Shenoy n Sandhya

download Shenoy n Sandhya

of 2

Transcript of Shenoy n Sandhya

  • 7/31/2019 Shenoy n Sandhya

    1/2

    Notes & Tips

    Site-directed mutagenesis using a single mutagenic

    oligonucleotide and DpnI digestion of template DNA

    Avinash R. Shenoy and Sandhya S. Visweswariah*

    Department of Molecular Reproduction, Development and Genetics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

    Received 4 April 2003

    Site-directed mutagenesis is used extensively for the

    analysis of gene structure and function, and several

    methods are currently employed to obtain single-base-

    pair changes, deletions, and insertions. Many of these

    procedures require single-stranded DNA as template to

    achieve high levels of efficient mutagenesis [1], though

    recently, the use of double-stranded DNA and PCR-

    based methods have gained popularity, given the ease of

    preparation of the template DNA [2,3]. PCR-based

    approaches require the synthesis of two complimentary

    oligonucleotides that contain the desired mutation(s)

    and these are used to prime the PCR on a plasmid DNA

    template. Subsequent digestion of the reaction mixture

    with DpnI removes the template DNA, leaving intact the

    newly synthesized double-stranded mutant PCR prod-

    uct, which is then used to transform Escherichia coli

    cells. This method allows high-efficiency mutagenesis in

    a fairly short period of time [4]. We have utilized this

    approach for some of our studies, but have made the

    observation that a single mutagenic primer was sufficient

    to generate mutant single-stranded DNA, which could

    then be transformed into E. coli DH10B cells to obtain

    plasmid DNA containing the desired mutation. We de-

    scribe this simplified protocol in this report, whichachieves successful mutation frequencies on par with

    that using two primers (Fig. 1).

    Primers used for the mutagenesis were designed such

    that the mutation (in some cases 2 basepairs not neces-

    sarily adjacent to each other) lay in the middle of the

    oligonucleotide with sufficient flanking residues (912

    basepairs) to allow a Tm close to 78 C. The formula

    used for calculation of the Tm is Tm 81:5

    0:41%GC 675=N % mismatch, where N is theprimer length.

    Since only a single primer is used during the muta-

    genesis reaction, the primer can be of sufficient length to

    achieve a high Tm, since no self-annealed primers can

    form during the annealing and DNA synthesis steps.

    For example, we have used a 41-mer primer very suc-

    cessfully during mutagenesis of AT-rich sequences in the

    human guanylyl cyclase C cDNA to bring in 2 basepair

    changes separated by 11 bases. In addition, highly GC-

    rich sequences, such as those present in Mycobacterium

    tuberculosis genes, were successfully mutated using

    shorter 25-mer primers.

    The conditions used for PCR are as follows, in a total

    volume of 50 ll: template DNA, 100 ng; mutagenic pri-

    mer, 20 pmol; thermostable polymerase buffer (10),5ll; dNTPs, 0.6 ll of a solution containing 25 mM of

    each dNTP; and polymerase, 2.5 U.

    We have used proof-reading thermostable polyme-

    rases, such as Pfu and Turbo Pfu (Strategene, USA), for

    the synthesis of long plasmids. There will be no ampli-

    fication of DNA during the mutagenesis procedure,

    since only a single primer is used. Primers have been

    used as supplied by the manufacturer with no gel puri-fication or phosphorylation required.

    The conditions for the synthesis of the mutant DNA

    strand is based on the annealing temperature of the

    primer and may require some modifications to the

    conditions that we describe here. The tube is initially

    taken to 96 C for 2 min, and then 18 cycles consisting of

    1 min at 96 C, an annealing step at a temperature

    suitable for the primer (can be 4055 C), and an ex-

    tension step at 68 C, where the extension time in min is

    2 length of plasmid in kb, are performed. At the end ofthis step, the tube is held at 68 C for 20 min and then at

    4 C indefinitely if required.

    Analytical Biochemistry 319 (2003) 335336

    www.elsevier.com/locate/yabio

    ANALYTICAL

    BIOCHEMISTRY

    * Corresponding author. Fax: +91-80-3600999.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (S.S. Visweswariah).

    0003-2697/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/S0003-2697(03)00286-0

    http://mail%20to:%[email protected]/http://mail%20to:%[email protected]/http://mail%20to:%[email protected]/
  • 7/31/2019 Shenoy n Sandhya

    2/2

    DpnI is then added directly to the reaction tube (1 ll

    equivalent to 10 U). The buffer conditions in the tube aresuch that DpnI digestion can occur, and in the low

    concentrations of salt that are present in the tube, both

    methylated (parent) and hemimethylated DNA will be

    digested. Digestion with DpnI can be performed for long

    periods of time if necessary, though we usually find that

    46 h is adequate. Following the digestion of templateDNA, 10ll of the reaction mixture is directly trans-

    formed into chemically competent DH10B cells (effi-

    ciency > 106=lg plasmid DNA) and transformants arechecked for the presence of the mutation by sequencing

    and restriction digestion if a suitable site was introduced

    during the mutagenesis reaction.A control reaction can be set up where all compo-

    nents of the reaction are added except the polymerase.

    This reaction on transformation should give no colonies

    on the plate, and with adequate DpnI digestion, this is

    found to be the case. Transformation of the mutagenesis

    reaction can give up to 100 colonies. We usually screen 5

    colonies for the presence of the mutation, and on aver-

    age, we have achieved mutation efficiencies of 6090%

    using this method.

    As mentioned above, we have used this approach to

    mutagenize genes which were more than 70% GC-rich,

    with no requirement for addition of dimethyl sulfoxide

    during the reaction. We have used annealing tempera-

    tures as low as 40 C, with some problematic primers,

    and in fact, lowering of the temperature does not appear

    to appreciably reduce the efficiency of mutagenesis. Theselection of the host strain used for transformation ap-

    pears to be important, and our most efficient mutagen-esis has been obtained when DH10B or DH5a cells were

    used. We did not achieve high mutation frequencies

    using TOP10 cells (Invitrogen) but cannot provide an

    explanation for this at this time, given the similar ge-

    notypes of the two strains. Our approach requires the

    efficient transformation of single-stranded DNA, and

    perhaps strain-to-strain variation is seen. In general,

    mutagenesis performed on a fragment of the gene of

    interest, followed by subcloning back into the full-length

    gene, would reduce the chance of random mutation inother regions of the template during the mutagenesis

    step. We usually sequence the entire fragment used for

    mutagenesis to check for mutations in sequences other

    than that brought in with the primer.

    In summary, we describe here a protocol for the ef-

    ficient mutagenesis of DNA using only a single muta-

    genic oligonucleotide and incorporating the step of DpnI

    digestion to reduce the number of nonmutagenized

    colonies obtained after transformation. The procedure

    works well for GC-rich DNA and allows the incorpo-

    ration of two mutations in a single oligonucleotide, as

    long as the Tm of the oligonucleotide is high. We rou-

    tinely adopt this procedure in the laboratory at present

    with high success.

    Acknowledgments

    Financial assistance from the Department of Bio-

    technology, Government of India is acknowledged.

    References

    [1] T.A. Kunkel, J.D. Roberts, R.A. Zakour, Rapid and efficient

    site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection, Methods

    Enzymol. 154 (1987) 357382.

    [2] W.P. Deng, J.A. Nickoloff, Site-directed mutagenesis of virtually

    any plasmid by eliminating a unique site, Anal. Biochem. 200

    (1992) 8188.

    [3] S. Barik, Site-directed mutagenesis in vitro by megaprimer PCR,

    Methods Mol. Biol. 57 (1996) 203215.

    [4] S. Li, M.F. Wilkinson, Site-directed mutagenesis: a two-step

    method using PCR and DpnI, Biotechniques 23 (1997) 588590.

    Fig. 1. Schematic of the mutagenesis protocol. PCR is carried out as

    described and a single-stranded nicked DNA molecule containing the

    desired mutation is left at the end of the reaction following digestion

    with DpnI. This is transformed into competent DH10B cells to obtain

    plasmid DNA with the desired mutation.

    336 Notes & Tips / Analytical Biochemistry 319 (2003) 335336