Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr....

58
Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. Warkentin Dec. 4 th 2012 SOLO SOCCER TRAINER

Transcript of Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr....

Page 1: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University

Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. Warkentin Dec. 4th 2012

SOLO SOCCER TRAINER

Page 2: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

2Navigation

2

Introduction Project Background Not your average Launching Machine

Requirements

Criteria Initial Velocity Angles

Testing Phase One: Compression

Phase Two: Deformation

Analysis Compression Functions Energy Balance

Design Final Design Mechanical Electrical Safety

Conclusion Budget Further Considerations

AGENDA

Page 3: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

3Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

3

TEAM ROSTER

NADA EL SAYED

Born: April 1, 1991

From: Port Said

Height: 5"10

Position: Striker

KEVIN BOUTILIER

Born: Nov. 12, 1989 From:

Williamwood Height:

6"1 Position:

Goalie

GREG PELLY Born: Oct. 10,

1989From:

Antigonish Height:

5"7 Position: Sweeper

JUSTIN COLWILL

Born: Apr 30 1990

From: L-town Height:

6“2 Position: Midfield

Page 4: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

4Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

4

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Oldest & Universal Sport

3.5 Billion Fans

Vital Component

Ref: 1,2,3

Page 5: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

5Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

o Penalty kick stat:

Only 12% goalie save rate!

Our project will attempt to aid in the solo soccer

training process to improve the chances of successfully saving a

goal.

5

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Ref: 4

Page 6: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

6Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

6

HOW’S IT DIFFERENT??

o Many “sports” machines.

Ref: 5,6,7

Page 7: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

7Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

7

HOW’S IT DIFFERENT??

o Many “sports” machines.o Previous design projects.

Ref: 8,9

Page 8: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

8Navigation

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

8

o Many “sports” machines.o Previous design projects.

Differences: Largest object launched Only the goalie Randomized Automatic Self Feed

HOW’S IT DIFFERENT??

Ref: 10

Page 9: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

9

Intro Requirements Testing Analysis Design Conclusion

Page 10: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

10

IntroRequiremen

tsTesting Analysis Design Conclusio

n

Navigation

10

CRITERIAo The device should be able to launch the soccer ball into 5 set launch points (top left, top right, bottom left, bottom right and center).

oThe device should be able to launch a soccer ball to a random order of set points.

Page 11: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

11

IntroRequiremen

tsTesting Analysis Design Conclusio

n

Navigation

11

CRITERIAo The device should be able to launch a soccer ball to a random order of set points.

o The device should be able to launch the soccer ball into 5 set launch points (top left, top right, bottom left, bottom right and center).

o The device should be able to launch from the penalty line—36 ft (11 m) from net.

36 ft

Page 12: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

12

IntroRequiremen

tsTesting Analysis Design Conclusio

n

Navigation

12

o The device should be able to launch a soccer ball in a random manner.

o The device should be able to launch the soccer ball into 5 set launch points (top left, top right, bottom left, bottom right and center).

o The device should be able to launch from the penalty line—36 ft (11 m) from net.

oThe device should be able to be set up by a single person.

oThe device should be transportable by truck and movable a single person.

oThe cost to build device should be no more than $2000 CND.

oThe device should operate at a reasonable shot interval of no more than 20 seconds.

oThe device should be safe.

CRITERIA

Page 13: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

13

IntroRequiremen

tsTesting Analysis Design Conclusio

n

Navigation

13

Top Corners:V =19 m/sθ = 17°

Bottom Corners:V =18 m/sθ = 5° Side view

VELOCITIES & ANGLES

Page 14: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

14

IntroRequiremen

tsTesting Analysis Design Conclusio

n

Navigation

14

VELOCITIES & ANGLES

36 ft

Top View

18° 18°

Page 15: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

15Navigation

TIMEOUT: GENERAL DESIGN IDEA

Soccer Ball

Dual Spinning

Disks

Page 16: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

TESTING

16

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Page 17: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

17

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

17

Instron Machine

Measure Compression

Normal Force

PHASE ONE: COMPRESSION

Page 18: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

18

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00%0

2

4

6

8

10

12

f(x) = NaN x + NaNR² = 0

% Ball Compression vs. FN

Compression (%)

FN (

N)

18

PHASE ONE: COMPRESSION

18

Page 19: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

19

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

PHASE TWO: DEFORMATION

Page 20: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

20

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

Fpull

Ffriction

Fdeformation

(μs + κ)FN ≈ Ffriction + Fdeformation = Fpull

PHASE TWO: DEFORMATION

Page 21: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

21

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

f(x) = 10028.5640387728 x² + 870.951979747877 x − 10.018551830704R² = 0.970400396853243

Deformation Force vs. Ball Compression

Exper-imental DataPolynomial (Experi-mental Data)

Compression (%)

Fdefr

om

ati

on (

N)

PHASE TWO: DEFORMATION

Page 22: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

22Navigation

Fdeformation ≈ function of the

shapes.

Ffriction ≈ function of materials.

FBD of kinetic system

TIMEOUT: DEFORMATION

RELATION

Page 23: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

ANALYSIS

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Page 24: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

24

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

DEAD CENTRE FBD

Fdeformation

Fkinetic

Fthrust = Fcoulomb + Fviscous

=βV

Page 25: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

25

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

-15

-25

Friction vs. Velocity Model

FcoulombFviscousFtotal

Velocity (m/s)

Fri

ctio

n F

orc

e (

N)

FRICTION & VELOCITY

β slope

Ref 11 : US Dept of Transportation: Friction: Analytical and Field Investigation

Page 26: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

26

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

∑Fthrust = ∑ Fcoloumb + ∑ Fviscous + ∑ Fdeformation

ΔW ba l l on t i re = – ΔW t i re on ba l l

Deformation Force

Coulomb Friction Force

Contact Distance

FORCES & WORK

Page 27: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

27

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

ω i = 960 rpm

Vthrust = 20.5 m/s@ 18% Compression

REQUIRED RPM

Page 28: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

DESIGN

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

MECHANICAL

Page 29: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

29

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

FINAL DESIGN

• Frame 1.5x1.5x.188 steel or

aluminum tubing

• Wheels

• Overall Dimensions: LxWxH

48"x40"x27"

• Motors

• Actuators

• Feed Mechanism

• Mobility Locking Wheels

Page 30: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

30

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

 

MECHANICAL : TIRES

• Cheap energy storage• Radius effects width• Radius/Mass effect energy

𝐸=12𝐼 𝜔2

𝐼=𝑚𝑟2

2

• Rated at our speeds• Opportunity for tuning

Ref: 12

Page 31: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

31

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

• Energy source• Shot recovery• Launch speed• 2 Motors (Spin?)

• AC (Plug In)• Electrically Reversible

(VFD)• 0-1800 RPM • 0.5HP

MECHANICAL : MOTORS

Ref: 13

Page 32: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

32

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

MECHANICAL : ACTUATORS

Stroke

9”

Pitch

0° to 20°

Stroke

12”

Yaw

-23° to +23°

Page 33: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

33

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

MECHANICAL : FEED

• Gear Motor• Lead Screw• Rail Design• Slider

Page 34: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

DESIGN

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

ELECTRICAL & CONTROL

Page 35: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

35

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

CONTROL SYSTEM

Page 36: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

36Navigation

RANDOMLY SELECT

TARGET ON NET

MEASURE EXTENDED

LENGTH (PITCH ANGLE)

MEASURE EXTENDED

LENGTH (YAW ANGLE)

PARAMETER LOOK-UP TABLE:

LAUNCH MOTOR SPEEDYAW ACTUATOR LENGTH

PITCH ACTUATOR LENGTH

COMPARE ACTUAL

EXTENDED LENGTH TO

DESIRED VALUE(PITCH ANGLE)

MICROCONTROLLER LOGIC

OUTPUTS TO DRIVER SYSTEMS

SET LAUNCH MOTORS ANGULAR

VELOCITIES

SET YAW ACTUATOR EXTENDED

LENGTH

SET PITCH ACTUATOR EXTENDED

LENGTH

ENGAGE LOADING

MECHANISM(LEAD

SCREW)

SINGLE BALL IS

LAUNCHED

RETURN TO

START

START

COMPARE ACTUAL

EXTENDED LEGNTH TO

DESIRED VALUE(YAW ANGLE)

Page 37: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

37

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

CONTROL FEEDBACK

Page 38: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

38

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS

• Emergency Stop.

• Safe Guarding.

- Tire Enclosure

- Electrical Enclosure

Ref: 14

Page 39: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

39

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

ELECTRICAL  

Part Unit Cost Quantity Total CostAC Motor VFD $120.00 2 $ 240.00

1/2 HP AC Motors $100.00 2 $ 200.00

10 A DC Motor Driver $15.00 3 $ 45.00

Arduino Due Microcontroller $50.00 1 $ 50.00

IR Distance Sensor $15.00 3 $ 45.00

Desktop PC Power Supply $50.00 1 $ 50.00

DIN Rail $10.00 1 $ 10.00

1/100 HP Gear Motor $50.00 1 $ 50.00

Electrical Enclosure $ 75.00 1 $ 75.00

Assorted Electrical Components

$ 150.00 1 $ 150.00

ELECTRICAL TOTAL

(with tax)

$ 1052.25

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

ConclusionBUDGET: ELECTRICAL

Page 40: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

40

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

MECHANICAL      

Part Unit Cost Quantity Total CostGear Motor Loan 1 $ 0.00

12" Stroke Linear Actuator Loan 1 $ 0.009" Stroke Linear Actuator Loan 1 $ 0.0016" Drive Wheels $ 40.00 2 $ 80.00 Heavy Duty Turn Table (non-lockable)

$ 65.00 1 $ 65.00

Mobility Tires $ 17.00 4 $ 68.00 Assorted Hardware $ 120.00 1 $ 120.00 Lead Screw $ 12.00 1 $ 12.00 1.50" x 1.50" x 1/8" Square Tubing

$ 47.00 2 $ 94.00

Frame Paint $10.00 1 $ 10.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL

(with tax)$ 516.35

Grand Total (with shipping) $ 1803.89

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

ConclusionBUDGET: MECHANICAL

Page 41: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

41

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

- FEM Analysis.

- Building.

- Physical Testing.

-Practise, Practise, Practise!

FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Ref: 4

Page 42: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

42

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

- One of a kind device.

- No need for “extra” user.

-Random

-Automatic

-Self Feed

- Ample initial testing.

- Great challenge for the winter!

- Website & Contacthttp://poisson.me.dal.ca/~dp_12_16/

SUMMARY

Page 43: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

THANKS TO :

Mechanical Engineering DepartmentShell CanadaDr. Militzer

Dr. Warkentin

Page 44: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

SPECIAL THANKS TO :

Dr. Bauer Blair Nickerson

Jesse KeanePeter Jones

John Macdonald

Page 45: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

45

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Navigation

1. http://multipletext.com/2011/8-soccer-in-ancient-

china.htm

2. http://soccerstl.net/2012/09/28/slu-billikens-host-

uca-for-homecoming-saturday/slu-billikens-

soccer-fans/

3. http://tallhorsewines.wordpress.com/

2010/04/21/soccer-goalies-should-wear-red/

4. http://www.footy.dk/2012/09/26/video-arets-

redning/soccer-goalie-trying-to-block-goal/

5. http://www.justbaseball.us/Qstore/Qstore.cgi?

CMD=011&PROD=1129084852

6. http://www.sports-inter.com/en/football/jugs-

football-machine-6662.details.html

7. http://www.fitness-sports.co.uk/tennis/TENNIS-

TNTM-2.html

8. http://poisson.me.dal.ca/~dp_11_02/

9. http://poisson.me.dal.ca/~dp_08_06/

10. http://www.academy.com/webapp/wcs/stores/

servlet/Product_10151_10051_347881_-1

11. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/

infrastructure/bridge/05083/appendf.cfm

12. http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/4/Auto/

Towing/TrailerTires.jsp

13. http://www.gallantmotor.com/acvsdc

14. http://banat4today.blogspot.ca/2011/09/boys-will-

be-boys.html

15. http://www.cox.com/support/cable/

nopic_gothere.asp

16. http://www.google.com.ng/local/trader/listing/-/

6ad652a88a7f42ec/_b7b61055202e8df1_

REFERENCES

Page 46: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

QUESTIONS?

Page 47: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

47

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

IntroductionProject Background (#4&5)

Not your average Launching Machine (#8)

RequirementsCriteria (#10-12)

Initial Velocity & Angles (#13 &14)

TestingPhase One: Compression (#16 &17)

Phase Two: Deformation (#18-20)

Friction (#25)

Backup Slides

AnalysisKinetic FBD (#22-24)

Energy Balance (#26-27)

DesignFinal Design (#29)

Mechanical (#30 - 33)

Electrical (#34 - 37)

Safety (#38)

ConclusionBudget (#39 & 40)

Further Considerations (#41)

Summary (#42)

NAVIGATION TABLE

Page 48: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

48

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

Kinematic EquationsTop Corner AnalysisBottom Corner AnalysisDrag Thrust ForceAC VFDDC DiagramCustom HubAC Power

BACK UP SLIDES

Page 49: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

49

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

KINEMATIC EQUATIONS

Page 50: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

50

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

• Availability at test locations

•Cost

WHY AC POWER??

Ref: 15, 16

Page 51: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

51

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

-0.8 0.2 1.215161718192021222324

57911131517192123

Launch Height vs. Launch Velocity & Angle

Initial VelocityAngle of Launch

Launch Height (m)

Init

ial

Ve

loci

ty (

m/s

)

An

gle

of

Lau

nch

(d

eg

)

TOP CORNER ANALYSIS

Page 52: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

52

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

BOTTOM CORNER ANALYSIS

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 118.8

19

19.2

19.4

19.6

19.8

20

0

2

4

6

8

10

Launch Height vs. Launch Velocity and Angle

Initial VelocityAngle of Launch

Launch Height (m)

Init

ial V

elo

city

(m

/s)

An

gle

of

Lau

nch

(D

eg

)

Page 53: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

53

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

DRAG

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 218

18.5

19

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

22Ball Velocity with Drag vs.

Time

Time (s)

Ball

Velo

city

(m

/s)

Page 54: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

54

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

THRUST FORCE EQUATIONS

Page 55: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

55

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

THRUST FORCE ANALYSIS

0 5 10 15 20 250

500

1000

1500

2000

Ball Diameter vs. Fthrust

Ball Diameter (inch)

F t

hru

st (

N)

Page 56: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

56

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

56

AC VFD

Page 57: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

57

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

57

DC DIAGRAM

Page 58: Team 16: Mechanical Engineering Dalhousie University Senior Design Project Supervisor: Dr. WarkentinDec. 4 th 2012.

58

Intro

Requirements

Testing

Analysis

Design

Conclusion

Extra Info

Navigation

MECHANICAL : HUB