Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges
Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges
Transcript of Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges
![Page 1: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“ SIMPLY SUPPORTED AND CONTINUOUS BRIDGES”
TALHA BIN MEHMOOD
SEAT NO: CE-013/2011-12
CE-512 (BRIDGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN)
![Page 2: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGES
When the main girders of a bridge are supported by a
movable hinge at one end and a fixed hinge or roller at the other end then such bridges are called
simply supported bridges
![Page 3: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
KEY POINTS Generally width of bridge is divided into
number of individual spans. For each span, the load carrying member is
simply supported at both ends.. Simply supported bridges should be provided
where adjacent spans are unavoidably different in length and depth, or where adjacent spans have widely different geometries with beam layouts that do not lend themselves to continuity, such as varying beam spacing or splayed framing
![Page 4: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
KEY POINTS (CONTINUE)Simply supported bridges may also be
preferable where the bridge is part of a facility, such as an interchange, where stage construction will require future removal or addition of one or more spans.
They are suitable at places where uneven settlements of foundations are likely to take place
They are generally best suited for short crossings and where speed of construction is an issue.
![Page 5: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CONTINUOUS BRIDGES
The bridge supported at three or more points and capable of
resisting bending and shearing forces at all sections throughout its
length.
![Page 6: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
KEY POINTS In continuous bridges spans are
continuous over two or more supports.They are statically indeterminate
structures. They are useful when uneven settlement
of supports does not take place.
![Page 7: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
KEY POINTS (CONTINUE)In continuous bridges the bending moment
anywhere in the span is considerably less than that in case of simply supported span. Such reduction of bending moment ultimately results in the economic section for the bridge.
In continuous bridges the stresses are reduced due to negative moments developed at pier or supports.
Continuous bridges are typically favored when a sound foundation is available and span lengths are greater
![Page 8: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
BEHAVIOR
![Page 9: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(SINGLE SPAN OR CONTINUOUS BRIDGES) AASHTO DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Continuous reinforced concrete slab bridge design shall be in conformance with AASHTO, latest edition.
For simple span reinforced concrete slab bridges cast in place directly on concrete substructures, the effective span length shall be considered equal to the clear span plus two-thirds (2/3) the slab bearing width but not more than the clear span plus the slab thickness.
![Page 10: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS(CONTINUE)
The Designer shall include a final deck surface elevation table. Elevations shall be shown for all profile grade lines, curb lines, crown lines, and phased construction lines for the full length of the bridge.
Bearing points, quarter-span points and mid-span points shall be detailed as well as any additional points required to meet a maximum spacing between points of 30'-0" [10 m].
![Page 11: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS(CONTINUE)
Details for simple span reinforced concrete slab bridge superstructures are provided in Standard Bridge Drawing SB-6-94.
Details for multi-span reinforced concrete slab bridge superstructures are provided in Standard Bridge Drawing CS-1-93
![Page 12: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
AASHTO SEISMIC ANALYSIS
SINGLE SPAN BRIDGES
Seismic analysis is not required for Single span bridges, regardless of seismic zone.
![Page 13: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CONTINUOUS SPAN BRIDGES
For continuous Span bridges, the minimum analysisrequirements shall be as specified in Table I in which;
* no seismic analysis requiredUL uniform load elastic methodSM single-mode elastic methodMM multimode elastic methodTH time history method
![Page 14: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CONTINUOUS SPAN BRIDGES According to AASHTO, The selection of the
method of analysis depends on Seismic zone, regularity, and importance of the bridge.
Regularity is a function of the number of spans and the distribution of weight and stiffness.
Regular bridges have less than seven spans; no abrupt or unusual changes in weight, stiffness, or geometry; and no large changes in these parameters from span to span or support-to-support, abutments excluded.
![Page 15: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CONTINUOUS SPAN BRIDGES
![Page 16: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ADVANTAGES OF CONTINUOUS BRIDGES OVER SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGES
Where possible, bridges should be made continuous. Continuous spans are less prone to catastrophic collapse from loss of substructure support due to stream erosion, earthquake, or vehicle or vessel collision
Aesthetically, continuous bridges are generally superior, especially if constant depth is maintained, and do not require the cosmetic plates or other devices that have sometimes been used to conceal the gaps between simple spans
![Page 17: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ADVANTAGES (CONTINUE)
As the bearings are placed on the centerline of piers, the reactions at piers are transmitted centrally.
It is found that the continuous girder bridge suffers less vibration and deflection.
The continuous girder bridge requires only one bearing at each pier as against two bearing for simply supported girder bridge.
![Page 18: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ADVANTAGES (CONTINUE)FFFF
![Page 19: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ADVANTAGES (CONTINUE)
The depth of decking at mid span is reduced.The expansion joints required will be less. There is reduction in cost as less quantity of
concrete and steel are required because of the reduction of mid-span moments
![Page 20: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
DISADVANTAGES OF CONTINUOUS BRIDGES OVER SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGES For a composite bridge, in regions of negative
moment the deck is considered to be cracked due to the tensile forces at the top of the section), however, that the reinforcing steel in the concrete slab can actually be taken as part of the composite section. This means that the tensile properties of the reinforcing steel can assist in resisting the tension which exists in the top flange of the composite section. This is one of the challenges faced by the designer due to continuous bridges.
![Page 21: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DISADVANTAGES (CONTINUE)Continuous bridges, however, incur greater fabrication costs
than their simply supported counterparts, where a simply supported span can be designed and erected relatively quickly.
The design of continuous spans is more involved as it is statically indeterminate structure and their construction impacted by the need for customized plate girders, splices, etc.
The detailing and placing of reinforcements are to be carried out with extreme care.
The placing of concrete and removal of formwork are to be executed carefully in proper sequence.
Continuous span bridges are also more susceptible to settlement problems than simply supported bridges
![Page 22: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGES IN THE WORLD
![Page 23: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Gotteron Bridge Fribourg, Switzerland
![Page 24: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Madison Bridge, Ohio River
![Page 25: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Missouri River Bridge, Chamberlain
![Page 26: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CONTINUOUS BRIDGES IN THE WORLD
![Page 27: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Continuous concrete highway bridge, Kentucky unites states
![Page 28: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Continuous steel plate girder bridge, Switzerland
![Page 29: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Main River Bridge,frankfurt Germany
![Page 30: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
REFRENCESwww.google.comHighway bridge structuresHighway engineering hand bookAASHTO LRFD Design Specifications 2007
![Page 31: Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061108/544c79feaf7959eb138b45a3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
THANK YOU !