 434 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

Adult Institutions

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary (BMSP) is the reception, classification and diagnostic center for East Tennessee. It was originally built as a time building facility. The facility has a maximum security designation.

Programs available at BMSP include G.E.D., and Adult Basic Education for pennanently assigned inmates, an industrial cleaning vocational program for minimum security inmates. and a pre-release program. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility and community service projects.

Carter County Work Camp - Roan Mountain

Warden - Harold Smith Opened - 1986 Designated Capacity - 210 Averagc Daily Population - 205 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Carter County Work Camp (CCWC) is based on the concept of working inmates in the community. This facility houses minimwn security inmates who are within ten years of their release eligibility date (RED).

Programs at the facility include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education and a literacy program. Additionally, substance abuse programs are provided.

Inmatc work crews assist federal, state and local government agencies as well as private and non-profit organizations in community service programs. Community service projects, including renovation and painting for schools and other facilities, helps inmates develop skills in carpentry, masonry, landscaping and other related trades. Major construction projects have been completed during this report period.

33

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Chattanooga Community Service Center· Chattanooga

Warden - John Patterson Opened - 1970 Dwsignated Capacity - 120 Average Daily Population - Male - 97, Female - 19 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Chattanooga Community Service Center (CCSC) houses minimum security male and female offenders within seven years of release with an emphasis on community service.

Prognuns available at the facility include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, mental health programs, pre-release and individual counseling. The facility provides numerous state and local government agencies and community service agencies with skilled and unskilled labor, and inmates are also involved in support jobs at the facility.

Knoxville Community Service Center· Knoxville

Warden - Joe Fowler Opened - 1971 Designated Capacity - 150 Average Daily Population - 134 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Knoxville Community Service Center (KCSC) houses minimum security inmates who are within seven years of release with an emphasis on pre-release and community service. This facility does not accept sex offenders or offenders with detainers, and only accepts offenders with violent offenses who have been recommended for parole.

Programs available at KCSC include remedial reading, G.E.D., and Adult Basic Education on a voluntary basis, counseling and pre-release services, substance abuse education programs, alcoholics and narcotics anonymous groups, work and education release for eligible inmates, various religious activities, volunteer­sponsored activities such as birthday parties and seasonal celebrations, community service projects, organized recreational programming both on and off compound and basic mental health and self-help services.

Inmates are initiall y assigned to supervised supponjobs and self-help programs through the indi vidual program plan. Subsequently. inmates may progress to community service assignments, passes/furloughs and finally, to pre-release status and parole.

34

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility - Wartburg

Warden - David O. Mills Opened - 1980 Designated Capacity - 791 Average Daily Population -794 Security Designation - Medium/Minimwn Restricted Accredited - Yes

Adult Institutions

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility (MCRCF) is a time building institution with a current security designation of minimum restricted, which also housed medium custody imnates for approximately half the year.

Educational programs include O.E.D .. AdulL Basic Education, special education and college courses by Lee College and Roane State Community College.

Vocational c1asse'1'; include commercial cleaning, commercial food service, building trades. upholstery, vocational office education (VOE), and heating, air conditioning, and refrigeration.

Industries include textiles and furniture refurbishing/manufacturing. Uniform belts and gun sheaths for all TDOC institutions are handicrafled at the MCRCF leather shop. Highly skilled leather crafters also produce leather goods for sale to the public through the MCRCF craft shop.

Inmates from MCRCF have been responsible for major construction projects in Morgan and surrounding counties. These included building Mossy Grove Church, constructing bleachers at Central High School in Wartburg, remodelling the fellowship hall at Childs Memorial Church in Harriman, completing construction on Mill Creek Church. building an addition on Mt. Cannel Church in Coalfield, constructing boat docks and painting sheds at Roane County Park, building an addition to the athletic building at Rockwood High School, and building campsites at Frozen Head State Park, Wartburg.

Inmates also provided valuable services to local communities, such as highway and eounty right-of-way clearing, trash pickup, cemetery mowing and cleanup, grave digging. church mainterumce, sehoot yard work. and have helped civic groups with landscaping projects and various other maintenance projects with have saved taxpayer dollars. The art shop makes signs and other items for community organizations. The building trades class recently made a special desk for a handicapped child in Nashville enabling her to attend school. The Straight Talk Program is presented to various community organizations upon request to supplement local programs for delinquent adolescents.

35

F.1scal Year 1991 ~92 Annual Report

Northeast Correctional Cen!er - Mountain City

Warden - Howard Carlton Opened - 1991 Designaated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - 934 Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

Northeast Correctional Center (NECC) opened in March 1991. NECC is a time building institution with a security designation of close. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational courses include building rrades, electricity, graphic art/silk screening and data processing.

Industries at the institution include a print plant and a data plant that employ approximately 75 inmates.

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility - Pikeville

Warden - James Bowlen Opened - 1980 Designated Capacity - 782 Average Daily Population -795 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility (STSRCF) is a time building institution with a medium security designation.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Six different vocational programs include industrial sewing/upholstery, food service, heating and air conditioning, building trades, interior fInish, and barbering.

An industrial sewing plant is located at the facility. Inmates also work on the fann and at the sawmill.

Community services include a construction crew which perfonns a variety of services in the community for government and charitable organizations and three Department of Transportation work crews.

36

Adult Institutions

INMATES INCARCERATED OVER TEN YEARS FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

NUMBER PRIMARY OF OFFENSE OFFENDERS

FIRST DEGREE MURDER 291 SECOND DEGREE MURDER 156 AGGRA VATED RAPE 83 AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING 19 AGGRA VA TED ARSON 1 ATIEMPTED FIRST DEGREE MURDER 3 HABITUAL CRIMINAL 2

RAPE 83 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 90 AGGRAVATED SEXUAL BATTERY 5 AGGRA V A TED ASSAl)1., T 9 KIDNAPPING 1

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 12 BURGLARY . OTHER THAN HABITATION 9 THEFT OF PROPERTY ($1,000 . $10,000) 14 STATUTORY RAPE 1 THEFT OF PROPERTY ($500 - $1,000) 3 BURGLARY-AUTO 3 ATTEMPTED BURGLARY - OTHER THAN HABITATION 1

TOTAL OFFENDERS WITH 10 YEARS OR MORE CONTINUOUS SERVICE 786

37

AVERAGE TIME

SERVED (yy/MM)

15/06 14/02 12/00 13/02 11/10 17/07 13/04

16/00 14/08 12/05 13/05 27/10

14/07 14/07 14/01 10/11 12/01 14/01 12/10

14/08

----- -- --- ---- -------------

Middle Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Donal Campbell

DeBerry Correctional Institute Middle Tennessee Reception Center

Nashville Community Service Center Riverbend Maximum Security Institution

South Central Correctional Center Tennessee Prison For Women Tennessee State Penitentiary

Turney Center Industrial Prison

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility

DeBerry Correctional Institute· Nashville

Warden - David Russell, Acting Opened - 1977 Designated Capacity - 285 Average Daily Population - 223 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - No

Adult Institutions

DeBerry Correctional Institute (DCI) was closed in June 1992. DCI housed male and female offenders inneed of mental health intervention and treatment, irunates with behavior problems, and male inmates participating in the sex offender treatment program. The program and services at DCI were transferred to the new Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility in June 1992.

The facility has been transferred to the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County.

Middle Tennessee Reception Center· NashviUe

Warden - Jack Morgan Opened - 1979 Designated Capacity - 594 Average Daily Population - 583 Security Designation· Close Accredited· Yes

Middle Tennessee Reception Center (MlRC) is the reception, classification and diagnostic center for male felons committed from the Middle Tennessee area. The facility is designated as close security.

Educational programs available at the facility include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. A vocational program is available in ornamental horticulture, greenhouse operation and management. Irunatesare involved in support jobs at the facility.

41

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Nashville Community Service Center - Nashville

Warden - Jim Dickman Opened - 1936, Present Mission - 1970 Designated Capacity - 325 Average Daily Population - 315 Security Designation - Minimum Accredited - Yes

Nashville Community Service Center (NCSC) houses minimum security inmates within seven years of release with emphasis on community reintegration. NCSC is also designated as a pre-release center for inmates that have been recommended for parole and are within 90 days of release. Community volunteers assist in the pre­release programming and have implemented a program entitled "Going For The Gold" which supplements the existing pre-release program.

Academic programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education and literacy programs. Vocational programs include food service and building trades, offered through Branell College. Some inmates are eligible to • participate in community colleges and universities. Substance abuse programming is available. Minimum community custody inmates work in the community and pay room and board fees. Inmates also work for oilier state departments in jobs, such as custodians and cooks, for the Departments of Safety, General Services and Military. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility. Restitution progrmnrning is also available.

Community service projects include janitorial and maintenance work for churches, schools, and other charitable organizations and setting-up booths and clean-up for several local festivals. Inmates participate in community recreational leagues, e.g. softball, basketball. The "Don't Follow Me" program is an inmate organization that speaks to schools, civic organizations, community groups to deter substance abuse and criminal activities.

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution - NashviUe

Warden - Michael Dutton Opened - 1989 Designated Capacity - 574 Average Daily Population - 571 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) is a time building institution with a security designation of maximum. RMSI houses the state's Death Row inmate popUlation.

Educational programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include printing, commercial cleaning, woodworking, and data processin,1. Industries include data entry and printing/quick print. Death Row inmates participate in the data entry industry, educational programs, and support services. Other inmates are involved ill support jobs at the facility.

42

South Central Correctional Center - Clifton

Warden ~ John Ross Driskell Opened - March 1992 Designated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

Adult Institutions •

SouLh Ce/llral Correctional Center (SCCC) opened in March 1992. SCCC is a time building institution with a security designation of close. SCCC is managed by Corrections Corporation of America, a private corrections management fInn. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. An irunate tutor program has been established.

Vocational programs include building trades repair and maintenance, and computer operations.

Community service projects include construction of a sign and groundwork at Clifton Airport, reroofmg a school, litter pickup, and providing free fIrewood through the Clifton Senior Citizens Center.

Tennessee Prison for Women - Nashville

Warden - Penny Bemhardt Opened - 1898, Present Facility - 1966 (Female unit established 1906) Designated Capacity - 341 Average Daily Population - 343 Security Designation ~ Maximwn Accredited - Yes

Termessee Prison for Women (TPW) is the reception, classifIcation, diagnostic center and time building institution for state sentenced female felons. The security designation is maximum.

Academic pmgrams include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, special education and college courses offered Ihrough American Baptist College. Vocational programs include culinary arts, cosmetology, vocational office education. and building maintenance trades. Industries located at TPW are a unifonn plant and a customer service center. Eligible irunates may work in the community on work release, community beautification/clean up crew on 1-440 and in other state agencies. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Currently, the building previously used as the administration building is undergoing renovation which will house the medical unit, some administrative functions and expand the indoor visitation area.

43

'Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Tennessee State Penitentiary - Nashville

Warden - Alton Hesson, Acting Opened - 1898 Designated Capacity - 900 Average Daily Population - 491 Security Designation - Medimn Accredited - No

Tennessee State Penitentiary (TSP) closed in June 1992. TSP housed medium security inmates and inmates temporarily assigned for medical and court appearance reasons. TSP's central health care and pharmacy services transferred to the Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility upon the closing of the institution.

Turney Center Industrial Prison and Farm - Only

Warden - Jim Rose Opened - 1971 Designated Capacity - 728 Average Daily Population - 689 Security Designation- Clos(~ Accredited - Yes

Tumey Center (TC) is a time building institution with emphasis on industry. The security designation is close. The majority of beds are medium security.

Academic programs available at the facility include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. VocationaJ programs include cosmetology, cabinet making and mill work, industrial maintenance, landscaping, vocational office education and commercial food services. Industry programs are woodwork shop. metal plant. sign plant and paint plant. The fann operation includes raising crops for feeder cattle. TC also operates a sawmill which produces stakes for the Department of Transportation and other projects. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Inmate work crews completed numerous community service projects, some of which are the construction of a sidewalk through the Centerville City Park, construction of a bathroom at the Humphreys County Soil Conservation office, painting and repairing schools throughout Hickman County School System, constructing a playground at the Highland Rim Head Start School for the Humphreys County School System. painting and cleaning the Senior Citizen Building in Perry County, remodelling the Humphreys County Courthouse and constructing two pumping stations for the City of Centerville.

44

Adult Institutions

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility ~ Nashville

Warden - Christine J. Bradley Opened - June 1992 Designated Capacity - 562 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - No

The Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) opened in June 1992. DSNF is the central health and mental health care treatment and referral center for the department. Twenty-seven percent of the beds are for health care, 63 percent for mental health, and 10 percent for support workers. Thirty-two beds are designated for women. The Health Center provides a full range of specialty diagnostic and treatment services in support of the department. DSNF includes an intensive residential sex offender treatment program. The department's central pharmacy is located outside this facility.

NATURAL/ILLNESS 82"

INMA TE DEATHS TOOe INSTITUTIONS

FY 1991-92

HOMICIDE 11"

SUICIDE 7"

N = 28

45

:Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

18

16

N U 104

'" 8 E 12 R

0 10 f

I 8 N C

~ II E

~ 4 5

2

7

REPORTED ASSAULTS FY 1991-92

(TOTAL INMATE ON INMATE = 68 & TOTAL INMATE ON STAFF = 65)

5 6

7

o I~ATE ON STAFF

12 Itt.tATE ON Itt.tATE

AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC .IIoH

REPORTED ASSAULTS BY TYPE BY INMATES ON STAFF OR OTHER INMATES

FY 1991-92

STABBING 17

1J'I:

46

5

12

40

N 35 U M B 30

E R 25

0 F 20

Totol ~s = 109 Sean penmeter - 2

ESCAPES FROM ADULT INSTITUTIONS BY INSTITUTION

FY 1991-92

32

Adult Institutions

E 15+-----------~r~------------~h--------------------S C A 10+-~r_------~*------------~ r-------------------­p E S 5

N U M B E R

o F

E 5 C A P E 5

ESCAPES FROM ADULT INSTITUTIONS BY MONTH 199'1-92

14~--------------------~~------------------

'2~--------~~------~

10~~-------v r---~~~ r-----------V

8

6

2

JUL AJJG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ~

47

Fiscal Year t 991·92 Annual Report

ADULT INCIDENT SUMMARY

FY1991·92 FY 1990·91 IN<... .. IJ)ENT QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 TOTAL TOTAL

ACCIDENTAL INJURY

INMATE 21 :xl 34 22 97 149

srAFF 10 8 12 IS 45 62

VISITOR 2 0 I 4 13

ASSAUL T·lNMAlE ON INMA 1E

curIlNGf.)TABBlNG 2 4 2 8 16 25

AGIITJPHYSICAL ABUSE 18 10 5 14 47 66

AREARM 0 0 0 0 0 0

SEXUAL 0 0 0 I

0TIffiR WEAPON 2 0 4 5

ASSAULT·INMAlEONSTAFF

ClJITlNG/STABBlNG 0 0 0 I I

AGlITJPHYSlCAL ABUSE 16 15 16 12 59 50

AREARM 0 0 0 0 0 0

SEXUAL 0 0 0 0 0

OTI-JE{ WEAPON 2 0 1 2 5 5

ASSAULT·INMA lEON VISITOR 0 0 2 0

OCAlH

lNMA lE-nOMlCIDE 2 0 1 0 3 2

lNMAlE-NA 11JRAL 8 5 5 5 23 30

lNMAlBSmCIDE 0 0 2 4

INMA lE-0lHER 0 0 0 0 0 0

srAFF 1 4 1

VISITOR 0 0 0 0 0 0

ESCAPE

ATIEMPf 0 3 8

FAILURE TO RImJRN FROM

FURLOUGH 8 14 15 5 42 39

SECURESUFERVISION 0 0 0 2 2 5

WALKAWAY FROM MINIMUM

SECURITY 10 7 6 13 36 33

WORK DETAIL-MINIMUM 3 1 2 8 14 8

WORK PASS-MINIMUM 5 4 3 3 15 Zl

48

Adult Institutions

ADULT INCIDENT SUMMARY

FY1991·92 FY 1990·91 INCIDENT QUARTER 1 QUARThtt 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 TOTAL TOTAL

INMA'!E DEHA VlOR

DJS11JRBANCE 0 2 2 4 8 1

HOSTAGEsnuAnoN 0 0 0 0 0 0

RIOT 0 0 0 0 0 0

SELF-INFLICTED INJURY

SFLF MU1ILA nON/

SELF·1NFLlcrnD INJURY 13 11 4 7 35 88

SUICIDE A TlliMPI' 6 6 8 9 '19 41

INMAlE 1RANSfER

ADMINlSlRATIVE 7 7 9 6 '19 41

MEDICAL 2 3 0 5 10 50

USEOFFORCE

DISOIARGE OFFIREARM I 0 3 7

MACE 0 0 2 0

PHYSICAL RrS1RAINT 12 12 8 12 44 101

TASER 3 2 3 4 12 Zl

CJIHER

EMPLOYEE ARREST 4 12

lNMA1E ARRESI' 2 2 2 2 8 8

~nONSDJSRUPTION 36 42 28 42 148 125

fROffiR1Y DAMAGE 17 5 9 17 48 ff)

USE OF DOG 1EAM 11 15 5 7 38 51

USE OF lNMAlES IN

EMERGENCY 2 10 9 2 23 17

INMAlE ILLNESS 17 23 12 17 ff) 103

VISITOR ARRF.ST 1 0 2 4 7 7

01HIiR 25 15 17 21 78 138

1UTAL 267 250 228 TIS 1,020 1,421

49

I

West Tennessee Region

Regional Administrator· Billy McWherter

Fort Pillow Prison and Farm Lake County Regional Correctional Facility

Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center Northwest Correctional Center

Wayne County Boot Camp West Tennessee High Security Facility

i I

-----------------------------~- --

E

Fort I)illow Prison and Farm - Henning

Warden - Fred Raney Opened - 1938 Designated Capacity - 700 A verage Daily Population - 642 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Adult Institutions

Fort Pillow Prison and Farm (FP) is a time building institution W1Lh a security designation of medium. Producing agricultural products is one of the main functions of the facility.

Academic programs include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include masonry and building trades. The work emphasis is mainly agricultural. The facility also manufactures the motor vehicle plates for the state. Agriculture products include dairy, beef, field and truck crops, such as vegetables, com, soybeans, wheat, and timbel'. Inmates are involved ill support jobs at the facility.

Community service projects include construction of baseball fields and cleaning numerous cemeteries.

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility - Tiptonville

Warden - Robert Conley Opened - 1981 Designated Capacity - 715 Average Daily Population -710 Security Designation - Medium Accredited - Yes

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility (LCRCF) is a time building institution with special emphasis on education programs. The security designation is medium but changed to house minimum- restricted inmates during the year.

Educational programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, special education, and vocational education. Vocational training is offered in cabinet making and mill work; painting and interior finisb; electrical wiring; masonry; automotive mechanics; welding; barbering; conunercial food services; horticulture; plumbing; advanced building trades; and heating, air conditioning, and refrigeration. Postsecondary programs are also available to qualified offenders through the University of Tennessee at Martin. lP.mates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Conununity service projects included renovation and painting for schools and other local facilities and construction and renovation projects for other state departments.

53

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center - Memphis

Warden - Bruce MacDonald Opcned - 1974 Designated Capacity - 411 A verage Daily Population - 385 Security Designation - Close Accredited - Yes

Mark Luttrell Reception Center (MLRC) is the reception, classification, and diagnostic center for male felons committed from the West Terulessee area. The facility is designated as close security.

Educational programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, and college courses by Shelby State Community College. Burnell College provides vocational programs in airconditioning and refrigeration, and building trades. Christian Brothers University administers a pre-release program. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility.

Community service projects included adopting Corry Junior High through the Memphis "Adopt-A-SchooI" program; meeting with over 4,000 young people in over 1 00 sessions to hopefully deter youths from coming to prison; and state park clean-up.

Northwest Correctional Center· Tiptonville

Warden - Charles Noles Opened - May 1992 Designated Capacity - 960 Average Daily Population - N/A Security Designation - Close Accredited - No

Northwest Correctional Center (NWCq opened in May 1992. This time building facility has a security designation of close. The majority of beds are medium security.

E<hlcation programs include G.E.D., Adult Basic Education, and vocational training. Vocationru programs inClude two classes of building trades, small engines, electricity, and data processing.

54

Wayne County Boot Camp - CUfton

Warden - Malcolm Davis Opencd - 1985 (Convcrled to Bool Camp - 1989) Desigmlled Capacity - 150 Averagc Daily Population - 133 Security Designalion "- Medium Accredited - Yes

Adult Institutions £

In December 1989 Lhe Wayne County Work Camp was reorganized as a Special Alternative Incarceration Unit, conunollly referred to as Lhe "Boot Camp:' The boot camp program is a highly disciplined military style training program combined with various treatment programs. Eligible offenders are under 35 years of age. and convicted of non-violent crimes with sentences of 6 years or less (longer for most drug offenses). The program is operated a<; minimum security.

Military training consists of drill and ceremony. physical training. and respect for auLhority. Available treatment programs include Adult Basic Education. Horizons Plus program, self-esteem. substance abuse, and pre-release. Inmates are involved in support jobs at the facility. Inmates participate in the boot camp program between 90 and 120 days. Upon successfully completing Lhe program, inmates are released to probation supervision.

Community service projects included cleaning cemeteries and constructing school playground equipment.

West Tt~nnessee Higb Security Facility - Henning

Warden - Billy Compton Opened - 1990 Designated Capacity - 606 Average Daily Population - 600 Security Designation - Maximum Accredited - Yes

West Tennessee High Security Facility (WTHSF) opened in January 1990. The facility is a time building institution with a security designation of maximum.

Educational programs available include G.E.D. and Adult Basic Education. Vocational programs include sewing, woodworking, masonry, and upholstery. The facility includes textile and wood refurbishing plants.

55

Community Services Carey Rogers

Assistant Commissioner

Fjeld Servjces

The purpose of the field services section is to effectively supervise and investigate the conduct of persons placed 011 probation and referred to the department by the courts. Pre-sentence investiga­tions and evaluations arc provided to criminal and circuit courts. Other investigative reports include post-sentence, classification and interstate com· pact reports. The section also has the responsibil· ity of collection of criminal injuries compensa­tion, supervision and diversion fees from all eli­gible offenders. A Work Projects Program and an Intensive Supervision Progf'cU11 are administered by the section. In addition, the division operates specialized probation services for the Shelby County Criminal Court, Division X (Drug Court). An emphasis on identification and treatment for offenders for substance abuse related problems is the primary goal of this specialized unit.

The section is also responsible for screening eli­gible participants for the department' s boot camp

Community Services ,

program from the local jails and facilities. Upon completion of the boot camp program, the proba­tion staff is responsible for supervising the suc­cessfully released offender. During FY 1991-92, a total 350 offenders were successfully released to probation supervision.

The Field Services section supervised an average of 18.808 probationers in fiscal year 1991·92. Probation services are provided to all judicial districts in the state. A total of $1,576.496 was collected during the fiscal year for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Fund; $370,475 was col­lected in Pre-Trial Diversion fees. Over 219,000 hours of community service work were perfonned by 2323 probationers in the Work Projects Pro­gram.

The Intensive Supervision program supervised an average of 1,111 cases per month during the fiscal year and utilized both electronic monitoring and intennittent drug testing to provide intensifi.ed services. The cost of supervision for an offender in FY 1991·92 was $3.96.

ADULT PROBATION MONTHLY CASELOAD FY 1983 - FY 1992

20000

19000

18000

N

~ 17000 B E R 16000

o f 15000 C A S~.woo E s

13000

12000

13.581 12,500 --/'

/' 13,160

11.802

-./ ./ 14,422 -13,623

16,656 16,728 Y ./

_./ 16,609

15,862

- JI.JoIE 30 CASELOAD

... AVERAGE MONTHLY CASELOAD

19,433

l1ooo+-----~----~~----+_----~----_4------r_----~----_+----~ 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89

YEAR

59

89-90 90-91 91-92

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

6000

5000

N U

~ 4000 E R

03000 F

C ~ 2000 E S

1000

1400

1200

~1000 t.I 8 E R 800

0 F

600 C A S E 400 S

200

0

ADULT PROBATION MONTHLY CASE LOAD BY REGION

lSI JUNE 30 1992 CASELOAO= 18,808

o AVERAGE MONTHLY CASELOAD= 18,890

FY 1991-92

fllST TEIII

SOUTH If'PER SOUTH MID ct.t.I- NORTH EAST WoIlERLANl CENTRAL BERLANl WEST

SOUTH WEST

INTENSIVE SUPERVISION PROBATION CASELOAD FY 1991-92

124-2

1169 1201 1191 !.lAy 114-4- MAR APR

DEC JAN FEB

961 962 967 97

.AlL AUG SEP OCT

5085

DELTA

1245

o AVERAGE MONTHLY INTENSIVE PROBATION CASELOAO BY REGION

~ 1991-92 INTENSIVE PROBATION

368 ADMISSIONS 305 BY REGION

-INTENSIVE PROBATION CASELOAD BY t.tONTH

fRST TN EAST TN S. EAST S. carr. IoID-cLUI. N. WEST S. WEST DELTA

60

Community Services

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 ADULT PROBATION ACTIVITY

PROGRAM ACTIVITY

CASES REFERRED FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATIONS PRESENTENCE REPORTS COMPLETED POSTSENTENCE REPORTS COMPLETED DIVERSION REPORTS COMPLETED INTERSTATE COMPACT REPORTS COMPLETED SPECIFIC DATA REPORTS COMPLETED CLASSIFICATION REPORTS COMPLETED

FORMAL COURT APPEARANCES ON PROBATION MA TIERS HOME CONTACTS WITH PROBATIONER OR FAMILY EMPLOYER CONTACTS TENNESSEE PROBATIONERS UNEMPLOYED CONTACTS WITH POUCE AGENCIES REFERRALS TO OTHER SERVICE AGENCIES

CONTACTS WITH OTHER SERVICS AGENCIES PROBATIONERS REVOKED VIOLATION REPORTS COMPLETED TENNESSEE PROBATIONERS UNDER SUPERVISION ISC CASES UNDER SUPERVISION

DIVERSION CASES lINDER SUPERVISION CASES UNDER SUPERVISION (END OF YEAR) PROBATIONERS REFERRED FOR WORK PROJECTS PROBATIONERS PARTICIPATING IN WORK PROJECTS NUMBER OF COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS COMPLETED

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY

HOURS IN TRAINING ACTIVITIES MILES TRAVELED ON JOB

FEE COLLECTION ACTIVITY

NUMBER OF TENNESSEE PROBATION CASES NUMBER OF EUGffiLE CASES NUMBER VIOLATED FOR NON-PAYMENT NUMBER CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF CASES CURRENT NUMBER REVOKED

FEES COLLECTED CRIMINAL INJURIES SUPERVISION PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION

TOTAL FEES

DRUG TESTING ACTIVITY

NUMBER OF DRUG SCREENS (FIELD) NUMBER OF DRUG TESTS (LAB ORA TORy) NUMBER OF POSmVE DRUG TESTS

... MONTHLY AVERAGES

61

NUMB@:]

7.574 6,583 4.083

388 3,105 3,319 2,382

18,050 14,898 18.974 5,970 ...

38.512 12.154

11,987 1,867 7,936

16,260 ... 1,930 ...

30 ... 18,890 ... 2.313

IS.385 ... 219.321

12.901 637,487

18.890 ... 10,060 ... 1.690 6,450

64 1.345

$1.072,602 370,475 133,419

$1,576,496

4,424 854 774

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 INTENSIVE PROBATION ACfIVIlY

PR(X;RAM ACI1Vf1Y

NUMBEROFNEW ADMISSIONS NUMBER OF CASES SUPE'RVISFD NUMBERSUCCESSFULL Y TRANSFERRED TO RE'GULARPROBATION NUMBERSUCCESSFUlL YDISGIARGFD NUMBFROFCASESREVOKFD PERCENTAGE OF CASES REVOKED NUMBER OF VIOLATION REroRTSCOMPLEfID NUMBEROFPERSONAL CONTACTS NUMBEROFSERVICEAGENCYCONTACIS NUMBER OFSERVICE AGENCY RE'fERRALS NUMBEROFCOMMUNITY SFRVICE HOURS COMPLETED

Fl.'ECOLLECTION ACfIVTlY

FEES mLl...ECTE'D CRIMINAL INJURIES SUPERVISION TOTAL FEES

DRUGTESnNGAcnvnv

NUMBER OF DRUG SCREENS (FlElD) NUMBER OF DRUG TESTS (lABORATORy) NUMBEROFDRUG~PAIDBYO~FR

NUMBER OFPOSITIVE DRUG TESTS

*-MON'IHLY AVERAGE

62

NUMBER I

1,036 1,245 * 3~

138 361 2)

1,048 57,363 2,540 2,811

24,378

$53,289 2fJ,5ti7

$73,8'36

3,D21 sro 133 441

Communjty Correctjons

The Community COlTections Section is responsible for overseeing the grant program for the delivery of community corrections services. Community Cor­rections progrmns are intended as an altemative to incarceration for offenders. The FY 1991-92 appro­priation was $5.1 million. Grants wentlo 16 continu­ation progrmns and two new progrmns. A 26 percent

Community Services ,

increase in progrrun admissions (1,239 to 1,557) occurred. The programs serve 93 counties including all four metropolitan areas. At the end of the fiscal year, 2,061 felony offenders were underConununity Correction §upcrvision. Many of the grantees use electronic monitoring de­vices to aid in enforcing house arrest compo­nents, and three grantees operate residential centers for offenders. Cost per offender per day declined by $1.03 from the previous year.

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS fY 1986-87 THROUGH FY 1991-92

1600

1400 OCOCAIt£

• OTHER DRUGS

1200 0 OTHER ADMISSIONS

1000 N U t.f800 B E R

200

FY 1986-87 FY 1987-88 FY 19&9-90 FY 11190-91 FY 1991-112

63

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annl~.R_e .. p_o.r.t _____________ _

SUMMARY OF 1991-92 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ACTIVITY

c PROGRAM DATA

PROGRAMS COUNTIES SERVED JUDICIAL DISlRICfS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CASES COST PER OFFENDER DAY ANNUAL COST PER OFFENDER

PROGRAM ACi1VITY

OFFENDERS ACCEPIED SUCCESSFUL TERMINATIONS UNSUCCESSFUL TERMINATIONS YEAREND CENSUS

OFFENDER Acnvrrv

HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE WORK PERfORMED RESTITUTION PAID WAGES/SALARY EARNED CHILD SUPPORT PAID FINES PAID COURT COSTS PAID SUPERVISION FEES PAll')

OFFENDER SERVICES DEUVERED

HOURS OFGED/EDUCATIONAL 1RAINING HOURS OF VOCATIONAL 'IRAINING SCREENS FUR SUBSTANCE ABUSE INPATIENT ALCOHOL TREATMENT (DAYS) INPATIENT DRUG 'IREATMENT (DAYS) RESIDENfIAL TREATMENI' (DAYS)

64

NUMBI!..'R

16 93 30

1,879 $6.61

$2,413

1.557 826 532

2,021

100.568 $199.970

$7,469941 $120,352 $146,715 $287,621 $67,408

12,070 4,440 6,071 2980 3,469 9,392

DRUG

THEn

B~GLARY

PROB. VIO.

Community Services t

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY OFFENSE CATEGORY

FY 1991-92 511

(33%)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ OTHER f ~~~~~

E A TTEt.lPTS N

~ "'TR. VEH. _t-L-"-""-'

SEX

ROBBERY

ASSAULTS

HOt.IICIDES

o 100

M+

4S-4Q

4O-U

A 3lI-JII

G E 30-34

~28

21-24

18-20

0 100

200 300 tUlBER

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY AGE

200

NUMBER OF OFFENDERS

65

500 600

J7~ (24lC)

JOO

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADMISSIONS BY SEX AND RACE FY 1991-92

SEX

66

BLACK 34:11:

RACE

OTHER 0.1:11:

LOCALJAD...CENSUS

FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

Jill..y AUOUSf SEPIFMBER OCfOBER IDVEMBER DECl!MBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARQI AffilL MAY JUNE

1UfALJAlLroI'ULATIOO 12,624 12,803 12,888 13liSO 13,658 12,957 13,175 13,454 13,584 13.368 13,347 12.666 lDOCFELONS 1,961 1,935 1.889 ,,, ......

.i:I"<V 1919 2,046 2.117 2,213 2,339 2,182 1,992 1.9S7 LOCALFELONS 2,564 2,520 2,621 2,621 2,729 2.i36 2.641 2,661 2.663 2,600 2.676 2.626 ornER CONVICfEDFELONS 1,102 1,134 1,132 lJ09 1.173 1.139 1227 1,271 1.273 1.313 1,686 l,1OS CONVICIFJ) MISDEMFANANrS 3.052 3,OSO 3.088 2977 3,167 3P92 3,101 3,139 3,200 3,241 3.029 3,011 ornER 279 236 285 298 341 294 265 285 308 271 262 271 PRE-1RIALDEfAINEES

FELONY 2.819 3,023 3.029 3,313 3.086 2939 3.021 3,008 2,967 3.002 2.920 2871 0\ MISDEMFANANl' 847 !ITS 844 741 894 711 783 877 834 759 782 822 -...J

ffiRrnNTAGE OFJAlLroPUlATION

fELONS 35.S% 34.8% 35.0% 33.4% 34.0% 36.9% 36.1% 361% 36.8% 35.8% 35.0% 362% lDOC 155% 15.1% 14.7% 141% 14.1% 15.8% 16.1% 16.4% 172% 163% 14.9% I:'iS%

LOCAL 203% 19.7% 203% 191% 20.0% 21.1% 20.0% 19.5% 19.6% 19.4% 20.0% 20.7% ffiE·1RIALDEfAINEES 29.0% 30.4% 30.1% 29.7% 29.1% 282% 2S.9% 289% 28.9% 28.1% 27.7% 29.2%

FELONY 223% 23.6% :-'3.5% 243% 226% 22.7% 22.9% 224% 224% 21.S% 21.9% 22.7% I~ MISDEMEANANf 6.7% 6.8% 6,5% 5.4% 65% 55% 5.9% 65% 6.1% 5.7% 59% 6.5%

:3 = :I _. -~ 00 ~ .., <: _. n ~ t:fJ

Systemwide Statistics

RETLfiNED ESCAPEES a: OTHERS

NEW eot.uTS

I.HCNOWN

40+

J5-JlI

.30-34

25-29

20-24

<20

0

IX

o 1000

4"

500

2000

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY TYPE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

3000 4000

NUMBER

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY AGE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

12X 12X

12X 12S

2a.

24"

211" 2""

1000 1500

71

Systemwide Statistics ?

~ LOCAL

~ TDOC

o SYSTEMWIDE

71"

5000 l1OOO

C LOCAL

I?JTDOC

o SYSTENWIDE

24X

2""

2000 2500

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION BY JURISDICTION

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 TDOC LOCAL TOTAL

COUNTY NUMBER I PERCENT NUMBER I PERCENT NUMBER IPERCENT

ANDERSON 73 1.2 3 0.1 76 0.8 BEDFORD 57 0.9 15 0.5 72 0.8 BENTON 19 0.3 2 0.1 21 0.2 BLEDSOE 10 0.2 0 0.0 10 0.1 BLOUNT 60 0.9 4 0.1 64 0.7 BRADLEY 88 1.4 1 0.0 89 1.0 CAMPBELL 24 0.4 2 0.1 26 0.3 CANNON 15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 CARROLL 35 0.6 0 0.0 35 0.4 CARTER 41 0.6 3 0.1 44 0.5 CHEATHAM 21 0.3 18 0.6 39 0.4 CHESTER 15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 CLAIBORNE 13 0.2 0 0.0 13 0.1 CLAY 11 0.2 5 0.2 16 0.2 COCKE 49 0.8 10 0.3 59 0.6 COFFEE 51 0.8 8 0.3 59 0.6 CROCKETT 27 0.4 1 0.0 28 0.3 CUMBERLAND 28 0.4 1 0.0 29 0.3 DAVIDSON 548 8.7 526 18.2 1,074 11.7 DECATUR 8 0.1 1 0.0 9 0.1 DEKALB 16 0.3 4 0.1 20 0.2 DICKSON 27 0.4 1 0.0 28 0.3 DYER 70 1.1 11 0.4 81 0.9 FAYETTE 70 1.1 5 0.2 75 0.8 FENTRESS 18 0.3 0 0.0 lu 0.2 FRANKLIN 26 0.4 0 0.0 26 0.3 GIBSON 67 1.1 1 0.0 68 0.7 GILES 33 0.5 2 0.1 35 0.4 GRAINGER 12 0.2 6 0.2 18 0.2 GREENE 82 1.3 28 1.0 110 1.2 GRUNDY 10 0.2 0 0.0 10 0.1 HAMBLEN 75 1.2 50 1.7 125 1.4 HAMILTON 580 9.2 11 0.4 591 6.4 HANCOCK 6 0.1 3 0.1 9 0.1 HARDEMAN 34 0.5 5 0.2 39 0.4 HARDIN 39 0.6 0 0.0 39 0.4 HAWKINS 51 0.8 10 0.3 61 0.7 HAYWOOD 30 0.5 0 0.0 30 0.3 HENDERSON 26 0.4 2 0.1 28 0.3 HENRY 36 0.6 1 0.0 37 0.4 HICKMAN 21 0.3 3 0.1 24 0.3 HOUSTON 5 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.1 HUMPHREYS 15 0.2 2 0.1 17 0.2 JACKSON 11 0.2 0 0.0 11 0.1 JEFFERSON 29 0.5 3 O.! I 32 0.3 JOHNSON 12 0.2 0 O.C' 12 0.1 KNOX 335 5.3 7 0.21 342 3.7 LAKE 9 0.1 2 0.1 11 0.1

72

-------------- ----------

COUNTY

LAUDERDALE LAWRENCE LEWIS LINCOLN LOUDON MACON MADISON MARION MARSHALL MAURY MCMINN MCNAIRY MEIGS MONROE MONTGOMERY MOORE MORGAN OBION OVERTON PERRY PICKETT POLK PUTNAM RHEA ROANE ROBERTSON RUTHERFORD SCOTT SEQUATCHIE SEVlER SHELBY SMITH STEWART SULLIVAN SUMNER TIPTON TROUSDALE UNICOI UNION VAN BUREN WARREN WASHINGTON WAYNE WEAKLEY WHITE WILLIAMSON WILSON

TOTAL

Systemwide Statistics 2

ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY OF CONVICTION BY JURISDICTION

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 TDOC LOCAL TOTAL

NUMBER 1 PERCENT NUMBER 1 PERCENT NUMBER 1 PERCENT

46 0.7 4 0.1 50 0.5 27 0.4 4 0.1 31 0.3 16 0.3 3 0.1 19 0.2 35 0.6 7 0.2 42 0.5 18 0.3 1 0.0 19 0.2 17 0.3 0 0.0 17 0.2

126 2.0 2 0.1 128 1.4 29 0.5 1 0.0 30 0.3 58 0.9 1 0.0 59 0.6 64 1.0 6 0.2 70 0.8 38 0.6 1 0.0 39 0.4 8 0.1 3 0.1 11 0.1 7 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.1

41 0.6 2 0.1 43 0.5 54 0.9 13 0.5 67 0.7

1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 8 0.1 0 0.0 8 0.1

43 0.7 7 0.2 50 0.5 8 0.1 1 0.0 9 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.0

15 0.2 0 0.0 15 0.2 39 0.6 7 0.2 46 0.5 14 0.2 2 0.1 16 0.2 19 0.3 0 0.0 19 0.2 34 0.5 9 0.3 43 0.5

157 2.5 50 1.7 207 2.2 9 0.1 0 0.0 9 0.1 4 0.1 0 0.0 4 0.0

45 0.7 22 0.8 67 0.7 1.643 26.0 1.9~3 67.0 3.576 38.8

5 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.1 5 0.1 0 0.0 5 0.1

223 3.5 7 0.2 230 2.5 96 1.5 12 0.4 108 1.2 38 0.6 0 0.0 38 0.4 12 0.2 0 0.0 12 0.1 16 0.3 2 0.1 18 0.2 7 0.1 0 0.0 7 0.1 4 0.1 0 0.0 4 0.0

18 0.3 6 0.2 24 0.3 100 1.6 3 0.1 103 1.1

5 0.1 1 0.0 6 0.1 35 0.6 1 0.0 36 0.4 15 0.2 1 0.0 16 0.2

125 2.0 9 0.3 134 1.5 61 1.0 5 0.2 66 0.7

63291 100 28841 100 92131 100

73

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

5500

5000

4500

4000

N 3500

U3QOO M B 2500 E R2000

1500

1000

500

0

l1OOO

7000

N U &000 M B E 4000 R

2000

1000

o

42X

QJll

4B~

WHITE

0'" ~

~ ~~~

Wh: WALE

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY RACE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

0-

57';

51"

BLACK

RACE

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY SEX FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

gJX

7X

I

74

o SYSTEMWIDE

~TDOC

ISd LOCAL

OTHER

o SYSTEMWIDE

~ rooc !Sa LOCAL

7X 7X

1~

Systemwide Statistics

FELONY ADMISSIONS BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

PRIMARY %OF LOCALLY

OFFENSE IDoe SENTENCED

GROUP IDOC TOTAL FELONS

HABITUAL OFFENDER I 0.0% 0

HOMICIDE 525 8.3% 71

MURDER 1 98 1.5% 0

MURDER 2 228 3.6% 1

OTIiER HOMICIDE 199 3.1% 70

KIDNAPPING 43 0.7% 3

SEX OJ-oT-ENSES 355 5.6% 96

RAPE 83 1.3% 6

AGGRAV A'lED RAPE 101 1.6% 1

AGGRA VA 'lED SEXUAL BAT1ERY 80 1.3% 7

OTHER SEX OFFENSES 91 1.4% 82

ROBBERY 852 13.5% 252

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 530 8.4% 10

ROBBERY 251 4.0% 180

OTHER ROBBERY 71 1.1% 62

BURGLARY 1287 20.3% 625

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 713 11.3% 233

BURGLARY - OTHER THAN HABITATION 502 7.9% 262

OTHER BURGLARY 72 1.1% 130

THEFT' AND STOLEN PROPERTY 597 9.4% 412

THEFT OF PROPERTY $10.000-$60,000 103 1.6% 76

THEFT OF PROPERTY $1,000-$10,000 358 5.7% 203

THEFT OF PROPERTY $500-$1,000 115 1.8% 125

OTHER THEFr AND STOLEN PROPERTY 21 0.3% 8

FORGERY FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 220 3.5% 105

ASSAULT 442 7.0% 314

AGGRA VA 'lED ASSAULT 361 5.7% 234

OTHER ASSAULT 81 1.3% 80

ARSON 57 0.9% 16

DRUG OFFENSES 1714 27.1% 878

COCAINE OFFENSES 1,250 19.8% 214

OTHER DRUG OFFENSES 464 7.3% 664

E..o;;CAPE (JAIL OR PRISON) 38 0.6% 9

ALL OTHERS 198 3.1% 103

TOTAL 6.329 100.00/0 2.884

75

%OF %OF

LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

0.0% 1 0.0%

2.5% 596 6.5%

0.0% 98 1.1%

0.0% 229 2.5%

2.4% 269 2.9%

0.1% 46 0.5%

3.3% 451 4.9%

0.2% 89 1.0%

0.0% 102 1.1%

0.2% 87 0.9%

2.8% 173 1.9%

8.7% 1 104 12.0%

0.3% 540 5.9%

6.2% 431 4.7%

2.1% 133 1.4%

21.7% 1912 20.8%

8.1% 946 10.3%

9.1% 764 8.3%

4.5% 202 2.2%

14.3% 1009 11.00/0

2.6% 179 1.9%

7.0% 561 6.1%

4.3% 240 2.6%

0.3% 29 0.3%

3.6% ~~25 3.5%

10.9% 756 8.2%

8.1% 595 6.5%

2.8% 161 1.7%

0.6% 73 0.8%

30.4% 2592 28.1%

7.4% 1.464 15.9%

23.0% 1,128 12.2%

0.3% 47 0.5%

3.6% 301 3.3%

100.00/" 9.213 100.0%

~--- ------------------------------

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

FELONY ADMISSIONS - AVERAGE TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTII BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP

FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

TDOC LOCALLY SENTENCED

PRIMARY NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE

OFFENSE OF SENTENCE OF SENTENCE GROUP OFFENDERS (YY/MM) OFFENDERS (YYIMM)

HABITUAL OFFENDER 1 45JtJO 0 OOmo

DEATH ROW 13 N.A. N.A. N.A.

HOMICIDE 512 22/07 71 3/11 MURDER 1 85 45ft)2 0 OOftJO MURDER 2 228 24ftJ4 1 22/00 OTIIER HOMICIDE 199 11/00 70 3/08

KIDNAPPING 43 21101 3 4iU4

SEX OFFENSES 355 14/02 96 4ft) 1 RAPE 83 11/08 6 7/04 AGGRAVATED RAPE 101 28ft)2 1 20/00 AGGRAVATED SEXUAL BATTERY 80 9/04 7 7/07 OTHER SEX OFFENSES 91 5ftJ4 82 3/05

ROBBERY 852 13JtJ2 252 4/10 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 530 15/01 10 11/01 ROBBERY 251 8/06 180 5/00 OTHER ROBBERY 71 16/00 62 3m

BURGLARY 1287 6/07 625 3/05 AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 713 7/10 233 4/07 BURGLARY-OTHER TIIAN HABITATION 502 5/05 262 2/11 OTHER BURGLARY 72 2/10 130 2/00

TIIEFT AND STOLEN PROPERTY 597 5/00 412 2ft)7

THEFf OF PROPERTY S10,OOO-$60,OOO 103 5/10 76 4/01 TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $1,000-$10,000 358 5/06 203 2/10 TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $500-$1,000 115 3/01 125 1/06 OTHER TIIEFT AND STOLEN PROPERTY 21 2/08 8 1/04

FORGERY FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 220 4/00 105 2/05

ASSAULT 442 6ft)8 314 3/06 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 361 7ftJ4 234 4/01 OTIIER ASSAULT 81 3/10 80 1/08

ARSON 57 8iU4 16 2/11

DRUG OFFENSES 1714 7/06 878 3nI COCAINE OFFENSES 1,250 8/05 214 6/01 OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES 464 5/02 664 3/01

ESCAPE (JAIL OR PRlSONl 38 5JtJ7 9 2JtJ6

ALL OTIIERS 189 2/10 96 1/08

UNPROCESS;ED NEW COMMITS 9 N.A. 7 N.A.

TOTAL 6,329 9/03 2,884 3/06

SYSTEMWIDE

NUMBER AVERAGE

OF SENTENCE OFFENDERS (YY/MM)

1 45ftJO

13 N.A.

583 20JtJ5 85 45/02

229 24/04 269 9/01

46 19/08

451 Iml

89 11/05 102 28/01 87 9/02

173 4ft)5

1 104 11JtJ4 540 15/00 431 7/00 133 1OftJ4

1 912 5/07 946 7/00 764 4/06 202 2/04

1009 4/00 179 5/01 561 4/06 240 2/04

29 2/04

325 3/06

756 5ft)5

595 6/01 161 2/10

73 7ft)1

2592 6iU4 1,464 8/00 1,128 4/00

47 4/11

285 2ft)5

16 N.A.

9,213 7/05

NOTE - UPESBNTENCBS CALCULATED AT 45 YEARS. DBA TH & UNPROCESSED SENTENCES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN AVERAGES.

76

Systemwide Statistics

ADMISSIONS BY TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTH FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

NUMBER OF TOTAL SENTENCE OFFENDERS PERCENT

1 YEAR 659 7.2% >1- 2 YEARS 1183 12.8% >2- 3 YEARS 1735 18.8% >3 - 4 YEARS 788 8.6% >4~ 5 YEARS 543 5.9% >5 - 6YEARS 606 6.6% >6-lOYEARS 2118 23.0% >10 - 15 YEARS 774 8.4% > 15 - 20 YEARS 324 3.5% >20YEARS 383 4.2% LIFE SENlENCES 86 0.9% DEATH SENlENCES 13 0.1% UNPROCESSED SENTENCES 1 0.0%

TOTAL 9213 100.0%

NOTE - >20 YEARS CATEGORY EXCLUDES LIFE AND DEATH SENTENCES. FIGURES INCLUDE ALL ADMISSIONS TO INCARCERATION: NEW COMMITMENTS, PAROLE VIOLATORS, AND OTHERS.

77

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

ltIKNOWN

40+

35-30

30-34

25-29

20-24

<20

r: ~]I:I

12:1 JOOOj 14:1

'>'////h

12:1 ~ 131: '>'/h

19:1 ~V'>tY'tl 1!IX

Y/.-I'

..t'V\/\/VVVV\, 2a:I '>'//////////.

25:1

~92:1 S

o

~

211:1

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY AGE JUNE 3D, 1992

22:1 1 !IX

17:1 1~:I

~1"

21:1

111:1

1000 2000

I • LOCAL FELONS

III TDOC BACKUP

r:iI TDOC

o SYSTEMWIDE

~

300D

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY RACE JUNE 3D, 1992

SYSTEMWIDE ,lI:

TOOC BACKUP 3lI

47l1:

4711

BLACK ~

WHITE CJ OTHER _

78

47l1:

TOOC INHOUSE ,lI:

LOCAL FELONS :zx

OT/UALE

OT/FDLf,LE

R A WH/NALE C E / ~WH/FDLf,\.E X

BL/NALE

BL/FDLf,LE

Systemwide Statistics p

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY SEX

JUNE 30, 1992

SYSTEMWIDE 4X

118l1;

rooc BACKUP ex

2X 4"

bJi: os ox ox !Ill:

xn I)()()('\{)()(' 42lC

MALE 0 FEMALE.

moe INHOUSE 4%

all%

LOCAL FELONS 8%

FE/..ONY INMATE POPULATION BY RACE/SEX JUNE 3D, 1992

• LOCAL FELONS

C rooc BACI<lJ>

~ rooc INHOUSE

o SYSTEMWIDE

/////////////////// / !l2X

1%

~2X2X ~48" /// ///

~H o 1000

811"

/ / / / / / / / / / / 41X

2000 <4000

NUMBER

79

""

47X

7000 15000

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

FELONY INMATE POPULATION BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP JUNE 30,1992

rnIMARY %OF %OF LOCALLY

OFFENSE 'IlX1C INHOUSE TOOC BACKUP SENTENCED

GROUP INHOUSE" TOTAL BACKUP TarAL FELONS

" HABnuAL OFFENDER 235 2.4,% 0 0.0% 0

~

HOMlaDE 2,388 24.3% 95 4.8% 100

MURDER 1 971 9.9% 8 0.4% 0

MURDER 2 1,141 11.6% 36 1.9% 0

OlllER HOMICIDE 276 2.8% 51 2.6% 100

KIDNAPPING 242 2.5% 12 0.6% 6

SEX OFFENSES 1992 20.2% 126 6.4% 150

RAm 497 5.1% 36 1.9% 24

AGGRAVATED RAm 948 9.6% 23 1.1% 1

AGGRAVATEDSEXUALBATIERY 417 4.2% 35 1.8% 19

CYl'HER SEX OfFENSES 130 13% 32 1.7% 106

ROBBERY 1760 17.9% 246 12.6% 248

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 1,416 14.4% 161 83% 17

ROBBERY 256 2.6% 75 3.8% 191

OTHER ROBBERY 88 0.9% 10 05% 40

BURGlARY 1.040 10.61T, 395 20.'l1T, 507

AGGRAVATED DURGI..ARY 707 72.% 234 12.0% 240

BURGLARY -OTHER TIIAN HABITATION 313 3.2% 140 7.1% 199

(YI1IERBURGLARY 20 02.% 21 1.1% 68

THEFr AND STOLEN PROPERTY 345 35% 199 10.2% 335

TIIEFf OF PROPERTY $10,000-$60,000 57 0.6% 35 1.8% 74

TIIEFf OF PROPERIY S1,oo0-51 0.000 237 2.4% 123 63% 183

TIIEFT OF PROPERTY $500·S1,OOO 37 0.4% 37 1.9% 75

OlllER TIIEFf AND STOLEN PROffiRTY 14 0.1% 4 02.% 3

RlRGERY,FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT 91 0.9% 72 3.7% 72

ASSAULT 677 6.9% 139 7.1% 340

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 648 6.6% 117 6.0% 315

OlHERASSAULT 29 03% 22 !.l% 25

ARSON 74 0.8% 20 1.0% 14

DRUG' 908 9.21T, 583 29.81T, 772

COCAINE OFFENSES 654 6.6% 451 23.1% 266

OlHER DRUG OFFENSES 254 2.6% 132 6.7% 506

ESCAPE OAIL OR PRISON) 26 03% 13 0.7% 12

AILCYI'HERS 65 0.71T, 57 2.9% 70

TOTAL 9,843 100.0% 1,957 100.0% 2,626

80

%OF %OF

LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM

TarAL TarAL TOTAL

0.0% 235 1.6%

3.8% 2583 17.9%

0.0% 978 6.8%

0.0% 1,177 8.2%

3.8% 426 3.0%

0.2% 259 1.8%

5.7% 2269 15.7%

0.9% 557 3.9%

0.0% 972 6.7%

0.7% 472 3.3%

4.0% 268 1.9%

9.4% 2254 15.6%

0.7% 1,595 11.1%

73% 521 3.6%

15% 137 1.0%

19.31T, L942 13.59'<

92.% 1,181 82.%

7.6% 652 45%

2.6% 108 0.7%

12.7% 879 6.1%

2.8% 166 1.1%

7JJ% 543 3.8%

2.8% 149 1.0%

0.1% 21 0.1%

2.8% 235 1.6%

13.0% 1157 8.0%

12.0% 1,080 75%

1.0% 76 05%

05% 108 0.7%

29.41T, 2.263 15.7'!!:

10.2% 1,371 95%

193% 891 6.2%

0.4% 50 0.3%

2.71T, 19' 1.3%

100.0% 14,426 100.0%

-----~--------------------------

Systemwide Statistics o

PRlMARY

aTENSE

GROUP

HABITUAL OFFE.lIIDER

OOAllIROW

HOMICIDE

MURDER 1

MURI:eR2

0I1:IBR HOMICIDE

KIDNAPPlNG

SEX OFFIlNSES

RAPE

AGGRAVATED RAPE

AGORA VATEDSEXUAL BATIERY

Of HER SEX Of'!'Flo.ISES

ROBBERY

AOORAVATEDROBBERY

ROBBERY

OI'HER ROBBERY

BURGLARY

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY

BURGLARY.anmR TIiANHABITAl10N

OI'HER BURGLARY

THEFf AND STOLEN PROPERTY

1HEFT OF PROPERTYS10,OQO.$6O,OOO

1HEFT OFPROPERTYSI~IO.OOO

1HEFT OF PROPERTY $500$1,000

0l1l1!R 'J'HFFI' M'DSTOU!N PROPERTY

FELONYlNMA1EPOPULAl1ON·AVERAGETOTALSE"'1'ENCELENGTH BY PRlMARY OFFENSE GROUP

JUNE 30,1992

~INHOUSE ~BACKUP LOCALLY SENTENCED

NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE

CF SENTENCE OF SENTENCE (F SENTENCE

OFFENDERS (Yl~'MM) OFFENDERS CYY/MM) 0FFIlNDERS CYYlMM)

235 45/00 0 00/00 0 00/00

100 NA. 2 NA NA NA.

2.288 38/02 93 16/00 100 4104

871 5'}JOO 6 45/04 0 00/00

1,141 33105 36 21/05 0 00/00

276 14104 51 8/04 100 4/04

242 35/01 12 15/10 6 ,!I('()

1.992 26/02 126 11107 ISO 5/01

497 2'}JOO 36 12/04 24 6/04

948 36tIJ1 23 25/04 1 15/00

417 14/00 35 8,u6 19 6/10

130 9,(l1 32 4/10 106 ~

1760 2MIl. 246 13/02 248 5110

1,416 26111 161 IS,m 17 10/11

2S6 I'}JOO 75 9m 191 SIll 88 mJ8 10 12Jff1 40 3101

1,D40_ lWI 395 6107 !fIJI 4J02

7f11 13/11 234 7m 240 SJQ4

313 9/11 140 5/04 199 3JQ6

20 5/11 21 3/05 68 7!05

345 9/00 199 4/11 335 3/0<1

~ 8m 3S 6/06 74 ~

237 9/06 123 5/04 183 3/05 ~ 6/10 'rl 2P> 75 ml 14 8,us 4 mo 3 VJO

FORGERY.FRAUD AND EMBEZZl.8ME.NT 91 900 72. 3/ll 72. 2106

ASSAULT fiT] 13Kl1 139 6106 340 4104

AGORA VATEDASSAULT 648 13,Q4 117 7/01 315 4tI)6

OI1:IBRASSAULT 2) s.w 22 3/05 25 mo

ARSON 74 1~5 20 6/10 14 5106

mUG OFFENSES 9(ll llKl4 583 7106 772 4110

COCAINE OFfENSES 654 1006 451 sm 266 7/00

0l1l1!R DRUG OI'FENSES 254 13m 132 5/02 506 3/f!7

ESCAPe (JAIL OR PRISON) 26 10m 13 5/04 12 4104

AlLarHERS 65 9,(lS ~ 3m 70 1/06

TOTAL 9$43 24(CJ'I l~m S/OI 2,626 4/OS

SYS'~MWIDE

NUMBER AVERAGE

(F SENTENCE

OFFENDERS raLMML

235 45/00

102 NA

2,481 35/07

877 51/11

1,177 32/10

427 lJP2

260 33/01

2.268 23/08

557 2®S m 35/07

471 13101

268 6,us

2~54 2Q'1I

1.594 24111

522 9{¥>

138 16If17

1942 9.00

1,181 1~

652 6nI

109 3,()4

879 5111

166 6,()4

543 6/06

149 3/04

21 5/11

235 S,Ot

1156 9A'lS

1,080 1(\'00

76 4/10

1(8 11/05_

2.263 8m

1,371 SIll

892 6,01

51 7m

192 4.w

14,426 18/01

NarE.lJFBSENTENCESARBCALCUlATEDAT45 YEARS. D!!ATH & UNPROCESSEDS8N1ENCES ARBNOflNCLUDBD IN AVERAGES.

81

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

OTHER

FELONY RELEASES BY TYPE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

27.7'"

• LOCAL

~ BACKUP

~ INHOUSE

o SYSTEMWIDE T Y P E

~----------------------~

SENTENCE EXPIRATION

O.ex IN<NOWN O.7X

0.1:1 0.4:1

<10+

J5-JG

JO-J4.

~211

20-24-

<20

0

o 1000

1'.ex 11.3:1

15.2:1

12.e:1

2000 JOOO

NUMBER

FELONY RELEASES BY AGE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

12.U

13.3:1

20."

24.2:1 24.1:1

2.5.3:1

26.1:1 28.7X

22.e:1

3.1:1

500 1000 1500

82

57.7'"

4000 5000

• LOCAL FELONS

IZ'.l TOOC BACKUP

f2I TOOC

o SYSTEMWIDE

2O.7X

24.e:1

25.~

6000

9000 92.:3:1;

8000

7000

6000

N Usooo M 8 E4000

R 92.1~

JOOO

2000

1000

0 IAALE

5500

5000

4500

«.(IlI; 4000

NJ500

U3OQO M B 2500 E R2000

1500

1000

500

0 WHITE

FELONY RELEASES BY SEX FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

SEX

FELONY RELEASES BY RACE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92

55.0"

BLACK

RACE

83

7.9';

Systemwide Statistics ,

o SYSTEMWIDE

~ moc INHOUSE

ICI TDOC BACKUP

ISl LOCAL FELONS

B.O'; 7.2';

FEMALE

o SYSTEMWIDE

fZl TDOC INHOUSE

~ TDOC BACKUP

!;:S LOCAL FELONS

1.0" 0.9" 1.5" 0.7%

OTHER

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

PRIMARY

OfFENSE

FELONY RELEASPS • AVERAGE TIME SERVED BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROOP

FlSCAL YEAR 1991·92

TDOC INHOUSE TDOCBACKUP

AVERAGE AVERAGE

NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME

OF SERVED OF SERVED

LOCALLY SENTENCED

AVERAGE

NUMBER TIME

("F SERVED

GROliP OFFENDERS !YYIMMl OFFENDERS !YY1MMl OA'ENDERS !YYIMM)

HABITUAL OfFENDER 4 16/08 0 NlA 0 00100

HOMICIOO 230 6Kll 55 3/04 60 1/11

MURDER 1 10 16/08 1 22/lfJ 0 00100

MURlJ!!R2 142 7/01 12 5/11 1 9/11

anlER HOMIClDB 78 3100 42 2100 59 1pj

KIDNAPPING 26 5f(T7 8 3/01 8 1/10

SEX OFl'F.NSPS 153 7/00. 68 2/00. 107 2/01

RAP!:! ~ 7/11 19 3/05 29 3/05

AGORA VA TIlD RAPE 21 ' 9/10 2 2/02 0 00100

AGGRAVATIlDSEAUALBATTERY ~ 5/07 7 4/07 15 2110 OTHER SEX OfFF.NSPS 22 4f,XI 40 1/01 63 1/02

-ROBBERY 652 5/04 269 4100 227 1/04

AGGRA VA TID ROBBERY 487 S/IO 155 5/01 10 1107

ROBBERY 155 3,u! 104 , 2/07 166 1/06

anlER ROBBERY 10 2/11 10 liB 51 (¥10

BURGLARY 845 3,us 629 2Kl1 589 1m

AGORA VATID BUR(,'U\RY S27 3,u! 314 2/05 236 1107

BURGLARY.arHER 1HAN HABITATION 290 3/05 266 1/11 245 1100

arHER BIJRl.i"LARY 28 1/11 49 o,m Ill! (¥OS

'IllEFf AND STOLEN PROPERTY 335 2111 326 1110 363 (VII

THEFl' OF PROPERTY $10,(J00,$60/XIJ «> 1/02 31 0110 so (¥ll

THEFl' 01' PROPERTY $1 ,(JOO.$ I 0.000 245 3/04 185 2/05 181 1/01

THEFl' 01' PROPERTY$5ro$I,OOO 44 2!D4 92 1/04 119 (¥OS

OTHER 1llEFf AND STClI..EN PROPERTY 6 2100 18 DIll 13 (¥07

RJRGFRY.FRAUD AND IlMBEZZLllMENT !l8 2/07 lSI 1/04 95 1100

ASSAULT 30S 3/10 181 1/07 289 1/04

AGORA VATIDASSApLT 290 3/11 131 2/00 205 1/08

OTHER ASSAULT 15 II(» so 0/07 84 (¥07

0

ARSON 43 3100 24 1/07 18 1100

DRUG <FFENSFS 763 1/11 843 1/05 938 1/04

COCAINE OfFENSES S44 l,u! 589 1/07 415 1/10

anIER DRUG OfFENSES 219 2/05 :<S4 1/02 S23 (¥10

ESCAP[!(JAlL OR PRISON) 25 3KlI 21 1/07 7 1/01

ALLarHERS 54 2100 133 1/01 109 0/07

TarAL 3,533 3/10 2,708 I/ll ~10 1/CJ2

Nom -ESCAPES Nar INCLUDED.

84

SYSTEMWIDE

AVERAGE

NUMBER TIME

OF SERVED

OFFENDERS !YY!MM)

4 16/08

345 4/11

11 17/02

155 7100

179 2/05

42 4/06

328 4106

128 6/00.

23 9/01

52 4/07

125 I,u!

1148 4/00.

6S2 5/07

425 2/07 71 1/04

2063 2105

1,077 2/11

SOl 2/00.

185 0/11

1024 Ill!

121 1100

611 2/05

2SS 1/00.

TI l,uJ

344 1/07

775 2105

626 2/10

149 O,u!

85 YSR.

2544 1/06

1,548 l,u!

996 1/04

53 2/04

296 I/llJ

9,051 2/05

PRIMARY

OFF".cNSE

GROUP

HADmJAL mFENDER

HOMICIDE

MURDER I

MURDER 2

OUIER HOMICIDE

KIDNAPPING

SEX OFFENSES

RAPE

AG::lRAVATEDRAPE

Arn3RAVATEDSEXUALBAT1ERY

! OTIIER SEX OFFENSES

ROnOERY

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY

ROBBERY

O1HER ROBBERY

BURGLARY

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY

BURGLARY-OTHER THAN HABITATION

OTIIER BURGLARY

TIIEFr AND srOLEN PROPERTY

THEFr OF PROPER'IY 510,000·$60,000

THEFrOFPROPER'IY $1,000-$10.000

TIIEF.l'OFPROPER'IY 5500·$1,000

O1HER THEFr AND STOLEN PROPER'IY

, ·.FRAUD.ANI) • "'"'1llMENT

ASSAULT

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

O1HERASSAULT

ARSON

DRUG ." COCAINE OFFENSES

OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES

ESCAPE (]AlL OR PRISON)

All.Ol1WR~

TOI'AL

Systemwide Statistics $

FELONY RELEASES BY PRIMARY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

%OF %OF LOCALLY

TOOC INHOUSE TOOC BACKUP SENfENCED

INHOUSE TarAt BACKUP TarAL FELONS \.~~

4 0.1% 0 0.0% 0

237 6.6% 56 2.1% 60

13 0.4% I 0.0% 0

145 4.0% 12 0.4% I

79 2.2% 43 1.6% 59

27 0.7% 8 0.3% 8

153 4.'<)1. 68 ".~% 107

80 2.2% 19 0.7% 29

21 0.6% 2 0.1% 0

30 0.8% 7 0.3% IS

22 0.6% 40 1.5% 63

676 lR.R9,: "7JJ .1lW% .277

505 14.0% 155 5.7% 10

160 4.4% 105 3.9% 166

11 03% 10 0.4% 51

R61 "'.9% 63J """1<)1. 'iR9

537 14.9% 316 11.6% 236

296 8.2% 266 9.8% 245

28 0.8% 49 1.8% 108

348 9.7% 326 12.0% 364

41 1.1% 31 1.1% 50

256 7.1% 185 6.8% 182

45 1.2% 92 3.4% 119

6 0.2% 18 0.7% 13

100 2.8% 151 56% 95

306 85% 182 6.7% 289

291 8.1% 132 4.9% 205

15 0.4% 50 1.8% 84

44 1 )% "4 0.9% 18 .

765 21"9,: P,43 31.19,: 938

S46 15.2% 589 21.7% 415

219 6.1% 254 9.4% 523

26 0.7% 21 .0.8% 7

55 15% J:l"l 4.99,: 109

3,602 100.0% 2.713 100.0% 2,811

85

%OF %OF

LOCAL SYSTEM SYSTEM

TarAL TaTAL TOTAL

0.0% 4 0.0%

2.1% 353 3.9%

0.0% 14 0.2%

0.0% 158 1.7%

2.1% 181 2.0%

03% 43 05%

''1.8% 3'8 'Ui9,:

1.0% 128 1.4%

0.0% 23 03%

0.5% 52 0.6%

2.2% 125 1.4%

SJ% Ll73 n~cp;

0.4% 670 73%

5.9% 431 4.7%

1.8% 72 0.8%

21.0% "081 22.8<)1.

8.4% 1,089 11.9%

8.7% 807 8.8%

3.8% 185 2.0%

12.9% 1038 11.4%

1.8% 122 13%

6.5% 623 6.8%

4.2% 256 2.8%

0.5% 37 0.4%

3.49,: 346 3.S%

10.3% 777 8.5%

73% 628 6.9%

3.0% 149 1.6%

0.6% 86 0.9%

33.4~ 2546 27.9%

14.8% 1,550 17.1)%

18.6% 996 109%

0.29,: 54 0.69':

3.99,: 297 3.3%

100.0% 9,126 100.0%

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

PRIMARY

OFFENSE

GROllJ'

lIAllm.1AL or~·l'N!lF.R

IrOMrrml1

MlJRDlJR 1

MURDf1R2

O'J1lER HOMICIDE

KnlNAPI~N(j

. SEX OFFENSES

RAPE

AGGRAVATED RAPE

AGGRAVATED SEXUN. BATTERY

OTHER SEX OFFENSES

ROBBERY

AGGRAVA1EDROBDERY

ROBBERY

0lHER ROBBERY

BURGLARY

AGGRAVATED BURGLARY

BURGLARY.()11-ffiR THAN HABITATION

OlHERBURGLARY

TIIEFf AND ~LEN PROI'ERfY

nIEFf OF PROPERTY SI0,()()()"S60.000

TIIET'T OF PROPERTY $1,000·$10,000

TIIEFf OF PROffiRTY $500-S1,OOO

0ll1ER TIIEFf AND STOLFN PROffiRTY

'.FRAUD. A"~ '''~r;~' roMF,,",

ASSAULT

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

amERASSAULT

ARSON

DRl TG OFH~':"SES

COCAINE OFFENSES

OTIIER DRUG OFFENSES

E<;rAPI1 (JATT. OR PRrSONL

.ALL011IERS

TarAL

FELONY RELEASF ITPES BY PRlW-\RY OFFENSE GROUP FISCAL YEAR 1991·92

%OF ffiOBATION & %OF EXPIRATION

PAROLE COMMUNI1Y PROBATION AND

PAROl I' TorAl CORRECTION TarAT. anIER

4 0.1% 0 00% 0

257 4.'1% 37 15% 59

8 0.2% 0 0.0% 6

138 2.6% 2 0.1% 18

111 2.1% 35 lA% 35

2Q 0.6% 4 02% 10

50 0.'1% % 3.R'" IS?

29 0.6% 14 0.6% 85

14 03% 1 0.0% 8

6 0.1% 5 0.2% 41

1 0.0% 76 3.0% <Ill

%6 1R.3% 91 3.6% 116

594 113% 15 0.6% 61

343 6.5% 40 1.6% ..j8

29 0.6% 36 1.4% 7

1.??~ ?33CT, 568 225% 288

793 15.1% 143 5.7% 153

394 7.5% 297 11.8% 116

38 0.7% 128 5.1% 19

466 8.8% 406 16.1% 166

89 1.7% 27 1.1% 6

315 6.0% 192 7.6% 116

55 1.0% 166 6.6% 35

7 0.1% 21 0.8% 9

rI~ 2.691 . 155 6.1<;1; 56

407 7.7'" 208 S.?<;I; 16?

394 7.5% 88 3.5% 146

13 0.2% 120 4.8% 16

47 0.'1% 28 1.1% 11

1.608 30.5<;1; 713 28.20/, 225

1,044 19.8% 366 14.5% 140

564 10.7% 347 13.7% 85

.,~ o.~% 19 0.8% 10

, 49 0.9% ?(II 8M;' 47

5,268 100.0% 2,526 100.0% 1,332

86

%OF

OTHER %OF

TarA! TOTAl. TarAI.

0.0% 4 0.0%

4.4% .,~.

353 3.9%

05% 14 0.2%

IA% 158 1.7%

2.6% 181 2.0%

0.8% 43 0.5'"

13.70/, 328 3.691

6.4% 128 1.4%

0.6% 23 03%

3.1% 52 0.6%

3.6% 125 1.4%

8.7% 1173 12.9%

4.6% 670 73%

3.6% 431 4.7%

0.5% 72 0.8%

':11.6% ?O81 'n.8%

11.5% 1,089 11.9%

8.7% 807 3.8%

lA% 185 2.0%

12.5% 1038 11.4%

05% 122 13%

8.7% 623 6.8%

2.6% 256 2.8%

0.7% 37 0.4%

41CT, 346 3.80/,

11.2% m 85<;1;

11.0% 628 6.9%

1.2% 149 1.6%

0.8% 86 0.9%

16.9% ?546 ?7.9o/,

10.5% 1,550 17.0%

6A% 996 10.9%

0.8% 54 0.691

3~<;I; 297 3.3%

100.0% 9,126 100.0%

PRIMARY

OFFENSB

GROUP

HABmJAL OrrENDER

HOMlODE

MURDER 1

MURDER 2

OTHER HOMlODB

KlDNAI'I'ING

SEX OI'FENSES

RAPEl

AGGRAVATED RAPS

AGGRAVATEDSUXUALBATTERY

OTHER SEX OFFENSES

. ROBBERY

AGGRA VA TED ROBBERY

ROBBERY

OTHER ROBBERY

BURGLARY

AGGRA VA'fED BURGLARY

BURGLARY -OTHER THAN HABITATION

OTIlERBURGLARY

111m AND STOLEN PROPSRTY

TIIIlfT OF PROPSRTY SIO,(J()i).$60,ooo

TIIIlfT OF PROPSRTY SI,(J()O.SIO,OOO

THEFT OF PROPSRTY S5()().SI,OOO

OTHER 'rum AND STOLEN PROPERTY

R>RGERY FRAUD AND EWJlBZlLEMENT ,-ASSAULT

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

OTHER ASSAULT

ARSON

DRUG OFFENSES

COCAINE OFl'ENSES

OTHER DRUG OFFENSES

ESCAPE HAIL OR PRISON)

AU.OTIlERS

TOTAL

Nom· ESCAPES NOT INCLUDED,

FELONY REl.,EASES· AVERAG!lTIME SERVED BY RELEASE TYPE

FISCAL YEAR 199 ).92

PROBATION AND

PAROLE COMMUNITY CORRECIlON

A\~GE AVERAGE

NlIMBER TIME NlIMBER TIME

OF SERVED OF SERVED

OFFENDERS IYY/MM) OFFENDERS (yYIMM)

4 16/08 0 00,00

257 5,Q2 37 0110

8 19/02 0 00,00

138 &US 2 1/10

111 2,\)5 35 q.m

29 4&$ 4 0108

50 1111 96 0110

29 1/08 14 1,u4

14 8/11 I 0111

6 6,{)1 5 2/01

I 8/10 76 0/07

9£6 4&<! 91 1,u4

594 5/05 15 3,u4

343 2,\J6 40 1/01

29 1/08 36 q.m

1225 llB 568 OlIO

793 2/11 143 1/01

394 2/11 297 q.m

38 1/11 128 0/06

466 "" 2,\)5 406 0108

89 1/01 27 0/06 315 2/10 192 0111

55 2,\)2 166 0/07

7 1/06 21 0{05

135 2,Q4 155 0/07

407 llB 208 0108

394 2/11 88 Wl1

13 l/O\l 120 0/06

47 2/10 28 0110

1608 1,Q! 713 0108

1,044 1/11 366 WID

564 1/07 347 0/06

25 2111 19 0107

49 2(l1 201 0/06

5,268 2/11 2,526 q.m

87

Systemwide Statistics

EXPIRATION

AND OTHER SYSTEMWIDE

AVERAGE AVERAGE

NUMBER TIME NUMBER TIME

OF SERVED OF SERVED

OFFENDERS IYYIMM) OFFENDERS (YY/MM)

0 00I0O 4 16Al~

51 6/01 345 4111

3 11/10 11 17Al2

15 9/11 155 7,QJ

33 3,1)8 179 1M

9 ~1)2 42 4AJ6

182 S,Q5 328 4AJ6

85 &Q6 128 6{02

8 lW07 23 9ft)!

41 4,{l8 52 4,Q7

48 :VOl 125 I,Q!

91 Ml6 1,148 4m

43 9,Q2 652 sm 42 oW5 425 2/07

6 2,\J6 71 U04

270 3/11 2063 W5 . 141 4,Q5 1,077 2/11

110 ~ 801 2m

19 1m 185 Dill

152 3,Q2 1024 1/11

5 om 121 1/00

104 3/10 611 2M 34 2,QI 255 I/O!

9 1/11 37 1/00

54 2Al5 344 1m

160 3m 775 2'{)5

144 3/06 626 2110

16 1,Q4 149 o,rn

10 3m 85 2m

223 2,Q6 2.544 1106

138 2,Q8 1.548 I,Q!

85 2,Q2 996 1,Q4

9 4,Q4 53 2Al4

46 2,Q6 296 1m

1.257 3/11 9,051 1M

Directory

(I). z o ~ o 9 z o ~ LLJ 0:: 0::: o o lI.. o

~ i!~ .~

0.:. laJ Q

Directory

91

Fiscal Year 1991·92 Annual Report

Department of Correction

Central Office Management Staff Directory

Christine Bradley, Commissioner (615) 741·2071

Commissioner's Staff

Charles Bass, Deputy to the Commissioner

Jim Thrasher, Assistant to Commissioner

Susan MaUson, Assistant to Commissioner, Planning and Research

Brandon Maloney, Infonnation Officer

Dianne Neal, General Counsel

Pat Weiland, Director of Compliance

Chuck Reusing, Accreditation

Andy Soltys. Internal Affairs

Phil Coleman, Internal Audit

Administrative Seryjces

Leon Joyner, Assistant Commissioner

Fred Hix, Director of Budget Tom Mathis. Director of Correctional Enterprises Tom Giese, Director of Engineering Ted Fellman, Director of Fiscal Services Carl Hill, Director of Management Support Brandon Powers, Director of Management Infonnation Services

William Keeling, Manager of Sentence Management Services Doug Bennett, Director of Personnel

Trainjnll Facility

David Poindexter, Superintendent

Tennessee Correction Academy Post Office Box 1510 Tullahoma, TN 37388

92

741-6898

741-6898

741-6918

741-2071

741-3087

741-6085

741-4385

741-3069

741-2436

741-3720

741-6932 741-5705 741-2841 741-2351 741-2351 741-0900 741-2773 741-0673

(615) 455-5413 N~ ,twork: 840-4533

2/28/93

Adult Institutions

Linda Dodson. Assistmu Commissioner

Howard Cook. Director of Classification Lamar Ervin. Director of Education Ope Oshomoji, Coordinator of Food Services Wilfred Rabi. Director of Health Scrvices Lcnny Lococo, Director of Mental Health Programming Brenda Clark. Drug Program Coordinator

Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility 7575 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Nashville, TN 37243-0475 J. R. Miller, Warden (615) 350-2700

Community Services

Carey Rogers. Assistant Commissioner

Don Harris. Director of Field Services Mike Jones, Director of Administration

93

Director,!

741-2192

741-5754 741-4718 741-4385 741-2607 741-6918 741-5493

741-5752

741-3141 741-5493

2/28/93

~'iscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

East Tennesse~.\Re~i()n

David Mills, Regional Administrator East Tennessee Region Office of the Regional Administrator Route 4, Box 600 Pikeville, TN 37367 (615) 881-3139 Network: 520-6398

Brushy Mountain State Penitentiary Post Office Box 1000 Petros, TN 37845 (615) 324-4011 Network: 250-6425 Gil Monroe, Warden

Carter County Work Camp Caller #1 Roan Mountain, TN 37687 (615) 772-3231 Network: 240-9153 Harold Smith, Warden

Chattanooga Community Service Center 815 North Hickory Street C.clttanooga, TN 37404 (615) 634-3189 Network: 520-3189 John Patterson, Warden

Knoxville Community Service Ctntet< 3735 Riverside Drive Knoxville, TN 37914 (615) 594-6394 Network: 250-6394 Joe Fowler, Warden

Institutions

Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility Post Office Box 2000 Wartburg, TN 37887 (615) 346-6641 Network: 250-6573 David Newberry, Warden

Northeast Correctional Center Post Office Box 5000 Mountain City, TN 37683-5000 (615) 727-7387 Howard Carlton, Warden

Southeastern Tennessee State Regional Correctional Facility Route 4, Box 600 Pikeville, TN 37367 (615) 881-3251 Network: 520-6395 James Bowlen, Warden

94 2/28/93

Directory

jnstjtutjons (Continued)

Middle Tennessee Reldon

Donal CrunpbeU, Regional Administrator Middle Tennessee Regional Office 100 Bomar Boulevard NashviHe, TN 37243-0474 (615) 741-7144 Network: 840-7144

Middle Tennessee Reception Center 7177 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Nashville, TN 37243-0470 (615) 7414840 Network: 840-4202 Jack Morgan, Warden

Nashville Community Service Center 7466 CentclUlial Place Extended Nashville, TN 37243-0466 (615) 741-6587 Network: 840-6587 Jim Dickman, Warden

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 7475 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Nashville, TN 37243-0471 (615) 741-7876 Network: 840-7876 Mike Dutton, Warden

95

South Central Correctional Center P.O. Box 279 Clifton, TN 38425-0279 (615) 676-5372 Network: 676-5346 John Rees, Warden

Tennessee Prison for Women 3881 Slewart.') Lane Nashville, TN 37243-0468 (615) 741-1245 Network: 840-1245 Penny Bernhardt, Warden

Turney Center Industrial Prison Route 1 Only, TN 37140 (615) 129-.5161 Network: 840-1679 Ricky Bell, Warden

2/28/93

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Institutions (Continued)

West Tepnessee RelZion

Billy McWherter, Regional Administrator West Tennessee Regional Office 817 Church Street Tiptonville. TN 38079 (901) 253-9000

Fort Pillow Pri~on and Farm Route 2 Henning, TN 38041 (901) 738-5051 Network: 350-8011 Fred Raney, Warden

Lake County Regional Correctional Facility Route 1, Box 330 Tiptonville. TN 38079 (901) 253-9995 Network: 340-6514 Robert Conley, Warden

Mark H. Luttrell Reception Center 6000 S tate Road Memphis, TN 38134 (901) 372-2080 Network: 360-7914 Bruce MacDonald, Warden

96

Northwest Correctional Center Route 1, Box 660 Tiptonville, TN 38079 (901) 253-6272 Network: (901) 286-8367 Donnie Noles, Warden

W2yne County Boot Camp Post Office Box 182 Clifton, TN 38425 (615) 676-3345 Network: 741-1545 Malcolm Davis, Warden

West Tennessee High Security Facility Route 2, Green's Chapel Road Henning, TN 38041 (901) 738-5044 Network: 350-7789 Billy Compton, Warden

2/28/93

Delta Region Tenth Floor, State Office Building 170 North Main Street Memphis, TN 38103 (901) 543-7380 Network: 360-7380 George Little, Director

East Tennessee Region 2700 Middlebrook Pike Sll~te 210. State Plaza Knoxville. TN 37921 (615) 594-6577 Network: 250-6577 John Clabo, Director

First Tennessee Region 196 Montgomery Street Johnson City, TN 37601 (615) 928-8111 Network: 854-5320 Danny McGinnis, Director

Mid~CumJJerland Region' Eleventh Floor, Executive Building 1719 West End Avenue Nashville, TN 37243-0472 (615) 741-3269 Network: 840-3269 Bettye Alsup, Director

Northwest Region Post Office Box 749 Route 2, Captial Drive Dresden. TN -: 8225 (901) 364-3147 Network: 340-6531 Robert Austin, Director

Directo,!!

Regional Probation Offices

97

South Central Region 2506 Pillow Drive Columbia, TN 38401 (615) 380-2575 Network: 840-8575 William Clardy, Director

Southeast Region Ste. 250 E, Interstate Building 540 McCallie A venue Chattanooga, TN 37402 (615) 634-6442 Network: 470-6442 James Green, Director

Southwest Region 360 North Cumberland Street Jackson, TN 38301 (901) 423-5788 Network: 340-5788 Michael Cole, Director

Upper Cumberland Region Post Office Box 3231 442 Neal Street East Cookeville. TN 38502-3231 (615) 741-0292 Network: 840-0292 John Alcorn, Director

2/28/93

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Blountville Field Office Post Office Box 425 Blountville, TN 37617 (615) 323-4197 Network: 854-5305 Robert Henshaw, Office Manager

Charlotte Field Office General Delivery Charlotte. TN 37036 (615) 789-9291 Nashville Line: (615) 741-5773 David Deavers, (Contact)

Clarksville Field Office 115 North Third Street Post Office Box 442 Clarksville. TN 37042-0442 (615) 648-5550 Network: 450-5550 Donald McIntosh, Office Manager

Cleveland Field Office 478 First Street, N.W. Cleveland, TN 37311 (615) 478-0313 Network: 530-0313 E. J. Harmon, Office Manager

Clinton Field Office 423 South Main Street Clinton, TN 37716 (615) 457-4995 Network: 250-6546 Phillip Carr, Office Manager

Dyersburg Field Office 435 West Markel Street Dyersburg, TN 38024 (901) 286-8319 Network: 360-5319 Jerry Steele, Office Manager

Probation field Offices

98

Gallatin Field Office 176 West Franklin Gallatin. TN 37066 (615) 451-648-5550 Network: 840-3269 Connie Topps, Contact

Greenville Field Office 905 B Mason Street Greeneville, TN 37743 (615) 638-2994 Network: 854-5352 Linda Woods, Office Manager

Lebanon Field Office 212 East Main Street Lebanon, TN 37087 (615) 443-2759 Rick Oakley, Contact

Madisonville I<'ield Office 137 1/2 College Street Madisonville, TN 37354 (615) 442-3936 E. J. Harmon, Office Manager

Maryville Field Office 304 Home Avenue Maryville, TN 37801 (615) 981-2360

. John Riley, Probation Manager

McMinnville Field Office 203 West Main McMinnville, TN 37110 (615) 473-7213 Sammy Howard, Office Manager

North Memphis Field Office 1633 Madison Avenue Memphis, TN 38104 (901) 543-7383 Network: 360-7750 Ouida Stamper, Office Manager

2/28/93

Directory

Probation Field Offices (Coptinued)

South Memphis Field Office 3358 South Third Street Tullahoma, TN 37388 (615) 741-2903 Network: 840-2903 Benjrunin Poindexter, Probation Manager

Morristown Field Office Courthouse Almex Morristown. TN 37814 (615) 587-7052 Dennis Holt. Contact

Murfreesboro Field Office 323 North Walnut Street Murfreesboro. TN 37130 (615) 898-8030 Network: 470-8030 Carl Berning. Office Manager

Tullahoma Field Office Post Office Box 281 Tullahoma, TN 37388 (615) 741-2903 Janet Ledsinger, Office Manager

Commupity Correction A2epcies

Anderson County Community Corrections Community Alternative TreaUnent Services 101 South Main Street, Suite 400 Clinton. TN 37716 (615) 457-7390 AI Traywick. Program Manager

Corrections Management Corporation 317 North Main P.O, Box 401 Somerville, TN 38068 (901) 465-9258 Larry Harvey, Program Manager

Davidson County Community Corrections 207 Third Avenue North Fifth Floor Nashville, TN 37201 (615) 862-8170 Joe Morrell, Acting Program Manager

Decatur County Community Corrections Pleasant Street, P.O. Box 116 Decaturville, TN 38329 (901) 852-2111 Mary Jo Smith, Program Manager

99

East Tennessee HumanResourceAgency 408 North Cedar Bluff Road Suite 400 Knoxville, TN 37923 (615) 691-2551 Frank Tucker, Acting Program Manager

First Tennessee Human Resource Agency 101 Wilson Avenue Johnson City, TN 37604 (615) 461-8236 Sam Fann, Program Manager

Hamilton County Community Corrections 225 North Holly St. Chattanooga, TN 37404 (615) 493-9268 Tommy Wright, Program Manager

Hay House Box 2071 Kingsport, TN 37662 (615) 378-5709 Chuck Walsh, Program Manager

2/28/93

Fiscal Year 1991-92 Annual Report

Community Correction Agencies (Continued)

.Justice Network, Inc. 202 Union. 2nd Floor Memphis. TN 38103 (901) 529-9544 Colleen McAllister, Acting Program Manager

Knox County Community Alternative to Prison Program 1814 Lake Avenue Knoxville. TN 37996-3925 (615) 974-0881 Linda McLaughlin, Prog.';Un Manager

Madison County Community Corrections 102 Easl Baltimore Suite 201, Elks Building Jackson. TN 38301 (901) 422-1561 Bob Andersen. Progmm Manager

Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency 442 Metroplex P.O. Box 11149 Nashville, TN 37222-1419 (615) 331-6033 Nancy Manning. Program Manager

Montgomery/Robert.'IDn County Community Corrections 100 South Third Street P.O. Box 368 Clarksville, TN 37041-0368 (615) 648-5776 Rex Cummings. Prognun Manager

100

Project Free World 1330 Lauderdale Memphis, TN 38106 (90l) 947-3644 Ted Hawkins. Program Manager

South Central Human Resource Agency P.O. Box 738 Fayetteville, TN 37334 (615) 433-7182 Cathy Hayes, Program Manager

Southeast Tennessee Community Corrections 30 1/2 Second St. N.W. Cleveland. TN 37311 (615) 478-2030 Gary Conner, Program Manager

Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency 215 Rankin Avenue P.O. Box 805 Dunlap, TN 37237 (615) 949-2191 Chris Kleehammer, Program Manager

Upper Cumberland Human Resource Agency 3111 Enterprise Drive Cookeville. TN 38501-4258 (615) 537-1127 Buster Stockton, Program Manager

2/28/93

----~--~ --

RESEARCH BRIEFS AND PUBLICATIONS

The following research briefs and reports were published by the Planning and Research Section. Copies of these publications are available in the Planning and Research Section.

PUBLICA TION

Older Incarcerated Felons in Terulessee

Tennessee Correction Capacity Fiscal Years 1992 Through 1994

Female Felons in Terulcssee

Department's Use of Minimum Restricted Custody Classification

Wayne County Boot Camp Update

Sex Offender ProfIle

Incarcerated Felon Population Projections

Needs Assessment Study

Incarcerated Drug Offenders

Commitments to Incarceration by Offense Group Fiscal Years 1986-87 Through 1990-91 - Update

Profile of Sex Offenders and Victims

Death Row

Life-Sentenced Inmates

Changes in Total Correctional Population - Update

Evaluation and Revision of Probation Risk A'5sessment Instrument

1.990 and 1991 Prison Drug Testing Results

Wayne County Boot Camp Monitoring Report

Diversionary Effectiveness of Community Alternative Programs

Felony Inmate Population Projections

101

PUBUCA TION DATE

January 1991

February 1991

Aprii 1991

May 1991

MJ:ly 1991

June 1991

August 1991

October 1991

October 1991

October 1991

December 1991

January 1992

February 1992

February 1992

March 1992

April 1992

April 1992

November 1992

January 1993