T18 VG2.4 Disk #2 processing summary · MV/m Total# BD RF-ON integrated (hr) 090610 090709 SLAC...
Transcript of T18 VG2.4 Disk #2 processing summary · MV/m Total# BD RF-ON integrated (hr) 090610 090709 SLAC...
T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 processingsummary
SLAC Workshop
090708-10
T. Higo and Nextef group
Whole history of T18_#2 processing
• Installation in Oct. 2008• Steady-state run at 80MV/m in Dec. 2008• Higher field in Jan-Feb 2009• Breakdown rate meas. in Mar.-Apr. 2009• Longer pulse in latter half of Apr. 2009• Breakdown rate meas. May 2009• Various measurement in June 2009• Finish with 4000 hrs operation
090709 2SLAC Workshop
Processing history for 9 monthsNextef startup and careful processing
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2008/10
2008/11
2008/12
2009/1
2009/2
2009/3
2009/4
2009/5
2009/6
200
9/7
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 Processing whole RF-ON historyRF-ON
vs date (h
r)
090709 3SLAC Workshop
Recovery pass in (T,P) space
CERN
T
P
50%P, -20%T
SLAC
T
P
20%P, 20nsT
KEK
T
P
P, -1stepT
In case of number of BD’s even atlower power level than defined
090709 SLAC Workshop 4
Whole BD history of T18_VG2.4_Disk #2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
MasterTable_Eacc_Trend till_090610
<Eacc> 51nsec Ushi<Eacc> 113ns Ushi<Eacc> 173n ushi<Eacc> 213n Ushi<Eacc> 253ns UshimotoEacc keep 253ns UshiEacc 51ns UshiEacc 113ns UshiEacc 173ns UshiEacc 213ns UshiEacc 253ns UshiEacc Usahimoto 2/21-3/23Eacc 252ns Usahi 4/1-4/7Eacc 252ns 4/7-14Eacc 312ns 4/14-16Eacc 412ns 4/23-27Eacc 331ns 4/28-5/1Eacc 252ns 5/1-11Eacc 412ns 5/11-6/10
Total BD<Eacc> MV/m
Total# B
D
RF-ON integrated (hr)
090610
090709 5SLAC Workshop
Nextef: RF monitors along waveguide
SLAC Workshop 6
Two klystronsACC Structure
Low loss waveguide
2-klystrons 120MW, 300nsklystron—3dB 2.3m3dB— LLWG 1.5mLLWG 5mLLWG—ACC Str 5.0mWR90 flanges ~36sets*7mm SUS
Loss Kly. Str. ~23%Delay ~ 50ns
090709
Nextef: Monitors along beam axis
090709 SLAC Workshop
GVGVPM PMAM
Sl i t
FC
E
E
I P
Louni nel oad
Ot sukal oad
DC
I PH
VAC
I nsulVAC
I PDC H
H
Var i an I P
187
KX03 425
FC
I P
Load
Var i anI P
Q- mass
WC WCFC
FC
VAC DC
230
FC-MidFC-UPFC-DN
Qmass
PM PMAM
GVGVACC str
7
Now T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 has beenprocessed since late October
T18_VG2.4_Disk
GV SLAC3dB hybrid
Acousticsensors
Plastic scintilator& PMT
FC
090709 SLAC Workshop
(These are not used effecively.)8
Big breakdown followed by a breakdownfrom the very first pulse
0 200 400 600 800 1000
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
18 000
20 000
22 000
24 000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
10 000
5000
5000
10000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
file number= 3 20081124_210211_1 Red=final, black=previous pulse and blue=-2nd pulse
0 200 400 600 800 1000
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
18000
20000
22000
24000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
10 000
5000
5000
10000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
file number= 4 20081124_210301_1 Red=final, black=previous pulse and blue=-2nd pulse 1st pulse BD,following big BD
Nominal BD
FsRs Ra
Tr
FC-UP FC-Mid
Fs
DPO
1D
PO2
090709 SLAC Workshop 9
Current burst toward upstream
0 200 400 600 800 1000
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
18 000
20 000
22 000
24 000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
10 000
5000
5000
10 000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
200 400 600 800 1000
10000
10 000
20 000
30 000
200 400 600 800 1000
30 000
20 000
10 000
10000
20000
30000
Rare event but need to understand the mechanismOne out of 100 breakdownsAbrupt big burst in current only to upstreamno change in RF pulse shape
FsRs Ra
Tr
FC-UP FC-Mid
Fs
090709 SLAC Workshop 10
Power at BD’s and BDR during 27 days at 80MV/m (35MW)during RF-ON from 700 ~ 1200 hours since startup
BDR
~17 str. BD / 566 hr
~0.030 BD/hr/str
~0.75 x10-6 BD/Pulse/m0
10
20
30
40
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
BD power vs RF-ON period from Nov. 28-Dec. 25
Power MW
Excessive power related
Power FC-UP
Pow
er
MW
(ca
lib. n
eede
d)
RF ON Period (hours)
Total 20 BD's/585hrs (3 BD's are over pulse driven)
Power is calculated from DPO with a background subtraction
Finished at9:00 onDec. 25
Started at10:00 onNov. 28
566 hrs run / 643 hrs= 88% ON
090709 11SLAC Workshop
252ns, 65MW
Total operation hours >5MW = 140.6 hours
Period ACC-IN > 64 MW = 91.7 hours090709 12SLAC Workshop
Appearance of breakdowns at 65MW run
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2200 2250 2300 2350
Breakdowns and other INTLK's during 65MW runRun#29 09027-090305
Total BDACC-BDFollowing BDFC-UPWG-BD
Total BD
RF-ON (hrs)
090709 13SLAC Workshop
252ns, 70MW
090709 14SLAC Workshop
Appearance of breakdowns at 70MW run
2140
2145
2150
2155
2160
2720 2730 2740 2750 2760 2770 2780 2790 2800
Breakdowns and other INTLK's during 70MW runRun#32-2 090403-090407
Total BDACC-BDFollowing BDFC-UPWG-BD
Tota
l BD
RF-ON (hrs)
090709 15SLAC Workshop
252ns, 75MW
090709 16SLAC Workshop
Appearance of breakdowns at 75MW run
2180
2200
2220
2240
2260
2280
2300
2850 2860 2870 2880 2890 2900 2910 2920
Breakdowns and other INTLK's during 75MW run (Run#32-3)
Total BDACC-BDFollowing BDFC-UPWG
Total BD
RF-ON (hrs)090709 17SLAC Workshop
Typical processing / steady-state run
• Breakdowns are– mostly followed by a few to several successive
breakdowns
– typically from the very first pulse at even lowerpower.
• Spurious events exist– with flush of current towards upstream occur
from time to time
090709 18SLAC Workshop
Breakdown rate evaluation
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Breakdown rate for 252ns and 412ns
BDR(ACC) 412ns
BDR(ACC) 252ns
BDR(ACC) 252ns
BDR(ACC) [1/pulse/m]
Eacc [MV/m]
0530-0610(3700hr)
0525-0530(3500hr)
0520-0525(3500hr)
0515-0518(3400hr)
0511-0515(3300hr)
0501-0507(3100hr)
0423-0427(2900hr)
0411-0414(2800hr)
0403-0407 (2700hr)
0402-0403 (2700hr)
0401-0402 (2700hr)
0313-0323 (2500hr)
0227-0305(2300hr)
1128-1225(700-1200hr)
It is not so clear from this experiment that the breakdown ratedecreases as function of “processing.”090709 19SLAC Workshop
Breakdown rate versus Eacc
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Breakdown rate for 252ns and 412ns
BDR(ACC) 412nsBDR(ACC) 252nsBDR(ACC) 252ns
y = 2.3888e-18 * e^(0.28603x) R= 0.97016
y = 1.815e-17 * e^(0.24289x) R= 0.94792
BDR
(ACC
)
[1/
puls
e/m]
Eacc [MV/m]
Exponential fit.090709 20SLAC Workshop
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Breakdown rate for 252ns and 412ns
BDR(ACC) 412nsBDR(ACC) 252nsBDR(ACC) 252ns
y = 5.2958e-61 * x^(27.542) R= 0.96504
y = 2.1053e-60 * x^(26.721) R= 0.94346
BDR
(ACC
) [1/pulse/m]
Eacc [MV/m]
Power fit.Cannot discuss functional form due to large scatter.
090709 21SLAC Workshop
7/10/2009 X-Band 2008 Page 22
100 150 20010
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
RF Flat Top Pulse Width: ns
BKD
Rat
e: 1
/pul
se/m
95 100 105 110 11510
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
Unloaded Gradient: MV/m
BK
D R
ate:
1/p
ulse
/m
RF BKD Rate Gradient Dependence for 230ns Pulse at DifferentConditioning Time
After 250hrs RFCondition
After 500hrs RFCondition
After 900hrs RFCondition
RF BKD Rate Pulse Width Dependence at Different ConditioningTime
G=108MV/m
G=108MV/m
G=110MV/m
RF Processing of the T18 Structure
After 1200hrs RFCondition
This performance maybe good enough for 100MV/m structure for a warm collider, however, it does not yetcontain all necessary features such as wake field damping. Future traveling wave structure designs will alsohave better efficiencies
R. Ruth at X-band workshop at CI, UK, Dec. 2009
Breakdown rate versus width
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
0 100 200 300 400 500
BDR_vs_Width
BDR [1/pulse/m]
Width [nsec]
BDR = 3e-18 * Tp^5
BDR = 9e-25 * Tp^7.45
Not enough to discuss functional form.But it is evident that the longer pulse makes breakdown ratelarge with much more than linear dependence.
090709 23SLAC Workshop
Summary of breakdown rate
• Exponential slope as Eacc– Data scattering band around a slope is by an order
of magnitude
– Slope = an order of magnitude by 10 MeV/m
– Not enough to discuss about the functional form
• Breakdown rate evolution– Reduction of BDR was not seen in last 2000 hours
090709 24SLAC Workshop
Breakdown position and timing
• Still trying to analyze in detail.
• At present, mainly refer to Steffen’s previousanalysis– More frequent at downstream
090709 25SLAC Workshop
Analysis still on the way137 examples of run24: 60MW, 400ns
090709 SLAC Workshop 26
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
run34_60MW_400nstiming delay from Rs to Tr
Rs-Tr
Rs-Tr
BD*#1
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
DPO run34 60MW, 400nsRs_timing
Tr_timing
Rs_rise
Tr_rise
Rs, Tr Timing and Rise/Fall time
Rs_rise, Tr_fall
BD*#
Timing of Rs rise and Tr fall show correlation.Two cases: those at the same time and those at 50ns later.Position and time of the breakdown should be deduced from Rs and Tr.FC current burst timing and amount should be integrated in the analysis.Breakdowns from the very first pulse are missing; should be included in the analysis.
Red real cell timing, blue linear cell timing, 205 ns data
5 10 150
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Breakdown position
No.
of s
hots
Breakdown position for 205 ns dataSteffen 090227
Dark current measurement
• Setup
• Amount and beta value of dark current versusprocessing time
• Spectrum at RF-ON 2000hrs and 4000hrs
75cm 75cm 195cm
FC-DNFC-UP FC-Mid AM
090709 28SLAC Workshop
Amount of dark current
090709 SLAC Workshop 29
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Dark Current 090414 Tp=252ns
FC-UP microA (253ns, 090225)FC-Mid microA (253ns, 090225)FC-DN microA (253ns, 090225)
FC-UP micro
A
Eacc [MV/m]
FC-Mid = 30 A@100MV/m
FC-UP ~ FC-Mid/3
FC-DN ~ FC-Mid/4
Dark current evolution 252nsec
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
50 60 70 80 90 100 200
T18_#2 Dark Current evolution081128-081224-090224-090414-090515
FC-UP [microA] (081128)
FC-UP [microA] (081224)
FC-UP microA (253ns, 090225)
FC-UP microA (253ns, 090414)
FC-UP microA 090515
FC-UP mi
croA
Eacc [MV/m]
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
50 60 70 80 90 100 200
T18_#2 Dark Current evolution081128-081224-090224-090414-090515
FC-Mid [microA] (081128)
FC-Mid [microA] (081224)
FC-Mid microA (253ns, 090225)
FC-Mid microA (253ns, 090414)
FC-Mid microA 090515FC-Mid micr
oA
Eacc [MV/m]
Measured at RF ON 700 – 1200 – 2100 – 3000 – 3400 hoursDecreased by a factor 2 between processing with max Eacc 80 110MV/m,
but no more suppression in the following steady-state run for more than 1000 hours090709 30SLAC Workshop
Dark current evolution 252nsec
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
T18_#2 Dark Current evolution081128-081224-090224-090414-090515
I_UP/Eacc^2.5 (081128)
I_UP/Eacc^2.5 (081224)
FN FC-UP (253ns, 090225)
FN FC-UP (253ns, 090414)
I_UP/E^2.5 253ns 090515
y = 0.14557 * e^(-653.42x) R= 0.99838
y = 0.074674 * e^(-672.19x) R= 0.99772
FC-UP microA/(MV/m)^2.5
Eacc [MV/m]
beta=37
beta=36
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
T18_#2 Dark Current evolution081128-081224-090224-090414-090515
I_Mid/Eacc^2.5 (081128)
I_Mid/Eacc^2.5 (081224)
FN FC-Mid (253ns, 090225)
FN FC-Mid (253ns, 090414)
I_Mid/E^2.5 253ns 090515
y = 0.22345 * e^(-596.01x) R= 0.99982
y = 0.1351 * e^(-607.18x) R= 0.99854
FC-Mid micro
A/(MV/m)
^2.5
Eacc [MV/m]
beta=40
beta=39
Measured at RF ON 700 – 1200 – 2100 – 3000 – 3400 hoursNo big change in shape nor slope (beta).
090709 31SLAC Workshop
Deduction of the field enhancement factor
)/()/(1053.6
5.2
5.19
mMVEmVE accs eeE
I
23951)/(
6530 5.1
accs EE
(Cu)=4.52eV
Assuming Es/Eacc=2actually T18_VG2.4_Disk
Es/<Eacc>~2.62 max
Fitting of modified F-N curve
090709 32SLAC Workshop
Width dependence
Upstream currentbehaves as linear onwidth
Downstream current hastwo components.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Darck current at 103MV/mdependence on pulse width
FC-UP [pA]
FC-Mid [pA]
FC [p
A] at 50Hz
Width 090515
090709 33SLAC Workshop
Dark current spectra in June
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Spectrum_vs_Width at 64MW
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 113ns, 64MW
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 331ns
I_s
lit peak [microA]
pc (MeV/c)
090618
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 5 10 15
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Spectrum_vs_power at 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 55MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 70MW, 252ns
I_s
lit peak [micr
oA]
pc (MeV/c)
090618Dependence on power Dependence on width
Actual field of analyzer magnet was checked.The formula used up to now pc[MeV/m] = 1.646 x I [A] = 8.23xRef. Volt. [V] was confirmed.
Two peaks appear and higher for higher momentum one.Less than ½ of full acceleration.Little exists below 2.5MeV/m.
090709 34SLAC Workshop
Dark current versus operation frequency
100
150
200
250
300
350
11422.5 11423 11423.5 11424 11424.5 11425 11425.5 11426
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Downstrean dark current vs frequency
FC-UP [pA]
FC-DN [pA]
FC-UP, FC-DN [pA]
Freq [MHz]
090618
Increase as operation frequency increases.Easy to be captured for both!?
090709 35SLAC Workshop
Dark current behaviour• Amount
– to upstream << to downstream– Divergent: 1/4 from Mid to DN– Linear vs pulse width
• Reduction of dark current– By a factor 2~3 during first 2000 hrs– No reduction after 2000 hrs
• Beta value– Stayed almost constant from 700hrs to 3300 hrs– Not processed?
• Spectrum– Two peaks below half of full acceleration
090709 36SLAC Workshop
Conclusion• Established a basic procedure of processing and evaluation
– Can proceed a series of structure tests
– Better to further develop a system in such as• Phase measurement, missing energy evaluation, etc.
• Breakdown rate was evaluated.– Gross comparison with that of SLAC is consistent with each other.
– In order to precisely compare, power estimation and identification ofbreakdowns should be better.
• Dark current– Decreased during initial processing but stayed constant during a long-
term run without higher field nor longer pulse processing.
– Energy is at most a half of full acceleration and little exists below a fewMeV/c.
• Breakdown pulse analysis– Breakdown pulses are still to be analyzed carefully.
090709 37SLAC Workshop