Studying the Policy Process l1
-
Upload
drago-floriteanu -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Studying the Policy Process l1
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
1/18
GRA 5916
The State and the Market: Core Concepts inPolitical Economy
Introduction: Studying the policy process
Professor Nick Sitter
Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law
1. Democracy and markets
2. Market regulation and thepolicy process
3. Public Governance
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
2/18
1. Democracy and Markets: Political
Economy and Public Policy Political Economy:
Classical PE : How do political institutions affect wealth and freedom?
Marx: How do macro-economic structures (class) shape politics?
Public Choice: How do micro-economic structures shape politics?
Gumund Hernes: What do people do when they cannot get what they want?
=> Lecture 1. Democracies and markets: support or conflict?
The development of democracy, the rule of law and markets
Why are democracies wealthier than authoritarian regimes?
=> Lecture 2. Market regulation: Why Public Policy?
The rationale for regulation and public services
Public policy for professionalspolicy analysis: defining the problem => assessment of
alternatives => choice => implementation => evaluation
=> Lecture 3. Public Governance: How improve Public Policy? What is good governance? Law, equality and efficiency
Three waves of modernisation
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
3/18
What is liberal democracy?
Some historical examples The Greek city states
Norse and English assemblies
The early modern democratic constitutions: USA 1787, France 1791,Norway 1814
Democracy in plural societies: Switzerland, Austria-Hungary, the EU
Locke (1960)social contract, limited power, representation
Montesquieu (1748)the rule of law, balance of power
Rousseau (1748)process, participation, the general will
Mill (1859)Liberal dem: rule of law + representative democracy
Dahl (1956, 1961)majority rule vs minority protection; Polyarchy
Schumpeter (1950)choice between competing elites
Przeworski (2000)free elections, multiple parties, govtturnover
=> constitutionally limited government, representative democracy
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
4/18
Democracies: Variations in institutions and powerINSTITUTIONS USMODEL WESTMINSTER
MODEL
WEST EUROPEAN
MODEL
EUROPEAN UNION
MODEL
Balance of Power Separation of power,
checks and balances
Parliamentary
Sovereignty
Formal and informal
separation of power
Formal separation of
power, subsidiarityTerritorial power Federal Centralised Regional government Multi-level
governance
Constitution Written, minority
veto on amendment
Unwritten, easily
amended
Written, minority
veto on amendment
Treaties, unanimous
revisions only
Executive Power Presidential govt
concentration of
power
One-party govt
concentration of
power
Coalition and
minority govt;
power-sharing
Commission +
European Council
Legislative
Structure
Balanced
bicameralism
Asymmetric
bicameralism
Balanced
bicameralism
Council of Ministers
+ EuropeanParliament
Electoral System Mainly plurality
system
Plurality system:
single seats
Manufactured
majorities
Proportional or mixed
electoral systems
PR for EP; CM
represents the states
Dimensions of
Party Competition
Limited: socio-
economic and
cultural-ethnic
Uni-dimensional:
socio-economic
Multi-dimensional:
socio-economic,
regional, cultural
Multi-national: and
multi-dimensional; +
EU vs states?Party System Two-party Two-party + liberals
+ nats.
Multi-party Nascent multi-
national system
Democratic
principles
State-level
referendums
No (very limited
use of) referendums
Referendums
common
Member State-level
referendums
Arend Lijphart,Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-
six countries(Yale University Press, 2012)
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
5/18
Democracy, Markets and the Rule of Law
The pluralist roots of democracy and markets in Europe Common historical conditions: dispersion (decentralisation) of power
Separation of political, religious and financial power in the Middle Ages
Agrarian and bourgeoisie bases of democracy, fascism and communism
Demands for rule of law and limits to executive power
The Rule of Law Common basis for advanced markets and individual rights
Markets are created by governments, ordered by institutions and sustainedby regulations (Wilks 1996: 538)
The institutionalisation of distributional conflicts (Przeworski, 1991)
Manchur Olsons Russian question: are no-nonsense dictatorshipsthat can impose economic change the best strategy?
NO because democratic regimes have the incentives to extract less wealth. Theyprovide the long term stability required for prosperity: Tthe conditions that are neededto have the individual rights needed for economic development are exactly the samethat are needed to have a lastingdemocracy (1993:572)
S. Wilks, Regulatory Compliance and Capitalist Diversity in Europe,Journal of European Public Policy, 3:4 (1996)
A. Przeworski,Democracy and the Market (1991)
M. Olson, Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development, American Political Science Review, 87:3 (1993)
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
6/18
Polyarchy (democracy) endures in market capitalist economies Historical record
The basic feature of the capitalist market are favourable fordemocracy
Market => growth => property-owning middle class => democracy
But Democracy & Market locked in persistent conflict UK ca 1840: market could not work with democratisation
Market raises moral and political questions b/c distributional consequences
C20 left vs right politics: political or economic redistribution of resources
But what are the consequences of economic inequality? Economic inequality => uneven distribution of resources => political inequality and
concentration of wealth => power to shape markets? Self-reinforcing trend?
Does economic inequality cause political instability and/or weaken democracy?
Does redistribution from poor to rich cause or inhibit economic growth?
What kind of institutions make markets work better?
Robert Dahl On Democracy(1998)
Joseph E. Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality(2012)
Democracy and Markets: Mutual Support or Conflict?
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
7/18
2. Market Regulation and the Policy
Process
Thinking theoretically about public goods
three questions for political economists
Normative explanations of regulationwhyprov ide publ ic goods?
Positive explanations of regulationwho wants
prov is ion of publ ic goods?
Institutional explanationshow did prov is ion of
publ ic goods com e about?
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
8/18
Public and Private Goods
Is consumption rival?
Is it excludable?
Strategic goods? What is the difference between shoes and
molecules?
Excludable Non-excludable
Rival Private Common pool
Non-rival Toll Public
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
9/18
Normative Explanations of Regulation
Regulation in the Public Interest
Safety and quality control Information, standards, product
safety, responsibility and liability
Social goals and redistribution Equitable distribution of costs,
cross-subsidies
Guaranteed service provision Security of supply, obligation to
supply
Regulation to Correct Market
Failures
Negative externalities Costs to third parties
Inadequate provision ofpublic goods
free rider (collective action)problems
Natural monopolies Distortion of allocation of
resources
Abuse of dominant position Anti-competitive practices
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
10/18
Positive Explanations of Regulation
The Supplyof Regulation
Electoral politics log rolling, pork-barrel politics,
camping finance
Bureaucratic politics over-supply, budget maximisation,
bureau shaping
Agency capture identification of regulator with
industry interest
The Demandfor Regulation
Industry demand Incumbents demand protection
New entrants demand access
Interest group demand Industrial consumers
Consumer protection agencies
Political demand Party politics, interests, ideology
Voters
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
11/18
Institutional Explanations of Regulation
The Design of Regulation
Negotiated solutions, rule of the game balance of power between actors?
the role of policy entrepreneurs?
Appropriateness or historical fit compatibility with existing institutions?
or ideas (learning) and legitimacy?
Principals delegate power to agents The advantages of arms-length administration?
How credible are the agents?
How do the principals retain control ?
Lock-ins (QWERTY)and de-politicisation
is change irreversible, are rules fixed?
The Evolution of Regulation
Pre-capitalist roots - regulation infeudal Europe
Private: guilds, self-regulation
State: monopolies, licensed corporations
The rise of the regulatory (industrial)state
Regulation as part of state building in C19
Anti-trust policy in the USA, New Deal
The European welfare state, WW I + II
The challenges to the interventionist
state The crises of the welfare state Liberalisation, deregulation and re-regulation
Globalisation
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
12/18
The Messy Reality: The Policy Cycle and Process
What is policy? (Hill, The public Policy Process, p.14-17) A course of action, or non-action A series of decisions
It changes over time
It evolves from existing policy
It includes termination and succession
It includes action without decisions
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
13/18
3. Public Governance
I. Max Weber and the rational state
II. New Public Management and market basedsolutions
III. New Governance and government beyondformal institutions
Are all public goods and services equal?
What concern to prioritise?
Equity?
Quality?
Flexibility and adaptation?
How to justify public goods
provision?
Choice Cost/benefit
Individualchoice paternalism
Societymajority rule common good
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
14/18
Weber and rational governance
The Weberian model of bureaucracy
Rational, goal-oriented bureaucracy (1922) Politically neutral
Predictable and equal treatment
Written procedures
Hierarchically organised Specialised and functional division of labour
Fixed pay, recruitment and promotion procedures
Authority linked to positions
Motivation and control (Anthony Downs, 1956)
Motivation linked to life long career, independence,professionalism, civil service ethos or mixed, several types?
Control problems: size, resistance and counter-control
Max Weber
1864 - 1920
M. Weber, Rationallegal authority and bureaucracy, from Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft
http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.weltchronik.de/bio/cethegus/w/weberm.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.weltchronik.de/bio/cethegus/w/weberm.html&h=364&w=220&sz=24&hl=en&start=4&tbnid=OkcrzbQGamXM6M:&tbnh=121&tbnw=73&prev=/images?q=max+weber&gbv=2&svnum=10&hl=en -
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
15/18
Critiques of Weber
Supply problems Do bureaucrats lobby for bigger budgets? If so, do budgets
always grow?
Information asymmetry: do the principals know as much as the
agents?
Control problems: can principals control the agents?
Demand problems The logic of collective action: all interest groups demand private
goods => budgets grow
The welfare coalition => a majority for more redistribution? Concentrated benefits and dispersed costs => budget growth?
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
16/18
The turn toward markets
William Niskanen and public choice
analysis Bureaucrats self-interest
Incentives to maximise budgets
Asymmetric information
Margaret Thatcher and the new right Interest groups demand, bureaucrats supply
Information and control problems
New solutions: efficiency and markets Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness
P. Dunleavy,Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice, Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991, chapter 6
http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.poster.net/thatcher-margaret/thatcher-margaret-photo-margaret-thatcher-6230207.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.postershop.com/Thatcher-Margaret/Thatcher-Margaret-Photo-Margaret-Thatcher-6230207.html&h=500&w=400&sz=49&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=w4eGpcke6Mdn-M:&tbnh=130&tbnw=104&prev=/images?q=thatcher&start=18&gbv=2&ndsp=18&svnum=10&hl=en&sa=N -
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
17/18
A question of state capacity
How increase statecapacity?
A smaller state?
A more effective state?
International cooperation?
Efficiency
Scope
F. Fukuyama, State Building, Cornell University Press, 2004, chapter 1
-
8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1
18/18
Modernising public services
New Public Management disaggregation, competition, incentives
=> economy, efficiency, effectiveness
Governance steering beyond government institutions
problem-oriented, joined-up thinking
blurring of public and private
power dependence, coordination, bargaining
multi-level, non-hierarchical, networks flexibility, innovation
K. A. Eliassen & N. Sitter, Understanding Public Management, Sage 2008, chapter 5