Team report: PGE Skra Bełchatów - Untan · Via Teamreport:PGESkraBełchatow´ 2020-05-11 Contents...

Via https://apps.untan.gl/teamrep/

Team report: PGE Skra Bełchatow

2020-05-11

Contents1 Data set summary 32 Team roster: PGE Skra Bełchatow 33 Team worksheet 44 Team comparisons 54.1 Comparison table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

4.2 Comparison table (continued) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

4.3 SO% win breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

4.4 SO% loss breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

4.5 BP% win breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

4.6 BP% loss breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

5 Serve 115.1 Serve evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

5.2 Expected breakpoint % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

5.3 Serve efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

5.4 Breakpoint % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

5.5 Individual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

5.5.1 Srecko Lisinac (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

5.5.2 Mariusz Wlazły (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

5.5.3 Bartosz Bednorz (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

5.5.4 Patryk Czarnowski (9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5.5.5 Milad Ebadipour (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

5.5.6 Grzegorz Łomacz (15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

6 Reception 256.1 Reception evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

6.2 Expected sideout % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

6.3 Reception efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

6.4 Sideout % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

6.5 By serve type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

6.5.1 Reception evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

6.5.2 Expected sideout % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.5.3 Reception efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

1

https://apps.untan.gl/teamrep/


6.5.4 Sideout % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.6 Individual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

6.6.1 Bartosz Bednorz (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

6.6.2 Milad Ebadipour (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

6.6.3 Kacper Piechocki (16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

6.6.4 Nikolay Penchev (17) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

6.6.5 Robert Milczarek (18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

7 Setting 357.1 Set distribution: Grzegorz Łomacz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

7.1.1 On perfect or good reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

7.1.2 On OK reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

7.1.3 On poor reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

7.1.4 With setter call [no setter call] (perfect/good reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

7.1.5 With setter call K1 (perfect/good reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

7.1.6 With setter call K7 (perfect/good reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

7.1.7 With setter call KE (perfect/good reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

7.1.8 Setter shifted to 2 (perfect (#)/good (+)/OK (!) reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

7.1.9 Setter shifted to 4 (perfect (#)/good (+)/OK (!) reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

7.1.10 In transition (perfect/good dig only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

7.1.11 In crunch time (perfect/good reception only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

8 Attack 458.1 All attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

8.2 Reception attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

8.2.1 Reception attack after own reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

8.3 Transition attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

8.4 Middle attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

8.4.1 Reception attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

8.4.2 Transition attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

8.5 Attack charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

8.5.1 Srecko Lisinac (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

8.5.2 Mariusz Wlazły (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

8.5.3 Bartosz Bednorz (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

8.5.4 Patryk Czarnowski (9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

8.5.5 Milad Ebadipour (11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

9 Blocking 509.1 All players . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

9.2 By attack code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

9.3 Middle blocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

10 Keys 5410.1 Worksheet key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

10.2 Attacking key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

10.2.1 Middle attackers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

10.3 Blocking key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

10.3.1 By attack code/zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

10.3.2 Middle blocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

11 Settings used for this report 59

PGE Skra Bełchatow 2



1 Data set summary

Team Played Won Win rate Sets played Sets won Set win rate Points for Points against Points ratio

Aluron Virtu Warta Zawiercie 2 0 0.0 7 1 0.14 142 170 0.84

Asseco Resovia Rzeszow 2 2 1.0 7 6 0.86 168 149 1.13

BBTS Bielsko-Biała 2 0 0.0 8 2 0.25 163 191 0.85

Cerrad Czarni Radom 2 1 0.5 8 4 0.50 178 179 0.99

Cuprum Lubin 2 2 1.0 8 6 0.75 188 170 1.11

Dafi Społem Kielce 2 0 0.0 6 0 0.00 117 152 0.77

Espadon Szczecin 2 0 0.0 9 3 0.33 199 206 0.97

GKS Katowice 2 1 0.5 8 4 0.50 191 181 1.06

Indykpol AZS Olsztyn 2 2 1.0 8 6 0.75 193 157 1.23

Jastrzebski Wegiel 2 1 0.5 7 3 0.43 166 174 0.95

Łuczniczka Bydgoszcz 2 1 0.5 7 3 0.43 160 172 0.93

MKS Bedzin 2 0 0.0 7 1 0.14 141 176 0.80

ONICO Warszawa 2 1 0.5 8 5 0.62 172 163 1.06

PGE Skra Bełchatow 2 1 0.5 7 4 0.57 168 159 1.06

Trefl Gdansk 2 2 1.0 8 6 0.75 181 152 1.19

ZAKSA Kedzierzyn-Kozle 2 2 1.0 7 6 0.86 177 153 1.16

2 Team roster: PGE Skra Bełchatow

Number Player name player ID Listed roles (matches) Matches played

1 Srecko Lisinac 666 M (2) 2

2 Mariusz Wlazły 3 Opp (2) 2

5 Marcin Janusz 272 S (2) 1

6 Karol Kłos 103 M (2) 2

7 Bartosz Bednorz 642 OH (2) 2

8 Milan Katic 29811 OH (2) 0

9 Patryk Czarnowski 36 M (2) 2

11 Milad Ebadipour 30331 OH (2) 2

13 Szymon Romac 27990 Opp (2) 1

14 Aleksandar Nedeljkovic 30330 M (2) 1

15 Grzegorz Łomacz 32 S (2) 2

16 Kacper Piechocki 282 L (1) 1

17 Nikolay Penchev 670 OH (2) 2

18 Robert Milczarek 107 L (2) 1

20 Przemysław Stasiek 29975 L (1) 0




3 Team worksheetSideoutsN OPP SRV SO SO% OPP SRV ERRS OPP SRV ERR% mod SO% EXP SO%

159 112 70.4% 36 22.6% 61.8% 60.4%

ReceptionN %PERF %POS+PERF %ERR %POOR EFF EFF J EFF F

123 13% 40.7% 7.3% 3.3% 30.1% 16.4% 41.2%

Reception attackN KILL% EFF

TOT 110 55.5% 32.7%

REC # 16 68.8% 43.8%

REC + 34 67.6% 47.1%

REC ! 38 57.9% 44.7%

REC - 22 22.7% -18.2%

REC / 0

Reception sideoutSO% TOT SO% JUMP SO% FLOAT

TOT 70.4% 68.3% 72.7%

REC # 75% 83.3% 70%

REC + 76.5% 91.7% 68.2%

REC ! 76.3% 61.1% 90%

REC - 40.9% 20% 58.3%

REC / 0% 0% 0%

TOT excluding serve

errors

61.8% 52.7% 69.1%

In sets won 61.9% 51.7% 70.6%

In sets lost 61.7% 53.8% 67.6%

Reception first ball sideoutFBSO% TOT FBSO% JUMP FBSO% FLOAT OPP FBSO% TOT

49.6% 47.3% 51.5% 41.2%

BreakpointsN BP BP% SRV ERRS ERR% BP% JUMP BP% FLOAT mod BP% EXP BP% EXP OPP SO%

168 56 33.3% 35 20.8% 31.8% 36.2% 36.4% 33.5% 57.7%

ACES ACE%

SERVE TOT 12 7.1%

JUMP 10 9.1%

FLOAT 2 3.4%

BLOCKS BLOCK%

BLOCK TOT 9 6.7%

Breakpoint transition attackN KILL% EFF ATT/D K/D

47 44.7% 27.7% 44.8% 20%

AttackN KILL% EFF ATT/D K/D OPP KILL%

TOT 175 53.1% 33.1% 49.4

TRANS 65 49.2% 33.8% 48.1% 23.7% 46.8

Scoring by rotation (including serve errors)OPP N SRV SO SO% mod SO% N SRV BP BP%

P1 19 16 84.2% 80.0 29 14 48.3%

P6 36 23 63.9% 55.2 29 9 31%

P5 28 21 75% 65.0 28 7 25%

P4 29 19 65.5% 54.5 36 15 41.7%

P3 26 17 65.4% 57.1 25 7 28%

P2 21 16 76.2% 68.8 21 4 19%

TOT 159 112 70.4% 61.8 168 56 33.3%

FreeballsN KILL% WON %WON

TOT 12 58.3% 10 83.3%

F# 8 62.5% 7 87.5%

F+ 3 66.7% 2 66.7%

Errors and points wonERRS ERRS/100 ERRS2/100 PTS PTS/100

ALL 56 17.1 6.4 116 35.5

SETS WON 29 15.8 4.9 71 38.6

SETS LOST 27 18.9 8.4 45 31.5




4 Team comparisons4.1 Comparison tableValues in brackets give the rank of each team for that statistic.

Team SO% TOT SO% JUMP SO% FLOAT FBSO% OPP FBSO%

Aluron Virtu Warta Zawiercie 61.1 (13) 61.9 (14) 60.2 (14) 35.3 (14) 47.4 (11)

Asseco Resovia Rzeszow 68.2 (9) 67.9 (9) 68.7 (8) 49.6 (2) 35.3 (1)

BBTS Bielsko-Biała 57.7 (16) 64.5 (13) 54.3 (16) 34.8 (15) 46.8 (10)

Cerrad Czarni Radom 69.3 (8) 65.7 (11) 81.0 (2) 46.3 (9) 40.6 (5)

Cuprum Lubin 66.7 (11) 65.7 (11) 68.1 (9) 47.2 (7) 41.1 (6)

Dafi Społem Kielce 59.3 (15) 60.3 (15) 58.3 (15) 33.6 (16) 61.1 (16)

Espadon Szczecin 64.9 (12) 70.4 (6) 61.3 (13) 41.2 (12) 48.6 (12)

GKS Katowice 74.0 (2) 77.7 (1) 66.7 (10) 47.9 (5) 45.4 (9)

Indykpol AZS Olsztyn 73.6 (3) 71.7 (3) 76.1 (4) 51.5 (1) 38.1 (4)

Jastrzebski Wegiel 67.8 (10) 70.6 (5) 61.8 (12) 45.0 (10) 49.3 (13)

Łuczniczka Bydgoszcz 71.5 (4) 71.2 (4) 72.7 (6) 47.4 (6) 53.4 (15)

MKS Bedzin 60.9 (14) 59.0 (16) 64.9 (11) 41.0 (13) 50.4 (14)

ONICO Warszawa 71.2 (5) 68.4 (7) 75.4 (5) 42.9 (11) 43.4 (8)

PGE Skra Bełchatow 70.4 (6) 68.3 (8) 72.7 (6) 49.6 (2) 41.2 (7)

Trefl Gdansk 74.2 (1) 72.8 (2) 78.0 (3) 47.2 (7) 36.0 (2)

ZAKSA Kedzierzyn-Kozle 70.3 (7) 66.9 (10) 81.1 (1) 48.8 (4) 37.2 (3)

Team KILL% OPP KILL% REC ATT KILL% REC ATT EFF

Aluron Virtu Warta Zawiercie 44.1 (13) 51.1 (12) 43.6 (14) 28.2 (14)

Asseco Resovia Rzeszow 50.8 (5) 36.6 (1) 58.0 (1) 42.9 (2)

BBTS Bielsko-Biała 38.3 (16) 48.7 (8) 42.5 (15) 26.9 (16)

Cerrad Czarni Radom 53.3 (1) 50.3 (10) 55.6 (4) 36.3 (8)

Cuprum Lubin 47.3 (11) 42.9 (4) 54.4 (6) 40.8 (4)

Dafi Społem Kielce 38.5 (15) 59.9 (16) 41.2 (16) 27.8 (15)

Espadon Szczecin 40.3 (14) 46.7 (6) 46.4 (13) 31.8 (12)

GKS Katowice 50.2 (6) 50.3 (10) 53.1 (7) 39.2 (7)

Indykpol AZS Olsztyn 51.0 (4) 38.9 (2) 57.6 (2) 42.4 (3)

Jastrzebski Wegiel 46.8 (12) 52.6 (13) 50.0 (11) 34.9 (9)

Łuczniczka Bydgoszcz 49.2 (8) 52.7 (14) 52.9 (9) 39.7 (5)

MKS Bedzin 48.4 (9) 55.2 (15) 51.8 (10) 30.7 (13)

ONICO Warszawa 47.9 (10) 47.1 (7) 49.1 (12) 34.5 (10)

PGE Skra Bełchatow 53.1 (3) 49.4 (9) 55.5 (5) 32.7 (11)

Trefl Gdansk 53.2 (2) 43.8 (5) 57.1 (3) 47.6 (1)

ZAKSA Kedzierzyn-Kozle 49.3 (7) 41.7 (3) 53.0 (8) 39.3 (6)




4.2 Comparison table (continued)Values in brackets give the rank of each team for that statistic.

Team BP% TOT BP% JUMP BP% FLOAT ACE%

Aluron Virtu Warta Zawiercie 27.6 (13) 29.0 (13) 19.0 (15) 3.4 (13)

Asseco Resovia Rzeszow 39.2 (3) 31.0 (10) 43.5 (1) 4.2 (10)

BBTS Bielsko-Biała 32.7 (8) 33.7 (6) 31.7 (9) 5.5 (8)

Cerrad Czarni Radom 30.3 (10) 29.7 (12) 32.5 (8) 6.2 (4)

Cuprum Lubin 39.6 (2) 38.3 (2) 40.6 (4) 6.4 (2)

Dafi Społem Kielce 23.5 (15) 25.0 (15) 21.3 (14) 3.4 (13)

Espadon Szczecin 33.0 (7) 32.7 (8) 33.3 (7) 5.0 (9)

GKS Katowice 29.8 (11) 30.6 (11) 22.2 (13) 3.1 (15)

Indykpol AZS Olsztyn 39.8 (1) 35.6 (4) 42.4 (2) 6.3 (3)

Jastrzebski Wegiel 28.9 (12) 33.0 (7) 23.6 (11) 6.0 (5)

Łuczniczka Bydgoszcz 23.1 (16) 23.4 (16) 22.6 (12) 2.5 (16)

MKS Bedzin 24.5 (14) 29.0 (13) 16.0 (16) 4.2 (10)

ONICO Warszawa 32.6 (9) 35.3 (5) 26.8 (10) 4.1 (12)

PGE Skra Bełchatow 33.3 (6) 31.8 (9) 36.2 (5) 7.1 (1)

Trefl Gdansk 37.1 (5) 39.3 (1) 35.1 (6) 5.6 (7)

ZAKSA Kedzierzyn-Kozle 38.9 (4) 37.6 (3) 40.9 (3) 5.7 (6)

Team BLOCK% ATT/D TOT ATT/D BP

Aluron Virtu Warta Zawiercie 3.8 (16) 42.9 (12) 32.7 (11)

Asseco Resovia Rzeszow 8.3 (8) 52.4 (6) 53.5 (2)

BBTS Bielsko-Biała 12.5 (3) 43.2 (11) 32.1 (12)

Cerrad Czarni Radom 14.1 (1) 42.3 (13) 37.8 (10)

Cuprum Lubin 12.0 (4) 47.8 (8) 49.6 (4)

Dafi Społem Kielce 13.8 (2) 45.1 (10) 21.4 (16)

Espadon Szczecin 6.2 (14) 54.2 (2) 48.6 (6)

GKS Katowice 10.0 (6) 53.3 (4) 49.2 (5)

Indykpol AZS Olsztyn 10.9 (5) 53.5 (3) 51.6 (3)

Jastrzebski Wegiel 7.6 (10) 37.3 (14) 31.1 (13)

Łuczniczka Bydgoszcz 5.5 (15) 36.4 (15) 31.1 (13)

MKS Bedzin 7.4 (12) 32.1 (16) 30.1 (15)

ONICO Warszawa 8.1 (9) 46.2 (9) 45.4 (7)

PGE Skra Bełchatow 6.7 (13) 48.1 (7) 44.8 (8)

Trefl Gdansk 7.6 (10) 54.6 (1) 44.3 (9)

ZAKSA Kedzierzyn-Kozle 8.7 (7) 53.3 (4) 54.0 (1)




4.3 SO% win breakdown

0

20

40

60

Trefl

Gda

ńsk

GKS

Katow

iceIn

dykp

ol AZ

S Ol

Łucz

niczk

a By

dgON

ICO

War

szaw

aPG

E Sk

ra B

ełch

aZA

KSA

Kędz

ierzy

Cerra

d Cz

arni

RAs

seco

Res

ovia

Jastr

zębs

ki W

ęg

Cupr

um L

ubin

Espa

don

Szcz

eci

Alur

on V

irtu

Wa

MKS

Będ

zinDa

fi Spo

łem

Kie

BBTS

Biel

sko-

Bi

SO%

Opp serve err

Rec att kill R#

Rec att kill R+

Rec att kill R!

Rec att kill R-

Trans att kill

Opp trans att err

Trans block

Other

Team Opp serve err Rec att kill R# Rec att kill R+ Rec att kill R! Rec att kill R- Trans att kill Opp trans att err Trans block Other

Aluron Virtu Wa 18.6% 7.8% 10.2% 7.8% 3% 9% 2.4% 1.2% 1.2%

Asseco Resovia 13.2% 14.6% 11.9% 9.9% 6.6% 6% 2.6% 2% 1.3%

BBTS Bielsko-Bi 13.2% 4.8% 12.7% 6.9% 5.8% 6.3% 3.2% 3.7% 1.1%

Cerrad Czarni R 16.8% 11.2% 14% 7.8% 5.6% 6.1% 3.4% 1.7% 2.8%

Cuprum Lubin 15.8% 8.2% 12.9% 8.2% 10.5% 6.4% 1.8% 1.8% 1.2%

Dafi Społem Kie 19.3% 3.3% 11.3% 9.3% 2.7% 7.3% 2.7% 2% 1.3%

Espadon Szczeci 17.1% 12.2% 10.2% 8.8% 2.9% 7.8% 2.4% 2% 1.5%

GKS Katowice 20.4% 11.6% 13.8% 8.8% 3.9% 8.8% 2.8% 1.1% 2.8%

Indykpol AZS Ol 17% 8.2% 15.7% 13.8% 5% 8.8% 0% 4.4% 0.6%

Jastrzebski Weg 19.5% 6.3% 8.6% 13.2% 8% 6.9% 2.3% 1.1% 1.7%

Łuczniczka Bydg 21.5% 8.1% 11.6% 13.4% 4.1% 4.7% 2.3% 5.2% 0.6%

MKS Bedzin 17.2% 8.6% 10.3% 10.3% 4.6% 4.6% 1.1% 2.9% 1.1%

ONICO Warszawa 22.7% 6.7% 16.6% 8% 1.8% 7.4% 2.5% 3.1% 2.5%

PGE Skra Bełcha 22.6% 6.9% 14.5% 13.8% 3.1% 6.9% 0.6% 1.3% 0.6%

Trefl Gdansk 18.1% 7.1% 9.7% 12.9% 9% 10.3% 1.9% 0.6% 4.5%

ZAKSA Kedzierzy 17.4% 9% 16.8% 9.7% 4.5% 9% 0% 1.3% 2.6%




4.4 SO% loss breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

Trefl

Gda

ńsk

GKS

Katow

iceIn

dykp

ol AZ

S Ol

Łucz

niczk

a By

dgON

ICO

War

szaw

aPG

E Sk

ra B

ełch

aZA

KSA

Kędz

ierzy

Cerra

d Cz

arni

RAs

seco

Res

ovia

Jastr

zębs

ki W

ęg

Cupr

um L

ubin

Espa

don

Szcz

eci

Alur

on V

irtu

Wa

MKS

Będ

zinDa

fi Spo

łem

Kie

BBTS

Biel

sko-

Bi

SO lo

ss %

Opp serve ace

Rec att err

Opp rec att block

Opp trans att kill

Trans att err

Opp trans block

Other

Team Opp serve ace Rec att err Opp rec att block Opp trans att kill Trans att err Opp trans block Other

Aluron Virtu Wa 7.2% 5.4% 4.8% 14.4% 3% 2.4% 1.8%

Asseco Resovia 6.6% 2% 9.3% 7.3% 2% 2.6% 2%

BBTS Bielsko-Bi 5.3% 6.9% 4.2% 17.5% 2.1% 4.8% 1.6%

Cerrad Czarni R 5% 7.3% 6.1% 11.2% 0.6% 0.6%

Cuprum Lubin 5.8% 5.8% 4.1% 13.5% 1.2% 1.2% 1.8%

Dafi Społem Kie 8.7% 2.7% 6% 16% 2.7% 2% 2.7%

Espadon Szczeci 5.9% 4.9% 5.9% 11.2% 1.5% 4.4% 1.5%

GKS Katowice 2.8% 3.3% 6.6% 11% 0.6% 0.6% 1.1%

Indykpol AZS Ol 2.5% 6.3% 5% 7.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.3%

Jastrzebski Weg 2.9% 5.7% 5.2% 10.9% 4% 1.7% 1.7%

Łuczniczka Bydg 2.3% 3.5% 5.8% 13.4% 2.3% 1.2%

MKS Bedzin 8.6% 4% 9.8% 12.6% 0.6% 1.1% 2.3%

ONICO Warszawa 3.7% 6.1% 3.7% 11.7% 1.2% 1.8% 0.6%

PGE Skra Bełcha 5.7% 7.5% 8.2% 6.3% 1.3% 0.6%

Trefl Gdansk 4.5% 2.6% 3.9% 11% 0.6% 1.9% 1.3%

ZAKSA Kedzierzy 2.6% 5.2% 5.2% 9.7% 3.2% 0.6% 3.2%




4.5 BP% win breakdown

0

10

20

30

40

Indy

kpol

AZS

Ol

Cupr

um L

ubin

Asse

co R

esov

ia ZA

KSA

Kędz

ierzy

Trefl

Gda

ńsk

PGE

Skra

Beł

cha

Espa

don

Szcz

eci

BBTS

Biel

sko-

BiON

ICO

War

szaw

aCe

rrad

Czar

ni R

GKS

Katow

iceJa

strzę

bski

Węg

Alur

on V

irtu

Wa

MKS

Będ

zinDa

fi Spo

łem

Kie

Łucz

niczk

a By

dg

BP%

Serve ace

Opp rec att err

Rec att block

Trans att kill

Opp trans att err

Trans block

Other

Team Serve ace Opp rec att err Rec att block Trans att kill Opp trans att err Trans block Other

Aluron Virtu Wa 3.4% 4.8% 2.8% 11% 2.1% 0.7% 2.8%

Asseco Resovia 4.2% 5.4% 4.2% 16.3% 3.6% 4.2% 1.2%

BBTS Bielsko-Bi 5.5% 4.2% 9.1% 7.9% 2.4% 2.4% 1.2%

Cerrad Czarni R 6.2% 3.4% 9.6% 9.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

Cuprum Lubin 6.4% 3.7% 8% 13.9% 1.1% 3.7% 2.7%

Dafi Społem Kie 3.4% 4.2% 8.4% 5% 0% 1.7% 0.8%

Espadon Szczeci 5% 5.5% 4.5% 12% 2% 1.5% 2.5%

GKS Katowice 3.1% 4.7% 6.8% 13.1% 0% 1.6% 0.5%

Indykpol AZS Ol 6.3% 7.3% 5.2% 13.1% 2.1% 4.7% 1%

Jastrzebski Weg 6% 6% 5.4% 7.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.8%

Łuczniczka Bydg 2.5% 1.9% 3.8% 11.9% 0.6% 1.2% 1.2%

MKS Bedzin 4.2% 6.3% 5.6% 7% 0% 0.7% 0.7%

ONICO Warszawa 4.1% 4.7% 5.2% 14.5% 0.6% 2.3% 1.2%

PGE Skra Bełcha 7.1% 3% 4.8% 12.5% 1.2% 0.6% 4.2%

Trefl Gdansk 5.6% 7.9% 4.5% 13.5% 2.2% 1.7% 1.7%

ZAKSA Kedzierzy 5.7% 6.3% 5.7% 14.3% 4% 2.3% 0.6%




4.6 BP% loss breakdown

0

20

40

60

80

Indy

kpol

AZS

Ol

Cupr

um L

ubin

Asse

co R

esov

ia ZA

KSA

Kędz

ierzy

Trefl

Gda

ńsk

PGE

Skra

Beł

cha

Espa

don

Szcz

eci

BBTS

Biel

sko-

BiON

ICO

War

szaw

aCe

rrad

Czar

ni R

GKS

Katow

iceJa

strzę

bski

Węg

Alur

on V

irtu

Wa

MKS

Będ

zinDa

fi Spo

łem

Kie

Łucz

niczk

a By

dg

BP lo

ss %

Serve err

Opp rec att kill R#

Opp rec att kill R+

Opp rec att kill R!

Opp rec att kill R-

Trans att err

Opp trans att kill

Opp trans block

Other

Team Serve err Opp rec att kill R# Opp rec att kill R+ Opp rec att kill R! Opp rec att kill R- Trans att err Opp trans att kill Opp trans block Other

Aluron Virtu Wa 20.7% 8.3% 15.2% 9.7% 4.1% 0.7% 10.3% 0.7% 2.8%

Asseco Resovia 16.3% 4.8% 10.8% 9.6% 4.2% 1.8% 8.4% 3.6% 1.2%

BBTS Bielsko-Bi 15.8% 10.9% 13.9% 9.1% 5.5% 1.2% 7.9% 2.4% 0.6%

Cerrad Czarni R 25.3% 8.4% 9.6% 7.9% 4.5% 2.8% 6.7% 2.8% 1.7%

Cuprum Lubin 12.8% 10.7% 11.8% 10.7% 2.7% 2.7% 7% 1.6% 0.5%

Dafi Społem Kie 24.4% 10.9% 15.1% 15.1% 5% 1.7% 2.5% 0.8% 0.8%

Espadon Szczeci 12.5% 8% 14% 12% 8.5% 0.5% 7% 3.5% 1%

GKS Katowice 20.4% 10.5% 10.5% 10.5% 4.7% 3.7% 5.8% 2.6% 1.6%

Indykpol AZS Ol 16.2% 7.9% 11% 8.4% 4.7% 2.1% 5.8% 2.6% 1.6%

Jastrzebski Weg 18.1% 8.4% 15.1% 12% 4.8% 0.6% 8.4% 1.8% 1.8%

Łuczniczka Bydg 16.9% 14.4% 15.6% 11.2% 3.1% 1.9% 7.5% 2.5% 3.8%

MKS Bedzin 18.2% 11.2% 14% 8.4% 7.7% 3.5% 7% 2.8% 2.8%

ONICO Warszawa 15.7% 5.8% 10.5% 12.8% 7.6% 1.2% 8.1% 2.9% 2.9%

PGE Skra Bełcha 20.8% 4.8% 9.5% 9.5% 8.3% 3% 7.1% 1.8% 1.8%

Trefl Gdansk 21.9% 3.4% 15.7% 6.2% 2.8% 2.2% 7.9% 1.1% 1.7%

ZAKSA Kedzierzy 17.1% 8.6% 9.7% 9.7% 2.9% 2.9% 8% 1.1% 1.1%




5 Serve5.1 Serve evaluation

0

10

20

30

N

0

25

50

75

100

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Grze

gorz

Łom

acz

Mar

iusz W

lazły

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Patry

k Cza

rnow

s

Sreć

ko L

isina

c

Perc

ent

Ace (#)

Positive (/)

Positive (+)

OK (!)

Negative (-)

Error (=)

5.2 Expected breakpoint %(Expected percentage of points won on serve, given this server’s serve evaluations and the league-wide BP% for

each of those evaluations)

0

10

20

30

N

0

10

20

30

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Grze

gorz

Łom

acz

Mar

iusz W

lazły

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Patry

k Cza

rnow

s

Sreć

ko L

isina

c

Valu

e

313233343536

ExpectedBP%




5.3 Serve efficiency(Aces + positive - errors - negative)/(N serves)

0

10

20

30

N

-40

-20

0

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Grze

gorz

Łom

acz

Mar

iusz W

lazły

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Patry

k Cza

rnow

s

Sreć

ko L

isina

c

Eff%

-40

-20

0

Efficiency (%)

5.4 Breakpoint %(Percentage of points won on serve)

0

10

20

30

N

0

10

20

30

40

50

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Grze

gorz

Łom

acz

Mar

iusz W

lazły

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Patry

k Cza

rnow

s

Sreć

ko L

isina

c

Valu

e

30

40

BP%




5.5 Individual5.5.1 Srecko Lisinac (1)

Position Serves Jump serves Ace% Err% EXP BP% EXP OPP SO% Eff% BP%

All (potentially including serves with

missing position information)

24 21 (87.5%) 8.3 33.3 30.8 53.8 -37.5 25

All (with position information) 20 17 (85%) 10.0 20.0 37.0 53.8 -25.0 30

Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 2 2 (100%) 0.0 0.0 30.7 69.3 -50.0 50

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 2 0 0.0 0.0 35.8 64.2 0.0 50

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 16 15 (93.8%) 12.5 25.0 37.9 49.4 -25.0 25

All serves with position information (N = 20):

Serves from the left (zones 5/7; N = 2):

Serves from the centre (zone 6, N = 2):

Serves from the right (zones 9/1, N = 16):




By opposition rotation: serve distribution

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

OPP P5 (N=4) OPP P6 (N=9) OPP P1 (N=0)


25

50

75

100

% of serves

By opposition rotation: expected breakpoint %

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



0

20

40

60

Expected BP%




5.5.2 Mariusz Wlazły (2)




30 30 (100%) 16.7 33.3 36.7 45.0 -3.3 36.7

All (with position information) 25 25 (100%) 20.0 20.0 44.0 45.0 16.0 44.0

Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 0 0

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 6 6 (100%) 33.3 0.0 68.6 31.4 100.0 83.3

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 19 19 (100%) 15.8 26.3 36.2 50.8 -10.5 31.6









Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



10

20

30

40

% of serves


Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



0

20

40

60

Expected BP%




5.5.3 Bartosz Bednorz (7)




27 27 (100%) 7.4 18.5 35.2 56.8 -7.4 29.6


Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 4 4 (100%) 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 50.0 25.0

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 4 4 (100%) 0.0 0.0 30.7 69.3 -50.0 50.0

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 14 14 (100%) 14.3 0.0 47.9 52.1 21.4 35.7









Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



25

50

75

100

% of serves


Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



0

25

50

75

100

Expected BP%




5.5.4 Patryk Czarnowski (9)




18 0 0 0 32.9 67.1 -55.6 22.2

All (with position information) 18 0 0 0 32.9 67.1 -55.6 22.2

Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 6 0 0 0 28.5 71.5 -83.3 16.7

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 1 0 0 0 27.4 72.6 -100.0 0.0

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 11 0 0 0 35.7 64.3 -36.4 27.3









Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



20

40

60

80

100

% of serves


Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



30

35

40

45

50

Expected BP%




5.5.5 Milad Ebadipour (11)




21 19 (90.5%) 4.8 19.0 35.0 56.8 4.8 33.3


Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 2 2 (100%) 0.0 50.0 13.7 72.6 -100.0 50.0

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 0 0

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 18 16 (88.9%) 5.6 11.1 39.3 55.8 22.2 33.3









Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



10

20

30

40

50

% of serves


Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



0

20

40

60

Expected BP%




5.5.6 Grzegorz Łomacz (15)




29 0 6.9 6.9 35.6 61.7 -34.5 48.3

All (with position information) 28 0 7.1 3.6 36.9 61.7 -32.1 50.0

Serves from the left (zones 5/7) 13 0 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 -38.5 38.5

Serves from the centre (zone 6) 14 0 14.3 7.1 42.1 54.7 -21.4 64.3

Serves from the right (zones 9/1) 1 0 0.0 0.0 27.4 72.6 -100.0 0.0









Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



10

15

20

25

30

% of serves


Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789

Receiving team

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

2 3 4

56

789



20

40

60

80

100

Expected BP%




6 Reception‘Exp SO%’ is the expected sideout percentage when a given receiver is passing, based on that receiver’s pass

evaluations and the league-wide SO% for each of those evaluations.

Number Player name N tot SO% tot Eff% tot Exp SO% tot N jump SO% jump Eff% jump Exp SO% jump N other SO% other Eff% other Exp SO% other

7 Bartosz Bednorz 17 52.9 23.5 62.4 11 45.5 9.1 59.6 6 66.7 50.0 67.5

11 Milad Ebadipour 41 61.0 26.8 58.5 13 46.2 -7.7 47.3 28 67.9 42.9 63.8

16 Kacper Piechock 25 68.0 24.0 59.9 14 57.1 21.4 56.2 11 81.8 27.3 64.5

17 Nikolay Penchev 10 80.0 80.0 70.6 2 100.0 100.0 73.4 8 75.0 75.0 69.9

18 Robert Milczare 23 65.2 21.7 59.1 10 60.0 30.0 61.9 13 69.2 15.4 57.0

6.1 Reception evaluation

010203040

N

0

25

50

75

100

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Niko

lay P

ench

ev

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re

Perc

ent

Perfect (#)

Positive

OK (!)

Negative (-)

Poor (/)

Error (=)




6.2 Expected sideout %

010203040

N

0

20

40

60

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Niko

lay P

ench

ev

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re

Expe

cted

SO

%

60.0

62.5

65.0

67.5

70.0SO%

6.3 Reception efficiency(Perfect + positive - errors - overpasses)/(N receptions)

010203040

N

0

20

40

60

80

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Niko

lay P

ench

ev

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re

Eff%

304050607080

Efficiency (%)

6.4 Sideout %(Percentage of points won on reception)




010203040

N

0

20

40

60

80

Barto

sz B

edno

rz

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur

Niko

lay P

ench

ev

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re

SO%

60

70

80SO%

6.5 By serve typeJ = jump serve, F = all other serve types (float/jump-float/standing topspin)

6.5.1 Reception evaluation

0

10

20

N

0

25

50

75

100

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)Ro

bert

Milc

zare

(J)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (J

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (J

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (J

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (J

)

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (J

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)Ni

kolay

Pen

chev

(J)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (J

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (J

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (J

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (J

)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (J

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)M

ilad

Ebad

ipour

(J)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (J

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (J

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (J

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (J

)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (J

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)Ka

cper

Piec

hock

(J)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (J

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (J

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (J

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (J

)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (J

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)Ba

rtosz

Bed

norz

(J)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (J

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (J

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (J

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (J

)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (J

)

Perc

ent

Perfect (#)

Positive

OK (!)

Negative (-)

Poor (/)

Error (=)




6.5.2 Expected sideout %

0

10

20

N

0

20

40

60

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)Ro

bert

Milc

zare

(J)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)Ni

kolay

Pen

chev

(J)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)M

ilad

Ebad

ipour

(J)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)Ka

cper

Piec

hock

(J)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)Ba

rtosz

Bed

norz

(J)

Expe

cted

SO

%

50

55

60

65

70

Expected SO%

6.5.3 Reception efficiency

0

10

20

N

0

25

50

75

100

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)Ro

bert

Milc

zare

(J)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)Ni

kolay

Pen

chev

(J)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)M

ilad

Ebad

ipour

(J)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)Ka

cper

Piec

hock

(J)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)Ba

rtosz

Bed

norz

(J)

Eff%

0

25

50

75

100Efficiency (%)

6.5.4 Sideout %(Percentage of points won on reception)




0

10

20

N

0

25

50

75

100

Robe

rt M

ilcza

re (F

)Ro

bert

Milc

zare

(J)

Niko

lay P

ench

ev (F

)Ni

kolay

Pen

chev

(J)

Mila

d Eb

adipo

ur (F

)M

ilad

Ebad

ipour

(J)

Kacp

er P

iecho

ck (F

)Ka

cper

Piec

hock

(J)

Barto

sz B

edno

rz (F

)Ba

rtosz

Bed

norz

(J)

SO%

50

60

70

80

90

100SO%




6.6 Individual6.6.1 Bartosz Bednorz (7)

Direction Receptions Jump serve

receptions

Expected SO% Eff% Err% SO%

All (potentially including receptions

with missing position information)

17 11 (64.7%) 62.4 23.5 5.9 52.9

All (with position information) 17 11 (64.7%) 62.4 23.5 5.9 52.9

From the receiver’s left 5 2 (40%) 69.8 60.0 0.0 60.0

Straight 5 5 (100%) 48.9 -20.0 20.0 20.0

From the receiver’s right 7 4 (57.1%) 66.7 28.6 0.0 71.4

All receptions with position information (N = 17):

Receptions on serves coming from the receiver’s left (N = 5):

Receptions on serves coming straight (i.e. parallel to the sidelines, N = 5):

Receptions on serves coming from the receiver’s right (N = 7):






receptions




41 13 (31.7%) 58.5 26.8 9.8 61.0


From the receiver’s left 10 8 (80%) 55.3 20.0 10.0 60.0

Straight 14 0 63.6 35.7 0.0 71.4









6.6.3 Kacper Piechocki (16)


receptions




25 14 (56%) 59.9 24.0 8.0 68.0

All (with position information) 25 14 (56%) 59.9 24.0 8.0 68.0

From the receiver’s left 8 7 (87.5%) 65.5 37.5 0.0 62.5

Straight 3 1 (33.3%) 64.2 33.3 0.0 100.0









6.6.4 Nikolay Penchev (17)


receptions




10 2 (20%) 70.6 80 0 80

All (with position information) 10 2 (20%) 70.6 80 0 80

From the receiver’s left 1 1 (100%) 76.6 100 0 100

Straight 1 0 76.6 100 0 100

From the receiver’s right 8 1 (12.5%) 69.1 75 0 75








6.6.5 Robert Milczarek (18)


receptions




23 10 (43.5%) 59.1 21.7 4.3 65.2


From the receiver’s left 9 8 (88.9%) 66.4 44.4 0.0 66.7

Straight 5 2 (40%) 55.9 0.0 0.0 80.0

From the receiver’s right 9 0 53.6 11.1 11.1 55.6








7 Setting7.1 Set distribution: Grzegorz Łomacz7.1.1 On perfect or good reception

17% (N=8)Kill: 75%win: 88%

15% (N=7)Kill: 86%win: 86%

38% (N=18)Kill: 56%win: 61%

15% (N=7)Kill: 71%win: 86%

17% (N=8)Kill: 62%win: 75%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 37.5%16.7% 14.6% 31.2%

Overall: kill 66.7%, point win 75%

15

20

25

30

35

Percent

By rotation

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

50% (N=3)Kill: 33%win: 33%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%16.7% 16.7% 16.7%

Overall: kill 66.7%, point win 66.7%

25% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

12% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

38% (N=3)Kill: 0%

win: 33%

25% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 37.5%25% 12.5% 25%


43% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

43% (N=3)Kill: 67%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 14.3%42.9% 0% 42.9%


11% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

11% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

56% (N=5)Kill: 80%win: 80%

22% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 55.6%11.1% 11.1% 22.2%


11% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

33% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

22% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

33% (N=3)Kill: 67%win: 67%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 22.2%11.1% 33.3% 33.3%


11% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

44% (N=4)Kill: 75%win: 75%

44% (N=4)Kill: 75%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 44.4%0% 11.1% 44.4%


Setter pos: 5 (N = 8) Setter pos: 6 (N = 9) Setter pos: 1 (N = 9)


20

30

40

50

Percent




7.1.2 On OK reception

44% (N=16)Kill: 56%win: 62%

22% (N=8)Kill: 75%win: 88%

11% (N=4)Kill: 75%

win: 100%

22% (N=8)Kill: 50%win: 88%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 22.2%44.4% 0% 33.3%


20

30

40

Percent

By rotation

67% (N=4)Kill: 75%win: 75%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 16.7%66.7% 0% 16.7%


62% (N=5)Kill: 60%win: 80%

12% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

25% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 12.5%62.5% 0% 25%

Overall: kill 50%, point win 87.5%

33% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%33.3% 0% 33.3%


46% (N=5)Kill: 40%win: 40%

18% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

36% (N=4)Kill: 25%win: 75%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 18.2%45.5% 0% 36.4%


20% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

40% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

40% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 40%20% 0% 40%

Overall: kill 80%, point win 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%0% 0% 66.7%




20

30

40

50

60

Percent




7.1.3 On poor reception

54% (N=7)Kill: 29%win: 43%

15% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

8% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

23% (N=3)Kill: 33%win: 67%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 15.4%53.8% 0% 30.8%


10

20

30

40

50

Percent

By rotation

75% (N=3)Kill: 67%win: 67%

25% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%75% 0% 25%


50% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

50% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%50% 0% 50%


67% (N=2)Kill: 0%

win: 50%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%66.7% 0% 0%


33% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

67% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%0% 0% 66.7%


1

234

5 6

7 8 9

100% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%100% 0% 0%




40

60

80

100Percent




7.1.4 With setter call [no setter call] (perfect/good reception only)

100% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%0% 100% 0%


100

Percent

By rotation

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

100% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%0% 100% 0%


1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1

234

5 6

7 8 9



100

Percent




7.1.5 With setter call K1 (perfect/good reception only)

24% (N=8)Kill: 75%win: 88%

12% (N=4)Kill: 100%win: 100%

36% (N=12)Kill: 75%win: 75%

12% (N=4)Kill: 50%win: 75%

15% (N=5)Kill: 40%win: 60%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 36.4%24.2% 12.1% 27.3%


15

20

25

30

35

Percent

By rotation

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%33.3% 33.3% 0%


40% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

20% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

20% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

20% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 20%40% 20% 20%


43% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

43% (N=3)Kill: 67%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 14.3%42.9% 0% 42.9%


14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

71% (N=5)Kill: 80%win: 80%

14% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 71.4%14.3% 0% 14.3%


25% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

50% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

25% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%25% 50% 25%


57% (N=4)Kill: 75%win: 75%

43% (N=3)Kill: 67%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 57.1%0% 0% 42.9%




20

30

40

50

60

70Percent




7.1.6 With setter call K7 (perfect/good reception only)

10% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

50% (N=5)Kill: 20%win: 40%

20% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

20% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%0% 10% 40%


10

20

30

40

50Percent

By rotation

100% (N=2)Kill: 0%win: 0%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 100%0% 0% 0%


50% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

50% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%0% 0% 50%


1

234

5 6

7 8 9

100% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%0% 0% 100%


20% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

40% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

40% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 40%0% 20% 40%


1

234

5 6

7 8 9



20

40

60

80

100Percent




7.1.7 With setter call KE (perfect/good reception only)No data.

7.1.8 Setter shifted to 2 (perfect (#)/good (+)/OK (!) reception only)(‘Shifted to 2’means that the pass went to zone 2 and the setter sets from there.)

34% (N=13)Kill: 69%win: 69%

5% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

29% (N=11)Kill: 64%win: 82%

13% (N=5)Kill: 40%win: 80%

18% (N=7)Kill: 57%win: 86%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 28.9%34.2% 5.3% 31.6%


10

15

20

25

30

Percent

By rotation

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 66.7%33.3% 0% 0%


44% (N=4)Kill: 100%win: 100%

11% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

22% (N=2)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

22% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 22.2%44.4% 11.1% 22.2%


50% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

25% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

25% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 25%50% 0% 25%


46% (N=5)Kill: 40%win: 40%

27% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

27% (N=3)Kill: 33%win: 67%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 27.3%45.5% 0% 27.3%


14% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

57% (N=4)Kill: 50%win: 75%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 14.3%14.3% 14.3% 57.1%


50% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

50% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%0% 0% 50%




20

30

40

50

60

Percent




7.1.9 Setter shifted to 4 (perfect (#)/good (+)/OK (!) reception only)(‘Shifted to 4’means that the pass went to zones 4, 3C, or 3D and the setter sets from there.)

20% (N=3)Kill: 67%win: 67%

13% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

20% (N=3)Kill: 33%win: 33%

13% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=5)Kill: 60%win: 80%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 20%20% 13.3% 46.7%

Overall: kill 60%, point win 66.7%

15

20

25

30

Percent

By rotation

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%0% 0% 66.7%


20% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

40% (N=2)Kill: 0%win: 0%

40% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 40%20% 0% 40%


100% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%100% 0% 0%


33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

33% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%33.3% 33.3% 33.3%


1

234

5 6

7 8 9

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%0% 33.3% 66.7%




20

40

60

80

100Percent




7.1.10 In transition (perfect/good dig only)

15% (N=3)Kill: 33%

win: 100%

25% (N=5)Kill: 80%win: 80%

50% (N=10)Kill: 60%win: 90%

5% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

5% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%15% 25% 10%


10

20

30

40

50Percent

By rotation

33% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

67% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 66.7%0% 33.3% 0%


17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

50% (N=3)Kill: 33%

win: 100%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%16.7% 16.7% 16.7%


33% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 66.7%33.3% 0% 0%


33% (N=1)Kill: 0%

win: 100%

67% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 66.7%33.3% 0% 0%


50% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

50% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 0%0% 50% 50%


67% (N=2)Kill: 100%win: 100%

33% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 33.3%0% 66.7% 0%




20

30

40

50

60

Percent




7.1.11 In crunch time (perfect/good reception only)Crunch time is defined as:

• in sets 1-4: scores of 18-18 or higher, and a margin of two points or less (e.g. scores of 18-20 or 23-22 are

crunch time, but 16-18 and 18-21 are not)

• in sets 5: scores of 8-8 or higher, and a margin of two points or less (e.g. scores of 11-10 or 9-11 are

crunch time, but 13-9 is not).

17% (N=8)Kill: 75%win: 88%

15% (N=7)Kill: 86%win: 86%

38% (N=18)Kill: 56%win: 61%

15% (N=7)Kill: 71%win: 86%

17% (N=8)Kill: 62%win: 75%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 37.5%16.7% 14.6% 31.2%


15

20

25

30

35

Percent

By rotation

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

50% (N=3)Kill: 33%win: 33%

17% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 50%16.7% 16.7% 16.7%


25% (N=2)Kill: 50%

win: 100%

12% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

38% (N=3)Kill: 0%

win: 33%

25% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 37.5%25% 12.5% 25%


43% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

14% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

43% (N=3)Kill: 67%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 14.3%42.9% 0% 42.9%


11% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

11% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

56% (N=5)Kill: 80%win: 80%

22% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 55.6%11.1% 11.1% 22.2%


11% (N=1)Kill: 0%win: 0%

33% (N=3)Kill: 100%win: 100%

22% (N=2)Kill: 50%win: 50%

33% (N=3)Kill: 67%win: 67%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 22.2%11.1% 33.3% 33.3%


11% (N=1)Kill: 100%win: 100%

44% (N=4)Kill: 75%win: 75%

44% (N=4)Kill: 75%

win: 100%

1

234

5 6

7 8 9

1T 44.4%0% 11.1% 44.4%




20

30

40

50

Percent




8 Attack8.1 All attacks

Number Player name N attacks N kills N errs N blocked Kill % Err % Block % Rally win % Eff %

1 Srecko Lisinac 21 11 3 3 52.4 14.3 14.3 61.9 23.8

2 Mariusz Wlazły 43 19 5 5 44.2 11.6 11.6 62.8 20.9

6 Karol Kłos 5 4 1 0 80.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 60.0

7 Bartosz Bednorz 46 28 3 6 60.9 6.5 13.0 69.6 41.3

9 Patryk Czarnowski 18 8 2 1 44.4 11.1 5.6 72.2 27.8

11 Milad Ebadipour 27 15 3 1 55.6 11.1 3.7 74.1 40.7

13 Szymon Romac 3 1 0 0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3

14 Aleksandar Nedeljkovic 1 1 0 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

17 Nikolay Penchev 11 6 0 2 54.5 0.0 18.2 72.7 36.4

8.2 Reception attack


1 Srecko Lisinac 17 10 3 3 58.8 17.6 17.6 64.7 23.5

2 Mariusz Wlazły 28 13 3 3 46.4 10.7 10.7 67.9 25.0

6 Karol Kłos 2 2 0 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

7 Bartosz Bednorz 29 17 2 5 58.6 6.9 17.2 69.0 34.5


11 Milad Ebadipour 16 10 2 0 62.5 12.5 0.0 75.0 50.0

13 Szymon Romac 3 1 0 0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3

14 Aleksandar Nedeljkovic 1 1 0 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0

17 Nikolay Penchev 3 2 0 1 66.7 0.0 33.3 66.7 33.3

8.2.1 Reception attack after own reception


1 Srecko Lisinac 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 100.0 0.0 -100

2 Mariusz Wlazły 1 1 0 0 100.0 0 0.0 100.0 100

7 Bartosz Bednorz 6 4 0 1 66.7 0 16.7 66.7 50

11 Milad Ebadipour 4 2 0 0 50.0 0 0.0 75.0 50

17 Nikolay Penchev 2 1 0 1 50.0 0 50.0 50.0 0

8.3 Transition attack


1 Srecko Lisinac 4 1 0 0 25.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 25.0

2 Mariusz Wlazły 15 6 2 2 40.0 13.3 13.3 53.3 13.3

6 Karol Kłos 3 2 1 0 66.7 33.3 0.0 66.7 33.3

7 Bartosz Bednorz 17 11 1 1 64.7 5.9 5.9 70.6 52.9


11 Milad Ebadipour 11 5 1 1 45.5 9.1 9.1 72.7 27.3

17 Nikolay Penchev 8 4 0 1 50.0 0.0 12.5 75.0 37.5




8.4 Middle attackThis section gives an indication of the contribution that middles make to their team in attack. The values given

here are for team attack outcomes when the middle player in question is front row. They are based on attacks

by all players on the team, not the just the attacks of the middle player in question. See the key at the end of

this report for a full explanation of the columns, but briefly rec att is reception attack, att% is attack killpercentage, R#+ is perfect or good reception, trans att is transition attack, and BP is breakpoint phase (theteam is serving).

8.4.1 Reception attack

Number Player name N rec att rec att% SO% N rec att R#+ rec att% R#+ SO% R#+

1 Srecko Lisinac 52 57.7 69.2 26 69.2 73.1

6 Karol Kłos 11 63.6 72.7 4 75.0 100.0

9 Patryk Czarnowski 45 51.1 66.7 19 63.2 73.7

14 Aleksandar Nedeljkovic 2 50.0 100.0 1 100.0 100.0

8.4.2 Transition attack

Number Player name N trans att trans att% trans win% N trans att BP trans att% BP BP%

1 Srecko Lisinac 26 46.2 65.4 19 31.6 52.6

6 Karol Kłos 9 55.6 77.8 7 57.1 85.7

9 Patryk Czarnowski 28 50.0 67.9 20 55.0 70.0

14 Aleksandar Nedeljkovic 2 50.0 50.0 1 0.0 0.0

8.5 Attack chartsOnly attackers with at least 15 attacks in total are shown in this section.

Note that each table below is based on all attacks with the given attack code. However, the charts do not show

all attacks.

The charts only show attacks that had an outcome of: Kills, Other errors, All other attacks. Not included in the

charts are attacks with outcome: Blocked attacks, Errors into net.

8.5.1 Srecko Lisinac (1)

Attack code X1

N 4

Kill % 100%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 100%

Rec att kill % 100%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

30 40 50 60 70% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789 Attack code X7

N 4

Kill % 25%

Error % 25%

Blocked % 50%

Eff % -50%

Rec att kill % 25%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

100% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789




Attack code XC

N 7

Kill % 71.4%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 71.4%

Rec att kill % 83.3%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

15 20 25% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789

8.5.2 Mariusz Wlazły (2)

Attack code X5

N 1

Kill % 0%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 100%

Eff % -100%

Rec att kill % 0%

% Hard spikes 0%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 100%

1

2 3 4

56

789 Attack code X6

N 19

Kill % 42.1%

Error % 10.5%

Blocked % 15.8%

Eff % 15.8%


% Hard spikes 89.5%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 10.5%

10 15 20 25% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789

Attack code X8

N 14

Kill % 64.3%

Error % 14.3%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 50%


% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

10 20 30 40 50% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789




8.5.3 Bartosz Bednorz (7)

Attack code X5

N 31

Kill % 61.3%

Error % 6.5%

Blocked % 12.9%

Eff % 41.9%


% Hard spikes 87.1%

% Soft spikes 3.2%

% Tips 9.7%

10 15 20 25% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789 Attack code V5

N 6

Kill % 16.7%

Error % 16.7%

Blocked % 33.3%

Eff % -33.3%

Rec att kill % 0%

% Hard spikes 83.3%

% Soft spikes 16.7%

% Tips 0%

100% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789

Attack code XP

N 7

Kill % 85.7%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 85.7%

Rec att kill % 100%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%


1

2 3 4

56

789

8.5.4 Patryk Czarnowski (9)

Attack code X1

N 2

Kill % 50%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 50%

Rec att kill % 100%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

50% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789 Attack code X7

N 6

Kill % 66.7%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 66.7%


% Hard spikes 83.3%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 16.7%


1

2 3 4

56

789

Attack code XC

N 8

Kill % 37.5%

Error % 12.5%

Blocked % 12.5%

Eff % 12.5%

Rec att kill % 40%

% Hard spikes 75%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 25%


1

2 3 4

56

789





Attack code X5

N 9

Kill % 33.3%

Error % 11.1%

Blocked % 11.1%

Eff % 11.1%

Rec att kill % 50%

% Hard spikes 66.7%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 33.3%

25.027.530.032.535.037.5% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789 Attack code V5

N 6

Kill % 50%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 50%


% Hard spikes 50%

% Soft spikes 33.3%

% Tips 16.7%

20 30 40 50% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789

Attack code X6

N 6

Kill % 83.3%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 83.3%


% Hard spikes 83.3%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 16.7%


1

2 3 4

56

789

Attack code XP

N 4

Kill % 100%

Error % 0%

Blocked % 0%

Eff % 100%

Rec att kill % 100%

% Hard spikes 100%

% Soft spikes 0%

% Tips 0%

30 40 50 60 70% of attacks

1

2 3 4

56

789




9 Blocking9.1 All players

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

aA 154 62 12 59 0 0 29 38 41 26 10

aA% 49.4 54.8 41.7 44.1 58.6 44.7 43.9 42.3 40.0

aAeff 37.0 43.5 41.7 25.4 51.7 28.9 31.7 38.5 10.0

won 32.6 25.5 45.5 40.4 25.0 37.8 31.4 27.3 55.6

BP_won 31.8 25.5 44.4 37.8 25.0 32.3 29.6 25.0 55.6

indiv_B% 3.2 0.0 6.8 6.9 5.3 2.4 0.0 0.0

tot att B% 7.1 4.8 0.0 13.6 6.9 10.5 4.9 0.0 20.0

rec aA% 50.5 51.1 44.4 50.0 57.1 59.3 40.7 52.9 37.5

9.2 By attack codeX1 TEAM

Srecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 12 3 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 0

% 41.7 33.3 37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0

eff 25.0 33.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 -100.0

part% 75.0 100.0 0.0 14.3 20.0 20.0 0.0

N blockers 1.1

X5 TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 38 11 6 14 0 0 18 19 0 0 0

% 57.9 72.7 50.0 42.9 55.6 57.9

eff 42.1 72.7 50.0 0.0 44.4 36.8

part% 84.6 75.0 82.4 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

N blockers 1.8

V5 TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 22 5 2 15 0 0 9 13 11 5 0

% 36.4 60.0 0.0 33.3 55.6 23.1 36.4 40.0

eff 31.8 60.0 0.0 26.7 55.6 15.4 27.3 40.0

part% 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 91.7 55.6 0.0

N blockers 2.7

X6 TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 19 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 3 2

% 42.1 60.0 50.0 50.0 33.3 0.0

eff 31.6 40.0 50.0 35.7 33.3 0.0

part% 76.9 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

N blockers 1.7

X7 TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 3 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

% 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

eff 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

part% 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 0.0

N blockers 1.7




X8 TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 16 8 1 6 0 0 0 0 4 7 5

% 56.2 62.5 100.0 50.0 75.0 57.1 40.0

eff 37.5 37.5 100.0 33.3 50.0 57.1 0.0

part% 88.9 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

N blockers 1.9

XC TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1

% 14.3 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0

eff 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

part% 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 25.0

N blockers 1.4

XP TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Grzegorz

Łomacz

Mariusz

Wlazły

Bartosz

Bednorz

Milad

Ebadipour

Nikolay

Penchev

TOT 7 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0

% 71.4 60.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

eff 71.4 60.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

part% 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 50.0 0.0

N blockers 1.6




9.3 Middle blocking

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

Rallies won 32.6 25.5 45.5 40.4

BP% 31.8 25.5 44.4 37.8

BP%

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

BP% 31.8 25.5 44.4 37.8

BP% R#+ 30.8 23.1 50.0 40.0

BP% R# 25.0 20.0 40.0

BP% R+ 33.3 25.0 50.0 40.0

BP% R! 29.6 22.2 33.3 40.0

BLOCK %

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

B#% ind 3.2 0.0 6.8

B#% team 7.1 4.8 0.0 13.6

ALL OPPOSITION ATTACK

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

aA 154 62 12 59 0 0

aA% 49.4 54.8 41.7 44.1

aA% HB 35.1 42.9 0.0 36.8

aA% FB 53.4 65.5 57.1 45.8

aA% 1T 44.4 36.4 0.0 46.2

OPPOSITION RECEPTION ATTACK

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

rec aA 107 45 9 42 0 0

rec aA% 50.5 51.1 44.4 50.0

rec aA% HB 42.1 42.9 0.0 50.0

rec aA% FB 54.5 56.5 60.0 55.6

rec aA% 1T 41.7 40.0 0.0 41.7

rec aA% R# 50.0 55.6 40.0

rec aA% R+ 44.4 37.5 50.0 50.0

rec aA% R! 59.3 66.7 66.7 50.0

rec aA% R- 50.0 54.5 25.0 53.8




OPPOSITION TRANSITION ATTACK

TEAMSrecko

Lisinac

Karol

Kłos

Patryk

Czarnowski

Szymon

Romac

Aleksandar

Nedeljkovic

trans aA 47 17 3 17 0 0

trans aA% 46.8 64.7 33.3 29.4

trans aA% HB 27.8 42.9 0.0 22.2

trans aA% FB 50.0 100.0 50.0 16.7

trans aA% 1T 66.7 0.0 100.0




10 Keys10.1 Worksheet keySideoutsStatistic Explanation

N OPP SRV Number of serves by the opposition

SO Number of sideouts (points won on reception)

SO% Sideout percentage (percentage of points won on reception)

OPP SRV ERRS Number of serve errors made by the opposition

OPP SRV ERR% Opposition serve error percentage

mod SO% Modified sideout percentage (sideout percentage excluding serve errors)

EXP SO% The expected sideout rate based on the receiver’s pass ratings and the

dataset-wide sideout rates by rating. For example, ’perfect’ receptions might

correspond to a dataset-wide sideout rate of 0.7, and ’poor’ to 0.4. If a given

receiver had one ’perfect’ reception and one ’poor’ one, their expected sideout

rate would be 0.55.

Reception

Statistic Explanation

N Number of serve receptions

%PERF Percentage of serve receptions rated as perfect

%POS+PERF Percentage of serve receptions rated as perfect or positive

%ERR Reception error percentage

%POOR Percentage of serve receptions rated as poor

EFF Serve reception efficiency [(number of receptions rated perfect or positive -

number of errors - number of receptions rated negative)/(number of

receptions)]

EFF J Reception efficiency on jump serves

EFF F Reception efficiency on float/jump-float serves

Reception attack


N Number of attacks during serve reception phase

KILL% Attack kill percentage

EFF Attack efficiency [(number of kills - number of errors and blocked

attacks)/(number of attacks)]

TOT All receptions

REC #+!-/ receptions rated as perfect/positive/ok (no first tempo attack

possible)/negative/poor (no attack possible)




Reception sideout


SO% TOT Overall sideout percentage

SO% JUMP Sideout percentage on jump serves

SO% FLOAT Sideout percentage on float/jump-float serves

First ball sideoutStatistic Explanation

FBSO% TOT Attack kill percentage on first-ball attacks (attacks on serve reception)

FBSO% JUMP First-ball sideout percentage on jump serves

FBSO% FLOAT First-ball sideout percentage on float/jump-float serves

OPP FBSO% TOT The opposition’s first-ball sideout percentage

Breakpoints


N Number of serve attempts

BP Number of breakpoints (points won on serve)

BP% Breakpoint percentage (percentage of serves won)

BP% JUMP Breakpoint percentage on jump serves

BP% FLOAT Breakpoint percentage on float/jump-float serves

mod BP% Modified breakpoint percentage (breakpoint percentage excluding serve errors

and aces)

EXP BP% The expected breakpoint rate based on the server’s serve ratings and the

dataset-wide breakpoint rates by rating. For example, ’negative’ serves might

correspond to a dataset-wide breakpoint rate of 0.3, and an ace to 1.0. If a given

server had one ’negative’ serve and one ace, their expected breakpoint rate

would be 0.65.

EXP OPP SO% The expected opposition sideout rate. (This is effectively the same as 100-(EXP

BP%), but excluding serve errors).

SRV ERRS Number of serve errors

ACES Number of serve aces

ACE% Percentage of serves that were aces

BlockStatistic Explanation

BLOCKS Number of points won with block kills

BLOCK% Block kills as a percentage of the number of attacks




AttackStatistic Explanation

TOT All attacks

TRANS Transition attacks

N Number of attacks

KILL% Attack kill percentage

EFF Attack efficiency [(number of kills - number of errors and blocked

attacks)/(number of attacks)]

ATT/D Number of attacks as a percentage of defensive opportunities

K/D Number of attack kills as a percentage of defensive opportunities

Scoring by rotation (including serve errors)


OPP N SRV Number of serves attempted by the opposition

SO Number of sideouts (points won on reception)

SO% Sideout percentage (percentage of points won on reception)

mod SO% Modified sideout percentage (sideout percentage excluding serve errors)

N SRV Number of serve attempts

BP Number of breakpoints (points won on serve)

BP% Breakpoint percentage (percentage of serves won)

P1/P2/etc Setter in position 1/2/etc

FreeballsStatistic Explanation

N Number of freeballs received

KILL% Percentage of freeballs on which an attack kill was made

WON Number of freeball points won

%WON Percentage of freeball points won

TOT All freeballs

F# Freeballs rated as perfect

F+ Freeballs rated as positive

Errors and points won


ERRS Number of errors made (attack, serve, set, freeball errors plus block net

touches)

ERRS/100 Number of errors made per 100 rallies

ERRS2/100 Number of errors made (excluding serve errors) per 100 rallies

PTS Number of points won (serve aces plus block and attack kills)

PTS/100 Number of points won per 100 rallies




10.2 Attacking key10.2.1 Middle attackers


N rec att Number of reception attacks by the team when this player was front row

rec att% Team reception attack kill percentage when this player was front row

SO% Sideout percentage when this player was front row

N rec att R#+ As for ’N rec att’ but only on good or perfect reception

rec att% R#+ As for ’rec att%’ but only on good or perfect reception

SO% R#+ As for ’SO%’ but only on good or perfect reception

N trans att Number of transition attacks by the team when this player was front row

trans att% Team transition attack kill percentage when this player was front row

trans win% Percentage of points won when a transition attack was made (by any player on

the team) and this player was front row

N trans att BP As for ’N trans att’ but only in breakpoint phase (i.e. the team was serving)

trans att% BP As for ’trans att%’ but only in breakpoint phase (i.e. the team was serving)

BP% The percentage of points won on serve when this player was front row

10.3 Blocking key


aA Number of opposition attacks against this blocker

aA% Opposition attack kill percentage against this blocker

aAeff Opposition attack efficiency against this blocker

won Of the rallies during which the opposition attacked against this blocker, the

percentage of rallies won by the blocking team

BP_won As for ’won’ but only including rallies during which the blocking team was

serving

indiv_B% Block kills made by this individual blocker (i.e. block kills credited to this

individual) as a percentage of opposition attacks against this blocker

tot att B% Block kills (regardless of whether the kill was made by this individual player or

the other blocking players) as a percentage of opposition attacks against this

blocker

rec aA% Opposition reception attack (the first attack directly after receiving serve) kill

percentage against this blocker

10.3.1 By attack code/zone


TOT_XX Total number of attacks of type XX against this blocker

XX% Attack percentage of TOT_XX attacks against this blocker

XXeff Attack efficiency of TOT_XX attacks against this blocker

XXpart% Percentage of opposition XX attacks in which this blocker participated in the

block

XX N blockers Average number of blockers against each opposition XX attack




10.3.2 Middle blocking


Rallies won Of the rallies during which the opposition attacked against this blocker, the

percentage of rallies won by the blocking team

BP% As for ’Rallies won’ but only including rallies during which the blocking team was

serving

BP% Rxx As for ’BP%’, but where the reception evaluation code was xx

B#% ind Block kills made by this individual blocker (i.e. block kills credited to this

individual) as a percentage of opposition attacks against this blocker

B#% team Block kills (regardless of whether the kill was made by this individual player or

the other blocking players) as a percentage of opposition attacks against this

blocker

aA Number of opposition attacks against this blocker

aA% Opposition attack kill percentage against this blocker

aA% HB/FB/1T Opposition attack kill percentage for high ball/fast ball/first tempo attacks

against this blocker

rec aA Number of opposition reception attacks (the first attack directly after receiving

serve) against this blocker

rec aA% Opposition reception attack kill percentage against this blocker

rec aA% HB/FB/1T Opposition reception attack kill percentage for high ball/fast ball/first tempo

attacks against this blocker

rec aA% Rxx Opposition reception attack kill percentage against this blocker where the

reception evaluation code was xx

trans aA Number of opposition transition attacks against this blocker

trans aA% Opposition transition attack kill percentage against this blocker

trans aA% HB/FB/1T Opposition transition attack kill percentage for high ball/fast ball/first tempo

attacks against this blocker




11 Settings used for this reportReport generated on: 2020-05-11

Player roles from: Fixed rotation (S-H-M)

ServingMinimum number of serves required for a player to be included: 10

Serve position data from: Guess

Generate individual serve charts? Yes

ReceptionMinimum number of receptions required for a player to be included: 5

Reception position data from: Guess

Generate individual reception charts? Yes

SettingSetters reported on: Grzegorz Łomacz

Include set distribution by setter calls? Yes

Report on individual setters? Yes

AttackMinimum number of attacks required for a player to have charts shown: 15

Attack chart style: Cones

Attack codes shown on charts: X1, X5, V5, X6, X7, X8, XC, XP

Attack codes excluded from charts:

Attacks to show on charts: Kills, Other errors, All other attacks

Attack types shown on charts: Hard spikes, Soft spikes, Tips

BlockingNumber of blockers from: Scouted number of blockers

Report on attacks by: Attack code

Attack codes to report on: X1, X5, V5, X6, X7, X8, XC, XP



Team report: PGE Skra Bełchatów - Untan · Via Teamreport:PGESkraBełchatow´ 2020-05-11 Contents...

Documents

Transcript of Team report: PGE Skra Bełchatów - Untan · Via Teamreport:PGESkraBełchatow´ 2020-05-11 Contents...