Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

44
The Lean VC: a Silicon Valley 2.0 Story Dave McClure 500 Startups (@DaveMcClure) http://500startups.com Entrepreneur Week – Waterloo, Nov 2010 Re-Inventing Venture Capital Investing through Innovation, Incubation, & Iteration
  • date post

    17-Oct-2014
  • Category

    Technology

  • view

    17.088
  • download

    0

description

slides from my talk on changes in the Startup & Venture Capital industry, at Entrepreneur Week, Waterloo, Canada (Nov 2010).

Transcript of Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Page 1: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

The Lean VC:a Silicon Valley 2.0 Story

Dave McClure500 Startups

(@DaveMcClure) http://500startups.com Entrepreneur Week – Waterloo, Nov 2010

Re-Inventing Venture Capital Investing throughInnovation, Incubation, & Iteration

Page 2: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Changes.• Venture Capital = Fewer, Smaller Funds (<$100M)

– Decline of Large Funds (> $250m)– Birth of “Super Angel” Funds ($10-100M)– Market Changes: Fewer IPOs (>$1B), More/Smaller Acq’stns (<$250M)

• Platforms = Distribution + Monetization (not Technology)– Search (Google)– Social (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube)– Mobile (Apple, Android)

• Incubators & Metrics = Many Small Experiments (most FAIL)– Y-Combinator, TechStars, SeedCamp– Betaworks, fbFund REV, AngelPad– 500 Startups

Page 3: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Dave McClure: Bio

2000-2010:• Investor: 100+ Startups (Mint, SlideShare, Twilio, WildFire)• Marketing: PayPal, Simply Hired, Mint.com, Founders Fund• Community: Startup2Startup, GeeksOnaPlane, StartupVisa• Speaker: Startup Metrics, Stanford Facebook class

80’s & 90’s:• Entrepreneur: Founder/CEO Aslan Computing (acq.)• Developer: Windows App Dev / SQL DB Admin• Engineer: Johns Hopkins ‘88, BS Eng / Applied Math

Page 4: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

500 Startups Seed FundMountain View, CA – Founded 2010

• $30M Seed Fund & Startup Accelerator• Design, Distribution, Data• 60+ Portfolio Companies

– Twilio– Wildfire– SendGrid– MyGengo– Erply– Payvment– FlowTown– Medialets– ChinaNetCloud

Page 5: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

500 Hats LLC(Personal Investments: 13 deals, 2004-2008, ~$300K)

Results: 1 exit @ $170M (9x), +3-6 future wins2 addtl exits @ $50M, $70M (advisory roles)

Bix (acq YHOO)

Jambool (acq GOOG)

Page 6: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Founders Fund (Incubator/Seed Program: 43 deals, 2008-2010, ~$3M)

Facebook fbFund

22 incubator deals ($850K)

FF Angel LLC

21 seed deals($2M)

Results:8 raised seed rd $500K+ 3 small exits

Results:6 raised Series A $2M+2 raised Series B $5-10M+1 early exit @ 4x

FanBridge

Page 7: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

500 Startups LP Fund I(60+ investments @ ~$100K avg)

Wildfire Crave Tello AwayFind Indinero MyGengoRevnetics Mogotix EcoMom Zencoder GazeHawk Crocodoc

SayHired Recurly AppBistro Foodspotting Gantto Medialets

Rapportive TransFS SiteJabber GinzaMetrics Estately FlowTown

OneForty Twilio Postling Plancast ElaCarte WePay

Zappli Format Baydin GroupSpaces Rapportive ApsalarBunndle Udemy Brainient ReadyForZero Graphicly StoryJumperOtherInbox Viikii Zozi One True Fan Formative

LabsNetworkedBlogs

Page 8: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Venture Capital 2.0(smaller, faster, better)

Venture Capital 1.0 “Super” Angel (aka Micro-VC)

Page 9: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Silicon ValleyInvestor Ecosystem

Angels & Incubators($0-10M)

“Seed” Funds ($10-50M)

VC Funds ($50-250M)

VC Funds (>$250M)

True VenturesFirst Round Capital

BenchmarkAccel

Y-Combinator

TechStars

SoftTech (Clavier)FloodGate (Maples)Felicis (Senkut)SV Angel (Conway)

Page 10: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Venture Capital: Still Relevant?Good for big CAP:• Hardware• Enterprise SW• Clean Tech• BioScience• Facebook, Zynga, Groupon

Not So Great for:• Consumer Internet• Small Business• Consulting• Games, Porn ;)

Page 11: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

More & Smaller Acquisitions

• Mature Internet Platform Co’s:– GOOG, MSFT, YHOO, EBAY, AOL,

AMZN, AAPL, INTU, ADBE, Fbook• Lots of Users, $$$• Outsourcing Innovation

• Lots of M&A (but small)• Great for Angels & Entrepreneurs• Not so Great for (big) VCs

* Mint acquired by Intuit in Sept 2009 for $170M

Page 12: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Platforms 2.0Search, Social, Mobile

Page 13: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Web 2.0: Good Times.

1. # Users, Bandwidth = Bigger.2. Startup Costs = Lower.3. Transaction $$$ = Better.

Building Product => Cheaper, Faster, Better Getting Customers => Easier, More Measurable

Product & Marketing Decisions based on Measured User Behavior

R.I.P.*BAD*TIMES

Page 14: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Platform Viability

Users . . Money

Features

Growth Profit

ProfitableGrowth

Nirvana

Successful Platforms have 3 Things:1) Features2) Users3) Money

Page 15: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Distribution PlatformsCustomer Reach: 100M+

• Search: Google (SEO/SEM)

• Social: Facebook, Twitter, Zynga, LinkedIn

• Mobile: Apple (iPhone, iPad), Android, Blackberry

• Media: YouTube/Video, Blogs, Photos

• Inbox: Gmail, Yahoo, Microsoft

Page 16: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Web 2.0 Business Model: KISS (“Keep It Simple, Stupid”)

• 1) Re-invent Web 1.0 Businesses– Make a Website, a Widget, an App– Sell Stuff to People (Transactions, Subscriptions)

• 2) add Web 2.0 Technology– Search, Social, Mobile– Google, Facebook/Twitter, Apple/Android– Email, SMS, Ecommerce / Payments

• 3) Get Customers, Make Money– Distribution, Distribution, Distribution

Page 17: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Startup Incubators Lots of Hot, Cool, Web 2.0!

(+ lots of FAIL.)

Page 18: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Incubator 2.0: Fast, Cheap, FAIL• Incubators = supportive startup ecosystem (+ angels, VCs)• Efficient use of investment capital ($0-100K)• High fail rate (60-80%) => large initial sample size

Page 19: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Incubator 2.0: Education, Collaboration, Iteration

• Success based on:– many small startup experiments– common platforms, problems & solutions– physical proximity, open/collaborative environment– fast fail, iteration, metrics & feedback loop

• Incremental investment; high-risk, but high-reward

Page 20: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

fbFund REVfbFund REV: Facebook “Social” Incubator: invest in startups, apps,

websites based on Facebook platform & Facebook Connect.

• 22 startups @ ~$35K each ($850K total)• 3 month program: Technology, Design, Marketing, Business topics • Success: ~8 startups funded >$500K – Wildfire Interactive raised $4M

Page 21: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Startup Metrics & The Lean Startup

Measure Shit, Iterate.

Page 22: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

“What Metrics Should I Measure?”Users, Pages, Clicks, Emails, $$$...?

Q: Which of these is best? How do you know?• 1,000,000 one-time, unregistered unique visitors• 500,000 visitors who view 2+ pages / stay 10+ sec• 200,000 visitors who clicked on a link or button• 20,000 registered users w/ email address• 2,000 passionate fans who refer 5+ users / mo.• 1,000 monthly subscribers @ $5/mo

the good stuff.

Page 23: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Read Geoffrey MillerSex + Evolution + Consumer Mktg = Awesome Sauce

Page 24: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Other Great Shit.Psychology + Comics

Page 25: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Discover MeaningWhat Do Users Care About Enough to F**k or Kill ?

Kathy Sierra:“CreatingPassionateUsers”

Page 26: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

The Lean Startup• Progress ≠ Features; Measure Conversion• Talk to Customers; Discover Problems• Focus on “Product/Market Fit” (good solution)• Fast, Frequent Iteration (+ Feedback Loop)• Keep it Simple & Actionable

Page 27: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Discover Customers(Steve Blank, SteveBlank.com)

Page 28: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

LEARN BUILD

MEASURE

IDEAS

CODEDATA

Iterate: Learn, Measure, Build.(Eric Ries, StartupLessonsLearned.com)

Page 29: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Product/Market Fit Before “Launch”(Sean Ellis, Startup-Marketing.com)

[email protected]: startup-marketing.com

Page 30: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Startup Metrics for Pirates

• Acquisition: users come to site from various channels• Activation: users enjoy 1st visit: "happy” experience• Retention: users come back, visit site multiple times• Referral: users like product enough to refer others• Revenue: users conduct some monetization behavior

AARRR!

(note: If you’re in a hurry, Google “Startup Metrics” & watch 5m video)

Page 31: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

AARRR!: 5-Step Startup Metrics Model

Website.com

Revenue $$$

Biz DevAds, Lead Gen, Subscriptions, ECommerce

ACQUISITION

SEOSEM

Apps & Widgets

Affiliates

Email

PR Biz Dev

Campaigns, Contests

Direct, Tel, TV

Social Networks

Blogs

Domains

Retention

Emails & Alerts

System Events & Time-based

Features

Blogs, RSS, News Feeds

Page 32: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Q: What is My Business Model?

One of the following:1. Drive Usage (= Activation, Retention)2. Get Users (= Acquisition, Referral)3. Make Money (= Revenue*)

(Note: eventually need to turn Users/Usage -> Money)

Page 33: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Lean Startup Challenges

Startups have problems in 3 main areas:• Management: Set Priorities, Define Key Metrics, Make Decisions.

• Product: Build the “Right” Features. Measure, Iterate.

• Marketing: Distribution, Distribution, Distribution.

Page 34: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Role: Founder/CEOQ: Which Metrics? Why?A: Focus on Critical Few Actionable Metrics

(if you don’t use the metric to make a decision, it’s not actionable)

• Hypothesize Customer Lifecycle• Target ~3-5 Conversion Events (tip: Less = More)

• Test, Measure, Iterate to Improve

Page 35: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Role: Product / EngineeringQ: What Features to Build? Why? When are you “Done”?A: Easy-to-Find, Fun/Useful, Unique features that

Increase Conversion (stop iterating when increase decelerates)

• Wireframes = Conversion Steps• Measure, A/B Test, Iterate FAST (daily/weekly)• Optimize for Conversion Improvement

– 80% on existing feature optimization– 20% on new feature development

Page 36: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Role: Marketing / Sales

Q: What channels? Which users? Why?A: High Volume (#), Low Cost ($), High Conv (%)

• Design & Test Multiple Marketing Channels + Campaigns• Select & Focus on Best-Performing Channels & Themes• Optimize for conversion to target CTAs, not just site/landing page• Match/Drive channel cost to/below revenue potential

• Low-Hanging Fruit: – Blogs– SEO/SEM– Landing Pages– Automated Emails

Page 37: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

MAARRRketing Plan

Marketing Plan = Target Customer Acquisition Channels• 3 Important Factors = Volume (#), Cost ($), Conversion (%)• Measure conversion to target customer actions• Test audience segments, campaign themes, Call-To-Action (CTAs)

[Gradually] Match Channel Costs => Revenue Potential • Increase Vol. & Conversion, Decrease Cost, Optimize for Revenue Potential• Avg Txn Value (ATV), Ann Rev Per User (ARPU), Cust Lifetime Value (CLV)• Design channels that (eventually) cost <20-50% of target ATV, ARPU, CLV

Consider Costs, Scarce Resource Tradeoffs• Actual $ expenses• Marketing time & resources• Product/Engineering time & resources• Cashflow timing of expense vs. revenue, profit

Page 38: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

One Step at a Time.

1. Make a Good Product: Activation & Retention2. Market the Product: Acquisition & Referral3. Make Money: Revenue & Profitability

“You probably can’t save your Ass and your Face at the same time… choose carefully.” – DMC

Page 39: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Investor Metrics: “Super Angel” -> Lean VC

Not “Spray & Pray”, but rather“Quantitative, Incremental, Selective Follow-on”

Investing.

(Product, Market, Revenue.)

Page 40: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

“Lean Investor” Model

Method: Invest in many startups using incremental investment, iterative development. Start with lots of small experiments, filter out failure, and expand investment upon success… (Rinse & Repeat).

• Incubator: $0-100K (“Build & Validate Product”)• Seed: $100K-$1M (“Test & Grow Marketing Channels””)• Venture: $1M-$10M (“Maximize Growth & Revenue”)

Page 41: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Investment #1: Incubate(“Product”)

• Structure– 1-3 founders– $25K-$100K investment– Incubator environment: multiple peers, mentors/advisors

• Build Functional Prototype / “Minimum Viable Product” (MVP):– Prototype->Alpha, ~3-6 months– Develop Minimal Critical Feature Set => Get to “It Works”– Instrument Basic Dashboard, Conversion Metrics– Test Cust. Adoption (10-1000 users) / Cust. Satisfaction (Scale: 1-10)

• Demonstrate Concept, Reduce Product Risk, Test Functional Use• Develop Metrics & Filter for Possible Future Investment

Page 42: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Investment #2: Seed(“Market”)• Structure

– 2-5 person team– $100K-$1M investment– Syndicate of Angel Investors / Small VC Funds

• Improve Product, Expand Market, Test Revenue:– Alpha->Beta, ~6-12 months– Customer Sat ≥ 6 => Get to “Doesn’t Suck”– Setup A/B Testing Framework, Optimize Conversion– Test Marketing Campaigns, Cust Acqstn Channels

• Prove Solution/Benefit, Assess Market Size• Test Channel Cost, Revenue Opportunity• Determine Org Structure, Key Hires

Page 43: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Investment #3: Venture(“Revenue”)

• Structure– 5-10 person team– $1M-$5M investment– VC Investors

• Make Money, Get to Sustainability:– Beta->Production, 12-18 months– Customer Sat ≥ 8 => “It Rocks, I’ll Tell My Friends”– MktgPlan => Predictable Channels / Campaigns + Budget– Scalability & Infrastructure, Customer Service & Operations– Connect with Distribution Partners

• Prove/Expand Market, Operationalize Business• Future Milestones: Profitable/Sustainable, Exit Options

Page 44: Silicon Valley 2.0: The Lean VC (Waterloo)

Summary• Venture Capital 2.0 = Fewer, Smaller Funds (<$100M) +

More, Smaller Exits (<$100M)

• Platforms 2.0 = Distribution + Monetization, not Tech

• Incubators, Metrics = Many Small Experiments (most FAIL). – Measure Stuff.– Iterate, Iterate, Iterate.