8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

1/12

July 2013

A Quarterly Student Journal

(For private circulation only.)

Samvit

Knowledge beyond time ......

visit us @ www.amrita.edu/samvit

Issue

6

Samskriti, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri Campus

Children, today our minds have become like potted plants. I a potted plant goes

without being watered, it begins to wither. Similarly without adhering to our observances

and disciplines we wont be able to bring our mind to control. We must lead our lives

according to our gurus instructions. Once the mind is totally under our control, there

is nothing to ear. Viveka has dawned within us and will guide us.

Whenever I have read any part o the Vedas, I have elt that some unearthly and unknown

light illuminated me. In the great teaching o the Vedas, there is no touch o sectarianism.

It is o all ages, climes and nationalities and is the royal road or the attainment o the Great

Knowledge. When I am at it, I eel that I am under the spangled heavens o a summer nights

Henry David Toreau

(1817-1862)

EditorialNo occupation is so delightful to me as

the culture of the earth, and no culture

comparable to that of the garden.

Tomas Jefferson

Te above quote, as is aptly spoken by

Tomas Jefferson, compares culture toa garden. Te garden means heaven

whose gardener is the divine lord

himsel. Such is the importance o

culture and history in our lives that it is

compared to the purest imagination o

the mankind. AMRIA is an institution

o proessional excellence, but why this

exigent prominence to cultural and

historical importance o India is being

brought out to you at regular intervals?

Tis is a question that we should ask

ourselves consciously. Te answer lies

in the act that engineering, banking,science, law etc. are noble pursuits

necessary or sustaining lie; but

culture, poetry, and history are things

that we live or as we are the members

o human race, filled with passion and

love.

So Samvit is a sincere effort to remind

all the readers to reflect upon the

vast, rich, culture they belong to. Tis

provides us with a niche in the world

that prompts us to say that we are

proud Indians; because we belong to

a legacy that is honourable, diversifiedand respected. Tis could be reflected

upon to gain back our confidence. It is

hereby guaranteed that as you go ahead,

read and comprehend this journal you

will bloom anew. Winding up with a

beautiul quote rom John Keats.

Nothing ever becomes real till it is

experienced.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

2/12

2

Of Sangam AgeMethil Devika

find themselves a good patron in a particular king. Te present ragas find

their genesis in the panns o the Sangam age. Te dances are ot the outset

secular and spontaneous, rather then ritualistic and finally systemized.

Te first organized dance concert is seen in the arangetrukathai (chapter

on Madhavis arangetrum) o Chilapatikaram where Madhavis dance

training, practice regimen, and the styles o dances and her recital

repertoire are greatly elaborated. In Chilapatikaram there is mention

o kootha chakkian (Chakkyar) perorming in ront o prince Cheran

Senguttavan.

In olkappiyam, there is a chapter on the eight rasas or sentiments.

olkapiyam is believed to have been written beore Natyasastra. Te

names o the rasas are different although their explanations are similar.

Te determinants leading to these rasas are mentioned in olkapiyam.

An interesting reerence is o the determinants leading to the nakai rasa

which is the equivalent o haasya or laughter. It mentions the babbling

o lunatics, blooming words o babies and the tamil spoken by Aryans as

causing mirth and leading to the nakai rasa.

People believed in justice, otherwise why would Kannagi go storming intothe kings court and burn the whole city o Madurai in order to avenge

her husbands death. Tere are interesting anecdotes. A man has two

wives. Te second wie is holding the first wies child. By mistake it slips

rom her hands and alls into the well. In utter despair, she throws her

own child into the well. Te images are realistic and spontaneous in the

Sangam works. An old mother hears that her son has been killed in war.

In anxiety she runs to his body to see i he had been killed rom the ront

or rom the back. She is happy to see that he had been hit rom the ront

as he has died a brave warrior. For i he had been hit rom behind (in case

he was fleeing in ear), her sorrow at having given birth to a coward would

be graver than his death.

Many historians have reerred to Southern India as the cradle o human

race. Researchers have proven that amizhagam was in existence 15000years ago. Sir W.W. Hunter in his History o India writes that peninsular

India or the country o the South was geologically distinct rom the Indo-

Gangetic plain. Afer the submergence o the original amizhagam and

emergence o the Himalaya, the land lying between the latter and Cape

Comorin became one and came to be called India.

Recently I read that amizhagam is the remains o a ormer continent

which stretched continuously to Arica in the space now occupied by the

Indian Ocean in the West , to Australia in the south covering Lanka, and

to Kamaschatka in the east. Tis means that i the European spectator

that I was mentioning in the beginning o this article were to ask me his

question again, I just might have to say YES.

A year ago, during one o my lecture-demonstrations on the nuances o

Mohiniyattam, a European spectator queried i Mohiniyattam had any

connection with a eminine dance orm that he had seen in the west-

coast o Australia. I clarified with an instant NO. I said that we did have

common practices with South-east Asia but certainly not Australia.

Te South Indian dance orms trace their mythological as well as technical

origins rom the treatise called the Natyasastra. Te Natyasastra has

compiled the common dance codes that existed nearly 2000 years ago

in Eurasia, South-east Asia and India. But one usually orgets that it is

the Sangam literature that provides a much richer corpus or tracing the

origin o Indian rhetoric, poetic, music, fine art and dance.

Te Sangam literature belonged to amizhagam and was compiled

between 2000 B.C. and A.D. 300. It was a collection o works by eminent

writers that were approved by the ruling kings through their committees.

Any person who wrote could hand over his work to the committee that

consisted o scholars. Te scholars persue the work and see i it has

ollowed the required norms o poetry, grammar or ethics and i they were

really impressed they would include it into the Sangam compilation. Whatmade the Sangam literature unique was that it was meant to be preserved

through centuries. Te Sangam epoch lasted thousands o years, covered

the reigns o five hundred kings and included the work o thousands o

poets.

A ew o the prominent Sangam works are, Koothanul (the science o

acting), Panchamarabu (five anthologies), olkappiyam (earliest work

on grammar), Pathupaattu (10 idylls), Ettuthokai (8 anthologies) and

the later Sangam epics called Manimekhalai, Chilapatikaram, and other

religious and philosophical works.

Te works give a vividly detailed account o the Chola, Pandya and

Chera dynasties. Te Chola capital was Poompuhar and it was a sea-

port with ships bringing merchandise o pearls, gems, spices and horses.

Te enormous Chola gate bore the tigers stamp and every export and

import had the tigers seal. Tere were wide roads and people o all sects

predominantly Dravidians, Buddhists, Jains and the later Vedic Brahmins

co-existed. Te Roman Ionians called Yavanas and the Greeks called

mlechas served the Cholas court. Kannagi and Kovalan, the protagonists

o Chilapatikaram were Buddhists and the author, Ilango Adigal was Jain.

Tere was great amount o religious tolerance and harmony. Tere were

kings, chiefains, monks, vellala (merchants) and paanar (musicians) In

the evenings people made merry at the beaches- the waters believed to

cleanse them off their daily sins.

Te poems are initially naturalistic and gradually became ethical and

religious. Tey are not only beautiul but give a detailed imagery o the

landscape, flora and auna. Te songs o love and war are segregatedinto the five landscapes o kurinji (hills), mullai (jungle), paalai (desert),

neythal (ocean tract) and marutam (paddy filelds). Te behavior o

love and lovers change according to the landscape. While women o the

mountains were more patient, those o the paddy-fields were sulky.

Love in Sangam is divided into kalavu (pre-marital courtship or eloping)

and karupu (love afer marriage). Te consequences o kalavu were

marriage or death. Death in the sense that the maiden would either marry

her lover or preer to die. In later poems one would find the maidens desire

to return to her lover in another space/birth. Te idea o transmigration

o the body is brought in by the vedic-seers/Aryans who came to

amizhagam. Pre-marital courtship was allowed by the parents and the

maiden decided who she would marry when and where. Te marriage

rules were introduced much later where the men were oreigners and didnot keep their word.

Muruga the war-god was the chie Dravidian God . Kotravi was the war-

goddess and there was no idol worship. In the later Sangam works we

find mention o the Aryan Gods Vishnu and Lakshmi. Buddhism brought

with it worship o animals, renunciation and vegetarianism.

One finds mention o bards called paanar, dancers called viraliyar and

actors called koothar . Te Pathupaattu are songs asking the bards to go

Methil DevikaMethil Devika is a practitioner

of Mohiniyattam and research

scholar at Bharatidasan University.

She works as lecturer for the Post

Graduate Department at the Kerala

Kalamandalam Deemed University

and has disseminated the art form

widely through SPIC-MACAY. She

won the Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva

Puraskar from Kendra Sangeeta

Nataka Akademy (2007). The

Devadasi National Award from the

Government of Orissa (2010), and

the Kerala Sangeeta Nataka Akademy

Award (2010). She qualified the

UGC/NET eligibility for lectureship in

performing arts in the year 2000 after

her post graduation in MA (Dance)/

Rabindra Bharati University Kolkatta

and MBA (Madras University).

Empanelled with the ICCR, she has

a fellowship from the Ministry of

Culture.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

3/12

3

Sharpening Te Human Mind Trough AshtavadhanamMeenu G

S5 ECE B

Tere is a story o a child named Narendra. Once, while his teacher was

taking class, Narendra was very busy talking to his riends in the back

bench. He was telling something very interesting that his riends ignored

the teachings o their master and listened to him. Te teacher who ound

out the disturbance to his class started asking questions about what he

was teaching to the people who were not listening to him. At last when

he asked Narendra, he answered his all questions and also told him at

which part he stopped! Its quite amazing that a small child was able

to concentrate on talking and teachings at the same time. How many

o us have wondered about possessing such an ability o multitasking

so that we could have completed our job in hand effectively? Ten, we

must understand that the very basic need to attain this, is high power

o concentration. Tis helped that child to become the great cultural

ambassador o India, Swami Vivekananda.

People use the word concentration reely. But very ew have understood its

true meaning and the importance residing inside it. Its a key which, when

combined with will and perseverance, can open all the doors and lead to

success in any endeavor-material or spiritual. Te value o an individual

is proportionate to the value o his attention. Usually when people talk o

concentration, they imply keeping the mind steady on one thing at a time.

But it is quite possible to develop power o double, triple and multiple

concentration. India gave birth to a powerul art called ashtavadhanam

that helps one to concentrate on multiple things.

Avadhanam is a literary perormance rom the very ancient days in India.

lt originated as a Sanskrit literary process and is revived by Kannada and

elugu poets in modern times. It involves the partial improvisation o

poems using specific themes. It requires immense memory power and

tests a persons capability o perorming multiple tasks simultaneously.

All the tasks are memory intensive and demand an in-depth knowledge

o literature and prosody. Te tasks vary rom making up a poem

simultaneously to keeping a count o bell ringing at random. No externalmemory aids are allowed while perorming these tasks except the persons

mind. Avadhanam can be considered as the Divide attention (clinical

model o attention) as it is the highest level o attention and it reers to

the ability to respond simultaneously to multiple tasks or multiple task

demands.

In the process o Avadhana, the Avadhani has to undergo critical

analyzation o various questions a human mind can pass through in

different stages o ones lie. He must answer the questions, step by step,

in extempore metrical compositions in accordance with the specifications

given by the people who had developed the above mentioned queries.

Te number o scholars who ask the questions may be eight, a hundred,

or a even a thousand. I the number is eight, then the perormance is

called Ashtavadhana or Eight-Fold Concentration and the person iscalled Ashtavadhani. I the number is hundred it is called Shatavadhana

and in case o thousand it is called Sahasravadhana. Te scholars who

ask the questions to Avadhani are called Prcchakas or questioners. Te

first person to ask the question is called Pradhana Pracchaka. He is the

same as any other Prcchaka except that he asks the questions first. Te

questions asked are primarily literary in nature. Te pracchakas can

optionally place additional constraints. Tough it is not stated explicitly,

conormation to Chandas(poetic meter) is mandatory. Avadhani should

answer them in the orm o a poem. Te questions generally consists o a

description given in prose and the avadhani has to express it as a poem.

Te additional restrictions placed by the Prcchakas can be anything like

asking the Avadhani not to use a given set o alphabet in the entire poem,

to construct only a particular type o poem (with the same Vritha orAlankara) etc.

Te entire perormance demands rom the Avadhana - a great power o

concentration, a powerul memory, spontaneous creativity, imagination,

poetic ability and quick thinking. For the spectators too it is a very ulfilling,

enriching and enjoyable experience. An Avadhani must possess a great

competence in handling a variety o subjects, a sharp intellect, a strong

sel-confidence, and a whole wide knowledge o the Shastras. Apart rom

his literary expertise and dexterit, the ability to entertain the audience is

also necessary. For this a pleasing personality, a sense o humor and a

melodious voice are some important actors.

During Ashtavadhanam, the Avadhani divides his attention on eight

different topics to deal with the eight different items. When the Avadhani

handles a particular item he keeps that part o brain alert. He has to bevery careul to see that no part get mixed up with another. Sometimes

,there may be a lapse in the Avadhanis concentration. Tis could happen

when a difficult question is put to him, i there is a commotion in the

Sabha(meeting hall), or when the questioners are not sympathetic but

hostile. Such dangers have to be recognized in prior to the act and the

perormer has to take necessary actions in advance.

Avadhanas have been practiced in different fields. Based on the field

where the main stream perormance happens, Avadhana can be classified

into numerous types. Poetry is the main subject o Kavitavadhana and in

Sangitavadhana it is music. Vaidyavadhana takes medical science as its

main subject and Jyotisavadhana deals with astronomy and astrology. In

Ghantavadhana bells o different sizes are used to test the concentration o

the Avadhani. In case o Hastacalani, Nayanasajna and Chotikavadhana,the movements o the hands, the eyes and the snapping o the thumb

respectively are the means used by the questioners. Chaturangavadhana

is concerned with chess and Ganitavadhana deals with mathematics.

In an Ashtavadhana eight scholars ask the Avadhani questions on eight

different items related to a particular subject like literature, music or

medical science etc .

Te origin o the art o concentration can be traced back to the oral

tradition o learning Vedas. From, this oral tradition developed various

ways o reciting the Vedic mantras in order to memorize them perectly.

Te Veda learner is called the Avadhani. Simultaneously several types

o games developed which were played by the Avadhani to help them to

learn Veda more effectively. With this tradition, perhaps several types

o Avadhana or eats o concentration originated. Later Avadhanas wereincorporated into the poetric tradition and Avadhana developed as a

literary activity or sport.

Te real age o Avadhana starts in eighteenth century. Te whole o

eighteenth and nineteenth century is called the Golden age or Prachinayuga

o Avadhana. Tis is the time when Avadhana took a new turn and reached

its pinnacle. Te Navayuga or the new age o Avadhana starts with the

beginning o twentieth century. Tis is the time when large number o

scholars involved in the art orm started stepping back. Gradually, the art

o Avadhana began to decline. However it has not completely disappeared

and there is still a ew Avadhanis in Sanskrit and elugu, who keep this

great tradition alive even in this era o Kaliyuga.

India, in course o time developed a rich culture. A civilization, so dynamicas this in general, is a multitude o power tools. Among these are the

acilities o the weapon Sanskrit language and the basis o a vast culture

which gives prior importance to human values and emotions. While

the power o concentration is basis to all sel-realizations and success in

material and spiritual field, Sanskrit on the other hand has been a major

instrument through which the whole event expressed itsel. Tough it is

true that there is a gradual decline with time; India is at the threshold o

sel-awakening. It is obvious that the age o secrets will unold once again.

Glimpses o the historical art orm Ashtavadhanam together with the

insight into Sanskrit language shows us not only the mans possibilities o

exploring the human mind but also the amazing power o concentration

and priceless nature o language o Gods, the language that have shaken

Indias past ,one hopes will once again help the uture.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

4/12

4

Vikramasila-Te Forgotten Dream University Sudha Nair

Aashritha L S

S3 ECE

Our India was once reerred to as Te Golden Bird, not just because o

its material riches but also because o its intellectual wealth. She has been

a mother, rom whom many new inventions and ideas which are now

prevalent in the world, have been born. We had many world renowned

centres o learning and scholars rom across the globe competed among

themselves to get admitted into one o these seats o learning. Can you

believe that the idea o conducting entrance examinations originated

right rom these ancient institutions?! Vikramasila Vihara was one such

university which ollowed this method or admitting new students rom

around the world.

Sri Vikramasila Vihara, ounded by king Dharmapala was erected on

a suitable site, a hillock on the banks o the holy Ganges in Northern

Magadha [modern day Bihar].Te Vihara was constructed ollowing a

well calculated design. A strong outer wall decorated with artistic work

surrounded the Vihara, at the centre o which was erected a temple adorned

with Mahabodhi images. Te complex comprised o 108 temples in all.

Even the total number o staff recruited, adds up to 108, which could have

had some special significance, 108 being a sacred number according to

the Hindu tradition. Te University came to have 6 colleges each housing

108 teachers and a central hall called the House o Science with its 6

gates opening on the 6 colleges. On the walls o the University were also

painted portraits o Pandits eminent or their learning and character.

eaching was controlled by a board o eminent teachers and this board is

stated to have administered the affairs o Nalanda University. Vikramasila

is said to have had 6 Dvara-Panditas (Sanskrit: Dvara meaning doors

or openings and Panditas meaning Scholars) or Gatekeepers who were

the most erudite o its scholars. Tey guarded all the 6 entrances to the

University and asked questions to the scholars. Te scholars had to prove

that they were worthy to obtain admission to the University by answering

the questions put orth to them by the well versed scholars at the gates-

similar to the modern entrance exams o today! Tis was to ensure

that admission to the University would not be easy and its standard o

scholarship was not lowered. Te President o the University was always

the most learned and religious sage. Its ounder was Buddha-Jnana-Pada.

Te history o Vikramasila can be traced rom the accounts o some o

its amous scholars and teachers. Te amous Chinese traveller Hiuen-

sang was a student o Vikramasila or several years and had penned

down a comprehensive account o the rules and regulations and daily

lie and studies o the students, on the basis o his first-hand knowledge.

Pragnakaramati, Vagisrava, Ratnakara and many other Gatekeepers o theVihara wrote several amous works, some o which are in ibetan or were

translated to ibetan.

Dipamkara was the greatest o Indian Scholars who worked as missionaries

in oreign countries. Heres the story o how Dipamkara, popularly known

as Acharya Atisa went to ibet :

Te ibetan Monk Nag-tsho was deputed by the ibetan King to

Vikramasila or the purpose o inducing its great scholar, Atisa, to come

to ibet and take charge o the Buddhist propaganda in that country. Nag-

tsho arrived at the gate o the monastery in the evening and when the

gate could not be opened under its rules, he ound shelter or the night at

a Dharmasala at the gate. Te gate was opened in the early morning and

Nag-tsho proceeded to the ibetan House o the monastery meant or the

residence o its ibetan students. At the ibetan House, Nag-tsho saw its

senior monk, Gya-tson who advised him to be a resident pupil o Sthavira

Ratnakara, who was also the chie o Atisa himsel although Atisa had the

highest reputation or learning and character. For the next day was fixed

a congregation o 8,000 monks o all classes at Vikramasila. Te more

distinguished monks were given reserved seats. Te Raja o Vikramasila

(Te King o Magadha) was given an exalted seat. But none o the monks,

old or young rose rom the seat to mark his arrival. But all the monks

including the king rose rom their seats when the learned monk Vira Vajra

and Atisa entered. In the next ew days, the ibetan messenger saw Atisa

distributing alms and ood to the poor and was much impressed by his

charity. Atisa was also very much moved by the great trouble and expenses

repeatedly borne by the ibetan or his sake and decided to accompanyhim to ibet. He asked the ibetan messenger to wait or 18 months so

that he could finish his work on hand. At the time o his departure or

ibet, Atisa handed over charge o the various offices he had held to the

monastic authorities. His guide Nag-tsho packed the travelling baggage o

the party in 60 loads which were carried by 30 bullocks. Beore leaving,

Atisa ,in his usual spirit o charity and sel sacrifice distributed the ibetan

Gold brought to him as a present or his deputation in our parts-the 1st

part were given to his Acharyas,the 2nd to President Ratnakara, who was

to use it or the benefit o the whole clergy o the monastery. Te 3rd

was sent to Vajrasana who was to endow religious services there. Finally,

the 4th part was given to the King or distribution among the general

Buddhist samghas o the country. On reaching ibet, he was received by a

Song o Welcome by the people and conducted to the king by an escorto 300 horsemen. It is really interesting to note that on his first setting oot

on ibetan soil, Atisa was entertained with the national drink o ibet

which was ea. Te ibetan monk offering this drink to the Indian guest

described it thus : Venerable sir, it is called Cha....We do not know that

the Cha plant is eaten but the leaves are churned and mixed with Soda, Salt

and Butter in warm water and the soup is drunk. It has many properties.

It was thus that the use o ea spread rom ibet to India.

Te prodigies o piety and learning Te Vikramasila University produced,

and the proound contributions they made to knowledge and religion by

their numerous writings practically built up the culture and civilization o

other countries.

Tis temple o learning met its end at the hands o the Musalmans. Greaternumber o inhabitants o the place were Brahmans many o who were

all slain by them, afer which great books on Hindu religion came under

their observation. On becoming acquainted with the contents o those

books, it was ound that the whole o that ortress and City was a College,

and ,in the Hindu tongue, they called a college Bihar (Vihara).Tis is how

the City o Magadha got its modern name Bihar! Afer its destruction,

Vikramasilas glorious history was hidden away in the ibetan books.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

5/12

5

Nan Yar?(Who Am I?)Pooja Babu

S5 ECE

Introduction

Beore reading this excerpt,

we need a little introspection.

Lets go back to the spiral

ebb o our childhood timeswhen questions, too modest

o this kind, was a twinkle to

our yet-unborn-intellectual

mind. When we were kids, we

probably have wondered ,Why

is the sky blue?, Who showers

rain?, Why does the cuckoo

sing back? but Who am I?

wasnt usually one o them. Back

then as kids all o us were more

occupied with the spectacle

o nature, its unathomable

whims; we were much like thosekittens with little cute eyes looking at every single morning as i it was the

first time .But now, we have almost debarred all our senses rom such little

fixtures o lie that has gifed us the subtle eel o integrity. Most o us go

to college, learn all the logic, master the mysteries o calculus without ever

discovering how our own minds unction. All we know about it is, that

it executes some spectacular mental acrobatics; but we ail to recognize

what sustains the complex rhythm o lie inside it and what is it that

dwells in its deeper recesses and animate everything. And somewhere,

at some juncture o thoughts, amidst the reality structuring mechanisms

o consciousness, we stand with the question which we never wondered

as a kid-Who am I? because by then we were explicitly conditioned to

mouth the answer saying D/o or S/o Mr. and Mrs. But now as we are wise

enough not to get drugged by the conditional ideas, we start giving the

question a cerebral reasoning because it was all what calculus has taught

us. But would that work? Certainly no! Since here again we are trying to

reute a theory or doctrine; something rom the conditional ideas itsel.

Te substratum has not changed. Now we sit, all dazzed, looking or help.

And this is where this excerpt comes to our rescue, to undo the misty

picture o unreality and give a sense o direction. Tis excerpt is slightly

abridged and is taken rom the teachings o the great spiritual master

Ramana Maharshi, compiled by Sri. M. Sivaprakasam Pillai.

Who Am I? (Nan Yar?)

1. Who am I?

Te gross body which is composed o the seven humours (dhatus), I am

not; the five cognitive sense organs I am not; the five vital airs, prana, etc.,

which perorm respectively the five unctions o in-breathing, etc., I amnot; even the mind which thinks, I am not; the nescience too, which is

endowed only with the residual impressions o objects, and in which there

are no objects and no unctionings, I am not.

2. If I am none of these, then who am I?

Afer negating all o the above-mentioned as not this, not this, that

Awareness which alone remains - that I am.

3. What is the nature of Awareness?

Te nature o Awareness is existence-consciousness-bliss.

4. When will the realization of the Self be gained?

When the world which is what-is-seen has been removed, there will be

realization o the Sel who is the seer.

5. Will there not be realization of the Self even while the world is there

(taken as real)?

Tere will not be.

6. Why?

Te seer and the object seen are like the rope and the snake. Just as the

knowledge o the rope which is the substrate will not arise unless the alse

knowledge o the illusory serpent goes, so the realization o the Sel which

is the substrate will not be gained unless the belie that the world is real

is removed.

7. When will the world which is the object seen be removed?

When the mind, which is the cause o all cognition and o all actions,

becomes quiescent, the world will disappear.

8. What is the nature of the mind?

What is called mind is a wondrous power residing in the Sel. It causesall thoughts to arise.

Apart rom thoughts, there is no such thing as mind. Tereore, thought

is the nature o mind. Apart rom thoughts, there is no independent

entity called the world. In deep sleep there are no thoughts, and there is

no world. In the states o waking and dream, there are thoughts, and there

is a world also. Just as the spider emits the thread (o the web) out o itsel

and again withdraws it into itsel, likewise the mind projects the world out

o itsel and again resolves it into itsel. When the mind comes out o the

Sel, the world appears. Tereore, when the world appears (to be real),

the Sel does not appear; and when the Sel appears (shines) the world

does not appear. When one persistently inquires into the nature o the

mind, the mind will end leaving the Sel (as the residue). What is reerred

to as the Sel is the Atman. Te mind always exists only in dependence

on something gross; it cannot stay alone. It is the mind that is called the

subtle body or the soul (jiva).

9. What is the path of inquiry for understanding the nature of the mind?

Tat which rises as I in this body is the mind. One would discover that

heart is the place o the minds origin. O all the thoughts that arise in

the mind, the I thought is the first. It is only afer the rise o this that the

other thoughts arise.

10. Toughts appear wending like the waves of an ocean. When will all

of them get destroyed?

As the meditation on the Sel rises higher and higher, the thoughts will

get destroyed.

11. Is it possible for the residual impressions of objects that come from

beginingless time, as it were, to be resolved, and for one to remain as the

pure Self?

Without yielding to the doubt Is it possible, or not? one should persistently

hold on to the meditation on the Sel. Tere are not two minds - one good

and the other evil; the mind is only one. It is the residual impressions that

are o two kinds - auspicious and inauspicious. When the mind is under

the influence o auspicious impressions it is called good; and when it is

under the influence o inauspicious impressions it is regarded as evil.

12. How long should inquiry be practiced?

As long as there are impressions o objects in the mind, so long the inquiry

Who am I? is required. As thoughts arise they should be destroyed then

and there in the very place o their origin, through inquiry.

13. What is the nature of the Self?

What exists in truth is the Sel alone. Te Sel is that where there is

absolutely no I thought. Tat is called Silence. Te Sel itsel is the

world; the Sel itsel is I; the Sel itsel is God; all is Siva, the Sel.

14. What is non-attachment?

As thoughts arise, destroying them utterly without any residue in the very

place o their origin is non-attachment.

15. Is it not possible for God and the Guru to effect the release of a soul?

God and the Guru will only show the way to release; they will not by

themselves take the soul to the state o release. In truth, God and the

Guru are not different. One can know onesel only with ones own eye o

knowledge, and not with somebody elses. Does he who is Rama require

the help o a mirror to know that he is Rama?

16. Is it necessary for one who longs for release to inquire into the nature

of categories (tatvas)?

Just as one who wants to throw away garbage has no need to analyze it

and see what it is, so one who wants to know the Sel has no need to count

the number o categories or inquire into their characteristics; what he has

to do is to reject altogether the categories that hide the Sel. Te world

should be considered like a dream.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

6/12

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

7/12

7

Belur, Te Jewel Of Indian Architecture

Jayashree

S7 EEE

Can you ever imagine burying an entire place under sand to protect

it rom invaders? Well, as the story goes, that was one o the ways, the

natives o Belur adopted to protect their mother land, when Malik Kaur

and his troops invaded the Hoysala Kingdom.

Belur was once the capital o the Hoysala Kingdom beore it was moved

to Halibedu. Belur is set on the bank o river Yagachi earlier known as

Velapuri. Tis landscape was filled with lush greenery and embossed

with magnificent shrines and monuments, which o high architectural

significance. Tis enchanting land was reerred aptly as Vaikunta on

earth. Tis place is now situated in the Hassan district o Karnataka.

Te Hoysala Kingdom was established by the legendary Sala. He had killed

a tiger in an encounter to protect the lie o his Guru and his countrymen.

Interestingly the tiger became the symbol o the Hoysala kingdom. Sala

extended his kingdom by annexing the surrounding areas belonging to

Chola rulers in subsequent wars.

Let us gaze upon some impressive architectural structures o Belur andits awe inspiring legacy. One has to look at Chenna Keshava temple to

understand and appreciate the artistic genius o this man made wonder.

Just as we are dazzled by the grandeur o this majestic structure, one cant

help but ask What is the story behind this structure?.

King Vishnuvardhana had a dream about Lord Keshava during his nightly

sojourn at the Babu Budan Forest. He decided to construct temple to

gloriy the Lord Keshava. Tere is an interesting sub-tale in this story, as

the King constructed the temple or Lord Keshava alone, it is believed that

the Lord himsel travels to orest to meet his consort during night. Te

daily ritual o submitting a pair o resh sandals to Lord adds credence to

the espoused story.

Te sanctum is star shaped and the hall is cross structured with an

opening to the East. Te architectural significance o the sculptures

bestowed the status o a museum to the temple. Each sculptured figurine

requires a detailed study o art. Quoting the words o James Fergusson

Te amount o labour, indeed, which each acet o the this porch displays

is such as, I believe, never was bestowed on any surace o equal extent in

the world; and though the design is not o the highest order, it is elegant

and appropriate and never offends against any good taste. Te artistic

greatness o the temple can be seen in its basement riezes, railings, piercedstone screens and bracket images. In the railings a prominent pattern o

flowers springing rom a creeper is depicted. On these flowers, scenes

o Mahabharata and Ramayana are portrayed. On the middle panel o

the first screen to the south o east doorway, there is engraving o a king

with long hair, trimmed beard, twirled moustache and estooned with

ornaments; on the lef to the king, queen is seated and the royal couple is

intently listening to the chie seated beside. Queens intervention in court

maters is noticeable. Te basement riezes includes elephants and other

animals in the battlefield, in different moods whereas the bracket figures

are that o the Madanikas or the structures o Mohini. Tese carvings

are chiseled out in soap stone and this makes even minute details o the

sculpture visible and beautiul.

Kappe-Chennigaraya temple, Soumyanayaki, Andal and other Vaishnavamaniestations surround the main temple. Te Kappe-Chennigaraya is to

the south o the main temple built under the orders o Santaladevi, the

chie queen o Vishnuvardhana. Tough comparatively less decorative

it resembles the main temple in its structure and contains finely carved

images o Ganesa, Saraswati, Lakshmi-Narayana, Lakshmi, Sridhara and

Durga in the orm o Mahishasura-mardhini. It is believed that Dasoja

and Chavana (a ather-son duo) were the major architects o Chenna-

Keshava temple hailing rom Balliganve.

Te 42 eet high Gravity pillar, which stands without any support, the

carved image o Krishnaraja Wodeyar, Garudagambha and Garuda, are

the other engravings o interest in this temple complex.

Belur is one such place where a person is intently reminded about hispast, the very realization o what he is and what he can be. Our ancestors

legacy keeps on prompting us to keep on going orward.. We have to take

the lead and shape our destiny.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

8/12

8

Mriga pakshi Shastra

Arun Balakrishnan

Research Associate

Rajas amas

Uttama

Madhyama

Adhama

Te interesting eature o this book is that unlike in modern science a lion

is not just a male or emale. Lions according to Hamsadeva come in six

variants namely - Simha, Mrigendra, Panshasya, Haryaksha, Kesarin and

Hari. Similarly tigers(3), bears(3), rhinos(2), elephant(13), bulls(7) and

many more animals are described.

Behaviour o birds have also been documented in a similar manner by

Hamsadeva, Swan(7), eagles(3), hawks(2), crows(12), etc. Still noteworthy

is how he again goes onto explain the sub-species in each species o a

particular bird. He describes the mating season, conception, period o ull

birth prior to birth o the young ones, description o the young ones and

their growth, distinction by colour, behaviour and species the nature andcharacteristic o the emale, longevity, and ormerly mentioned distinction

by gunas. Te names that Hamsadeva has attributed to the beasts can be

compared to their names mentioned in the great epic, Mahabharata. In a

book published by the Asian Agri-History Foundation on the Mriga-Pakshi

Shastra, this parallel has been drawn. Dr. Nalini Sadhale, in this book,

compares Hamsadevas classification o animals with other notable works

like the Purushasukta o Rigveda which bases classification on dwelling

place o animals, Smritis and Puranas which classifies based on the theory

o creation and Jainas classifies based on number o sense organs.

Te first official English translation o Mriga-Pakshi Shastra rom Sanskrit

was published in 1927 by M. Sundaracharya and V. Krishnaswamy. e

translation itsel ailed to make an impression on renowned ornithologist

Dr. Salim Ali, who in the 16th Azad Memorial Lecture (1978), talks aboutthe not so scientific approach o Hamsadeva.

Even though modern zoology has moved in a direction very different

rom the approach taken by Hamsadeva, his contribution nonetheless was

not trivial, but unortunately has been orgotten. Te english translation

o his eminent work and its reproductions are all that the generation

o today have to learn o the contributions o the Indias long orgotten

zoologist Hamsadeva.

As children we have all grown up with stories rom Panchatantra and

Jataka tales. Tese short stories which used animal and bird characters,

apart rom being rooted to sound morals, never ailed to pique our

intellect. Upon revisiting these stories, we might notice that to everycharacter rom the animal kingdom, a characteristic behavioural trait

was assigned, throughout different narratives. While an ass was but dull-

witted and hardworking, the cat was sly, the ox cunning and the cow and

elephant were just gentle beings. Rather than dismissing this as random

coincidence, a simple observation o some o these animals is proo

enough that they display these definitive traits.

In the case o us humans - homo sapiens, we acknowledge that despite the

physical traits being similar, no two individuals are identical in all respects.

Akin to that different animals o the same species can behave differently.

But, their basic nature may not change drastically; or example a tiger will

always be a carnivore and not otherwise. Nevertheless the personality o

different tigers could be different. Mriga Pakshi Shastra by Hamsadeva

is one such book which explores this aspect and many others o animalsand birds. Tis work is significant in terms o the extensive study and

observation o animal lives, carried out at in an age hundreds o years

beore the onset o modern zoological aids like still or video photography.

Hamsadeva has classified the animals based on their physical appearance

and then describes their temperament and traits, which he appears to

have arrived at as a consequence o their physical traits. Although the

reader may find his detailing and observations on animals like cows,

sheep, etc very extensive, it may seem like a pretty easy thing or him to

do, considering these were animals to be ound in every household in

those days. But what is indeed amazing is that he gives those very same

details when it comes to describing wild animals such as lion, tiger and

elephants in their natural habitat, which were the pristine jungles o India.

About lion, the simha he notes first its yellow colour skin with white

back, long tail and very thick mane, not to mention his almighty roar.

Later goes on to describe in much detail about the beasts preying, mating

rituals and temperaments during different times o the year.

Tese close-quarter scientific observations o the wild beasts make one

marvel at his means and methods o acquiring them. It certainly is above

our imagination, having been accustomed to watching adventurers

on television, making their many orays into the wild, backed up by

considerable crew and gadgets. One has to ponder on this, while keeping

in mind that during the 13th Century A.D. (around when the book seems

to have been written), the orest cover in India was significant. Details o

certain species o auna mentioned in the book cannot be even verified

today, many o them already being extinct. Some others remain severely

endangered.

Mriga Pakshi Shastra categorises animals and birds based on their

nature as Rajas-ic and Tamas-ic; the Sattc-ic guna or goodness can be

attributed only to the humans. He urther classifies the Rajas trait into

Rajasa-Uttama, Rajasa-Madhyama and Rajasa-Adhama and similarly

Tamas into Tamasa-Uttama, Tamasa-Madhyamaand Tamasa-Adhama.

Lions, Elephants, Horses, Bulls,

Cows, Swan, Geese, Garuda

birds (eagles), Parrots, Cuckoos,

Pigeons, Peacocks, etc.

Camels, Wolves, Dogs, Cocks,

Wagtails and Sky Larks

Tigers, Deer, Goats and Hawks Eagles, Cranes, Kaushika birds (owl),

Plava birds (pelican), Tittiri birds

(patridge), Kukkubha birds (pheasant),

Lava birds (quail), Koyashti birds (red

wattled lapwing) and Harita birds

(yellow footed green pigeons)

Hyenas, Rhinoceroses, Bears and

Buffaloes

Ass, Boars, Monkeys, Jackals, Cats,

Rats, Hares, Crows, Herons and

Darwaghata birds (woodpecker)

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

9/12

9

HanumanSucheth Sunil

Aparna R Shreedhar

Many things in Hanumans character attracts us! Being Ramas greatest

devotee, he perormed great eats o valour and physical strength,

had the greatest will power and perormed his actions with admirable

thoroughness. Here I have analyzed various phases in the lie o this great

soul including the good as well as the not so good things about him.

We all know about how Hanuman (Vayuputra) had tried his strength

against the sun god when he was a child and how he receieved various

boons rom various Gods on being blessed by the Sun God. But when

he began to misuse these boons to mar the perormance o the yagas,

the Rishis cursed him, viz., he would not remember his strength until

somebody reminded him. Even Sugriva, his riend did not know this act

about Hanuman. When Bali and Sugriva ell out and became enemies

the reason why Hanuman did not show his ull strength and kill Bali

was because he was not aware o it. Tere are about three or our places

where this weakness o Hanuman seems to have come upon him. When

Bali chased Sugriva, who was ollowed by his our ministers including

Hanuman, through out the world, Hanuman suddenly remembers

about a hill called Risyamukha, just opposite Kishkindha, where owing

to a curse, Bali or anybody sent by him would have his head burst into

thousand pieces i he ventured into it. Hanuman had orgotten this at

first. He remembered it later and that was what saved them all.

Tere was another occasion when he ailed. It was when Bali was killed

and ara (Balis wie) had come to the field o battle and was crying.

Hanuman comes there bravely and tells ara, Give these monkeys proper

orders. Get control over Angada (aras son). Have Bali cremated and then

see your son anointed, and when you observe him seated on the throne,

you will rejoice and orget Valis death. But Hanuman was supposed to

be scheming or Sugriva succeeding Bali. Tis was another case where

a strange lapse o memory occurred. Or maybe Hanuman was striken

with remorse and thought that the proper thing to do was to pass the

crown on to the lawul heir. But ara being wise and prudent rejectedHanumans advice saying that, Angada is nothing to me and seeing him

on the throne is o no concern to me. Besides, when Bali has passed away,

Sugriva succeeds to his authority. Over me, over this kingdom, and over

the ortunes o Angada himsel Sugriva presides.

Another instance o Hanumans orgetulness was during the amous

incident on the battlefield when Ravana had hurled his unerring spear,

sakti at Lakshmana and it had got stuck in his chest. He (Lakshmana)

lost consciousness and ell prone on the ground. Tat is when Sushena

remembers the amous curative herbs on Sanjivani Hill and afer

describing the herb in detail, he asks Hanuman to go and get it. Hanuman

does the leap without any trouble, but when he searches on the hill-top

he orgets the exact description and is unable to find the exact herb. Tis

is why he carries the hill itsel to Sushena and thus enabling Lakshmanasrevival.

Now let us move on to some o the ailures that Hanuman experienced. One

o the instances where the reputed skill o this great person (Hanuman)

ailed was when he was talking to Sita in Ashokavanam. She expresses

her misgivings to Hanuman; she wonders whether it was right or her to

live and cause anxiety to the great brothers or whether it would be best

or her to take her lie and save trouble or so many. Hanuman convinces

her successully that she would be taken away rom the clutches o this

demon king Ravana. But when Sita expressed her hesitation about Rama

and Lakshmana crossing the sea and about the monkey army overcoming

her opressors, Hanuman offers to take her to Ram right away. He orgets

that, unwilling to be detected by anyone, he had reduced himsel to a

very small size. Sita being a nice lady, gently laughed at him. On eeling

a little insulted, Hanuman assumed his strong, real orm. He asked Sita,

You think you cant trust your slender body to me? I am strong enough

to uproot the whole o this Lanka, take all the hills in it, and the men and

women upon it, everybody including Ravana, and put them across the

sea. Tis was ocourse a little exageration on his part. But in modern

days, when any person becomes a warrior and steps into the battlefield, in

order to psyce themselves to fight, they have got to say some absurd things,

to claim that they were all-powerul and could bring the enemy down to

grie. Hanuman didnt have any enemies but he had some critics. So he

had to exaggerate a bit. But Sita still reuses. She says that i Hanuman

took her rom here, the Rakshasas would ollow him and he would have

to fight them while over the water. Even i he successully does so, it was

not right on her part to willully touch any other person other than her

husband Rama. She agrees that Ravana did touch her but that was when

she was not the mistress o hersel. She elt that Rama must come there,

destroy Ravana and his amily, and show the world that nobody dares

to insult Ramas greatness or glory with impunity. Only then her rescue

should ollow. Hanuman was convinced with Sitas argument and said, I

know my strength and thats why I made the offer. Do not think I had any

other motive. Here Hanuman was glad to have ailed, or Sita convinced

him o the right course.

But in spite o his orgetulness, ailures and other weaknesses put together,

Hanuman was still great. His great achievements were impossible to

measure by ordinary standards. Moving on to the exploits o Hanuman,

one o his main achievements was the great leap he took across the sea

to Sri Lanka. Jambavan, wishing to induce Hanuman to undertake the

great leap across the water reminds him o what he did as a baby. He tells

Hanuman, You do not know about yoursel. We want your yojnas. Tus,

Hanuman realizes his true power and takes the leap across the sea. On

reaching Lanka, and afer an elaborate search or Sita, he meets her. Afer

his conversation with her, rather than going back, he decides to do some

mischie! He draws the attention o the guardians o Lanka and even kills

one o Ravanas sons who was known to be a great warrior. Finally when

he was caught by Indrajit by the Brahmastra, he was taken to Ravanas

presence. When they thought they had him well bound, the period o the

Brahmastras potency got over, and he shook himsel ree and sat beore

Ravana. He initially pretends to be a humble emissary o Sugriva; but

then speaks defiantly to Ravana. Angered by his insolent manner, angry

Ravana orders hanumans tail to be set on fire. Hanuman leaps around the

city and burns down the entire city beore returning to Rama. Tis leap

and his subsequent wonderul achievements in Lanka was his first major

exploit.

Te next exploit was when Indrajit had aimed the Brahmastra at the

whole o Ramas army. Tey were all hit and lay prone on the ground. Ten

afer dark, two people were still wide awake-Vibhisana and Hanuman.

Vibhisana had never been struck at all and Hanuman elt the ill-effects

only or a short time. Tey came together and as they went around,

they came upon Jambavan who was struggling hard. On recognizing

Vibhishanas voice he asked i he had seen Hanuman anywhere. Without

answering to his question Vibhishana asked back why he asked him

only about Hanuman. Jambavan in response to this said, I Hanumanis alive, then the whole army will come back to lie. But i he is dead,

then, though we are all alive, we are as good as dead. Without him we are

perectly worthless. On hearing this Hanuman discloses himsel and alls

at Jambavans eet. Jambavan eels that he is born again. He mentions our

herbs o miraculous potency and asks him to bring them. Tese included

the herb which revives the dead, another that heals the wounds caused by

arrows, another that restores the proper colour when the body has been

discoloured by approaching death and the herb which joins the severed

parts o the body. Hanuman then takes the leap to the Himalayas and

searches or the our kind o herbs. But the herbs became invisible when

they got to know that someone was coming or them. When he ound that

they were not to be seen, he had no option but to shif the mountain to

the battlefield. Vayu blew the scent about and as it struck the nostrils o

the dead monkeys, they revived and sat up. Rama and Lakshmana came

back to lie too. It was only because o Hanuman that the whole army

came back to lie.

Another exploit o Hanuman was his second flight to the Himalayan

mountain. It was because o this act o his that Lakshamana was revived

with the medicinal herb. Hanuman perormed extraordinary eats o

strength on the battlefield as well. Not only did he kill Ravanas son Aksha,

but also three Rakshasas, Devantaka, risiras and Nikhumbha.

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

10/12

10

Shareera > Human Body!

Dr. Sharath. S. G. MD (Ayu)

Lecturer, Dept. O Rachana Shareera

Amrita School o Ayurveda.

Te human body or Shareera, as described in Ayurveda literature, is

extraordinarily brilliant and logical. Indain literatures have detailed

descriptions o human body components and its unctions. Te structures

are named and numbered based on their unctions at physiological

(normal) and pathological (abnormal) grounds.

Tere are similarities between the contemporary sciences in certain

aspects. Te current scientific anatomy has reached microscopic level o

understanding the human body, which is o great help in dealing with

many pathological conditions, but the search or that subtle element which

is the cause or the existence is never ending. In Ayurveda the importance

is given or the gross understanding o the human body rather than

microscopic. Te gross understanding was achieved only afer exploring

the subtleness o human body.

Te Shareera is that in which the continuous process o metabolism

happens. Tis is the place where the basic undamental elementsaccompany each other, rationally, or the proper unction o the shareera

and or healthy living. It is the place where the soul resides and provides

the means to attain liberation by ollowing Dharma.

Each Ayurvedic text has a separate section or the description o the

Shareera, which includes both the Anatomical and Physiological eatures.

In Sushruta Samhita, Sharira Sthana, comprising ten chapters, has a

detailed explanations o topics like evolution; embryology, personality,

and most vividly explained is the Anatomical structure o the human

body. Te names given to the structures have a relationship with their

unctions. o understand the ormation and unctions o each structure

many similes have been used.

In the fifh chapter named Shareera Sankhya Vyakarana, all the anatomicalstructures and its numbers are listed. Te enumeration begins rom the

gross level.

Continuation of page 9

Hanuman received appreciation rom Rama in various situations. In their

first encounter itsel, in Kishkindha, the two brothers met Hanuman or

the first time. Hanuman was in the guise o a scholar. His talk o a ew

minutes created a tremendous impression in the mind o Rama. He said

to Lakshmana,For one to speak as this person has spoken, one must

know all the three Vedas and have them at command. Although he spoke

or long, he has not made a single error. He seems to be a great mastero elocution. His speech wins my heart and delights my soul. I a man

can talk like Hanuman, he can bring down to his knees even the most

implacable enemy. Tere is no danger he will not ace, no enemy he will

not encounter; nothing that he will not ace to perorm services to his

master.

Like most people engaged in tasks o great difficulty, Hanuman swayed

between moods o confidence and pessimism. Sometimes he elt he could

accomplish what he had undertaken and at other times he was disposed

to question his capacity to ulfill his obligations.

When Hanuman returned to Rama with Sitas message, Rama was so

happy and he said that, What another man could not even think o

doing, Hanuman has actually perormed or me. He also told Hanuman

I cant give you a suitable reward or bringing me this heavenly message.But I can give you mysel; here is my body; I will embrace you tight; I will

hug you. Hanuman attained his salvation at that moment.

Afer Vibhishanas coronation and final arewell, Rama didnt give

anything to Hanuman. He gave Sita a garland o pearls. Afer wearing it

or a while, she looked around amongst the gathering and then gave it to

Hanuman. What more could Hanuman ask or? Ten, when others were

given leave, Hanuman stood up beore Rama and said to him, Please give

Te list o structures and their numbers.

Twacha - 7layers Skin and its layersKala 7 dierentiation between two tissues

Ashaya 7

Dhatu 7 Basic fundamental tissues

Sira 700 Vascular structures

Peshi 500 (20 extra in emales) Skeletal Muscles

Snayu 900 Ligamentous/Fibrous structures

Sandhi 210 Joints (between bones and sof structures)

Marma 107 Vital and vulnerable areas

Dhamani 24 Pulsating vessels

Srotas 9 Excretory passages

Kandara 16 Fibrous / Ligamentous structure

Jaala 16 Network o Structures

Kurcha 6 Flattened tendinous structure

Rajju 4 Rope like structures

Sevani 7 Sutural joints

Sanghata 14 Confluence o Bones

Seemanta 14 lines over the Skin where Confluence o Bones are

present.

Aantra 2 tubular structures

Asthi 360 Bones

All these structures are enumerated along with their detailed description.

Each structure is explained with its location and how many types are

present in the human body.

Te Anatomical concepts explained in Ayurvedic texts are acceptable

even afer scientific evaluation and practical application.

me this blessing, that my affection or you never diminishes. Do not allow

me to think o any other person or to divide my affection between you and

any other person. I want to live as long as your great name is preserved

amongst the sons o men. Let me be your devotee orever. o this Rama

replies, Let it be as you wish. As long as my story is told amongst men,

your kriti shall orm a part o it. And may your lie last also. Tus,

Hanuman is still remembered whenever we reer to Ramayana.

Tere were also times when Hanumans pessimism was converted intohopeul optimism. One such instance was when Hanuman reached Lanka

he shrank his body to the size o a cat and started looking around or Sita.

He was transgressing the moral code by easting his eyes upon Ravanas

women. Initially he elt, My ate has led me to this place where I have

to see the women o another person lying about and sleeping, the sight

inevitably is causing me to think unworthy thoughts. I have not done

this beore, but I am obliged now to do this improper thing. But then he

thinks, What harm is there? Yes, I have seen the women o Ravana, but

I can say conscientiously that my mind is not in any way affected. Te

senses project themselves and asten upon particular objects only i the

manas directs them to do so. But my manas is ully under my control. I

have come here to look or Sita. Te natural thought is that she might be

ound amongst these women. So I have to look or her here. With this

thought, he searches every nook and corner or Sita.

Tus we can see that there is a lot we can learn rom Hanuman. As students,

we should try to inculcate qualities like hardwork, determination, will

power and dedication to the master (Guru); qualities that were ound

in abundance in him. We may encounter ailures in lie, but we must

consider them as stepping stones to success! We must move on with this

positive attitude in lie.

JAI HANUMAN

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

11/12

Question and Answer session with Amma

continuation of Nan Yar (Who am I) page 5

17. Is there no difference between waking and dream?

Waking is long and a dream short; other than this there is no difference.

Just as waking happenings seem real while awake, so do those in a dream

while dreaming. In dream the mind takes on another body. In both waking

and dream states thoughts, names and orms occur simultaneously.

18. What is happiness?

Happiness is the very nature o the Sel; happiness and the Sel are not

different. When the world disappears, i.e. when there is no thought, the

mind experiences happiness; and when the world appears, it goes through

misery.

19. What is wisdom-insight (jnana-drshti)?Remaining quiet is what is called wisdom-insight. o remain quiet is to

resolve the mind in the Sel. elepathy, knowing past, present and uture

happenings and clairvoyance do not constitute wisdom-insight.

20. What is the relation between desirelessness and wisdom?

Desirelessness is wisdom. Te two are not different; they are the same.

Desirelessness is reraining rom turning the mind towards any object.

Wisdom means the appearance o no object. In other words, not seeking

an unrighteous act that you know is against Dharma, while keeping your

mouth shut is the greatest orm o unrighteousness. Tat is the conduct o

a coward, not a person o courage. Let no one who commits such a

sin think they can escape.Q, Amma, is selfless service possible only i one believes in

God?

Amma: My children, only someone with aith in God can

truly serve others selflessly. But i a person who has no

religious aith is really able to serve others selflessly and

orgive others or their mistakes and shortcomings,

then it doesnt matter whether or not he has any

aith. Tose who are able to do real selfless

service without believing in God are worthy o

our deepest respect.

Q. Amma, it is said that God makes us do

everything. Does it also mean that God is

making us do the wrong things also?

Amma: Son, that is true or someone who

is convinced that everything is Gods work.

In that case, we should be able to see that

everything is given to us by God, both when

we enjoy the ruits o our good actions and

when we suffer the punishment or our

mistakes. God isnt responsible or our mistakes-

we are. Say that a doctor prescribes or us a body-

building tonic. He tells us how much to take and

how ofen. I we ignore his instructions and drink

the whole bottle at once, and i our health is ruined

as a result, what is the point o blaming the doctor? Similarly, i we drivecarelessly and then have an accident, can we blame the gasoline? How, then,

can we blame God or the problems that are caused by our own ignorance?

God has made it perectly clear to us how we should live on this earth. It is

useless to blame Him or the consequences o our not having ollowed His

instructions.

what is other than the Sel is detachment or desirelessness; not leaving the

Sel is wisdom.

21. What is the difference between inquiry and meditation?

Inquiry consists in retaining the mind in the Sel. Meditation consists in

thinking that ones sel is Brahman, existence-consciousness-bliss.

22. What is release?

Inquiring into the nature o ones sel that is in bondage, and realizing

ones true nature is release.

SRI RAMANARPANAMASU

Q. Amma, will there come a time when everyone in the world is good?

Amma: My children, i there is goodness, evil will exist as well. Suppose a

mother has ten children. Nine o them are good as gold and only one is

bad. Tat one bad child is enough to ruin all the others. But because heis there the others will be compelled to call out to god. Tere can be

no world without opposites.

Q. Will God orgive us or the mistakes we made?

Amma: He will orgive us up to a point, but not beyond that. He

will orgive us or whatever mistakes we make unknowingly,

because, afer all, we arent aware o those mistakes. But i

we knowingly do what is wrong, He wont tolerate it

beyond a certain point. Ten He will punish us. Te

little baby calls its ather Dada. Te ather knows

that the baby is calling him and he laughs. But

i the child continues to call his ather Dada

when he is old enough to know better, his

ather wont laugh anymore; he will spank

him. In the same way, i we act erroneously

knowing ully well that what we are doing

is wrong, then God will certainly punish us.

But even that punishment is a orm o

grace. God may punish a devotee

even or a small mistake so that he

will again commit a similar error.

Tat punishment comes rom Gods

boundless compassion or the devotee

and is meant to save him. Its like a light in

the dark.

Q. Amma, is it unavoidable that we have to suffer or every mistake we havemade?

Amma: We have to accept punishment even or small mistakes. Even

Bhishma had to suffer the consequences o his mistake. He just stood there

and watched while Draupadi was being disrobed, didnt he? Tough he

knew that Duryodhana and his brothers would never listen to reason, he

should at least have reminded them o their Dharma. But he didnt. He just

kept quiet. He should have advised those evil doers about their Dharma

regardless o whether or not his counsel would be heeded. Because he

didnt utter a word against, he became a partner in their wicked deed. It

was because o this that he later had to lie on a bed o arrows. Watching

8/14/2019 Samvit - July 2013

12/12

12

Kautilyas ArthasastraLt. Col. K. Krishnan Nair(Retd) (CIR)

Kautilya or Chanakya, as he was sometimes called, was by all standards a

very powerul personality. Like all such men he was a controversial figure

in his time and continues to be so to modern historians. Historically we

identiy him as the author o the Arthasastrs and as being the architect o

the Mauryan Empire. He was a great patriot who had the interest o the

country at heart. He was a politician, administrator and statesman parexcellence.

Modern scholars are not agreed upon the date and authorship o the

Arthasastra in its present orm. Its date, according to various conflicting

views, fluctuates between the 4th century BC and the 3rd century AD.

Tere does not seem to be any historical evidence to suggest an exact

date. Like all other ancient works, the Arthasastra must have passed

through the hands o many copyists. Tere is a group o historians who

date it during the Mayurian period while there are others who eel it was

produced during a later period. A compromise solution has been put

orward by Dr A L Basham. He suggests that it is certain that the work, as

we know it today, is pre-Guptan and is in all probability an elaboration o

Kautilyas original work produced during the Mauryan period. Whatever

may be the historical jugglery taking place regarding its dating andauthorship, the Arthasastra as we know it today is acknowledged as the

monumental work o Kautilya. He dominated the entire field o statecraf

just as Shankara dominated the much more crowded field o philosophy.

Nevertheless his work was completely oregotten or centuries and the

only sign o its existence waste reerence to it in a ew amous works like

the Panchatantra and Neethisara. It was brought out o oblivion in 1905,

when a Sanskrit scholar, Rudrapratap Samashastry o Mysore came across

a manuscript o the work, in the Oriental research Institute, Mysore.

He was the librarian o the Institute and later became its curator. Te

manuscript was in Sanskrit in the grantha script and not in the devanagari.

Dr Shamashastry transcribed, edited and published the Sanskrit version

o the Arthasastra in 1905. He later published an English edition in 1915.

Few more manuscripts were discovered subsequently by other scholars

interested in the subject. It is evident that the original had many scripted

copies which ound their way to the then existing centers o academic

excellence or scholarly analysis.

Kautilyas masterly treatment o political and economic ideologies in his

Arthasastra, makes it abundantly clear that the science o statecraf must

have been studied and developed over a very long period. He does nottake credit or being a pioneer in this discipline; rather he is rank enough

to admit to collecting and compiling the theories o earlier masters and

giving, at the same time, his own views on them rom the practical stand

point o political and social expediencies. It is interesting to note that he

opens his treatise with salutations to two distinguished political thinkers,

Sukra and Brhaspati. He also reers to our or five well known schools o

thought and more than a dozen celebrated authors.

Te reerence to so many earlier authors indicates intense intellectual

activity in the field o political science and economics. Unortunately

none o the earlier works reerred to by Kautilya have survived afer the

appearance o his own authoritative work and the ravages o time. Te

earlier works seem to have been eclipsed by the eminence o Kautilyas

work which continued to be the standard text on these subjects ever since.

Te variety o topics dealt with in the Arthasastra indicates that Kautilyas

brand o political science was not just theoretical; but contained practical

policies to be implemented by the rulers. It is literally a manual or good

governance, the basis or which was always sound economics and social

justice. Te Arthasastra gives the reader an excellent picture o the socio-

economic lie o the citizens o the Mauryan Empire. Te contents o

Kautilyas Arthasastra ully justified its name.

Kautilya advocates moderation, whether in the exercise o power by

the state or in the pursuit o sensual pleasures. Applying this principle

in the field o social morality, he proposes to penalize over indulgence

in sensual pleasures as also untimely abstinence or asceticism. Kautilya

is also opposed to excessive attachment to Dharma, Artha or kama. Inshort, he is against any orm o extremism in matters spiritual, temporal

or sensual. In spite o this idea, he believes in the overriding importance

o economics in all human endeavors. o him both spirituality and

sensuality are rooted in economics.

Te ideal o a balanced lie, Kautalya believes, can be achieved through

discipline, sel-control and certain other virtues. He says that discipline

could be natural or inculcated through sel- effort and education. He

also gives much importance to control o the senses. o him, sel-victory

and equanimity can be attained by restraining sensual pleasures, anger,

greed, vanity, haughtiness and joy. All these are designated as enemies

o mankind. He believes that lie is certainly not meant to be joyless

and dull. He lays great emphasis on moderation in all aspects o lie. His

paradoxical lie, imbued with anatical ervor in fighting the Nandas,single minded devotion in setting up the Mauryan dynasty, aversion

to power or pel in leading a lie o renunciation in a mud hut in the

cremation grounds, created a wealth o legend and lore that finds mention

in many ancient Hindu, Jain and Buddhist literatures. His Arthashastra

is truly an omnibus covering political science, and is also a manual o

practical dos and donts, or kings and rulers o his day, in the art o good

governance and administration, most o which suitably modified could

be relevant even today.

Reference: Kautilyas Arthasastra, Basics and Essence by N. S. Manadiar

Te Editorial Board

Chief Advisor: Lt. Col. K. Krishnan Nair(Retd) (CIR)Editorial Advisors: Dr. P.V Ramanathan(Dept. o English),Br. Rupesh (ME), Br. Sivanandan (Dept o Physics), Mr. Arun S(Dept. o English),

Gayathri N(ECE), Sruthi B(CIR)

Managing Editor: Br Prasanth(Cultural education)

Chief Editor: Balagovinda N K Kartha(S7 ME)

Editor: Neha Kumari (S5 EEE)

Associate Editor: Nishant Anand (S5 EEE)

Sub Editors: Saritha Ravindran (2011 Batch, Ayurveda), Gayathri A(S5 ECE B), Meenu(B.Sc. Sem 5, Biotech)

Designer: N S Ranjith(Graphics)

Please send your comments and suggestions to samvit@am.amrita.edu