Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

27
Sino-US Agriculture Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Trade and WTO Negotiations Negotiations (Draft) (Draft) Embassy of China, P.R. Weining Zhao March, 2005

description

Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft). Embassy of China, P.R. Weining Zhao March, 2005. Main Contents. I . Sino-US Agriculture Trade II.Chinese Government Policy in Agriculture Production and Rural Development III.China’s WTO Negotiation Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Page 1: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Sino-US Agriculture Trade Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiationsand WTO Negotiations

(Draft)(Draft)

Embassy of China, P.R.

Weining Zhao

March, 2005

Page 2: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Main ContentsMain Contents

II. Sino-US Agriculture Trade. Sino-US Agriculture Trade

II.Chinese Government Policy in II.Chinese Government Policy in Agriculture Production and Rural Agriculture Production and Rural DevelopmentDevelopment

III.China’s WTO Negotiation ProcessIII.China’s WTO Negotiation Process

IV. China’s Agriculture Laws and IV. China’s Agriculture Laws and RegulationsRegulations

Page 3: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

I. Sino-U.S. Agriculture Trade

Page 4: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Agriculture Import China’s Agriculture Import and Exportand Export

1) China has transited from a net agriculture product export country to net import country 3 years after entry into WTO. (Billion $)

Year Export Import Ex-Imp

2002 18.14 12.45 +5.69

2003 21.43(+18%) 18.93(+52%) +2.5

2004 23.39(+9%) 28.03(+48%) -4.64

Page 5: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Sino-U.S. Agriculture Sino-U.S. Agriculture TradeTrade

2) China has become U.S.’s 4th export market

Year Export Import Ex-Imp

2002 1.68 (26%) 2.72(2%) -1.04

2003 2.1(+25%) 5(+84%) -2.90

2004 3.01(+18%) 5.97(+12%) -2.96

(Billion USD)

Page 6: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

U.S. Agriculture Product U.S. Agriculture Product Export to ChinaExport to China

2003 2004

Quantity Value Quantity Value

Soybean 11 2888 9.4 2328

Wheat 0.23 35.25 2.94 495

Cotton 0.58 763 0.93 1416

(unit: million metric tons & million USD)

Page 7: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

II. Chinese Government Policy on Agriculture Production and Rural Development

Page 8: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

1.Strengthened Production to 1.Strengthened Production to Ensure Grain Security for Chinese Ensure Grain Security for Chinese

Grain Security affects social stability, economical and national security

As of 22% of the World population 1.3 billion people, and with only 7% of World arable land, grain security stands the top government agenda.

After 4 consecutive year decline, grain production in 2004 reached 469 million metric tons

Page 9: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

1.Strengthened Production to 1.Strengthened Production to Ensure Grain Security (Ensure Grain Security (Continued) Continued) Increase planting acreage: last autumn

planted 700,000 hectares more of wheat than previous year, which might bring four percent of output increase for 2005 summer harvest.

tap the potential of farmland by improving irrigation facilities and adopting advanced technologies.

Scientific and technological applications should be promoted to foster improved breeds

Page 10: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

ContinuedContinued

Medium-yield land, with a benchmark production of 5.4 tons per hectare, accounts for two-thirds of the country's total arable land. China will apply more technical and financial resources to upgrade this into high-yield land, which boasts a benchmark production of 7.7 tons per hectare.

Page 11: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

2. A Stricter Protection of Arable2. A Stricter Protection of Arable LandLand

China had 140 million ha of arable land in 1996 and now 126 million ha.

Target: by 2010, to feed 1.4 billion people then, China should retain 128 million ha. Of arable land. The total reduced arable land should not surpass 6.4 million ha. And non agriculture arable land requisition should not surpass 2 million ha.

Page 12: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

3. Relieve Farmers’ Burden & 3. Relieve Farmers’ Burden & Increase Farmer’s IncomeIncrease Farmer’s Income

Direct subsidies for grain growers. In 2004, 600 million farmers in 29 pro

vince received 11.6 billion yuan (1.45 billion $)

In 2005, 11.6 billion yuan plus 10% will be paid to grain growers. And 5.5 billion yuan (66 million $) will be subsidized to govmt of 800 graincnty

Page 13: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

ContinuedContinued

Tax cuts and exemptions. China announced in 2004 exemption of all agri-tax in 5 years.

Up to now, 26 provinces have already cut and exempted agri-tax.

By 2006, all of country will exempt farmers of agri-tax,which is annually 40 billion yuan (5 billion USD)

Page 14: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

III. China’s WTO Negotiation III. China’s WTO Negotiation Process & StandsProcess & Stands

Page 15: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

1. China’s WTO 1. China’s WTO Commitments in Agriculture Commitments in Agriculture

1) Reduce tariffs on agricultural goods of greatest importance to U.S. farmers from a 1997 average of 31 percent to 14 percent.

2) Establish annual tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) for import of selected key commodities. TRQs are at low tariffs ranging from 1 to 9 percent. Quotas were initially set for years 2002-04 for most commodities (through 2005 for vegetable oils).

Page 16: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

ContinuedContinued 3) Eliminate export subsidies. 4) Limit non-commodity-specific

trade-distorting domestic agriculture support to no more than 8.5 percent of total agricultural output value. In addition,China must limit commodity- specific support to any given commodity to no more than 8.5% of that commodity's total value of production.

Page 17: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

ContinuedContinued5) Apply science-based sanitary and ph

ytosanitary standards to all agricultural goods, including grains, meats, and fruits.

6) Publish regulations governing trade and policy.

7) Open China's distribution and service sectors to foreign-owned firms.

Page 18: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

2. China’s Performance2. China’s Performance"I would give China's performance a to

p score," (Supachai Panitchpakdi, director-general of the WTO)

China deserves due recognition for the tremendous efforts made to reform its economy to comply with the requirements of the WTO. –quote from USTR Report

Page 19: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Chinn’s Performance (Continued)Chinn’s Performance (Continued)1) Tariff: The average tariff on farm

products has been lowered to 15.6 per cent, far below the 54 per cent that was evident before entry and the average world rate of 62 per cent.

2) Annual Tariff Rate Quotas: Wheat: 9.636 Million tons; Corn:7.2 million tons; Rice 5.32 million tons; Cotton: 0.894 million tones. (7.2; 1.9 )

Page 20: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Performance (Continued)China’s Performance (Continued)3) Has eliminated all export subsidies4) China’s agricultural support is far less tha

n 8.5% of total agricultural output value. An example in 2004:

Green Box: direct subsidies to grain growers 11 billion yuan(1.35 bln $)

230 mln yuan(27 mln $) qualty. Info.Amber Box: Seed subsidies 2.85 billion yuan (

340 mln $); farm machinery subsidies 70 million yuan (8.5 mln $) and 400 million (48 mln $) from local

Page 21: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Performance (Continued)China’s Performance (Continued)Agricultural tax cut 40 bln yuan. Agricultur

e output value: 2000 bln 5) Apply science-based sanitary and phytos

anitary standards to all agricultural goods, including grains, meats, and fruits.

6) Publish regulations governing trade and policy.

7) Open distribution and service sectors to foreign-owned firms.

Page 22: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

3. China’s Stands in WTO Agriculture Negotiation

Page 23: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Participating Institutions Participating Institutions

China takes a very active part in Doha round agriculture negotiations.

Negotiation representatives from MOFCOM and Ministry of Agriculture under which MOA Agriculture Trade Promotion Center.

Consultant Group consisting of Chinese experts.

Page 24: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Stand in WTO NegotiationChina’s Stand in WTO Negotiation

Aim:1) Improvements in market access;2) Reduction of, with a view to phasing out,

all forms of export subsidies;3) Reductions in trade-distorting domestic

support and agriculture product tariff.4) Phasing out tariff peak, tariff upgrading a

nd complex tariff.5) Substantially address the special & differ

ential treatment for developing Ctri.

Page 25: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Stand (Continued) China’s Stand (Continued)

The Present Situation in China: China has eliminated all export

subsidies; China’s domestic support AMS = 0 Low tariff and large quantity of TQ; China does not have peak tariff, but

simple form of tariff at low level.

Page 26: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

China’s Stand (Continued) China’s Stand (Continued)

China’s Stand:

In the Area of domestic support:

1) China supports substantial reduction in trade-distort support in amber box;

2) Restrain general support from amber box, blue box & de minimis

3) Reduce income payment in blue box

4) Strengthening discipline on support measures in Green Box

Page 27: Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft)

Thank You All !