Stemi vs Nstemi

download Stemi vs Nstemi

of 31

Transcript of Stemi vs Nstemi

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    1/31

    Treatment Guidelines for ST-segment

    Elevation Myocardial Infarction(STEMI) and Non ST-segment Elevation

    Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)

    Brady Helmink

    University of Nebraska Medical Center

    College of Pharmacy

    Class of 2013 Pharm.D. candidate

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    2/31

    Objectives

    Understand which conditions classify as Acute

    Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

    Identify the difference between the presentation ofNSTEMI vs. STEMI

    Know how to stratify patients with NSTEMI using the

    TIMI risk score

    Compare and contrast treatment algorithms for high

    and low-risk patients with NSTEMI

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    3/31

    Objectives

    Explain how the pathophysiology of STEMI differs

    from NSTEMI

    Understand the importance of PCI and time torevascularization in both NSTEMI and STEMI

    Recognize the significance of fibrinolytic agents and

    their place in therapy Discuss similarities and differences between the

    treatment of STEMI and NSTEMI

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    4/31

    Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

    Refers to anginal symptoms at rest for > 20 minutes;may or may not be relieved by SL NTG

    Three categories ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

    Non ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)

    Unstable Angina (UA)

    Management focused on rapid diagnosis, riskstratification, and therapies to restore coronary bloodflow and reduce myocardial ischemia

    DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New

    York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    5/31

    Patient Case

    BC, a 61 year-old female presents to the Onawa

    ER with progressive substernal chest pain radiating

    up into her neck and jaw over the past four days Initial EKG showed non-specific T wave changes and

    cardiac troponin levels were elevated at 1.3

    Coronary arteriography showed 90% stenosis ofthe LAD

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    6/31

    Patient Case (cont.)

    Past medical history of DM 2, HTN, HLD, depression

    and recurrent bronchitis. Patient is a long-standing

    and ongoing tobacco user, and also has a positivefamily history of CAD

    Home medications include ASA 81mg daily,

    metoprolol XL 25mg daily, HCTZ 12.5mg daily,

    lisinopril 20mg daily, cymbalta 60mg daily, apidra

    on sliding scale, and lantus 25 units QHS

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    7/31

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    8/31

    NSTEMI

    Defined as angina at rest for > 20 min without ST-

    segment elevation, but with a rise in cardiac

    markers

    Pathophysiology

    Abrupt in myocardial oxygen supply

    Thrombus formation on an atherosclerotic plaque

    Management depends on risk stratification

    TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk score

    DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New

    York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    9/31

    Risk Stratification for NSTEMI

    One point is assigned for each of the following riskfactors1. Age 65 years

    2. 3 or more CHD risk factors: smoking, hypercholesterolemia,hypertension, diabetes mellitus, family history of prematureCHD death/events

    3. Known CAD (50% stenosis of at least one major coronaryartery on coronary angiogram)

    4. Aspirin use within the past 7 days5. 2 or more episodes of chest discomfort within the past 24 hrs

    6. ST-segment depression 0.5 mm

    7. Positive biochemical marker for infarction

    Antman, EM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication andtherapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000 Aug 16; 284(7):835-42

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    10/31

    Patient Case

    BC, a 61 year-old female presents to the Onawa

    ER with progressive substernal chest pain radiating

    up into her neck and jaw over the past four daysMultiple episodes of chest pain

    Initial EKG showed non-specific T wave changes and

    troponin levels were elevated at 1.3Positive

    cardiac markers

    Coronary arteriography showed 90% stenosis of

    the LADKnown CAD

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    11/31

    Patient Case (cont.)

    Past medical history of DM 2, HTN, HLD, depressionand recurrent bronchitis. Patient is a long-standingand ongoing tobacco user, and also has a positive

    family history of CAD 3 CHD riskequivalents

    Home medications include ASA 81mg daily,metoprolol XL 25mg daily, HCTZ 12.5mg daily,lisinopril 20mg daily, cymbalta 60mg daily, apidraon sliding scale, and lantus 25 units QHSASAuse in the past 7 days

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    12/31

    TIMI risk score for NSTEMI

    High-risk Medium-risk Low-risk

    TIMI risk score TIMI risk Score TIMI risk score

    57 points 34 points 02 points

    TIMI risk scoreMortality, MI, or severe recurrent ischemic requiring urgent

    target vessel revascularization

    0/1 4.7%

    2 8.3%

    3 13.2%

    4 19.9%5 26.2%

    6/7 40.9%

    DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New

    York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    13/31

    Invasive vs. Conservative strategy

    Invasive (high-risk patients)

    Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation therapies followed by

    revascularization

    Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)OR Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

    Conservative (low-risk patients)

    Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation therapies followed bywatchful waiting

    Hoenig MR, Aroney CN, Scott IA. Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation

    myocardial infarction in the stent era. Corchrane Database Syst review 2010; Mar 17; 3:CD004815.

    Mahoney M, Jurkovitz CT, Chu H, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the

    treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA2002; 288: 1851

    8185.

    Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patientswith ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary

    Intervention. 2009; 120: 22712306.

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    14/31

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    15/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    NSTEMI

    Antiplatelet therapy

    Aspirin162-325mg chewed immediately and 81-162mg

    continued indefinitely

    Clopidogrel600mg load for pts undergoing PCI and 75mgdaily continued for at least 12 months

    +/- GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (only for high risk patients who are

    likely to undergo invasive strategy: elevated troponin or ST-

    segment depression)o Eptifibatide (Integrilin) Two180mcg/kg boluses 10min apart,

    followed by a 2mcg/kg/minute infusion for 72-96 hours

    Quantitative comparison of clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel and ticagrelor, against clopidogrel 300 mg on major

    adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding in coronary stenting: synthesis of CURRENT-OASIS-7, TRITON-

    TIMI-38 and PLATO. Int J Cardiol.2012 Jul 12; 158(2): 181-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

    Giugliano, Robert P. et al. Early versus Delayed, Provisional Eptifibatide in Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med

    2009; 360: 2176-2190

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    16/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    NSTEMI

    Anticoagulation

    Heparin60-70 units/kg IV bolus, followed by 12-15units/kg/hr continuous IV infusiono

    DC Heparin when going to PCIOR

    Enoxaparin1mg/kg Q12hrs

    OR

    Bivalirudinwith PCI, give 0.75mg/kg IV bolus,followed by continuous IV infusion 1.75mg/kg/hr. DC atend of procedure or continue for up to 4 hours

    Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in High-Risk Patients With NonST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary

    Syndromes Managed With an Intended Early Invasive Strategy. JAMA. 2004; 292(1): 45-54.

    Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med2006;

    355: 2203-2216.

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    17/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    NSTEMI

    Beta blockers

    Metoprolol IV 5mg given over 1-2 minutes Q5min X 3 doses;convert to PO 25-50mg Q6hrs

    Nitrates

    SL NTG Q5min X 3 doses

    IV NTG for pts with refractory angina

    o 5-10mcg/min IV; by 10mcg/min Q5min to a max of 100mcg/min

    Morphine Sulfate

    2-5mg IV Q5-30min PRN pain

    DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New

    York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    18/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    NSTEMI

    ACE inhibitors

    HOPE trialo Attenuates the ventricular remodeling process

    o Early administration mortality in AMI patients

    Statins

    Helps with long-term atherosclerotic plaque stabilizationo High doses most beneficial (treat to LDL < 70 mg/dL)

    Effects of an Angiotensin-ConvertingEnzyme Inhibitor, Ramipril, on Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Patients. N Engl

    J Med 2000; 342: 145-153

    Daga, Lal C., Upendra Kaul, and Aijaz Mansoor. "Approach to STEMI and NSTEMI." J Assoc Physicians India. 2011

    Dec; 59 Suppl: 19-25

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    19/31

    BC received

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    20/31

    Patient Case

    Heparin 6000 unit IV bolus (70 units/kg), followed by

    1200 units/hr (14 units/kg/hr) continuous IV infusion*

    ASA 162mg daily*

    Clopidogrel 300mg load, followed by 75mg daily*

    Lisinopril 10mg daily

    Metoprolol XL 25mg BID

    Morphine 2mg IV Q2hrs PRN NTG SL 2 tablets relieved symptoms

    NTG IV cont. 250mL bottle titrated to pain free*

    Simvastatin 80mg initially, followed by 40mg daily

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    21/31

    Patient Case

    Procedure

    PCI w/ placement of drug eluting stent in LAD

    Medications (given intra-arterial)

    Heparin 3000 units

    NTG 600mcg initially, 400mcg after 30min

    Bivalirudin 65mg, or 13 mL IV bolus (0.75mg/kg),

    followed by continuous IV infusion of 30mL/hr

    (1.75mg/kg/hr). DCd at end of procedure

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    22/31

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    23/31

    STEMI

    Defined as prolonged chest discomfort unrelieved

    by SL NTG with ST-segment elevation on EKG and a

    rise in cardiac markers

    Pathophysiology

    Total or near-total thrombotic occlusion of a coronary

    artery

    Management involves immediate reperfusiontherapy (PCI preferred)

    Door-to-balloon time is 90 minutes

    DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. New

    York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    24/31

    Fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI

    If > 90 minutes from nearest cardiac cath lab,fibrinolytic therapy can risk of mortality

    Door-to-needle time is 30 minutes

    Fibrinolyticsmay be administered if patient presentswithin 12 hrs of symptom onset

    t-PA (alteplase)

    r-PA (retaplase)

    TNK (tenecteplase)

    Shown to open occluded artery in 60-90% of pts and mortality by 20%

    Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: theASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 Aug 28; 354(9180): 716-22.

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    25/31

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    26/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    STEMI

    Antiplatelet therapy

    Aspirin162-325mg chewed immediately and 81-

    162mg continued indefinitely Clopidogrel300mg load for pts undergoing PCI or

    receiving fibrinolytic and 75mg daily continued for at

    least 14 days and up to12 months

    Generally do not use GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the settingof STEMI due to no improvement in outcomes and an

    increased risk of bleeding

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    27/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    NSTEMI

    Anticoagulation

    With fibrinolytic Heparin60 units/kg IV bolus, followed by 12 units/kg

    continuous IV infusion

    OR

    Enoxaparin30mg IV bolus, followed by 1mg/kg Q12hrs

    Without fibrinolytic Heparin60-70 units/kg IV bolus, followed by 12-15

    units/kg continuous IV infusion

    OR

    Enoxaparin1mg/kg Q12hrs

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    28/31

    Pharmacologic Management of

    STEMI

    Beta blockers

    Nitrates

    Morphine Sulfate

    ACE inhibitors

    Statins

    Dosing similar to

    NSTEMI

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    29/31

  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    30/31

    References

    1. DiPiro, Joseph T. "Chapter 24. Acute Coronary Syndromes." Pharmacotherapy: APathophysiologic Approach. New York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2011. Access Pharmacy.http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196

    2. Antman, EM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A methodfor prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000 Aug 16; 284(7):835-42.

    3. Hoenig MR, Aroney CN, Scott IA. Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstableangina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Corchrane Database Systreview 2010;Mar 17;3:CD004815.

    4. Mahoney M, Jurkovitz CT, Chu H, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vsconservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. JAMA2002;288:18518185.

    5. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines forthe Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ACC/AHA/SCAIGuidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. 2009;120:22712306.

    6. Quantitative comparison of clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel and ticagrelor, againstclopidogrel 300 mg on major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding in coronarystenting: synthesis of CURRENT-OASIS-7, TRITON-TIMI-38 and PLATO. Int J Cardiol.2012Jul 12;158(2):181-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

    http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196http://www.accesspharmacy.com/content.aspx?aID=7972196
  • 8/10/2019 Stemi vs Nstemi

    31/31