arX

iv:0

806.

1067

v1 [

astr

o-ph

] 5

Jun

2008

Stable quarks of the 4th family?

K. Belotsky1, M. Khlopov1,2, K. Shibaev1

1) Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia;

Center for Cosmoparticle physics “Cosmion”, Moscow, Russia

2) APC laboratory, Paris, France

Abstract

Existence of metastable quarks of new generation can be embedded into phe-nomenology of heterotic string together with new long rangeinteraction, which onlythis new generation possesses. We discuss primordial quarkproduction in the earlyUniverse, their successive cosmological evolution and astrophysical effects, as well aspossible production in present or future accelerators. In case of a charge symmetryof 4th generation quarks in Universe, they can be stored in neutral mesons, doublypositively charged baryons, while all the doubly negatively charged ”baryons” arecombined with He-4 into neutral nucleus-size atom-like states. The existence of allthese anomalous stable particles may escape present experimental limits, being closeto present and future experimental test. Due to the nuclear binding with He-4 pri-mordial lightest baryons of the 4th generation with charge+1 can also escape theexperimental upper limits on anomalous isotopes of hydrogen, being compatible withupper limits on anomalous lithium. While 4th quark hadrons are rare, their presencemay be nearly detectable in cosmic rays, muon and neutrino fluxes and cosmic electro-magnetic spectra. In case of charge asymmetry, a nontrivialsolution for the problemof dark matter (DM) can be provided by excessive (meta)stable anti-up quarks of 4thgeneration, bound with He-4 in specific nuclear-interacting form of dark matter. Suchcandidate to DM is surprisingly close to Warm Dark Matter by its role in large scalestructure formation. It catalyzes primordial heavy element production in Big BangNucleosynthesis and new types of nuclear transformations around us.

1 Introduction

The question about existence of new quarks and/or leptons isamong the most importantin the modern particle physics. Possibility of existence ofnew (meta)stable quarks whichform new (meta)stable hadrons is of special interest. New stable hadrons can play the roleof strongly interacting dark matter [1–3]. This question isbelieved to find solution in theframework of future Grand Unified Theory. A strong motivation for existence of new long-living hadrons comes from a possible solution [4] of the ”doublet-triplet splitting” problemin supersymmetric GUT models. Phenomenology of string theory offers another motivationfor new long lived hadrons.

A natural extension of the Standard model can lead in the heterotic string phenomenol-ogy to the prediction of fourth generation of quarks and leptons [5, 6] with a stable 4th

1

neutrino [7–10]. The comparison between the rank of the unifying groupE6 (r = 6) andthe rank of the Standard model (r = 4) can imply the existence of new conserved charges.These charges can be related with (possibly strict) gauge symmetries. New strict gaugeU(1) symmetry (similar to U(1) symmetry of electrodynamics) is excluded for known par-ticles but is possible, being ascribed to the fermions of 4thgeneration only. This providestheoretic motivation for a stability of the lightest fermion of 4th generation, assumed tobe neutrino. Under the condition of existence of strictly conserved charge, associated to4th generation, the lightest 4th generation quarkQ (eitherU or D) can decay only to 4thgeneration leptons owing to GUT-type interactions, what makes it sufficiently long living.

Whatever physical reason was for a stability of new hypothetical particles, it extendspotential for testing respective hypothesis due to its implications in cosmology. Especiallyrich in this sense is a hypothesis on (meta)stable quarks of new family. It defines the goalof current work.

As we will show, in the case when 4th generation possesses strictly conservedU(1)-gauge charge (which will be calledy-charge), 4th generation fermions are the source of newinteraction of Coulomb type (which we’ll call furthery-interaction). It can be crucial forviability of model with equal amounts of 4th generation quarks and antiquarks in Universe.The case of cosmological excess of 4th generation antiquarks offers new form of dark matterwith a very unusual properties. Owing to strict conservation of y-charge, this excess shouldbe compensated by excess of 4th generation neutrinos.

Recent analysis [11] of precision data on the Standard modelparameters admits exis-tence of the 4th generation particles, satisfying direct experimental constraints which putlower limit 220 GeV for the mass of lightest quark [12].

If the lifetime of the lightest 4th generation quark exceedsthe age of the Universe,primordialQ-quark (andQ-quark) hadrons should be present in the modern matter. If thislifetime is less than the age of the Universe, there should beno primordial 4th generationquarks, but they can be produced in cosmic ray interactions and be present in cosmic rayfluxes. The search for this quark is a challenge for the present and future accelerators.

In the present work we will assume that up-quark of 4th generation (U ) is lighter than itsdown-quark (D). The opposite assumption is found to be virtually excluded, if D is stable.The reason is thatD-quarks might form stable hadrons with electric charges±1 ((DDD)−,(Du)+, (DDD)+), which eventually form hydrogen-like atoms (hadron(DDD)− is com-bined with4He++ into +1 bound state), being strongly constrained in surrounding matter.It will become more clear from consideration ofU -quark case, presented below.

The following hadron states containing (meta)stableU -quarks (U-hadrons) are ex-pected to be (meta)stable and created in early Universe: “baryons” (Uud)+, (UUu)++,(UUU)++; “antibaryons”(U U U)−−, (U U u)−−, meson(Uu)0. The absence in the Uni-verse of the states(U ud), (Uu) containing light antiquarks are suppressed because ofbaryon asymmetry. Stability of double and tripleU bound states(UUu), (UUU) and(U U u), (U U U) is provided by the large chromo-Coulomb binding energy (∝ α2

QCD ·mQ)[13,14]. Formation of these states in particle interactions at accelerators and in cosmic raysis strongly suppressed, but they can form in early Universe and cosmological analysis oftheir relics can be of great importance for the search for 4thgeneration quarks.

We analyze the mechanisms of production of metastableU (andU ) hadrons in the earlyUniverse, cosmic rays and accelerators and point the possible signatures of their existence.

2

We’ll show that in case of charge symmetry of U-quarks in Universe, a few conditionsplay a crucial role for viability of the model. An electromagnetic binding of(U U U)−−

with 4He++ into neutral nucleus-size atom-like state (O-Helium ) should be accompa-nied by a nuclear fusion of(Uud)+ and4He++ into lithium-like isotope[4He(Uud)] inearly Universe. The realization of such a fusion requires a marginal supposition concerningrespective cross section. Furthermore, assumption ofU(1)-gauge nature of the charge, asso-ciated to U-quarks, is needed to avoid a problem of overproduction of anomalous isotopesby means of any-annihilation of U-relics ([4He(Uud)], (UUu), (UUU), 4He(U U U),4He(U U u), (Uu)). Residual amount of U-hadrons with respect to baryons in this case isestimated to be less than10−10 in Universe in toto and less than10−20 at the Earth.

A negative sign charge asymmetry of U-quarks in Universe canprovide a nontrivialsolution for dark matter (DM) problem. For strictly conserved charge such asymmetry inUimplies corresponding asymmetry in leptons of 4th generation. In this case the most ofU inUniverse are contained inO-Helium states[4He(U U U)] and minor part of them in mesonsUu. On the other hand the set of direct and indirect effects of relic U-hadrons existenceprovides the test in cosmic ray and underground experimentswhich can be decisive forthis hypothesis. The main observational effects for asymmetric case do not depend on theexistence ofy-interaction.

The structure of this paper is as the following. Section 2 is devoted to the charge sym-metric case of U-quarks. Cosmological evolution of U-quarks in early Universe is con-sidered in subsection 2.1, while in subsection 2.2 the evolution and all possible effects ofU-quarks existence in our Galaxy are discussed. The case of charge asymmetry of quarks of4th generation in Universe is considered in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to the questionsof the search for U-quarks at accelerators. We summarize theresults of our present study,developing earlier investigations [15,16], in Conclusion.

2 Charge symmetric case of U-quarks

2.1 Primordial U-hadrons from Big Bang Universe

Freezing out of U-quarksIn the early Universe at temperatures highly above their masses fermions of 4th genera-tion were in thermodynamical equilibrium with relativistic plasma. When in the course ofexpansion the temperatureT falls down below the mass of the lightestU -quark,m, equi-librium concentration of quark-antiquark pairs of 4th generation is given by

n4 = g4

(

Tm

2π

)3/2

exp (−m/T ), (1)

whereg4 = 6 is the effective number of their spin and colour degrees of freedom. We usethe unitsh = c = k = 1 throughout this paper.

The expansion rate of the Universe at RD-stage is given by theexpression

H =1

2t=

√

4π3gtot45

T 2

mP l≈ 1.66 g

1/2tot

T 2

mP l, (2)

3

where temperature dependence follows from the expression for critical density of the Uni-verse

ρcrit =3H2

8πG= gtot

π2

30T 4.

When it starts to exceed the rate of quark-antiquark annihilation

Rann = n4 〈σv〉 , (3)

in the period, corresponding toT = Tf < m, quarks of 4th generation freeze out, so thattheir concentration does not follow the equilibrium distribution Eq.(1) atT < Tf . For aconvenience we introduce the variable

r4 =n4

s, (4)

where

s =2π2gtot s

45T 3 ≈ 1.80 gtot snγ ≈ 1.80 gmod

tot sη−1nB (5)

is the entropy density of all matter. In Eq.(5)s was expressed through the thermal photonnumber densitynγ = 2ζ(3)

π2 T 3 and also through the baryon number densitynB , for whichat the modern epoch we havenmod

B /nmodγ ≡ η ≈ 6 · 10−10.

Under the condition of entropy conservation in the Universe, the number density of thefrozen out particles can be simply found for any epoch through the corresponding thermalphoton number densitynγ . Factorsgtot andgtot s take into account the contribution of allparticle species and are defined as

gtot =∑

i=bosons

gi

(

Ti

T

)4

+7

8

∑

i=fermions

gi

(

Ti

T

)4

and

gtot s =∑

i=bosons

gi

(

Ti

T

)3

+7

8

∑

i=fermions

gi

(

Ti

T

)3

,

wheregi andTi are the number of spin degrees of freedom and temperature of ultrarela-tivistic bosons or fermions. For epochT ≪ me ≈ 0.5MeV it is assumed that only photonsand neutrinos withTν = (4/11)1/3T give perceptible contribution into energy (until theend of RD-stage) and entropy (until now) densities so one has

gmodtot s ≈ 3.91 gmod

tot ≈ 3.36. (6)

For modern entropy density we havesmod ≈ 2890 cm−3.From the equality of the expressions Eq.(2) and Eq.(3) one gets

m/Tf ≈ 42 + ln(g−1/2tot mpm 〈σv〉)

with mp being the proton mass and obtains, taking〈σv〉 ∼ α2

QCD

m2 and gtot(Tf ) =gtot s(Tf ) = gf ≈ 80− 90,

Tf ≈ m/30

4

and

r4 =Hf

sf 〈σv〉≈ 4

g1/2f mP lTf 〈σv〉

≈ 2.5 · 10−14 m

250GeV. (7)

Index ”f” means everywhere that the corresponding quantityis taken atT = Tf . Note,that the result Eq.(7), obtained in approximation of ”instantaneous” freezing out, coincideswith more accurate one if〈σv〉 andgf can be considered (as in given case) to be constant.Also it is worth to emphasize, that given estimation forr4 relates to only 4th quark or 4thantiquark abundances, assumed in this part to be equal to each other.

Note that ifTf > ∆ = mD − m, wheremD is the mass ofD-quark (assumed to beheavier, thanU -quark) the frozen out concentration of 4th generation quarks represent atTf > T > ∆ a mixture of nearly equal amounts ofUU andDD pairs.

At T < ∆ the equilibrium ratio

D

U∝ exp

(

−∆

T

)

is supported by weak interaction, provided thatβ-transitions(U → D) and(D → U) are inequilibrium. The lifetime ofD-quarks,τ , is also determined by the rate of weak(D → U)transition, and att ≫ τ all the frozen outDD pairs should decay toUU pairs.

At the temperatureTf annihilation of U-quarks to gluons and to pairs of light quarksUU → gg, qq terminates andUU pairs are frozen out. The frozen out concentration isgiven by Eq.(7). Even this value of primordial concentration of U -quarks with the massm = 250 GeV would lead to the contribution into the modern density2mr4smod, whichis by an order of magnitude less than the baryonic density, sothat in the charge symmetriccaseU -quarks can not play a significant dynamical role in the modern Universe.

The actual value of primordialU -particle concentration should be much smaller dueto QCD, hadronic and radiative recombination, which reducethe abundance of frozen outU -particles.y-Interaction can play essential role in successive evolution to be considered.It accounts for radiative recombination and plays crucial role in galactic evolution of U-hadrons. So, it will be included into further considerationwhich will be carried out for bothsub-cases (with and withouty-interaction).

QCD recombinationAt

T ≤ I1 = mα2/4 = 3.2GeVm

250GeV,

whereα = 0.23 accounts for joint effect of Coulomb-like attraction due toQCD andy-interactions, formation of bound(UU) states is possible, in which frozen out Heavy quarksand antiquarks can annihilate. Effect ofy-interaction is not essential here.

Note that atT ≤ I1 rate of(UU) annihilation in bound systems exceeds the rate of”ionization” of these systems by quark gluon plasma. So the rate of QCD recombination,given by [14,15]

〈σv〉 ≈(

16π

35/2

)

· α

T 1/2 ·m3/2U

, (8)

is the rate, with which abundance of frozen outU -quarks decreases.

5

The decrease ofU -hadron abundance owing toUU recombination is governed by theequation

dn4

dt= −3Hn4 − n2

4 · 〈σv〉 . (9)

Using notation Eq.(4) and relation

− dt =dT

HT, (10)

which follows from Eq.(2) and is true as long asgtot ≈ const, Eq.(9) is reduced to

dr4 = r24 · sHT 〈σv〉 dT, (11)

wheresHT =√

πg/45 with g ≡ g2tot s/gtot = (for T > me) = gtot s = gtot.At T0 = I1 > T > TQCD = T1, assuming in this periodg = const = gf ≈ 17, the

solution of Eq.(11) is given by

r4 =r0

1 + r0√

πgf45 mP l

∫ T0

T1〈σv〉 dT

≈ 0.16

(

m

I1

)1/2 m

αmP l≈ (12)

≈ 1.6 · 10−16 m

250GeV.

It turns to be independent on the frozen out concentrationr0 given by Eq.(7).At T < IUU ≤ mα2/4 = 1.6GeV m

250GeV , where effective constantα = CFαs−αy ∼(4/3) · 0.144 − 1/30 = 0.16 accounts for repulsion of the same signy-charges, reactionsU + U → (UU) + g andU + (UU) → (UUU) + g can lead to formation(UU)-diquarkand colorless(UUU) ”hadron” (as well as similarU bound states) in quark gluon plasma[13,14]. However, disruption of these systems by gluons in inverse reactions prevents theireffective formation atT >∼ IUU/30 [14]. Therefore, such systems ofU quarks with massm < 700GeV are not formed before QCD phase transition.

Hadronic recombinationAfter QCD phase transition atT = TQCD ≈ 150MeV quarks of 4th generation combinewith light quarks intoU -hadrons. In baryon asymmetrical Universe only excessive valencequarks should enter such hadrons. Multiple U states formation can start only in processesof hadronic recombination for U-quark massm < 700 GeV what is discussed below.

As it was revealed in [5,6] in the collisions of such mesons and baryons recombinationof U andU into unstable(UU) ”charmonium -like” state can take place, thus successivelyreducing theU -hadron abundance. Hadronic recombination should take place even in theabsence of long rangey-interaction ofU -particles. So, we give first the result without theaccount of radiative recombination induced by this interaction.

There is a large uncertainties in the estimation of hadronicrecombination rate. Themaximal estimation for the reaction rate of recombination〈σv〉 is given by

〈σv〉 ∼ 1

m2π

≈ 6 · 10−16 cm3

s(13)

or by

〈σv〉 ∼ 1

m2ρ

≈ 2 · 10−17 cm3

s. (14)

6

The minimal realistic estimation gives [15]

〈σv〉 ≈ 0.4 · (Teffm3)−1/2(3 + log (TQCD/Teff )), (15)

whereTeff = max T, αymπ.Solution of Eq.(11) for〈σv〉 from the Eq.(13) is given byCase A

r4 =r0

1 + r0 ·√

πgQCD

45mPlmπ

TQCD

mπ

≈ 1.0 · 10−20 (16)

and it is(mρ

mπ)2 ∼ 30 times larger for〈σv〉 from the Eq.(14):

Case Br4 =

r0

1 + r0 ·√

πgQCD

45mPlmρ

TQCD

mρ

≈ 3.0 · 10−19. (17)

For the minimal estimation of recombination rate (15) the solution of Eq.(11) has the form

r4 =r0

1 + r0 · 2 ·√

πgQCD

45mPlm

√

TQCD

m

(18)

where in all the casesr0 is given by Eq.(12) andgQCD ≈ 15. We neglect in our estimationspossible effects of recombination in the intermediate period, when QCD phase transitionproceeds.

The solutions (16) and (17) are independent on the actual initial value ofr4 = r0, ifbefore QCD phase transition it was of the order of (12). For the minimal estimation of therecombination rate (15) the result of hadronic recombination reads

Case C

r4 ≈ 1.2 · 10−16(

m

250GeV

)3/2

. (19)

As we mentioned above, for the smallest allowed mass ofU -quark, diquarks(UU),(U U) and the tripleU (andU ) states(UUU), (U U U) can not form before QCD phase tran-sition. Therefore U-baryonic states(UUu), (UUU) and their antiparticles should originatefrom singleU (andU ) hadron collisions. The rate of their creation shares the same theo-retical uncertainty as in the case of(UU) formation, considered above. Moreover, whilebaryon(UUu) can be formed e.g. in reaction(Uud) + (Uud) → (UUu) + n, having noenergetic threshold, formation of antibaryon(U U u) may be suppressed at smallest valuesof m by the threshold of nucleon production in reaction(Uu)+ (Uu) → (U U u)+ p+π+,which can even exceedUU binding energy. In further consideration we will not specifyU -hadronic content, assuming that(U U U), (U U u) and(Uu) can be present with appre-ciable fraction, while the content of residualU -hadrons is likely to be realized with multipleU-states and with suppressed fraction of single U-states. Nevertheless we can not ignoresingle U-baryonic states(Uud)+ because only reliable inference on their strong suppres-sion would avoid opposing to strong constraint on+1 heavy particles abundance which willbe considered below.

Radiative recombinationRadiativeUU recombination is induced by ”Coulomb-like” attraction ofU andU due to

7

their y-interaction. It can be described in the analogy to the process of free monopole-antimonopole annihilation considered in [17]. Potential energy of Coulomb-like interactionbetweenU andU exceeds their thermal energyT at the distance

d0 =α

T.

In the case ofy-interaction its running constantα = αy ∼ 1/30 [5]. For α ≪ 1, on thecontrary to the case of monopoles [17] withg2/4π ≫ 1, the mean free path of multiplescattering in plasma is given by

λ = (nσ)−1 ∼(

T 3 · α2

Tm

)−1

∼ m

α3T· d0,

beingλ ≫ d0 for all T < m. So the diffusion approximation [17] is not valid for our case.Therefore radiative capture of freeU and U particles should be considered. Accordingto [17], following the classical solution of energy loss dueto radiation, converting infinitemotion to finite, freeU andU particles form bound systems at the impact parameter

a ≈ (T/m)3/10 · d0. (20)

The rate of such binding is then given by

〈σv〉 = πa2v ≈ π · (m/T )9/10 ·(

α

m

)2

≈ (21)

≈ 6 · 10−13(

α

1/30

)2 (300K

T

)9/10 (250GeV

m

)11/10 cm3

s.

The successive evolution of this highly excited atom-like bound system is determinedby the loss of angular momentum owing to y-radiation. The time scale for the fall on thecenter in this bound system, resulting inUU recombination was estimated according toclassical formula in [18]

τ =a3

64π·(

m

α

)2

=α

64π·(

m

T

)21/10

· 1

m(22)

≈ 4 · 10−4(

300K

T

)21/10 ( m

250GeV

)11/10

s.

As it is easily seen from Eq.(30) this time scale ofUU recombinationτ ≪ m/T 2 ≪mP l/T

2 turns to be much less than the cosmological time at which the bound system wasformed.

The above classical description assumesa = αm3/10T 7/10 ≫ 1

αm and is valid atT ≪mα20/7 [14].

Kinetic equation for U-particle abundance with the accountof radiative capture on RDstage is given by Eq.(11).

8

At T < Trr = α20/7y m ≈ 10MeV(m/250GeV)

(

αy

1/30

)20/7the solution for the effect

of radiative recombination is given by

r4 ≈r0

1 + r0

√

20grrπ3

9α2mPl

m

(

Trrm

)1/10≈ r0 (23)

with r0 taken atT = Trr equal tor4 from Eqs.(16),(17) or (19).Owing to more rapid cosmological expansion radiative capture ofU -hadrons in expand-

ing matter on MD stage is less effective, than on RD stage. So the resultr4 ≈ r0 holds onMD stage with even better precision, than on RD stage. Therefore radiative capture doesnot change the estimation ofU -hadron pregalactic abundance, given by Eqs.(16),(17) or(19).

On the galactic stage in the most of astrophysical bodies temperature is much less thanTrr and radiative recombination plays dominant role in the decrease ofU -hadron abundanceinside dense matter bodies.

U-hadrons during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and thereafterOne reminds that to the beginning of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) there can be(Uud)+, (UUu)++, (UUU)++, (Uu)0, (U U U)−−, (U U u)−− states in plasma. We donot specify here possible fractions of each of the U-hadron species (i) in U-hadronic matter,assuming that any of them can be appreciable (ri <∼ r4).

After BBN proceeded, the states(U U U)−−, (U U u)−− are combined with4He++ dueto electromagnetic interaction. The binding energy of the ground state can be estimatedwith reasonable accuracy following Bohr formulas (for point-like particles)

Ib =(ZAZXα)2mA

2≈ 1.5MeV, (24)

whereZX = 2, ZA = 2 andmA ≈ 3.7 GeV are the charges of U-hadron and Helium andthe mass of the latter. Cross section of this recombination is estimated as [19]

〈σv〉 = 28π√2πα3Z4

AZ2

3 exp(4)mA

√mAT

≈ 3.06 · 10−4

mA

√mAT

. (25)

Evolution of abundance of U-hadrons combining withHe is described by equation

dn(U UU)

dt= −3Hn(U U U) − 〈σv〉n(UU U)nHe. (26)

The term corresponding to disintegration of[(U U U)He] is neglected, since the energy ofthermal photons is insufficient to disintegrate[(U U U)He] (the same for[(U U u)He]) inthe ground state in this period. Following procedure Eqs.(9-11), we get

r(U U U) = r(U U U)0 exp

(

−√

πg

45mP l

∫ T0

0rHe 〈σv〉 dT

)

≈, (27)

≈ r(U U U)0 exp(

−0.6 · 1012)

,

9

whererHe ≡ nHe/s = Yp/4 · η · nmodγ /smod ≈ 5.2 · 10−12, g follows from Eq.(6) and

T0 = 100 keV was taken. As one can see, Eq.(27) gives in this case strong exponential sup-pression of free(U U U) (the same for(U U u)), while neutral[(U U U)He] and[(U U u)He]states, being one of the forms ofO-helium [16, 20–26], catalyze additional annihilation offreeU -baryons and formation of primordial heavy elements [27]. New type of nuclear re-actions, catalyzed byO-helium, seem to change qualitatively the results of BBN, however(see Sec. 3 and arguments in [16, 20–27]) it does not lead to immediate contradiction withthe observations.

On the base of existing results of investigation of hyper-nuclei [28], one can expect thatthe isoscalar stateΛ+

U = (Uud)+ can form stable bound state with4He due to nuclear inter-action. The change of abundance of U-hyperonsΛ+

U owing to their nuclear fusion with4Heis described by Eq.(26,27), substituting(U U U) ↔ Λ+

U . Disintegration of[ΛUHe] is alsonegligible, since the period, when BBN is finished, is of interest (T < T0 ≪ I([ΛUHe])).

Cross section for nuclear reaction of question can be represented in conventional pa-rameterization through the so called astrophysical S-factor

σ =S(E)

Eexp

(

−2παZXZA

v

)

, (28)

whereE = µv2/2 with µ being reduced mass of interacting particles andv being theirrelative velocity. The exponent in Eq.(28) expresses penetration factor, suppressing crosssection, which reflects repulsive character of Coulomb force contrary to the case of(U U U).S-factor itself is unknown, being supposedS(E → 0) → const. Averagingσv overMaxwell velocity distribution gives, using saddle point method,

〈σv〉 ≈ 4v0 · S(E(v0))√3T

exp

(

−3µv202T

)

, (29)

wherev0 =(

2παZAZXTµ

)1/3.

Calculation gives that suppression of freeΛ+U on more than 20 orders of magnitude

is reached atS(E) >∼ 2MeV · barn. S-factor for reaction of4He production is typicallydistinguished by high magnitudes from those of other reactions and lies around5−30MeV·barn [29]. However, reactions withγ in final state, which is assumed in our case (ΛU +4He → [ΛUHe] + γ), have as a rule S-factor in104 times smaller. Special conditionsshould be demanded from unknown for sure physics ofΛU -nucleus interaction to providea large suppression ofΛU abundance. Such suppression is needed, as we will see below,toavoid contradiction with data on anomalous hydrogen abundance in terrestrial matter. Theexperimental constraints on anomalous lithium are less restrictive and can be satisfied inthis case.

y-plasmaThe existence of new massless U(1) gauge boson (y-photon) implies the presence of pri-mordial thermaly-photon background in the Universe. Such background shouldbe in equi-librium with ordinary plasma and radiation until the lightest particle bearingy-charge (4thneutrino) freezes out. For the accepted value of 4th neutrino mass (≥ 50GeV) 4th neu-trino freezing out and correspondingly decoupling ofy-photons takes place before the QCDphase transition, when the total number of effective degrees of freedom is sufficiently large

10

to suppress the effects ofy-photon background in the period of Big Bang nucleosynthesis.This background does not interact with nucleons and does notinfluence the BBN reactionsrate (its possible effect in formation and role of[4He(U U U)] ”atom” is discussed in [15]),while the suppression ofy-photon energy density leads to insignificant effect in the speed-ing up cosmological expansion rate in the BBN period. In the framework of the presentconsideration the existence of primordialy-photons does not play any significant role in thesuccessive evolution ofU -hadrons.

Inclusion of stabley-charged 4th neutrinos strongly complicate the picture. Conditionof cancellation of axial anomalies requires relationship between the values ofy-charges of4th generation leptons (N,E) and quarks (U,D) as the following

eyN = eyE = −eyU/3 = −eyD/3.

In course of cosmological combined evolution ofU andN andy, “y-molecules” of kind U-U-U-N, where different U-quarks can belong to different U-hadrons (possibly bound withnucleus) should form. Suchy-neutral molecules can avoid effect of U-hadrons suppressionin the terrestrial matter, relevant in charge symmetric case, and lead to contradiction withobservations, analysis of which is started now. UUU-N-typestates will be considered insection 3 devoted to the charge-asymmetric case.

2.2 Evolution and manifestations of U-hadrons at galactic stage

In the period of recombination of nuclei with electrons the positively chargedU -baryonsrecombine with electrons to form atoms of anomalous isotopes. The substantial (up to10 orders of magnitude) excess of electron number density over the number density ofprimordial U -baryons makes virtually allU -baryons to form atoms. The cosmologicalabundance of free chargedU -baryons is to be exponentially small after recombination.

Hadrons(UUu), (UUU) form atoms of anomalous He atT ∼ 2 eV together with re-combination of ordinary helium. The states[(U U U)He], [(U U u)He], (Uu) escape recom-bination with electrons because of their neutrality; hadrons(Uud), if they are not involvedinto chain of nuclear transitions, form atoms of anomalous hydrogen.

The formed atoms, having atomic cross sections of interaction with matter follow bary-onic matter in formation of astrophysical objects like gas clouds, stars and planets, whengalaxies are formed.

On the contrary, O-helium and(Uu) mesons, having nuclear and hadronic cross sec-tions, respectively, can decouple from plasma and radiation atT ∼ 1 keV and behave inGalaxy as collisionless gas. In charge asymmetric case, considered in the next Section 3,or in charge symmetric case withouty-interaction O-helium and(Uu) mesons behave onthis reason as collisionless gas of dark matter particles. On that reasons one can expectsuppression of their concentration in baryonic matter.

However, in charge symmetric case withy-interaction, the existence of Coulomb-likey-attraction will make them to obey the condition of neutrality in respect to they-charge.Therefore owing to neutrality condition the number densities ofU - andU -hadrons in as-trophysical bodies should be equal. It leads to effects in matter bodies, considered in thissubsection.

11

U-hadrons in galactic matterIn the astrophysical body with atomic number densityna the initial U -hadron abundancenU0 = fa0 · na can decrease with time due toUU recombination. Here and in estimationsthereafter we will refer to U-quark abundance as U-hadron one (as if all U-hadrons werecomposed of single U-quarks), if it is not specified otherwise.

Under the neutrality conditionnU = nU

the relativeU -hadron abundancefa0 = nU/na = nU/na is governed by the equation

dfadt

= −f2a · na · 〈σv〉 . (30)

Here〈σv〉 is defined by Eq.(21). The solution of this equation is given by

fa =fa0

1 + fa0 · na · 〈σv〉 · t. (31)

If

na · 〈σv〉 · t ≫1

fa0, (32)

the solution (31) takes the form

fa =1

na · 〈σv〉 · t. (33)

and, being independent on the initial value,U -hadron abundance decreases inversely pro-portional to time.

By definition fa0 = f0/Aatom, whereAatom is the averaged atomic weight of theconsidered matter andf0 is the initialU -hadron to baryon ratio. In the pregalactic matterthis ratio is determined byr4 from A) Eq.(16), B) Eq.(17) and C) Eq.(19) and is equal to

f =r4rb

=

10−10 for the caseA,3 · 10−9 for the caseB,1.2 · 10−6 for the caseC.

(34)

Hererb ≈ 10−10 is baryon to entropy ratio.Taking for averaged atomic number density in the Earthna ≈ 1023 cm−3, one finds that

during the age of the Solar system primordialU -hadron abundance in the terrestrial mattershould have been reduced down tofa ≈ 10−28. One should expect similar reduction ofU -hadron concentration in Sun and all the other old sufficiently dense astrophysical bodies.Therefore in our own body we might contain just one of such heavy hadrons. However, asshown later on, the persistent pollution from the galactic gas nevertheless may increase thisrelic number density to much larger value (fa ≈ 10−23).

The principal possibility of strong reduction in dense bodies for primordial abundanceof exotic charge symmetric particles due to their recombination in unstable charmoniumlike systems was first revealed in [30] for fractionally charged colorless composite particles(fractons).

12

TheU -hadron abundance in the interstellar gas strongly dependson the matter evolutionin Galaxy, which is still not known to the extent, we need for our discussion.

Indeed, in the opposite case of low density or of short time interval, when the condition(32) is not valid, namely, at

na <1

fa0 〈σv〉 t= Aatom · T

300K· tUtcm−3

4 · 104 for the caseA,103 for the caseB,1.2 for the caseC,

(35)

wheretU = 4 · 1017 s is the age of the Universe,U -hadron abundance does not change itsinitial value.

In principle, if in the course of evolution matter in the forming Galaxy was presentduring sufficiently long period (t ∼ 109 yrs) within cold (T ∼ 10 K) clouds with densityna ∼ 103 cm−3 U -hadron abundance retains its primordial value for the cases A and B(f0 = f ), but falls downf0 = 5 · 10−9 in the case C, making this case close to the case B.The above argument may not imply all theU -hadrons to be initially present in cold clouds.They can pass through cold clouds and decrease their abundance in the case C at the stage ofthermal instability, when cooling gas clouds, before they become gravitationally bound, arebound by the external pressure of the hot gas. Owing to their large inertia heavyU -hadronatoms from the hot gas can penetrate much deeply inside the cloud and can be capturedby it much more effectively, than ordinary atoms. Such mechanism can provide additionalsupport for reduction ofU -hadron abundance in the case C. The reduction of this abundancedown to values, corresponding to the case A can be also provided byO-helium catalysis inthe period of BBN.

However, in particular, annihilation ofU -hadrons leads to multipleγ production. IfU -hadrons with relative abundancef annihilate at the redshiftz, it should leave in the modernUniverse a backgroundγ flux [15]

F (E > Eγ) =Nγ · f · rb · smod · c

4π≈ 3 · 103f (cm2 · s · ster)−1,

of γ quanta with energiesE > Eγ = 10GeV/(1 + z). The numerical values forγ multi-plicity Nγ are given in table 1 [15].

Energy fraction > 0 > 0.1 GeV > 1 GeV > 10 GeV > 100 GeVNγ 69 62 28 2.4 0.001

Table 1: Multiplicities ofγ produced in the recombination of(QQ) pair with m = 250GeV for different energy intervals.

So annihilation even as early as atz ∼ 9 leads in the case C to the contribution intodiffuse extragalactic gamma emission, exceeding the flux, measured by EGRET by threeorders of magnitude. The latter can be approximated as

F (E > Eγ) ≈ 3 · 10−6

(

E0

Eγ

)1.1

(cm2 · s · ster)−1,

whereE0 = 451MeV.

13

The above upper bound strongly restricts (f ≤ 10−9) the earliest abundance becauseof the consequent impossibility to reduce the primordialU -hadron abundance byU -hadronannihilation in low density objects. In the cases A and B annihilation in such objects shouldnot take place, whereas annihilation within the dense objects, being opaque forγ radiation,can avoid this constraint due to strong suppression of outgoing γ flux. However, such con-straint nevertheless should arise for the period of dense objects’ formation. For example, inthe course of protostellar collapse hydrodynamical timescaletH ∼ 1/

√πGρ ∼ 1015 s/

√n

exceeds the annihilation timescale [15]

tan ∼ 1

fn 〈σv〉 ∼ 1012 s

fn

(

1/30

α

)2 ( T

300K

)9/10 ( m

250GeV

)11/10

at n > 1014(

10−10

f

)2 (1/30α

)4 (T

300K

)9/5 ( m250GeV

)11/5, wheren is in cm−3. We consider

homogeneous cloud with massM has radiusR ≈ 1019 cmn1/3

(

MM⊙

)1/3, whereM⊙ = 2 · 1033

g is the Solar mass. It becomes opaque forγ radiation, when this radius exceeds the mean

free pathlγ ∼ 1026 cm/n atn > 3 · 1010 cm−3(

MM⊙

)1/2. As a result, forf as large as in

the case C, rapid annihilation takes place when the collapsing matter is transparent forγradiation and the EGRET constraint can not be avoided. The cases A and B are consistentwith this constraint.

Note that atf < 5 · 10−6(

MM⊙

)2/9, i.e. for all the considered cases energy release from

U -hadron annihilation does not exceed the gravitational binding energy of the collapsingbody. Therefore,U -hadron annihilation can not prevent the formation of denseobjects butit can provide additional energy source, e.g. at early stages of evolution of first stars. Itsburning is quite fast (few years) and its luminosity may be quite extreme, leading to a shortinhibition of star formation [15]. Similar effects of dark matter annihilation were recentlyconsidered in [31].

Galactic blowing of U -baryon atoms polluting our EarthSince the condition Eq.(35) is valid for the disc interstellar gas, having the number densityng ∼ 1 cm−3 one can expect that theU -hadron abundance in it can decrease relative tothe primordial value only due to enrichment of this gas by thematter, which has passedthrough stars and had the suppressedU -hadron abundance according to Eq.(33). Taking thefactor of such decrease of the order of the ratio of total masses of gas and stars in Galaxyfg ∼ 10−2 and accounting for the acceleration of the interstellar gasby Solar gravitationalforce, so that the infalling gas has velocityvg ≈ 4.2 · 106cm/s in vicinity of Earth’s orbit,one obtains that the flux ofU -hadrons coming with interstellar gas should be of the orderof [15]

IU =ffgngvg

8π≈ 1.5 · 10−7 f

10−10(sm2 · s · ster)−1

, (36)

wheref is given by the Eq.(34).Presence of primordialU -hadrons in the Universe should be reflected by their existence

in Earth’s atmosphere and ground. However, according to Eq.(33) (see discussion in Sec-tion 2.2) primordial terrestrialU -hadron content should strongly decrease due to radiativerecombination, so that theU -hadron abundance in Earth is determined by the kinetic equi-librium between the incomingU -hadron flux and the rate of decrease of this abundance bydifferent mechanisms.

14

In the successive analysis we’ll concentrate our attentionon the case, when theUbaryon has charge+2, andU -hadrons are electrically neutral. In this caseU baryons looklike superheavy anomalous helium isotopes.

Searches for anomalous helium were performed in series of experiments based on ac-celerator search [32], spectrometry technique [33] and laser spectroscopy [34]. From theexperimental point of view an anomalous helium represents afavorable case, since it re-mains in the atmosphere whereas a normal helium is severely depleted in the terrestrialenvironment due to its light mass.

The best upper limits on the anomalous helium were obtain in [34]. It was found bysearching for a heavy helium isotope in the Earth’s atmosphere that in the mass range 5 GeV– 10000 GeV the terrestrial abundance (the ratio of anomalous helium number to the totalnumber of atoms in the Earth) of anomalous helium is less than(2−3)·10−19. The search inthe atmosphere is reasonable because heavy gases are well mixed up to 80 km and becausethe heavy helium does not sink due to gravity deeply in the Earth and is homogeneouslyredistributed in the volume of the World Ocean at the timescale of 103 yr.

The kinetic equations, describing evolution of anomalous helium andU -hadrons inmatter have the form [15]

dnU

dt= jU − nU · nU · 〈σv〉 − jgU (37)

for U -hadron number densityn and

dnU

dt= jU − nU · nU · 〈σv〉 − jgU (38)

for number density of anomalous heliumnU . HerejU andjU take into account the incomeof, correspondingly,U -baryons andU-hadrons to considered region, the second terms onthe right-hand-side of equations describeUU recombination and the termsjgU and jgUdetermine various mechanisms for outgoing fluxes, e.g. gravitationally driven sink of par-ticles. The latter effect is much stronger forU -hadrons due to much lower mobility ofU -baryon atoms. However, long range Coulomb like interaction prevents them from sink-ing, provided that its force exceeds the Earth’s gravitational force.

In order to compare these forces let’s consider the World’s Ocean as a thin shell ofthicknessL ≈ 4 · 105 cm with homogeneously distributedy charge, determined by distri-bution ofU -baryon atoms with concentrationn. They-field outside this shell according toGauss’ law is determined by

2EyS = 4πeynSL,

being equal toEy = 2πeynL.

In the resulty force, exerting onU -hadrons

Fy = eyEy,

exceeds gravitational force forU -baryon atom concentration

n > 10−7 m

250GeV

30−1

αycm−3. (39)

15

Note that the mobility ofU -baryon atoms andU hadrons differs by 10 order of mag-nitude, what can lead to appearance of excessivey-charges within the limits of (39). Onecan expect that such excessive charges arise due to the effective slowing down ofU -baryonatoms in high altitude levels of Earth’s atmosphere, which are transparent forU hadrons, aswell as due to the 3 order of magnitude decrease ofU hadrons when they enter the Earth’ssurface.

Under the condition of neutrality, which is strongly protected by Coulomb-likey-interaction, all the corresponding parameters forU -hadrons andU -baryons in the Eqs.(37)-(38) are equal, if Eq.(39) is valid. Provided that the timescale of mass exchange betweenthe Ocean and atmosphere is much less than the timescale of sinking, sink terms can beneglected.

The stationary solution of Eqs.(37)-(38) gives in this case

n =

√

j

〈σv〉 , (40)

where

jU = jU = j ∼ 2πIUL

= 10−12 f

10−10cm−3s−1 (41)

and〈σv〉 is given by the Eq.(21). Forj ≤ 10−12 f10−10 cm

−3s−1 and〈σv〉 given by Eq.(21)one obtains in water

n ≤√

f

10−10cm−3.

It corresponds to terrestrialU -baryon abundance

fa ≤ 10−23

√

f

10−10,

being below the above mentioned experimental upper limits for anomalous helium (fa <10−19) even for the case C withf = 2 · 10−6. In air one has

n ≤ 10−3

√

f

10−10cm−3.

For example in a cubic room of 3m size there are nearly 27 thousand heavy hadrons.Note that putting formally in the Eq.(40) the value of〈σv〉 given by the Eq.(13) one

obtainsn ≤ 6 · 102 cm−3 andfa ≤ 6 · 10−20, being still below the experimental upperlimits for anomalous helium abundance. So the qualitative conclusion that recombinationin dense matter can provide the sufficient decrease of this abundance avoiding the con-tradiction with the experimental constraints could be valid even in the absence of gaugey-charge and Coulomb-likey-field interaction forU -hadrons. It looks like the hadronicrecombination alone can be sufficiently effective in such decrease. However, if we take thevalue of 〈σv〉 given by the Eq.(14) one obtainsn by the factor ofmρ

mπ∼ 5.5 larger and

fa ≤ 3.3 · 10−19, what exceeds the experimental upper limits for anomalous helium abun-dance. Moreover, in the absence ofy-attraction there is no dynamical mechanism, makingthe number densities ofU -baryons andU -hadrons equal each other with high accuracy. So

16

0.5 1 2 5 10 20U-quark mass, TeV

10-10

10-8

10-6

10-4

10-2in

itial

U-

hadr

onto

bary

onra

tio,f

0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20

10-12

10-10

10-8

10-6

10-4

10-2

A

B

C

anomalous He

EGRET

Figure 1: Upper constraints on relative abundances of U-hadrons (f ) following from thesearch for anomalous helium in the Earth, from EGRET, constraining possible annihilationeffect on pregalactic stage, in comparison with predictionf in three cases (A,B,C).

nothing seems to prevent in this case selecting and segregatingU -baryons fromU -hadrons.Such segregation, being highly probable due to the large difference in the mobility ofU -baryon atoms andU hadrons can lead to uncompensated excess of anomalous helium in theEarth, coming into contradiction with the experimental constraints.

Similar result can be obtained for any planet, having atmosphere and Ocean, in whicheffective mass exchange between atmosphere and Ocean takesplace. There is no suchmass exchange in planets without atmosphere and Ocean (e.g.in Moon) andU -hadronabundance in such planets is determined by the interplay of effects of incoming interstellargas,UU recombination and slow sinking ofU -hadrons to the centers of planets.

Radiative recombination here considered is not able to savethe case when free singlepositively charged U-hadrons(Uud) are present with noticeable fraction among U-hadronicrelics. It is the very strong constraint on anomalous hydrogen (fa < 10−30) [35] what ishardly avoidable. So, the model with free stable+1 charged relics which are not bound innuclear systems with charge≥ +2 can be discarded.

To conclude this section we present the obtained constraints on the Fig.(1).Cosmic rays experiments

In addition to the possible traces of U-hadrons existence inthe Earth, they can be manifestedin cosmic rays.

According to the arguments in previous sectionU -baryon abundance in the primarycosmic rays can be close to the primordial valuef . It gives for case B

f =r4rb

∼ 3 · 10−9. (42)

If U -baryons have mostly the form(UUU), its fraction in cosmic ray helium componentcan reach in this case the value

(UUU)4He

∼ 3 · 10−8,

17

1

Figure 2: Lines show the region of expected signal, their thickness reflects expected ac-curicy in experiment PAMELA. Upper thick curves relate to anomalous helium of 500 and750 GeV (a little upper and darker). The low thin curves relate to usual nuclei.

which is accessible for cosmic rays experiments, such as RIM-PAMELA, being under run,and AMS 02 on International Space Station.

Similar argument in the case C would give for this fraction∼ 2 · 10−5, what may bealready excluded by the existing data. However, it should benoted that the above estimationassumes significant contribution of particles from interstellar matter to cosmic rays. Ifcosmic ray particles are dominantly originated from the purely stellar matter, the decreaseof U -hadron abundance in stars would substantially reduce the primaryU -baryon fractionof cosmic rays. But in cosmic rays there are many different kind of particles. In order todiffer U-hadrons from background events we can use the dependence of rigidity on velocitygiven on Fig.2.

The expected signal will strongly differ from background events in terms of relation be-tween velocity and rigidity (momentum related to the charge). In the experiment PAMELAvelocity is measured with a good accuracy, what can lead to the picture Fig.2.

Correlation between cosmic ray and large volume underground detectors’ effectsInside large volume underground detectors (as Super Kamiokande) and in their vicinityU -hadron recombination should cause specific events (”spherical” energy release with zerototal momentum or ”wide cone” energy release with small total momentum), which couldbe clearly distinguished from the (energy release with hightotal momentum within ”nar-row cone”) effects of common atmospheric neutrino - nucleon-lepton chain (as well as ofhypothetical WIMP annihilation in Sun and Earth) [15].

The absence of such events inside 22 kilotons of water in Super Kamiokande (SK)detector during 5 years of its operation would give the most severe constraint

n < 10−3 cm−3,

corresponding tofa < 10−26. For the considered type of anomalous helium such constraint

18

would be by 7 order of magnitude stronger, than the results ofpresent direct searches and 3orders above our estimation in previous Section.

However, this constraint assumes that distilled water in SKdoes still contain pollutedheavy hadrons (as it may be untrue). Nevertheless even for pure water it may not be the casefor the detector’s container and its vicinity. The conservative limit follows from the condi-tion that the rate ofU -hadron recombination in the body of detector does not exceed the rateof processes, induced by atmospheric muons and neutrinos. The presence of clustered-likemuons originated on the SK walls would be probably observed.

High sensitivity of large volume detectors to the effects ofU -hadron recombinationtogether with the expected increase of volumes of such detectors up to 1 km3 offer the pos-sibility of correlated search for cosmic rayU -hadrons and for effects of their recombination.

During one year of operation a 1 km3 detector could be sensitive to effects of recombi-nation at theU -hadron number densityn ≈ 7 · 10−6 cm−3 andfa ≈ 7 · 10−29, coveringthe whole possible range of these parameters, since this level of sensitivity correspondsto the residual concentration of primordialU -hadrons, which can survive inside the Earth.The income of cosmicU -hadrons and equilibrium between this income and recombinationshould lead to increase of effect, expected in large volume detectors.

Even, if the income of anomalous helium with interstellar gas is completely suppressed,pollution of Earth byU -hadrons from primary cosmic rays is possible. The minimal effectof pollution byU -hadron primary cosmic rays fluxIU corresponds to the rate of increaseof U -hadron number densityj ∼ 2πIU

RE, whereRE ≈ 6 · 108 cm is the Earth’s radius. If

incoming cosmic rays doubly chargedU -baryons after their slowing down in matter recom-bine with electrons we should take instead ofRE the Ocean’s thicknessL ≈ 4 ·105 cm thatincreases by 3 orders of magnitude the minimal flux and the minimal number of events, es-timated below. Equilibrium between this income rate and therate of recombination shouldlead toN ∼ jV t events of recombination inside the detector with volumeV during itsoperation timet.

For the minimal flux of cosmic rayU -hadrons, accessible to AMS 02 experiment during3 years of its operation (Imin ∼ 10−9Iα ∼ 4 · 10−11I(E), in the range of energy pernucleon1 < E < 10GeV) the minimal number of events expected in detector of volumeV during timet is given byNmin ∼ 2πImin

REV t. It gives about 3 events per 10 years in

SuperKamiokande (V = 2.2 · 1010 cm3) and about104 events in the 1 km3 detector duringone year of its operation. The noise of this rate is one order and half below the expectedinfluence of atmosphericνµ.

The possibility of such correlation facilitates the searchfor anomalous helium in cosmicrays and for the effects ofU -hadron recombination in the large volume detectors.

The previous discussion assumed the lifetime ofU -quarksτ exceeding the age of theUniversetU . In the opposite caseτ < tU all the primordialU hadrons should decay to thepresent time and the cosmic ray interaction may be the only source of cosmic and terrestrialU hadrons.

19

3 The case of a charge-asymmetry of U-quarks

The model [15] admits that in the early Universe an antibaryon asymmetry for 4th genera-tion quarks can be generated [16,20,21]. Due toy-charge conservationU excess should becompensated byN excess. We will focus our attention here to the case ofy-charged quarksand neutrinos of 4th generation and follow [16] in our discussion. All the main resultsconcerning observational effects, presented here, can be generalized for the case withouty-interaction.

U -antibaryon density can be expressed through the modern dark matter densityΩU =k · ΩCDM = 0.224 (k ≤ 1), saturating it atk = 1. It is convenient to relate the baryon(corresponding toΩb = 0.044) andU (N ) excess with the entropy densitys, introducingrb = nb/s and rU = nU/s = 3 · nN/s = 3 · rN . One obtainsrb ∼ 8 · 10−11 andrU , corresponding toU excess in the early UniverseκU = rU − rU = 3 · (rN − rN ) =10−12(350GeV/mU ) = 10−12/S5, whereS5 = mU/350GeV.

Primordial composite forms of 4th generation dark matterIn the early Universe at temperatures highly above their massesU andN were in thermo-dynamical equilibrium with relativistic plasma. It means that atT > mU (T > mN ) theexcessiveU (N ) were accompanied byUU (NN ) pairs.

Due toU excess frozen out concentration of deficitU -quarks is suppressed atT < mU

for k > 0.04 [21]. It decreases further exponentially first atT ∼ IU ≈ α2MU/2 ∼3S5GeV (where [15]α = CFαc = 4/3 · 0.144 ≈ 0.19 andMU = mU/2 is the reducedmass), when the frozen outU quarks begin to bind with antiquarksU into charmonium-likestate(UU) and annihilate. On this lineU excess binds atT < IU by chromo-Coulombforces dominantly into(U U U) anutium states with electric chargeZ∆ = −2 and massmo = 1.05S5TeV, while remaining freeU anti-quarks and anti-diquarks(U U) form afterQCD phase transition normal size hadrons(Uu) and (U U u). Then atT = TQCD ≈150MeV additional suppression of remainingU -quark hadrons takes place in their hadroniccollisions with U -hadrons, in which(UU) states are formed andU -quarks successivelyannihilate.

Effect of N excess in the suppression of deficit N takes place atT < mN for k > 0.02[21]. At T ∼ INN = α2

yMN/4 ∼ 15MeV (for αy = 1/30 andMN = 50GeV) due toy-interaction the frozen outN begin to bind withN into charmonium-like states(NN) andannihilate. AtT < INU = α2

yMN/2 ∼ 30MeV y-interaction causes binding ofN withU -hadrons (dominantly with anutium) but only atT ∼ INU/30 ∼ 1MeV this binding isnot prevented by back reaction ofy-photo-destruction.

To the period of Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (SBBN)U are dominantly boundin anutium∆−−

3Uwith small fraction (∼ 10−6) of neutral(Uu) and doubly charged(U U u)

hadron states. The dominant fraction of anutium is bound byy-interaction withN in(N∆−−

3U) ”atomic” state. Owing to early decoupling ofy-photons from relativistic plasma

presence ofy-radiation background does not influence SBBN processes [15,16,20].At T < Io = Z2Z2

Heα2mHe/2 ≈ 1.6MeV the reaction∆−−

3U+4 He → γ +

(4He++∆−−

3U) might take place, but it can go only after4He is formed in SBBN at

T < 100keV and is effective only atT ≤ TrHe ∼ Io/ log (nγ/nHe) ≈ Io/27 ≈ 60keV,when the inverse reaction of photo-destruction cannot prevent it [14, 20, 22, 36]. In thisperiod anutium is dominantly bound withN . SincerHe = 0.1rb ≫ r∆ = rU/3, in this

20

reaction all free negatively charged particles are bound with helium [14, 20, 22, 36] andneutral Anti-Neutrino-O-helium (ANO-helium,ANOHe) (4He++[N∆−−

3U]) “molecule”

is produced with massmOHe ≈ mo ≈ 1S5TeV. The size of this “molecule” isRo ∼1/(Z∆ZHeαmHe) ≈ 2 · 10−13 cm and it can play the role of a dark matter component anda nontrivial catalyzing role in nuclear transformations.

In nuclear processes ANO-helium looks like anα particle with shielded electric charge.It can closely approach nuclei due to the absence of a Coulombbarrier and opens the wayto form heavy nuclei in SBBN. This path of nuclear transformations involves the fractionof baryons not exceeding10−7 [20] and it can not be excluded by observations.

ANO-helium catalyzed processesAs soon as ANO-helium is formed, it catalyzes annihilation of deficit U -hadrons andN .ChargedU -hadrons penetrate neutral ANO-helium, expel4He, bind with anutium and anni-hilate falling down the center of this bound system. The rateof this reaction is〈σv〉 = πR2

o

and anU excessk = 10−3 is sufficient to reduce the primordial abundance of(Uud) belowthe experimental upper limits.N capture rate is determined by the size of(N∆) ”atom” inANO-helium and its annihilation is less effective.

The size of ANO-helium is of the order of the size of4He and for a nucleus A withelectric chargeZ > 2 the size of the Bohr orbit for a(Z∆) ion is less than the size of nu-cleus A. This means that while binding with a heavy nucleus∆ penetrates it and effectivelyinteracts with a part of the nucleus with a size less than the corresponding Bohr orbit. Thissize corresponds to the size of4He, making O-helium the most bound(Z∆)-atomic state.

The cross section for∆ interaction with hadrons is suppressed by factor∼ (ph/p∆)2 ∼

(r∆/rh)2 ≈ 10−4/S2

5 , whereph andp∆ are quark transverse momenta in normal hadronsand in anutium, respectively. Therefore anutium componentof (ANOHe) can hardly becaptured and bound with nucleus due to strong interaction. However, interaction of the4He component of(ANOHe) with aA

ZQ nucleus can lead to a nuclear transformation dueto the reactionAZQ + (∆He) →A+4

Z+2 Q + ∆, provided that the masses of the initial andfinal nuclei satisfy the energy conditionM(A,Z) + M(4, 2) − Io > M(A + 4, Z + 2),whereIo = 1.6MeV is the binding energy of O-helium andM(4, 2) is the mass of the4Henucleus. The final nucleus is formed in the excited[α,M(A,Z)] state, which can rapidlyexperienceα- decay, giving rise to(ANOHe) regeneration and to effective quasi-elasticprocess of(ANOHe)-nucleus scattering. It leads to possible suppression of ANO-heliumcatalysis of nuclear transformations in matter.

ANO-helium dark matterAt T < Tod ≈ 1 keV energy and momentum transfer from baryons to ANO-heliumnb 〈σv〉 (mp/mo)t < 1 is not effective. Hereσ ≈ σo ∼ πR2

o ≈ 10−25 cm2. and

v =√

2T/mp is baryon thermal velocity. Then ANO-helium gas decouples from plasmaand radiation and plays the role of dark matter, which startsto dominate in the Universe atTRM = 1eV.

The composite nature of ANO-helium makes it more close to warm dark matter. Thetotal mass of(OHe) within the cosmological horizon in the period of decouplingis inde-pendent ofS5 and given by

Mod =TRM

TodmP l(

mP l

Tod)2 ≈ 2 · 1042 g = 109M⊙.

21

O-helium is formed only atTo = 60keV and the total mass ofOHe within cosmologicalhorizon in the period of its creation isMo = Mod(To/Tod)

3 = 1037 g. Though afterdecoupling Jeans mass in(OHe) gas falls downMJ ∼ 3 · 10−14Mod one should expectstrong suppression of fluctuations on scalesM < Mo as well as adiabatic damping of soundwaves in RD plasma for scalesMo < M < Mod. It provides suppression of small scalestructure in the considered model. This dark matter plays dominant role in formation oflarge scale structure atk > 1/2.

The first evident consequence of the proposed scenario is theinevitable presence ofANO-helium in terrestrial matter, which is opaque for(ANOHe) and stores all its in-falling flux. If its interaction with matter is dominantly quasi-elastic, this flux sinks downthe center of Earth. If ANO-helium regeneration is not effective and∆ remains bound withheavy nucleusZ, anomalous isotope ofZ − 2 element appears. This is the serious problemfor the considered model.

Even atk = 1 ANO-helium gives rise to less than 0.1 [20,21] of expected backgroundevents in XQC experiment [37], thus avoiding for allk ≤ 1 severe constraints on StronglyInteracting Massive particles SIMPs obtained in [3] from the results of this experiment.In underground detectors(ANOHe) “molecules” are slowed down to thermal energiesfar below the threshold for direct dark matter detection. However,(ANOHe) destructioncan result in observable effects. Therefore a special strategy in search for this form ofdark matter is needed. An interesting possibility offers development of superfluid3Hedetector [38]. Due to high sensitivity to energy release above (Eth = 1keV), operation ofits actual few gram prototype can put severe constraints on awide range ofk andS5.

At 10−3 < k < 0.02 U -baryon abundance is strongly suppressed [16, 21], while themodest suppression of primordialN abundance does not exclude explanation of DAMA,HEAT and EGRET data in the framework of hypothesis of 4th neutrinos but makes theeffect ofN annihilation in Earth consistent with the experimental data.

4 Signatures for U -hadrons in accelerator experiments

MetastableU -quark within a wide range of expected mass can be searched onLHC andTavatron. In spite on that its mass can be quite close to that of t-quark, strategy of theirsearch should be completely different.U -quark in framework of considered model ismetastable and will form metastable hadrons at acceleratorcontrary tot-quark.

Detailed analysis of possibility of U-quark search requires quite deep understandingof physics of interaction between metastable U-hadrons andnucleons of matter. However,strategy of U-quark search can be described in general outline, by knowing mass spectrumof U-hadrons, (differential) cross sections of their production. LHC certainly will provide abetter possibility for U-quark search than Tevatron. Crosssection of U-quark production inpp-collisions at the center mass energy 14 TeV is presented on the Fig. 3. For comparison,cross sections of 4th generation leptons are shown too. Cross sections of U- and D- quarksdoes not virtually differ.

Heavy metastable quarks will be produced with high transverse momentumpT , velocityless than speed of light. In general, simultaneous measurement of velocity and momentumenables to find the mass of particle. Information on ionization losses is, as a rule, not sogood thereto. All these features are typical for any heavy particle, while there can be subtle

22

50 100 200 500 1000 2000mass, GeV

0.1

1

10

100

103

104

cros

sse

ctio

n,fb

50 100 200 500 1000 2000

0.1

1

10

100

103

104N

E

U-,D-quark

Figure 3: Cross sections of production of 4th generation particles (N, E, U, D) at LHC.Horizontal dashed line shows approximate level of sensitivity to be reached after first yearof LHC operation.

differences in the shapes of its angle-,pT -distributions, defined by concrete model which itpredicts.

It is peculiarities of long-lived hadronic nature what can be of special importance forclean selection of events of U-quarks creation. U-quark canform a whole class of U-hadronic states which can be perceived as stable in condition of experiment contrary to theirrelics in Universe. However, as we pointed out, double, triple U-hadronic states cannot bevirtually created in collider. Many other hadronic states whose lifetime is>∼ 10−7 s shouldlook like stable. In the Table 2 expected mass spectrum of U-hadrons, obtained with thehelp of code Pythia [39], is presented.

The lower indexes in notation of U-hadrons in the Table 2 mean(iso)spin (I) of the lightquark pair. From comparison of masses of different U-hadrons it follows that allI = 1 U-hadrons decay quickly emittingπ-meson orγ-quantum, except(Uss)-state. In the rightcolumn the expected relative yields are present. UnstableI = 1 U-hadrons decay ontorespectiveI = 0 states, increasing their yields.

Firstly one makes a few notes. There are two mesonic states being quasi-degeneratedin mass:(Uu) and (Ud) (we skip here discussion of strange U-hadrons). In interactionwith medium composed ofu andd quarks transformations of U-hadrons into those onescontainingu andd are preferable (as it is the case in early Universe). From these it follows,that created pair ofU U quarks will fly out from the vertex of pp-collision in form of U-hadron with positive charge in about 60% of such events and with neutral charge in 40% andin form of anti-U-hadron with negative charge in 60% and neutral in 40%. After travelingthrough detectors a few nuclear lengths from vertex, U-hadron will transform in (roughly)100% to positively charged hadron(Uud) whereas anti-U-hadron will transform in 50% to

23

Table 2: Mass spectrum and relative yields in LHC for U-hadrons. The same is for chargedconjugated states.

Difference between themasses of U-hadronand U-quark, GeV

Expected yields (in the rightcolumns the yields of long-livedstates are given)

Uu0 ,

Ud+ 0.330 39.5(3)%, 39.7(3)%

Us+ 0.500 11.6(2)%Uud+ 0.579 5.3(1)% 7.7(1)%Uuu++

1 , Uud+1 ,Udd01

0.771 0.76(4)%,0.86(5)%,0.79(4)%

Usu+ , Usd0 0.805 0.65(4)%,0.65(4)%

1.51(6)%

Usu+1 , Usd01 0.930 0.09(2)%,0.12(2)%

Uss0(1) 1.098 0.005(4)%

negatively charged U-hadron(Ud) and in 50% to neutral U-hadron(Uu).This feature will enable to discriminate the considered model of U-quarks from variety

of alternative models, predicting new heavy stable particles.Note that if the mass of Higgs boson exceeds2m, its decay channel into the pair of

stableQQ will dominate over thett, 2W , 2Z and invisible channel to neutrino pair of 4thgeneration [40]. It may be important for the strategy of heavy Higgs searches.

5 Conclusion

To conclude, the existence of hidden stable or metastable quark of 4th generation can becompatible with the severe experimental constraints on theabundance of anomalous iso-topes in Earths atmosphere and ground and in cosmic rays, even if the lifetime of suchquark exceeds the age of the Universe. Though the primordialabundancef = r4/rb ofhadrons, containing such quark (and antiquark) can be hardly less thanf ∼ 10−10 in caseof charge symmetry, their primordial content can strongly decrease in dense astrophysi-cal objects (in the Earth, in particular) owing to the process of recombination, in whichhadron, containing quark, and hadron, containing antiquark, produce unstable charmonium-like quark-antiquark state.

To make such decrease effective, the equal number density ofquark- and antiquark-containing hadrons should be preserved. It appeals to a dynamical mechanism, preventingsegregation of quark- and antiquark- containing hadrons. Such mechanism, simultaneouslyproviding strict charge symmetry of quarks and antiquarks,naturally arises, if the 4th gen-eration possesses new strictly conserved U(1) gauge (y-) charge. Coulomb-likey-chargelong range force between quarks and antiquarks naturally preserves equal number densitiesfor corresponding hadrons and dynamically supports the condition of y-charge neutrality.

It was shown in the present paper that ifU -quark is the lightest quark of the 4th genera-

24

tion, and the lightest freeU -hadrons are doubly charged(UUU)- and(UUu)-baryons andelectrically neutral(Uu)-meson, the predicted abundance of anomalous helium in Earthsatmosphere and ground as well as in cosmic rays is below the existing experimental con-straints but can be within the reach for the experimental search in future. To realize thispossibility nuclear binding of all the(Uud)-baryons with primordial helium is needed, con-verting potentially dangerous form of anomalous hydrogen into less dangerous anomalouslithium. Then the whole cosmic astrophysics and present history of these relics are puzzlingand surprising, but nearly escaping all present bounds.

Searches for anomalous isotopes in cosmic rays and at accelerators were performedduring last years. Stable doubly chargedU baryons offer challenge for cosmic ray andaccelerator experimental search as well as for increase of sensitivity in searches for anoma-lous helium. In particular, they seem to be of evident interest for cosmic ray experiments,such as PAMELA and AMS02.+2 chargedU baryons represent the lowZ/A anomaloushelium component of cosmic rays, whereas−2 chargedU baryons look like anomalousantihelium nuclei. In the baryon asymmetrical Universe thepredicted amount of primor-dial single(U ud) baryons is exponentially small, whereas their secondary fluxes originatedfrom cosmic ray interaction with the galactic matter are predicted at the level, few order ofmagnitude below the expected sensitivity of future cosmic ray experiments. The same istrue for cosmic ray+2 chargedU baryons, ifU -quark lifetime is less than the age of theUniverse and primordialU baryons do not survive to the present time.

The models of quark interactions favor isoscalar(Uud) baryon to be the lightest amongthe 4th generation baryons (provided thatU quark is lighter, thanD quark, what also maynot be the case). If the lightestU -hadrons have electric charge+1 and survive to the presenttime, their abundance in Earth would exceed the experimental constraint on anomaloushydrogen. This may be rather general case for the lightest hadrons of the 4th generation.To avoid this problem of anomalous hydrogen overproductionthe lightest quark of the 4thgeneration should have the lifetime, less than the age of theUniverse. Another possiblesolution of this problem, using double and tripleU baryons(U U U) and catalysis of(Uud)annihilation in atom-like bound systems4He(U U U) is considered in [15].

However short-living are these quarks on the cosmological timescale in a very widerange of lifetimes they should behave as stable in accelerator experiments. For example,with an intermediate scale of about 1011 GeV (as in supersymmetry models [41]) the ex-pected lifetime ofU -(or D-) quark∼ 106 years is much less than the age of the Universebut such quark is practically stable in any collider experiments.

First year operation of the accelerator LHC has good discovery potential for U(D)-quarks with mass up to 1.5 TeV. U-hadrons born at acceleratorwill distinguish oneself byhigh pt, low velocity, by effect of a charge flipping during their propagation through thedetectors. All these features enable strongly to increase efficiency of event selection fromnot only background but also from alternative hypothesis.

In the present work we studied effects of 4th generation having restricted our analysis bythe processes with 4th generation quarks and antiquarks. However, as we have mentionedin the Introduction in the considered approach absolutely stable neutrino of 4th generationwith mass about 50 GeV also bearsy-charge. The selfconsistent treatment of the cosmo-logical evolution and astrophysical effects ofy-charge plasma of neutrinos, antineutrinos,quarks and antiquarks of 4th generation in charge symmetriccase will be the subject of

25

special studies. An attempt of such a treatment has been undertaken in the case of chargeasymmetry, described in this paper.

We believe that a tiny trace of heavy hadrons as anomalous helium and stable neutralO−Helium and mesons1 may be hidden at a low level in our Universe (nU

nb∼ 10−10−10−9)

and even at much lower level here in our terrestrial matter a density nUnb

∼ 10−23 in case ofcharge symmetry. There are good reasons to bound the 4th quark mass below TeV energy.Therefore the mass window and relic density is quite narrow and well defined, open to afinal test.

In case of charge asymmetry of 4th generation quarks, a nontrivial solution of theproblem of dark matter (DM) can be provided due to neutral O−Helium-like U-hadronsstates (ANO-helium in case ofy-interaction existence). Such candidates to DM havemany interesting implications in BBN, large scale structure of Universe and physics ofDM [16, 20–26]. It should catalyze new types of nuclear transformations, reminding al-chemists’ dream on the philosopher’s stone. It challenges direct search for species of suchcomposite dark matter and its constituents. A very low probability for their existence isstrongly compensated by the expectation value of their discovery.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to G. Dvali for reading the manuscript and important recommendations

References

[1] S. Dimopoulos et al., Phys. Rev.D41 (1990), 2388.

[2] C.B. Dover; T.K. Gaisser; G. Steigman, Phys. Rev. Lett.42 (1979), 1117. S. Wolfram,Phys. Lett.B82 (1979), 65. G.D. Starkman et al., Phys. Rev. D41 (1990), 3594. D. Ja-vorsek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001), 231804. S. Mitra, Phys. Rev.D70 (2004),103517; arXiv:astro-ph/0408341. G.D. Mack, J.F. Beacom, G. Bertone, Phys. Rev.D76 (2007), 043523; arXiv:0705.4298 [astro-ph].

[3] B.D. Wandelt et al., arXiv:astro-ph/0006344. P.C. McGuire, P.J. Steinhardt,arXiv:astro-ph/0105567. G. Zaharijas, G.R. Farrar, Phys.Rev.D72 (2005), 083502;arXiv:astro-ph/0406531.

[4] G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett.B287 (1992), 101. G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett.B372 (1996), 113;arXiv:hep-ph/9511237. R. Barbieri, G.R. Dvali, A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys.B391 (1993),487.

[5] M.Yu. Khlopov, K.I. Shibaev, Gravitation and Cosmology, Suppl.8 (2002), 45.

[6] K.M. Belotsky, M.Yu. Khlopov, K.I. Shibaev, Gravitation and Cosmology, Suppl.6(2000), 140.

1Storing these charged and neutral heavy hadrons in the matter might influence itse/m properties, leadingto the appearance of apparent fractional charge effect in solid matter [15]. The present sensitivity for such effectin metals ranges from10−22 to 10

−20 .

26

[7] D. Fargion et al., JETP Letters69 (1999), 434; arXiv:astro/ph-9903086.

[8] D. Fargion et al., Astropart. Phys.12 (2000), 307; arXiv:astro-ph/9902327.

[9] K.M. Belotsky, M.Yu. Khlopov, Gravitation and Cosmology, Suppl.8 (2002), 112.

[10] K.M. Belotsky, M.Yu. Khlopov, Gravitation and Cosmology 7 (2001), 189.

[11] M. Maltoni et al., Phys. Lett.B476 (2000), 107. V.A. Ilyin et al., Phys. Lett.B503(2001), 126. V.A. Novikov et al., Phys. Lett.B529 (2002), 111; JETP Lett.76 (2002),119.

[12] W.M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), Journal of physics G33 (2006), 1.

[13] S.L. Glashow, arXiv:hep-ph/0504287.

[14] D. Fargion, M. Khlopov, arXiv:hep-ph/0507087.

[15] K.M. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M.Yu. Khlopov, R. Konoplich, M. Ryskin, K. Shibaev,Gravitation and Cosmology11 (2005), 3-15; arXiv:hep-ph/0411271.

[16] K. Belotsky, M. Khlopov, K. Shibaev, Gravitation and Cosmology 12 (2006), 1;arXiv:astro-ph/0604518.

[17] Ya.B. Zeldovich, M.Yu. Khlopov, Phys. Lett.B79 (1978), 239.

[18] V.K. Dubrovich, D. Fargion, M.Yu. Khlopov, arXiv:hep-ph/0312105.

[19] K. Kohri, F. Takayama, Phys. Rev.D76 (2007), 063507; arXiv:hep-ph/0605243.

[20] M.Yu. Khlopov, JETP Lett.83 (2006), 1 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.83 (2006), 3];arXiv:astro-ph/0511796.

[21] K. Belotsky, M. Khlopov, K. Shibaev, arXiv:astro-ph/0602261.

[22] D. Fargion, M.Yu. Khlopov, C.A. Stephan, Class. Quantum. Grav.23 (2006), 7305;arXiv:astro-ph/0511789.

[23] M.Yu. Khlopov, arXiv:astro-ph/0607048.

[24] M.Yu. Khlopov, C. Kouvaris, Phys. Rev.D77 (2008), 065002; arXiv:0710.2189[astro-ph].

[25] M.Yu. Khlopov, Bled Workshops in Physics 2007, vol. 8, 114.

[26] M.Yu. Khlopov, arXiv:0801.0167 [astro-ph].

[27] M.Yu. Khlopov, arXiv:0801.0169 [astro-ph].

[28] Yu.M. Shirkov, N.P. Yudin, Yadernaya Fizika (in rus), Fizmatlit, Moscow, 1980.C. Samanta et al., arXiv:nucl-th/0504085.

[29] R. Cyburt, Phys. Rev.D70 (2004), 023505.

27

[30] M.Yu. Khlopov, JETP Lett.33 (1981), 162.

[31] Y. Ascasibar, arXiv:astro-ph/0612130. K. Freese, D. Spolyar, A. Aguirre,arXiv:0802.1724 [astro-ph]. E. Vasiliev, M. Zelnikov, arXiv:0803.0002 [astro-ph].I.V. Moskalenko, L.L. Wai, arXiv:astro-ph/0608535; Astrophys. J.659 (2007), L29–L32; arXiv:astro-ph/0702654; arXiv:0704.1324 [astro-ph]. M. Fairbairn, P. Scott,J. Edsjo, Phys. Rev.D77 (2008), 047301; arXiv:0710.3396 [astro-ph].D. Spolyar, K. Freese, P. Gondolo, arXiv:0705.0521 [astro-ph]; arXiv:0709.2369[astro-ph].

[32] J. Klein et al., Proceedings of the Symposium on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry;Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, USA, 1981.

[33] J. Vandegriff et al., Phys. Lett.B365 (1996), 418.

[34] P. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004), 022501.

[35] P.F. Smith, J.R.J. Bennet, Nucl. Phys.B149 (1979), 525. P.F. Smith, Nucl. Phys.B206(1982), 333. T.K. Hemmick et al., Phys. Rev.D41 (1990), 2074. P. Verkerk et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett.68 (1992), 1116. T. Yamagata, Y. Takamori, H. Utsunomiya, Phys.Rev.D47 (1993), 1231.

[36] M.Yu. Khlopov, C.A. Stephan, arXiv:astro-ph/0603187.

[37] D. McCammon et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth.A370 (1996), 266. D. McCammon et al.,Astrophys. J.576 (2002), 188; arXiv:astro-ph/0205012.

[38] C.B. Winkelmann, Y.M. Bunkov, H. Godfrin, Gravitationand Cosmolology11 (2005),87.

[39] T. Sjostrand et al., Computer Phys. Commun.135 (2001), 238;arXiv:hep-ph/0010017.

[40] K.M. Belotsky et al., Phys. Rev.D68 (2003), 054027; arXiv:hep-ph/0210153.

[41] K. Benakli, Phys. Rev.D60 (1999), 104002. C.P. Burgess, L.E. Ibanez, F. Quevdo,Phys. Lett. B447 (1999), B447, 257. S.A. Abel, B.C. Allanach, F. Quevdo,L.E. Ibanez, M. Klein, arXiv:hep-ph/0005260.

28