Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research
description
Transcript of Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research
![Page 2: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
HSR IN THE 21ST HSR IN THE 21ST CENTURYCENTURY
Interdisciplinary
Intersectoral
Nationally Representative, Locally Connected
Researchers & Decision-Makers
![Page 3: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Networking Linkage between researchers and
decision makers Knowledge transfer, exchange and integration Training and capacity Advocacy for research and its more
effective use in planning, practice, andpolicy-making
![Page 4: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CO-AUTHORS
Allan Best, Ph.D.Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
Enette PauzéUniversity of Toronto
Jennifer L. Terpstra, MPHUniversity of British Columbia
Gregg MoorInSource
![Page 5: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Core concepts
Knowledge to Action models
Mandate for embedded research
Tools for local agencies
Summary and discussion
![Page 6: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
COMPARISON OF KNOWLEDGE TYPES
MODE I Focus is knowledge
generation Basic to applied
research Scientist as expert Clear standards of
knowledge
MODE II Focus is problem
solving Learn by doing Knowledge is co
created and context dependent
Flexible methods & general guidelines for quality
Denis JL et al. In Lemieux-Charles L & Champagne F. Using Knowledge and Evidence in Health Care, U of T Press, 2005
![Page 8: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SYSTEMS THINKING ~ ZONES OF COMPLEXITY
Zone of Complexity
Chaos
Plan andControl
Low
High
HighLow
Professional/Social Agreementabout Outcomes
Certainty aboutOutcomes
Source: Stacey, 1996. As in Crossing the Quality Chasm
![Page 9: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PROBLEM-BASED RESEARCH
Build teams
Think through
problems
Integrate
perspectives
Foster systems
change
““For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong””
H.L.Mencken
![Page 11: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Generations of Knowledge Thinking1: Linear Models (1960s-mid 90s)
LANGUAGE KEY ASSUMPTIONS Dissemination Diffusion Knowledge transfer Knowledge uptake
Knowledge is a product Key process is a handoff from research producers to research users Knowledge is generalizable across contexts is a function of effective packaging
![Page 12: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Generations of Knowledge Thinking2: Relationship Models (Mid-90s to
present)
LANGUAGE KEY ASSUMPTIONS Knowledge exchange
Knowledge from multiple sources research, theory, and practice
Key process is interpersonal, involving social relationships
Networks of research producers and research consumers
Collaborate thru production-synthesis-integration cycle Knowledge is context-linked, and must be adapted to local setting
Degree of use is a function of effective relationships and processes
![Page 13: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Generations of Knowledge Thinking3: Systems Models
LANGUAGE KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Knowledge integration
Knowledge translation
Knowledge mobilization
Knowledge exchange and uptake
Knowledge cycle is tightly woven within priorities, culture, and context
Explicit and tacit knowledge need to be integrated to inform decision making and policy
Relationships mediate throughout the cycle, and must be understood from a systems perspective, in the context of the organization and its strategic processes
Degree of use is a function of effective integration with the organization(s) and its systems
![Page 14: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SEMINAL ARTICLES
CHANGE THEORYGrol, Richard, et al. Planning and studying
improvement in patient care.Milbank Quarterly 2007; 85:93-138.
KNOWLEDGE TO ACTION MODELSVan de Ven, Andrew, & Johnson, Paul.
Knowledge for theory and practice.Academy of Management Review2006; 31:802-821.
Van de Ven, A. Engaged Scholarship. Oxford, 2007
![Page 15: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
VAN DE VEN’STHREE LENSES
1. Knowledge transfer problem
2. Problem is different theory and practice
knowledge
3. Knowledge production problem
“Engaged Scholarship”
![Page 16: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LINKING CHANGE THEORY TO KTA
TRANSFER
(linear)
EXCHANGE
(relationship)
CO-PRODUCTION
(systems)
Cognitive Educational Motivational Communications
Social learning Social network and influence Teamwork
Complexity Leadership Organizational culture, learning and innovation Quality Management and integrated care
![Page 17: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
FROM KTA THEORYTO MENTAL MODELS
NCIC VAN DE VEN MENTAL MODEL
linear transfer linear
relationship exchange circular
systems co-production dynamic
![Page 18: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Linear Models ~ Two Stage Translational Research
Crowley WF et al. JAMA 2004;291:1120-1126.
![Page 19: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Circular Models ~Planned Action
Graham ID et al. J Cont Ed in the Health Professions 2006; 26:13-24.
![Page 20: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Circular Models 2 ~ NHS Systems Change
Kelly MP, Speller V, & Meyrick J (2004). London: Health Development Agency,
http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=502709
![Page 21: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
COMMUNICATION AND INFLUENCE
DIFFUSION(Informal, unplanned) Social networks Homophily Peer opinion
Marketing Expert opinion Champions Boundary spanners Change agents
DISSEMINATION(formal, planned)
SYSTEM READINESS FOR INNOVATION
Tension for changeInnovation-system fitPower balances (supporters vs opponents)Assessment of implicationsDedicated time / resourcesMonitoring and feedback
THE OUTER CONTEXT
Socio-political climateIncentives and mandatesInter-organisational norm-setting & networksEnvironmental stability
User system
Adoption / assimilation
System antecedents
System readiness
Implementation
ConsequencesOuter context
Knowledge purveyors
Resource system
The innovation
Change agency
Dissemination
Diffusion
LINKAGE
LINKAGE
LINKAGEDesign stage Implementation stage Shared meanings and mission Communication and information Effective knowledge transfer User orientation User involvement in specification Product augmentation e.g. technical help Capture of user-led innovation Project management support
THE IMPLEMENTATIONPROCESS
Decision-making devolved to front line teamsHands-on approach by leaders and managersHuman resource issues, especially training Dedicated resourcesInternal communicationExternal collaborationReinvention/developmentFeedback on progress
SYSTEM ANTECEDENTS FOR INNOVATION
Structure Size/maturity Formalisation Differentiation Decentralisation Slack resources
Receptive context for change Leadership and vision Good managerial relations Risk-taking climate Clear goals and priorities High quality data capture
Absorptive capacity for new knowledge Pre-existing knowledge/skills base Ability to find, interpret, re-codify and integrate new knowledge Enablement of knowledge sharing via internal and external networks
THE ADOPTER
Needs MotivationValues and goalsSkills Learning style Social networks
THE INNOVATION
Relative advantageCompatibilityLow complexityTrialability ObservabilityPotential for reinventionRiskTask issuesNature of knowledge required (tacit/explicit)Technical support
ASSIMILATION
Complex, non-linear process‘Soft periphery’ elements
![Page 22: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Systems Model ~ Estabrooks and Glasgow AJPM 2006; 31:S45-56
Tested in
Peer SharingGroup feedback
Sense of DistinctionGroup goal setting
Group Roles
Team-building PA Interventions Organization
Clinic
HealthEducators
Delivery Sites
Fit
Practical Controlled
Trial
AppropriateFor Question
Partnerships across organizationalstructure defined necessary results for decision to deliver broadly across multiple clinics
Broader Health Policy and Cultural Context
1. National Organizational CampaignTo Promote Healthy Lifestyles
2. Prevention Department Desire to Provide PA Program
Diverse Samples
Multiple Settings
Fre
qu
en
t C
on
tac
t
Re
se
arc
h S
taff D
eliv
ery
Sp
ac
e L
imit
s
Lim
ited
Sta
ff Tim
e
Approval of PIC & MOA
Clinic Staff Engagement
Prevention Department
Prim
ary
Ca
re
Scheduling, Cost, & Co-pay
Ele
ctr
on
ic M
ed
ica
l R
ec
ord
MOVE MORE Re-invention of
intervention retainingcritical elements but
reducing contact
Critical Elements
Note: PIC=Physician in Charge; MOA=Medical Office Administrator
![Page 23: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Core concepts
Knowledge to Action models
Mandate for embedded research
• Interorganizational partnerships
• Embedded structures
Tools for local agencies
Summary and discussion
![Page 24: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
OBSSR/CHSRF RAPID REVIEW OF PARTNERSHIPS
Clear common aims Trust Collaborative leadership Sensitivity to power issues Membership structure Action learning
![Page 25: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
EMBEDDED RESEARCH
Intersectoral collaboration for problem-based research
Primacy of Mode II Blended funding ~ grants, contracts, platform Close collaboration between producers and
users Shared governance and accountability
![Page 26: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
VANCOUVER“DIALOGUE ON HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH”
“Explore how research can be better realized in BC to support decision makers”
15 senior decision makers, 15 research leaders 2 extended breakfasts - define the gap, seek solutions Provocateurs - Steven Lewis, Hugh MacLeod, Jeanette Ward,
Penny Hawe RESULTS
Shared understand is a complex adaptive system Infrastructure and policies don’t support linkage Measurement and evaluation need to be built in Must build the business case
![Page 27: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CAHSPR COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE FOR EMBEDDED
RESEARCH
Supported by CAHSPR ~ member association with some 200 student members
Linked to national health services and policy research training programs
Demand from next generation Web-based, student driven Directors from 14 centres and training
programs in six countries Priority on ways to involve students early
![Page 28: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Core concepts
Knowledge to Action models
Mandate for embedded research
Tools for local agencies
Summary and discussion
![Page 29: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ACTION RESEARCH
WHOLE SYSTEMS METHODS REFINING METHODS
ConceptMapping
SystemDynamics
NetworkAnalysis
KnowledgeIntegration
AdministrativeDatabases
Surveillance, Info Systems, Report Cards
STRATEGIC CHANGESTRATEGIC CHANGE
Rapid Learning Systems*
Systematic reviews
Better Practices Toolbox
*Etheredge L, Health Affairs 2007 26(2): w107-w118
![Page 30: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CONCEPT MAPPINGCONCEPT MAPPING
Change Organizational Culture and Structure
Stakeholder Collaboration
Incentives and Funding
Data and Accountability Systems
Learning Infrastructure
Organizational Culture and Structure
Enhance Data Systems andCapacity
Ensure Quality and Accountability
Respond to StakeholderPriorities
Develop Participatory/ActionResearch Strategies
Fund and FacilitateIntegration Activities
Provide Incentives to Apply Research Findings
Implement InnovativeProfessional Training
Promote Evidence Based Practice Share Findings in the
Context of Practice
![Page 31: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ANOTHER KTA MENTAL MODEL
Organizational Culture and
Structure
Learning Infrastructur
e
Incentives and
Funding
Stakeholder Collaboratio
n
Data and Accountability Systems
![Page 32: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
SYSTEM DYNAMIC EXAMPLE FROM ISIS
Smokers
Tobacco marketingactivities
Fraction of peoplesmoking
Smoking as asocial norm
People startingsmoking
Tobaccorevenues
+
+ +
+
++
+
Tobacco productsavailability
+
Tobaccogrowers
+
+
![Page 33: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
SYSTEM DYNAMIC EXAMPLE FROM ISIS ~ 2
Funding for tobaccocontrol programs
Gov. incomefrom tabacco
taxes
Tobacco controlprograms
Smokers
Perceived importance tofocus on other health
programs
Public awarenessof tobaccohealth risk
Pressure on tobaccocompanies to reducemarketing activities
Tobacco marketingactivities
Taxrevenues
fromsmokers
+
+
+
-
+
People quittingsmoking
-
Fraction of peoplesmoking
Smoking as asocial norm
People startingsmoking
Tobaccorevenues
+
+ +
+
++
+
Health care costs
+
Health insurerscoverage of tobacco
quitting costs
+
+
Researchersawarness of
tobacco healthrisk
Funding fortobacco health
research+
+
Govt awarenessof tobaccohealth risk
+
-
Pro-tobaccocontituencies
Anti-tobaccoconstituencies
++ +
+
Tobacco productsavailability
+
Tobaccogrowers
+
+
+
++
+
Govt willingness tolegislate tobacco
control
- + +
Tobaccotaxes
Govt funding oftobacco control
--
Trend in tobaccocompany revenues
+
-
Anti-smokinglegislation
-
![Page 34: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS
![Page 35: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Realist review methodology (Pawson, et al. 2005)
Targeted literature review Virtual expert panel Scheduled modified e-Delphi process over 3 months Report providing practical understanding of theoretical frameworks and/or evidence-based interventions
Sense making process to tailor results to local context
RAPID REVIEW METHODOLOGY
![Page 36: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
EVIDENCE IN CONTEXT
Context-sensitive
Context-free
RIGOUR
USEFULNESS
SystematicReview
DeliberativeProcess
X
X
![Page 37: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
RAPID REVIEWS TO DATE
Person-centred care Healthy Weights Population-based chronic disease self
management support Interorganizational partnerships Evidence-informed public health policy Telehealth services for regional chronic
disease management strategy
![Page 38: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ANOTHER KTAMENTAL MODEL
Adapted from Barr et al, HospitalQuarterly 2003; 7:73-82
![Page 39: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Knowledge to Action modelsImplications for partnershipsTools for local agenciesSummary and discussion
![Page 40: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
1. REVOLUTION IN ACADEMIA
Van de Ven’s “engaged scholarship” Gabriele Bammer’s “integration and
implementation science” ~ Bammer G. Ecology and Society 2005; 10(2):6 www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/• Systems thinking and complexity science• Participatory methods• Knowledge management, exchange and implementation
Implications for early training? Career
paths?
![Page 41: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
2. REVOLUTION IN SERVICE
Research a line item competing with patient service
Transformative versus incremental strategy
Implications for incorporating training?
Career paths?
![Page 42: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
3. REVOLUTION IN SCIENCE
Generalizable versus contextual knowledgeBehaviour change AND system dynamicsClinical versus public health evidence
Implications for funding Type II and
embedded research? Career paths?
![Page 43: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
NEEDS YOU!NEEDS YOU!
![Page 44: Structure and Process for KTE: Growing Canada ’ s capacity for embedded research](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/5681545e550346895dc2762c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
www.cahspr.ca