Side Effects Management for the Ovarian Cancer Community
-
Upload
bkling -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
273 -
download
0
Transcript of Side Effects Management for the Ovarian Cancer Community
Targeted Therapies: Side effects and management
William Tew, MDAssociate Attending
Clinical Director, Gynecologic Medical OncologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
VERBAL DISCLOSURE• No conflicts to disclose.
Ovarian Cancer Type as a Biomarker
High Grade Serous Clear Cell Endometrioid Mucinous Low Grade Serous
Genetic Risk Factors
BRCA 1/2 HNPCC HNPCC None known None known
Precursor Lesion Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma
(STIC)
Endometriosis Endometriosis Unknown?Teratoma
Serous Borderline Tumor
Molecular Genetics
p53, BRCA, HR Defects,
Tumor Microenvironment
PI3K, ARID1A, MSI PTEN, beta-catenin, ARID1A, MSI
KRAS, HER2 BRAF, KRAS, NRAS
Potential Drugs •PARP inhibitors•Angiogenesis
•mTor•Angiogenesis
- •Trastuzumab•TDM-1
•MEKi•Angiogenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(4):1-8
Ovarian Cancer TherapiesFDA Approved1978 Cisplatin1990 Altretamine1991 Carboplatin1992 Paclitaxel1996 Topotecan2000 Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)2006 Gemcitabine + Carboplatin2014 Bevacizumab – platinum resistant(+weekly paclitaxel, PLD or topotecan)2014 Olaparib2016 Bevacizumab – platinum sensitive(+paclitaxel/carboplatin; gemcitabine/carboplatin)2016 Rucaparib 2017 Niraparib/Olaparib – 2nd remission
NCCN 1 or 2A• Capecitabine• Cyclophosphamide• Docetaxel• Doxorubicin• Etoposide (oral)• Ifosfamide• Irinotecan• Melphalan• Oxaliplatin• Paclitaxel, albumin bound (nab-paclitaxel)• Pemetrexed• Vinorelbine
TCGA
BRCA1 Germline
8%BRCA2
Germline6%
BRCA1 Somatic4%
BRCA2 Somatic3%
BRCA1 Methylation
11%
EMSY Amplification
6%PTEN Loss
6%Other HRD5%
CCNE1 Amplification
14%RB1 Loss4%
MMR Germline
2%
Other31%
HRDNot HRD
Mutually exclusive events
cBio Cancer Genomics Portal, MSKCC
BRCA1Germline,
8%
BRCA2Germline, 6%
BRCA1Soma c, 4%
BRCA2Soma c,3%
BRCA1Methyla on,
11%
PTENLoss, 6%Other HRD,
10%
CCNE1Amplifica on,
20%
RB1Loss, 15%
NF1Loss, 17%
HRDNot HRD
Putative driver events
cBio Cancer Genomics Portal, MSKCC and Patch et al., Nature, 2015
Targeted therapies: Toxicity • Immunotherapy• PARP inhibitors• VEGF inhibition
Harnessing the Power of the Immune System
How does the immune system recognize tumor as non-self?
Kerkar SP , Restifo NP Cancer Res 2012;72:3125-3130
Tumors are not just composed of cancer cells
Immunotherapy toxicities: Diverse• Cancer vaccines – injection site rxn and
constitutional symptoms• Cytokines – induce capillary leak• Adoptive cell therapy – cytopenias (prep chemo),
cytokine release syndrome and autoimmunity• T-cell regulation via immunomodulatory Ab….
Weber et al, JCO 2015
Immunomodulatory antibodies that regulate T cell activity
Turning up The Activating Blocking the InhibitingSlides courtesy of Drs. Dmitriy Zamarin and Alex Snyder
FDA Approved Targets
Turning up The Activating Blocking the Inhibiting
Year Drug Target Disease Indication
2011 Ipilimumab CTLA-4 Melanoma
2014 Nivolumab, pembrolizumab
PD-1 Melanoma
2015 Nivolumab, pembrolizumab
PD-1 NSCLC
2015 Nivolumab PD-1 RCC
2015 Nivolumab+ipilimumab PD-1 + CTLA4 Melanoma
2015 Pembrolizumab PD-1 Head and Neck SqCC
2016 Nivolumab PD-1 Hodgkin lymphoma
2016 Atezolizumab PDL-1 Urothelial cancer
2017? Anti-PD-1 MMR-deficient cancers
Current FDA Approvals: Checkpoint Inhibitors
*as of 10/30/2016
Nivolumab (Opdivo, BMS); Pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck); Atezolizumab (Tecentriq, Roche); Ipilimumab (Yervoy, BMS)
Checkpoint Inhibitors Toxicities• Result from inappropriate recognition of normal tissues by T cells, leading
to autoimmune tissue destruction. • Side effects are generally mild and infrequent, but when they do occur,
they can be serious and even life threatening if not identified and treated in a timely manner. Early recognition and treatment is essential.
• Need to be distinguished from other causes, especially infectious causes or underlying disease
• Toxicities can be long-lasting, even after therapy discontinuation. Some toxicities appear after therapy discontinuation.
• Some toxicities are irreversible (i.e. hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency) and require long-term monitoring
Immunotherapy toxicitiesOccasional:•Fatigue, headaches, arthralgia, fever, chills•Skin: rash•Asymptomatic lab abnormalities: elevation of LFT’s, amylase/lipase•GI: colitis, pancreatitis, hepatitis•Endocrine: thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, hypophysitis, hypoadrenalism
Rare:•Pulmonary: pneumonitis
Very Rare:•Other organs: kidneys, CNS, muscle, heart, bone marrow•Cytokine release syndrome: fever, hypotension, pulmonary edema, multi-organ failure. Can mimic sepsis.
Kinetics of Appearance of irAEs
Weber et al. JCO 2012
General guidelines:• Low grade toxicities (grade 1-2): observe, hold drug, topical steroids
( Rash – topical hydrocortisone; Diarrhea – budesonide)
• Medium grade toxicities (grade 2-3): hold, oral systemic steroids (prednisone, methylprednisolone), closer monitoring
• High grade toxicities (grade 3-4): admit, IV steroids
• Steroid-refractory toxicities: other immunosuppressant agents (Mycophenolate Mofetil for liver toxicity; Infliximab for other toxicities)
Toxicity Guidelines (non-protocol)• On-line safety tools
– https://www.opdivosafetytool.com
• Multidisciplinary expert panel guidelines – “Management of Immunotherapy Side Effects”– American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National
Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) joint collaboration
Examples of management protocol algorithms (BMS)
Immune-related Adverse Events (irAE)
Pro
port
ion
of
Aff
ecte
d P
atie
nts
Rash/pruritus
PneumonitisMyocarditis, rare neurologic syndromes*, cholangitis*, vasculitis neuropathy*, atrophic exocrine pancreatic
insufficiency*, sclerodermoid reaction*, others…
Figure legend: Approximate proportion of patients affected by immune-related adverse events of any grade upon treatment with single-agent PD-1 blockade.
Endocrinopathies, arthralgia
20%
Diarrhea
Friedman and Snyder, Annals of Oncology, 2017
Rare Side Toxicities: Long Tail of irAE
Results on ECG and Immune Effects in Cardiac Muscle after Treatment with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab
Johnson DB et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1749-1755
Immunotherapy in Older adults: FDA experience
Singh et al, FDA subset analysis of the safety of nivolumab in elderly patients with advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 10010)
- irAE rates similar across age group.- Look at other parameters (which do increase with age)
- drug discontinuation - intervention required
Weber, Immunotherapy: It's Not Getting Old, ASCO 2016
Toxicity • Immunotherapy• PARP inhibitors• VEGF inhibition
FDA approved PARP inhibitorsTreatment
Approval date Rx Indication Data
Olaparib 12/2014 400 mg BID (50 mg CAPSULES)
Deleterious germline BRCA mut ≥3 more priors
Study 42
Rucaparib 12/2016 600 mg BID (200 mg, 300 mg capsules)
Deleterious germline OR somatic BRCA mutation &≥2 more priors
Study 10, ARIEL2
Maintenance
Niraparib 3/2017 300 mg daily (100 mg capsules)
Recurrent ovarian cancer &complete or partial response to platinum based chemotherapy
NOVA
Olaparib 8/2017 300mg BID(150mg, 100mg TABLETS)
Recurrent ovarian cancer &complete or partial response to platinum based chemotherapy
SOLO-2Study 19
Each PARP inhibitor has DIFFERENT properties/indication…PARP inhibitor CYP enzymes used for
metabolismDrug Drug Interactions Effect on renal and hepatic uptake
transporters
Rucaparib1 CYP2D6 (predominant)
CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 (lesser extent)
Reversibly inhibits CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3AInduces CYP1A2
Inhibits MATE1 and MATE2-K (potent), OCT1 (moderate)
Olaparib1 CYP3A4* Inhibits CYP3A4 and induces CYP2B6
Inhibits OATP1B1, OCT1, OCT2, OAT3, MATE1, MATE2K
Niraparib2 CYP3A4/5 and CYP1A2
CYP2D6 (lesser extent) Amide hydrolysis is main hepatic clearance
Can induce CYP1A2 (weak)
No interaction with the major hepatic or renal uptake transporters
1FDA package inserts2niraparib IB
*Reduce dose if strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitorsare co-administered
Slides courtesy of Dr. Ursula Matulonis
GI toxicities are common with all PARP inhibitorsToxicities (%) Grade of Tox Olaparib 1 Rucaparib2 Niraparib3
Nausea All Grades 64 77 73.6
Grade 3 and 4 3 5 3.0
Constipation All 20.65 40 39.8
Grades 3 and 4 0 2 0.5
Vomiting All 43 46 34.3
Grades 3 and 4 4 4 1.9
Decreased appetite All 22 39 25.3
Grades 3 and 4 1 3 0.3
Abdominal pain All 43 32 22.6
Grades 3 and 4 8 3 1.1
Diarrhea All 31 34 19.1
Grades 3 and 4 1 2 0.3
Dyspepsia All 25 104 11.4
Grades 3 and 4 0 <1% 0
Dysgeusia All 215 39 10.1
Grades 3 and 4 0 0.3 0
1FDA insert, 2FDA insert, 3NOVA NEJM 2016, 4Swisher Lancet Onc 2016, 5Ledermann Lancet Oncology 2014
Fatigue is common with all PARP inhibitors
Toxicities (%) Grade of Tox Olaparib 1 Rucaparib2 Niraparib3
Fatigue All Grades 66 77 59.4%
Grade 3 and 4 8 11 8.2%
Insomnia All NR 12% 24.3%
Grades 3 and 4 NR 0 0.3%
Headaches All Grades 255 174 25.9
Grades 3 and 4 0 04 0.3
1FDA insert, 2FDA insert, 3NOVA NEJM 2016, 4Swisher Lancet Onc 2016 5Ledermann Lancet Oncology 2014
Hematologic toxicities
Toxicities Grade of Tox Olaparib1 Rucaparib2 Niraparib3
Decrease in hemoglobin All Grades 90 67 50.1
Grade 3 and 4 15 23 25.3
Decrease in platelets All 30 39 61.3
Grades 3 and 4 3 6 33.8
Decrease in neutrophil count
All 25 35 30.2
Grades 3 and 4 7 10 19.6
1FDA package insert, 2FDA package insert, 3NOVA NEJM 2016
(% of pts)
Additional toxicities differ between agents
Toxicities Grade of Tox Olaparib1 Rucaparib2 Niraparib3
Increased Creatinine All 30 92% NR
Grades 3 and 4 2 1 NR
Elevated ALT All NR 74% NR
Grades 3 and 4 NR 13% NR
Elevated AST All NR 73% NR
Grades 3 and 4 NR 5% NR
Hypertension All NR NR 19.3%
Grades 3 and 4 NR NR 8.2%
Nasopharyngitis/URI All 26 104 11.2
Grades 3 and 4 0 04 0
Dyspnea All NR 21 19.3
Grades 3 and 4 NR 0.5 1.1
Palpitations All NR NR 10.4
Grades 3 and 4 NR NR 0
1FDA insert, 2FDA insert, 3NOVA NEJM 2016, 4Swisher Lancet Onc 2016 5Ledermann Lancet Oncology 2014
(% of pts)
Other side effects…• Pneumonitis
reported in <1% of pts treated with olaparib• AML/MDS (leukemia, pre-leukemia)
OLAP 0.8% (22/2618)1
Rucaparib 0.5% (2/377)2
Niraparib 1.4% (5/367)3 • Increase in cholesterol
Rucaparib2: 40% all grades; 2% grade 3 and 4• Rash/photosensitivity reaction
Rucaparib: 15%/10% Olaparib: 25%/0
1FDA insert, 2FDA insert, 3NOVA NEJM 2016,
Toxicity • Immunotherapy• PARP inhibitors• VEGF inhibition
Tumor Angiogenesis and Cancer Treatment
Blood vessel
Tumor that can grow and spreadSmall localized tumor
Signaling molecule
Angiogenesis
AURELIA: Bevacizumab for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer.
Stratification factors:
•Chemotherapy selected
•Prior anti-angiogenic therapy
•Treatment-free interval (PFI <3 vs 3 6 months)‒
Platinum-resistant
•≤2 prior regimens
•No history of bowel obstruction/fistula, or clinical/radiological evidence of rectosigmoid involvement
Treat to PD/toxicity
Treat to PD/toxicity
Investigator’s choice
(without BEV)
Optional BEV monotherapy^
BEV 15 mg/kg q3w*
+ chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
R
1:1
Chemotherapy options (investigator’s choice):
•Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 & 22 q4w
•Topotecan 4 mg/m2 days 1, 8 & 15 q4w (or 1.25 mg/m2, days 1–5 q3w)
•PLD 40 mg/m2 day 1 q4w*Or 10 mg/kg q2w^15 mg/kg q3w, permitted on clear evidence of progression
J Clin Oncol 2014;32(13):1302-8
AURELIA
RR Chemo alone
RR Chemo + Bev
Median PFS Chemo alone
(months)
Median PFS Chemo + Bev
(months)
HR Median OSChemo Alone
(months)
Median OS Chemo + Bev
(months)
HR
Overall Study 11.8% 27.3% 3.4 6.7 0.48(0.38-0.60)
13.3 16.6 0.85(0.66-1.08)
Paclitaxel 30.2% 53.3% 3.9 10.4 0.46 (0.30-0.71)
13.2 22.4 0.65 (0.42-1.02)
PLD 7.8% 13.7% 3.5 5.4 0.57 (0.39-0.83)
14.1 13.7 0.91(0.62-1.36)
Topotecan 0% 17% 2.1 5.8 0.32 (0.21-0.49)
13.3 13.8 1.09(0.72-1.67)
J Clin Oncol 2014;32(13):1302-8; J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3836-3838
HFS = hand-foot syndromeaPreferred terms. bIncludes abdominal pain upper
Patie
nts
(%)
Periphera
l senso
ry
neuropath
y
Abdominal pain
b
≈≈≈
≈
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18CT (n=181)
BEV + CT (n=179)
J Clin Oncol 2014;32(13):1302-8
AURELIA: Side effects with addition of Bev to chemotherapy
Older adults: Bevacizumab increases Grade 3-5 toxicity
Mohile, Tew et al. The Oncologist 2013;18:408-414©2013 by AlphaMed Press
Bevacizumab: - Hypertension- Bleed- Clots (arterial, venous)- Proteinuria- Bowel perforation
Phase II: Olaparib (PARPinh)+ Cediranib (Angiogenesis)• Platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer• Median PFS improvement in combo (17.7 vs. 9months)• High toxicity, mostly cediranib related:
– Grade 3-5 AEs (70%): fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension.– Drug dose reduction (77%): mostly cediranib
• Fit, young pt population:– Median age 58 (42-86)– ECOG PS 0 (71%)– ECOG PS 1 (29%)
• NRG studies:– Platinum Sensitive– Platinum Resistant
Liu et al, Lancet Oncol, 2015
Financial Toxicity
Summary• Targeted agents bring unique, yet often manageable side
effects.
• Special attention to drug combinations and populations not studied in prospective studies (elderly)
• With a FDA indication and broader use, very rare side effects can be discovered.