Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

77
Dr. Michael Power Faculty of Education Laval University Leveraging Dual-mode University Strengths to Expand Outreach *

description

This talk is about the need for dual-mode universities (or DMUs), which offer both on-campus and online learning (OL) opportunities, to leverage its main strength in online course delivery, i.e. faculty, rather than trying to reproduce the single-mode university (SMUs) strength which is industrial-based, upfront course design, judged to be too labour-intensive and too costly for most DMUs. Furthermore, it is posited that the DMU’s true niche is graduate studies in OL, an area where SMU simply cannot compete given human resource shortages.

Transcript of Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Page 1: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Dr. Michael Power

Faculty of Education

Laval University

Leveraging Dual-mode University Strengths to Expand Outreach

*

Page 2: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/societe/2012/04/21/002-personnalites-declaration-greve-etudiante.shtml

The educational climate

is changing

Page 3: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

QUEBEC

• violent protests on April 20, 2012

• (Students warn that) future protests over a proposed tuition hike will become “a little more ferocious.”

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/20/analysis-striking-quebec-students-given-a-free-pass-on-violence/

The educational climateis changing

Page 4: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://tinyurl.com/88gzj5g

The educational climate is changing

Page 5: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.flickr.com/photos/webmonk/1470292918/needle-exchange.ca

The classroom has changed too…

Page 6: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.flickr.com/photos/webmonk/1470292918/needle-exchange.ca

The classroom has changed too…

Just try competing with

Page 7: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/

TheFutureofOnlineTeachingandLe/157426

And Online Learning is changing

Page 8: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/

TheFutureofOnlineTeachingandLe/157426

bored students are dropping out of online classes while pleading

for richer and more engaging online learning experiences…

during the past decade, excitement and enthusiasm for e-

learning alternate with a pervasive sense of e-learning gloom,

disappointment, bankruptcy and lawsuits

Page 9: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

despite lingering faculty concerns about the project and against the advice of the Academic Council and a Senate Advisory Council to slow down.

UCOP is moving ahead with “Wave II” of the UC Online Instruction Pilot Project (OIPP)…

Many faculty are confused… faculty also worry that UCOE will benefit only those students who can afford to pay up to $1,400 per course

Online Learning - UCAL 2012http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/onlineeducation.march2012.html

Page 10: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• The specter and promise of online education is perhaps nowhere more deeply felt than in California, where campus administrators and instructors are faced with a bloodletting.

Oct. 12, 2011

• University of California … the system will have to innovate out of the current financial crisis by expanding online programs.

• Instructors, meanwhile, are terrified that this is code for cutting their pay, or increasing their workloads, or outsourcing their jobs to interlopers, or replacing them with online teaching software.

Page 11: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

www.obhe.ac.uk

Page 12: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://www.obhe.ac.uk/resources/2008_AUA_Presentation.pdfDon Olcott CE OBHE

THE GAP

Page 13: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

OBHE –Olcott/Hanna

Rosovsky (2005):

“By 2010, there will be a hundred million in the

world fully qualified to proceed from

secondary education to tertiary education for

which there will simply be no room on any

campus anywhere”.

OBHE –Olcott/Hanna

Page 14: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

www.elcolmadito.com/Arte/MasProductos/PerezCafetera_3_2.jpgwww.dreamstime.com

BOTTLENECK

IN SUPPLY

of Higher

Education

DEMAND

SUPPLY

Page 15: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Teacher Education (09-10)

“It is now clear that “bricks and mortar” approaches to expanding teacher education may not be adequate if the current and projected shortfalls in teacher supply and low teacher quality are to be properly addressed”.

INCREASING DEMAND

Page 16: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

INCREASING DEMAND

www.ifadem.org

« By 2015, more than 3,800,000 teacherswill be needed in Sub-Saharan Africa …»Agence universitaire francophone (AUF) (2011). UNESCO Brief.

Page 17: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Healthcare Training

INCREASING DEMAND

Page 18: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

BusinessEducation

INCREASING DEMAND

Page 19: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

An elusive resource

Ph. D.

Page 20: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25929&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

MEETING INCREASING DEMAND

Page 21: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25929&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

…every four years, the amountof information doubles in the world …

Page 22: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25929&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

…every four years, the amountof information doubles in the world …

…we estimate that, by the year 2020, it will double every 73 days!

What will the impact beon ONLINE LEARNING?

Page 23: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Power & Morven-Gould (2011). www.irrodl.org

Page 24: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

COSTCOST

ACCESS ACCESS QUALITYQUALITY

Desired StateCurrent

State

Optimizing Higher Education

Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf

Page 25: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Increase Access?

COST

ACCESS QUALITY

CurrentState

Source: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Daniel_0411AAOUShanghai.pdf

IRONTRIANGLE

Page 26: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

COST

ACCESS QUALITYIRON

TRIANGLE

Increase Access?= Cost increases & Quality decreases

Not a solution

Page 27: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

IRONTRIANGLE

Increase Quality?

COST

ACCESS QUALITY

= Cost increases & Access decreases

Not a solution

Page 28: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

IRONTRIANGLE

Decrease COST?

COST

ACCESS QUALITY

= Quality & Access decrease

Not a solution

Page 29: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

HOW CAN WE BREAK OUT OF THE “IRON TRIANGLE”?

COST

ACCESS QUALITY

Page 30: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

HOW CAN WE BREAK OUT OF THE “IRON TRIANGLE”?

COST

ACCESS QUALITY

Daniel’s basic argument: Distance-education universities alone

can enable us to break out of the Iron Triangle

Not a solutionFOR DUAL-MODE

UNIVERSITIES

Page 31: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

The dual-mode university

TeachingOn-site

Teaching On-line

campus

Page 32: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

OBSERVATIONS

1. Standards of quality highly variable, extreme example: “diploma mills” (Noble, 1998; Magnussen, 2005);

2. Demand increasing for higher education worldwide yet access is limited (Daniel, 2007; Rosovsky, 2005);

3. Costs spiraling out of control (Ucal, 2010) whileeffectiveness questioned (Brown, 2008; Fink, 2005).

Page 33: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

QUESTIONS

1. QUALITY? (high number of adjunct faculty… is there level of commitment to quality optimal?)

2. ACCESSIBLE? (EX. Blended Learning… what about the distant learner?)

3. COST-EFFECTIVE? (A lot of OL is based on “pay-as-you go” Continuing Ed. model… costs have to be kept low … but is it effective? Are students simply buying their diploma?)

Page 34: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

GOALS

1. Maintaining, even improving upon, QUALITY (at least, based on campus benchmarks);

2. Increasing ACCESSIBILITY (opening up HE to students wherever they live, Stanford prof);

3. Increasing COST-EFFECTIVENESS (making universities responsible for cost overruns while maintaining academic freedom and working conditions; achieving faculty “buy-in”).

Page 35: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

djibnet.com

QUALITY

ACCESS

COST-EFFECTIVENESS

Page 36: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

djibnet.com

QUALITY

ACCESS

COST-EFFECTIVENESS

RESIGNATION

Page 37: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

LECTURING in the classroom…

LECTURING via videoconferencing…

© M. Power 2008

To LECTURING online (SyncDesktopConf)

University Teaching:

a synchronous,human resource-based tradition

Traditional Higher Education

Page 38: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

From correspondence courses,

To multimedia courses,

To online courses

© M. Power 2008

Distance Education: an asynchronous,

learning resource–based tradition

University Distance Education (DE)

Page 39: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

DIALOGUESTRUCTURE

© M. Power, 2012

• BASED ON MOORE’S TRANSACTIONAL DISTANCE THEORY (1973, 1993);• Moore & Kearsley (2012)

a synchronous, human resource-based tradition

an asynchronous, learning resource–

based tradition

Page 40: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRAD

TRADITIONAL UNIVERSITIES

SETPLACE

(ON CAMPUS)

SETTIME

Cohorts

Paced

DIALOGUE-BASED

© M. Power, 2012

SINCE THE 13TH CENTURY

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 41: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRAD

ANYTIME

ANYWHERE

DISTANCE EDUCATION UNIVERSITIES OPEN/TÉLUQ/ATHABASCA

Individuals

Unpaced

STRUCTURE-BASED

DE

© M. Power, 2012

GEN. 1: SINCE 1858 -University of LondonGEN. 2: SINCE 1969 - OPEN UGEN. 3: SINCE 1980s – start of CBT

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 42: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRADDE

© M. Power, 2012

OFF-CAMPUS COURSES SET TIME & SET PLACE

(OFTEN on SATELLITE CAMPUSES)

MOBILE FACULTY

TRADITIONAL UNIVERSITIES

SINCE 1960s… In North American universities

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 43: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRADDE

© M. Power, 2012

VC

VIDEOCONFERENCINGSET TIME & SET PLACE

(on SATELLITE CAMPUSES)

REMOTE CLASSROOM

(THE DUAL-MODE UNIVERSITY EMERGES)

TRADITIONAL UNIVERSITIES

SINCE 1970-80s In North American universities

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 44: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRAD

DISTANCE EDUCATION UNIVERSITIES

TRANSITION FROM DE TO ONLINE LEARNING

Individual

Unpaced

DE OL

ANYTIME

ANYWHERE

© M. Power, 2012

VC

SINCE mid-1980s

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 45: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRAD

DUAL-MODE UNIVERSITY TRANSITION

FROM VC TO ONLINE LEARNING

Cohorts

Paced

DE OL

ANYTIME/ANYWHERE

© M. Power, 2012

VC

FORUM-BASED

OL

SINCE 1990s In North American universities

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 46: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADTRADDE OL

© M. Power, 2012

VCOLBL

Courses• 50% (+/-) on campus• 50% (+/-) online

SET TIME &FLEXIBLE TIME

DUAL-MODE UNIVERSITY TRANSITION

FROM OL TO BLENDED LEARNING

SINCE 2000s In North American universities

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 47: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADDE OL VCOLBL

NEW MODEL PROPOSED

© M. Power, 2012

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

TRAD

Page 48: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADDE

Courses • 50% online in synchronous mode• 50% online in asynchronous mode

DUAL-MODE UNIVERSITY TRANSITION

FROM OL TO BL TO BLENDED ONLINE LEARNING DESIGN

SINCE 2000s in North American universities

SYNC: SET TIME / ASYNCH: ANYTIME

100% ONLINE

TRADOL VCOLBL

© M. Power, 2012

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

BOLD

Page 49: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TRADDE

Courses • 50% online in synchronous mode• 50% online in asynchronous mode

DUAL-MODE UNIVERSITY TRANSITION

FROM BL TO BLENDED ONLINE LEARNING DESIGN

SINCE 2000s in North American universities

SYNC: SET TIME / ASYNCH: ANYTIME

100% ONLINE

TRADOL VCOLBLBOLD

© M. Power, 2012

BOLD- A combined-

technology approach;

- A hybrid model positioned between OL & BL;

- Spatial freedom, but not temporal;

- Set time (synch);- Cohort-based;- Virtual classroom-

based;- Community of

learning-based.© M. Power, 2012

UNIVERSITY OUTREACH STRATEGIES

Page 50: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

© M. Power 2008

+

SYNCHRONOUS ASYNCHRONOUS

COURSE ACCESS

Blended Online Learning Design (BOLD): two traditions meet

Page 51: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

A Virtual Classroom

Facultymember

SYNCHRONOUS

A virtual classroom

A community of inquiry approach

Page 52: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

TEN-7019

From Distance Education to Online Learning

SyllabusStudy Guide Quiz

Resources Forum Email

Assignment

Drop

My Results Virtual Classroom

A Basic Web Site

ASYNCHRONOUS

Page 53: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

A typical BOLD graduate seminar

1

2

3

Page 54: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

© M. Power 2008

ASYNCHRONOUS

Page 55: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

© M. Power 2008

ASYNCHRONOUS

ASYNCHRONOUS and/orSYNCHRONOUS

Page 56: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

© M. Power 2008

ASYNCHRONOUS

ASYNCHRONOUS and/orSYNCHRONOUS

SYNCHRONOUS

Page 57: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

© M. Power 2008

Page 58: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

ONLINE LEARNING &GRADUATESTUDIES

booleanblackbelt.com

Page 59: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;• Universities needing to increase recruitment options;

booleanblackbelt.com

Page 60: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;• Universities needing to increase recruitment options;• Graduate students often workplace professionals;• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);

= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;

booleanblackbelt.com

Page 61: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;• Universities need to increase recruitment options;• Graduate students often workplace professionals;• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);

= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;

booleanblackbelt.com

COMBINING SYNCH & ASYNCH MODES

Page 62: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• Universities struggling to maintain some grad. programs;• Universities need to increase recruitment options;• Graduate students often workplace professionals;• Usually highly motivated and autonomous;• Accustomed to learning via technology & networking;• Small numbers involved (maximum 25 per class);

= Allows for the use of synchronous technology;

• Quality dialogue (leveraging a faculty strength);• Higher accessibility (completely online);• High cost-effectiveness (many costs offset; lower front-

end design; faster faculty online migration; flexibility).

COMBINING SYNCH & ASYNCH MODES

Page 63: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Why now?

highspeedinternetworld.com

Page 64: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

Why now?

highspeedinternetworld.com

• Excellent Bandwidth speeds; Quebec, Canada envied;

• Cost of computers plummeting (Moore’s law);

• Spontaneous and instantaneous communications; huge benefit of instant feedback(Paloff & Pratt);

• Interactivity, key to sustainable e-learning environments (Rosenberg, 2001, 2006)

• The Internet generation (the Millennials are coming)…

Page 65: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://sites.google.com/site/changchienlily/BlankWorldMap.gif

WORLDWIDE RESEARCH NETWORKS

an academic necessity in the 21st century

REALITY

http://sites.google.com/site/changchienlily/BlankWorldMap.gif

Page 66: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

http://sites.google.com/site/changchienlily/BlankWorldMap.gif

WORLDWIDE GRADUATE PROGRAMS

RESEARCH CENTERS

GRADUATE PROGRAMS&

LIKELIHOOD:

Page 67: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time, same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end design, faster start-up =

Does BOLD deliver the goods?

http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg

• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher interaction & lower isolation levels =

higher faculty buy-in;

lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;

• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up

• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;

• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or avoided=higher effectiveness (outreach) without

greater cost

Page 68: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time, same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end design, faster start-up =

Does BOLD deliver the goods?

http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg

• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher interaction & lower isolation levels =

higher faculty buy-in;

lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;

• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up

• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;

• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or avoided=higher effectiveness (outreach) without

greater cost

Page 69: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time, same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end design, faster start-up =

Does BOLD deliver the goods?

http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg

• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher interaction & lower isolation levels =

higher faculty buy-in;

lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;

• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up

• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;

• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or avoided=higher effectiveness (outreach) without

greater cost

Page 70: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

• FACULTY: QUALITY: same contact time/seat time, same scheduling as F2F + lower front-end design, faster start-up =

Does BOLD deliver the goods?

http://sonoranalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/ThumbsDown.jpg

• STUDENTS: ACCESSIBILITY: all online + higher interaction & lower isolation levels =

higher faculty buy-in;

lower W-DO rates, higher satisfaction levels;

• ADMIN: COST-EFFECTIVENESS: lower start-up

• costs; higher off-campus student enrolment levels ;

• Greater flexibility & Capacity; many costs offset or avoided=higher effectiveness (outreach) without

greater cost

Page 71: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

BOLD Research and Researchers

Instructional Design&

Technology

Distance Education/Online Learning/Blended Learning

GRADUATE STUDIES

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT

BOLD

ARE YOU A BOLD RESEARCHER?

Page 72: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

BOLD Research and Researchers

Instructional Design&

Technology

Distance Education/Online Learning/Blended Learning

GRADUATE STUDIES

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT

BOLD

DOCTORAL STUDENTS:

- CARON, BOLD & technol. innovation & change- COUTU, BOLD in indigenous communities- FAKIH, BOLD in Arab-speaking countries- ROY, BOLD & the ID & EM working relationship- SAVARD, BOLD and PLAR in Québec CEGEPs- ST-JACQUES, BOLD in graduate studies

Page 73: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

www.bold-research.org

Page 74: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths
Page 75: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths
Page 76: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

More on BOLD

• Power, M. (2009). A Designer’s Log: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Athabasca University Press http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120161 .

• Power, M. (2008). The emergence of blended online learning. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching. (4) 4. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/power_1208.htm

• Power, M. & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for graduate seminar delivery.

• Power, M. & Morven-Gould, A. (2011). Head of gold, feet of clay: the online learning paradox. 12 (2) IRRODL. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/916

Journal of Distance Education. 14(3) http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/649

[email protected]

Page 77: Sfu laval-sept-2012-leveraging-strengths

End

[email protected]