Serial Powering - Protection Purpose Protect the stave Assure supply of power to a serial powered...
-
Upload
ashlyn-little -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Serial Powering - Protection Purpose Protect the stave Assure supply of power to a serial powered...
Serial Powering - Protection
Purpose
Protect the staveAssure supply of power to a serial powered chain of modules when one member of the chain fails
Control the staveAllow power to arbitrary selection of modules
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
1
Why add protection?
2
Wire bonding failure
Power failure modes
Noisy module
Open circuit module
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Without protection, one failed module can adversely affect the operation of all other modules on staveDemonstration staves are very reliable - Protection is not strictly necessary
How to add protection?
3
Short out affected module(s)
-- Switch on --Short out and disable this
module
One module out-of-service
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
The switch should respond to module over-voltage and to DCS control
Issues to address
4
How does the protection do its job?Is automatic protection required?How fast must the protection react?Is DCS control/reporting required? (yes)How is the protection controlled?Switching must not affect the rest of the SP chain?Where should the switch be placed? (hybrid)Quantitative estimate of failure rate?What extra complexity can we justify?
Is protection needed for other powering configurations?
But…Circuit options default state connections
Feedback from hybrid current/voltage
Reaction time
Implementation requirements AC coupling
Automatic and/or DCS
Transient effects on problem &/or power-up
Bus-cable or hybrid
Numerical failure analysis
Switch failure modes, fail safe, mass, possibility of common mode failure, monitoring
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Note that independent module voltage monitoring may be available through the shunt regulator device if using an “intelligent” component such as SPi, but this may not be possible if there is a an open-circuit module. However, it may be possible to identify a faulty module by switching all modules off, then each one on in turn.
Qualitative target specification
5
DCS should be able to switch off (short-out) selected modulesResidual voltage (when ‘off’) < 100mVMinimise number of components, area of components and bus-cable linesPosition on hybrid is acceptableOver-voltage & over-current automatic protection is desirableSwitching a working module on/off must not affect the behaviour of other modulesDuring normal operation (module working) protection draws no power
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Can we use just one transistor for the task of shorting and SR?
Can we accept the risk of wire-bonds carrying power from bus-cable to hybrid or should protection be placed directly on the bus-cable?
Can SR and protection be included in a single ASIC package?
Examples
6
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
OR
Less material, but possibility of common mode failure
OR
Easier to implement, but depends on good wire bonding
a) Circuit option
7
No active protectionThis option has been sufficient for demonstration staves. This is a serious option for the ATLAS upgrade.
+ simpleminimum mass, minimum linesengineered redundancy including thick wire bonds & several shunt transistors
- Cannot switch modules off
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
b) Circuit option
8
BonnEach module has a single line to an off-detector controller. This can be used to switch the module off (short it) or to monitor the module voltage.
+ simple+ control & monitor
default state = OC
- no fast auto-response- many bus-cable wires
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
OC = Open Circuit (ie switch is “off”, module powered)
Ref ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop, NIKHEF 3-7 Nov 2008Powering, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 17:30 Laura Gonellahttp://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=32084
c) Circuit option
9
BNLA common data line fed to a one-wire controller output is latched and used on each module to switch the module off (short it).
+ latching control+ single DCS wire+ fast auto-response
default state = OC
- no monitor- low residual module- off voltage required
to hold latch
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Ref ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop, NIKHEF 3-7 Nov 2008Electronics Working Group, Tue 4 Nov 2008, 15:40 David Lynnhttp://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=32084
OC = Open Circuit (ie switch is “off”, module powered)
d) Circuit options
10
VillaniSimilar to the Bonn design, but power is delivered to the one-wire controller and latch by the data line.
+ latching control+ “single” DCS wire+ no trickle power
default state = OC
- no monitor- no auto-response
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
OC = Open Circuit (ie switch is “off”, module powered)
e) Circuit options
11
ExtendedAs Villani design, but latch may also be set in the safe state using the shunt regulator alarm. Also consider depletion mode FET for fail-safe.
+ latching control+ single DCS wire+ no trickle power+ auto-response
default = SC
- no monitor
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
SC = Short Circuit (ie switch is “on”, module un-powered)
Comparison
12
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Proposal
Auto over-voltage protection
Auto over-current protection
Latching
Minim
um (‘off’) voltage
Circuit com
plexity
Extra bus-cable lines
Extra passive m
odule com
ponents
Extra active m
odule components
Extra m
odule mass
Extra area m
m2
Dem
onstrated
No protection N N N n/a L 0 0 0 0 0 Y
Bonn N N N 0 L n 2 1 ? ? ?
BNL Y N Y ? M 2 4 3 ? 100 Y
Villani N N Y 0 H 2 ? ? ? ? ½
Extended Y Y Y 0 H 2 ? ? ? ? N
Summary
13
…circuit options are beingimplemented and evaluated…
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
End
14
…circuit designs follow…
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Bonn protection
15
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Copied from presentation by Laura GonellaATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop, NIKHEF 3-7 Nov 2008Powering, Wed 5 Nov 2008, 17:30http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=32084
BNL protection
16
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
Copied from presentation by David Lynn
ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop, NIKHEF 3-7 Nov 2008Electronics Working Group, Tue 4 Nov 2008http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=32084
SI 1450DH1k
5k
8 nF
EDZTE613.6
ZXTDA1M832PNP-NPN Single Package
Ds2413
IN
O UT
M odule
Protection
V
I/O
G nd
P
Villani protection
17
Richard Holt – Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryATLAS SCT SP protection options
January 2009
From Giulio Villani, RAL – personal communication