Suit No.1241/08 - judis.nic.injudis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=ro... · Sh....

Suit No.1241/08

21.12.2015.

Present : Sh. Mukesh Narayan Advocate for petitioner.

Sh. S.C. Aggarwal Advocate for respondent no. 2.

Sh. Krishan Kumar Advocate for respondent no. 3.

Sh. S.C. Sharma Advocate for respondent no. 4/National

Insurance Company.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of L Rs of respondent no. 2. Case

was fixed for final arguments. Adjournment is requested by ld. Counsels for

parties. Allowed.

To come on 18.01.2016 for final arguments.

PO,MACT1(N)ROHINI, DELHI / 21.12.2015.

Suit No.1149/08

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person with Sh. R.K. Paliwal Advocate.

Mr. V.K. Puri Advocate for respondent no. 3/ Insurance

company.

Case was fixed for final arguments today. Due to overwork,

arguments could not be heard.

To come on 23.01.2016 for final arguments.


Suit No.863/09

21.12.2015.

Present : Mr.Dilip Kumar Mishra Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.K. Tyagi Advocate for R3/ ICICI Lombard General

Insurance Company Ltd.

ASI Pawan Singh is present and examined as PW2 and

discharged. No other witness is present or served for today. Ld. Counsel for

petitioner requested for one more opportunity to call eye witness. Allowed.

To come on 25.02.2016 for P.E.


Suit No.805/09

21.12.2015.

Present : Mr. Irshad Khan Advocate ( proxy counsel) for petitioner.

TI Om Prakash for respondent no. 2/ DTC.

Today was fixed for P.E. NO PW is present or served for today.

Adjournment is requested by ld. Counsel for petitioner stating that petitioner

could not come today being unwell. Allowed.

To come on 19.04.2016.


Suit No.304/15

21.12.2015.

Present : None for injured.

Sh.Sumant Sudan Advocate for R1/ driver.

Notice upon injured was ordered to be issued for today. No

report about service. Let same be again issued for next date through SHO,

PS Bawana.

To come on 25.04.2016.


Suit No.10/13

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person.

None for respondents.

Case was not settled in Lok Adalat. Otherwise, it was fixed for

P.E. Petitioner requests for adjournment stating that he is unable to file

affidavit as his counsel could not come today. Allowed.

Petitioner is asked to file his affidavit and affidavits of his

witnesses ( if any) in evidence before next date, with advance copy to

respondents.

To come for crossexamination of PWs on 26.04.2016.


Suit No.283/14

21.12.2015.

File taken up today on application filed by petitioner Gopal Dubey.

Present : Applicant in person with Sh. K.K. Kaushik Advocate.

As per Nazir a cheque in the name of the applicant/petitioner in

the sum of Rs. 1,15,000/ has been received from TATA AIG General

Insurance Co. Ltd. Let said cheque be handed over to the applicant/

petitioner.

With this, claim is satisfied.

File be sent back to record room.


Suit No.928/09

21.12.2015.

File taken up today on application filed by petitioner Sanjay Garg

Present : Applicant in person with counsel.

As per Nazir, two cheques in the name of the

applicant/petitioner in the sum of Rs.1,72,081/ & Rs. 80178/ have been

received from Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Let said cheques be handed over

to the applicant/ petitioner.




Suit No.222/13

21.12.2015.

File taken up today on application filed by petitioner Ram Khilawan

Present : Applicant in person with Sh. K.K. Kaushik Advocate.

As per Nazir a cheque in the name of the applicant/petitioner in

the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/ has been received from Bajaj Allianz General

Insurance Co. Ltd. Let said cheque be handed over to the applicant/

petitioner.




FIR No.1336/15PS Mukherjee Nagar

21.12.2015.

Fresh DAR filed by IO SI Manoj .

It be checked & registered.

Present : IO in person.

Ms.Babita Tyagi Advocate for Injured Kishan Pal Singh.

Driver Hemant Kumar in person.

Owner Tikeshwar Kumar in person.

Mr. Anupam Kumar Singh Advocate for R3/ TATA AIG

General Insurance Company Ltd.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of ld. counsel for petitioner. Memo

of appearance filed on behalf of counsel for insurance company. Ld. Counsel

undertakes to file proper power of attorney/vakalatnama till next date.

Copy of DAR supplied. Respondents seeks adjournment to file

reply/written statement. Be filed before next date.

To come on 22.01.2016.


FIR No.355/15PS S.B. Dairy

21.12.2015.

Fresh DAR filed by IO ASI Om Prakash



Injured Pankaj in person

None for driver.

Sh. D.R. Jain Advocate for owner.

Mr. Anupam Kumar Singh Advocate for R3/ RelianceGeneral


Memo of appearance filed on behalf of counsel for insurance

company. Ld. Counsel undertakes to file proper power of

attorney/vakalatnama till next date.

Copy of DAR supplied. Respondents seeks adjournment to file

reply/written statement. Be filed before next date.

Court notice be issued to driver through IO for next date.

To come on 30.01.2016.


FIR No.430/13PS Bawana

21.12.2015.

Fresh DAR filed by IO ASI Narender Singh.



As per IO, he served notice upon LRs of deceased but they are

not appear today. Let notice to LRs be issued again for next date.

To come on 28.01.2016.


Suit No.392/15

21.12.2015.

Present : Sh. Javed Akhtar Advocate ( proxy counsel) for petitioner.

Sh.S.k.Sharma Advocate for respondent no. 1.

Sh. Neeraj Dinkar Advocate ( proxy counsel) for respondent no.

3/ Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd.

Written statement filed, one on behalf of respondent no. 1 and

other on behalf of respondent no. 3. Copies supplied.

Offer made by respondent no. 3 is not acceptable to petitioner.

After going through pleadings of parties, following issues are framed:

1. Whether petitioner suffered injuries in a vehicular accident occurred

on 14.10.2015 at 9.30 p.m. , G.T. Road, Tripolia Gate, Delhi due to

rash and negligent driving of vehicle no.DL2CW9413 by Joginder

Singh (respondent no. 1)? OPP.

2. Whether petitioner is entitled to get compensation as prayed for. If

yes, what amount and from whom of respondents?OPP.

3. Relief.

All parties are asked to file list of their witnesses within one

week. Petitioner is asked to file his affidavit and affidavits of his

witnesses ( if any) in evidence before next date, with advance copy to

respondents.

To come for crossexamination of PWs on 22.04.2016.


Suit No.169/12

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person with Sh. Ashok Kumar Advocate.

Ms.Priyanka Advocate for respondent no. 2.

Mr. S.C. Sharma Advocate for respondent no. 3/insurance company.

Petitioner is examined as PW1 & Sh. Satish Kumar is present

and examined as PW2, discharged. P.E. is closed as requested by ld. Counsel

for petitioner. Adjournment is requested by ld. Counsel for respondents to

lead evidence. Allowed.

To come on 14.03.2016 for R.E.


Suit No.347/15

21.12.2015.

File taken up today on application filed by applicants/petitioners.

Present : All Applicants in person with counsel.

As per Nazir three cheques in the name of the

applicants/petitioners i.e. Sh. Roshan Lal and Smt.Mina amounting to Rs.

17,000/ each, Ms. Mamta amounting to Rs. 16,000/ have been received

from respondent no. 1 ( Vinod) which is stated to be amount of interim

compensation. Let said cheques be handed over to the applicants/ petitioners.

To come on 22.03.2016 for P.E., the date already fixed.


Ex. No.05/15

21.12.2015.

Present : Ms. Poonam & Romal in person with Sh. Amrish Yadav.

Sh. Purshotam Kumar Advocate for JD No. 2.

Sh. Sunil Dutt Advocate for JD No. 1.

Two cheques in the name of Ms. Poonam for an amount of Rs.

1,94,000/each and two cheques in the name of Romal for an amount of Rs.

3,39,500/ each, two cheques in the name of Mansa Ram for a sum of Rs.

48,500/each and two cheques in the name of Chandro Devi in sum of Rs.

63,483/ each as submitted by respondent no. 2. As per ld. Counsel, his

client i.e. respondent no. 2 is paying this amount without prejudice to his

rights, an SLP filed by him, is still pending before Supreme Court of India.

Cheques of Poonam & Romal be handed over to them.

Petitioners Mansa Ram & Chandro Devi are stated to have

expired. An application has been filed by these petitioners i.e. Smt. Poonam

& Romal with request to implead them as LRs and hand over said cheques.

Let report of SHO PS Bawana be called about death of Mansa

Ram & Chandro Devi and also their LRs. Report be filed till next date.

To come on 19.01.2015.


Suit No.40/13

21.12.2015.

File taken up today on two application filed on behalf of

petitioner.

Present : Sh. Ramanand Advocate for petitioners.

Heard on two applications filed by petitioners.

A cheque for a sum of Rs.11,302/ was received in the name

of Nand Kishore Mishra. One is an application with a request to withdraw

amount of said cheque by Smt. Reeta .

It is submitted by ld. Counsel for petitioners that Sh. Nand

Kishore Mishra is seriously ill and hence, he could not appear today. He has

authorised Smt. Reeta to collect cheque on his behalf. Authority letter is put

on file.

Considering all this, request is allowed. Cheque is stated to have

deposited with SBI Rohini. Directions be given to Manager of said bank to

encash said cheque and hand over amount of it to applicant Smt. Reeta.

Heard on another application . Petitioner Kajal is stated to have

expired. SHO concerned be directed to file report about death of said Mrs.

Kajal and to tell about her LRs.

Report be filed, till next date.

To come on 14.04.2016, the date already fixed.


Suit No.30/09

21.12.2015.

Present : Proxy for petitioner.

Sh. Shashwat Kumar Advocate R3/insurance company.

Sh. Akash Manager of Singhal Hospital is present who did not

bring the summoned record. He is directed to bring the same on next date and

is bound down for that date.



IN THE COURT OF SH. RAJENDER KUMAR SHASTRI:

P.O.,MACT,ROHINI:DELHI

Suit NO. 96/13

IN RE: Narender Kaushik Vs. Vinod Kumar & Ors.To,

Medical Superintendent,

Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital,

Delhi.

DIRECTIONS FOR MEDICAL EXAMINATION

Whereas the above mentioned claim petition seeking payment of compensation has been preferred in the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in connection with an accident involving use of Motor Vehicle. Photograph of the Claimant with his specimen signatures/thumb impression are affixed above. The claimant Sh. Narender Kaushik S/o Sh. Prem Singh Kaushik R/o H.No. C79, Laxmi Park, Nangloi, Delhi41 is stated to have suffered injuries as a result of the said accident, as per MLC NO. B5479/12, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar, Hospital.

And whereas for the purpose of inquiry into the claim petition, this Tribunal considers it necessary to ascertain the degree and extent of disability ( if any) suffered as a result of the said accident by the said claimant;

Now, in exercise of powers vesting in this Claims Tribunal, in terms of Rule 17 of Delhi Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 2008, the undersigned directs you to get the said claimant examined by a Medical Officer/Board of Medical Officers in your hospital and submit report to this Tribunal within 30 days of the receipt of this direction.

Given under the name and seal of this Tribunal, on 21st December 2015.

The order is being given dasti to the counsel for claimant for onward compliance on or before the next date i.e. 12.04.2016.

(Rajender Kumar Shastri) PO, MACT, Rohini, Delhi 21.12.2015.

Suit No.96/13

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person with Mr. M.K. Vats Advocate.

Heard on application filed by petitioner. Applicant wants a

certificate from doctor concerned about extent of his permanent disability.

It is submitted by ld. Counsel for applicant that latter has

suffered permanent disability, due to accident in question. He requires a

certificate in this regard to be adduced in evidence on file. Considering

aforestated facts, application is allowed. Applicant is referred to Medical

Supdt. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital. Medical Supdt. may examine him

alongwith his medical record ( if any) s and to give certificate, if petitioner

has suffered any permanent disability. Certificate /report be filed till next

date.

To come for P.E. on 12.04.2016, the date already fixed.


Suit No.159/11

21.12.2015.

Present : Mr. M.P.Nagar Advocate for petitioner.

Ms. Shalini Rawat Advocate for respondent no. 3/ insurance company.

Affidavit of Petitioner filed in evidence. Copy supplied.

To come for crossexamination on 18.04.2016.


Suit No.66/12

21.12.2015.

Present : Sh. Shashi Ranjan Kumar Advocate for respondent no.3/

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Case is fixed for R.E. on 07.01.2016.

Heard on application filed by ld. counsel for respondent no. 3.

Latter wants to examine one witness i.e. concerned official of Regional

Transport Authority Saharanpur, UP with complete record well mentioned in

the application. Ld. Counsel undertakes to send notice upon said witness on

his own responsibility.

Considering all this, request is allowed. Said witness be summoned for

next date. Process be given dasti to the applicant for next date.

To come on 07.01.2016 for R.E.


Suit No.12/14

21.12.2015.

Present : Mr. U.C. Rai Advocate for petitioner.

Heard on application filed by petitioner. Latter wants to examine

Dr. Manoj Garg, Maharaja Agrasen Hospital,Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, well

mentioned in the application.


next date.





Suit NO. 27/15

IN RE: Nirbhay Kumar Vs. Aman Kumar & Ors.

To,


Bara Hindu Rao Hospital,

Delhi.


Whereas the above mentioned claim petition seeking payment of compensation has been preferred in the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in connection with an accident involving use of Motor Vehicle. Photograph of the Claimant with his specimen signatures/thumb impression are affixed above. The claimant Sh. Nirbhay Kumar S/o Sh. Om Prakash R/o 1095, Gali No. 9, Nathu Colony, Nathu Pura, Burari, Delhi is stated to have suffered injuries as a result of the said accident, as per MLC NO. 81056, Babu Jagjiwan Ram Hospital.

And whereas for the purpose of inquiry into the claim petition, this Tribunal considers it necessary to ascertain the degree and extent of disability ( if any) suffered as a result of the said accident by the said claimant;

Now, in exercise of powers vesting in this Claims Tribunal, in terms of Rule 17 of Delhi Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 2008, the undersigned directs you to get the said claimant examined by a Medical Officer/Board of Medical Officers in your hospital and submit report to this Tribunal within 30 days of the receipt of this direction.




Suit No.27/15

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person with Mr. P.K. Mishra Advocate.

Mr. S.K. Tyagi Advocate for respondent no. 1.

No PW is present or served for today. An application filed on

behalf of applicant/petitioner.







Supdt. Hindu Rao Hospital. Medical Supdt. may examine him alongwith his

medical record ( if any) s and to give certificate, if petitioner has suffered

any permanent disability. Certificate /report be filed till next date.





Suit NO. 382/13

IN RE: Deepak Vs. Mani PalTo,


IBHASS Hospital,

Shahdara,Delhi.


Whereas the above mentioned claim petition seeking payment of compensation has been preferred in the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in connection with an accident involving use of Motor Vehicle, and the claimant is Photograph of the Claimant with his specimen signatures/thumb impression is affixed above. The claimant Deepak s/o Sh. Umed Singh R/o H.NO. 1086A, Harijan Pana, Mojhan Pana, Madan, Bawana, Delhi39 is stated to have suffered injuries as a result of the said accident, as per MLC NO. 1554/12, Satyawadi Raja Harishchander Hospital, Narela.

And whereas for the purpose of inquiry into the claim petition, this Tribunal considers it necessary to ascertain the degree and extent of disability, if any, suffered as a result of the said accident by the said claimant;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers vesting in this Claims Tribunal, in terms of Rule 17 of Delhi Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 2008, the undersigned directs you to get the said claimant examined by a Medical Officer/Board of Medical Officers in your hospital and submit report on above aspects to this Tribunal within 30 days of the receipt of this direction.




Suit No.382/13

21.12.2015.

Present : Petitioner in person with Mr. K.K. Kaushik Advocate.







Supdt. IBHASS Hospital, Shahdara. Medical Supdt. may examine him



date.



Suit No358/12

21.12.2015.

Present: Mr. U.C. Rai Advocate for petitioner.


Record clerk, of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajender Nagar, New Delhi

alongwith original treatment record of petitioner, well mentioned in the

application.


next date.

Heard on another application filed by petitioner. Applicant wants

a certificate from doctor concerned about extent of his permanent disability.





Supdt. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital. Medical Supdt. may examine him



date.





Suit NO. 358/12

IN RE: Vijay Vs. Sumer Singh & Ors.To,


Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital,

Delhi.


Whereas the above mentioned claim petition seeking payment of compensation has been preferred in the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in connection with an accident involving use of Motor Vehicle, and the claimant is Photograph of the Claimant with his specimen signatures/thumb impression is affixed above. The claimant Vijay s/o Sh. Rajbir Singh R/o H.NO. 786, Village Ladpur,Delhi Delhi81 is stated to have suffered injuries as a result of the said accident, as per MLC NO. E2497 dt.29.05.2012 at J.N.S.M.Govt. Hospital, Roorkee ( Haridwar)

And whereas for the purpose of inquiry into the claim petition, this Tribunal considers it necessary to ascertain the degree and extent of disability, if any, suffered as a result of the said accident by the said claimant;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers vesting in this Claims Tribunal, in terms of Rule 17 of Delhi Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 2008, the undersigned directs you to get the said claimant examined by a Medical Officer/Board of Medical Officers in your hospital and submit report on above aspects to this Tribunal within 30 days of the receipt of this direction.




Suit No.291/13

21.12.2015.

Present: Mr. R.K. Verma Advocate for petitioner.


Rameshwar S/o Amar Singh, SHO/IO PS Kotwali Nagar, Muzzfar Nagar,

UP, Clerk SBD Hosp[ital, Saharanpur, UP, Rajesh S/o Rattan Singh, Sonu

S/o Som Dutt, Rajinder S/o Kewal Singh & Village Panchayat Officer,

Village Rohana Kalan, Muzzafar Nagar UP, well mentioned in the

application.

Considering all this, request is allowed. Said witnesses be summoned

for next date.



Suit No.546/10

21.12.2015.

Present: Mr. R.K.Jain Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. V.K. Puri Advocate for R3/ insurance company.

Witness Dr. V.K. Saini from Maharaja Agrasen Hospital not

present despite service. Let summons be again issued upon him for next

date.



Suit no.352/13

21.12.2015:

Present: Mr. K.R. Sharma Ld. counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Anupam Kumar Ld. counsel for the respondent no.3.

ASI Radhesh Kumar PS Model Town in person.

It is pointed out by IO as well as Ld. counsel for the petitioner

that the matter of other injured namely Makhan, Bunty and Ashok have

already been settled in Lok Adalat held on 23.11.2013. This fact is verified

by Ahlmad also.

Considering all this, there is no need to issue notice to other

injured named above.

Heard on an application filed by the petitioner. It is submitted

by the Ld. counsel for the applicant/petitioner that despite direction of

this tribunal dated 09.11.2015, the petitioner was not examined by doctor/

medical board of Baba Saheb Ambedker Hospital. Let explanation of

Medical Superintendent Baba Saheb Ambedker hospital be called in this

regard for next date. At the same time, Medical Superintendent is directed

to get petitioner medically examined by any medical board and to file

report about permanent disability ( if any) suffered by petitioner, till next

date.

To come on 08.02.2016.


SUIT NO. 414/09

21.12.2015

Present: Ms. Bhawana Proxy counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Dinker Ld. counsel for the respondent no.1 and 2.

Written submissions filed on behalf of the respondent no.1

and 2.

Adjournment is requested by Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner

she states that main counsel could not appear today due to some

exigency. Allowed.

To come on 25.01.2016.

PO: MACT1 (North) Rohini,Delhi/21.12.2015

Ex. NO. 43/15

21.12.2015

Present: None for parties.

As per report of Ahlmad/Nazir the amount of award has

already been received.

Issue court notice to DH/petitioner to verify the said fact.

Put up for 03.02.2016.


Ex. NO. 20/15

21.12.2015


Petitioner had undertaken to file receipt of fix deposit till

today. Not filed.

Court notice be issued to him for next date.

To come on 12.01.2016.


Ex NO. 16/15

21.12.2015


Issue court notice to petitioner for 02.02.2016.

PO: MACT1 (North)

Rohini,Delhi/21.12.2015

SUIT NO. 418/13

21.12.2015

Present: Sh. K.K. Kaushik, Advocate for petitioner.

Ms. Anita Verma, Advocate for respondent no.1 and 2.

Sh. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent no.3.

Affidavit of one Sh. Jai Pal filed. Copy supplied.

To come for cross examination on 04.04.2016.


SUIT NO. 1168/09

21.12.2015

Present: Sh. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for petitioner.

Sh. V.K. Puri, Advocate for resp no.3 i.e. Reliance General


Dr. G.C. Verma from BSA Hospital is present.

Petitioner filed some documents. At the same time

adjournment is requested for PE stating that he wants to examine IO of

the case.

To come on 27.01.2016.


Suit No.1241/08 - judis.nic.injudis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=ro... · Sh....

Documents

Transcript of Suit No.1241/08 - judis.nic.injudis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=ro... · Sh....