Source: Veugelers, Aiginger, Breznitz, Edquist, Murray, Ottaviano, Hyytinen, Kangasharju, Ketokivi,...

Source: Veugelers, Aiginger, Breznitz, Edquist, Murray, Ottaviano, Hyytinen, Kangasharju, Ketokivi, Luukkonen, Maliranta, Maula, Okko, Rouvinen, Sotarauta, Tanayama, Toivanen, Ylä-Anttila. 28 Oct. 2009. Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System – Policy Report. Taloustieto Oy.

The framework and organization of the evaluation

Finnish and US labor productivity of non-financial firms in 2004 euros (left); Finland’s share of the annual European Patent Office

applications (right)


Applications at the European Patent Office, 2000–6


Annual change of all R&D working hours done in Finland (%)


Evolution of total R&D hours worked in Finland by sector


Composition of R&D labor hours by workers’ educational level


Grades of the overall performance of the NIS from 4 (fail) to 10 (excellent)


Complexity of the national innovation system as a whole (left) and of the promotion for private innovative activity (right)


The expected success of the university reform in promoting its four main objectives

(deviations from a neutral position)


The role of SHOKs and PROs in the national innovation system(deviations from a neutral position)


The penetration of the National Innovation Strategy into national public education and innovation support organizations


The scope/broadness of innovation policy and its net gains to the society


The inherent tensions among the three key ministries in the education, research, innovation, and growth policy


Attendance of the Research and Innovation Policy Council


97%76%88%3%

25%92%14%25%24%42%41%

76%85%88%64%74%90%78%80%80%90%96%83%42%50%78%91%58%

Prime MinisterMinister of Economic AffairsMinister of EducationMinister of Finance

Minister for Foreign Trade and Dev.Minister of Agriculture and ForestryMinister of Culture and SportMinister of DefenceMinister of LabourMinister of Social Affairs and HealthMinister of the Environment

Academy of FinlandTekesVTT, Technical Research Centre of F.SYKE, Finnish Environment InstituteUniversity: HelsinkiUniversity: Helsinki, TechnologyUniversity: JyväskyläUniversity: KuopioUniversity: OuluUniversity: TampereUniversity: TurkuPolytechnic: Central OstrobothniaEK, C. of Finnish Industries, NokiaEK, C. of F. Ind., Finnzymes OyEK, C. of F. Ind., Juvantia PharmaEK, C. of Finnish Ind., Premix OySAK, Central Org. of F. Trade Unions

Present Not present Not a member

2002 -03 -04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09

Sectoral research in Finland by research area, budget funding (2009)


Importance of various public actors as evaluated by other actors within the system


Percentage of Yes answers to the overlap between different actors of the NIS


Attitudes of the actors of the NIS regarding the impact of the University Inventions Act on facilitating collaboration


Rankings based on the number of participants in the EU FP per million inhabitants (left) and per the gross domestic expenditures on R&D

(right)


The concept of a demand- and user-orientated innovation policy

Provider User(intermediate?)

Demandgenerator?

Goods and services

(Derived?)Demand User

(ultimate?)


A stylized illustration of the steps and interaction in innovative activity


The innovation system’s orientation evaluated by the actors of the system


Share of firms engaged in innovative activity that consider the source in question as being a very important (or important) contributor to their

innovative activity


Distribution of Finnish innovative firms by the highest type of exercised user interaction in innovative activity


User interaction in innovative activity and labor productivity (value added per employee)


Correlation of the overall innovation index and globalization sub-indices regarding social (top), economic (bottom left), and political (bottom right)

aspects

Socialglobalization50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

BE

EL

LV

LT

ATCA

CZ

HU

IENL

AU

BG HR

CYEE

ITMT

NO

PL PT

RO

SK

SIES

TR

DKFI

FR

DE

IS

IL

LU

SE

CH

UKUS

Inno

vativ

enes

s

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

AU

AT

BG

CA

HR

CYCZ

DK

EE

FI

FR

DE

EL HU

IS

IL

IT

LV

LTMT

NO

PL PT

RO

SK

SIES

SE

CH

TR

UKUS

Innovati

ven

ess

Economic globalization

BEIELU

NL

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

AU

ATBE

BG

CA

HR

CYCZ

DK

EE

FI

FR

DE

ELHU

IS IE

IL

IT

LV

LT

LU

MT

NL

NO

PLPT

RO

SK

SIES

SE

CH

TR

UKUS

Innovati

ven

ess

Political globalization


Finland and the largest countries in terms of R&D in 2005 as % of the world total (left) as well as the 1995–2005 %-point changes (right)


The relationship between the relative innovative outputs (triadic patents per 1,000 of full-time-equivalent researchers)

and inputs (full-time-equivalent researchers per capita)


Year 2005 ranking of countries according to a globalization index as well as the 1995–2005 changes in ranking


National VC investments versus R&D investments in 2006


Respondents’ grades for the Finnish NIS overall (large circle) as well as for its ability to promote growth entrepreneurship and generate rapidly growing

firms (small circle)


Shares of respondents considering tax incentives efficient in promoting growth firms in Finland


Share of small innovative companies considering the policy measure to be important for them


An outline of a streamlined public enterprise support system


Geographic origins of significant Finnish innovations


Geographical distribution of public R&D units


The effect of public innovation support on regional aggregate productivity


Respondents’ opinion on innovation policy and regional aspects


Shares of respondents considering that universities, polytechnics, and

public research organizations (PROs) are successful in providing international first class research and research for national needs


Shares of respondents considering that universities, polytechnics, and public research organizations (PROs) are successful in providing

experts for international and regional business activities


University department by size differentiating between countries and quality


Teachers and researchers from Finland (left) and to Finland (right)


Population-adjusted Shanghai rankings of top 500 universities relative to USA (=100)


Respondents view on the importance of the objectives of joint research projects between universities/polytechnics and firms (left) and the business needs

involved (right)


An outline of a streamlined research and education structure


An outline of (public) actors and responsibilities in the Finnish NIS


Source: Veugelers, Aiginger, Breznitz, Edquist, Murray, Ottaviano, Hyytinen, Kangasharju, Ketokivi,...

Documents

Transcript of Source: Veugelers, Aiginger, Breznitz, Edquist, Murray, Ottaviano, Hyytinen, Kangasharju, Ketokivi,...