Shepherdess Walk

download Shepherdess Walk

of 16

Transcript of Shepherdess Walk

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    1/16

    Shepherdess Walk | Daniela God oy, Ma riela

    Go nza lez, William Hunter, Benjamin Lec lair-

    Paquet, Xiaolu Li, Colin Ma ly, Sha ron Tan, Puna m

    Vaja , And rew Wade, Karol Yanez, Zhe Yang

    24.03.2009

    UCL|DPU DEVELOPMENT BRIEF

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    2/16

    DevelopmentPlanningUnit 2

    0.0 CONTENTS

    1.0 Introduction1.1 Terms of Reference 3

    1.2 Setting out the Physical and Socio-Economic Context 3

    1.3Summary of Policy and Planning Framework 42.0 Area Analysis

    2.1Urban Design Characteristics: Shepherdess Walk 52.2 Constraints and Opportunities 6

    3.0 Objectives, Visions, Design Principles, Problematic Elements3.1 Objectives 6

    3.2 Visions 6

    3.3 Design Principles 7

    3.4 Problematic Elements 7

    4.0 Design Interventions4.1 Signage and Way-finding 8

    4.2 Urban Acupuncture 9-10

    4.3 Public Realm 11-14

    5.0 Phasing Strategy5.1 Phasing Plan 15

    5.2 Partnerships 15

    5.3 Development Process 15

    5.4 Delivery mechanism based on cost analysis 15

    6.0 Conclusion 157.0 References 16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    3/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    4/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    5/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    6/16

    DevelopmentPlanningUnit 6

    existing zoning diagram: Shepherdess Walk

    2.2 Constraints and Opportunities

    As per the urban design characteristics presented above, two main constrains havebeen identified. First of all, no clear sings to landmarks or connective paths that help

    the orientation, especially for reaching the main landmarks in the area: Regents Canal

    and Shepherdess Walk Park. Secondly, there is a lack of mixed land uses. Basically

    the area is mostly formed of residential zones and industrial volumes, giving a sense of

    thelack of vitality, isolated areas during different times of the day and the lack of a

    unique neighbourhood character.

    On the other hand, opportunities can be identified. The area has a range of open and

    green spaces and building landscapes. Additionally, the area, specifically Shepherdess

    Walk, accounts as good access to public transport links and it is located very close to

    local amenities such as schools, offices and hospitals.

    3.0 OBJECTIVES, VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES, PROBLEMATIC ELEMENTS3.1 ObjectivesA primary objective of this brief is to create safe routes that are easily navigable. This

    will help the pedestrian to fully utilise and benefit from the existing open spaces in

    Shepherdess Walk. We would also like to see the introduction of multi-functional

    spaces by diversifying building typology and land use. This will serve to animate the

    streetscape through increased commercial activity in a predominately residential area.

    As these businesses would cater locally, they would promote community interaction.

    3.2 VisionOur vision for Shepherdess Walk is one of strong community and dynamic social

    interaction. Local residents will have a vast array of resources within the communitythat are safely and easily accessible to all, while Londoners from other

    neighbourhoods will openly explore the beautiful open spaces of Regents Canal and

    Shepherdess Walk Park. The vibrancy of the creative industries in the neighbourhood

    will be both a point of pride for local residents and a unique means of attracting and

    welcoming visitors.

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    7/16

    DevelopmentPlanningUnit 7comprehensive intervention proposal map diagram

    3.3 Design Principles

    By using the existing strengths of the area as a starting point on which we build ourstrategic interventions, we are also addressing a crosscutting issue that permeates our

    proposal: security. Our localised interventions reach their full transformative potential

    over a variety of time scales, ranging from short-term to long-term. This approach both

    addresses weaknesses in the area and builds upon existing strengths. Orienting our

    design interventions from both of these angles, we provide a very thorough proposal

    for Shepherdess Walk. Furthermore, the design intervention focuses on non-motorized

    interpretation of the city, which fits comfortably with the guidelines of the Local

    Development Framework. The cumulative effect of these principles strengthens a

    sense of community and social interaction.

    3.4 Problematic ElementsThere exists a lack of legibility in the urban environment. Old Street underground

    station and both Shepherdess Walk Park and Shoreditch Park represent important

    nodes of activity for Shoreditch, however the fabric between them doesnt promote

    interaction between these spaces. Increased legibility will both enhance perceived

    security and nurture an appropriate link between these existing nodes. Furthermore,

    the urban form is not reflective of the function and usage of certain streets in the area,

    namely Shepherdess Walk and Murray Grove.

    The second problematic element revolves around the issue of navigability and

    pedestrian isolation from points of interest. As it stands, paths encouraging the

    transition from Shepherdess Walk Park and Regents Canal (located less than 100

    meters away) are nonexistent. This is partly due to the industrial scale and

    configuration of the buildings lining the canal, and its position below street level.

    A further problematic element is the homogenous and stagnant character and function

    of the area. Residents do not benefit from local, service-oriented businesses. InWestern cities, commercial areas serve as spaces of social interaction and community.

    This is an aspect of urban life that is distinctly absent from Shepherdess Walk.

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    8/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    9/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    10/16

    DevelopmentPlanningUnit 10

    Shepherdess Walk is a major penetration link between City Road and Regents Canal

    and therefore is a backbone of the area and essential to its sustained development. In

    order to transform this backbone link, we propose sites of commercial acupuncture.This entails locating buildings and parts of buildings, specifically ground floors that can

    be reclaimed for potential conversion that will promote activity and thus complete a

    coherent link between established commercial realms. The significance of this

    acupuncture is that it will primarily serve those local residents and their everyday

    routines. In a twofold manner it should also provide a more welcoming passage for

    those traveling through the site. If commercial activity emerges in successful ways the

    prevention of criminal activity should be minimized as once empty streets will become

    regularly inhabited throughout the entire day. People will be less isolated behind

    closed doors and start to form relationships, however passive with their neighbors andothers on the street. A relative example to how this is already in play close by; the

    Kingsland Road/A10 corridor. Here a diversity of commercial business combined with

    residential and other typologies create a heterogeneous fabric.

    lone commercial business near Shepherdess Walk

    This photo illustrates how mixed-use can be achieved in residential neighbourhoods. By introducing

    commercial functions on the ground floor of multi-storey residential units, local businesses can change the

    dynamic of the public realm, while offering services to local residents. This can stimulate social exchanges

    within the local community, as commercial strips often double as social arenas in the context of Western cities.

    intervention diagram 1: proposed

    acupuncture sites along Shepherdess Walk

    and the Park perimeter- indicated by the red

    dots

    intervention diagram 1: future potential

    acupuncture sites in the immediate

    surrounding areas- indicated by the

    orange dots

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    11/16

    DevelopmentPlanning

    Unit

    11

    4.3 Public RealmThe public realm intervention will cover proposals for the open spaces networks, safepublic routes and inner-block landscaping.

    diagram showing proposed areas of intervention

    Overall connectivity: Open Spaces Network

    The creation of an overall connectivity of the main open spaces throughout the site willentail the creation of a pattern of landscaping similar to green-corridors These will

    connect Shepherdess Walk Park, Regents Canal, Wenlock Basin, and the other major

    open spaces (e.g Shoreditch Park and Hoxton Square). Through the use of uniform

    landscape design and retaining the individuality of each unique area, locals and other

    Londoners will be able to recognise the uniform high quality of the spaces.

    Ex 1: Canal side development- Carr

    Lodge Farm, Doncaster This

    concept could be replicated for

    Regents Canal, where the functions

    of buildings positioned on either of

    its sides are typologically very

    different. By underlining the

    opportunity that a waterway in the

    middle of a city truly represents, the

    use of landscape can influence the

    orientation of the built environment

    These will be spaces with both soft and hard landscaping. The soft landscaping will be

    low lying, with a range of plant and tree types used (See Example 1). The hard

    landscaping will incorporate street furniture, such as seating and lighting, and

    pavements will be treated with a uniform surface material, all along the network.

    In order to ensure the quality of these spaces is as high as one-another, regular

    maintenance of the spaces is vital. Through necessary upgrading, the level of quality

    of the open spaces will be of the same, high standard. As recognised through the

    analysis, Shoreditch Park has, for instance already undergone an extensive renovation

    process, and parts of development along the canal will mean parts of the canal

    walkway will be newly developed, in comparison to other areas.

    Safe public routes: PedestrianisationThis intervention seeks a more integrative vision of the area and a greater legibility

    through linking the open spaces within a local public realm network . Following this

    objective the first action is to identify a potential system of open spaces located in

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    12/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    13/16

    DevelopmentPlanning

    Unit

    13

    In a book titled Great Streets (1995), Allan B Jacobs identifies resting areas as one key criterion for creating

    successful urban spaces. They can add to the pedestrian experience by adding a new dimension to the

    streetscape, which must offer more than commercial activities and a path for circulation to truly become a great

    street. This sort of resting area contributes to the multidimensionality of a street.

    Ex. 3 - A community led intervention where both access is maintained, and the use of the open space for the

    local residents is enhanced.(Source: Sustrans)

    A. plaza before

    A. plaza after

    The physicality of the public realm should encourage animation and interaction. Although social exchanges

    typically take place on commercial streets in the Western context, they do not have to take place inside the

    businesses themselves. Admittedly, as social or economic status is not a requirement for joining in (Jacobs,

    1995, p. 9), streets ought to be settings for activities that bring people together (Jacobs, 1995, p.8). Placing

    benches or urban furniture can act as catalyst for transforming poorly used sidewalks into lively env ironments.

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    14/16

    DevelopmentPlanning

    Unit

    14

    B. The next inner-block landscaped space is in Blestoe Walk (see images B); avery local space, which is not used for parking, and is not gated or in use for

    anything else. As this will be largely resident led, a possibility is temporarystreet art (see Ex.4 and B, after), which involves the local residents, and were

    there is scope to give a range of ideas a go.

    Blestoe Walk is an example of a poor use of the urban realm as it represents a large hard surface, which serves

    no apparent purpose. In the context of London and its density, such places could be readapted to benefit the

    people of Shoreditch.

    B. Blestoe Walk before

    B. Blestoe Walk after

    Ex.4 Temporary street art (source: Sustrans) Top: Young children paint the street Below: A street-art day

    Not all urban spaces are used throughout the week. This precedent illustrates how a zone which was not used

    during a weekend can be used to host a community street art event which can strengthen a sense of belonging

    while fostering social ties. This use of the public realm could help the people of Shoreditch achieve what they

    cannot achieve alone from a sociological point of view. Furthermore, it could decorate a place, giving it a

    distinct identity.

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    15/16

  • 8/3/2019 Shepherdess Walk

    16/16

    DevelopmentPlanningUnit16

    7.0 REFERENCES

    Development Planning Unit, 2009, Urban analysis, Block Structure, Shoretditch area

    study, University College London

    Development Planning Unit, 2009, Urban analysis, Open space system, Shoretditch

    area study, University College London

    Development Planning Unit, 2009, Urban analysis, Access, Shoretditch area study,

    University College London

    Development Planning Unit, 2009, Urban analysis, Massing/Density, Shoretditch areastudy, University College London

    Development Planning Unit, 2009, Urban analysis, Landmarks, Significant Buildings

    and View Corridors, Shoretditch area study, University College London

    South Shoreditch Supplementary Planning Document, (2006),

    http://www.hackney.gov.uk/ep-planning-policy-spd-sshoreditch.htm (acceded 19-

    march-2009) Page 158.

    Development Plan for London, (2002),

    http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Environment_and_plannin

    g/Planning/Planning_policy/udp_2002.htm (acceded 19-march-2009), Page 18.

    Jacobs, AB 1995, Great Streets, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    London Borough of Hackney website http://www.hackney.gov.uk/xp-factsandfigures

    Lynch, K 1960, The image of the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Open Space Strategy, (2007),

    http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/strategies/sds/open_space.jsp (acceded 10-march-

    2009) Page 59

    Plan Better London, (2008),

    http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/Transport/consultationsandresponses/planningforab

    etterLondon.htm (acceded 19-march-2009) Page 40

    Hackney Local Development Scheme, (2005), http://www.hackney.gov.uk/ep-policy-

    lds.htm (accessed 19-march-2005) Pages 86

    Summary Graph Hackney Local Development Scheme (2005)

    http://www.hackney.gov.uk/ep-policy-lds.htm (accessed 19-march-2005)

    Shoreditch NDC Data

    Ben Smith - Shoreditch Trust Research and Evaluation [email protected]

    Office of National Statistics

    www.statistics.gov.uk