Studying the Policy Process l1

download Studying the Policy Process l1

of 18

Transcript of Studying the Policy Process l1

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    1/18

    GRA 5916

    The State and the Market: Core Concepts inPolitical Economy

    Introduction: Studying the policy process

    Professor Nick Sitter

    Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law

    1. Democracy and markets

    2. Market regulation and thepolicy process

    3. Public Governance

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    2/18

    1. Democracy and Markets: Political

    Economy and Public Policy Political Economy:

    Classical PE : How do political institutions affect wealth and freedom?

    Marx: How do macro-economic structures (class) shape politics?

    Public Choice: How do micro-economic structures shape politics?

    Gumund Hernes: What do people do when they cannot get what they want?

    => Lecture 1. Democracies and markets: support or conflict?

    The development of democracy, the rule of law and markets

    Why are democracies wealthier than authoritarian regimes?

    => Lecture 2. Market regulation: Why Public Policy?

    The rationale for regulation and public services

    Public policy for professionalspolicy analysis: defining the problem => assessment of

    alternatives => choice => implementation => evaluation

    => Lecture 3. Public Governance: How improve Public Policy? What is good governance? Law, equality and efficiency

    Three waves of modernisation

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    3/18

    What is liberal democracy?

    Some historical examples The Greek city states

    Norse and English assemblies

    The early modern democratic constitutions: USA 1787, France 1791,Norway 1814

    Democracy in plural societies: Switzerland, Austria-Hungary, the EU

    Locke (1960)social contract, limited power, representation

    Montesquieu (1748)the rule of law, balance of power

    Rousseau (1748)process, participation, the general will

    Mill (1859)Liberal dem: rule of law + representative democracy

    Dahl (1956, 1961)majority rule vs minority protection; Polyarchy

    Schumpeter (1950)choice between competing elites

    Przeworski (2000)free elections, multiple parties, govtturnover

    => constitutionally limited government, representative democracy

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    4/18

    Democracies: Variations in institutions and powerINSTITUTIONS USMODEL WESTMINSTER

    MODEL

    WEST EUROPEAN

    MODEL

    EUROPEAN UNION

    MODEL

    Balance of Power Separation of power,

    checks and balances

    Parliamentary

    Sovereignty

    Formal and informal

    separation of power

    Formal separation of

    power, subsidiarityTerritorial power Federal Centralised Regional government Multi-level

    governance

    Constitution Written, minority

    veto on amendment

    Unwritten, easily

    amended

    Written, minority

    veto on amendment

    Treaties, unanimous

    revisions only

    Executive Power Presidential govt

    concentration of

    power

    One-party govt

    concentration of

    power

    Coalition and

    minority govt;

    power-sharing

    Commission +

    European Council

    Legislative

    Structure

    Balanced

    bicameralism

    Asymmetric

    bicameralism

    Balanced

    bicameralism

    Council of Ministers

    + EuropeanParliament

    Electoral System Mainly plurality

    system

    Plurality system:

    single seats

    Manufactured

    majorities

    Proportional or mixed

    electoral systems

    PR for EP; CM

    represents the states

    Dimensions of

    Party Competition

    Limited: socio-

    economic and

    cultural-ethnic

    Uni-dimensional:

    socio-economic

    Multi-dimensional:

    socio-economic,

    regional, cultural

    Multi-national: and

    multi-dimensional; +

    EU vs states?Party System Two-party Two-party + liberals

    + nats.

    Multi-party Nascent multi-

    national system

    Democratic

    principles

    State-level

    referendums

    No (very limited

    use of) referendums

    Referendums

    common

    Member State-level

    referendums

    Arend Lijphart,Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-

    six countries(Yale University Press, 2012)

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    5/18

    Democracy, Markets and the Rule of Law

    The pluralist roots of democracy and markets in Europe Common historical conditions: dispersion (decentralisation) of power

    Separation of political, religious and financial power in the Middle Ages

    Agrarian and bourgeoisie bases of democracy, fascism and communism

    Demands for rule of law and limits to executive power

    The Rule of Law Common basis for advanced markets and individual rights

    Markets are created by governments, ordered by institutions and sustainedby regulations (Wilks 1996: 538)

    The institutionalisation of distributional conflicts (Przeworski, 1991)

    Manchur Olsons Russian question: are no-nonsense dictatorshipsthat can impose economic change the best strategy?

    NO because democratic regimes have the incentives to extract less wealth. Theyprovide the long term stability required for prosperity: Tthe conditions that are neededto have the individual rights needed for economic development are exactly the samethat are needed to have a lastingdemocracy (1993:572)

    S. Wilks, Regulatory Compliance and Capitalist Diversity in Europe,Journal of European Public Policy, 3:4 (1996)

    A. Przeworski,Democracy and the Market (1991)

    M. Olson, Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development, American Political Science Review, 87:3 (1993)

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    6/18

    Polyarchy (democracy) endures in market capitalist economies Historical record

    The basic feature of the capitalist market are favourable fordemocracy

    Market => growth => property-owning middle class => democracy

    But Democracy & Market locked in persistent conflict UK ca 1840: market could not work with democratisation

    Market raises moral and political questions b/c distributional consequences

    C20 left vs right politics: political or economic redistribution of resources

    But what are the consequences of economic inequality? Economic inequality => uneven distribution of resources => political inequality and

    concentration of wealth => power to shape markets? Self-reinforcing trend?

    Does economic inequality cause political instability and/or weaken democracy?

    Does redistribution from poor to rich cause or inhibit economic growth?

    What kind of institutions make markets work better?

    Robert Dahl On Democracy(1998)

    Joseph E. Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality(2012)

    Democracy and Markets: Mutual Support or Conflict?

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    7/18

    2. Market Regulation and the Policy

    Process

    Thinking theoretically about public goods

    three questions for political economists

    Normative explanations of regulationwhyprov ide publ ic goods?

    Positive explanations of regulationwho wants

    prov is ion of publ ic goods?

    Institutional explanationshow did prov is ion of

    publ ic goods com e about?

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    8/18

    Public and Private Goods

    Is consumption rival?

    Is it excludable?

    Strategic goods? What is the difference between shoes and

    molecules?

    Excludable Non-excludable

    Rival Private Common pool

    Non-rival Toll Public

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    9/18

    Normative Explanations of Regulation

    Regulation in the Public Interest

    Safety and quality control Information, standards, product

    safety, responsibility and liability

    Social goals and redistribution Equitable distribution of costs,

    cross-subsidies

    Guaranteed service provision Security of supply, obligation to

    supply

    Regulation to Correct Market

    Failures

    Negative externalities Costs to third parties

    Inadequate provision ofpublic goods

    free rider (collective action)problems

    Natural monopolies Distortion of allocation of

    resources

    Abuse of dominant position Anti-competitive practices

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    10/18

    Positive Explanations of Regulation

    The Supplyof Regulation

    Electoral politics log rolling, pork-barrel politics,

    camping finance

    Bureaucratic politics over-supply, budget maximisation,

    bureau shaping

    Agency capture identification of regulator with

    industry interest

    The Demandfor Regulation

    Industry demand Incumbents demand protection

    New entrants demand access

    Interest group demand Industrial consumers

    Consumer protection agencies

    Political demand Party politics, interests, ideology

    Voters

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    11/18

    Institutional Explanations of Regulation

    The Design of Regulation

    Negotiated solutions, rule of the game balance of power between actors?

    the role of policy entrepreneurs?

    Appropriateness or historical fit compatibility with existing institutions?

    or ideas (learning) and legitimacy?

    Principals delegate power to agents The advantages of arms-length administration?

    How credible are the agents?

    How do the principals retain control ?

    Lock-ins (QWERTY)and de-politicisation

    is change irreversible, are rules fixed?

    The Evolution of Regulation

    Pre-capitalist roots - regulation infeudal Europe

    Private: guilds, self-regulation

    State: monopolies, licensed corporations

    The rise of the regulatory (industrial)state

    Regulation as part of state building in C19

    Anti-trust policy in the USA, New Deal

    The European welfare state, WW I + II

    The challenges to the interventionist

    state The crises of the welfare state Liberalisation, deregulation and re-regulation

    Globalisation

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    12/18

    The Messy Reality: The Policy Cycle and Process

    What is policy? (Hill, The public Policy Process, p.14-17) A course of action, or non-action A series of decisions

    It changes over time

    It evolves from existing policy

    It includes termination and succession

    It includes action without decisions

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    13/18

    3. Public Governance

    I. Max Weber and the rational state

    II. New Public Management and market basedsolutions

    III. New Governance and government beyondformal institutions

    Are all public goods and services equal?

    What concern to prioritise?

    Equity?

    Quality?

    Flexibility and adaptation?

    How to justify public goods

    provision?

    Choice Cost/benefit

    Individualchoice paternalism

    Societymajority rule common good

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    14/18

    Weber and rational governance

    The Weberian model of bureaucracy

    Rational, goal-oriented bureaucracy (1922) Politically neutral

    Predictable and equal treatment

    Written procedures

    Hierarchically organised Specialised and functional division of labour

    Fixed pay, recruitment and promotion procedures

    Authority linked to positions

    Motivation and control (Anthony Downs, 1956)

    Motivation linked to life long career, independence,professionalism, civil service ethos or mixed, several types?

    Control problems: size, resistance and counter-control

    Max Weber

    1864 - 1920

    M. Weber, Rationallegal authority and bureaucracy, from Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft

    http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.weltchronik.de/bio/cethegus/w/weberm.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.weltchronik.de/bio/cethegus/w/weberm.html&h=364&w=220&sz=24&hl=en&start=4&tbnid=OkcrzbQGamXM6M:&tbnh=121&tbnw=73&prev=/images?q=max+weber&gbv=2&svnum=10&hl=en
  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    15/18

    Critiques of Weber

    Supply problems Do bureaucrats lobby for bigger budgets? If so, do budgets

    always grow?

    Information asymmetry: do the principals know as much as the

    agents?

    Control problems: can principals control the agents?

    Demand problems The logic of collective action: all interest groups demand private

    goods => budgets grow

    The welfare coalition => a majority for more redistribution? Concentrated benefits and dispersed costs => budget growth?

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    16/18

    The turn toward markets

    William Niskanen and public choice

    analysis Bureaucrats self-interest

    Incentives to maximise budgets

    Asymmetric information

    Margaret Thatcher and the new right Interest groups demand, bureaucrats supply

    Information and control problems

    New solutions: efficiency and markets Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness

    P. Dunleavy,Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice, Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991, chapter 6

    http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.poster.net/thatcher-margaret/thatcher-margaret-photo-margaret-thatcher-6230207.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.postershop.com/Thatcher-Margaret/Thatcher-Margaret-Photo-Margaret-Thatcher-6230207.html&h=500&w=400&sz=49&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=w4eGpcke6Mdn-M:&tbnh=130&tbnw=104&prev=/images?q=thatcher&start=18&gbv=2&ndsp=18&svnum=10&hl=en&sa=N
  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    17/18

    A question of state capacity

    How increase statecapacity?

    A smaller state?

    A more effective state?

    International cooperation?

    Efficiency

    Scope

    F. Fukuyama, State Building, Cornell University Press, 2004, chapter 1

  • 8/11/2019 Studying the Policy Process l1

    18/18

    Modernising public services

    New Public Management disaggregation, competition, incentives

    => economy, efficiency, effectiveness

    Governance steering beyond government institutions

    problem-oriented, joined-up thinking

    blurring of public and private

    power dependence, coordination, bargaining

    multi-level, non-hierarchical, networks flexibility, innovation

    K. A. Eliassen & N. Sitter, Understanding Public Management, Sage 2008, chapter 5