TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

November 1st, 2012General Admin MeetingBY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D

Director of Human Resources

John McKelvey– Teachscape

November 1st, 2012General Admin MeetingBY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D

Director of Human Resources

John McKelvey– Teachscape

Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

MCLSection 380.1249 3. C (i)

MCLSection 380.1249 3. C (i)

1. If the school administrator conducts teacher performance evaluations, the school administrator's training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers described in subsection (2)(d), including a random sampling of his or her teacher performance evaluations to assess the quality of the school administrator's input in the teacher performance evaluation system.

1. If the school administrator conducts teacher performance evaluations, the school administrator's training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers described in subsection (2)(d), including a random sampling of his or her teacher performance evaluations to assess the quality of the school administrator's input in the teacher performance evaluation system.

Michigan Training Grant MCL 388.1695.

Michigan Training Grant MCL 388.1695.

Sec. 95. (1) From the funds appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $1,750,000.00 for 2012-2013 for grants to districts to support professional development for principals and assistant principals in a department-approved training program for implementing educator evaluations as required under section 1249 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1249.

Sec. 95. (1) From the funds appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $1,750,000.00 for 2012-2013 for grants to districts to support professional development for principals and assistant principals in a department-approved training program for implementing educator evaluations as required under section 1249 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1249.

Grant StipulationsGrant Stipulations Districts Can apply for $350 per building administrator

Must be an approved MDE training module. Contain instructional content on methods of evaluating teachers consistently across multiple grades and subjects.

(b) Include training on evaluation observation that is focused on reliability and bias awareness and that instills skills needed for consistent, evidence-based observations.

Districts Can apply for $350 per building administrator

Must be an approved MDE training module. Contain instructional content on methods of evaluating teachers consistently across multiple grades and subjects.

(b) Include training on evaluation observation that is focused on reliability and bias awareness and that instills skills needed for consistent, evidence-based observations.

Grant StipulationsGrant Stipulations (c) Incorporate the use of videos of actual lessons for applying rubrics and consistent scoring.

(d) Align with recommendations of the governor's council on educator effectiveness.

(e) Provide ongoing support to maintain inter-rater reliability. As used in this subdivision, "inter-rater reliability" means a consistency of measurement from different evaluators independently applying the same evaluation criteria to the same classroom observation.

(c) Incorporate the use of videos of actual lessons for applying rubrics and consistent scoring.

(d) Align with recommendations of the governor's council on educator effectiveness.

(e) Provide ongoing support to maintain inter-rater reliability. As used in this subdivision, "inter-rater reliability" means a consistency of measurement from different evaluators independently applying the same evaluation criteria to the same classroom observation.

The Danielson Teachscape Model

The Danielson Teachscape Model

Highest Validity and Reliability based on state study of current evaluation models.

State is currently piloting four different models

Link:http://www.teachscape.com/products/danielson-proficiency-system

Highest Validity and Reliability based on state study of current evaluation models.

State is currently piloting four different models

Link:http://www.teachscape.com/products/danielson-proficiency-system

PlanPlan We had a review committee Brainstorm ideas

We will be able to receive training via the following methods

Gen Admin large group discussion Secondary Admin or Elementary Forum Small Group example, instructional rounds

We had a review committee Brainstorm ideas

We will be able to receive training via the following methods

Gen Admin large group discussion Secondary Admin or Elementary Forum Small Group example, instructional rounds

PlanPlan As individuals on-line from any location

All individuals will take an exam at the end to receive certification

Increase Rater-Reliability and Credibility

Working on letter of agreement with ADSA for comp day.

As individuals on-line from any location

All individuals will take an exam at the end to receive certification

Increase Rater-Reliability and Credibility

Working on letter of agreement with ADSA for comp day.

FrameworkFramework

Dearborn : Standards

1. Classroom Environment

2. Preparation and Planning

3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Communication and Professional Responsibilities

Dearborn : Standards

1. Classroom Environment

2. Preparation and Planning

3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Communication and Professional Responsibilities

Danielson: Domains

1. Planning and Preparation

2. Classroom Environment

3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities

Danielson: Domains

1. Planning and Preparation

2. Classroom Environment

3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities

Danielson I-observation technique

Danielson I-observation technique

1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments

2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.

3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.

4. Environmental observations

1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments

2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.

3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.

4. Environmental observations

Other Dearborn to Danielson Framework

correlations

Other Dearborn to Danielson Framework

correlations Dearborn 4 Levels: ineffective, minimally effective, effective, highly effective

Danielson, unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, distinguished

Elements in both models, but Danielson has attributes

Dearborn 4 Levels: ineffective, minimally effective, effective, highly effective

Danielson, unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, distinguished

Elements in both models, but Danielson has attributes

ObservationsObservations

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?