Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?
description
Transcript of Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?
![Page 1: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air
pollution?Yayu Yu
Proposition of Fact SpeechApril 4, 2007
![Page 2: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MY POSITION
I SAY ….
![Page 3: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Longer life expected in rural areas
• Men in Manchester can expect to die 10 years earlier than those born in north Dorset.
![Page 4: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• For men, north Dorset offers the longest average life, at 79.6 years, while in Manchester it goes down to 69.7 years. Liverpool comes third worst, at 72 years.
• For women, north Dorset is the third longest expectancy with 83.4 , Manchester is at 77.6 and 77.1 in Liverpool.
Liverpool
60
65
70
75
80
85
Men Women
North DorsetManchesterLi verpool
![Page 5: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WHY?
![Page 6: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Environmental Factors • the top five world famous longevity regions • the former Soviet Union • Pakistan• Ecuador• Xinjiang• Bama
• Rural Regions• beautiful environment• the appropriate temperature• Mountains• fresh air• clean water in the region
• Cities• industrial wastewater • solid waste emissions
![Page 7: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cleaner Air Linked To Reduced Death Rates
• 1990 coal ban in Dublin • The average concentrations of black
smoke decreased by 70% • Overall decrease in non-trauma
death rate of nearly 6%• Death by respiratory causes
decreased by around 15%• Death by cardiovascular causes by
around 10%• This related to an estimated
reduction of 116 respiratory deaths and 243 cardiovascular deaths every year after the ban was implemented.
![Page 8: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Cleaner Air Linked To Reduced Death Rates
• Traffic-related air pollution and death • 5000 people from the NLCS (age 55-69
years) were studied from 1986 to 1994. • 11% of the study population died during
follow-up• People who lived near a main road were
around twice as likely to die from heart and/or lungs disease and were 1.4 times more likely to die from any cause.
![Page 9: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Air Pollution Linked to Inherited Mutation
• Sooty air pollution can cause genetic damage that can be passed along to offspring.
• Mice that breathed filtered air had mutation rates 52 percent lower than the mice exposed to full strengthen steel mill pollution.
![Page 10: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Breathe Filtered Air
Breathe Outside Air
![Page 11: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Air pollution is expensive• Air pollution reductions are
expensive, costing Americans at least tens of billions of dollars each year. Recently, the EPA implemented tough new standards for ozone and soot that will cost at least an additional $100 billion per year -- or about $1,000 per household -- and the agency plans to clamp down still further in the future.
![Page 12: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• A majority of voters are willing to pay more for programs to protect the country’s air and water supplies.
![Page 13: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Should we pay more [attention and/or money] on air pollution?](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568161ec550346895dd22179/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Conclusion• Next Speech:• What should be done
which has not been done yet?