Searches for exotic mesons Stephen L. Olsen University of Hawai’i DOE site visit Aug 22, 2005 cc u...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Searches for exotic mesons Stephen L. Olsen University of Hawai’i DOE site visit Aug 22, 2005 cc u...
Searches for exotic mesons
Stephen L. Olsen University of Hawai’i
DOE site visit Aug 22, 2005
c c
ud
uud
u
u cuc•Multi-quark molecules
•qq-gluon hybrids
•baryonium
Probe QCD from other directions
non-qq or non-qqq hadron spectroscopies:
Reawakened by the claims for Pentaquarks
e.g. an S=+1 baryon
ud
usd
Pentaquarks?“Seen” in many experiments
BaBar
High interest:1st pentaquark paperhas >500 citations
BelleBES
but not seen in just as many others
CDF
Compass
Jlab p
Pentaquark Scoreboard
Positive signals Negative results
Also: Belle Compass L3 Jlab(CLAS) (pK+Ksn)
Yes: 17 No: 18
This talk
• Searches for non-standard mesons with hidden charm at Belle
• Search for baryonium mesons at BES
c cu cuc
ud
uud
u
searches for non-standard mesons with “hidden charm” at Belle
• standard cc mesons are:– best understood theoretically– narrow & non overlapping
• c + c systems are commonly produced in B meson decays.
b
cc
s
Vcb
cosC
CKM favored
W-
c c
u cuc
(i.e containing c & c)
Its existence is well established
seen in 4 experiments
X(3872)
CDF
X(3872)
D0
hep-ex/0406022
9.411.6
no obvious cc assignment
3872
c”
hc’
c1’
2
c2
3
M too low and too small
angular dist’n rules out 1
J/ way too small
c too small;M() wrong
c& DD) too small
c should dominate
SLO hep-ex/0407033
JPC possibilities (for J ≤ 2)
0--
exotic
violates parity
0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S))
1-+
exotic
DD allowed
1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2)
2- +
(c2)
2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
JPC possibilities0-- ruled out; JP=0+,1- & 2+ unlikely
0--
exotic
violates parity 0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S))
1-+
exotic
DD allowed
1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2)
2- +
(c2)
2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
Strong evidence for C=+1
13.6 ± 4.4 X(3872)J/evts (>4significance)
X(3872)J/
virtual (782)?
X(3872)J/
Bf(XJ/)
Bf(XJ/)=0.14 ± 0.05
Br(X3J/)Br(X2J/) = 1.0 ± 0.5
M()
M()
X(3872)J/
Fits to (760)
JPC possibilities (C=-1 ruled out)
0--
exotic
Violates parity 0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S)) 1-+
exotic
DD allowed
1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2) 2- +
(c2)
2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
Angular Correlations
K
J/
J=0J=0X3872
Jz=0
z
Rosner (PRD 70 094023)
Bugg (PRD 71 016006)
Suzuki, Pakvasa (PLB 579 67)
JPC possibilities (0-+ & 0++ ruled out)
0--
exotic
violates parity
0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S)) 1-+
exotic
DD allowed
1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2) 2- +
(c2)
2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
M() can distinguish -J/ S- & P-waves
S-wave: 2/dof = 43/39 P-wave: 2/dof = 71/39
q*roll-off
q*3
roll-off
(CL=0.1%)(CL= 28%)
Shape of M() distribution nearthe kinematic limit favors S-wave
Possible JPC values (J-+ ruled out)
0--
exotic
violates parity
0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S))
1-+
exotic
DD allowed1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2)
2- +
(c2) 2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
X(3872) D0D00 ?
11.3±3.6 sig.evts (>4)
Bf(BKX)Bf(XDD)=2.2±0.7±0.4x10-4
D*0D00?
M(D0D00)
• 1++ : DD* in an S-wave q*
• 2++ : DD in a D-wave q*5
Strong threshold suppression
Possible JPC values (2++ ruled out)
0--
exotic
violates parity
0-+
(c”)
0++
DD allowed
(c0’)
0+-
exotic
DD allowed
1- -
DD allowed
((3S))
1-+
exotic
DD allowed1++
(c1’)
1+-
(hc’)
2- -
(2)
2- +
(c2)
2++
DD allowed
c2’)
2+-
exotic
DD allowed
1++1++
can it be a 1++ cc state?
1++c1’
3872
Mass is too low
Bf(XJ/)>4%
is too large(Isospin
forbidden)
c1’ component of X(3872) is ≤ few%
Intriguing fact
MX3872 =3872 ± 0.6 ± 0.5 MeV
mD0 + m D0* = 3871.2 ± 1.0 MeV
lowest masscharmed meson
lowest mass spin=1charmed meson
D D*
2 loosely bound qq color singlets
with M = mD + mD* -
u
cu
c
one exchangeattractive for 1++ Tornqvist PLB 590, 209 (2004)
Deuson? deuteron-like DD* bound state?
X(3872) = D0D*0 bound state?
• JPC = 1++ is favored
• M ≈ mD0 + mD0*
• Large isospin violation is natural (& was predicted):
|D0D*0> = 1/2(|10> - |00>)
• (XJ/) < (XJ/) was predicted
• (XD0D00) too large?
Equal mixture of I=1 & I =0
Swanson PLB 598, 197 (2004)
Tornqvist PLB 590, 209 (2004)
Swanson PLB 588, 189 (2004)
X(3872) conclusion
•JPC = 1++
•cc content is small
•matches most expectations for a D0D*0 bound state
C C
u cuca non-qq meson
Are there others?Is the X(3872) a one-of-a-kind curiousity?
or the 1st entry in a new spectroscopy?
Look at other B decays hadrons+J/
BK J/
BK J/
BK J/
BK J/ in Belle
“Y(3940)”M≈3940 ± 11 MeV≈ 92 ± 24 MeV
Mbc Mbc Mbc
S.K. Choi & S.L.Olsen et al.(Belle), PRL94, 182002 (2005)
M(J/) MeV
Y(3940): What is it?
• Charmonium?– Conventional wisdom: J/ should not be
a discovery mode for a cc state with mass above DD & DD* threshold!
• Some kind of -J/ threshold interaction?– the J/is not surrounded by brown
muck; can it act like an ordinary hadron?
J/
Brambilla et al (QWG) hep-ph/0412158
Y(3940): What is it (cont’d)?
• another tetraquark?– M ≈ 2mDs
– not seen in YJ/• ( contains ss)
– width too large??– no exchange for DSDS
s csc
??PRL 93, 041801
M( J/)
Y(3940): What is it (cont’d) ?
• cc-gluon hybrid?– predicted by QCD,– decays to DD and DD* are suppressed (“open-charm” thresh = mD + m D** = 4.3 GeV)
– large hadron+J/ widths are predicted– masses expected to be 4.3 ~ 4.4 GeV
(higher than what we see)
c c
Horn & Mandula PRD 17 898 (1974) + (many) others
BaBar’s Y(4260)
)or ( /ISR eeJ/ψJee
211 fb-1 data collected at √(s) = 10.58 GeV
(2S) Y(4260)
11802110 (2S) evts12523 Y(4260) evts
J/ sideband
Well above DD & DD* threshold but found in an OZI-suppressed mode??
M=4259 8 MeV
= 88 23 MeV
B. Aubert et al. (BaBar)hep-ph/0506081
cc summary• X(3872):
– JPC established as 1++
– cc component is small (≤ few %)– all properties consistent with a D0D*0
bound stateu cuc
a non-standard meson
• Y(3940) Belle, Y(4260) BaBar
c c
?????
- Lots to do: determine JPC ; find other modes (DD*, DsDs, …?)
Hardronic charmonium transitions
(’J/) 70 keV
(”J/) 50 keV
(’J/) 5 keVSUF(3) violating
HW (for theorists):How can (Y3940)J/)and (Y(4260)J/)be ~1000x larger?
J/ pp (at BES)
M(pp)
M(pp)-2mp (GeV)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
M=1859 MeV/c2
< 30 MeV/c2 (90% CL)
+3 +510 25
3-body phase space
acceptance weighted BW
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 022001 (2003)
Baryonium potential & Wave fcn
X ’ should be a strong channel
-V0(r)
Potentialbarrier
G.J. Dung & M.L. Yan hep-ph/0502127
“Rectangularized”Skyrmion-type
potentialI = 0, Jpc=0-+
pp annihilationM ~ 1860 MeV ~ 16 MeV large
uncertainties
M(’) from J/ ’
54264obsN
410)4.04.02.2()()( XBXJB
7.7The +- mass spectrum for decaying into +- and
BESII Preliminary
59.18.0 10)4.00.7()()(:..
ppXBXJBfc
M = 183463 MeV = 68 20 8 MeV
Re-fit to J/p p including FSI
Include FSI curve from A.Sirbirtsev et al. ( Phys.Rev.D71:054010, 2005 ) in the fit (I=0)
M = 1830.6 6.7 MeV
= < 153 MeV @90%C.L.
ppp mM 2In good agreement
with X(1835)
_
• c2,c0<<c1•X(3872) production much lower than for other Charmonium states:•can set lower limit on B.F.
Can measure absolute B.F.’s of B-K-X0
e+e-B+B-
K-X0
Lower limit on BF(XJ/) > 4.3% @ 90% C.L
244 fb-1
Very clear J/ and c signals N J/=258+- 42N c =266 +-42
c2 c1 c0
J/
Jon ColemanMoriond-QCDMarch 2005
Kinematic variables
CM energy difference:
Beam-constrained mass:
2/
2 )()2( JKCMbc ppEm
BK J
BKJ2// cmJK EEEE
B
Bϒ(4S)
Ecm/2
e e
Ecm/2
Mbc
E
1++
l
1++: sin2l sin2
K
1++ looks okay!
compute angles inX(3872) restframe
|cosl|
2/dof = 11/9
|cos|
2/dof = 5/9