Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10

Student Achievement Data DisplaysStudent Achievement Data DisplaysMathematics, Reading, Mathematics, Reading,

Writing and Science – Grade 10Writing and Science – Grade 10

Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took the test as ninth graders.

Revised: October 16, 2009

Official WASL ResultsOfficial WASL ResultsAYP StatusAYP StatusDistrict Reading & Writing Baseline District Reading & Writing Baseline ResultsResults

2

WASL WASL MathematicsMathematics: 2004-2009: 2004-2009

Grade 10Grade 10

Cascade High School

3

Grade 10 WASL: Grade 10 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in Math

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

Cascade HighSchool

50 44 50 53 49

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

4

Grade 10 WASL: Grade 10 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in MathSchool, District, & State

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

2004-05 50 47 44

2005-06 44 46 48

2006-07 50 53 50

2007-08 53 54 49

2008-09 49 52 45

Cascade High School District State

5

Grade 10 WASL–Mathematics: Grade 10 WASL–Mathematics: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals

10th Grade Math AYP

49.6

0

28.1

25.6

52.6

0

68

0

35

0102030405060708090

100

All

Am

eric

anIn

dian Blac

k

His

pani

c

Whi

te

Lim

ited

Eng

lish

Asia

n

Spec

ial

Educ

atio

n

Low

Inco

me

Margin of ErrorPercent meeting standard (07-08 thru 09-10 Goal=62.4)

Goal

Cascade High School

6

OSPI Report CardOSPI Report CardParticipation DetailParticipation Detail

7

Grade 10 WASL Mathematics: Grade 10 WASL Mathematics: Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Math Grade 10

2620

31

192229 30

14

24 26

35

16

3329

25

4

4035

16

2

0

20

40

60

80

100

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4Performance Level

Perc

ent i

n Le

vel 2004-05

2005-062006-072007-082008-09

Does not meet standard Meets standard

Cascade High School

Caution: High School proficiency level trends only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.

8

Grade 10 Number Sense:Grade 10 Number Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

Difference Between School and State Percents

-5

0 2

-23 -20

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Number Sense

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 22.7 22.1 42.8


Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.

9

Grade 10 Measurement:Grade 10 Measurement:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


-4 -2

5

-5 -9

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Measurement

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 32.4 30.2 40.9


10

Grade 10 Geometric Sense:Grade 10 Geometric Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


1

-3 -3-15 -12

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Geometric Sense

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 38.3 38.2 49.9


11

Grade 10 Probability & Statistics:Grade 10 Probability & Statistics:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


5

-5 -7-15 -13

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Probability & Statistics

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 20.7 21.0 33.2


12

Grade 10 Algebraic Sense:Grade 10 Algebraic Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


3

-6

0

-19 -19

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Algebraic Sense

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 30.1 31.7 49.4


13

Grade 10 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Grade 10 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


2

-8-2

-12-19

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Solves Problems/Reasons Logically

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 16.0 16.7 35.3


14

Grade 10 Communicates Understanding:Grade 10 Communicates Understanding:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


5

-4 -2 -5-12

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Communicates Understanding

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 29.3 34.1 41.4


15

Grade 10 Makes Connections:Grade 10 Makes Connections:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


3

-5

0

-1

-19

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Makes Connections

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 37.1 41.3 55.9


16

WASL WASL ReadingReading: 2004-2009: 2004-2009

Grade 10Grade 10

Cascade High School

17

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in Reading

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

Cascade HighSchool

81 80 86 84 85

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

18

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in ReadingSchool, District, & State

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

2004-05 81 76 65

2005-06 80 80 73

2006-07 86 85 81

2007-08 84 86 81

2008-09 85 86 81.2


19

Grade 10 WASL–Reading: Grade 10 WASL–Reading: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals

10th Grade Reading AYP

85.2

0

75.8

63.4

89.2

0

88.7

25.7

72.7

0102030405060708090

100

All

Am

eric

anIn

dian Blac

k

His

pani

c

Whi

te

Lim

ited

Eng

lish

Asia

n

Spec

ial

Educ

atio

n

Low

Inco

me

Margin of ErrorPercent meeting standard (07-08 thru 09-10 Goal=74.3)

Goal

Cascade High School

20

OSPI Report CardOSPI Report CardParticipation DetailParticipation Detail

21

Grade 10 WASL Reading Grade 10 WASL Reading Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Reading Grade 10

7 8

33

48

510

28

52

410

35

51

1321

37

171825

2921

0

20

40

60

80

100

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Performance Level

Perc

ent i

n Le

vel 2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09


Cascade High School


22

Grade 10 Literary Comprehension:Grade 10 Literary Comprehension:Comparison of School and StateComparison of School and State


5

-5

0

-18 -21

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Comprehension - Literary Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 52.4 55.7 73.6

Cascade High School

District State

Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.

23

Grade 10 Literary Analysis:Grade 10 Literary Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


6

-4 -2-14

-27

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Analyze & Interpret - Literary Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 50.0 57.7 76.9


24

Grade 10 Literary Thinking Critically: Grade 10 Literary Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


5

-3

0

-16-29

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Critical Thinking - Literary Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 47.6 56.0 76.1


25

Grade 10 Informational Comprehension: Grade 10 Informational Comprehension: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


4

-5 -4

-22 -24

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Comprehension - Informational Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 49.2 52.8 73.2


26

Grade 10 Informational Analysis:Grade 10 Informational Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


6

-1 -3

-24-18

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Analyze & Interpret - Informational Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 62.7 62.4 80.2


27

Grade 10 Informational Thinking Critically: Grade 10 Informational Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


2

-3

5

-22 -20

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Critical Thinking - Informational Text

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 57.1 59.8 76.6


28

SRA Reading Baseline - Grade 10SRA Reading Baseline - Grade 10 Reading Strands Reading Strands

Cascade High School - Grade 10Secondary Reading Assessments

Baseline

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Reading Strands

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Level 1

Level 2 Level 3

Level 4

Level 1 11.8% 24.8% 13.0%

Level 2 31.7% 31.7% 25.5%

Level 3 18.1% 19.2% 23.8%

Level 4 38.4% 24.3% 37.7%

BaselineComprehension

Baseline Analysis

BaselineCritical Thinking

COMPREHENSION ANALYSIS CRITICAL THINKING

29

SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 10SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 10Informational and Literary Sub-StrandsInformational and Literary Sub-Strands

Cascade High School - Grade 10District Reading Assessments 2009-10

Baseline by Informational & Literary Strands

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Informational & Literary Reading Strands

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Level 4

Level 1 2.8% 31.3% 11.8% 22.9% 34.5% 26.4%

Level 2 9.7% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3% 25.2% 25.0%

Level 3 25.5% 35.9% 34.5% 44.4% 23.1% 26.6%

Level 4 62.0% 32.9% 53.7% 20.4% 17.1% 22.0%

BaselineInformational

Comprehension


Analysis


Critical Thinking

BaselineLiterary

Comprehension

BaselineLiterary Analysis

BaselineLiterary Critical

Thinking

INFORMATIONALCOMPREHENSION

INFORMATIONALANALYSIS

INFORMATIONALCRITICAL THINKING

LITERARYCOMPREHENSION

LITERARYANALYSIS

LITERARYCRITICAL THINKING

30

WASL WASL WritingWriting: 2004-2009: 2004-2009

Grade 10Grade 10

Cascade High School

31

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in Writing

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

Cascade HighSchool

71 77 83 89 87

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

32

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance

Percent Meeting Standard in WritingSchool, District, & State

0

20

40

60

80

100

% m

eetin

g st

anda

rd

2004-05 71 68 65

2005-06 77 79 65

2006-07 83 85 84

2007-08 89 89 86

2008-09 87 88 87


33

Grade 10 WASL Writing Grade 10 WASL Writing Performance Levels TrendsPerformance Levels Trends

Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance LevelWriting - Grade 10

7

17

44

27

513

39 37

512

51

32

8 10

32

22

10.3

31.9 32.8

16.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4Performance Level

Perc

ent i

n Le

vel

2004-05

2005-062006-07

2007-08

2008-09

Cascade High School

Meets StandardDoes Not Meet Standard


34

Grade 10 Content, Organization, and Style:Grade 10 Content, Organization, and Style:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


100

-6 -6

-43-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Content, Organization, Style - Writing

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 37.7 46.9 80.5


Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009 Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.

35

Grade 10 Conventions (CON): Grade 10 Conventions (CON): Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State


1

-6 -5-14

-25

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Conventions - Writing

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 66.0 73.6 90.9


36

SWA Writing Baseline – Grade 10SWA Writing Baseline – Grade 10Writing StrandsWriting Strands

Cascade High School - Grade 10 District Writing Assessment 2009-10

Baseline

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Writing Strands

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s


Level 1 3.4% 2.5% 2.3% 5.0%

Level 2 21.1% 29.5% 23.6% 26.1%

Level 3 61.8% 63.4% 66.4% 66.6%

Level 4 13.7% 4.6% 7.8% 2.3%

BaselineContent

BaselineOrganizati

on

BaselineStyle

BaselineConvention

s

CONTENT CONVENTIONSSTYLEORGANIZATION

37

WASL Science: 2004-2009WASL Science: 2004-2009

Grade 10Grade 10

Cascade High School

Note: These data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took the test as ninth-graders.

38

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Science PerformanceScience Performance

Percent Meeting Science StandardSchool

0

1020

3040

50

6070

8090

100

Perc

ent M

eetin

g St

anda

rd

Cascade High School 36 23 35 48 48

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

39

Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Science PerformanceScience Performance

Percent Meeting Science StandardSchool, District, & State

0

20

40

60

80

100

Perc

ent M

eetin

g St

anda

rd

2004-05 36 34 36

2005-06 23 27 35

2006-07 35 40 36

2007-08 48 54 40

2008-09 48 51 39


40

WASL Science:WASL Science:Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Science Grade 10

40

20

34

1

44

23 22

1

2925

33

2

2419 20

0

24.417.3

43.4

4.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Performance Level

Per

cent

in L

evel

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09


Cascade High School


41

Grade 10 Properties, Structures, & Changes in Grade 10 Properties, Structures, & Changes in Systems: Comparison of School to StateSystems: Comparison of School to State

Properties of Systems

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 46.6 50.8 41.4



ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Difference between School and State Percents

-3 -7

3

-6

5

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

% p

oint

diff

eren

ce

Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009 Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.

42

Grade 10 Inquiry in Science:Grade 10 Inquiry in Science:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

Difference between School and State Percents

-3-14

-5 -7

6

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

% p

oint

diff

eren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Inquiry in Science

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 49.3 53.3 43.1


43

Grade 10 Applications in Science:Grade 10 Applications in Science:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

Difference between School and State Percents

-1-11

82 1

-50

-25

0

25

50

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

% p

oint

diff

eren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

ent

School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Designing Solutions

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 48.0 52.6 46.6


Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10

Documents

Transcript of Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10