Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

71
Conducting Observations: PSU Supervisor Training Teaching Expectations and Providing Positive and Corrective Feedback Sheldon Loman, PhD [email protected] Office: (503) 725-5939 Materials available at: http://psusupervisor.pbworks.c om / 1

description

Conducting Observations: PSU Supervisor Training Teaching Expectations and Providing Positive and Corrective Feedback. Sheldon Loman, PhD [email protected] Office: (503) 725-5939 Materials available at: http://psusupervisor.pbworks.com/. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Page 1: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Conducting Observations: PSU Supervisor TrainingTeaching Expectations and Providing Positive and Corrective Feedback

Sheldon Loman, [email protected]: (503) 725-5939

Materials available at: http://psusupervisor.pbworks.com/

1

Page 2: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

2

“Clearing a path for people with special needs clears the path for

everyone!”

Page 3: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Person-First Language Emphasize the use of person-first language

Examples: Student with cerebral palsy Young man in Ms. Lee’s class Young woman with communicative difficulties Jason Yesenia

Non-examples: Life Skills Student Low-functioning autistic kid Physically handicapped girl

3

Page 4: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

High Expectations for Students

Encourage teacher candidates to hold high expectations for students.

Emphasize the use of student preferences and choice.

Promotion of independence, decision-making…. Self-determination.

4

Page 5: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Steps in Ecological Assessment Process

• Step 1: Plan with Student & Family • Person-centered Planning

• Step 2: Summarize what is known about the student• Record Review, IEP Review

• Step 3: Encourage Self-Determination/ Assess Student Preferences• Preference Assessment

• Step 4: Assess student’s instructional program• Daily Schedule Analysis• Task Analyses• Other Assessments

• Step 5: Develop ecological assessment report• To inform IEP: PLAAFP, Goals & Objectives, Interventions

Page 6: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Planning Alternative Tomorrows with Hope (PATH)

http://www.inclusive-solutions.com/pcplanning.asp

Page 7: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Loman et al., 2010

Page 8: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Preference Assessments• Why are preference assessments so important?

• Want to be seen as the “giver of good things”

• Natural consequences may not be reinforcing to the learner.

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBuTHzWvN8I

Page 9: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Form 5.2

Page 10: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Forced Choice Form 5.3

Page 11: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Qualities of a Well-Designed Standards-Based IEP

(modified from Wakeman et al., 2010)

Page 12: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 13: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

+Daily Schedule Analysis

Page 14: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

+

Page 15: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 16: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 17: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 18: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Steps in Ecological Assessment Process

• Step 1: Plan with Student & Family • Person-centered Planning

• Step 2: Summarize what is known about the student• Record Review, IEP Review

• Step 3: Encourage Self-Determination/ Assess Student Preferences• Preference Assessment

• Step 4: Assess student’s instructional program• Daily Schedule Analysis• Task Analyses• Other Assessments

• Step 5: Develop ecological assessment report• To inform IEP: PLAAFP, Goals & Objectives, Interventions

Page 19: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Antecedent Strategies

-Time Delay

-Prompting

-Pre-correction

-Modeling

Instructional Design

-Range of Responses-Range of Examples-Positive Examples-Negative Examples-Minimally Different-Maximally Different

Consequence Strategies

-Differential Reinforcement

-Shaping

-Error Correction

Page 20: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Functional Routines InstructionCue(opportunity to respond)

Response/Behavior

Consequence Pause

FR Environment provides a natural cue

Student does each step needed to complete the activity

Student gets natural outcome of activity

Student focuses on next routine

EX Student’s bus arrives and door opens.

Other students get off bus

S gets off bus, goes in the correct direction, enters building, goes to class, puts away materials

Student is now inside with other students and has inviting activities to do. Teacher offers praise

Student transitions to next routine

Page 21: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Teaching Routines• Forward Chaining

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMVZQICUhAk

• Backward Chaining• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbBj4Tzi9CQ

Page 22: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Conducting Observations: Agenda Review: observation process Self Assessment Using the observation forms across a range of

students’ abilities

22

Page 23: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

The goals: Consistent feedback across supervisors and students

Feedback references evidence based practices and coursework

Quantitative and qualitative data on evidence-based practices for each student

Complete three formal observations during the term for each student with this form

23

Page 24: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Supervision process: prior to the observation Teacher candidates should:

Schedule the observation for a time when the candidate is teaching (for functional this may also be an assessment activity for the first observation)

Send you the pre-observation form & lesson plan 24 hours in advance electronically

Have the lesson plan and pre-observation form ready for you in the supervision binder

Have the practicum notebook ready for review at the observation

24

Page 25: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

1st “Lesson Plan”/Instructional Assessment Plan the student will submit will be their Ecological Inventory or Daily Schedule Analysis

25

Page 26: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

2nd “Lesson Plan”

Task Analysis and/or Instructional Plan

26

Page 27: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 28: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

3rd “Lesson Plan” will be their instructional plan http://functionalworksample.pbworks.com/w/f

ile/fetch/49653035/Instructional%20Plan%20Example%20for%20Work%20Sample.pdf

28

Page 29: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Observation form

Competencies 15 qualitative items Room for 3 individual targets selected by

teacher candidate or supervisor Quantitative data

Positive to Corrective Opportunities to Respond

Partner Group Individual

29

Page 30: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Levels of Observation

Level 1: usually first observation for a new teacher candidate If all Level 1 items are 2-3, then move on to Level 2

items (giving feedback on both Levels 1 & 2) If all Level 2 items are 2-3, then move on to Level 3

items (giving feedback on Levels 1, 2, & 3)

The goal is to provide feedback at the teacher candidates level of learning

For student teachers, you may start doing all three levels at once: 1, 2, & 3

30

Page 31: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Supervision process and form

1. Review Practicum Notebook (behavior management plan, data section, pre-observation form, lesson plan with correctly written objectives)

2. Conduct Observation 2-5 minutes qualitative items (competencies) 5 minutes quantitative data (pick level 1 or 2/3) Open observation Last 2-5 minutes qualitative items

3. Debrief with Teacher Candidates Feedback on lesson plan & data Student self evaluation Positive feedback (keepers) Targets for continuing development (polishers)

31

Page 32: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Varied teaching arrangements

We want to see teacher candidates not only using published curriculum teaching discrete skills (one-step skills- matching numbers, sounds, etc.) E.g., STAR, Edmark, Early Literacy Skills Builder

Want to see teacher candidates facilitating student interactions with peers.

Want to see teacher candidates teaching multiple-step tasks/routines (e.g., putting away materials, organizing notebook, washing hands, etc.)

32

Page 33: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Competencies

1: Not yet in place Does not implement or implements ineffectively

2: Attempts to Implement Attempts implementation or is partially effective

3: Implements Effectively Effectively implements sometimes, but not

consistent 4: Implements Consistently & Effectively

Consistently and effectively implements

33

Page 34: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Self Assessment of Teacher Candidate Competencies

Rate to what extent you believe you are able to recognize the following items in your observation of teacher candidates + I feel comfortable evaluating this item +/- I have some idea about what this looks like - I have questions about what this looks like or I

don’t know what this would look like Star the two that you feel the most confident about Circle the two you have the most questions about (We’ll ask you to turn this in to inform later trainings)

34

Page 35: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Routine1. 2. 3. 4.5.

35

Performance Level/Ability

Age

Ran

geE

lem

enta

ryS

econ

dary

Low Inc Hi Inc

What might this look like? Followed curriculum prompting protocols/instructional plan

The teacher candidate is usingReading Mastery, and is readingfrom the scripted lesson plan, using signaling to elicit unisonoral responses, and using allparts of the lesson materials, which is reflected in lesson plansand lesson materials.

The teacher candidate is using the lesson plan and lesson activities are related to thelesson objectiveand stated on the lesson plan.

The teacher candidate is working from their assessmentplan and using response options(e.g. asking the student to point to a real object to assess vocabularyknowledge) that are described in plan

The teacher candidate is working from their instructional plan and using the prompting protocols (e.g., verbal prompts) described in the plan

Page 36: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Routine1. 2. 3. 4.5.

36

Performance Level/Ability

Age

Ran

geE

lem

enta

ryS

econ

dary

Low Inc Hi IncYour turn: What does “implements consistently & effectively” look like? _________________________

Hi Inc. Elementary: What does the Teacher candidate do to “implement consistently and effectively” for students with high incidence ability at elementary level?

Hi Inc. Secondary: What does the Teacher candidate do to “implement consistently and effectively” for students with high incidence ability at secondary level?

Low Inc. Secondary: What does the Teacher candidate do to “implement consistently and effectively” for students with low incidence ability at secondary level?

Low Inc. Elementary: What does the Teacher candidate do to “implement consistently and effectively” for students with low incidence ability at elementary level?

Page 37: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Teaching School Rules: Token ChartStudents earn tokens for following classroom rules and then get to pick from the treasure box

Page 38: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Example of Teaching School Rules

Page 39: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Debrief

Partners: Share the two items you starred and the two

items you circled Help one another clarify questions about

circled items Share out:

Whip around- Share one item your partnership felt firm about,

and one item about which you have questions

39

Page 40: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Take a look at your observation form to find this section.

Page 41: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Opportunity to Respond: Mark a tally in this box when the teacher provides a request that requires a student response

Page 42: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

OTRs…what you want to see….

Fast paced instruction…high OTRs

Page 43: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Calculating Totals of Columns

Page 44: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Partner: Record in these rows when teacher candidate is making a request of students that are working with another student

Page 45: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Group: Record in these rows when teacher is making a request of 2 or more students

Page 46: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Individual: Record using this row when teacher is making a request of only one student.

Page 47: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Calculating Total OTR of Rows

Page 48: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Page 3 on Observation Form

Total of Partner & Group OTR divided by Total OTR

48

Page 49: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Correct: Mark a tally in this box when the student responds correctly (or at the prompt level outlined) to a teacher’s request

Page 50: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Incorrect: Mark a tally in this box if the student did not respond correctly to teacher’s requests

Page 51: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Teacher Correction: Mark a tally here if a teacher provides feedback on target skill.

Page 52: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Teacher Correction: Mark a tally here if a teacher provides feedback on target skill. We expect the teacher to

quickly provide another opportunity for the student to respond to get this request correct (even with more intrusive prompting).

We want student to end teaching session with success and not an error.

Page 53: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Correct responses…what you want to see….

Greater than 80% of OTRs with Correct Responses

Page 54: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Incorrect/Teacher Correctionswhat you want to see….

Every incorrect response with a teacher correction

Page 55: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Calculating Totals of Columns

Page 56: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Page 3 on Observation Form

Percent Correct Responses= Correct over Total OTR

56

Page 57: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Your Turn

Observe instruction Task: Folding Envelopes Starting Cue: “Please fold the envelopes”

57

Page 58: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

58

Page 59: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Qualitative Data Collection (on back or second page)

59

Page 60: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Take data: OTRs, Correct, & Incorrect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_cja5FtoaM

Provide student-focused feedback 1st write it using keeper/polisher feedback Practice delivering feedback with partner

60

Page 61: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Providing Feedback

Student Reflection Positive Comments (e.g. 3 Keepers)

The students (desirable student behavior) because you (teacher behavior)

Student focused “Polisher” (3:1 ratio) It is important that students (desirable student

behavior). In order to do that, you might try (teacher behavior)

61

Page 62: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Your Turn Providing Feedback

With a partner: 1 person shares feedback with the other as if you were the teacher

Thank you 3 Keepers

The students (desirable student behavior) because you (teacher behavior)

1 Polisher It is important that students (desirable student

behavior). In order to do that, you might try (teacher behavior).

62

Page 63: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Example: Keepers and Polisher

Keepers/positive

The students were successful because you modeled how to sound out the words before asking them to read them.

The students stayed on task because you gave students frequent positive feedback on their correct academic responding.

All of the students had many opportunities to practice because you used unison oral responding

Polisher/corrective

It’s important that every student gets a chance to answer, and during the fluency building activity, some students did not answer on signal. In order to do that, you might try giving more think time before asking for a response.

63

Page 64: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Positive to Corrective Ratio Positive feedback

an item that contains a positive evaluative term like (e.g. good, well done) Acknowledgement of appropriate SOCIAL behaviors (e.g., I see Jorge is

waiting quietly). Non example – repeating answer with no indication of correctness,

verifying academic responses (e.g. “Yes, /a/.”) Corrective feedback

an item that contains a negative or corrective evaluative term or negative tone (e.g. stop talking)

Acknowledgement or correction of inappropriate SOCIAL behaviors, (e.g. that’s a teacher point for not following directions)

Non-example Repeating the prompt (put your pencils down… put your pencils down)

OR corrections of academic responses.

Practice Coding:

64

Page 65: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Page 3 on Observation Form

Ratios from Positive to Corrective Total of Partner & Group OTR divided by Total OTR Percent Correct Responses= Correct over Total OTR

65

Page 66: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Deepening Prior Knowledge: using observation forms across a range of students’ abilities

In 3 groups: Select the item you think might be most difficult

to know if it was implemented appropriately. (2 minutes)

As a group, create a matrix that helps address one example of successful implementation. (5 minutes)

66

Page 67: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Functional Work Sample Evaluation 7 sections

Context Goals Instructional Plan Data on Learning Gains Interpretation/Explanation of Data Uses of Data Presentation

67

Page 68: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Section One- Context

Teacher Candidate (TC) selects a focus student with needs in the areas of: Academics, Communication, and Daily Living Skills

TC describes school-wide practices in supporting students with low-incidence disabilities. Universal Design for Learning, Positive

Behavioral Supports, Response to Intervention

68

Page 69: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939

Assessments in Section One

File Review Direct Observation of Focus Student for at

Least Two One Hour Blocks of Time Summary of student’s daily schedule

Opportunities for participation in general education while working towards IEP goals

Preference Assessment One of the Following Areas:

Communication, Academic, Social Skills Conduct Task Analyses for 2 Routines

69

Page 70: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939
Page 71: Sheldon Loman, PhD sheldon.loman@pdx Office: (503) 725-5939