Sonic IR Imaging on Bell Composite Panels
138
Sonic IR Imaging on Bell Imact Panels (Hat and I-Beam) By: Justin Ar-Rasheed
-
Upload
justin-ar-rasheed -
Category
Engineering
-
view
59 -
download
4
Transcript of Sonic IR Imaging on Bell Composite Panels
- 1. Sonic IR Imaging on Bell ImactPanels (Hat and I-Beam)By: Justin Ar-Rasheed
- 2. Overview Behavior of Panels Observed Optimal Experimental Settings Tested Frequency Coupling Material Tip Size/Amplitude Additional Areas of Study Mode Pattern Vibration Automation
- 3. Legend:< 1 Diameter, 9 Each1.0 1.75 Diameter, 6 Each1.75 - 2.65 Diameter, 4 Each> 2.65 Diameter, 3 Each0.170 Skin0.096 SkinImpact Panel for Wayne State University609/30/2011 Final Impact Plan - RJB
- 4. Hat Panel
- 5. Test Experiments Shoot gun on various locations of panel Analyze results and come up with hypothesis
- 6. Ultrasound20KHz Handheld20k LPt 20:0.5:90240% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera30 Frames/sIR Camera 8sFile20K_handheld/40%_30fps_8s_01.ftsPanel mounted vertically
- 7. Ultrasound40KHz Handheld40k Lpe 40:0.5:4T100% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFile40k_handheld/100%_40fps_6s_02.fts
- 8. Ultrasound40KHz Table Gun40k Lpe 40:0.5:4T100% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFile40k_tableGun/40fra_6s_800ms_30lbs_coin.fts
- 9. Ultrasound40KHz Handheld40k Lpe 40:0.5:4T100% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFile40K_handheld/100%_40fps_6s_01_top.fts
- 10. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFiles20PartitionShot/40%_Top33%_1.2s_40fps_6s20PartitionShot/50%_Top_left_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_0120PartitionShot/50%_Top_right_33%_800ms_40fps_6s01LeftMiddleRightLeft Middle Right
- 11. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFiles20PartitionShot/40%_Mid33%_1.2s_40fps_6s20PartitionShot/50%_Mid_left_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_0220PartitionShot/50%_Mid_right_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_02LeftMiddleRightLeft Middle Right
- 12. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFiles20PartitionShot/50%_bottom_left_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_0120PartitionShot/50%_bottom_right_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_0120PartitionShot/50%_Mid_left_33%_800ms_40fps_6s_02LeftMiddleRight Left Middle Right
- 13. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFile20PartitionShot
- 14. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFileBellimpactpanel03/Bottomhalfveiw40fps_50%_800ms_6s_02Panel mounted horizontally
- 15. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFileBellimpactpanel03/Fullveiw40fps_50%_800ms_6s_03
- 16. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFileBellimpactpanel03/Tophalfveiw40fps_50%_800ms_6s_01
- 17. Experiment Setup:20kHz Handheld (500Wfrom backside)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds50% amplitude
- 18. Experimental Setup:20kHz Handheld (500W)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds50% amplitude
- 19. Experimental Setup:20kHz Handheld(500W)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds50% amplitudeFile Name : 20K_handheld_Amp50_middle_GunHandI_LogoLeftBottom.bmp
- 20. Experimental Setup:20kHz Handheld (500W)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds60% amplitudeFile Name : 20K_handheld_Amp60_middle_GunGandN_LogoLeftBottom.bmp
- 21. Experimental Setup:20kHz Handheld (500W)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds60% amplitudeFile Name : 20K_handheld_Top_Amp60_GunOnTop_4inFromEdge.bmp
- 22. Experimental Setup:20kHz Handheld(500w)40 frames per secondTotal 6 seconds60% amplitudeFile Name : 20K_handheld_Bottom_Amp60_GunOnBottom_2inFromEdge.bmp
- 23. Back View
- 24. Structure I - Beam Thin area Doublers AreaSize L M S L M S L M SFront View(20k Table andHandheld)C,D,P,Q A G,F,N,M J,K,L IBack View(20kTable andHandheld)R,O SNever Seen(Both 20k &40k)B, E H
- 25. Frequency Experiments
- 26. 20k_Amp40%_without coin20k_Amp40%_with coin
- 27. 40k_Amp40%_without coin40k_Amp40%_with coin
- 28. 40k_Amp100%_without coin40k_Amp100%_with coin
- 29. Preferred Frequency20K
- 30. Small Tip ExperimentCoupling Materials and Tips
- 31. Small Tip Experiment Coin + Business Card (20 lbs) Coin + Cardboard (20 lbs) Coin + Duct Tape (20 lbs) Coin + Teflon (20 lbs) Business Card (20 lbs) (40 lbs) Cardboard (20 lbs) (40 lbs) Duct Tape (20 lbs) Teflon (20 lbs)
- 32. Coin + Business Card (20 lbs)60% (4.56 RMS) 80% (6.27 RMS)
- 33. Coin + Cardboard (20 lbs)60% (0.85 RMS) 80% (1.80 RMS)
- 34. Coin + Duct Tape (20 lbs)60% (4.22 RMS) 80% (3.46 RMS)
- 35. Coin + Teflon (20 lbs)60% (4.75 RMS)
- 36. Business Card (20 lbs)60% (1.35 RMS) 80% (1.27 RMS)
- 37. Business Card (40 lbs)60% (1.53 RMS) 80% (2.25 RMS)
- 38. Cardboard (20 lbs)60% (0.64 RMS) 80% (0.76 RMS)
- 39. Cardboard (40 lbs)60% (1.33 RMS) 80% (1.64 RMS)
- 40. Duct Tape (20 lbs)60% (5.64 RMS) 80% (N/A RMS) (15 lbs)
- 41. Teflon (20 lbs)40% (0.57 RMS)
- 42. Medium Tip ExperimentCoupling Materials and Tips
- 43. Medium Tip Experiment Coin + Duct Tape (40 lbs) Coin + Duct Tape (60 lbs) Coin + Teflon (40 lbs) Coin + Teflon (20 lbs) Business Card (40 lbs) Cardboard (40 lbs) Duct Tape (40 lbs)
- 44. Coin + Duct Tape (40 lbs)60% (0.67 RMS) 100% (0.96 RMS)
- 45. Coin + Duct Tape (60 lbs)60% (0.85 RMS) 100% (0.84 RMS)
- 46. Coin + Teflon (40 lbs)60% (0.75 RMS) 100% (1.15 RMS)
- 47. Coin + Teflon (20 lbs)60% (0.19 RMS) 100% (5.95 RMS)
- 48. Business Card (40 lbs)60% (0.84 RMS) 100% (1.53 RMS)
- 49. Cardboard (40 lbs)60% (0.76 RMS) 100% (0.93 RMS)
- 50. Large Tip ExperimentCoupling Materials and Tips
- 51. Large Tip Experiment Coin + Duct Tape (40 lbs) Coin + Teflon (20 lbs) Business Card (40 lbs) (60 lbs) Cardboard (40 lbs) (60 lbs) Duct Tape (15 lbs) (30 lbs)
- 52. Coin + Teflon (40 lbs)60% (0.71 RMS) 100% (2.18 RMS)
- 53. Coin + Teflon (20 lbs)60% (0.90 RMS) 100% (1.61 RMS)
- 54. Business Card (40 lbs)60% (0.69 RMS) 100% (1.07 RMS)
- 55. Business Card (60 lbs)60% (0.84 RMS) 100% (1.19 RMS)
- 56. Cardboard (40 lbs)60% (0.29 RMS) 100% (0.44 RMS)
- 57. Cardboard (60 lbs)60% (0.39 RMS) 100% (0.57 RMS)
- 58. Duct Tape (15 lbs)60% (0.81 RMS) 100% (0.93 RMS)
- 59. Duct Tape (30 lbs)60% (1.18 RMS) 100% (1.42 RMS)
- 60. Best Coupling Materials Setup1. Business Card with Large tip2. Cardboard with Large tip
- 61. Vibration Analysis(Width-Wise)
- 62. I beam panel ; 20 kHz; 20lbs; Without coin;Conclusion: I beam structure is very hard to vibrate effectively.R1 GunVR3R2Name of shot RMS of vilocity (mm/s)Ref1 Vib Ref3 Ref202 52.69 47.61 19.07 45.9903 63.02 54.45 16.67 35.1204 77.46 36.31 23.62 42.5205 70.66 31.48 20.70 36.1807 75.92 37.96 24.51 44.71
- 63. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFilebellimpactpanel03/ref2Max Magnitude = 6.83 m/s RMS = 30.07mm/s
- 64. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFilebellimpactpanel03/vibMax Magnitude = 9.95 m/s RMS = 31.05mm/s
- 65. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFilebellimpactpanel03/ref1Max Magnitude = 31.63 m/s RMS = 84.55mm/s
- 66. Ultrasound20KHz20k LPt 20:0.5:90250% Amplitude800ms PulseCamera40 Frames/sIR Camera 6sFileBellimpactpanel03/ref3Max Magnitude = 36.13 m/s RMS = 88.58m
- 67. 15 inchesJGNRBDefect J shows upPower Amplitude: 10%Load: 25lbsInput Frequency: 20kHzRMS(Root Mean Square): 41.55mm/s
- 68. 15 inchesDefect N shows upPower Amplitude: 20%Load: 25lbsInput Frequency: 20kHzRMS(Root Mean Square): 117.7mm/sJGNRB
- 69. 25 inchesDefect G shows upPower Amplitude: 45%Load: 25lbsInput Frequency: 20kHzRMS(Root Mean Square): 90.66mm/sJGNRB
- 70. 25 inchesDefect R shows upPower Amplitude: 45%Load: 25lbsInput Frequency: 20kHzRMS(Root Mean Square): 44.08mm/sJGNRB
- 71. 30 inchesDefect B shows upPower Amplitude: 35%Load: 25lbsInput Frequency: 20kHzRMS(Root Mean Square): 53.73mm/sJGNRB
- 72. Vibration Analysis(Length-wise)
- 73. 10 inches180160140120100806040200Vibration Data in Thin Channel0 10 20 30 40 50 60Vibration Amplitude(mm/s)Distance from Transducer (inches)10% Amplitude20% Amplitude30% Amplitude40% Amplitude50% AmplitudeTransducer
- 74. 10 inchesTransducer140120100806040200Vibration Data in Doubler Channel0 10 20 30 40 50 60Vibration Amplitude (mm/s)Distance from Transducer (inches)10% Amplitude20% Amplitude30% Amplitude40% Amplitude50% Amplitude
- 75. 4 4 8 10GunI beam panel ; Center doubler channel; 20 kHz; 20lbs; Without coin;Conclusion: Experiment is repeatable and vibration results show some periodicity property.
- 76. Gun4 4 8 10I beam panel ; 20 kHz; 20lbs; Without coin;Conclusion: Experiment is repeatable and vibration results show some periodicity property.
- 77. Hat Pattern Consistency Test(Vibration Study)
- 78. Mode PatternLeft Gun Shot
- 79. Time LapseLeft Gun Shot
- 80. Mode PatternMiddle Gun Shot
- 81. Time LapseMiddle Gun Shot
- 82. Mode PatternRight Gun Shot
- 83. Time LapseRight Gun Shot
- 84. Video
- 85. Consistency TestRight Shot 1
- 86. Consistency TestRight Shot 2
- 87. Consistency TestRight Shot 3
- 88. Consistency TestRight Shot 4
- 89. Consistency TestRight Shot 6
- 90. Consistency TestRight Shot 7
- 91. Consistency TestRight Shot 8
- 92. Consistency TestRight Shot 9
- 93. Mode Pattern Consistency(Discard 3)1 2 3 4 5 6 71 O O O O O2 O O O O O O34 O O O O O O O5 O O O O O O6 O O O O O O O7 O O O O O O8 O O O O O9 O O O O O O O10 O O O O O O11 O O O O O O O12 O O O O O O13 O O O O O O O1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 135 6 0 7 6 7 6 5 7 6 7 6 7
- 94. Vibrometer TestOFV-551 VibDistance (mm) RMS (mm/s) Signal Level Stability135 2.60 1.00 High339 2.60 1.00 High543 2.60 1.00 High747 2.60 1.00 High951 2.59 1.00 High237 2.60 1.00 High441 2.60 1.00 High645 2.60 1.00 Low849 2.60 1.00 High1053 2.60 0.90 LowAverage 2.60 0.99 HighOFV-511 Ref3Distance (mm) RMS (mm/s) Signal Level Stability232 2.58 0.85 No437 2.56 0.70 No642 2.56 0.30 No847 2.55 0.35 No1052 2.56 0.00 No335 2.56 0.60 No540 Error 0.35 No745 2.56 0.40 No950 2.55 0.45 No1155 2.53 0.40 NoAverage 2.56 0.44 No
- 95. Defects 1 & 21.210.80.60.40.20Source, 1 and 21 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25RMSTrial #12Source
- 96. Defects 4 & 112.521.510.50Source, 4 and 111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Axis TitleAxis Title411Source
- 97. Defects 5 & 102.521.510.50Source, 5 and 101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25RMS (m/s)Trial #Source105
- 98. Defects 6 & 131.61.41.210.80.60.40.20Source, 6 and 131 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25RMS (m/s)Trial #613Source
- 99. Defects 7 & 1221.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20Source, 7 and 121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25RMS (m/s)Trial #712Source
- 100. Defects 8 & 921.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20Source, 8 and 91 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25RMSTrial #89Source
- 101. New Approach Fixed Camera Enables Image Processing
- 102. High Vibration
- 103. Steps Fixed Camera Images Convert to Binary Image Registration (Optional) Binary Operation Point selection
- 104. Registration
- 105. Binary Operation
- 106. Selected Points
- 107. Results1 2 3 4 5 6Point 0.45 0.14 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.14Source 2.29 2.25 2.32 2.49 2.43 2.38Ratio 0.20 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.06
- 108. Low Vibration
- 109. Low Vibration
- 110. Results1 2 3 4 5 6Point 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.06Source 2.08 2.28 2.00 1.86 2.50 2.22Ratio 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03
- 111. ResultsHigh1 2 3 4 5 6Point 0.45 0.14 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.14Source 2.29 2.25 2.32 2.49 2.43 2.38Ratio 0.20 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.06Low1 2 3 4 5 6Point 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.06Source 2.08 2.28 2.00 1.86 2.50 2.22Ratio 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03
- 112. Conclusion High density granule areas indicate lowvibration Low density granule areas indicate highvibration
- 113. TT-Plot Automation.
- 114. Hat Defect Locations
- 115. Legend:< 1 Diameter, 9 Each1.0 1.75 Diameter, 6 Each1.75 - 2.65 Diameter, 4 Each> 2.65 Diameter, 3 Each0.170 Skin0.096 SkinImpact Panel for Wayne State University609/30/2011 Final Impact Plan - RJB
- 116. TT-Plot on Hat
- 117. Sample of TT-Plot fromDefect JVideo = VFrames = F1FnF1Fn VPixels = P1,1Pn,nTT-Plot = P for all FDefect J = J (White)J = {P}J FTT-PlotThreshold Sampling
- 118. TT-Plot for Frame Subset (Pixels) for allVideo0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20010.950.90.850.80.750.70.650.60.55All Defects in Neighborhood + ErrorPixel ValueFrame
- 119. Min and Max Graphs for TT-Plot0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2001.21.110.90.80.70.60.5Max and Min Defect in NeighborhoodPixel ValueFrame
- 120. Scanned Matching TT-Plots that fallbetween Min and Max TT-Plots
- 121. Repeated for Defect F
- 122. TT-Plots and Min/Max0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20010.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.2All Defects in Neighborhood + ErrorPixel ValueFrame0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2001.110.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1Max and Min Defect in NeighborhoodPixel ValueFrame
- 123. Matching TT-Plots
- 124. Combined Matching TT-Plots
- 125. Sample of TT-Plots on defect Jwith subtraction
- 126. TT-Plots and Min/Max0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20010.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10All Defects in NeighborhoodPixel ValueFrame0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2001.210.80.60.40.20-0.2Max and Min Defect in Neighborhood + 9% ErrorPixel ValueFrame
- 127. Scanned Matching TT-Plots that fallbetween Min and Max TT-Plots
- 128. 4 Point Smooth, 4% Error, 31%Threshold6 Point Smooth, 6% Error, 31%Threshold
- 129. 4 Point Smooth, 7% Error, 31%Threshold6 Point Smooth, 7% Error, 31%Threshold
- 130. 4 Point Smooth, 4% Error, 27%Threshold6 Point Smooth, 4% Error, 27%Threshold
- 131. With and Without TT-Plot AutomationBefore After
- 132. Conclusion Shows possibility of automatic defectdetection Does not support hypothesis that depth ofdefect is directly proportional to how slow itshows up on camera
- 133. Final Conclusion Behavior of Panels Observed Optimal Experimental Settings Tested Frequency Coupling Material Tip Size/Amplitude Additional Areas of Study Mode Pattern Vibration Automation
- 134. Future Work Further study on mode pattern Further study on TT-Plot shape ofdefects/depth of defects