ghostlake.caghostlake.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AGENDA-PACKAGE.pdf · Summer Village of Ghost...

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Council Meeting Agenda Saturday, November 26, 2019 6:30pm

Days Inn and Suites, Meeting Room 5 Westside Drive, Cochrane Alberta

ITEM DESCRIPTION

DISCUSSION

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

APPROVE

3. DELEGATIONS

NIL

4. CONFIDENTAL ITEM

NIL

5. MINUTES

5.1. Regular Meeting November 26, 2019 ADOPT

6. FINANCIALS

6.1. Payment Schedule - Cheque Register

• November 2019

• December 2019

• January 2019

ACKNOWLEDGE

6.2. General Bank Account Reconciliation

• November 2019 & December 2019

• January 2020 Investment Account Reconciliation

• November 2019 & December 2019

• January 2020

APPROVE

6.3. Balance Sheet

• as of December 31, 2019

• as of January 31, 2020

APPROVE

7. OLD BUSINESS

7.1. Highway 1A Upgrade – letter of response from Minister of Transportation ACKNOWLEDGE 7.2. ICF update DISCUSSION 7.3. IDP Agreement with MD of Bighorn APPROVE 7.4. Sale of Yellow Truck DISCUSSION 7.5. Boulevard Bylaw DISCUSSION

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Regular Council Meeting

Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Agenda

8. CORRESPONDANCE

• Police Funding Model

• MAP review

• MSI update from Minister of Municipal Affairs

• CFPA Newsletter Dec 2019

• CFPA Newsletter Jan 2020

• ASVA Newsletter

ACKNOWLEDGE

9. COMMITTEE REPORTS UPDATES

9.1. Public Works

9.1.1. Dock Subcommittee of Public Works

• Public Dock

• 2019 dock space allocation

9.2. Communications and Village Social Life

9.3. Natural Environment and Lake Stewardship

• Tree Bylaw and Policy circulated – will be in Spring Newsletter

9.4. Disaster Services Committee

10. NEW BUSINESS

10.1. ORRSC ACP Grant APPROVE 10.2. ARB Joint Regional Agreement APPROVE 10.3. Next Meeting Date

APPROVE

11. ADJOURNMENT


Feb 18, 2020 Page 2 of 89

DRAFT

SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE Regular Council Meeting November 26, 2019 Page 1 of 4

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE HELD ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2019 AT 6:30 P.M. AT THE DAYS INN AND SUITES, MEETING ROOM

5 WESTSIDE DRIVE, COCHRANE ALBERTA

PRESENT Mayor John Walsh, Deputy Mayor Warren Wilson, Councilor Robyn Carrier,

Chief Administrative Officer Sherri Bureyko and 1 member of the public

Called to Order by Mayor Walsh at 6:44pm.

APPROVE AGENDA

Council reviewed the agenda.

19-065 MOVED by Mayor Walsh that Council approve the agenda as presented.

CARRIED.

MINUTES Council reviewed the minutes of the Regular Meeting September 21, 2019.

19-066 MOVED by Councillor Carrier that the minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 21, 2019, be adopted as circulated. CARRIED.

PAYMENT SCHEDULE

The payment schedule, outlining payments of direct withdrawals and cheque nos. 1767 – 1775 for September thru October 2019 in the amount of $46,524.55 was acknowledged by Council.

BANK RECONCILIATIONS

Council reviewed the General Bank Reconciliation for the periods ending September 30, 2019, and October 31, 2019. Council reviewed the Investment Account Reconciliation for the periods ending September 30, 2019, and October 31, 2019.

19-067

MOVED by Councillor Carrier that the General Bank Reconciliations for the periods ending September 30, 2019, and October 31, 2019, and the Investment Account Reconciliations for the periods ending September 30, 2019, and October 31, 2019 be approved as submitted.

CARRIED.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Council reviewed the Balance Sheet reports for the period ending October 31, 2019.

19-068

MOVED by Councillor Wilson that Council approve the October 31, 2019 Balance Sheet as submitted.

CARRIED.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

DRAFT


2020 INTERIM BUDGET

Council reviewed the 2020 Interim Budget and discussed the following

• Options for Bylaw enforcement

• Golf greens

• Playground equipment – administration to research grants

• Year-round water storage for Fire Fighting purposes

• Volunteer positions requiring training

Council amended the 2020 interim budget to reflect a proposed 1.4% Municipal increase for the 2020 tax year with a 0% increase in the school requisition.

19-069 MOVED by Councillor Carrier that Council approve the 2020 Interim budget as amended.

CARRIED.

OLD BUSINESS

IDP WAIVER

19-070 MOVED by Mayor Walsh that the Summer Village of Ghost Lake request from the Province of Alberta a Ministerial Exemption from the provincial requirement to complete an Intermunicipal Development Plan between our community and the Municipal District of Bighorn #8.

CARRIED.

MDP WORDING REVIEW Council reviewed options provided by the consultant, Greg Birch to address the concerns regarding Accessory Use on properties raised at the Public Hearing held in September 2019. Council directed administration to work with the consultant to amend the MDP wording of the section on Residential Development and Land Use using option # 2 of the options provided.

Council directed administration to change the timeline to re-examine the regulation from 5 years to 3 years.

Council directed administration to make the wording change to the Roads section regarding the proposed expansion of Highway 1A as presented.

BYLAW 233 Council directed administration to amend the proposed Tree Protection Bylaw as follows:

Section 5. Exemption from requirement for Permit

(6) A person may place decorations in the designated trail within the West Protection Area

19-071 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Wilson that Bylaw 233 be given first reading as

amended.

CARRIED.

19-072 MOVED by Councillor Carrier that Bylaw 233 be given second reading.

CARRIED.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

DRAFT


19-073 MOVED by Mayor Walsh that all councilors present are in favor of giving third and final reading at this meeting

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

19-074 MOVED by Councillor Wilson that Bylaw 233 be given third reading and

declared finally passed.

CARRIED.

TREE PROTECTION POLICY

MOVED by Mayor Walsh that Policy 19-05, the Tree Protection Policy be approved as presented.

CARRIED.

DISPOSAL OF CAPITAL ASSETS

Sale of Yellow Truck

• No offers received will continue to look for buyers

CARRIAG RIDGE WATER DIVERSION APPLICATION

There has been no further update currently, Alberta Environment is reviewing the letters of concern that were submitted.

BOW RIVER WORKING GROUP

Mayor Walsh provided an update form the Bow River Working Group and the recent Open houses that were held.

CORRESPONDANCE

Council acknowledged the receipt of the following correspondence • RCMP Letter

• Rural Crime Watch October Newsletter

• Letter from ADM Gary Sandberg re: Municipal Indicators

• AUMA Analysis of Provincial Budget

• Education Tax Requisition comparison 2018-2019

COMMITTEE REPORTS

PUBLIC WORKS Council discussed the need to replace a section of the public dock. 2 quotes were reviewed, and council directed administration that up to $15,000 will be approved if necessary, to purchase a dock. Dock options will continue to be reviewed to determine the most cost-effective option.

DOCK SUBCIOMMITTEE

COMMUNICATIONS & VILLAGE SOCIAL LIFE

FIRE PREVENTION AND

FIRST RESPONSE

NIL

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

AND LAKE STEWARDSHIP

NIL

DISASTER SERVICES NIL

NEW BUSINESS

HIGHWAY 1A UPGRADE Council discussed the recent announcement from the Provincial regarding the Highway 1A upgrades and that the project is moving forward. Administration was directed to send a letter to the Minister of Transportation requesting clarification


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

DRAFT


and information on how this project will affect the Summer Village and how the Summer Village will be engaged in the process

PARKING BYLAW Council discussed the draft version of the Parking and Boulevard Bylaw that did not receive third reading and subsequently died. Administration was directed to begin putting together a new draft parking Bylaw.

BYLAW 239

19-075 Moved by Mayor Walsh that Bylaw 239 – Fees and Charges be given a first reading

CARRIED.

19-076 MOVED by Councillor Carrier that Bylaw 239 be given second reading.

CARRIED.

19-077 MOVED by Councillor Wilson that all councilors present are in favor of giving third and final reading at this meeting.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

19-078 MOVED by Councillor Wilson that Bylaw 239 be given third reading and declared finally passed.

CARRIED.

NEXT MEETING DATE

19-079 Moved by Mayor Walsh that the next Regular Meeting of Council be held on Tuesday February 18, 2020 at the Super 8 Hotel meeting room in Cochrane AB, commencing at 6:30 pm.

CARRIED.

ADJOURNMENT

19-080 MOVED by Mayor Walsh that the meeting adjourn at 1:59 pm.

CARRIED.

Mayor Chief Administrative Officer


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

FINANCIALS


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Num Name Memo Amount

Bank - TD Canada TrustDebit Cochrane Lake Gas Co-op September October -48.62Debit Epcor Energy Sevices October Power -95.261776 Birch Consulting Phase 1 ICF project -7,350.001777 Planning Protocol 2 Inc. General Planning 2019 -1,501.501778 Sherri Bureyko Nov Admin Contract, phone, fax mileage & reim... -3,124.061779 Waste Connections of Canada Nov Bin Service -1,390.86

Total Bank - TD Canada Trust -13,510.30

TOTAL -13,510.30

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Cheque Register As of November 30, 2019

Page 1Summer Village of Ghost Lake

Regular Council Meeting Feb 18, 2020 of 89


Bank - TD Canada TrustDebit Cochrane Lake Gas Co-op November Gas -75.44Debit Epcor Energy Sevices November Power -102.301780 Warren Wilson 2019 Honorarium -500.001781 John Walsh 2019 Honorarium -500.001782 Robyn Carrier 2019 Honorarium -500.001783 Banff Fire & Safety Annual Safety Inspection -271.981784 Calgary RCSSD No 1 December School Requisition Installment -4,883.281785 Sherri Bureyko Dec Admin Contract, phone, fax -2,493.751786 Waste Connections of Canada Dec Bin Service -1,389.59


TOTAL -10,716.34

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Cheque Register As of December 31, 2019




Bank - TD Canada TrustDebit Cochrane Lake Gas Co-op December Gas -98.53Debit Epcor Energy Sevices December Power -102.451787 AUMA 2020 Membership Fees -949.031788 Birch Consulting Phase 2 ICF project -13,650.001789 Cochrane Foothills Protective Associati... 2020 Membership -20.001790 FCM 2020 Membership -100.401791 Oldman River Regional Services Com... 2020 GIS Service fees -1,025.001792 Sherri Bureyko Jan Admin Contract, phone, fax -2,565.151793 Waste Connections of Canada Jan Bin Service -1,418.99


TOTAL -19,929.55

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Cheque Register As of January 31, 2020



Type Date Num Name Clr Amount Balance

Beginning Balance 60,457.11Cleared Transactions

Cheques and Payments - 7 itemsBill Pmt -Cheque 08/29/2019 1762 Leah Fink X -44.89 -44.89Bill Pmt -Cheque 08/29/2019 1763 Karen Hall X -36.23 -81.12Bill Pmt -Cheque 10/31/2019 1775 Waste Connections ... X -1,341.41 -1,422.53Bill Pmt -Cheque 10/31/2019 1773 Benchmark Assess... X -1,179.75 -2,602.28Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/15/2019 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices X -95.26 -2,697.54Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/16/2019 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... X -48.62 -2,746.16Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1778 Sherri Bureyko X -3,124.06 -5,870.22

Total Cheques and Payments -5,870.22 -5,870.22

Deposits and Credits - 1 itemPayment 11/07/2019 Lawre... 5080 Lawrence X 1,928.34 1,928.34

Total Deposits and Credits 1,928.34 1,928.34

Total Cleared Transactions -3,941.88 -3,941.88

Cleared Balance -3,941.88 56,515.23

Uncleared TransactionsCheques and Payments - 5 items

Pay Cheque 07/17/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,246.67 -1,246.67Pay Cheque 07/29/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,316.52 -2,563.19Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1776 Birch Consulting -7,350.00 -9,913.19Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1777 Planning Protocol 2 ... -1,501.50 -11,414.69Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1779 Waste Connections ... -1,390.86 -12,805.55


Total Uncleared Transactions -12,805.55 -12,805.55

Register Balance as of 11/29/2019 -16,747.43 43,709.68

New TransactionsCheques and Payments - 21 items

Cheque 12/13/2019 1782 Robyn Carrier -500.00 -500.00Cheque 12/13/2019 1781 John Walsh -500.00 -1,000.00Cheque 12/13/2019 1780 Warren Wilson -500.00 -1,500.00Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/16/2019 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -75.44 -1,575.44Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/17/2019 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -102.30 -1,677.74Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1784 Calgary RCSSD No 1 -4,883.28 -6,561.02Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1785 Sherri Bureyko -2,493.75 -9,054.77Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1786 Waste Connections ... -1,389.59 -10,444.36Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1783 Banff Fire & Safety -271.98 -10,716.34Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -98.53 -10,814.87Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/17/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -102.45 -10,917.32Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1788 Birch Consulting -13,650.00 -24,567.32Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1792 Sherri Bureyko -2,565.15 -27,132.47Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1793 Waste Connections ... -1,418.99 -28,551.46Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1791 Oldman River Regio... -1,025.00 -29,576.46Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1787 AUMA -949.03 -30,525.49Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1790 FCM -100.40 -30,625.89Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1789 Cochrane Foothills ... -20.00 -30,645.89Cheque 02/13/2020 1794 Karen Hall -2,600.00 -33,245.89Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/14/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -114.52 -33,360.41Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -98.53 -33,458.94


Total New Transactions -33,458.94 -33,458.94

Ending Balance -50,206.37 10,250.74

8:54 PM Summer Village of Ghost Lake 02/15/20 Reconciliation Detail Bank - TD Canada Trust, Period Ending 11/29/2019





Cheques and Payments - 9 itemsBill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1776 Birch Consulting X -7,350.00 -7,350.00Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1779 Waste Connections ... X -1,390.86 -8,740.86Cheque 12/13/2019 1782 Robyn Carrier X -500.00 -9,240.86Cheque 12/13/2019 1780 Warren Wilson X -500.00 -9,740.86Cheque 12/13/2019 1781 John Walsh X -500.00 -10,240.86Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/16/2019 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... X -75.44 -10,316.30Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/17/2019 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices X -102.30 -10,418.60Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1785 Sherri Bureyko X -2,493.75 -12,912.35Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/31/2019 Debit Provincial Tresurer -... X -28,731.24 -41,643.59


Deposits and Credits - 4 itemsDeposit 12/02/2019 X 200.00 200.00Deposit 12/30/2019 X 200.00 400.00Deposit 12/30/2019 X 1,665.82 2,065.82Transfer 12/30/2019 X 550,000.00 552,065.82

Total Deposits and Credits 552,065.82 552,065.82

Total Cleared Transactions 510,422.23 510,422.23

Cleared Balance 510,422.23 566,937.46


Pay Cheque 07/17/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,246.67 -1,246.67Pay Cheque 07/29/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,316.52 -2,563.19Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1777 Planning Protocol 2 ... -1,501.50 -4,064.69Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1784 Calgary RCSSD No 1 -4,883.28 -8,947.97Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1786 Waste Connections ... -1,389.59 -10,337.56Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1783 Banff Fire & Safety -271.98 -10,609.54



Register Balance as of 12/31/2019 499,812.69 556,327.92


Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -98.53 -98.53Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/17/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -102.45 -200.98Transfer 01/27/2020 -500,000.00 -500,200.98Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1788 Birch Consulting -13,650.00 -513,850.98Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1792 Sherri Bureyko -2,565.15 -516,416.13Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1793 Waste Connections ... -1,418.99 -517,835.12Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1791 Oldman River Regio... -1,025.00 -518,860.12Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1787 AUMA -949.03 -519,809.15Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1790 FCM -100.40 -519,909.55Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1789 Cochrane Foothills ... -20.00 -519,929.55Cheque 02/13/2020 1794 Karen Hall -2,600.00 -522,529.55Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/14/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -114.52 -522,644.07Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -98.53 -522,742.60



Ending Balance -22,929.91 33,585.32






Cheques and Payments - 6 itemsBill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1784 Calgary RCSSD No 1 X -4,883.28 -4,883.28Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1786 Waste Connections ... X -1,389.59 -6,272.87Bill Pmt -Cheque 12/27/2019 1783 Banff Fire & Safety X -271.98 -6,544.85Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... X -98.53 -6,643.38Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/17/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices X -102.45 -6,745.83Transfer 01/27/2020 X -500,000.00 -506,745.83


Total Cleared Transactions -506,745.83 -506,745.83

Cleared Balance -506,745.83 60,191.63


Pay Cheque 07/17/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,246.67 -1,246.67Pay Cheque 07/29/2019 Ian A Taylor -1,316.52 -2,563.19Bill Pmt -Cheque 11/29/2019 1777 Planning Protocol 2 ... -1,501.50 -4,064.69Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1788 Birch Consulting -13,650.00 -17,714.69Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1792 Sherri Bureyko -2,565.15 -20,279.84Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1793 Waste Connections ... -1,418.99 -21,698.83Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1791 Oldman River Regio... -1,025.00 -22,723.83Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1787 AUMA -949.03 -23,672.86Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1790 FCM -100.40 -23,773.26Bill Pmt -Cheque 01/31/2020 1789 Cochrane Foothills ... -20.00 -23,793.26



Register Balance as of 01/31/2020 -530,539.09 36,398.37


Cheque 02/13/2020 1794 Karen Hall -2,600.00 -2,600.00Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/14/2020 Debit Epcor Energy Sevices -114.52 -2,714.52Bill Pmt -Cheque 02/16/2020 Debit Cochrane Lake Gas ... -98.53 -2,813.05



Ending Balance -533,352.14 33,585.32




Nov 30, 19

Beginning Balance 550,000.00Cleared Balance 550,000.00

Register Balance as of 11/30/2019 550,000.00

New TransactionsCheques and Payments - 1 item -550,000.00Deposits and Credits - 1 item 500,000.00

Total New Transactions -50,000.00

Ending Balance 500,000.00

9:12 PM Summer Village of Ghost Lake 02/15/20 Reconciliation Summary T D Canada Trust - Investments, Period Ending 11/30/2019



Dec 31, 19


Cheques and Payments - 1 item -550,000.00

Total Cleared Transactions -550,000.00

Cleared Balance 0.00

Register Balance as of 12/31/2019 0.00

New TransactionsDeposits and Credits - 1 item 500,000.00

Total New Transactions 500,000.00





Jan 31, 20

Beginning Balance 0.00Cleared Transactions

Deposits and Credits - 1 item 500,000.00

Total Cleared Transactions 500,000.00

Cleared Balance 500,000.00

Register Balance as of 01/31/2020 500,000.00





Dec 31, 19

ASSETSCurrent Assets

Chequing/SavingsBank - TD Canada Trust 556,327.92

Total Chequing/Savings 556,327.92

Accounts ReceivableTaxes Receivable -894.77

Total Accounts Receivable -894.77

Other Current AssetsOther Assets 63.00

Total Other Current Assets 63.00

Total Current Assets 555,496.15

Fixed AssetsAccum Deprn - Buildings -115,292.39Accum Deprn - Eng Str Breakwatr -3,253.52Accum Deprn - Eng Str Roads -163,332.90Accum Deprn - Eng Str Water -1,623.21Accum Deprn - Land Improvements -95,545.27Accum Deprn - Machinery & Equip -26,127.22Accum Deprn - Vehicles -19,396.98Assets - Buildings 430,297.76Assets - Eng Struc - Breakwater 7,284.00Assets - Eng Struct - Roads 595,780.89Assets - Eng Struct - Water 4,298.00Assets - Land 36,969.61Assets - Land Improvements 130,765.62Assets - Machinery & Equipment 38,054.43Assets - Vehicles 25,022.00

Total Fixed Assets 843,900.82

TOTAL ASSETS 1,399,396.97

LIABILITIES & EQUITYLiabilities

Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable

Accounts Payable 13,951.38

Total Accounts Payable 13,951.38

Other Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable - Accrued 25.00Development Deposit 13,750.00Excess Collections 197.63GST/HST Payable -6,957.17Receiver General Payable 169.93Reserves - Bylaw 5,000.00Reserves - Capital Works 156,992.85Reserves - Contingency 69,513.19Reserves - Fire Operating 12,223.22Reserves - General Opr 2,500.00Reserves - Library Operating 740.39Reserves - MR Reserves 33,682.21Reserves - MSI Interest 34.00Reserves - Planning Committee 7,290.00Reserves - Rec & Parks 6,784.21Reserves - Recreation Board_ 7,641.46Reserves - Recreation Goods Opr 500.00Reserves - Roads Opr 221.40

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Balance Sheet

As of December 31, 2019



Dec 31, 19

Unearned Income 92,007.00Unearned MSI Capital 56,625.18

Total Other Current Liabilities 458,940.50

Total Current Liabilities 472,891.88

Total Liabilities 472,891.88

EquityEquity in Fixed Assets 843,900.70Operating Fund Surplus 51,957.19Net Income 30,647.20

Total Equity 926,505.09

TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 1,399,396.97


As of December 31, 2019



Jan 31, 20

ASSETSCurrent Assets

Chequing/SavingsBank - TD Canada Trust 36,398.37

Total Chequing/Savings 36,398.37

Accounts ReceivableTaxes Receivable -894.77

Total Accounts Receivable -894.77

Other Current AssetsOther Assets 63.00T D Canada Trust - Investments 500,000.00

Total Other Current Assets 500,063.00

Total Current Assets 535,566.60

Fixed AssetsAccum Deprn - Buildings -115,292.39Accum Deprn - Eng Str Breakwatr -3,253.52Accum Deprn - Eng Str Roads -163,332.90Accum Deprn - Eng Str Water -1,623.21Accum Deprn - Land Improvements -95,545.27Accum Deprn - Machinery & Equip -26,127.22Accum Deprn - Vehicles -19,396.98Assets - Buildings 430,297.76Assets - Eng Struc - Breakwater 7,284.00Assets - Eng Struct - Roads 595,780.89Assets - Eng Struct - Water 4,298.00Assets - Land 36,969.61Assets - Land Improvements 130,765.62Assets - Machinery & Equipment 38,054.43Assets - Vehicles 25,022.00

Total Fixed Assets 843,900.82

TOTAL ASSETS 1,379,467.42

LIABILITIES & EQUITYLiabilities

Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable

Accounts Payable 213.05

Total Accounts Payable 213.05

Other Current LiabilitiesAccounts Payable - Accrued 25.00Development Deposit 13,750.00Excess Collections 197.63GST/HST Payable -7,202.22Receiver General Payable 169.93Reserves - Bylaw 5,000.00Reserves - Capital Works 156,992.85Reserves - Contingency 69,513.19Reserves - Fire Operating 12,223.22Reserves - General Opr 2,500.00Reserves - Library Operating 740.39Reserves - MR Reserves 33,682.21Reserves - MSI Interest 34.00Reserves - Planning Committee 7,290.00Reserves - Rec & Parks 6,784.21Reserves - Recreation Board_ 7,641.46Reserves - Recreation Goods Opr 500.00Reserves - Roads Opr 221.40


As of January 31, 2020



Jan 31, 20

Unearned Income 90,982.00Unearned MSI Capital 56,625.18

Total Other Current Liabilities 457,670.45

Total Current Liabilities 457,883.50

Total Liabilities 457,883.50

EquityEquity in Fixed Assets 843,900.70Operating Fund Surplus 82,604.39Net Income -4,921.17

Total Equity 921,583.92

TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 1,379,467.42


As of January 31, 2020



OLD

BUSINESS


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

ALBERTA

TRANSPORTATION

Office ofthe MinisterDeputy Government House Leader

MLA, Calgary-Hays

December 12, 2019 AR78344

His Worship John WalshMayorSummer Village of Ghost LakeBox 19554 RPO South Cranston

Calgary, AB T3M 0V4

Dear Mayor Walsh:

Thank you for your November 27, 2019 letter regarding the Highway 1A wideningproject. I appreciate the time you took to write.

Alberta Transportation has been negotiating with the Stoney Nakoda Nation for manyyears to acquire the necessary land required to upgrade Highway 1A west of Cochrane.The recently announced agreement between the Nation and Alberta Transportation is aresult of these negotiations.

In 1999, the department began an alignment study with involvement from the SummerVillage of Ghost Lake, which provided its comments and concerns to the department.The department had ongoing communication with the Summer Village about the projectuntil 2011, when the engineering design work was paused until the land transferagreement with the Stoney Nakoda Nation could be completed. With the signing of theland transfer agreement, the engineering work will resume, and there will be ongoingcommunication with the Summer Village on the project in the future. The SummerVillage will have the opportunity to comment on a number of aspects of the project;however, the highway alignment is set, as it was integral to the agreement and cannotbe altered or changed.

We recognize that there will be some impacts to residents of the summer village andsurrounding area as part of this project. In order to keep area residents informed, therewill be some form of public information session, although an exact date is not yetavailable. Department staff and/or the engineering consultant will continue to update theSummer Village as the project moves forward.

.../2

320 Legislature Building, 10800-97 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Canada Telephone 780-427-2080 Fax 780-422-2002

Printed on recycled paper


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

His Worship John Walsh AR 78344Page 2

The main Alberta Transportation contact for the Summer Village of Ghost Lakeregarding this project will be Mr. Darren Davidson, Regional Director. Should you haveany questions, please contact Mr. Davidson by dialling 310-0000, then 403-381-5533,or by emailing [email protected].

Thank you for sharing your concerns. I hope this information is helpful.

Sincerely,

N Ly

Ric Mclver

Minister

cc: Miranda Rosin, MLAfor Banff-Kananaskis

Darren Davidson, Regional Director, Alberta Transportation


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Request For Decision

Re: ICF update

BACKGROUND

The Summer Village and the MD of Bighorn are currently engaged in the development of an Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework (ICF). As part of the discussions the issue of how to deal with the Summer Village lease of the waterfront and the legislated requirements associated with approvals and permits for activities on the leased land came up. The position from the MD of Bighorn was that annexation of the leased land was possibly the most ideal solution. If successful, an annexation of the leased lands from the MD of Bighorn would simplify many of our current processes. We would no longer require outside approval, except for approval from the landowner (TransAlta), for fireworks or to burn the burn pit. This land would also qualify for grant funding that we are currently exempt from and allow the Village to invest in Capital projects such without the concern that the land is not within our municipal boundaries.

ISSUE

1. If Council chooses to move forward with the option of Annexation, there will be some costs

involved including a full survey of the lands affected and public consultations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. If Council determines that they would like to approach the MD of Bighorn regarding the annexation of the waterfront then a meeting between the 2 parties, CAO’s and Mayor/Reeve should be initiated immediately.

2. Direct administration to include costs in the 2020 final budget

Submitted by: Sherri Bureyko

February 18, 2020


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Ghost Lake/Waiparous/Bighorn ICF/IDP Meeting 2 Summary

SV of Ghost Lake Elements November 14, 2019

Attendees: Martin Buckley - MD of Bighorn Greg Birch - SV of Ghost Lake and SV of Waiparous

Background

These notes summarize the second meeting between Martin Buckley and Greg Birch regarding the Alberta Municipal Government Act’s requirements that Intermunicipal Collaboration Frameworks (ICFs) and Intermunicipal Development Plans (IDPs) be prepared between adjacent municipalities. The meeting took place on November 14th, 2019. As with the first meeting, ICF and IDP issues with both the Summer Village of Ghost Lake and the Summer Village of Waiparous relative to the Municipal District (MD) of Bighorn were discussed at the meeting but these notes summarize only the Ghost Lake issues. A separate set of notes summarizes Waiparous issues.

The discussion at this second meeting focussed primarily on the issues and questions raised at the first meeting. Hence this summary reflects outcomes and direction to be used in preparing the ICF. In that a waiver from the IDP requirement is being sought by the two municipalities, the outcomes from the IDP discussions during the first meeting will be implemented through amendments to the respective municipalities’ Municipal Development Plans.

Process Items Follow-up

• Martin said that he would forward an initial draft ICF to Greg in the coming week or two based on the template the MD of Bighorn has used elsewhere. We can then discuss how best to adjust that template for the Bighorn/Ghost Lake ICF.

• It was again confirmed that the ICF format used by the MD will be adjusted so that all intermunicipal agreements are attached to the ICF as schedules.

• Greg informed Martin that the Summer Village of Ghost Lake does not have a logo to use on the ICF cover page. We can just use the municipal names without logos.

• Regarding the ICF document and its establishment of an Intermunicipal Collaboration Committee, Martin and Greg agreed that the Committee should comprise only one Council member each, not two as in the MD’s ICF template.

• For final ICF adoption by the respective municipal Councils, Martin suggested a two-step process. The draft ICF would first be put before each municipal Council as an item to be accepted as information. If either Council has an issue with the draft, this would be raised at the meeting and direction given to the two representatives (Martin and Greg) to address the concern. This step can be repeated as necessary. Once the two Councils accept the draft ICF as information without requesting changes, adopting bylaws would be drafted and presented to both municipal Councils at approximately the same time. The expectation is that the bylaws would be adopted without any changes through three consecutive readings given at the same meeting.

of 1 4


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Ghost Lake ICF Items Follow-up

1. Municipal Fire Response • Martin: Confirmed that the existing agreement with the MD is satisfactory and can be added

to the ICF binder.

Associated Item #1 - Martin: He confirmed that the MD is not interested in the fire fighting equipment (axes,

etc.) that SVGL no longer needs.

Associated Item #2 - Martin: Regarding the two underground water storage tanks the MD has and probably does

not need (at least not the one in Dead Man’s Flats), Martin indicated that this will likely not be an easy decision for Bighorn Council to make due to internal (non- SVGL) concerns. He again suggested that SVGL investigate the cost of alternatives, particularly the cost of simply installing a new water tank, and delay making any request to the MD of Bighorn until it has this information. That said, if SVGL wants to request one of the water storage tanks, they should make an official, written request to the MD Reeve and Council.

2. Library Hosting and Access • Martin: Confirmed the MD’s willingness to keep the existing system, with shared use of the

book depository hosted in SVGL’s community building. • Greg: - Has obtained a copy of Marigold Library System’s agreement with its members and this can

be referenced in the ICF but need not be included. All three municipalities are listed members.

- The ICF should note that the book depository is available to residents of both municipalities.

3. Weed Inspection • Martin: The MD is willing to assist with weed inspection and this can be added to the ICF,

probably without the need for a stand alone agreement.

4. Waste Management • Martin: - The MD of Bighorn does not have capacity to pick up any SVGL waste or recyclables. The

garbage truck’s capacity is about 25 cubic yards, so the 8 - 12 cubic yards required for SVGL material would be about half a load.

- Further, the MD is not close enough to any threshold to be considering expansion of its collection service at this time. Therefore, do not include this item in the ICF.

- Regarding the potential to dispose of yard waste at the Francis Cooke Landfill, SVGL will need to investigate this on its own. It is likely that this regional facility will not take waste from non-member areas.

• Greg: Will make the suggested telephone call to the Bow Valley Waste Management Commission regarding disposal of SVGL yard waste for compost, as Martin suggested, and inform SVGL.

5. Subdivision and Development Approval Authority • Martin: The MD’s Planning Department does not have capacity or interest in this so do not

include it in ICF.

of 2 4


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

6. Shared Subdivision and Development Appeal Board (S/DAB) • Martin: - Establishing a regional or joint S/DAB would be difficult and the MD is not interested in

making the necessary S/DAB bylaw, etc. changes. Leave this out of ICF. - The Summer Village may want to independently contact the MD of Bighorn’s S/DAB

members to see if they would be willing to provide SVGL with assistance when needed.

7. Bylaw Enforcement • Martin: Despite his earlier thought that there may be some bylaw enforcement capacity,

there is not. Hence this is not an ICF topic.

8. Emergency Response • Martin: - There is no MD of Bighorn interest in taking on SVGL’s emergency response obligations. - We should cite the Calgary area mutual aid agreement that both MD and SVGL belong to in

the ICF. This is what Bighorn has done in other ICFs. - As per last meeting’s agreement regarding joint training or exercises, put a clause in the

ICF that would read something like “Both parties will extend invitations to the other …”.

9. Bow River Water Management • Martin: The MD does not see this as an element for inclusion in the ICF.

10. Road Maintenance and Snow Removal • Both parties: As agreed at the previous meeting, internal roads will not be an ICF item.

11. Stoney First Nation and Reserve Lands • Both parties: As agreed at the previous meeting, this will not be an ICF item.

Ghost Lake IDP Items Follow-up

In that the IDP requirement is likely to be waived, the two municipalities will have to amend their MDPs.

1. TransAlta Lease Lands • Martin: - Although there are other remedies (as discussed at the previous meeting), the MD’s

administration prefers the idea of SVGL pursuing annexation of a small area of land from the MD of Bighorn that includes the lease area.

- The best way to initiate this is for the Mayor, Reeve and two CAOs to have a discussion and determine a path forward. In particular, they should decide on annexation versus lease approval (pursuant to the Municipal Government Act) as solution options.

- Hopefully the two municipalities can establish some direction in this regard in the next few months, before ICF finalization.

• Greg: We will have to figure out an innovative way to address this issue in the ICF.

2. Highway 1A Realignment • Martin: - This has become a more important issue since the last meeting. - This issue should be discussed at the previously suggested Mayor, Reeve and CAOs meeting

(regarding the TransAlta lease). • Greg: The SVGL position in this regard (to align the municipal boundary with the realigned

Highway 1A) is contained as a policy in the current draft of the SVGL Municipal Development Plan.

of 3 4


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

3. Land Use Intentions in Adjoining Area • Both parties: These can be addressed when the municipalities amend their respective

Municipal Development Plans.

Next Meeting

The next ICF negotiating meeting will be on December 12, 2019. The focus will be on preparing the ICF in light of the above decisions and directions.

of 4 4


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

RSA 2000 Section 109 MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT Chapter M-26

83

Consideration of principles 109 Before municipal authorities are amalgamated, the Minister must consider the principles, standards and criteria on amalgamation established under section 76.

1994 cM-26.1 s109

Amalgamation order 110 The Lieutenant Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may by order amalgamate municipal authorities to form a new municipality.

1994 cM-26.1 s110

Contents of order 111 An order to amalgamate municipal authorities may

(a) dissolve one or more of the councils of the municipal authorities that are amalgamated,

(b) provide for an interim council,

(c) require a municipal authority to pay compensation to another municipal authority set out in the order or by means determined in the order, including arbitration under the Arbitration Act, and

(d) deal with any of the matters referred to in section 89. 1994 cM-26.1 s111

Official administrator 112 When a municipality is formed by amalgamation and there is no council, the Minister may appoint an official administrator who has all the powers and duties of a council of the municipality until the first council of the municipality is sworn into office.

1994 cM-26.1 s112

Division 6 Annexation

Mediation 112.1 In this Division, “mediation” in respect of an annexation means a process involving a neutral person as mediator who assists the initiating municipal authority and the one or more municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed, and any other person brought in with the agreement of those municipal authorities, to reach their own mutually acceptable settlement of the matter by structuring negotiations, facilitating communication and identifying the issues and interests of the participants.

1999 c11 s6


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


84

Application 113 This Division does not apply to the annexation of land

(a) from an improvement district to another improvement district, or

(b) from a special area to another special area. 1994 cM-26.1 s113

Restriction on annexation 114 No order that annexes land to a municipal authority may be made if the land to be annexed is not contiguous with the boundaries of the municipal authority.

1994 cM-26.1 s114

Annexations of same land 115(1) A municipal authority may not initiate or proceed with more than one proposed annexation at any one time concerning the same land.

(2) A municipal authority may not initiate or proceed with a proposed annexation when the municipal authority is proceeding with an amalgamation, unless the annexation is of the type referred to in section 103(2).

1994 cM-26.1 s115

Initiation of annexation 116(1) A municipal authority initiates the annexation of land by giving written notice of the proposed annexation to

(a) the one or more municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed,

(a.1) the Minister,

(b) the Municipal Government Board, and

(c) all local authorities having jurisdiction to operate or provide services in the initiating municipal authority or in any of the municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed.

(2) The notice for an annexation must

(a) describe the land proposed to be annexed,

(b) set out the reasons for the proposed annexation, and

(c) include proposals for


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


85

(i) consulting with the public about the proposed annexation, and

(ii) meeting with the owners of the land to be annexed, and keeping them informed about the progress of the negotiations.

RSA 2000 cM-26 s116;2017 c13 s1(12)

Direct negotiations 117(1) The municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed must, on receipt of the notice under section 116, meet with the initiating municipal authority to discuss the proposals included in the notice and negotiate the proposals in good faith.

(2) If there are matters on which there is no agreement, the initiating municipal authority and the one or more municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed must, during the negotiations, attempt to use mediation to resolve those matters.

1994 cM-26.1 s117;1999 c11 s7

Report on negotiations 118(1) On conclusion of the negotiations, the initiating municipal authority must prepare a report that describes the results of the negotiations and that includes

(a) a list of the matters agreed on and those on which there is no agreement between the municipal authorities,

(a.1) if there were matters on which there was no agreement, a description of the attempts to use mediation and, if mediation did not occur, the reasons for this,

(b) a description of the public consultation processes involved in the negotiations, and

(c) a summary of the views expressed during the public consultation processes.

(2) The report must be signed by the initiating municipal authority and by the municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed that are prepared to sign and must include a certificate by the initiating municipal authority stating that the report accurately reflects the results of the negotiations.

(3) A municipal authority that does not sign the report may include in the report its reasons for not signing.

1994 cM-26.1 s118;1999 c11 s8


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


86

Disposition of report 119(1) The initiating municipal authority must submit the completed report to the Municipal Government Board and send a copy of it to the municipal authorities from which the land is to be annexed and any other local authority the initiating municipal authority considers would be affected.

(2) If the initiating municipal authority indicates in the report that it wishes to proceed with the annexation, the report becomes the initiating municipal authority’s application for the annexation.

1994 cM-26.1 s119

General agreement on proposed annexation 120(1) If the initiating municipal authority wishes the annexation to proceed and the Municipal Government Board is satisfied that the affected municipal authorities and the public are generally in agreement with the annexation, the Board must notify the Minister and all the local authorities that it considers would be affected by the annexation, and anyone else the Board considers should be notified, that

(a) there appears to be general agreement with the proposed annexation, and

(b) unless objections to the annexation are filed with the Board by a specified date, the Board will make its recommendation to the Minister without holding a public hearing.

(2) If no objections are filed with the Board by the specified date, the Board must

(a) consider the principles, standards and criteria on annexation established under section 76, and

(b) prepare a written report with its recommendations and send it to the Minister.

(3) If objections are filed with the Board by the specified date, the Board

(a) may investigate, analyze and make findings of fact about the annexation, including the probable effect on local authorities and on the residents of an area, and

(b) must conduct one or more hearings in respect of the annexation and allow any affected person to appear before the Board at a hearing.

1994 cM-26.1 s120


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


87

No general agreement on proposed annexation 121 If the initiating municipal authority wishes the annexation to proceed and the Municipal Government Board is not satisfied that the affected municipal authorities or the public are in general agreement with the annexation, the Board

(a) must notify the Minister and all the local authorities that it considers would be affected by the annexation, and anyone else the Board considers should be notified, that there is not general agreement with the proposed annexation,

(b) may investigate, analyze and make findings of fact about the annexation, including the probable effect on local authorities and on the residents of an area, and

(c) must conduct one or more hearings in respect of the annexation and allow any affected person to appear before the Board at a hearing.

1994 cM-26.1 s121

Notice of hearing and costs 122(1) The Municipal Government Board must publish a notice of a hearing under section 120(3) or 121 at least once a week for 2 consecutive weeks in a newspaper or other publication circulating in the affected area, the 2nd notice being not less than 6 days before the hearing.

(2) The Municipal Government Board may determine the costs of and incidental to a hearing and decide by whom and to whom the costs are to be paid.

(3) Section 502 applies to a decision of the Board relating to costs under this section.

1994 cM-26.1 s122

Board’s report 123 After one or more hearings under section 120(3) or 121 have been held and after considering the reports and representations made to it and the principles, standards and criteria on annexation established under section 76, the Board must prepare a written report of its findings and recommendations and send it to the Minister.

1994 cM-26.1 s123

Contents of report 124(1) A report by the Municipal Government Board to the Minister under this Division must set out


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


88

(a) a recommendation on whether land should be annexed to the initiating municipal authority or other municipal authority;

(b) if it is recommending annexation, a description of the land, whether there should be revenue sharing and any terms, conditions and other things the Board considers necessary or desirable to implement the annexation.

(2) If the Board does not recommend that land be annexed in its report, the Board must provide the report to all local authorities that it considers would be affected by the annexation.

1994 cM-26.1 s124

Annexation order 125 The Lieutenant Governor in Council, after considering the report of the Board, may by order annex land from a municipal authority to another municipal authority.

1994 cM-26.1 s125;1996 c30 s5

Annexation order without report 126 Despite sections 116 to 125, the Lieutenant Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may by order annex land to a municipal authority.

1994 cM-26.1 s126;1996 c30 s6

Contents of order 127(1) An order to annex land to a municipal authority may

(a) require a municipal authority to pay compensation to another municipal authority in an amount set out in the order or to be determined by means specified in the order, including arbitration under the Arbitration Act,

(b) dissolve a municipal authority as a result of the annexation, and

(c) deal with any of the matters referred to in section 89.

(1.1) Where an area of land is the subject of an exemption or deferral granted under section 364.2 by one municipal authority and an order referred to in subsection (1) annexes all or part of that land to another municipal authority, the order must require the receiving municipal authority to continue the exemption or deferral in respect of the annexed land, subject to any terms the Lieutenant Governor in Council considers appropriate.

(2) Where under section 664.2 a municipality has paid compensation to a landowner for conservation reserve that is subsequently annexed by order to another municipality, the order must require the municipality to which the land is annexed to pay


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

RSA 2000 Section 127.1 MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT Chapter M-26

89

compensation to the other municipality in the same amount that was paid to the landowner.

RSA 2000 cM-26 s127;2016 c24 s13.1;2017 c13 s2(4);2019 c6 s2

Public utilities 127.1(1) In this section, “utility agreement” means an agreement approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission in which a municipality grants a right to a person to provide a public utility in all or part of the municipality.

(2) An annexation of land does not affect any right under a utility agreement to provide a public utility on the annexed land unless the annexation order provides otherwise.

(3) This section does not apply to a right to provide a natural gas service if the right is subject to section 23 of the Gas Distribution Act.

RSA 2000 cM-26 s127.1;2007 cA-37.2 s82(17)

Annexation refused 128 If an application for an annexation of land is refused, the Minister must notify the initiating municipal authority of the refusal and the initiating municipal authority may not make another annexation application concerning the same land for a period of one year after it receives notice of the refusal.

1994 cM-26.1 s128

Regulations 128.1 The Minister may make regulations

(a) respecting procedures to be followed under this Division;

(b) defining terms used in this Division but not defined in this Act.

2015 c8 s13

Division 7 Dissolution

Application 129 This Division does not apply to the dissolution of a municipality as a result of an annexation.

1994 cM-26.1 s129

Viability review 130(1) The Minister must, before a municipality is dissolved,

(a) undertake a viability review, and


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


90

(b) after completing the viability review, hold a vote of the electors of the municipality on the proposed dissolution.

(2) The Minister may undertake a viability review in respect of a municipality if

(a) the Minister receives a request for a viability review from the council of the municipality,

(b) the Minister receives a sufficient petition requesting a viability review from electors of the municipality numbering at least 30% of the municipality’s population or, in the case of a summer village, a sufficient petition requesting the review from a number of the electors of the summer village equal to at least 50% of the number of summer village residences in the summer village, or

(c) the Minister believes a viability review is warranted.

(3) A viability review must be conducted in a manner determined by the Minister.

(4) If the Minister receives a request in accordance with subsection (2)(a) or a sufficient petition in accordance with subsection (2)(b) and in the Minister’s opinion a process other than a viability review is more appropriate, the Minister may require that that process be undertaken instead of undertaking a viability review.

RSA 2000 cM-26 s130;2013 c9 s2;2016 c24 s14

Completion of viability review 130.1 After completing a viability review, the Minister may

(a) by order direct the council or the chief administrative officer to take any actions, based on the results of the viability review, that the Minister considers appropriate to ensure the viability of the municipality, or

(b) hold a vote of the electors of the municipality on whether the municipality should

(i) be dissolved, or

(ii) not be dissolved, but be required to take any actions, based on the results of the viability review, that the Minister considers appropriate to ensure the viability of the municipality.

2013 c9 s2


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


91

Vote 130.2(1) A vote held under section 130.1(b) must be conducted in accordance with the Local Authorities Election Act as modified by directions given by the Minister.

(2) If the electors vote that the municipality should be dissolved, the Minister must recommend to the Lieutenant Governor in Council that the municipality be dissolved in accordance with section 133.

(3) If the electors vote that the municipality should not be dissolved, the Minister must by order direct the council or the chief administrative officer to take the actions referred to in section 130.1(b)(ii).

2013 c9 s2

Dismissal 130.3 If an order of the Minister under section 130.1(a) or 130.2(3) is not carried out to the satisfaction of the Minister, the Minister may dismiss the council or any member of it or the chief administrative officer of the municipality, and section 574(3) to (6) apply in respect of the dismissal.

2013 c9 s2

131 and 132 Repealed 2013 c9 s3.

Dissolution order 133(1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may by order dissolve a municipality.

(2) A dissolution order

(a) must direct that all or part of the land in the dissolved municipality becomes part of another municipal authority,

(b) may deal with any of the matters referred to in section 89, and

(c) may appoint a liquidator and specify the liquidator’s powers, duties and functions.

1994 cM-26.1 s133;1995 c24 s19


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


92

Tax 134 If the liabilities of the dissolved municipality exceed its assets, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may authorize the successor of the dissolved municipality to impose an additional tax under Part 10 on property located in the area of the dissolved municipality to pay for those excess liabilities.

1994 cM-26.1 s134;1998 c24 s5

Transitional 134.1(1) In this section, “amending Act” means the Municipal Government Amendment Act, 2013.

(2) A dissolution study that was commenced, but not completed, before the coming into force of the amending Act may, as determined by the Minister, be continued

(a) as a dissolution study under and in conformity with this Act as it read before the coming into force of the amending Act, or

(b) as a viability review under and in conformity with this Act as it reads after the coming into force of the amending Act.

2013 c9 s4

Division 8 General Provisions

Effect of certain orders 135(1) When an order under this Part has the effect of including or placing an area of land that was in one municipal authority, called in this section the “old municipal authority”, in another municipal authority, called in this section the “new municipal authority”, as a result of an annexation or the formation, amalgamation or dissolution of a municipal authority, then, unless the order provides otherwise,

(a) the new municipal authority becomes the successor of the old municipal authority with respect to that area of land and the old municipal authority ceases to have any jurisdiction with respect to that area of land,

(a.1) all taxes due to the old municipal authority are deemed to be arrears of taxes due to the new municipal authority and may be collected and dealt with by the new municipal authority as if it had imposed the taxes,

(a.2) all rights of action and actions by or against the old municipal authority that relate to that area of land become rights of action and actions by or against the new municipal


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


93

authority and cease to be rights of action and actions by or against the old municipal authority,

(b) all the assets, liabilities, rights, duties, functions and obligations of the old municipal authority that relate to that area of land automatically pass to the new municipal authority and cease to be those of the old municipal authority,

(c) in the case of an amalgamation or an annexation, if at the time of the notice under section 103 or 116 any land or any portion of it is designated or required to be provided as a public utility lot, environmental reserve, conservation reserve, municipal reserve or municipal and school reserve under Part 17 or a former Act as defined in Part 17, on the amalgamation or annexation taking effect the ownership of the land becomes vested in the new municipal authority in place of the old municipal authority, and

(d) bylaws and resolutions of the old municipal authority that apply specifically to the area of land continue to apply to it until repealed or others are made in their place by the new municipal authority.

(2) If the land referred to in subsection (1)(c) is sold or money instead of land is received by the old municipal authority after a notice of amalgamation under section 103 or a notice of annexation under section 116 is received, the proceeds of the sale or the money received must be paid to the new municipal authority.

(3) The new municipal authority may only use the proceeds of the sale or the money received for purposes for which the old municipal authority could have used it.

(4) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may

(a) authorize the council of the new municipal authority to impose an additional tax under Part 10 on the area of land to meet obligations under a borrowing made by the old municipal authority in respect of that area of land, or

(b) make any provision necessary to protect any rights that any person has in relation to the area of land.

(4.1) The Minister may direct the transfer of assets and liabilities from one municipal authority to another.

(5) This section does not abrogate or affect agreements described in section 30 or 45.

RSA 2000 cM-26 s135;2017 c13 s1(13)


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


94

Power to effectuate transfer of land and other property 136 Where an order under this Division requires the ownership of land or other property to be transferred to a municipal authority, the Minister may do whatever is necessary to give effect to section 135(1) or a direction under section 135(4.1).

1994 cM-26.1 s136

Transitional and other matters 137(1) An order of formation, change of status, amalgamation, annexation or dissolution may, in respect of any municipal authority affected by the order, contain provisions dealing with the following:

(a) assessment and taxation;

(b) property;

(c) employees;

(d) any matter required to properly effect or deal with the formation, change of status, amalgamation, annexation or dissolution, whether transitional or otherwise;

(e) the application, addition, change or substitution of this or another enactment to give effect to the order.

(2) The provisions referred to in subsection (1) may deal with rights, obligations, liabilities, assets and any other thing that the Lieutenant Governor in Council considers is appropriate to be dealt with in the order and may operate despite a collective agreement.

(3) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may amend or repeal a provision referred to in subsection (1) that is contained in an order of formation, change of status, amalgamation, annexation or dissolution without having to comply with the requirements for passing the original order.

1994 cM-26.1 s137

Retroactivity of orders 138(1) An order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council under this Part may provide

(a) for the retroactive application of the order or any of its provisions, and

(b) that the order or any of its provisions come into force on different dates.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


95

(2) An order or any of its provisions may only be made retroactive to a date in the year immediately before the calendar year in which the order is made.

(3) Any error in any order made under this Part may be corrected by subsequent order, and the correcting order may be made effective as of the date of the original order or on some other later date that is specified in the order.

1994 cM-26.1 s138

Orders published 139(1) An order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the Minister made under this Part must be published in The Alberta Gazette.

(2) Publication of an order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the Minister made under this Part is conclusive proof of the fulfilment of any conditions precedent to the order.

1994 cM-26.1 s139

Regulations Act 140 The Regulations Act does not apply to an order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the Minister made under this Part.

1994 cM-26.1 s140

Location of boundaries 141(1) In this section,

(a) “survey” means a survey made under the Surveys Act or the Canada Lands Surveys Act (Canada);

(b) “surveyed land” means land that has been surveyed under the Surveys Act or the Canada Lands Surveys Act (Canada).

(2) Where the boundary of a municipality is described by reference to the boundary of a township or section of surveyed land along which a road allowance runs, the boundary is the side of the road allowance on which monuments or posts are placed under a survey, except in the case of correction lines or where the description otherwise specifies.

(3) In the case of correction lines, the boundary is the south side of the road allowance.

(4) Where a road is the boundary of a municipality and land is acquired to widen the road, the land acquired automatically falls within that boundary.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


96

(5) A road allowance between an Indian reserve and a municipality is in the municipality despite anything to the contrary in this section.

(6) Where a boundary of a municipality is described by reference to a river, the boundary is the right bank of the river facing downstream unless the description otherwise specifies.

1994 cM-26.1 s141

Part 4.1 City Charters

Interpretation 141.1(1) In this Part,

(a) “charter”, except in sections 141.3 and 141.4, includes an amendment to a charter;

(b) “charter city” means a city for which a charter is established under section 141.3.

(2) In this Part, a reference to “this Act” includes a regulation made under this Act.

2015 c8 s14

Purpose of Part 141.2 The purpose of this Part is to authorize the establishment of charters to address the evolving needs, responsibilities and capabilities of cities in a manner that best meets the needs of their communities.

2015 c8 s14

Establishment of charter 141.3 On request by a city, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may, by regulation, establish a charter for that city.

2015 c8 s14

Proposed charter must be published on website 141.4(1) Before a charter is established or amended, the Minister must ensure the proposed charter or amendment is published on the Minister’s department’s website for at least 60 days.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to

(a) a charter or an amendment made after considering any responses to a proposed charter or amendment that was published in accordance with subsection (1),

(b) the repeal of a provision that, pursuant to section 141.5(3), makes inapplicable, modifies or replaces a provision of this


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


Re: IDP update

BACKGROUND

Bill 25, the Red Tape Reduction Implementation Act was passed on November 28, 2019 and came into force on January 1, 2020. One of the changes affected how municipalities deal with IDP’s. The Municipal Government Act was amended as follows: 631(2) Subsection (1) does not require municipalities to adopt an intermunicipal development plan with each other if they agree that they do not require one, but any of the municipalities may revoke its agreement at any time by giving written notice to the other or others, and where that notice is given the municipalities must comply with subsection (1) within one year from the date of the notice unless an exemption is ordered under subsection (3).

ISSUE

1. Due to the changes in the legislation a Memorandum of Agreement is now required between the

two municipalities

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Approve the signing of the MOU between the MD of Bighorn and the Summer Village of Ghost Lake, agreeing not to enter into an Intermunicipal Development Plan at this time


February 18, 2020


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

ALBERTA

MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS

Office of the MinisterMLA, Edmonton - South West

AR99547

JAN 1 5 2020

His Worship John Walsh Reeve Dene CooperMayor Municipal District of BighornSummer Village of Ghost Lake Box 310Box 19554 RPO South Cranston Exshaw AB TOL 2C0

Calgary AB T3M 0V4

Dear Mayor Walsh and Reeve Cooper,

Thank you for the letter of December 4, 2019, from Ms. Sherri Bureyko,Chief Administrative Officer for the Summer Village of Ghost Lake, regarding anIntermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) exemption for the Summer Village of Ghost Lakeand the Municipal District of Bighorn.

Under the recently passed Bill 25, the Red Tape Reduction Implementation Act,municipalities with a common boundary may enter into an agreement to exemptthemselves from completing an IDP if they believe the IDP is not necessary. There is norequirement to file an exemption resolution with Municipal Affairs.

For more information on IDPs, please contact Mike Kahn, Planning Advisor, toll-free at310-0000, then 780-644-1575, or by email at [email protected].

Should you have any questions regarding Intermunicipal Collaboration Frameworks,please contact Michael ScheidI, Manager, Intermunicipal Relations, toll-free at 310-0000then 780-415-1197, or by email at [email protected].

Yours very truly.

wlinister

cc: Sherri Bureyko, Chief Administrative Officer, Summer Village of Ghost LakeRobert Ellis, Chief Administrative Officer, Municipal District of BighornMike Kahn, Planning Advisor, Municipal AffairsMichael ScheidI, Manager, Intermunicipal Relations, Municipal Affairs

132 Legislature Building, 10800 - 97 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Canada Telephone 780-427-3744 Fax 780-422-9550

Printed on recycUdpaper Summer Village of Ghost Lake Regular Council Meeting

Feb 18, 2020 of 89

7.3.2 EXEMPTION MOA.GHOST.LAKE.20200125.docx

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

Between

THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BIGHORN (hereinafter referred to as “the M.D.”)

-and-

THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE (hereinafter referred to as “Ghost Lake”)

INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 631(2) of the amended Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, RSA 2000 (“MGA”), municipalities are no longer required to adopt an intermunicipal development plan (“IDP”) with each other if they agree that they do not require one; AND WHEREAS the M.D and Ghost Lake have previously petitioned the Minister of Municipal Affairs for an exemption from the earlier requirement to adopt an IDP, as mandated under the MGA (prior to its amendment by the Red Tape Reduction Implementation Act, Chapter 22, Statutes of Alberta 2019; AND WHEREAS, in the aforementioned petition to the Minister, the two municipalities cited the following reasons for seeking an exemption:

- lack of any growth pressures for either municipality along the adjoining boundaries; - historically, no intermunicipal planning disputes between the M.D. and the Summer

Village; - a significant part of the boundary between the two municipalities is the Bow River,

thus precluding development; and - another significant part of Ghost Lake’s boundary is adjacent to the Stoney First

Nations’ lands (Stoney Indian Reserve 142, 143, 144), thus precluding development; NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Councils for the Municipal District of Bighorn and the Summer Village of Ghost Lake hereby agree as follows:

That the two municipalities do not require an Intermunicipal Development Plan.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the municipalities have executed this Agreement on February , 2020. MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BIGHORN

SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE

Dene Cooper, Reeve John Walsh, Mayor

Robert Ellis, C.A.O. Sherri Bureyko, C.A.O.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


Re: Boulevard Bylaw

BACKGROUND

At the Annual Meeting in 2008 concerns were brought forward to council about RV’s, boats, and trailers being parked on public boulevards. Council and administration spent the next 2 years developing a bylaw to address these concerns. On November 9, 2010 Second reading of Bylaw 204 was defeated and it was shelved indefinitely. The public engagement conducted as part of the Municipal Development Plan indicated that this issue has

reemerged as a concern within the community.

Enforcement is an issue to be considered as there currently is no Bylaw officer.

The original Parking Bylaw has been updated in this draft to include storage or dumping of items on the

road right of ways.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Review the amendments and options provided to the original Parking Bylaw 2. Provide direction to administration for areas requiring more research or changes. 3. Determine if additional public engagement is necessary on this topic


February 18, 2020


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

UNADOPTED

DRAFT

SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE BYLAW 204

BEING A BYLAW OF THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO CONTROL AND REGULATE THE PARKING OF RECREATION VEHICLES AND BOAT AND UTILITY TRAILERS ON ROAD RIGHT OF WAYS. 1. ENACTMENT This Bylaw may be cited as the "Summer Village of Ghost Lake RV and Trailer Parking Bylaw.” WHEREAS The Traffic Safety Act, being Chapter T-6 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000 and amendments thereto makes provision for passage of bylaws relating to the regulation and control of vehicle, animal and pedestrian traffic; WHEREAS Sections 7(d) and 7(i) of the Municipal Government Act, being Chapter M- 26.1 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, and amendments thereto, authorizes a municipality to pass bylaws respecting transport and transportation systems and to enforce such bylaws; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake in the Province of Alberta duly assembled enacts as follows: 2. INTERPRETATION In this Bylaw, including this Section, unless the context otherwise requires, all definitions shall be defined in Section 1 of the Traffic Safety Act, being Chapter T-6 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, and all regulations and amendments thereto. (a) “boat trailer” means a trailer designed for recreation use for carrying a marine

boat and is towed by a motor vehicle;

(b) “municipal council” means the Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake; (c) “municipality” means the Summer Village of Ghost Lake, a municipal

corporation in the Province of Alberta and where the context so requires means the area contained within the corporate boundaries of the said municipality;

(d) "peace officer" means a bylaw enforcement officer appointed by Council to enforce the provisions of this Bylaw and includes a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and, when authorized, a Special Constable.

(e) “recreational vehicle” means a vehicle, or a portable structure designed to be either carried on a motor vehicle or towed behind a motor vehicle, the primary


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

UNADOPTED

DRAFT

Summer Village of Ghost Lake Bylaw 204

Page 2 of 5

purpose of which is to provide temporary living accommodation for travel and/or for recreational purposes, and without restricting the generality of the foregoing includes motor homes, travel trailers, fifth wheel trailers, tent trailers, and truck campers;

(f) “road right of way” means any thoroughfare, street, road, driveway, lane, alley, causeway, or other place or any part of any of them, whether publicly or privately owned, that the public is ordinarily entitled or permitted to use for the passage or parking of vehicles and includes (i) a boulevard adjacent a roadway, and (ii) if a ditch lies adjacent to and parallel with the roadway, the ditch.

(g) “utility trailer” means a trailer designed for general use and is towed by a motor vehicle including by not limited to small box trailers, flat bed trailers, stock/horse trailers, pole trailers and van trailers. Includes both homemade and manufactured trailers.

3. PARKING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES: (1) An owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall not park a recreational vehicle

on a road right of way:

(a) except in the area of the road right of way immediately adjoining the owner or operator’s place of residence, or with permission of the owner or occupant of the residence and

(b) for more than 72 consecutive hours, following which the owner or operator shall move the recreational vehicles to an off road right of way location for a period of not less than 48 consecutive hours before the recreational vehicle may be parked again in the same area of the road right of way.

(2) Where any type of motor vehicle has removable camping accommodation installed on it, the operator or owner of the vehicle or any person in charge of the vehicle either permanently or temporarily, shall not leave the camping accommodation or other removable portion of the vehicle used for this purpose on any portion of a road right of way after same has been removed from the motor vehicle.

(3) No owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall park a recreational vehicle on any road right of way in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to other persons using the roadway.

(4) Recreational vehicles parked on private property must not overhang the property line.

(5) When a recreational vehicle is parked on a road right of way and is in


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

UNADOPTED

DRAFT


Page 3 of 5

violation of a provision of this Bylaw or regulation, it may be removed and impounded and the cost thereof charged against the owner and/or operator of the said vehicle.

4. PARKING BOAT AND UTILITY TRAILERS: (1) An owner or operator of a boat or utility trailer shall not park a boat or utility

trailer on a road right of way during the months of October through April: (a) except in the area of the road right of way immediately adjoining

the owner or operator’s place of residence, or with permission of the owner or occupant of the residence and

(b) for more than 72 consecutive hours, following which the owner or operator shall move the boat or utility trailer to an off road right of way location for a period of not less than 48 consecutive hours before the boat or utility trailer may be parked again in the same area of the road right of way.

(2) No owner or operator of a boat or utility trailer shall park a recreational vehicle on any road right of way in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to other persons using the roadway.

(3) Boat or utility trailers parked on private property must not overhang the property line.

(4) When a boat or utility trailer is parked on a road right of way and is in violation of a provision of this Bylaw or regulation, it may be removed and impounded and the cost thereof charged against the owner and/or operator of the said trailer.

5. PENALTIES: (1) Where a Peace Officer believes that any person has contravened any

provision of this bylaw, he may (a) serve upon such person a violation ticket as defined by the

Provincial Offences Procedures Act, Chapter P-21.5; or (b) tow the recreation vehicle.

(2) A violation ticket will be deemed to have been sufficiently served: (a) if served personally on the accused; or (b) if sent by registered mail; or (c) if left at the accused’s usual place of abode with an inmate

thereof who appeared to be at least 18 years of age or over; or (d) if sent by regular mail.

(3) All violation tickets issued must contain the section of the bylaw which was contravened, provide for a voluntary payment amount pursuant to the


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

UNADOPTED

DRAFT


Page 4 of 5

provisions of this bylaw; and/or provide for a date, time and location for an appearance in Court should the accused exercise his right to defend any charge(s) pursuant to the provisions of this bylaw.

(4) Any person who commits a contravention of any of the provisions of this bylaw will be liable upon summary conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction, to a fine not exceeding $2,500.00 plus costs and, in default of payment, to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days. This bylaw shall come into effect upon final reading thereof.

Read a first and second time this 4th day of February, 2009. BYLAW DID NOT RECEIVE THIRD READING – NOT PASSED


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

UNADOPTED

DRAFT


Page 5 of 5

SCHEDULE A

Schedule of Fines All Violations $ 150


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE

BYLAW 240

BEING A BYLAW OF THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO CONTROL AND REGULATE THE USE OF ROAD RIGHT OF WAYS. WHEREAS The Traffic Safety Act, being Chapter T-6 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000 and amendments thereto makes provision for passage of bylaws relating to the regulation and control of vehicle, animal and pedestrian traffic; WHEREAS Sections 7(d) and 7(i) of the Municipal Government Act, being Chapter M-26.1 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, and amendments thereto, authorizes a municipality to pass bylaws respecting transport and transportation systems and to enforce such bylaws; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake in the Province of Alberta duly assembled enacts as follows: 1. NAME OF BYLAW

This Bylaw shall be known as the “Summer Village of Ghost Lake Boulevard Bylaw”

2. DEFINITIONS

In this Bylaw, including this Section, unless the context otherwise requires, all definitions shall be defined in Section 1 of the Traffic Safety Act, being Chapter T-6 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, and all regulations and amendments thereto.

(a) “boat” means any marine vessel propelled on water by oars, sails, or an engine;

(b) “boat trailer” means a trailer designed for recreation use for carrying a boat and is towed by a motor vehicle;

(c) “Chief Administrative Officer” means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Summer

Village of Ghost Lake and whatever subsequent title may be conferred on that officer by Council or Statue;

(d) “emergency vehicle” means an emergency vehicle as defined in the Traffic Safety Act;

(e) “object” means any item not usually found in the natural environment. This may include but is not limited to refuse, household items, boxes or storage bins, planters, mechanical parts or equipment, and marine equipment;

(f) “obstruction” means an encroachment, excavation, structure, object or other obstacle which interferes with, or prevents the vision, passage, maintenance or use of any public property by vehicles or pedestrians;

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

(g) “provincial ticket” means a ticket as defined in the Provincial Offences Procedure Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. P-34.

(h) “municipal council” means the Council of the Summer Village of Ghost lake;

(i) “municipality” means the Summer Village of Ghost Lake, a municipal corporation in the Province of Alberta and where the context so requires means the area contained within the corporate boundaries of the said municipality;

(j) “municipal ticket” means a ticket in a form as approved by the Chief Administrative Officer, issued by the Summer Village allowing for the voluntary payment of a fine established under this Bylaw

(k) “peace officer” means (i) a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; (ii) a Bylaw Officer as appointed by the Summer Village to enforce bylaws

of the Summer Village, or (iii) a Community Peace Officer as appointed by the Solicitor General of

Alberta;

(l) “person” means any individual, business, partnership, firm, corporation, occupant of a residence, or owner of a vehicle;

(m)“recreational vehicle” means a vehicle, or a portable structure designed to be either carried on a motor vehicle or towed behind a motor vehicle, the primary purpose of which is to provide temporary living accommodation for travel and/or for recreational purposes, and without restricting the generality of the foregoing includes motor homes, travel trailers, fifth wheel trailers, tent trailers, and truck campers;

(n) “road right of way” means any thoroughfare, street, road, driveway, lane, alley, causeway, or other place or any part of any of them, whether publicly or privately owned, that the public is ordinarily entitled or permitted to use for the passage or parking of vehicles and includes

i) a boulevard adjacent a roadway, and ii) if a ditch lies adjacent to and parallel with the roadway, the ditch.

(i) “utility trailer” means a trailer designed for general use and is towed by a motor vehicle

including but not limited to small box trailers, flat bed trailers, stock/horse trailers, pole trailers and van trailers. Includes both homemade and manufactured trailers;

3. PARKING RECREATION VEHICLES (see last page for alternative option)

1) An owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall not park a recreational vehicle on a road right of way:

a) except in the area of the road right of way immediately adjoining the owner or operator’s place of residence, or with permission of the owner or occupant of the residence; and

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

b) for more than 72 consecutive hours, following which the owner or operator shall move the recreational vehicles to an off road right of way location for a period of not less than 48 consecutive hours before the recreational vehicle may be parked again in the same area of the road right of way.

2) Where any type of motor vehicle has removable camping accommodation installed on it,

the operator or owner of the vehicle or any person in charge of the vehicle either permanently or temporarily, shall not leave the camping accommodation or other removable portion of the vehicle used for this purpose on any portion of a road right of way after same has been removed from the motor vehicle.

3) No owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall park a recreational vehicle on any road right of way in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to other persons using the roadway.

4) Recreational vehicles parked on private property must not overhang the property line.

5) When a recreational vehicle is parked on a road right of way and is in violation of a

provision of this Bylaw or regulation, it may be removed and impounded and the cost thereof charged against the owner and/or operator of the said vehicle.

4. PARKING BOAT AND UTILITY TRAILIERS

1) An owner or operator of a boat or utility trailer shall not park a boat or utility trailer on a road right of way during the months of October through May:

a) except in the area of the road right of way immediately adjoining the owner or operator’s place of residence, or with permission of the owner or occupant of the residence and

b) for more than 72 consecutive hours, following which the owner or operator shall move the boat or utility trailer to an off road right of way location for a period of not less than 48 consecutive hours before the boat or utility trailer may be parked again in the same area of the road right of way.

2) No owner or operator shall park a boat or utility trailer on any road right of way in such a

manner as to constitute a hazard to other persons using the roadway. 3) Boat or utility trailers parked on private property must not overhang the property line. 4) When a boat or utility trailer is parked on a road right of way and is in violation of a

provision of this Bylaw or regulation, it may be removed and impounded and the cost thereof charged against the owner and/or operation of the said trailer.

5. OBSTRUCTIONS

1) Any person placing or causing to be placed any gravel, dirt, objects or other obstruction

on Summer Village property, including road right of ways, without written approval from the Chief Administrative Officer or designate, shall remove or cause the removal

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

thereof as soon as reasonably possible and, in any event no later than 48 hours after notification to do so by the Chief Administrative Officer or designate. After 48 hours, or such time as specified by the Chief Administrative Officer or designate, the Summer Village may remove the obstruction, perform all necessary repairs and charge the costs thereof to the person causing the obstruction.

2) No owner of an abandoned or broken-down vehicle, or the person in charge of the vehicle, shall park or leave the vehicle on the road right of way in the municipality for a period longer than 24 hours.

6. EXEMPTIONS

1) Nothing in this Bylaw prohibits police vehicles, bylaw enforcement vehicles, ambulances, fire trucks or any other emergency vehicle as well as vehicles engaged in road repair, maintenance or inspection from being parked on the roadways by their operators in the performance of their duties.

7. REMOVAL OF VEHICLES, TRAILERS, OBSTRUCTIONS 1) Any Peace Officer is hereby authorized to remove or cause to be removed any vehicle,

trailer, boat, or obstruction that is in contravention of any of the provisions of this Bylaw.

8. FINES

1) A person who contravenes any provision of this Bylaw is guilty of an offence and liable upon summary conviction to a fine as prescribed in Schedule A of this Bylaw.

2) The amount of the fines shown in Schedule "A" of this Bylaw may be amended by resolution of Council from time to time.

9. MUNICIPAL AND PROVINCIAL TICKETS

1) Any Peace Officer or who has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that any person has contravened any provision of this Bylaw, may issue and serve:

a) A Municipal Ticket allowing payment of the specified penalty to The Summer Village; or

b) A Provincial Ticket according to the provisions of the Provincial Offences Procedure Act, as amended.

2) Service of a Municipal or Provincial Ticket will be sufficient if it is: a) personally served; or b) attached and left upon a recreational vehicle in respect of which the offence is

alleged to have been committed; or c) served by regular mail to the person’s last known mailing address.

3) If a Provincial ticket is issued in respect of an offence, the ticket may:

a) specify the fine amount established by this Bylaw for the offence; or

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

b) require a person to appear in Court without the alternative of making a voluntary payment.

4) A person who commits an offence may:

a) If a Provincial ticket is issued in respect of the offence; and b) If the Provincial ticket specifies the fine amount established by this Bylaw for

the offence, make a voluntary payment equal to the specified fine by delivering the Provincial ticket and the specified fine to the Provincial Court Office specified on the Provincial ticket.

10. SEVERABILITY

1) If any part of this Bylaw is found to be invalid, then that part shall be severed, and the remaining Bylaw will continue to be in force.

THAT this Bylaw shall take effect on the date of the third and final reading and upon signing by the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer.

Read a first time this _______ day of ___________________ 2020

Read a second time this _______ day of ___________________ 2020

Read a third and final time this _______ day of _________________ 2020

________________________

Mayor

_________________________

Chief Administrative Officer

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

SCHEDULE “A” To Bylaw 240 – Boulevard Bylaw

SCHEDULE OF FINES Section 3 - PARKING RECREATION VEHICLES First offence $150 Second offence within 1 year $500 Third and subsequent offences within 1 year

$1,000

Section 4 - PARKING BOAT AND UTILITY TRAILERS First offence $150 Second offence within 1 year $500 Third and subsequent offences within 1 year

$1,000

Section 5 - OBSTRUCTIONS First offence $150 Second offence within 1 year $500 Third and subsequent offences within 1 year

$1,000

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

ALTERNATE OPTION FOR MANAGING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES PARKING ON

BOULEVARDS

PARKING RECREATION VEHICLES

1) An owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall not park a recreational vehicle on a

road right of way unless a permit has been issued by the Chief Administrative Officer.

2) Where any type of motor vehicle has removable camping accommodation installed on it, the operator or owner of the vehicle or any person in charge of the vehicle either permanently or temporarily, shall not leave the camping accommodation or other removable portion of the vehicle used for this purpose on any portion of a road right of way after same has been removed from the motor vehicle.

3) No owner or operator of a recreational vehicle shall park a recreational vehicle on any road right of way in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to other persons using the roadway.

4) Recreational vehicles parked on private property must not overhang the property line.

5) When a recreational vehicle is parked on a road right of way and is in violation of a

provision of this Bylaw or regulation, it may be removed and impounded and the cost thereof charged against the owner and/or operator of the said vehicle.

APPLICATION FOR PERMITS AND ISSUANCE 1) An application for a permit must be in writing on the prescribed form and be

submitted to the Chief Administrative Officer 15 days in advance of the date required. Only complete forms will be accepted for review.

2) On receiving a complete application for a permit, the Chief Administrative Officer may:

a) Issue the permit, or b) Refuse to issue the permit, providing the applicant with written notice

including a reason for the refusal

3) Permits will only be issued for Recreational Vehicles to be parked in a municipal road right of way for a period of no more than 96 hours in a 30-day period.

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

4) Permits will only be issued for use during special events such as, but not limited to, Regatta, Weddings, Family Reunions, and long weekends.

5) Permits are non-transferable

6) Permits must be visibly posted on the Recreational Vehicle at all times it is parked in a

municipal road right of way.

7) Permits will only be issued to park a recreational vehicle in a road right of way immediately adjoining the applicants or operator’s place of residence, or with written permission of the owner or occupant of an alternate residence.

*Application Form and Permit to be developed if this option is selected

DRAFT to

replace

Bylaw 204


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

CORRESPONDANCE


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Log in / Sign up

December 5, 2019

AUMA has long advocated for a more equitable police funding model to address RCMP vacancies and the risingcosts of policing while improving community safety. We have been equally clear in our advocacy that any newfunding model must take into consideration a municipality’s ability to pay for policing services, and that payingfor policing must give municipalities a say in the delivery of police service in their community.

On December 4, 2019, the provincial government announced a new police costing model that applies to urbanmunicipalities with populations under 5,000 and all municipal districts and counties. The model reflects many ofAUMA’s recommendations, such as use of population and equalized assessment to simulate demand and abilityto pay, and the establishment of an Alberta Police Advisory Board with equal representation from AUMA andRMA to guide the implementation of the new model. The funds generated by this new model, a total of $286million over five years, will be invested in frontline law enforcement, with the federal government contributing anadditional $85.6 million to rural policing.

Communities will be eligible for subsidies that consider factors that may affect local policing costs:

Shadow population: This takes into account costs associated with providing services to populations thatdon't live in a community and therefore don't contribute to its property tax base.

Crime Severity Index (CSI): A community will be eligible for a subsidy if its average CSI over a three-yearperiod is higher than the average for rural Alberta. CSI is a measurement used by Statistics Canada thatplaces greater statistical weight on serious offences.

Distance from RCMP detachment: This recognizes that communities without a detachment mayexperience longer response times.

Enhanced officer positions: Communities with existing "enhanced" RCMP positions (officers employed bycommunities at their own expense) will no longer be billed for those positions.

More work to come

AUMA is very concerned with the proposed timelines for implementation, which suggest that invoices will beissued as early as next spring, well after municipal budgets have been set for 2020. We are working withsenior staff at the Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General to see if the implementation of the new model can bedelayed in order to align with the 2021 municipal budgeting process, and we will pass along any furtherinformation once it becomes available.

Municipalities are already in a challenging position financially. Local governments are continually required tomake tough economic decisions, since, unlike the other two orders of government, they cannot run financial

New police costing model unveiled37 2 0


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

https://auma.ca/home

https://auma.ca/home

https://auma.ca/user

https://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xID=6724033D52FC5-A45E-6C07-D8F3A8606FD5C88A

deficits. We recognize that absorbing these policing costs will be a significant undertaking for somemunicipalities given these current fiscal realities.

Now available: detailed information about cost impacts to municipalities

The Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General has provided additional information for AUMA members, includinga spreadsheet for all costs, as well as sample calculations. Download them directly below, or visit our policinghub for more information on AUMA's policing advocacy.

Distribution of costs by municipalitySample calculations

Feel free to contact our Advocacy staff if you have any questions about this issue, and watch for an email fromAUMA President Barry Morishita with further information.

Back to news


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

http://auma.ca/advocacy-services/programs-initiatives/policing-hub

https://auma.ca/sites/default/files/pfm_municipal_tables_0.xlsx

https://auma.ca/sites/default/files/example_calculation_sheet_2.docx

mailto:[email protected]

https://auma.ca/news

1

[email protected]

From: JSG PSD Engagement <[email protected]>Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 4:32 PMTo: Undisclosed recipients:Subject: Police Funding Model Billing

Good afternoon, As you are aware, the police funding model comes into effect April 2020. In response to a request from RMA and AUMA, discussions have been occurring between Justice & Solicitor General and Municipal Affairs regarding the timing of invoicing for the new police funding model. Municipal Affairs has expressed support for RMA and AUMA’s request, as have senior officials within Justice and Solicitor General. As a result, it is our intent to bill in January 2021 for the first year of the police funding model (April 2020 ‐ March 2021). We hope that this timing will alleviate some of the concerns regarding the police funding model’s impact on 2020 municipal budget planning. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e‐mail.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

4

To: '[email protected]'; ! TSHUKALAK; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'

Cc: Lisa GagnierSubject: Police Funding ModelAttachments: PFM Municipal Tables.xlsx; PFM Example Calculation Sheet.docx

Follow Up Flag: Follow upFlag Status: Flagged

Good afternoon, I want to take this opportunity to share with you some further information regarding the police funding model. Understandably, many of you have been asking questions about what the model means for your municipality so that you may appropriately budget for the coming year. I think the attached spreadsheet will be helpful in answering those questions. In the attached spreadsheet, I’ve included the factors for the model and how those factors were used to calculate the total cost share. This is available for all 291 municipalities. In addition, I have also included an example calculation sheet that provides further detail into how we applied the model. We have been having productive conversations with our colleagues in Justice and Solicitor General regarding the potential to change the billing cycle to better align with municipal budget cycles. Further conversations with Municipal Affairs and Treasury Board and Finance will occur. Please hold questions regarding the invoicing process as we will be in touch when that decision is finalized. I hope the attached information will provide municipal leaders with useful information. Thank you, Lisa Lisa Gagnier, MA Manager, Research and Policy Public Security Division Alberta Justice and Solicitor General 780-644-2786 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e‐mail.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

1 | P a g e

Example Calculation Sheet – Police Funding Model Scenario: If province were to distribute 10% of the costs of frontline policing = $23.25M

BASE MODEL

Muni population x $23.25M x 50% = Weighted population cost Total population

Municipal equalized assessment x $23.25M x 50% = Weighted equalized assessment cost Total equalized assessment

Weighted equalized assessment cost + weighted population cost = TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST

MODIFIERS (Subsidies)

Crime Severity Index (CSI)

Muni CSI 3 year average - Total CSI average = Muni CSI points above average

Muni CSI points above average x 0.05% (subsidy per muni CSI point > average) = CSI % subsidy

CSI % subsidy x TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST = CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY

Shadow Population

Muni shadow population = Shadow pop % subsidy (max 5%) Muni population

Shadow pop % subsidy x TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST = SHADOW POPULATION DOLLAR

SUBSIDY

Detachment

No detachment in community = Base Cost x subsidy (5%) = DETACHMENT DOLLAR SUBSIDY

YEARLY COST TO MUNICIPALITY = TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST - CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY - SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY - DETACHMENT DOLLAR SUBSIDY


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

2 | P a g e

Municipality A: Large specialized municipality Weighted population cost $547,595

= 36,072 x 23.25M x 50%

765,780

Weighted equalized assessment cost

$1,738,859 = 42,670,899,320 x 23.25M x 50% 285,272,766,093

TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $2,286,454 = 547,595 + 1,738,859 Muni CSI points above avg 349.96 = 465.21 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 17.5% = 349.96 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $400,087* = 17.5% x 2,286,454 (*rounding difference) Shadow pop % subsidy 4.6% = 33,119 = 1.001 (max 0.05)

36,072

SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $104,964 = 5% x 2,286,454 NO DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $0 = 0 YEARLY COST TO MUNICIPALITY

$1,781,403 = 2,286,454 - 400,087 - 104,964

Municipality B: Mid-sized municipal district Weighted population cost $119,456 = 7,869 x 23.25M x 50%

765,780


$83,317 = 2,044,554,084 x 23.25M x 50% 258,272,776,093

TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $202,773 = 119,456 + 83,317 Muni CSI points above avg 0 = 76.35 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 0% = 0 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 202,773 Shadow pop % subsidy 0% = none reported SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 202,773 NO DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $0 = 0 YEARLY COST TO MUNICIPALITY

$202,773 = 202,773 - 0 - 0

Municipality C: Small summer village Weighted population cost $1,108 = 73 x 23.25M x 50%

765,780


$656 = 16,108,372 x 23.25M x 50% 285,272,776,093

TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $1,765 = 1108 + 656 Muni CSI points above avg 59.30 = 174.55 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 3% = 59.30 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $52* = 3% x 1,765 (*rounding difference) Shadow pop % subsidy 0% = none reported SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 1,765 DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $88 = no detachment = 5% x 1,765 YEARLY COST TO MUNICIPALITY

$1,625 = 1,176 - 52 - 88


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Weighting 50% 50%

0.05% per Mun CSI

point above Average 5% 5%

100% reimbursement

Year

Cost Recovery Options - Frontline Policing

Population affected

Total Equalized Assessment

Total Share Policing Cost

CSI subsidy given

Shadow Population

subsidy given

Detachment subsidy

givenPFM Revenue

Generated

Enhanced Policing

subsidy givenNet Revenue Generated

2020-21 10% 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 23,250,000$ 604,279$ 105,532$ 92,301$ 22,447,888$ 7,040,000$ 15,407,888$

2021-22 15% 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 34,900,000$ 907,068$ 158,411$ 138,551$ 33,695,970$ 7,040,000$ 26,655,970$

2022-23 20% 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 46,500,000$ 1,208,558$ 211,063$ 184,602$ 44,895,777$ 7,040,000$ 37,855,777$

2023-24 30% 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 69,800,000$ 1,814,137$ 316,822$ 277,101$ 67,391,940$ 7,040,000$ 60,351,940$

2024-25 30% 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 69,800,000$ 1,814,137$ 316,822$ 277,101$ 67,391,940$ 7,040,000$ 60,351,940$

Source: Alberta Municipal Affairs, Municipal Services Branch, 2018 Official Population List

Alberta Municipal Affairs, Municipal Financial and Statistical Data, 2018 Equalized Assessment

Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, CSI Weighted 2015-17 file

Alberta Justice and Solitictor General, Law Enforcement & Oversight Branch, Enhanced Policing Agreements

Alberta Justice and Solitictor General, Law Enforcement & Oversight Branch, "K" Division Detachments by Contract

Police Funding Model (PFM)


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

BASE

PFM Model at 10% Revenue Generated (after subsidies) Total Population Total Equalized Assessment Total CSI Average

Subsidy per

Mun CSI point

above

Average

No Detachment

Subsidy

Cost per enhanced

officer

Nov 1, 2019 15,407,888$ 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 50% 50% 23,250,000$ 115 0.1% 5% 160,000$

STATUS MUNICIPALITY 2018 POPULATION

2018 EQUALIZED

ASSESSMENT % Population

% Equalized

Assessment

Based on

Population

Based on

Equalized

Assessment

Total Share Policing

Cost

Municipal CSI

Value (3

Year Avg)

Mun CSI points

above Average % Subsidy

Dollar

Subsidy

Detachment in

county or town

(0=YES, 1=NO)

Dollar

Subsidy

Police Funding

Model Share

with modifiers

Expected per

capita costs

Number of

Enhanced Policing

Positions (Full-

time)

Dollar costs - 100%

reimbursement

Police Funding

Model Share with

modifiers less

Enhanced Policing

Billing

Expected per

capita costs

Summer Village Summer Village of Argentia Beach 27 78,453,559$ 0.00% 0.03% 410$ 3,197$ 3,607$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 180$ $3,427 $127 -$ 3,427$ 127$

Summer Village Summer Village of Betula Beach 16 21,380,263$ 0.00% 0.01% 243$ 871$ 1,114$ 159 44 2.2% 25$ 1 56$ $1,034 $65 -$ 1,034$ 65$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birch Cove 45 12,024,885$ 0.01% 0.00% 683$ 490$ 1,173$ 96 0.0% -$ 1 59$ $1,114 $25 -$ 1,114$ 25$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birchcliff 117 165,854,963$ 0.02% 0.06% 1,776$ 6,759$ 8,535$ 148 32 1.6% 138$ 1 427$ $7,970 $68 -$ 7,970$ 68$

Summer Village Summer Village of Bondiss 110 55,346,547$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,670$ 2,255$ 3,925$ 175 59 3.0% 117$ 1 196$ $3,612 $33 -$ 3,612$ 33$

Summer Village Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach 84 31,778,434$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,275$ 1,295$ 2,570$ 181 66 3.3% 84$ 1 129$ $2,357 $28 -$ 2,357$ 28$

Summer Village Summer Village of Burnstick Lake 15 24,389,042$ 0.00% 0.01% 228$ 994$ 1,222$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 61$ $1,160 $77 -$ 1,160$ 77$

Summer Village Summer Village of Castle Island 10 12,011,484$ 0.00% 0.00% 152$ 489$ 641$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 32$ $609 $61 -$ 609$ 61$

Summer Village Summer Village of Crystal Springs 51 71,021,451$ 0.01% 0.02% 774$ 2,894$ 3,668$ 211 96 4.8% 176$ 1 183$ $3,309 $65 -$ 3,309$ 65$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ghost Lake 82 49,097,117$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,245$ 2,001$ 3,246$ 78 0.0% -$ 1 162$ $3,083 $38 -$ 3,083$ 38$

Summer Village Summer Village of Golden Days 160 113,602,415$ 0.02% 0.04% 2,429$ 4,629$ 7,058$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 353$ $6,705 $42 1 160,000$ (153,295)$ (958)$

Summer Village Summer Village of Grandview 114 87,143,673$ 0.01% 0.03% 1,731$ 3,551$ 5,282$ 211 96 4.8% 253$ 1 264$ $4,764 $42 -$ 4,764$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Gull Lake 176 87,297,769$ 0.02% 0.03% 2,672$ 3,557$ 6,229$ 187 72 3.6% 223$ 1 311$ $5,695 $32 -$ 5,695$ 32$

Summer Village Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 42 39,833,145$ 0.01% 0.01% 638$ 1,623$ 2,261$ 148 32 1.6% 37$ 1 113$ $2,111 $50 -$ 2,111$ 50$

Summer Village Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 73 16,108,372$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,108$ 656$ 1,765$ 175 59 3.0% 52$ 1 88$ $1,624 $22 -$ 1,624$ 22$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake 228 95,306,437$ 0.03% 0.03% 3,461$ 3,884$ 7,345$ 137 21 1.1% 79$ 1 367$ $6,899 $30 -$ 6,899$ 30$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake South 61 23,112,991$ 0.01% 0.01% 926$ 942$ 1,868$ 193 78 3.9% 73$ 1 93$ $1,702 $28 -$ 1,702$ 28$

Summer Village Summer Village of Itaska Beach 23 35,324,235$ 0.00% 0.01% 349$ 1,439$ 1,789$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 89$ $1,699 $74 -$ 1,699$ 74$

Summer Village Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 213 156,365,447$ 0.03% 0.05% 3,233$ 6,372$ 9,605$ 148 32 1.6% 156$ 1 480$ $8,969 $42 -$ 8,969$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Kapasiwin 10 27,247,096$ 0.00% 0.01% 152$ 1,110$ 1,262$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 63$ $1,199 $120 -$ 1,199$ 120$

Summer Village Summer Village of Lakeview 30 14,703,895$ 0.00% 0.01% 455$ 599$ 1,055$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 53$ $1,002 $33 -$ 1,002$ 33$

Summer Village Summer Village of Larkspur 44 33,980,943$ 0.01% 0.01% 668$ 1,385$ 2,053$ 103 0.0% -$ 1 103$ $1,950 $44 -$ 1,950$ 44$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach 110 87,585,714$ 0.01% 0.03% 1,670$ 3,569$ 5,239$ 211 96 4.8% 251$ 1 262$ $4,726 $43 -$ 4,726$ 43$

Summer Village Summer Village of Mewatha Beach 90 52,528,770$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,366$ 2,141$ 3,507$ 175 59 3.0% 104$ 1 175$ $3,227 $36 -$ 3,227$ 36$

Summer Village Summer Village of Nakamun Park 96 33,027,146$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,457$ 1,346$ 2,803$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 140$ $2,663 $28 -$ 2,663$ 28$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norglenwold 273 199,694,364$ 0.04% 0.07% 4,144$ 8,138$ 12,282$ 148 32 1.6% 199$ 1 614$ $11,469 $42 -$ 11,469$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norris Beach 38 28,899,355$ 0.00% 0.01% 577$ 1,178$ 1,755$ 211 96 4.8% 84$ 1 88$ $1,583 $42 -$ 1,583$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Parkland Beach 153 74,320,898$ 0.02% 0.03% 2,323$ 3,029$ 5,351$ 160 45 2.2% 120$ 1 268$ $4,964 $32 -$ 4,964$ 32$

Summer Village Summer Village of Pelican Narrows 151 65,581,352$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,292$ 2,672$ 4,965$ 181 66 3.3% 163$ 1 248$ $4,554 $30 -$ 4,554$ 30$

Summer Village Summer Village of Point Alison 10 21,712,250$ 0.00% 0.01% 152$ 885$ 1,037$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 52$ $985 $98 -$ 985$ 98$

Summer Village Summer Village of Poplar Bay 103 88,776,417$ 0.01% 0.03% 1,564$ 3,618$ 5,181$ 211 96 4.8% 249$ 1 259$ $4,674 $45 -$ 4,674$ 45$

Summer Village Summer Village of Rochon Sands 86 59,049,955$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,306$ 2,406$ 3,712$ 72 0.0% -$ 1 186$ $3,526 $41 -$ 3,526$ 41$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ross Haven 160 58,991,283$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,429$ 2,404$ 4,833$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 242$ $4,591 $29 -$ 4,591$ 29$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sandy Beach 278 39,664,359$ 0.04% 0.01% 4,220$ 1,616$ 5,837$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 292$ $5,545 $20 -$ 5,545$ 20$

Summer Village Summer Village of Seba Beach 169 150,240,552$ 0.02% 0.05% 2,566$ 6,122$ 8,688$ 159 44 2.2% 192$ 1 434$ $8,062 $48 -$ 8,062$ 48$

Summer Village Summer Village of Silver Beach 65 73,769,854$ 0.01% 0.03% 987$ 3,006$ 3,993$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 200$ $3,793 $58 -$ 3,793$ 58$

Summer Village Summer Village of Silver Sands 160 53,501,927$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,429$ 2,180$ 4,609$ 159 44 2.2% 102$ 1 230$ $4,277 $27 -$ 4,277$ 27$

Summer Village Summer Village of South Baptiste 66 18,839,158$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,002$ 768$ 1,770$ 193 78 3.9% 69$ 1 88$ $1,612 $24 -$ 1,612$ 24$

Summer Village Summer Village of South View 67 18,041,037$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,017$ 735$ 1,752$ 159 44 2.2% 39$ 1 88$ $1,626 $24 -$ 1,626$ 24$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove 81 128,955,221$ 0.01% 0.05% 1,230$ 5,255$ 6,485$ 148 32 1.6% 105$ 1 324$ $6,055 $75 -$ 6,055$ 75$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sundance Beach 73 53,184,719$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,108$ 2,167$ 3,275$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 164$ $3,112 $43 -$ 3,112$ 43$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunrise Beach 135 22,445,602$ 0.02% 0.01% 2,049$ 915$ 2,964$ 193 78 3.9% 115$ 1 148$ $2,700 $20 -$ 2,700$ 20$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunset Beach 49 29,777,363$ 0.01% 0.01% 744$ 1,213$ 1,957$ 193 78 3.9% 76$ 1 98$ $1,783 $36 -$ 1,783$ 36$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunset Point 169 64,179,878$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,566$ 2,615$ 5,181$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 259$ $4,922 $29 -$ 4,922$ 29$

Summer Village Summer Village of Val Quentin 252 48,443,511$ 0.03% 0.02% 3,826$ 1,974$ 5,800$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 290$ $5,510 $22 -$ 5,510$ 22$

Summer Village Summer Village of Waiparous 49 29,599,728$ 0.01% 0.01% 744$ 1,206$ 1,950$ 78 0.0% -$ 1 98$ $1,853 $38 -$ 1,853$ 38$

Summer Village Summer Village of West Baptiste 38 29,999,407$ 0.00% 0.01% 577$ 1,222$ 1,799$ 193 78 3.9% 70$ 1 90$ $1,639 $43 -$ 1,639$ 43$

Summer Village Summer Village of West Cove 149 50,761,731$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,262$ 2,069$ 4,330$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 217$ $4,114 $28 -$ 4,114$ 28$

Summer Village Summer Village of Whispering Hills 142 43,975,052$ 0.02% 0.02% 2,156$ 1,792$ 3,948$ 193 78 3.9% 154$ 1 197$ $3,596 $25 -$ 3,596$ 25$

Summer Village Summer Village of White Sands 120 110,562,837$ 0.02% 0.04% 1,822$ 4,505$ 6,327$ 72 0.0% -$ 1 316$ $6,011 $50 -$ 6,011$ 50$

Summer Village Summer Village of Yellowstone 137 35,116,506$ 0.02% 0.01% 2,080$ 1,431$ 3,511$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 176$ $3,335 $24 -$ 3,335$ 24$

Total Value 5,200 3,022,610,109 78,939$ 123,173$ 202,112$ 3,504$ 10,106$ $188,502 1 160,000$ 28,502$

Subsidy from CSI Value Subsidy for No Detachment Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions

NET IMPACT

Year 1 - 10%CRIME SEVERITY INDEX DETACHMENT

BASE + MODIFIERS

ENHANCED POLICING

Percentages


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

BASE DETACHMENT

PFM Model at 15% Revenue Generated (after subsidies) Total Total Total CSI Average

Subsidy per

Mun CSI

point above

Average

Cost per enhanced

officer

Nov 1, 2019 26,655,970$ 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 50% 50% 34,900,000$ 115 0.1% 0.05 160,000$

Subsidy from CSI Value


2018 EQUALIZED


% Equalized

Assessment

Based on

Population

Based on

Equalized

Assessment


Cost

Municipal CSI

Value (3

Year Avg)

Mun CSI

points above

Average % Subsidy Dollar Subsidy

Detachment

in county or

town (0=YES,

1=NO) Dollar Subsidy

Police Funding

Model Share with

modifiers

Expected per

capita costs

Number of

Enhanced

Policing

Positions (Full-

time)

Dollar costs - 100%

reimbursement

Police Funding Model

Share with modifiers

less Enhanced Policing

Billing

Expected per

capita costs

Summer Village Summer Village of Argentia Beach 27 78,453,559$ 0.00% 0.03% 615$ 4,799$ 5,414$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 271$ 5,144$ 191$ -$ 5,144$ 191$

Summer Village Summer Village of Betula Beach 16 21,380,263$ 0.00% 0.01% 365$ 1,308$ 1,672$ 159 44 2.2% 37$ 1 84$ 1,552$ 97$ -$ 1,552$ 97$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birch Cove 45 12,024,885$ 0.01% 0.00% 1,025$ 736$ 1,761$ 96 0.0% -$ 1 88$ 1,673$ 37$ -$ 1,673$ 37$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birchcliff 117 165,854,963$ 0.02% 0.06% 2,666$ 10,145$ 12,811$ 148 32 1.6% 208$ 1 641$ 11,963$ 102$ -$ 11,963$ 102$

Summer Village Summer Village of Bondiss 110 55,346,547$ 0.01% 0.02% 2,507$ 3,386$ 5,892$ 175 59 3.0% 175$ 1 295$ 5,422$ 49$ -$ 5,422$ 49$

Summer Village Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach 84 31,778,434$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,914$ 1,944$ 3,858$ 181 66 3.3% 126$ 1 193$ 3,539$ 42$ -$ 3,539$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Burnstick Lake 15 24,389,042$ 0.00% 0.01% 342$ 1,492$ 1,834$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 92$ 1,742$ 116$ -$ 1,742$ 116$

Summer Village Summer Village of Castle Island 10 12,011,484$ 0.00% 0.00% 228$ 735$ 963$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 48$ 914$ 91$ -$ 914$ 91$

Summer Village Summer Village of Crystal Springs 51 71,021,451$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,162$ 4,344$ 5,506$ 211 96 4.8% 264$ 1 275$ 4,967$ 97$ -$ 4,967$ 97$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ghost Lake 82 49,097,117$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,869$ 3,003$ 4,872$ 78 0.0% -$ 1 244$ 4,628$ 56$ -$ 4,628$ 56$

Summer Village Summer Village of Golden Days 160 113,602,415$ 0.02% 0.04% 3,646$ 6,949$ 10,595$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 530$ 10,065$ 63$ 1 160,000$ (149,935)$ (937)$

Summer Village Summer Village of Grandview 114 87,143,673$ 0.01% 0.03% 2,598$ 5,331$ 7,928$ 211 96 4.8% 380$ 1 396$ 7,152$ 63$ -$ 7,152$ 63$

Summer Village Summer Village of Gull Lake 176 87,297,769$ 0.02% 0.03% 4,011$ 5,340$ 9,351$ 187 72 3.6% 335$ 1 468$ 8,548$ 49$ -$ 8,548$ 49$

Summer Village Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 42 39,833,145$ 0.01% 0.01% 957$ 2,437$ 3,394$ 148 32 1.6% 55$ 1 170$ 3,169$ 75$ -$ 3,169$ 75$

Summer Village Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 73 16,108,372$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,663$ 985$ 2,649$ 175 59 3.0% 79$ 1 132$ 2,438$ 33$ -$ 2,438$ 33$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake 228 95,306,437$ 0.03% 0.03% 5,195$ 5,830$ 11,025$ 137 21 1.1% 118$ 1 551$ 10,356$ 45$ -$ 10,356$ 45$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake South 61 23,112,991$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,390$ 1,414$ 2,804$ 193 78 3.9% 109$ 1 140$ 2,554$ 42$ -$ 2,554$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Itaska Beach 23 35,324,235$ 0.00% 0.01% 524$ 2,161$ 2,685$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 134$ 2,551$ 111$ -$ 2,551$ 111$

Summer Village Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 213 156,365,447$ 0.03% 0.05% 4,854$ 9,565$ 14,418$ 148 32 1.6% 234$ 1 721$ 13,464$ 63$ -$ 13,464$ 63$

Summer Village Summer Village of Kapasiwin 10 27,247,096$ 0.00% 0.01% 228$ 1,667$ 1,895$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 95$ 1,800$ 180$ -$ 1,800$ 180$

Summer Village Summer Village of Lakeview 30 14,703,895$ 0.00% 0.01% 684$ 899$ 1,583$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 79$ 1,504$ 50$ -$ 1,504$ 50$

Summer Village Summer Village of Larkspur 44 33,980,943$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,003$ 2,079$ 3,081$ 103 0.0% -$ 1 154$ 2,927$ 67$ -$ 2,927$ 67$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach 110 87,585,714$ 0.01% 0.03% 2,507$ 5,358$ 7,864$ 211 96 4.8% 377$ 1 393$ 7,094$ 64$ -$ 7,094$ 64$

Summer Village Summer Village of Mewatha Beach 90 52,528,770$ 0.01% 0.02% 2,051$ 3,213$ 5,264$ 175 59 3.0% 157$ 1 263$ 4,844$ 54$ -$ 4,844$ 54$

Summer Village Summer Village of Nakamun Park 96 33,027,146$ 0.01% 0.01% 2,188$ 2,020$ 4,208$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 210$ 3,997$ 42$ -$ 3,997$ 42$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norglenwold 273 199,694,364$ 0.04% 0.07% 6,221$ 12,215$ 18,436$ 148 32 1.6% 299$ 1 922$ 17,215$ 63$ -$ 17,215$ 63$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norris Beach 38 28,899,355$ 0.00% 0.01% 866$ 1,768$ 2,634$ 211 96 4.8% 126$ 1 132$ 2,376$ 63$ -$ 2,376$ 63$

Summer Village Summer Village of Parkland Beach 153 74,320,898$ 0.02% 0.03% 3,486$ 4,546$ 8,033$ 160 45 2.2% 180$ 1 402$ 7,451$ 49$ -$ 7,451$ 49$

Summer Village Summer Village of Pelican Narrows 151 65,581,352$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,441$ 4,012$ 7,452$ 181 66 3.3% 244$ 1 373$ 6,836$ 45$ -$ 6,836$ 45$

Summer Village Summer Village of Point Alison 10 21,712,250$ 0.00% 0.01% 228$ 1,328$ 1,556$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 78$ 1,478$ 148$ -$ 1,478$ 148$

Summer Village Summer Village of Poplar Bay 103 88,776,417$ 0.01% 0.03% 2,347$ 5,430$ 7,777$ 211 96 4.8% 373$ 1 389$ 7,016$ 68$ -$ 7,016$ 68$

Summer Village Summer Village of Rochon Sands 86 59,049,955$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,960$ 3,612$ 5,572$ 72 0.0% -$ 1 279$ 5,293$ 62$ -$ 5,293$ 62$

Summer Village Summer Village of Ross Haven 160 58,991,283$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,646$ 3,608$ 7,254$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 363$ 6,892$ 43$ -$ 6,892$ 43$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sandy Beach 278 39,664,359$ 0.04% 0.01% 6,335$ 2,426$ 8,761$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 438$ 8,323$ 30$ -$ 8,323$ 30$

Summer Village Summer Village of Seba Beach 169 150,240,552$ 0.02% 0.05% 3,851$ 9,190$ 13,041$ 159 44 2.2% 288$ 1 652$ 12,101$ 72$ -$ 12,101$ 72$

Summer Village Summer Village of Silver Beach 65 73,769,854$ 0.01% 0.03% 1,481$ 4,512$ 5,994$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 300$ 5,694$ 88$ -$ 5,694$ 88$

Summer Village Summer Village of Silver Sands 160 53,501,927$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,646$ 3,273$ 6,919$ 159 44 2.2% 153$ 1 346$ 6,420$ 40$ -$ 6,420$ 40$

Summer Village Summer Village of South Baptiste 66 18,839,158$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,504$ 1,152$ 2,656$ 193 78 3.9% 103$ 1 133$ 2,420$ 37$ -$ 2,420$ 37$

Summer Village Summer Village of South View 67 18,041,037$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,527$ 1,104$ 2,630$ 159 44 2.2% 58$ 1 132$ 2,441$ 36$ -$ 2,441$ 36$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove 81 128,955,221$ 0.01% 0.05% 1,846$ 7,888$ 9,734$ 148 32 1.6% 158$ 1 487$ 9,089$ 112$ -$ 9,089$ 112$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sundance Beach 73 53,184,719$ 0.01% 0.02% 1,663$ 3,253$ 4,917$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 246$ 4,671$ 64$ -$ 4,671$ 64$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunrise Beach 135 22,445,602$ 0.02% 0.01% 3,076$ 1,373$ 4,449$ 193 78 3.9% 173$ 1 222$ 4,053$ 30$ -$ 4,053$ 30$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunset Beach 49 29,777,363$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,117$ 1,821$ 2,938$ 193 78 3.9% 114$ 1 147$ 2,677$ 55$ -$ 2,677$ 55$

Summer Village Summer Village of Sunset Point 169 64,179,878$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,851$ 3,926$ 7,777$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 389$ 7,388$ 44$ -$ 7,388$ 44$

Summer Village Summer Village of Val Quentin 252 48,443,511$ 0.03% 0.02% 5,742$ 2,963$ 8,706$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 435$ 8,270$ 33$ -$ 8,270$ 33$

Summer Village Summer Village of Waiparous 49 29,599,728$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,117$ 1,811$ 2,927$ 78 0.0% -$ 1 146$ 2,781$ 57$ -$ 2,781$ 57$

Summer Village Summer Village of West Baptiste 38 29,999,407$ 0.00% 0.01% 866$ 1,835$ 2,701$ 193 78 3.9% 105$ 1 135$ 2,461$ 65$ -$ 2,461$ 65$

Summer Village Summer Village of West Cove 149 50,761,731$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,395$ 3,105$ 6,500$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 325$ 6,175$ 41$ -$ 6,175$ 41$

Summer Village Summer Village of Whispering Hills 142 43,975,052$ 0.02% 0.02% 3,236$ 2,690$ 5,926$ 193 78 3.9% 231$ 1 296$ 5,399$ 38$ -$ 5,399$ 38$

Summer Village Summer Village of White Sands 120 110,562,837$ 0.02% 0.04% 2,734$ 6,763$ 9,498$ 72 0.0% -$ 1 475$ 9,023$ 75$ -$ 9,023$ 75$

Summer Village Summer Village of Yellowstone 137 35,116,506$ 0.02% 0.01% 3,122$ 2,148$ 5,270$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 263$ 5,006$ 37$ -$ 5,006$ 37$

Total Value 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 17,450,000$ 17,450,000$ 34,900,000$ 907,068$ 138,551$ 33,695,970$ 44 7,040,000$ 26,655,970$

NET IMPACT

Subsidy for No Detachment

BASE + MODIFIERS

Year 2 - 15%Percentages

ENHANCED POLICING

No Detachment Subsidy

CRIME SEVERITY INDEX

Subsidy from Enhanced Policing

Positions


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

BASE


Subsidy per

Mun CSI

point above

Average

Cost per enhanced

officer

Nov 1, 2019 26,655,970$ 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 50% 50% 34,900,000$ 115 0.1% 0.05 160,000$


2018 EQUALIZED


% Equalized

Assessment Based on Population

Based on Equalized

Assessment


Cost

Municipal CSI

Value (3

Year Avg)

Mun CSI

points above


Detachment in

county or town

(0=YES, 1=NO) Dollar Subsidy



Expected per

capita costs

Number of

Enhanced

Policing

Positions (Full-

time)

Dollar costs - 100%

reimbursement


Share with modifiers less

Enhanced Policing Billing

Expected per

capita costs

Summer Village Summer Village of Argentia Beach 27 78,453,559$ 0.00% 0.03% 820$ 6,394$ 7,214$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 361$ 6,853$ 254$ -$ 6,853$ 254$


Summer Village Summer Village of Birch Cove 45 12,024,885$ 0.01% 0.00% 1,366$ 980$ 2,346$ 96 0.0% -$ 1 117$ 2,229$ 50$ -$ 2,229$ 50$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birchcliff 117 165,854,963$ 0.02% 0.06% 3,552$ 13,517$ 17,070$ 148 32 1.6% 277$ 1 853$ 15,939$ 136$ -$ 15,939$ 136$




Summer Village Summer Village of Castle Island 10 12,011,484$ 0.00% 0.00% 304$ 979$ 1,283$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 64$ 1,218$ 122$ -$ 1,218$ 122$



Summer Village Summer Village of Golden Days 160 113,602,415$ 0.02% 0.04% 4,858$ 9,259$ 14,116$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 706$ 13,411$ 84$ 1 160,000$ (146,589)$ (916)$



Summer Village Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 42 39,833,145$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,275$ 3,246$ 4,522$ 148 32 1.6% 73$ 1 226$ 4,222$ 101$ -$ 4,222$ 101$

Summer Village Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 73 16,108,372$ 0.01% 0.01% 2,216$ 1,313$ 3,529$ 175 59 3.0% 105$ 1 176$ 3,248$ 44$ -$ 3,248$ 44$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake 228 95,306,437$ 0.03% 0.03% 6,922$ 7,768$ 14,690$ 137 21 1.1% 158$ 1 734$ 13,798$ 61$ -$ 13,798$ 61$


Summer Village Summer Village of Itaska Beach 23 35,324,235$ 0.00% 0.01% 698$ 2,879$ 3,577$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 179$ 3,398$ 148$ -$ 3,398$ 148$

Summer Village Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 213 156,365,447$ 0.03% 0.05% 6,467$ 12,744$ 19,211$ 148 32 1.6% 311$ 1 961$ 17,939$ 84$ -$ 17,939$ 84$


Summer Village Summer Village of Lakeview 30 14,703,895$ 0.00% 0.01% 911$ 1,198$ 2,109$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 105$ 2,004$ 67$ -$ 2,004$ 67$





Summer Village Summer Village of Norglenwold 273 199,694,364$ 0.04% 0.07% 8,289$ 16,275$ 24,564$ 148 32 1.6% 398$ 1 1,228$ 22,937$ 84$ -$ 22,937$ 84$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norris Beach 38 28,899,355$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,154$ 2,355$ 3,509$ 211 96 4.8% 168$ 1 175$ 3,165$ 83$ -$ 3,165$ 83$








Summer Village Summer Village of Seba Beach 169 150,240,552$ 0.02% 0.05% 5,131$ 12,245$ 17,376$ 159 44 2.2% 384$ 1 869$ 16,123$ 95$ -$ 16,123$ 95$












Summer Village Summer Village of West Baptiste 38 29,999,407$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,154$ 2,445$ 3,599$ 193 78 3.9% 140$ 1 180$ 3,279$ 86$ -$ 3,279$ 86$





Total Value 765,780$ 285,272,776,093$ 23,250,000$ 23,250,000$ 46,500,000$ 1,208,558$ 184,602$ 44,895,777$ 44 7,040,000$ 37,855,777$

NET IMPACT

Year 3 - 20%

Percentages No Detachment Subsidy

Subsidy for No Detachment Subsidy from Enhanced Policing

DETACHMENT

Subsidy from CSI Value

CRIME SEVERITY INDEX

BASE + MODIFIERS

ENHANCED POLICING


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

BASE


Subsidy per

Mun CSI

point above

Average

Cost per enhanced

officer

Nov 1, 2019 60,351,940$ 765,780 285,272,776,093$ 50% 50% 69,800,000$ 115 0.1% 0.05 160,000$


2018 EQUALIZED


% Equalized

Assessment Based on Population

Based on Equalized

Assessment


Cost

Municipal CSI

Value (3

Year Avg)

Mun CSI

points

above


Detachment in

county or town

(0=YES, 1=NO) Dollar Subsidy



Expected per

capita costs

Number of

Enhanced

Policing

Positions (Full-

time)

Dollar costs - 100%

reimbursement


Share with modifiers less

Enhanced Policing Billing

Expected per

capita costs

Summer Village Summer Village of Argentia Beach 27 78,453,559$ 0.00% 0.03% 1,231$ 9,598$ 10,828$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 541$ 10,287$ 381$ -$ 10,287$ 381$


Summer Village Summer Village of Birch Cove 45 12,024,885$ 0.01% 0.00% 2,051$ 1,471$ 3,522$ 96 0.0% -$ 1 176$ 3,346$ 74$ -$ 3,346$ 74$

Summer Village Summer Village of Birchcliff 117 165,854,963$ 0.02% 0.06% 5,332$ 20,291$ 25,623$ 148 32 1.6% 415$ 1 1,281$ 23,926$ 204$ -$ 23,926$ 204$




Summer Village Summer Village of Castle Island 10 12,011,484$ 0.00% 0.00% 456$ 1,469$ 1,925$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 96$ 1,829$ 183$ -$ 1,829$ 183$



Summer Village Summer Village of Golden Days 160 113,602,415$ 0.02% 0.04% 7,292$ 13,898$ 21,190$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 1,059$ 20,130$ 126$ 1 160,000$ (139,870)$ (874)$



Summer Village Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 42 39,833,145$ 0.01% 0.01% 1,914$ 4,873$ 6,787$ 148 32 1.6% 110$ 1 339$ 6,338$ 151$ -$ 6,338$ 151$

Summer Village Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 73 16,108,372$ 0.01% 0.01% 3,327$ 1,971$ 5,298$ 175 59 3.0% 157$ 1 265$ 4,876$ 67$ -$ 4,876$ 67$

Summer Village Summer Village of Island Lake 228 95,306,437$ 0.03% 0.03% 10,391$ 11,660$ 22,051$ 137 21 1.1% 237$ 1 1,103$ 20,711$ 91$ -$ 20,711$ 91$


Summer Village Summer Village of Itaska Beach 23 35,324,235$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,048$ 4,322$ 5,370$ 114 0.0% -$ 1 268$ 5,101$ 222$ -$ 5,101$ 222$

Summer Village Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 213 156,365,447$ 0.03% 0.05% 9,707$ 19,130$ 28,837$ 148 32 1.6% 467$ 1 1,442$ 26,928$ 126$ -$ 26,928$ 126$


Summer Village Summer Village of Lakeview 30 14,703,895$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,367$ 1,799$ 3,166$ 111 0.0% -$ 1 158$ 3,008$ 100$ -$ 3,008$ 100$





Summer Village Summer Village of Norglenwold 273 199,694,364$ 0.04% 0.07% 12,442$ 24,430$ 36,872$ 148 32 1.6% 598$ 1 1,844$ 34,431$ 126$ -$ 34,431$ 126$

Summer Village Summer Village of Norris Beach 38 28,899,355$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,732$ 3,536$ 5,267$ 211 96 4.8% 253$ 1 263$ 4,751$ 125$ -$ 4,751$ 125$








Summer Village Summer Village of Seba Beach 169 150,240,552$ 0.02% 0.05% 7,702$ 18,380$ 26,082$ 159 44 2.2% 576$ 1 1,304$ 24,202$ 143$ -$ 24,202$ 143$












Summer Village Summer Village of West Baptiste 38 29,999,407$ 0.00% 0.01% 1,732$ 3,670$ 5,402$ 193 78 3.9% 210$ 1 270$ 4,921$ 130$ -$ 4,921$ 130$





Total Value 765780 285,272,776,093$ 34,900,000$ 34,900,000$ 69,800,000$ 1,814,137$ 277,101$ 67,391,940$ 44 7,040,000$ 60,351,940$

Subsidy from CSI Value Subsidy for No Detachment Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions

NET IMPACT

Year 4 & 5 - 30%CRIME SEVERITY INDEX DETACHMENT

BASE + MODIFIERS

ENHANCED POLICING

Percentages No Detachment Subsidy


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Municipal Affairs Deputy Minister18th Floor, Commerce Place

10155-102 Street

Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4

Canada

Telephone 780-427-4826

Fax 780-422-9561

AR98385

December 4, 2019

Ms, Sherri BureykoChief Administrative Officer

Summer Village of Ghost LakePC Box 19554

South Cranston

Calgary Alberta T3M 0V4

Dear Ms. Bureyko:

I am pleased to advise that your municipality has been selected to participate in aMunicipal Accountability Program (MAP) review in 2020. A summary of the program isattached.

The MAP review will include an on-site visit to your municipal office and will consist of:• a review of municipal documents; and• discussions with you and, where applicable, your staff regarding policies,

procedures, and processes.

To improve program efficiencies, observance of a council meeting will no longer beincluded in the program as of January 2020.

A report identifying areas of compliance and any legislative gaps that may exist will beprovided to you. In order to assist you in addressing any areas of non-compliance, thereport will also include recommendations and resources specific to each matteridentified. It is my expectation the report generated as a result of the MAP review will beshared with council at a public council meeting.

A municipal accountability advisor will be contacting you in the near future to providefurther details regarding the program as well as discuss requirements and scheduling ofthe MAP review. Scheduling will take into consideration your workload and availability,as well as the council meeting schedule.

...12


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

-2-

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact a municipal accountabilityadvisor with the Municipal Capacity and Sustainability Branch of Municipal Affairstoll-free at 310-0000, then 780-427-2225.

Sincerely,

P .Paul WynnykDeputy Minister

Attachment: MAP Program Summary


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

ALBERTA

MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS

Office ofthe MinisterMLA, Edmonton - South West

AR98902

December 4, 2019

His Worship John WalshMayorSummer Village of Ghost LakePO Box 19554

South Cranston

Calgary AB T3M 0V4

Dear Mayor Walsh,

In August, our government provided $597 million In Interim Municipal Sustalnablllty Initiative(MSI) funding to help municipalities and Metis Settlements move forward with their localpriorities.

I am pleased to confirm the additional $74 million In MSI capital funding announced as part ofBudget 2019. Combined with the Interim funding, municipalities and Metis Settlements will haveaccess to $671 million In MSI funding, $641 million under the capital component and $30 millionunder the operating component.

For the Summer Village of Ghost Lake, the additional MSI capital funding Is $2,432; $1,196under the MSI component and $1,236 under the Basic Municipal Transportation Grant (BMTG)component. When added to the MSI capital funding of $73,660 committed through the InterimSupply In August 2019, your municipality's total capital funding for program year 2019 Is$76,092. Your municipality's MSI operating funding for 2019 remains unchanged at $9,722.

The Future of MSI

Our government committed to helping municipalities meet their Infrastructure needs withpredictable, long-term funding, and Budget 2019 fulfills this commitment.

In 2020, capital funding will be $963 million (Including MSI Capital and BMTG). This representsa 9 per cent reduction from the previous provincial budget. In 2021, capital funding will be $897million (Including MSI Capital and BMTG). This represents a 14 per cent reduction from theprevious provincial budget. In both years, MSI Operating will be $30 million.

Allocation estimates for 2020 and 2021 are now available online at

open.alberta.ca/publicatlons/munlclpal-sustalnabllltv-lnltlatlve-aHocatlon-estlmates-2020-2021.

In 2022 and beyond, funding amounts will be determined by the Local Government FiscalFramework.

...12

Buifcfing, 10800 - 97 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5K2B6 Canada Telephone 780-427-3744 Fax 780-422-9550

Printed on recycled paper Summer Village of Ghost Lake Regular Council Meeting

Feb 18, 2020 of 89

-2-

Locaf Government Fiscal Framework

The Local Government Fiscal Framework replaces the MSI program (including BMTG)beginning in 2022. It includes new legislation passed as part of this year's budget, whichdetermines how much capital funding the province must provide to municipalities every year.The framework also includes $30 million in annual operating funding, though this is notlegislated.

In 2022, municipalities will receive $860 million in capital funding. Calgary and Edmonton willshare $455 million, and other municipalities will share $405 million.

In following years capital funding will change depending on changes in provincial revenue,which means that municipalities will share in the success of the province. The funding amountwill be published two years in advance. For example, the province is legally required to publishthe funding amount for 2023 on or before September 30, 2021. Predictable funding will make iteasier for municipalities to plan for the future and fulfill planning requirements.

Our government is proud to support municipalities through the Local Government FiscalFramework, and I will be seeking municipal support in the next steps of this important work. Thiswill include developing a formula to distribute the funding among municipalities, and determiningthe administrative elements of the program including project eligibility, and application andreporting requirements.

I understand that provincial support is critical for Albertans to receive the infrastructure andservices they expect. Working together, as partners, we can ensure these needs are met andset the course for a prosperous future.

Yours very truly.

Kaycee MaduMinister

cc: Sherri Bureyko, Chief Administrative Officer, Summer Village of Ghost Lake


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Cochrane Foothills Protective Association

Rural Crime Watch December 2019 Newsletter from the Board of Directors

Hello to all CFPA Members. Thank you for your support and communication over the past year. CFPA has grown in membership as well as having increased awareness of the Rural Crime Watch Program in Rocky View County. I would like to give you a bit of an update on some of the activities the CFPA have been involved in this year. 2020 will see Cochrane Foothills Protective Association celebrate our 50th Anniversary of being an Association. We owe a great vote of thanks to the founding members of the CFPA, for their concern for their neighbors and the initiative to connect with the RCMP to develop the partnership in, what we now call Rural Crime Watch. This initiative, started by Harvey Buckley, was the prototype for the current Provincial Rural Crime Watch program was patterned after. The CFPA AGM is booked for April 25th at the Frank Will Memorial Hall in Cochrane where we will be having a celebration of this milestone Anniversary. The Year in Review: As you have seen, over the year, we have been able to grow in our Communication strategies and have also been able to participate in some interesting events this year. In 2019 the CFPA Website has grown and we hope you are finding the resources you need on here. We have recently refreshed the look and have added a Members Only Page to the web site. On the Members Only page, there will be access to relevant RCMP Media Releases, direct access to Reporter – re named See It Say It – as well as other information and documents that are available to Members only. These documents are for Member review only and not for distribution. We are very close to finalizing our push communication platform which will allow Members to receive the fan outs and notices via text message, email, or by phone message. Watch for more information to come out in the New Year. CFPA was invited to attend and support the RCMP Musical Ride when it was in Cochrane. The RCMP Canine Training Unit put on a great display of the talents and capabilities of the teams and it was nice to be able to visit with Members of Cochrane C.O.P, our sister Organization in Crime Prevention in Cochrane. Despite the sudden surge of wind, during the afternoon performance, the Ride carried on and it was a great display of horsemanship and was enjoyable. We also attended and supported the Calgary Police Rodeo, held in Cochrane this year. Thank you for the invite and it was a great day of watching members from all branches of Emergency Services come together and compete in a common platform. There was representation from Municipal Police Services, RCMP, Fire Departments, Alberta Health Services and Sheriffs, to name a few. Great event and well organized. Cochrane RCMP Detachment opened the Morley Community Policing Office at Morley. CFPA was invited to attend the Grand Opening Ceremonies. Many divisions of the RCMP were represented along with the Morley Emergency and Security Services, and other sister agencies. It was an honor and pleasure to watch the Opening Ceremonies and to visit with the Morley and surrounding area residents.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Requests for Community Workshops and presentations continue to be received and organized. We have been involved in the RVC Farm Security Workshop, again this year, provided workshops in various communities on Crime Prevention and the role of the CFPA. We are in the midst of planning a workshop for the Benchlands/Beaupre area for 2020 and invite you to let us know if you would like to have a workshop come to your area. Over the Holidays, as we see on Social Media and hear in the News, thefts of parcels, mail and vehicles continue to be a part of our lives and seem to increase over the holidays. Below is a clever rendition to the Sound of Music – My Favorite Things – that was penned by two very talented ladies in RCMP “K” Division. Parcels on porches and shipments not hidden. Dark unlit door steps and zero cares given. Expensive packages tied up with strings. These are a few of thieves’ favourite things.

Big branded boxes and gift cards a plenty. Letters and parcels and presents so many. Free and unguarded, yes, all of your blings. These are a few of thieves’ favorite things. Post boxes not checked and cash in the mail Sending financials is an epic fail Shopping on websites and all that this brings These are a few of thieves’ favourite things. Yards with full landscapes with no open sightlines Boxes that stay on your step are a goldmine Leaving the lights off? It’s not bright like Spring. These are a few of thieves’ favourite things.

When it’s sketchy Please report it We really will be glad Just simply remember our favourite things And mail theft won’t be so bad

I would like to take the opportunity to thank the dedicated Board of Directors of the CFPA for your support,

ideas, passion and talent to continuing to move CFPA forward. Shout out to Board Members Brad Jones,

Gayle Watson, Bob Bleaney, Amanda and Will Glover and a special thanks to Jim Willson who continues

to keep us informed and updated with the monthly Newsletters. I would also like to acknowledge our

Partners, for without their support and continued communication, CFPA would not be as strong as we

are; Sgt. Ryan Singleton, Cst. Nathan Moore and Cst.Clayton Gelinas, Cochrane RCMP, Officer Mark

Hoskin, Alberta Fish and Wildlife, Officer Jay Loro, Rocky View Enforcement Branch and to all the Partner

representation at our Meetings.

As we all go about out preparations and festivities, it is important to remember to maintain our awareness

and be observant of things that “don’t look right” in our Communities. May you and your families enjoy

a wonderful holiday and be safe. From the CFPA Board and Volunteers;

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Rural Crime Watch – January 2020

Monthly Newsletter to Members of Cochrane Foothills Protective Association

VILLAGE RESIDENTS USE INNOVATIONS TO THWART THIEVES At 4:30 am on May 3, a truck pulled into a prairie village. It stopped in an area away from the street lights. A village resident heard a sound, looked out and saw the unknown vehicle. Three occupants emerged and started walking slowly in several directions. She immediately called a nearby neighbour and asked them to also watch and contact others. The resident then quietly went to the vehicle, peaked in and removed the keys. Meanwhile the neighbour called the police and other neighbours. In 15 minutes, most of the community turned on their

outside lights. Many started driving around in trucks, cars and quads looking for the probable prowlers. One resident had a drone with a night camera. Another had a plane. The police came and joined the search. The prowlers were not in the village. No vehicles were stolen to make a getaway. The village was located in a very flat area and the spring thaw had left fields so wet that four wheel drives could not travel.

A few hours later, three youth suspects were located in a very marshy area. A local farmer transported the officers in the bucket of the tractor to the suspects. And back to the village with suspects also in the bucket. It appeared they were relieved to be found and rescued from very soggy and cold terrain. They were arrested and charged with offences of theft, possession of stolen property and breach of probation.

This story started earlier. The suspects were from a nearby urban area where they would party, steal a vehicle, drive to a rural area where keys were often in trucks, and choose a truck with a quad cab for comfort. Then they would drive to a village to prowl and pilfer items of value to sell. They would return home with the booty and ditch the truck. This was to be another adventure with probable opportunities.

The community had been experiencing random thefts at night. Only a few weeks earlier, the community met and decided to be proactive. The main steps were to get to know others and to feel comfortable enough to alert anyone at any time. They also set-up a contact list of names and phone numbers - organized in a phone fan-out with primary and secondary contacts. The explicit understanding was to pay attention to the fan-out and diligently alert others.

The RCMP was aware that small communities are sometimes the target of thefts. Typically a group comes at night with one or two vehicles, prowlers walk along streets and lanes checking for unlocked doors. Items stolen are often vehicles, items in vehicles and from unlocked buildings. Communities are encouraged to watch for suspicious activity, and report promptly to police and neighbours. In this case the removal of the keys was a


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

significant break in the chain of the suspects’ actions. Police cautioned that any such interrupting action maintain safety first. At night and even in daylight, the risks from intruders are very hard to gauge. Of key concern is the variety of weapons and personalities. Police were delighted the alert went to most of the community, and the turning on of lights and searching disrupted the culprits. A bonus was the availability of surveillance modes such as the plane and drone - to add to the eyes and ears of everyone engaged. Police also noted that as the search continued, no resident approached the suspects; police were frequently updated of any sightings of the suspects.

From a rural crime prevention perspective, the residents were aware and concerned, considered resources they had, formed a simple plan and carried it out. Actions were common sense and minimized risk. This story is a composite of several incidents from which to encourage custom community surveillance.

RURAL EMERGENCY ALERTS Each rural community develops its own means of alerting neighbours of a threat such as fire, flood or intruders.

More than a century ago, the continuous ringing of church bell or the continuous whistle of a steam engine would signal “Pay attention. Help needed. Come to muster point”. Into the last half of 20th century, party line phones provided a means to alert all on the same line by an unusual or long ring. Today most people carry a smart phone with features to provide broad distribution of an alert message. The key is a system known to all. Consider using more of the phone features in a

proactive community support group to quickly alert others. Have all names in the phone contact list and then assemble contact groups to easily send texts and photos. Share phone techniques so all in your group are competent to participate. Make alert messages brief, accurate and prompt. When using the camera, experiment with magnification, flash, focus, etc. Use two quick clicks on the home button to turn on the camera at any time. Use the compass or maps to identify locations not familiar to you. Minimize personal information of others on your phone. Use the lock feature to minimize access to others if you lose the phone. Adopt alert protocols that are most accessible and effective for your group. The vigilance and alerts of everyone helps deter crime for you and the whole community. RCW PARTICIPATION Check out the news and links on our website https://cfparcw.ca/. Invite your neighbours to also become part of our community crime prevention movement to send a message to would-be intruders. “Beware. These rural people are informed, prepared and connected to deter crime.” INVITATION TO MEMBERS If you have any information, comments or questions to share in the next newsletter, please submit to the general CFPA email address [email protected] . We are Rural Crime Watch, a network of concerned residents, committed to making a safer community through basic crime prevention principles. Our security is greatly enhanced when we work together as good neighbours.

Writer – Jim Willson


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

https://cfparcw.ca/�

mailto:[email protected]�

Aiiuciaiiou «jI

Summer VILLAGESOF ALBERTA

2020 Winter Newsletter

Your Board of Directors continue to advocate on your behalf to ensure our provincial government and other

municipal associations understand and recognize that summer villages are a sustainable and recognized municipal

level of government, one that is not only well governed but great stewards of our Alberta lakes and rivers.

The change in provincial government this past spring meant that your association had to work to build new

relationships. Under President Mike Pashak's guidance the Board continues to communicate and meet with

representatives from the province to discuss summer village priorities. This includes:

Municipal Affairs:

The ASVA continues to emphasize that MSI funding for summer villages should be consistent with all other

municipalities. Over the last 6 months, your President has met with Minister Madu and Deputy Minister Paul Wynnyk

on several occasions. A big part of the discussions included helping these new leaders understand that summer

villages have the same infrastructure needs and challenges as do other municipalities. The Board has also sent a

letter to Minister Madu requesting that the ASVA be part of the new Local Government Fiscal Framework (LGFF)

funding formula dialog. Other items communicated to the department:

• our support for the new MGA changes that recently came out and other red tape reductions.

• priority levels in the Water for Life program: currently waste water projects are priority two, we believe

waste water projects for communities adjacent to lakes should be changed to priority one because of their

impact on lake health and recreation. This will also be communicated to the department responsible.

• while not under this department, we discussed the financial impact of the new police funding model

Alberta Environment and Parks:

One of the primary areas discussed with the Honorable Jason Nixon, was the need to open up public consultation on

the Provincial Disturbance Standards (boat mooring & dock placement). The new Temporary Field Authorization

(TFA) program could generate 1,000's of permit applications into the department. The summer villages and other

municipalities adjacent to lakes are closer to the issues affecting lakes and are therefore better positioned to over see

the activities on their shorelines.

Ice hut removal is another major issue communicated with the Minister. The department has recognized the

tremendous hazards that can affect our lakes if ice huts are not removed prior to the spring thaw. With no

registration process in place, there is no way of knowing who is responsible for their removal or potential clean up

costs. We also want to recognize the work of the Sylvan Lake Management Committee on this issue. We understand

that the department is considering the inclusion of ice hut ownership identification in this year's Alberta Guide to

Sportfishing Regulations. Please watch for confirmation to this new approach.

Other Advocacy Efforts:

One of the requests that came from this year's AGM was asking the ASVA to investigate who is responsible for

monitoring and regulating what types of bird and mixed flower seeds are sold in Alberta. Many of these packets;

contain noxious weed seeds and this is a contributing factor to the weed problems we see at many of our lakes. We

will continue to keep you updated on the status.

As you know, Mike Pashak is the Summer Village representative on the AUMA Board. Mike is happy to advise that he

has been appointed to the AUMA Small Communities Committee. Mike is committed to ensure the interests of

summer villages are brought to the table and will strongly advocate on your behalf. Summer Village of Ghost Lake Regular Council Meeting

Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Part of our continued advocacy efforts is to also dialog with our rural neighbors. Vice President, Duncan Binder

attended last year's RMA annual conference. This setting provided a great opportunity for him to share concerns and

interests and to raise the profile of the ASVA.

In 2019, your board continued to work on a number of provincial committees.

• Director Morris Nesdole sits on the AEP Fisheries Stakeholder Committee on behalf of ASVA. In 2019, this

committee finalized their third-party review of the North Central Native Trout Recovery Program. This report

was circulated to all members and is posted on the ASVA website.

• Directors Marlene Walsh and Brenda Shewaga continue to sit on the Aquatic Invasive Species Committee. To

date there has been 10,819 inspections done on boats entering Alberta and this resulted in finding 19 mussel

fouled boats.

• Director Dennis Evans sits on the Municipal Sustainability Strategy Advisory Committee. He provides input

from a summer village perspective on viability reviews and municipal sustainability.

• Director Pete Langelle represented the ASVA on the Septage Variance Transition Work Group. This

committee work has concluded.

• Past President Peter Pellatt has been reappointed to the Forest Resources Improvement Association of

Alberta. For more information on this committee's projects, visit: https://friaa.ab.ca/who-is-friaa/

Your Board spent time reviewing the 2019 provincial government budget and how it impacts municipalities. MSI

infrastructure grant funding was a topic of great discussion. The Board will do so again this spring when the 2020

budget is presented. The Board also undertook a detailed review of AUMA's Red Tape Reduction report. This is a

welcome approach and the ASVA has submitted a recommendation to the province that they implement a general

authorization program that continues to include municipal approval for boat mooring and dock placement rather

than going through the government's TFA program.

The Conference Committee worked hard to deliver an informative conference this past year. We hope those who

participated felt it was a great opportunity to learn and network. The Committee would like to thank all those who

donated to the silent auction this year. The silent auction raised $4,643; $1,000 more than last year. This event and

your contributions go a very long way to keeping the conference registration fee affordable.

The ASVA Board has passed their 2020 budget; it included an increase of $2,044 over last year. The cost to advocate

and represent the interests of summer villages continues to increase. The annual membership fees were increased

slightly to help cover this increase. In 2020, the membership fee is $.0262 x equalized assessment / 1000 (the flat

rate fee from previous year's was eliminated). The maximum membership fee is $975.

Recently a number of ASVA Board members as well as other members participated in the AUMA President's Summit.

This summit included AUMA members from around the province to discuss the impact of the recent Alberta

government budget. Attendees got to hear first hand how the 2019 budget was impacting communities and what

others are doing to manage with reduced government support. A special thank you to Mayor Don Davidson from the

SV of Grandview for representing summer villages on one of the panels.

We continue to update the website and.regularly circulate information to our members on a variety of topics or as

things are updated or changed. We offer fan-out support by sending out questions and queries to your fellow CAO's.

Job postings are sent out to members as well as posted on our website.

The ASVA is very proud to state to the provincial decision-makers and all other stakeholders that our membership is

supported by 100% of the summer villages. If you have any questions, suggestions or comments, please never

hesitate to call or email our Executive Director, Deb Hamilton at 780-236-5456 or execdirector(S)asva.ca or

[email protected] Village of Ghost Lake


NEW

BUSINESS


Feb 18, 2020 of 89


Re: ORRSC ACP Grant

BACKGROUND

The Oldman River Region GIS partnership is seeking grant funding to enhance their GIS infrastructure to meet the needs of evolving requirements for its 45 member municipalities. The partnership’s current

version of GIS software is approaching the end of its lifecycle, and in that time not only has the landscape

of GIS sophistication changed, but the amount of different types of GIS users within a municipality has

increased exponentially. GIS information is now a key component that ties in multiple facets within a

municipality from planning, finance, public works, and policing while at the same time, provides front line

access to municipal rate payers. The partnership aims to utilize a software package provided by ESRI, the

worldwide leader in geospatial software, to build a new, highly functional and expandable GIS solution

that will provide all users with the necessary tools to make informed decisions.

The membership will rely on a long‐standing and successful relationship with the Oldman River Regional

Services Commission (ORRSC) who has acted as their GIS contractor for the past 17 years to offer

guidance throughout the enhancement process. Along with ORRSC’s guidance, the members will play the

most important role in the enhancement project as they, in the end, are the users of the GIS system and

will be providing constant input to help mold and shape the final project. The consultation will include

frequent “inside looks” at the performance and layout of each member site individually as it is being built.

The enhancement project will first produce a new GIS viewer for all users using Geocortex software.

Geocortex is a Canadian GIS solution offered as part of a suite from ESRI Canada and is an award winning

GIS viewer that is used across many municipalities in Canada and the United States. The Geocortex

software is scalable and can be continually expanded with additional tools, reporting functions, and

workflows to meet the needs of large municipalities while on the other hand, can be easily simplified for

use in a small municipality. The use of Geocortex allows for never before seen customization using

workflows to create custom operations within the GIS itself.

Secondly, the project will allow the use of feature rich web mapping applications which have become very

prevalent in the world of GIS in the past five years. Member municipalities will be able to have ad‐ hoc

web mapping applications created in very little time that are able to serve a very specific purpose. These

applications can be department specific and can be created for use over various periods of time from an

app showing a parade route that will only be used for a few weeks, to a permanent application that takes

users on a walking tour of the municipality which highlights historic buildings. The latter map, known as a

“tour” map was voted as one of the top new features of the ESRI web map applications and is now being

used by municipalities to aid tourism and economic development.

This enhancement project with the assistance of renowned software solutions provided by ESRI will

greatly increase each of the 45 members’ efficiency, accountability and service delivery to their rate

payers.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Approve the signing of the Council resolution attached to participate in the grant project


February 18, 2020


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

Alberta Community Partnership – IC Council Resolution 1) Be it resolved that we authorize the ___________________________________________ (Name of Municipality)

to participate in an application for the 2020 Oldman River Region GIS Enhancement Project

submitted by the Town of Coaldale under the Intermunicipal Collaboration component Alberta Community Partnership Grant, further

2) That the _____________________________________________ , a participant, agrees to (Name of Municipality)

abide by the terms of the Conditional Grant Agreement, governing the purpose and use of the grant funds. ________________________________ Chief Elected Official or Duly Authorized Signing Officer

________________________________ Date


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

shers

Typewritten Text

Summer Village of Ghost Lake

shers

Typewritten Text


COMMUNITY &G

December 20, 2019

Joint Regional ARB Member Municipalities

Dear Sirs/Madams:

Re: Amending Agreement to April 1, 2010 ARB Joint Regional Agreement

Due to the increasing cost of administering the Joint Regional Agreement, the City of Airdrie isrequesting a change to the fee for Board Member requests effective March 1, 2020. This cost has notbeen adjusted since the inception of the Agreement in 2010. Accordingly, attached hereto is anAmending Agreement that reflects the following change:

Current Fee New Fee

Board Member Request (per memberrequired)

$25.00 $50.00

The words "whether fulfilled or not" have been added to Section 3(e) of the Agreement in recognitionthat Airdrie City staff may have to expend effort to find a member without success. Fortunately, this hasnot occurred to date.

Please review the attached Amending Agreement and provide two (2) originally signed copies to myattention.

Should any Member Municipality wish to withdraw from participation in the Joint Regional Agreement, itmay do so by serving thirty (30) days' written notice to the City of Airdrie.

Please do not hesitate to contact me, Kari Kitiuk or Tammy Belsham at 403-948-8816 should you haveany questions or concerns.

Best regards,

Sharon PollyckDirector, CAO's Office

/tib

Genesis Place

800 East Lake Blvd NE

Airdrie, AB T4A 2K9

F: 403.948.0604

City Haii

400 Main Street SE

Airdrie, AB T4B 3C3

F: 403.948.6567

Tel: 403.948.8800

1.888.AIRDRIE

airdrie.ca

Parks/Public Works

23 East Lake Hiii NE

Airdrie, AB T4A2K3

F: 403.948.8403

Municipal Enforcement

2 Fiighland Park Way NE

Airdrie, AB T4A0R1

F: 403.948.0619 oSummer Village of Ghost Lake


AMENDING AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is effective as of the day of February, 2020

BETWEEN:

CITY OF AIRDRIE

400 Main Street S.E.

Airdrie, AB T4B 303

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

AND:

SUMMER VILLAGE OF GHOST LAKEBox 5754

High River, AB T1V 1P3

SUMMER VILLAGE OF WAIPAROUSBox 5754

High River, AB T1V 1P3

TOWN OF BLACK DIAMONDBox 10

Black Diamond, AB TOLOHO

CITY OF CHESTERMERE105 Marina Road

Chestermere, AB T1X1V7

TOWN OF COCHRANE

101 Ranchehouse RoadCochrane, AB T4C2K8

TOWN OF CROSSFIELDPC Box 500

1412 Railway StreetCrossfield, AB TOM OSO

TOWN OF HIGH RIVER309B Macleod Trail SWHigh River, AB T1V1Z5

TOWN OF OKOTOKS

PC Box 20, Station Main56 Elizabeth Street

Okotoks,AB T1S1K1

TOWN OF TURNER VALLEY223 Main Street NE

Box 330

Turner Valley, AB TOL 2A0

(hereinafter referred to as the "Member Municipalities")


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

WHEREAS the City of Airdrie, the Town of Cochrane, the Town of Crossfieid and the Town ofOkotoks (collectively, the "Original Parties") entered into a Joint Regional Agreement effective April 1,2010 (the "Original Agreement") and an amending agreement (the "First Amending Agreement")effective July 13, 2010 with respect to the sharing of Assessment Review Board members (collectively, the"Joint Regional Agreement");

AND WHEREAS pursuant to the terms of the Joint Regional Agreement, the remaining MemberMunicipalities became parties to the Joint Regional Agreement;

AND WHEREAS, the City of Airdrie is named as Coordinator of the Joint Regional Agreement;

AND WHEREAS, the City of Airdrie wishes to amend the fee payable by each Member Municipalitywhen requesting the services of the Coordinator for each Board Member request;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WiTNESSETH that in consideration of the covenants andother good and valuable consideration herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged, the Member Municipalities hereto agree to amend the Joint Regional Agreement as set outherein.

A. AMENDMENTS

1. That Section 3(a) of the Joint Regional Agreement be amended by replacing the email address of theCoordinator, "[email protected]" with "[email protected]".

2. That Section 3(e) of the Joint Regional Agreement be deleted and replaced by the following:

"The Member Municipality requesting the services of the Coordinator shall pay the Coordinator Fifty($50.00) Dollars for each Board Member request, whether fuifiiied or not, upon receipt of an invoice for saidservices."

B GENERAL

3. AMENDMENTS

The Parties agree that the Joint Regional Agreement is hereby amended to the extent required to giveeffect to Section A of this Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, ail other terms andconditions of the Joint Regional Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

4. MISCELLANEOUS

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the JointRegional Agreement. Headings are inserted for the convenience of the Parties only and are not to beconsidered when interpreting this Agreement. Words in the singular mean and include the plural and viceversa. Words in the masculine include the feminine and vice versa. No regard for gender is intended by thelanguage in this Agreement.

5. GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement and the rights of the Parties hereunder shall be construed, governed and enforced inaccordance with the laws of the Province of Alberta. The Parties hereby irrevocably attorn to the jurisdictionof the Courts of the Province of Alberta in respect of any disputes arising herefrom.

6. ENUREMENT

This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties hereto and their respectiveheirs, executors, administrators, successors and permitted assigns, as applicable.


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

7. COUNTERPARTS

This Agreement may be signed and delivered in counterparts, each of which will be considered to be anoriginal, and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date

first above written.

City of Airdrie

Per:

Town of Cochrane

Per:

Per: Per:


Per:

Town of Crossfield

Per:

Per: Per:

Summer Village of Waiparous

Per:

Town of High River

Per:

Per: Per:

Town of Black Diamond

Per:

Town of Okotoks

Per:

Per: Per:

City of Chestermere

Per:

Town of Turner Valley

Per:

Per: Per:


Feb 18, 2020 of 89

ghostlake.caghostlake.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AGENDA-PACKAGE.pdf · Summer Village of Ghost...

Documents

Transcript of ghostlake.caghostlake.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AGENDA-PACKAGE.pdf · Summer Village of Ghost...