SSP2013: Altmetrics for Research Assessment
-
Upload
william-gunn -
Category
Science
-
view
53 -
download
0
Transcript of SSP2013: Altmetrics for Research Assessment
Metrics for Assessing Research Impact
Society for Scholarly Publishing June 2013
William Gunn, PhD Head of Academic Outreach
@mrgunn
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-2054
Based in London, Mendeley is researchers, graduates and software developers from...
Key questions
• What’s the problem?
• What’s the opportunity?
• How do we serve researchers?
• How do we get the context right?
What is the problem?
• Is a researcher doing impactful research?
• Does an institution have an effective research program?
• Is the research being effectively disseminated?
• Is the work advancing the field?
How do you measure advancement?
What are the units?
The HIPPO
http
s://s
ecure
.flickr.c
om
/pho
tos/d
oug8888
8/5
937412
419/
People like numbers https://secure.flickr.com/photos/tifotter/2312080178/
“Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that
counts can be counted.” – William Bruce Cameron (1967)
Let research be research
http
s://s
ecure
.flickr.c
om
/pho
tos/b
ert_
m_b/2
41
8461161
http://xkcd.com/54/
The Opportunity
• Helping researchers make better decisions
• Some answers
– Find out what researchers really need & try to meet that need.
• Some unanswered questions
– What do the different metrics tell you?
– Whose needs are best served by which info?
• Some unasked questions
What we do know
• Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark” oncology publications could not be reproduced.
• Bayer: 43 of 67 oncology & cardiovascular projects were based on contradictory results
• Dr. John Ioannidis: Of 432 publications purporting sex differences in hypertension, multiple sclerosis, or lung cancer, only one data set was reproducible.
“authors who make data from their articles available are cited twice as frequently as articles with no data… but otherwise equal qualifications” Gleditsch, N.P. & Strand, H. Posting your data: will you be scooped or will you be famous? International Studies Perspectives 4, 89-97 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.04105
“The state of knowledge of the human race is sitting in the scientists’ computers, and is currently not shared […] We need to get it unlocked so we can tackle those huge problems.”
Post-scarcity in data
“Preservation should be baked into the tools that we use… I would like for you to think of yourselves as people engaged in a task that is important to everyone and not just people in a scholarly niche.”
...and aggregates research data in the cloud
Mendeley extracts research data…
Mendeley makes science more collaborative and transparent:
Install Mendeley Desktop
http
://ww
w.n
ickjr.c
om
/sh
ow
s/d
ora
/ind
ex.jh
tml
Future Directions
• Let’s get better at understanding how to meet researcher needs.
• Let’s get the context right for metrics.
• Practical tips
– Collect lots of data
– Build expertise in analysis
– Make that data available openly – it’s more valuable in aggregate than siloed apart.
www.mendeley.com