Targeted(MS(and(its(Applicaon( in(Biology(and(Medicine( · PDF fileTargeted proteomics:...
Transcript of Targeted(MS(and(its(Applicaon( in(Biology(and(Medicine( · PDF fileTargeted proteomics:...
Targeted MS and its Applica2on in Biology and Medicine
Hasmik Keshishian Proteomics Group The Broad Ins2tute of MIT and Harvard
Perturbations: • Disease • Development • Drug • KO/KI
Discovery defines a reduced set of “sentinel” marks that need to be repeatedly measured in a range perturbations
Precisely measure selected analytes in all experiments – no
missing data!
Desired assay properties:
• Highly specific • Sensitive • Highly precise • Multiplexed • Interference-free
Past: Westerns; Immunoassays
Analyte Valley of Death
Not all proteins and PTMs of interest observed in all experiments
Conventional protein measurement methods have major limitations
Properties of the Measurements Western blotting Immunoassay
Specificity of method Highly variable Good Standards (proteins) available for analytical validation No Few
Internal standards used for high inter-laboratory reproducibility No No
Validated assays for high % of proteome No No Quantitative No to semi Yes Moderate-to-high throughput No Yes Can be highly (e.g., >20) multiplexed No No Interferences detectable and avoidable No No New assays easy to generate (time, reagents, cost, expertise)? No No
Targeted proteomics: hypothesis-driven technology for biology and medicine
Targeted MS Methods
• Fewer arrows shot • Fewer pep2des hit • What you hit is defined by user • All selected pep2des hit all the 2me • Quan2fica2on is highly precise and can
be accurate using internal standards. • 50-‐1000x more sensi2ve than Discovery
Classic “Discovery” MS
• Lots of “arrows” shot • Many, many pep2des hit • What you hit is not up to you • Pep2des not repeatedly detected
across experiments • Good rela2ve quan2fica2on if
labeling is used
How targeted MS (MRM-MS) differs from conventional MS/MS
Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer Q1 Q2 Q3
Ionize all peptides
Mass-select peptide ion
Fragment peptide ion
MRM-MS
MRM spectrum
10 ms
Monitor 3 fragment ions
Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer Q1 Q2 Q3
Detect all fragment ions
Ionize all peptides
Mass-select peptide ion
Fragment peptide ion
200 400 600 800 1000
Mass spectrum
200 ms
MS/MS Operating Mode
Terminology:
SRM – Selected Reac2on Monitoring MRM – Mul2ple Reac2on Monitoring PRM – Parallel Reac2on Monitoring Transi;on – Precursor coupled to a specific product ion
(Q1/Q3 pair) Peak Area Ra;o (PAR) –
Refer to the same targeted MS method on a triple quadrupole Mass spectrometer
Peak Area (light) Peak Area (heavy)
Refers to a targeted MS method on high resolu2on MS instrument
Proteins of interest
Define “signature peptides” for the protein
1. Existing data from in-house unbiased experiments
2. Proteomics data in public domain (GPM, PeptideAtlas)
3. Predictive algorithms (ESP, PeptideSieve)
Configure MRM assay
Synthesize heavy internal standard peptides
Apply MRM assay to samples
MRM assay construction
Ratio “light” peptide to “heavy” peptide
m/z A
bund
ance
*
*
*
Q1 Q2 Q3
Endogenous “light” peptides
Spike “heavy” Internal standard
peptides
568.8/716.4 568.8/829.5 568.8/916.5
y6
y8
y7
571.8/722.4 571.8/835.5 571.8/922.5
y6
y8
y7
G Y S I F S Y A T [12C6]K y8 y7 y6
MH+ = 1136.6 [M+2H]2+ = 568.8
G Y S I F S Y A T [13C6]K y8 y7 y6
MH+ = 1142.6 [M+2H]2+ = 571.8
PAR = [12C6] Peak Area [13C6] Peak Area
Monitoring a pair of 12C/13C peptides by MRM-MS
Key Steps in Developing Targeted Quant. Assays
• Selection of Targets – Empirical MS data or known targets of interest? – Synthesis of heavy and light peptide targets
• Characterization of Targets – Selection of transitions and assay optimization
• Determination of Assay Figures of Merit – LOD/LOQ – Assay Precision
• Testing on typical samples
– Demonstrates robustness of assay – Surveys assay for utility in samples of interest
• Application to real samples
Light Heavy 0 0.5
0.05 0.5
0.1 0.5
0.5 0.5
1 0.5
Q1 Q2 Q3
Response Curves and Figures of Merit
LOD Reproducibility Calibration Curve
Light peptide at varying conc.
Heavy peptide at constant conc.
Relevant Background
Output: Spectral Library
Input: DDA Search results
(mzXML, pepXML, etc)
Output: Vendor Specific MRM
Instrument Method
Input: Targeted Peptide List
Output: Peak identification and
automatic integration
Input: Vendor specific acquisition files
Output: Comprehensive
results report
Input: Integrated peaks, report parameters
Selection of target
peptides
MRM data acquisition
User data
analysis
skyline.gs.washington.edu
11
QuaSAR try 2012−05−15
Overall Reproducibility
Theoretical Concentration (fmol/ul)
Coeff
icien
t of V
ariat
ion (%
)
50
100
150●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●●
●
●
●
●●●
0 0.01 0.05 0.135 0.375 1 4 20 100
try 2012−05−15Distribution of LOD values
(Outliers not shown)
Conc
entra
tion (
fmol/
ul)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
LOD
Calibration curves for Peptide: AAYLQETGKPLDETLK
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0 50 100 150
050
100
150
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 3.y10.1 0.39 1.0E+03 3.y13.2 0.06 8.1E+03 3.y15.2 0.04 6.4E+03 Spike level : 10
Data points for Peptide: AAYLQETGKPLDETLK
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0.01
0.11
1010
0Title : try (Concentration Plots)
Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 3.y10.1 0.39 1.0E+03 3.y13.2 0.06 8.1E+03 3.y15.2 0.04 6.4E+03 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 3.y10.1 0.39 1.0E+03 3.y13.2 0.06 8.1E+03 3.y15.2 0.04 6.4E+03 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 3.y10.1 0.39 1.0E+03 3.y13.2 0.06 8.1E+03 3.y15.2 0.04 6.4E+03 Spike level : 10
Calibration curves for Peptide: AEVNGLAAQGK
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0 50 100 150
050
100
150
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.11 7.1E+03 2.y7.1 0.08 3.1E+03 2.y8.1 0.07 7.7E+03 Spike level : 10
Data points for Peptide: AEVNGLAAQGK
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0.01
0.11
1010
0Title : try (Concentration Plots)
Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.11 7.1E+03 2.y7.1 0.08 3.1E+03 2.y8.1 0.07 7.7E+03 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.11 7.1E+03 2.y7.1 0.08 3.1E+03 2.y8.1 0.07 7.7E+03 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.11 7.1E+03 2.y7.1 0.08 3.1E+03 2.y8.1 0.07 7.7E+03 Spike level : 10
Calibration curves for Peptide: ALQASALNAWR
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0 50 100 150
050
100
150
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.28 3.0E+03 2.y7.1 0.06 1.3E+04 2.y8.1 0.05 1.5E+04 Spike level : 10
Data points for Peptide: ALQASALNAWR
Theoretical Conc (fmol/ul)
Meas
ured
Con
c (fm
ol/ul)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0.01
0.11
1010
0Title : try (Concentration Plots)
Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.28 3.0E+03 2.y7.1 0.06 1.3E+04 2.y8.1 0.05 1.5E+04 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.28 3.0E+03 2.y7.1 0.06 1.3E+04 2.y8.1 0.05 1.5E+04 Spike level : 10
Title : try (Concentration Plots)Agilent6490_SurrogateStudy_Fwd_MinMatrix_011912_jmr−calcurves 2012−05−15
LOD IS.Area 2.y5.1 0.28 3.0E+03 2.y7.1 0.06 1.3E+04 2.y8.1 0.05 1.5E+04 Spike level : 10
Overall Reproducibility
Skyline: an essential free tool for targeted assays QuaSAR: fully integrated into Skyline
Numerous, well documented Studies • Addona (2009) Nature Biotech • Whiteaker (2011) Mol Cell Proteomics • Addona (2011) Nature Biotech • Kuhn (2011) Mol Cell Proteomics • HüNenhain (2012) Sci Transl Med • Kennedy (2013) Nature Methods • Keshishian (2014) Mol Cell Proteomics 800 MRM assays; 2400 transi;ons
High Mul;plex and Informa;on Content
MRM-MS is precise, reproducible, robust, and can be highly multiplexed
Robust Precise and Reproducible
Lab 1
Lab 6
Lab 2 Lab 3
Lab 4 Lab 5
Automated Sample Processing
Gillette and Carr Nature Methods, 2013
Enrichment methods increase limits of detection
Peptides in digested sample Add 13C-labeled
signature peptide
Capture on Ab-coated magnetic beads
Native (12C) peptide Heavy Stnd (13C) peptide
MRM-MS with Ab-capture of peptides decreases assay complexity and increases robustness (iMRM or SISCAPA1)
1. Anderson et al. (2004) J. Prot. Res.
Ratio 13C-peptide to 12C-peptide by MRM-MS
12C-peptide 13C6-peptide
Time, minutes
Abu
ndan
ce
* * * * MRM-MS
Wash; elute peptides
Advantages of SISCAPA • Simpler sample handling prior
to LC-MS/MS to reach ng/mL • Only requires 1 Ab • Easy to obtain useful anti-
peptide Abs (>75% success)
1000’s - >10,000 fold enrichment
When Would You Use Targeted Quantification?
• You have a candidate list (10’s - >100) of proteins and/or phosphopeptides you want to repeatedly measure under varying conditions, cell types, etc. – Precise, relative quantification across samples – Control vs stimulated cell lines – Normal vs disease-state tissue or plasma
• Wherever change of abundance is needed – Exact peptide sequence is monitored and quantified – Small changes in abundance can be determined (<<2-fold)
• Case Studies
Discovery and Verification proteomics in a human model of myocardial injury: planned myocardial infarction (PMI)
Discovery Goal: Generate list of candidate protein biomarkers
and specific pep2des to target Technique: LC-‐MS/MS with extensive frac2ona2on Sample: Proximal fluid (coronary sinus)
Femoral Vein Samples
Time (min): Baseline, 10, 60,
240, 1440
Coronary Sinus Samples
Time (min): Baseline, 10, 60
Addona et al. Nature Biotechnology (2011) 29: 635
QuanCtaCve VerificaCon Goal: Quan2fy protein abundance in cases, controls Technique: frac2on-‐MRM-‐MS and immunoassay Sample: Peripheral plasma of cases (PMI, SMI, ischemia) and controls (rou2ne catheteriza2on)
Fuzzy C-means clustering identified 333 regulated proteins in 5 clusters: pick peptides from proteins of interest from each cluster
Keshishian et al. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2015
23 Antibodies for 23 Peptides/ 13 Protein targets
Protein Peptide Ug Ab in the
mix Troponin I NITEIADLTQK 2
IL 33 TDPGVFIGVK 2 VLLSYYESQHPSNESGDGVDGK 2
ACLP Aortic carboxypeptidase-like protein 1
ILNPGEYR 2 DTPVLSELPEPVVAR 2
FHL1 four and a half LIM domains 1 isoform 5
AIVAGDQNVEYK 2 NPITGFGK 2
MYL3 Myosin light chain 3 AAPAPAPPPEPERPK 2 ALGQNPTQAEVLR 2 HVLATLGER 2
TPM1 Isoform 4 of Tropomyosin alpha-1 chain
LVIIESDLER 2 SIDDLEDELYAQK 1 HIAEDADR 2
ITGB1 Isoform Beta-1C of Integrin beta-1
GEVFNELVGK 1
TAGLN2 Transgelin-2 ENFQNWLK 2 TAGLN1 Transgelin-1 AAEDYGVIK 2
FGL2 Fibroleukin ELESEVNK 1 EEINVLHGR 2
SCUBE2 Signal peptide GSVACECRPGFELAK 2
FSTL1 Follistatin-related protein 1 IQVDYDGHCK 2 LDSSEFLK 2
SPON1 Spondin-1 VEGDPDFYKPGTSYR 2 AQWPAWQPLNVR 2
Patient samples for immunoMRM (iMRM)
Blood Draws
Baseline (pre-heparin)
10 min 1 hrs 4 hrs Baseline (post-heparin)
2 hrs 24 hrs
Planned MI patient samples (12)
MI patient samples (22)
Blood Draws
Baseline 4 hrs 24 hrs
Cath. Control patient samples (8)
Blood Draws
Baseline (pre-heparin)
10 min 1 hrs
ABI 4000QTRAP
Immunoaffinity enrichment
LC-MRM
Overview of Broad’s Automated iMRM Workflow
Desalt
Desalt using
vacuum manifold
KingFisher
Overnight capture using
Labquake
Bravo
Digest
Capture Target Pep;des • 23 an2body Mastermix • 2ug beads per ug Ab • Crosslinked Ab to bead
Plate of 30ul Digested Plasma (not depleted) • Add heavy pep2de
mix over ager diges2on, prior desal2ng
Wash and Elute Target Pep;des • Wash 2x in 1x PBS, 0.03% CHAPS • Wash 1x in 0.1x PBS, 0.03% CHAPS • Elute in 3%ACN, 5% HOAc
Analyze • LC-‐MRM-‐MS • Skyline • QuaSAR
Troponin I
FHL1
PMI MI Control
Cell Cycle Control: G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint Cell Cycle Control: G1/S Checkpoint
Regula2on of Apoptosis Erb B / HER Signaling JAK / STAT Signaling
TGFB Signaling
Case Study 2: Quantification of Phosphopeptides
Challenges with Phosphopeptide Isoforms
LSSLRASTSK
LSSLRASTSK LSSLRASTSK
LSSLRASTSK +
y8
v Co-‐elu2on AND same molecular mass: Limits number of transi2ons for quan2fica2on
v Even if pep2des
don’t co-‐elute, iden2fying which is which is challenging without standards
Lys-‐C; Trypsin
Tissue homogenate, cell lysate
Add labeled phosphopep2des
IMAC
Develop targeted-MS peptide and phosphopeptide marker panels
p
LC-MRM-MS
Enriched Phosphopep2des
MRM spectrum(light and heavy)
10 ms
Targeted MS/MS(MRM-MS)
Full scan (MS/MS)spectrum
100 ms
Data dependent MS/MSa
b
Flu
ores
cenc
e
Retention time (min)
Flu
ores
cenc
e
Retention time (min)
Q2 Q3
Ionize allpeptides
Mass selectpeptide ion
Fragmentpeptide ion
Detect allfragment ions
Q1
Q2 Q3
Ionize allpeptides
Mass selectpeptide ion
Fragmentpeptide ion
Monitor ≥3fragment ions
Q1
Endogenous analyte peptideSynthetic isotope-labeled peptide(a.k.a. “internal standard”)
Collisiongas
Electrosprayemitter
Selec2vely detect and quan2fy proteins and phosphopep2des, including ischemia-‐associated markers iden2fied
YAP1 QASTDAGTAGALTPQHVR
MAPK1 VADPDHDHTGFLTEYVATR
Enrichment is necessary for phosphopeptide measurements
• There is no significant endogenous signal for phosphorylated targets in unenriched samples
• Enrichment increases detection of some of the endogenous peptides in cell lysate
• After enrichment, percent of SM hits that are phosphorylated is 98-99%
Unenriched Enriched (IMAC)
GSK3B (S9)
TTSFAESCKPVQQPSAFGSMK
Measuring phosphosites to discover similari;es in cell signaling among phenotypes elicited by drug treatment (“P100 assay”)
Abelin, Jaffe et al. Proteomics PlaMorm
Example application of P100 Assay: dose response to kinase inhibitor
Abelin et al. submiNed
Case Study 3: Histones and their post-translational modifications
Source: PDB 1AOI, Luger et al. Nature (1997)
ph
me
me me me
Associated with transcrip2onal regulatory states of genomic loci
Histones are not amenable to traditional proteomics approaches
Histone H3:
• Trypsin diges2on would create many short pep2des and would do so inconsistently due to presence of numerous inhibi2ng modifica2ons
10 20 30 40 50 60 ARTKQTARKSTGGKAPRKQLATKAARKSAPATGGVKKPHRYRPGTVALREIRRYQKSTEL 70 80 90 100 110 120 LIRKLPFQRLVREIAQDFKTDLRFQSSAVMALQEACEAYLVGLFEDTNLCAIHAKRVTIM 130 PKDIQLARRIRGERA Red: Trypsin cleavage sites
Histones are not amenable to traditional proteomics approaches
Histone H3:
• Propionylate lysine - Consistent pep2des - Helps with reten2on since histone pep2des are
very hydrophilic
10 20 30 40 50 60 ARTKQTARKSTGGKAPRKQLATKAARKSAPATGGVKKPHRYRPGTVALREIRRYQKSTEL 70 80 90 100 110 120 LIRKLPFQRLVREIAQDFKTDLRFQSSAVMALQEACEAYLVGLFEDTNLCAIHAKRVTIM 130 PKDIQLARRIRGERA
Source: Garcia et al. Nature Protoc. (2007)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Time (min)
50
100
Rela2ve Ab
undance
33.50 551.9957
42.41 575.8434
37.90 549.8186 26.10
541.3210 43.66 582.8521
31.88 547.3229 21.58
526.3099
59.23 309.1305 49.74
694.3874 9.96
399.7397 58.04 343.2953 21.06
490.7913 46.75 743.9099 57.48
320.2039 0.91 371.1012
0
H3K4me3 H3K4me2
H3K18ac0K23ac1
H3K27me2K36me1
H3K18ac0K23ac0 H3K27ac1K36me3
H3K9me3K14ac1
H3-‐41-‐49
H3K9me2K14ac0
Highly mul;plexed MRM-‐MS is an equally valuable tool in biology: assays for modified pep;des
modifica;ons
Cell lines
Monomethyl = 14.0157 Dimethyl = 28.0313 Trimethyl = 42.0470 Acetyl = 42.0106 Phosphoryl = 79.9663 Ubiquityl stub = 114.0429
Benefits of Targeted MS for peptide/protein assays
• High molecular specificity • Quantitative
• Works in any matrix (cells, tissue, plasma, urine, etc.)
• Works equally well for posttranslationally modified peptides • ‘Sensitivity and assay performance already sufficient to assay many
proteins of interest (mid-pg/mL to high ug/mL)
• Interferences can detected and avoided (unlike Westerns, IHC, immunoassays, aptamers)
• Does not require immunoassay-grade antibodies (2/protein)
• Assays can be highly multiplexed (>100 plex now routine) • Not possible with antibodies; can be done with aptamers
• Assays are transferable with high interlab reproducibility • Multiple MS platforms now capable of targeted MS experiments (not just
triple quads any longer)
References
1. Paola Picor & Ruedi Aebersold. Selected reac2on monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, poten2al, pitalls and future direc2ons. Nature Methods. 9, 555 – 566 (2012)
2. Gilleue MA and Carr SA. Quan2ta2ve analysis of pep2des and proteins in biomedicine by targeted mass spectrometry. Nat Methods (2013) 10(1): 28-‐34.
3. Carr SA et al. Targeted Pep2de Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Prac2ces for Mass Spectrometry-‐based Assay Development Using a Fit-‐for-‐Purpose Approach. Mol Cell Proteomics (2014) 13(3): 907-‐917.
4. Addona T. et al., “A pipeline that integrates discovery and verifica2on of plasma protein biomarkers reveals candidate markers for cardiovascular disease”, Nature Biotechnology (2011) 29: 635
5. Creech AL et al. Building the Connec2vity Map of epigene2cs: Chroma2n profiling by quan2ta2ve targeted mass spectrometry. Methods (2014) Nov 6.
6. Abba2ello SE et al. Large-‐scale inter-‐laboratory study to develop, analy2cally validate and apply highly mul2plexed, quan2ta2ve pep2de assays to measure cancer-‐relevant proteins in plasma. Mol Cell Proteomics (2015) Feb 18. pii: mcp.M114.047050. in press
7. Keshishian H Mul2plexed, Quan2ta2ve Workflow for Sensi2ve Biomarker Discovery in Plasma Yields Novel Candidates for Early Myocardial Injury. Mol Cell Proteomics (2015) Feb 27. pii: mcp.M114.046813. in press