Social Media for Public Companies

21
Social Media: Best Practices for Canadian Public Companies Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions Group June 21, 2011

description

This slideshow was presented at a seminar on June 21, 2011 at Fasken Martineau's Vancouver office highlighting best practices as well as potential legal pitfalls for public companies using social media for disclosure.

Transcript of Social Media for Public Companies

Page 1: Social Media for Public Companies

Social Media: Best Practices for Canadian Public Companies

Securities and Mergers & Acquisitions GroupJune 21, 2011

Page 2: Social Media for Public Companies

Welcome

• Moderator: Georald Ingborg, Partner, Fasken Martineau

• Panelists:• Eleanor Fritz, Director, Compliance & Disclosure, TSX• Rhylin Bailie, Director of Communications/IR, NovaGold• Caroline Clapham, Associate, Fasken Martineau

Page 3: Social Media for Public Companies

How you can digitally take part today:

• Share the information you heard here today on Twitter using the hashtag:

#FaskenSM4Pubcos

• Ask questions of the panellists using the hashtag and an @reply to:

@CarolineClapham

Page 4: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Either Twitter orFacebookBoth Twitter andFacebookTwitter Only

Facebook Only

Page 5: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

Natural ResourcesTechnologyConsumer GoodsAirlineBanks

Page 6: Social Media for Public Companies

Current Social Media Landscape (Canada)

• Average # of Followers = 1,375 • Highest # of Followers = Lululemon

(84k) and Westjet (75k)

• Highest # of Fans = RIM (>7M) and Tim Hortons (1.6M)

Page 7: Social Media for Public Companies

NovaGold – a social media leaderGoal: expanding stakeholder reach

Page 8: Social Media for Public Companies

Implementation: Convincing your Team

Page 9: Social Media for Public Companies

$NG’s Experience:

Page 10: Social Media for Public Companies

General vs. Selective Disclosure

Page 11: Social Media for Public Companies

Material Fact or Material Change?

• Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc. (Supreme Court Of Canada)

• AiT Advanced Information Technologies Corporation, Bernard Jude Ashe And Deborah Weinstein (Ontario Securities Commission)

Social media implication: material changes must be generally disclosed

Page 12: Social Media for Public Companies

Misrepresentations

• Untrue statement• Half-true Statement – ie. Not enough info• Unintentional omission to disclose

Social media implication: THERE ARE NO TAKE-BACKS – every tweet/post is permanent

Page 13: Social Media for Public Companies

Third party information

• Endorsements• Sharing news• Promotional content• Entanglement• Analyst coverage

Social media implication: be careful with third party disclosure and information

Page 14: Social Media for Public Companies

Disclaimers and Mandated Disclosure

• Safe harbour statements - when, where and how

• Technical information

Social media implication: include links to meet disclosure requirements

Page 15: Social Media for Public Companies

Dissemination in the United States

• Is your company listed in the US?• What constitutes dissemination?• When is dissemination acceptable?

Social media implication: issuers that are not listed in the United States need to be attuned to these issues – consult legal before you post/tweet!

Page 16: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 17: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 18: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 19: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 20: Social Media for Public Companies
Page 21: Social Media for Public Companies