Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

22
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25- 26, 2002

Transcript of Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Page 1: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Page 2: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Scientific Progress through Interdepartmental Co-operation

Hartmut Grassl

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology

Meteorological Institute, University Hamburg

Page 3: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

OutlineMotivation

Results (Examples)

• Improving GCM parameterizations by LES modelling

• Complex planetary boundary layers measured and modelled

• Global distribution of semi-volatile organic compounds

Plans (Examples)

• Tropospheric aerosols and the climate of the North Atlantic region

• Persistent organic substances in and above the North Sea and

the Baltic Sea

• Evaluation of all MPI Met models by ENVISAT data

Page 4: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Motivation

•Most scientific progress originates from new data that falsify and subsequently improve models

•The experimental groups and the modellers have to co-operate

•In addition corporate identity is strengthened

Page 5: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

LES for GCM Parameterizations (I)Chlond/Bäuml/Roeckner

Method:

1. Determine reduction factor for different cloud types using Large-Eddy Simulations and radiative transfer calculations

2. Implement correction factor into standard two-stream scheme, diagnosing cloud type from phase and cloud thickness

Goal:

Development of a radiative transfer parameterization in the ECHAM5 model which accounts for the effect of horizontal sub-grid scale cloud variability

Basis:

Effective Thickness Approach (Cahalan, 1994): Optical thickness of clouds is reduced by a correction factor

Page 6: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Geographical distribution of the mean winter albedo bias due to cloud inhomogeneity

Results:

• Albedo is reduced by 1.8 % in the global annual mean (corres-ponding to an increase of net SW radiation by 6.2 W/m2)

• Correction factors are in the range 0.4 1 for water clouds (depending on LWP), = 0.9 for ice clouds

Page 7: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

LES for GCM Parameterizations (II)Chlond/Müller/Roeckner

Goals:

• advance the understanding of the physical processes that determine the thermal and dynamical state of the cloud-topped boundary layer

• evaluate and improve methods of representing shallow cloud systems in global climate models of the atmosphere

• produce comprehensive 4-D data sets using LESs

• use of LES data sets to investigate deficiencies in ECHAM using the Single Column Model (SCM) version as a test bed

• correct and improve parameterizations in ECHAM

Page 8: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

LES vs SCM: Diurnal variation of LWP (FIRE)

Result: ECHAM-SCM produces a too shallow boundary layer and predicts a too low liquid water path but with a timing in phase compared with the observations

Page 9: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Observation and simulation of a double boundary layer over the Baltic Sea

Bösenberg/Jacob/Hennemuth

• During PEP in BALTEX a double-layered PBL was observed over the central Baltic Sea (Gotland) by lidar and other sensors

• REMO in the BALTEX version with 1/6° horizontal resolution is capable to simulate such structures

• The model results indicate that the upper layer is the advected PBL over land

• The occurrence of an elevated layer over the marine PBL further suppresses the vertical transport of sensible and latent heat from the surface layer into the free atmosphere

• Concerning PBL structure the Baltic Sea is rather a big lake than an ocean

Page 10: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Observation of the phenomenon

Page 11: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Simulation of the phenomenon

Page 12: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Profiles of Latent Heat Flux through Combination of an H2O-DIAL and a RADAR-RASS

Bösenberg/Peters/Wulfmeyer

Objective: Determine the vertical transport of water vapourin the boundary layer.

Approach: Eddy correlation technique using high resolution retrievals of vertical wind and water vapour.

Advantages: No assumptions on turbulence structure. Representative for large area.

Technique: RASS for vertical wind.DIAL for water vapour.

Page 13: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Profiles of Latent Heat Flux through Combination of an H2O-DIAL and a RADAR-RASS

Bösenberg/Peters/Wulfmeyer

P1 P2 P3 P4From Wulfmeyer, Atmos. Sci.

Gotland 12/13 September 1996

Page 14: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Vertical Structure of Aerosol Optical Properties over Europe

Bösenberg/Feichter

EARLINET• Systematic measurements of aerosol profiles at 22 stations in Europe• Quantitative lidar methods (Raman lidar, multi-angle method) applied• Quality controlled• Products: backscatter and extinction profiles, optical depth• Special measurements for diurnal cycle, Saharan dust, forest fires• 2.5 years of measurements • More than 10000 profiles

MODEL SIMULATIONS• Relaxation of the GCM towards

observed meteorology

• Calculation of the distribution of

the aerosol physical, chemical and

optical properties

• Atmospheric GCM ECHAM5-T63

(2ox2o horizontal resolution)

including aerosol microphysics

Page 15: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Intercomparison Observations - Model resultsRequirements for future cooperation

• Realistic intercomparison requires:

• Modelling of observable parameters:• Backscatter and extinction, optical depth• Calculation of statistical distribution• Improved representation of the PBL• Detailed comparison for typical situations

• Improved microphysical retrievals• Improved temporal coverage

Page 16: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Environmental fate of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs), in particular persistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Lammel/Feichter

Scientific objectives: • Understanding the fate of those substances which migrate between compartments on large spatial scales• Validation of model tools used in decision making (national and international chemicals legislation / conventions)

Methodological achievements:• Multicompartment chemistry-transport model• Characterization of environmental fate by novel and appropriate indicators

Results obtained:• The persistence and long-range transport potential of SOCs are strongly (and more than expected) dependent on the location and the time of entry into the environment.

Page 17: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Environmental Fate as a Function of Location of Entry DDT emission from China (overall persistence Poverall = 10 years, effective spatial spreading SSeff = 750 km)

Ocean Atmosphere

Turkey (Poverall = 13 years, SSeff = 1900 km)

Page 18: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

HOAPS

Page 19: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Direct and Indirect Aerosol EffectsOlaf Krüger, Johann Feichter

• Emissions: Africa (Sahara), USA, Europe

• Influence on ITCZ, NAO

• Correlations between cloud water/precipitation and

cloud albedo

• Evaluation of coupled global models with long satellite

time series (AVHRR, MODIS)

Page 20: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

EXPOSURE TO PERSISTENT ORGANIC SUBSTANCES AND EFFECTS IN THE NORTH SEA AND BALTIC SEA ATMOSPHERIC AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS

• INTERDISCIPLINARY:

• INTEGRATED: exposure (environmental) and effects (wildlife, humans) or: P+S+I #• GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS: German Bight (during the 1st phase)• PROCESS FOCUS: air-sea exchange (1st phase)• SUBSTANCE FOCUS: exploratory (1st phase)

Field Laboratory Modelling Atmospheric Sciences (MPI/MI) * * Oceanic Sciences (IfM) * * Chemical Analysis (IBM/FB13) *

Biological Analysis and Epidemiology (IHF)

* *

Public Health - Epidemiology (FB4) *

#D = driverP = pressureS = stateI = impactR = response

Page 21: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

Conclusions

• Development of new remote sensing tools (sensors + algorithms) and LES modelling has reached a level that allows global and regional model evaluation and improvement

• Co-operation within the ZMAW will give us the capability of ecosystem model evaluation

• Our hypothesis: There is a connection between NH anthropogenic aerosol load and ITCZ as well as NAO

Page 22: Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002.

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002

Hartmut Grassl et al.: Interdepartmental Co-operation

THE END