Standard vs. Law - LBCG€¦ · Honda Engineering North America, Inc. 24000 Honda Parkway,...
Transcript of Standard vs. Law - LBCG€¦ · Honda Engineering North America, Inc. 24000 Honda Parkway,...
Standard vs. Law
R. Todd Dickey Engineering Coordinator Honda Engineering North America, Inc. 24000 Honda Parkway, Marysville, OH 43040 [email protected] |
} ISO 10218-1, 2011 ◦ Robot Manufacturers
} ISO 10218-2, 2011 ◦ Robot System Integrators
} ISO TS 15066, 2016 ◦ Collaborative robot guidance
} ANSI/RIA R15.06-2012 ◦ Manufacturers and Integrators ◦ Cross references to US standards
} CAN/CSA-Z434-14 ◦ Manufacturers and Integrators ◦ User requirements ◦ National deviations
} ISO/TC 299 (formerly TC 184/SC2) ◦ 24 Participating member countries � Austria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
◦ 9 Observing member counties � Belgium, Bulgaria, India, Israel, Norway, Pakistan,
Poland, Serbia, Slovakia
} United States ◦ OSHA (via General Duty Clause)
} Canada ◦ Ontario Ministry of Labor (PHSR)
} European Union (and EFTA countries, plus Turkey) ◦ EU-OSHA
� Machinery Directive (manufacture of machines) � Product Directives (low voltage, EMC, ATEX) � Work Equipment Directive (users of machines)
} Japan ◦ Ministry of Labor
� Enforcing Pressure and Force limits found in TS15066 } India ◦ Bureau of Indian Standards
} Korea ◦ Occupational Safety and Health Standards
} All regulatory agencies strive to assure an employer furnish to each of its employees a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.
} The following documents provide guidance on assessing risk
◦ ISO 12100 � Specifies principles of risk assessment and risk reduction ◦ ISO 14121 � Provides hazard analysis guidance ◦ ANSI B11.0 � Also, specifies principles of risk assessment and risk
reduction � Compliance with this standard will result in compliance with
ISO 12100 ◦ RIA TR R15.306 � References ANSI B11.0 for process methodology, but has
specific robot application analysis tools (scoring)
} Reducing risks through engineering controls ◦ ISO 13849 will produce the following: � Performance Levels (PL)
� PL a, PL b, PL c, PL d, PL e � Structure Categories (Cat.)
� Cat. B, Cat. 1, Cat. 2, Cat. 3, Cat. 4 ◦ IEC 62061 � Safety Integrity Levels (SIL)
� -, 1, 2, 3, 4
} It is ultimately the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe working environment.
} Most regulatory agencies don’t get involved until there is a reporting of an unsafe condition or an accident. ◦ Ontario, Canada is an exception (PHSR)
} Functional safety ensures that safety functions relying on a control system will be effective for the associated risk(s).
} Adherence to the guidance in the various industrial robot standards, technical specifications and technical reports will produce a safe machine.
} An integrator should always check with the country of destination for any national deviations.