Sample CAME

8/7/2019 Sample CAME

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sample-came 1/91

DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

SampleContinuing Airworthiness Management Exposition

(CAME)

according to

Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042/2003Annex I, Part-M, Subpart G

of 20 November 2003

andEC No.1056/2008

and ED Decisions

No. 2003/19/RM of 28/11/2003No. 2008/013/R of 12/12/2008No. 2009/006/R of 24/03/2009

Issue 1 / Revision A Date: 28.10.2009



Sample CAME according to EC No. 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M, Subpart Gof 20 November 2003 and ED Decision No. 2003/19/RM of 28 November2003 Author: Ing. Martin Krenn

DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Introduction

Diese Sample CAME ist in englischer Sprache verfasst, um die Verbindung derVerordnung (EG) Nr. 2042/2003 DER KOMMISSION vom 20. November 2003 undden nur in englischer Sprache verfügbaren AMC Material herzustellen. Das AMCMaterial ist in Bezug auf den Umfang wesentlich bedeutender als das Gesetz. DieErstellung einer CAME in deutscher Sprache ist dann zweckmäßig, wenn derGroßteil der Kunden aus österreichischem Hoheitsgebiet bzw. deutschsprachigemRaum zu erwarten sind.

Diese CAME ist als Beispiel für so genannte freie CAMOs erstellt worden. Das sindfür die Führung der Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit anerkannte Unternehmenmit dem Recht zur Aufrechterhaltung der Lufttüchtigkeit von Luftfahrzeugen in dernicht gewerbsmäßigen Beförderung, bzw. Ballone im Betrieb der gewerblichenBeförderung (Luftbeförderungsunternehmen). Das heißt also nicht verwendbar inZusammenhang mit einem AOC.

Ledigliches Kopieren der Inhalte dient nicht der Erstellung einer CAME, da dieInhalte sehr breit beschrieben sind.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

CAME – Cover sheet

Company name

Address

Telephone number

Fax number

E-mail address

Approval number

Issue/Revision number of the exposition

Issue date of the exposition




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Table of contents

Introduction...............................................................................................................................2 Table of contents......................................................................................................................4 List of effective pages...............................................................................................................7 Revision list ..............................................................................................................................8 Distribution list..........................................................................................................................9 Abbreviation list ......................................................................................................................10 Part 0 General organisation ...................................................................................................19

0.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager.................................................... 19 0.2 General Information.......................................................................................................20

a) Brief description of the organisation .............................................................................20 b) Scope ...........................................................................................................................20 c) Relationship with other organisations...........................................................................21 d) Aircraft managed .......................................................................................................... 22 e) Type of business ..........................................................................................................22

0.3 Management personnel.................................................................................................23 a) Accountable manager...................................................................................................23 b) Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness PCA (person responsible forcontinuing airworthiness) ..................................................................................................23 c) Continuing airworthiness coordination..........................................................................25 d) PCA Deputy..................................................................................................................25 e) Quality manager ...........................................................................................................25

0.4 Management organisation chart ....................................................................................27 a) General organisation chart ...........................................................................................27 b) Personal data ...............................................................................................................28 c) Manpower resources and training policy ......................................................................30

0.5 Notification procedure to the competent authority regarding changes to theorganisation's activities / approval / location / personnel ..................................................32 a) General.........................................................................................................................32 b) Procedure.....................................................................................................................32

0.6 Exposition amendment procedure.................................................................................34 a) General.........................................................................................................................34 b) Procedure.....................................................................................................................34

Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management procedures ....................................................36 1.1 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system utilisation............................................36

a) Bordbuch and/or continuing airworthiness record system............................................36 b) M.E.L. application.........................................................................................................37

1.2 Owner/Operator aircraft maintenance programmes - development & amendment.......38 a) General.........................................................................................................................38 b) Generic/Baseline Maintenance Programme.................................................................38 c) Content of the AMP ......................................................................................................39 d) Development ................................................................................................................39

1.3 Time and continuing airworthiness records, responsibilities, retention, access ............41 a) Hours and cycles recording..........................................................................................41 b) Records ........................................................................................................................41 c) Preservation of records.................................................................................................44 d) Transfer of continuing airworthiness records................................................................44

1.4 Accomplishment and control of Airworthiness Directives..............................................45

a) Airworthiness directive information...............................................................................45 b) Airworthiness directive decision ...................................................................................45




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

c) Airworthiness directive control ......................................................................................45 1.5 Analysis of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme ..........................47 1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy...........................................................48

a) General.........................................................................................................................48 b) Service Bulletins...........................................................................................................48 c) Modifications.................................................................................................................48 d) Minor Modifications.......................................................................................................48 e) Recording of Modifications ...........................................................................................48

1.7 Major modification / repair standards ............................................................................49 a) General.........................................................................................................................49 b) Development and approval of major modification and major repairs ...........................49

1.8 Defect reports................................................................................................................50 a) Analysis ........................................................................................................................50 b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities .................................................51 c) Deferred defect policy...................................................................................................51 d) Non Deferrable Defects policy......................................................................................51 e) Repetitive Defects ........................................................................................................51 f) Mandatory Occurrence Reporting ................................................................................. 51 g) Occurrence Review Meetings.......................................................................................51

1.9 Engineering activity .......................................................................................................53 1.10 Reliability programmes................................................................................................53 1.11 Pre-flight inspections ...................................................................................................54 1.12 Aircraft weighing..........................................................................................................54 1.13 Check flight procedures...............................................................................................55

a) General.........................................................................................................................55 b) Procedures and standards ...........................................................................................55

Part 2 Quality system .............................................................................................................56 2.1 Continuing airworthiness quality policy, plan and audits procedure..............................56

a) Continuing airworthiness quality policy.........................................................................56 b) Quality plan...................................................................................................................57 c) Quality audit procedure.................................................................................................57 d) Quality audit remedial action procedure.......................................................................58

2.2 Monitoring of continuing airworthiness management activities .....................................59 2.3 Monitoring of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme(s)...................59 2.4 Monitoring that all maintenance is carried out by an appropriate maintenance

organisation......................................................................................................................59 2.5 Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out in accordance with the

contract, including sub-contractors used by the maintenance contractor.........................59 2.6 Quality audit personnel..................................................................................................60

Part 3 Contracted Maintenance..............................................................................................61 3.1 Maintenance contractor selection procedure.................................................................61 3.2 Quality audit of aircraft...................................................................................................61

Part 4 Airworthiness Review Procedures...............................................................................63 4.1 Airworthiness review staff..............................................................................................65

4.1.1 Experience, qualification, training and procedure....................................................65 4.1.2 Authorisations.......................................................................................................... 67 4.1.3 Records ...................................................................................................................68

4.2 Review of aircraft records..............................................................................................69 4.3 Physical survey..............................................................................................................69

4.3.1 Physical survey on the aircraft.................................................................................70

4.4 Additional procedures for recommendations to competent authorities for the import ofaircraft...............................................................................................................................72 a) Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU ...............................................................72




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

b) Airworthiness review of used aircraft imported into the EU..........................................72 c) New aircraft from EU or imported from a third country .................................................75

4.5 Recommendations to competent authorities for the issuance of airworthiness reviewcertificates.........................................................................................................................76 4.5.1 Findings ...................................................................................................................77

4.6 Issuance of airworthiness review certificates ................................................................78 4.6.1 Invalidity of the airworthiness review certificate.......................................................79

4.7 Airworthiness review records, responsibilities, retention and access............................79 Part 5 Appendices..................................................................................................................80

5.1 Sample documents........................................................................................................80 a) Bordbuch ......................................................................................................................80 b) Accident / Incident Report ............................................................................................80 c) Quality plan...................................................................................................................80 d) Extension form..............................................................................................................80 e) CAME Recognition Certificate......................................................................................80 f) Document review checklist (example)...........................................................................81 g) Physical review checklist..............................................................................................84 h) Recommendation form for issuance of airworthiness review certificates ..................... 87 i) Annual Review Checklist OMP –Small AC ....................................................................87

5.2 List of airworthiness review staff....................................................................................90 5.2.1 Airworthiness review staff authorisation .....................................................................90 5.3 List of approved maintenance organisations contracted ...............................................91 5.4 List of contracts with owners/operators and their aircraft ..............................................91 5.5 Holders of AMP’s...........................................................................................................91 5.6 List of sub-contractors ...................................................................................................91 5.7 Copy of contracts with approved maintenance organisations .......................................91 5.8 Copy of contracts for sub-contracted work ....................................................................91 5.9 Copy of contracts for the provision of maintenance data by the owner or operator ......91




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

List of effective pages

Page Revision DateIntroduction

Part 0 General organisation

Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management procedures

Part 2 Quality system

Part 3 Contracted Maintenance

Part 4 Airworthiness review procedures

Part 5 Appendices

Approved by Austro Control GmbH…………………………File number

…………………………………… …………………………Signature and Stamp Date




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Revision list1

Issue and Revision Revision incorporatedRevisionnumber

Date Brief description Date Name/Signature

1A 28.10.2009

administrative corrections;incorporation of M.A.901(e),M.A.902(a), (b) & M.A.904(a)Revision of Part 4

1 This section includes all revisions of this manual by date of revision and the effectiveness of therevision/approval by Austro Control GmbH. Each revision has to be entered and noted on the revision list by theholder of the CAME, showing the date of revision and the signature.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Distribution list

This Continued Airworthiness Management Exposition and any subsequent revisionare distributed according to part 0.5 to the following recipients.

Copynumber

Receiver Publicationform2

1. Austro Control GmbH2. Accountable Manager3. Quality Manager4. Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness5.

Each holder of a CAME is personally responsible for the insertion of all revisions. Allresponsible persons shall have a thorough knowledge with the organisation’s CAME.A CAME Recognition Certificate (5.1 e) shall signed by these persons asconfirmation that they have received the document.

All persons concerned by the CAME have to have access.

2 The CAMO may use paper form or electronic data processing or a combination of both methods for publicationof the CAME. However the CAME should be made available in a form acceptable to the recipients.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Abbreviation list

A/C

ACG

AD

AFM

AM

AMC

AMP

AOC

APU ARC

ARS

AWOPS

BMVIT

CAME

CAMO

CAT

CDLCG

CoA

CRS

CVR

DFDR

DO

DOA

EASA

ELA 1 aircraftELT

ETOPS

EU

EU OPS 1

FAA

HIL

IFR

JAR OPS 3JAR 26

Aircraft

Austro Control GmbH (Competent Authority)

Airworthiness Directive

Aircraft Flight Manual

Accountable Manager

Acceptable Means of Compliance

Owner/Operator Aircraft Maintenance Program

Air Operator Certificate

Auxiliary Power Unit

Airworthiness Review Certificate

Airworthiness Review Staff

All Weather Operations

Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie

Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition

Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation

Commercial Air Transport

Configuration Deviation ListCentre of Gravity

Certificate of Airworthiness

Certificate of Release to Service

Cockpit Voice Recorder

Digital Flight Data Recorder

Design Organisation

Design Organisation Approval

European Aviation Safety Agency (Agency)

European Light AircraftEmergency Locator Transmitter

Extended Twin-Engine Operations

European Union

European Union “Commercial Air Transportation Aeroplanes”(Annex III (EEC) No. 3922/91 idgF)

Federal Aviation Administration

Hold Item List

Instrument Flight Rules

Joint Aviation Requirement “Commercial Air TransportationHelicopter”

Joint Aviation Requirement “Additional AirworthinessRequirements for Operations”




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

LBA

LLP

LROPS

LTA

LTH

LTZ

M.E.L.

MM

MNPS

MSG

MO

MOM

NAA

ODAR

OMP

Part 21

Part-M

PCA

PFC

PIC

QM

RNAV

RVSM

SB

SIL

SRM

STC

STCHTC

TCDS

TCH

ZLLV

Luftfahrt- Bundesamt

Life limited Parts

Long Range Operations

Lufttüchtigkeitsanweisung

Lufttüchtigkeitshinweis

Lufttüchtigkeitszeugnis

Minimum Equipment List

Maintenance Manual

Minimum Navigation Performance Standard

Maintenance Steering Group

Maintenance Organisation

Maintenance Organisation Manual

National Aviation Authority

Organizational Designated Airworthiness Representatives

Operations Manual

Annex zur Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1702/2003

Annex I zur Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042/2003

Nominated Post Holder for Continuing Airworthiness (Personresponsible for Continuing Airworthiness)

Pre Flight Check

Pilot In Command

Quality Manager

Area Navigation

Reduced Vertical Separation Minima

Service Bulletin

Service Information Letter

Structure Repair Manual

Supplemental Type Certificate

Supplemental Type Certificate HolderType Certificate

Type Certificate Data Sheet

Type Certificate Holder

Zivilluftfahrzeug- und Luftfahrtgerät-Verordnung




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Compliance list

EC No. 2042M.A.

ED DecisionAMC

Content CAME Reference

301(1) 301 -1-Continuing airworthiness taskPre-flight inspections

1.11

301(2) 301 -2-

Continuing airworthiness taskDefect rectification of defects to anofficially recognised standard (MEL,CDL)

1.1.a, b, 1.5,1.8.a, c

301(3) 301 -3-Continuing airworthiness taskAccomplishment of all maintenance inaccordance with the approved AMP

1.2

301(4) 301 -4-Continuing airworthiness taskAnalysis of the effectiveness of theapproved AMP

1.5, 2.3

301(5) 301 -5- Continuing airworthiness taskContinuing airworthiness tasks

1.4

301(6) − Continuing airworthiness taskAccomplishment of modifications andrepairs

1.7

301(7) 301 -7-Continuing airworthiness taskNon-mandatory modifications and/orinspections

1.6

301(8) − Continuing airworthiness taskMaintenance check flights

1.13

302(a) 302 Aircraft maintenance programme 1.2.a, 1.2.c, 1.2d

302(b) − Aircraft maintenance programmeAmendment and approval by theCompetent Authority

1.2.d (3), (4)

302(c), i,ii 302 (c.1) bis (c.7)Aircraft maintenance programmeIndirect Approval

N/A

302(d), i, ii 302(d)Aircraft maintenance programmeContent of the AMP

1.2 c

302(e) − Aircraft maintenance programmeDetails of the AMP

1.2c

302(f)Aircraft maintenance programmeReliability programme

1.10

302(g)Aircraft maintenance programmePeriodic reviews

1.2d, 5.1i

303 − Airworthiness directives 1.4

304 304 Data for modifications and repairs 1.7

305(a) bis (d) 305(d)Aircraft continuing airworthinessrecord system CRS, logbooks, log cards, content

1.1.a, 1.3, 1.4.c, 1.6.e

305(e) −

Aircraft continuing airworthinessrecord systemInformation relevant to any componentinstalled

1.3.b

305(f) − Aircraft continuing airworthinessrecord systemResponsibility

0.3.b

305(g) − Aircraft continuing airworthinessrecord systemEntries

1.3.b

305(h.1) bis

(h.5)

305(h)Aircraft continuing airworthinessrecord system

Retention periods

1.3.b, c




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

305(h.6) 305(h.6)Aircraft continuing airworthiness recordsystem

1.3.b, c

306(a) 306(a)Owner’s/Operator’s technical log systemContent 1.1.a

306(b) 306(b)Owner’s/Operator’s technical log systemAcceptance and approval by the CompetentAuthority

1.1.a

306(c) − Owner’s/Operator’s technical log systemRetention periods

1.1.a

307(a)bis (c)

307(a)Transfer of aircraft continuingairworthiness records

1.3.d

701 − Scope N/A

702 − Application N/A

703 − Extent of approval N/A

703(c)Extent of approval

Scope0.2.1

704(a)1 − Continuing airworthiness managementexpositionCorporate commitment signed by the AM

0.1

704(a)2 − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition CAMO’s scope of work

0.2.c

704(a)3 −

Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Title(s) and name(s) of person(s) referred to inM.A.706(a), (c), (d) and (i)

0.4.b

704(a)4 − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Organisation chart

0.4.a

704(a)5 − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition List of M.A.707 airworthiness review staff

4.1.b, 5.2

704(a)6 − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Description and location of the facilities

0.2.a

704(a)7 −

Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Procedures specifying how the CAMO ensurescompliance with this Part

0.3, 1.

704(a)8 − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition CAME amendment procedures

0.6

704(a)9

Continuing airworthiness management

exposition List of approved and generic/baselinemaintenance programmes

0.2.1, 5.4

704(b) − Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Approval by the Competent Authority

0.6

− 704(1)

Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Procedures specifying how the CAMO ensurescompliance with this Part

0.3, 1.

− 704(2)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Structure

CAME

− 704(3)


exposition Document structure for a combined Part-145and M.A. Subpart G organisation

N/A

− 704(4)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition

0.4.c




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Personnel should be familiar with those partsof the CAME that are relevant to their tasks.

− 704(5)


exposition Responsibility for the amendment

0.6.b

− 704(6)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition CAME amendment procedures

0.6

− 704(7)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Publication form

Distribution List, 0.6

− 704(8)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Corporate commitment signed by the AM

0.1

− 704(9)Continuing airworthiness managementexposition Corporate commitment signed by the AM

0.1

705 705 Facilities 0.2.a706(a)bis (d)

706Personnel requirementsAM, QM, PCA

0.3.a, b, e

706(e)706(e.1)706(e.2)

Personnel requirementsAcceptance of the PCA by the competentauthority

0.4.b

706(f),(g) 706Personnel requirementsManpower resources

0.4.c

706(h) 706Personnel requirementsTraining recording

0.4.c

− 706(1) bis 706(4)Personnel requirementsQM, PCA

0.4.b

706(i) 706(i)Personnel requirementsExtension staff

0.2.1, 4.8

706(j) Personnel requirementsAM, PCA, Ext. staff

0.4b, 5.2

707(a.1) 707(a)Airworthiness review staff Above 2.730 kg MTOM

4, 4.1.1

707(a.2) 707(a.2)Airworthiness review staff 2.730 kg MTOM and below

4, 4.1.1

707(b) 707(b)Airworthiness review staffAcceptance by the competent authority

4.1.1

707(c) 707(c)

Airworthiness review staffDemonstration of appropriate recentcontinuing airworthiness managementexperience

4.1.2

707(d) -

Airworthiness review staffIdentification by listing each person in the

CAME together with their airworthiness reviewauthorisation reference

4.1.1, 5.2

707(e) 707(e)Airworthiness review staffRecords

4.1.3

708(a) −

Continuing airworthiness management All continuing airworthiness management shallbe carried out acc. to the prescriptions of M.ASubpart C.

Refer toM.A.301-M.A.307




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

708(b.1) −

Continuing airworthiness managementDevelopment and control of aircraft aircraftmaintenance programme and reliability

programme

1.2.c, 1.10

708(b.2) − Continuing airworthiness managementApproval of the AMP by the CompetentAuthority

1.2

708(b.3) − Continuing airworthiness managementManagement of approval of modification andrepairs

0.3.b

708(b.4) − Continuing airworthiness managementEnsure that all maintenance is carried out inaccordance with the approved AMP.

0.3.b

708(b.5) − Continuing airworthiness managementEnsure that all applicable AD’s are applied.

1.4

708(b.6) − Continuing airworthiness managementEnsure that all defects are corrected by an

appropriately approved MO.

1.8

708(b.7) −

Continuing airworthiness managementEnsure that the aircraft is taken to anappropriately approved maintenanceorganisation whenever necessary.

0.3.b

708(b.8) − Continuing airworthiness managementCoordination of maintenance

0.3.b

708(b.9) − Continuing airworthiness managementManagement and archiving of records

1.3.b, c

708(b.10) − Continuing airworthiness managementMass and balance statement

0.3.b, 1.12

708(c) 708(c)Continuing airworthiness managementMaintenance contract

0.2., 0.3.b, 3.1

709(a) − Documentation

Current maintenance data1.2, 1.3 b, 1.4, 1.6, 5.9

709(b) 709DocumentationGeneric/Baseline Maintenance Programme

0.2.1, 1.2b

710(a) 710(a)Airworthiness reviewDocumented review of the aircraft records

4.2

710(b) 710(b) and (c)Airworthiness reviewPhysical survey of the aircraft

4.3

710(c) 710(b) and (c)Airworthiness reviewPhysical survey of the aircraft

4.3

710(d) 710 (d)Airworthiness reviewAnticipation of the airworthiness review

4.6

710(e) 710(e)Airworthiness reviewairworthiness review certificate

4.6

710(f) −

Airworthiness review

A copy of any airworthiness review certificateissued or extended for an aircraft shall be sentto the Member State of Registry

4.6

710(g) − Airworthiness reviewAirworthiness review tasks shall not be sub-contracted

4

710(h) − Airworthiness reviewInconclusive outcome of the airworthinessreview

4.6

711(a) − Privileges of the organisation 0.2, 0.2.1

711(b) 711(b)Privileges of the organisation Additionally privileges

0.2.1, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

712(a) 712(a)Quality system Establishment of a quality system

2.1.a, b, c, d

712(b.1) 712(b.1)Quality system

Monitoring of M.A. Subpart G activities0.3.e, 2.1.a, 2.2

712(b.2) 712(b.2)Quality systemMonitoring that all contracted maintenance iscarried out in acc. with the contract

0.3.e, 2.5

712(b.3) 712(b.3)Quality systemMonitoring the continued compliance of M.A.Subpart G

2.1.a, 2.1.c

− 712(b.4)Quality systemIndependent audit

2.1.c, 2.6

− 712(b.5)Quality systemAnnual check to ensure that all aspects ofM.A. Subpart G are fulfilled

2.1.b, 2.5

− 712(b.6)Quality systemAdditional locations of the organisation

2.1.b

− 712(b.7) Quality systemAudit report

2.1.c

− 712(b.8)Quality systemAudit personnel

2.6

− 712(b.9)Quality systemQuality plan

2.1.b

712(c) − Quality systemRecords

2.1.d

712(d) − Quality systemCombination of the quality system of theCAMO in case of approval with another part

0.2.a

712(e) − Quality systemCommercial air transport

N/A

712(f) 712(f)

Quality system

Replacing the quality system by anorganisational review

0.3, 2.1

713 713Changes to the approved continuingairworthiness organisation

0.5

714(a) − Record-keepingRecord of all details of work carried out

1.3

714(b) −

Record-keepingIf the CAMO has the privilege of M.A.711(b), itshall retain a copy of each ARC andrecommendation issued, together with allsupporting documents

1.3, 4.7

714(c) − Record-keepingRetention periods

4.7

714(d) − Record-keeping

Storage

1.3.c

714(e) − Record-keepingComputer hardware used to ensure backup

1.3.c

714(f) − Record-keepingTransfer of CAM

1.3.d

714(g) − Record-keepingTermination of continuing airworthinessmanagement of the CAMO

1.3.d

− 714(1) bis (6)

Record-keeping(1) CRS, (2) responsibilities,(3) Acceptable form of continuingairworthiness records, (4) Paper systems, (5)Computer systems, (6) Microfilming or opticalstorage

1.3.b, 1.3.c, 1.3.d

715−

Continued validity of approval 0.1, 0.5.b, 2.1.d716(a) −

FindingsLevel 1

2.1.d

716(b) − FindingsLevel 2

2.1.d




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

716(c) − FindingsCorrective action

2.1.d

901 901

Aircraft airworthiness review

Periodically review of aircraft and itscontinuing airworthiness records

4

901(a) 901(a)Aircraft airworthiness reviewIssue of airworthiness review vertificate 4.6

901(b) − Aircraft airworthiness reviewAircraft in controlled environment 4.6

− 901(b)1 and (b)2Aircraft airworthiness reviewAircraft outside a controlled environment 4.6

901(c)1 − Aircraft airworthiness reviewIssue of an ARC for aircraft within controlledenvironment

4.6, 4

901(c)2 901(c)2Aircraft airworthiness reviewValidity of the ARC for aircraft withincontrolled environment

4.6, 4

901(d) 901(d)Aircraft airworthiness reviewRecommendation to Competent Authority forthe issue of ARC

4.5, 4

901(e) 901(e)

Aircraft airworthiness reviewAR and issue of ARC by competent authoritywhen circumstances exist which showpotential safety threat

0.2.1, 4.6, 4

901(f)Aircraft airworthiness reviewExtension of ARC

4

901(g)Aircraft airworthiness reviewELA 1

N/A

901(h)Aircraft airworthiness reviewPotential safety threat

4

901(i)Aircraft airworthiness review

Review by the authority4

901(j)Aircraft airworthiness reviewProvision of documents

4

901(k)Aircraft airworthiness reviewAirworthiness of aircraft

4, 4.6, 4.8

902(a) 1 − Validity of the airworthiness reviewcertificateCases where and ARC becomes invalid

4.6, 4

902(a)2− Validity of the airworthiness review

certificateCases where and ARC becomes invalid

4.6, 4

902(a)3 −

Validity of the airworthiness reviewcertificateCases where and ARC becomes invalid

4.6, 4

902(a)4 − Validity of the airworthiness reviewcertificateCases where and ARC becomes invalid

4.6, 4

902(b)1 −

Validity of the airworthiness reviewcertificateCases where an aircraft must not fly

4.6, 4

902(b)2− Validity of the airworthiness review

certificateCases where an aircraft must not fly

4.6

902(b)3 −

Validity of the airworthiness reviewcertificateCases where an aircraft must not fly

4.6


certificate

Cases where an aircraft must not fly

4.6


certificateCases where an aircraft must not fly

4.6

902(c) − Validity of the airworthiness review 4.6




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

certificateReturn of ARC to the Competent Authority

903(a)1 903(a)1

Transfer of aircraft registration within the

EUApplication

4.4.a

903(a)2 −

Transfer of aircraft registration within theEUApplication

4.4.a

903(b) 903(b)Transfer of aircraft registration within theEUFormer ARC validity

4.4.a

904(a)1 904(a)1Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EUImporting from a third country

4.4

904(a)2 904(a)2Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EUImporting from a third country

4.4

904(a)3 − Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EUImporting from a third country

4.4

904(b) 904(b)Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EURecommendation

4.4

904(c) −

Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EURecommendation

4.4

904(d) −

Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EURecommendation

4.4

904(e) −

Airworthiness review of aircraft importedinto the EU

Recommendation

4.6

905(a)−

FindingsLevel 1

4.5

905(b)−

FindingsLevel 2

4.5

905(c)−

FindingsCorrective action plan

2.1, 4.5




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 0 General organisation

0.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager3

This exposition defines the organisation and procedures upon which the M.A.Subpart G approval of …(organisation’s name) CAMO under Part-M is based.

These procedures are approved by the undersigned and must be complied with, asapplicable; in order to ensure that all the continuing airworthiness activities includingmaintenance of all aircraft under contract in accordance with M.A.201 (e) with…(organisation’s name) CAMO are carried out on time to an approved standard.

It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with

any new or amended regulation published by the EASA from time to time wherethese new or amended regulations are in conflict with these procedures.

Austro Control GmbH will approve this organisation whilst it is satisfied that theprocedures are being followed. It is understood that Austro Control GmbH reservesthe right to suspend, vary or revoke the M.A. Subpart G continuing airworthinessmanagement approval of the organisation, as applicable, if Austro Control GmbH hasevidence that the procedures are not followed and the standards not upheld.

Suspended or revoked approval could invalidate the CoA.

Signed ....................................................... Dated ..................................................(…name…/Accountable Manager)

For and on behalf of ...(organisation’s name) CAMO ...

3 The accountable manager's exposition statement should embrace the intent of this paragraph and in fact thisstatement may be used without amendment. Any modification to the statement should not alter the intent.

In the case of proposed changes in personnel not known to the management beforehand, these changes shallbe notified at the earliest opportunity.

Whenever the accountable manager is changed it is important to ensure that the new accountable managersigns this statement at the earliest opportunity as part of the acceptance by the approving competent authority.Failure to carry out this action invalidates the M.A. Subpart G continuing airworthiness management approval(or the air operator’s certificate).




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

0.2 General Information

a) Brief description of the organisation

…(organisation’s name) CAMO... is a Part-M, Subpart G approved organisationwhich is structured under the management of …(AM’s name)… . A Quality System isestablished which works independently and monitors all activities on the continuingairworthiness management-system to ensure that it remains in conformity with theapplicable Part-M requirements. For the complete management structure refer to theorganisations management chart in paragraph 0.4. …(organisation’s name) CAMO... holds the privileges according Part-M, Subpart G to manage the continuingairworthiness of non-commercial air transport aircraft as listed on the approvalcertificate.

…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... is authorised to develop GMPs and IHPs throughthe indirect approval procedure.

b) Scope

The scope reflects the privileges of the organisation (M.A. 711) and should be held common .

Aircraft

4

Management

Sub

contractingtasks

Airworthiness

Review Extension

Generic Maintenance

Program

Cessna 100 SeriesCessna 152

X/-X/-

--

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

GMP_xyz_C100 SeriesGMP_xyz_C152


X/-X/-

--

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

see example above


X/-X/-

--

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

see example above

Cessna 525 SeriesCessna 525 A

X/-X/-

--

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

see example above

Piper PA 28 SeriesPiper PA 44

X/-X/-

--

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

GMP_xyz_PA28 SeriesGMP_xyz_PA44

Airbus A319,A320, A321 SeriesAirbus A319

X/-

X/-

X/-

X/-

X/-

X/-

X/-

X/-

GMP_xyz_A319, 320,321 SeriesGMP_xyz_A319

Cessna 500 SeriesCessna 560 XL

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

see examples above

4TCDS designation




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Dassault FalconMF F 900 EX

X/- X/- X/- X/-see examples above

Bombardier GlobalBD-700-1A10


BD-100-1A10(Challenger 300)


Learjet 55 SeriesLearjet 60

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

X/-X/-

see examples above

The continuing airworthiness management organisation shall provide suitable office

accommodation at appropriate locations for the personnel specified in 0.4 in thisCAME.5

The location of the office accommodations for the proper performance of thecontinuing airworthiness management are in … (Organisation’s address)…

Office accommodation for aircraft airworthiness reviews includes:

a) an office with normal office equipment such as desks, telephones,photocopying machines etc. whereby the continuing airworthiness records canbe reviewed.

b) a hangar when needed for the physical survey.

c) Relationship with other organisations

(This paragraph may not be applicable to every organisation.)

(1) Subsidiaries / Mother Company

For clarity purpose, where the organisation belongs to a group, this paragraph shouldexplain the specific relationship the organisation may have with other members ofthat group. - e.g. links between …(organisation’s name) CAMO... Airlines,…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... Finance, …(organisation’s name) CAMO...Leasing, …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... Maintenance, etc... .

(2) Consortiums

Where the organisation belongs to a consortium, it should be indicated here. Theother members of the consortium should be specified, as well as the scope oforganisation of the consortium [e.g. specifying this is that consortium maintenancemay be controlled through specific contracts and through consortium's policy and/orprocedures manuals that might unintentionally override the maintenance contracts. Inaddition, in respect of international consortiums, the respective competent authoritiesshould be consulted and their agreement to the arrangement clearly stated. Thisparagraph should then make reference to any consortium's continuing airworthiness

5Please describe your specific office accommodation.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

related manual or procedure and to any competent authority agreement that wouldapply.

d) Aircraft managed

…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... holds the privileges according Part-M, Subpart Gto manage the continuing airworthiness of non-commercial air transport aircraft aslisted on the approval certificate. A detailed list of owners/operators and their aircraft…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... is responsible to manage the continuingairworthiness is shown in Part 5.4.

e) Type of business

The organisation is orientated to manage aircraft from general aviation, pilot’straining schools, commercial hire and commercial operations without AOC(Luftverkehrsbeförderungsunternehmen).




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

0.3 Management personnel

The management personnel will be formally accepted by ACG if the personnel meets the requirements of M.A. 706. Therefore the AM has to forward the filled in EASAForm 4 with the relevant data of the proposed management personnel to ACG.The EASA Form 4 is not necessary for the nomination of the PCA Deputy. It is acceptable for ACG to mention the deputy in chapters 0.3 and 0.4 of this CAME.

a) Accountable manager6

The Accountable Manager has the overall responsibility to meet the requirements ofPart-M. He is responsible to ensure that all continuing airworthiness activities can befinanced and are carried out to the required standards. In particular, he isresponsible for ensuring that adequate contractual arrangements exist. Thisincludes, amongst others, provision of: facilities, material and tools, sufficientcompetent and qualified personnel in relation to the work to be undertaken. All of thiswith a view to ensure that all due continuing airworthiness activities includingmaintenance is performed on time and in accordance with the applicablerequirements, regulations and approved standards and that the aircraft has a validCertificate of Airworthiness for all flights undertaken.

The Accountable Manager has the financial responsibility for all of the continuingairworthiness activities.

b) Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness7 PCA (person

responsible for continuing airworthiness)

(1) General

The PCA is responsible for determining what maintenance is required, when it has tobe performed and by whom and to what standard, in order to ensure the continuedairworthiness of the aircraft being operated.

(2) Responsibilities

He/she will, ensure that all maintenance is carried out on time and to an approvedstandard. For every aircraft managed in the continuing airworthiness organisation

the PCA has the following responsibilities:a) Establishment of continuing airworthiness management contract in

cooperation with the owner/operator.

b) Establishment and development of continuing airworthiness policy, includingthe approval of the aircraft maintenance programme’s required by PartM.A.302.

6This paragraph should address the duties and responsibilities of the accountable manager as far as Part M.A.subpart G is concerned and demonstrate that he has corporate authority for ensuring that all continuingairworthiness activities can be financed and carried out to the required standard.

7Dependent on the size and complexity of the organisation the duties and responsibilities associated with thepost holder for continuing airworthiness can be assumed by the AM if competent to do so or a designatedperson, in support of the AM.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

c) Presenting on behalf of the owner/operator aircraft maintenance programmesand its amendments to Austro Control GmbH for approval and provide a copy

of the programmes to the owner.d) Analysis of the effectiveness of the Aircraft Maintenance Programme as

required by Part M.A.708(b) & Appendix 1 to AMC M.A.302.

e) Ensuring that the Quality System required by Part M.A.712 is effective in itsapplication and any follow up actions required to address findings.

f) Ensuring that owner’s/operator’s technical records are kept as required byPart M.A.305 and in accordance to part 1.3 of this CAME.

g) Ensuring the validity of CoA.

h) Presenting the continuing airworthiness records to Austro Control GmbH on

request.

i) Ensuring work planning and follow up

j) Ensuring technical follow up

k) Ensuring that modifications and repairs (changes) are carried out to anapproved standard

l) Review of Airworthiness Directive status and ensure embodiment

m) Non mandatory modification embodiment policy

n) Ensuring that line and base maintenance is contracted whenever necessary

o) Ensuring that the Certificate of Airworthiness for each aircraft managed by thecompany remains valid in respect of;

(i) the airworthiness of the aircraft, and

(ii) any other condition specified in the Certificate

p) Reporting any occurrences (according national law) to register NAA, EASAand the aircraft manufacturers. This includes both operational occurrencesand occurrences related to maintenance findings, which fall outside theMandatory scheme.

q) Ensuring that all defects discovered during scheduled maintenance orreported are corrected by an appropriately approved maintenanceorganisation.

r) Ensuring that the aircraft is taken to

(i) an approved maintenance organisation whenever necessary, or

(ii) that non-complex maintenance -when not performed by a Part-145 or PartM-F organisation- is carried out by authorised persons (Part-66 certifiedstaff, Pilot/Owner)

s) To coordinate scheduled maintenance, the application or airworthinessdirectives, the replacement of service life limited parts and componentinspection to ensure the work is carried out properly.

t) Ensuring that the mass and balance statement reflects the current status ofthe aircraft.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

u) Initiate the airworthiness review or perform the airworthiness review to issuean ARC or send the recommendation to the responsible register NAA.

c) Continuing airworthiness coordination8

It is a task for PCA to establish the communication from the owner/operator to theCAMO as specified in the contract.

d) PCA Deputy

In case of lengthy absence of the PCA, his deputy has to take over his authority. Hehas, however, to confer with the PCA before making any essential decisions andkeep him informed about any major irregularities in technical cases.

A deputy PCA has to be nominated. Deputising situations are lengthy absence of the

PCA due to vacations, illness or training. His/her qualification to fulfil this position fora period of time will be verified by the PCA and/or the AM.

Austro Control GmbH, as the competent authority, shall be informed accordingly forabsence longer then the above period and will accept his position if adequatequalification can be shown.

e) Quality manager

The Quality Manager is responsible for the following functions:

a) Monitoring that all M.A. Subpart G activities are being performed inaccordance with the approved procedures, and;

b) Monitoring that all tasks of continuing airworthiness management are carriedout in accordance with the concluded contracts, and;

c) Monitoring the continued compliance with the requirements of Subpart G, and;

d) Monitoring and amending of the CAME and the submission of proposedamendments to Austro Control GmbH, and;

e) Ensuring that all maintenance is performed in compliance to the qualitystandards defined, and;

f) Correspondence with the authority, and;

g) Ensuring that all continuing airworthiness documentation is used properly andaccordingly, and;

h) Monitoring all company hand books, and;

i) Performing a quality surveillance on the continuing airworthiness system, and;

j) Proposing all corrective action necessary for eliminating non-compliance, andensuring that these corrective actions are initiated, completed and efficient tomeet the intended purpose, and;

8This paragraph should list the job functions that constitute the "group of persons" as required by M.A.706(c) in

enough detail so as to show that all the continuing airworthiness responsibilities as described in Part M arecovered by the persons that constitute that group. In the case of small organisations, where the "NominatedPost holder for continuing airworthiness constitutes himself the "group of persons", this paragraph may bemerged with the previous one.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

k) Monitoring all sub-contracted activities, and;

l) Review and implementation, as appropriate, of any additional national

requirements.

The QM when performing audits shall not be involved or responsible for CAMO-functions. A report of audits carried out must be made to the AM, so that appropriatecorrective measures can be taken if deemed necessary.

For small organisation without the privilege of M.A.711(b) the quality system can bereplaced by an organisational review for a small organisation. Further details areprovided in Part 2.1 of this CAME.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

0.4 Management organisation chart

a) General organisation chart9

9This flow chart should provide a comprehensive understanding of the whole company's organisation.

QualityManager

PCA - Personresponsible for

Continuing Airworthiness

PCADeputy

AirworthinessReview Staff

Continuingairworthinessmanagement

Personnel

AccountableManager




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

b) Personal data

Nominated person (2) PCA - Person responsible for continuing airworthiness & (3)PCA Deputy or group of persons should have:

1. practical experience and expertise in the application of aviation safety standardsand safe operating practices;

2. a comprehensive knowledge of relevant parts of operational requirements andprocedures;

3. knowledge of quality systems;

4. five years relevant work experience of which at least two years should be fromthe aeronautical industry in an appropriate position;

5. a relevant engineering degree or an aircraft maintenance technician qualificationwith additional education acceptable to Austro Control GmbH.‘Relevant engineering degree’ means an engineering degree from aeronautical,mechanical, electrical, electronic, avionic or other studies relevant to themaintenance and continuing airworthiness of aircraft/aircraft components;

The qualification mentioned in this paragraph may be replaced by 5 years of experience additional to those recommended by paragraph 4 above. These 5 years should cover an appropriate combination of experience in tasks related to aircraft maintenance and/or continuing airworthiness management (engineering)and/or surveillance of such tasks.

6. thorough knowledge with the organisation's continuing airworthinessmanagement exposition;

7. knowledge of a relevant sample10 of type(s) of the aircraft gained through aformalised training course;

These courses should be at least at a level equivalent to Part-66 Appendix III Level 1 General Familiarisation and could be imparted by a Part-147 organisation, by the manufacturer, or by any other organisation accepted by the competent authority.

For all balloons and any other aircraft of 2730 kg MTOM and below the formalised training courses may be replaced by demonstration of knowledge.This knowledge may be demonstrated by documented evidence (e.g. training on the job with signed records by certifying staff) or by an assessment performed by the competent authority. This assessment should be recorded.

8. knowledge of maintenance methods.

9. knowledge of applicable regulations.

10 “Relevant sample” means that these courses should cover typical systems embodied in those aircraft being

within the scope of approval.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

(1) Accountable Manager

Name:Nationality:Address:

Tel.:Fax:E-mail:

Qualifications:

Experience:

(2) PCA - Person responsible for continuing airworthiness


Tel.:Fax:E-mail:

Qualifications:

Experience:

(3) PCA Deputy


Tel.:Fax:E-mail:

Qualifications:

Experience:

(4) Quality Manager

Name:

Nationality:Address:




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Tel.:Fax:

E-mail:

Qualifications:

Experience:

c) Manpower resources and training policy

(1) Manpower resources11

…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... will at all times employ sufficient appropriatelyqualified staff to ensure, that the expected work can be performed and that all duties

can be fulfilled.

As of …(date)…, the number of employees dedicated to the performance of thecontinuing airworthiness management system is the following:

Full time Part time FreelanceFunction

No. h No. h No. hAMPCAQM

ARS*Sum

No. … Number of persons

h … Man hours/year

* Further details are provided in 5.2 “List of airworthiness review staff” of this CAME.

If the amount of aircraft changes, the manpower resources plan should also be updated.

(2) Training policy12

Training will be provided by …(organisation’s name) CAMO ... to ensure that eachmember of staff is adequately trained to carry out the functions of, and satisfy theresponsibilities associated with, the Part-M Subpart G continuing airworthinessmanagement functions.

Training will be carried out at regular intervals, taking into account of changes in:

11This paragraph should give broad figures to show that the number of people dedicated to the performance ofthe approved continuing airworthiness activity is adequate. It is not necessary to give the detailed number ofemployees of the whole company but only the number of those involved in continuing airworthiness.

12This paragraph should show that the training and qualification standards for the personnel quoted above areconsistent with the size and complexity of the organisation. It should also explain how the need for recurrenttraining is assessed and how the training recording and follow-up is performed.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

a) CAME

b) Aircraft maintenance programme

c) New aircraft type and novel type of aircraft

d) Organisation

e) New equipment

f) Company procedures

The staff member shall be made aware of how these changes affect their duties andresponsibilities and the company procedures. The PCA will review training needs atintervals not exceeding two years. Continuation Training consists of procedures-, regulation- and technical training.

Aircraft type rating training for staff shall be carried out at a training organisation,which is acceptable to Austro Control GmbH. Whenever possible, the PCA shallensure that the specific type training is carried out at the aircraft manufacturer’srecommended training facility. If practicable and possible, the training may also becarried out by the PCA, as applicable for minor tasks.

It’s the responsibility of the PCA that each training is documented and that thetraining recordings are stored in the personal files required for each staff for at leasttwo years after the relevant staff has left.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

0.5 Notification procedure to the competent authority regarding

changes to the organisation's activities / approval / location /personnel13

a) General

When important changes are made within the company, Austro Control GmbH has tobe informed prior to incorporating proposed changes so that approval can begranted. These changes include, but are not limited to:

a) The name of the organisation

b) The location of the organisation

c) Additional locations of the organisationd) The accountable manager

e) Any of the persons specified in part 0.3

f) Continuing airworthiness management procedures that could affect theapproval

g) Scope of work / Aircraft managed

h) Staff that could affect the approval (functions in Part 0.3 in this CAME andairworthiness review staff in Part 4.1 in this CAME)

In the case of proposed changes in personnel not known to the managementbeforehand, these changes shall be notified at the earliest opportunity. Notificationsto Austro Control GmbH are issued by the QM.

b) Procedure

The changes must be recorded in the CAME and handed over to Austro ControlGmbH for approval. The last approved issue of the CAME is valid until theamendments have been approved.

Once the approval has been granted, the QM has to ensure that all necessarymeasures are taken to comply with the revised CAME and shall ensure that the

changes are noted in any other existing issues of the CAME.All relevant personnel as stated in the distribution list have to confirm that they havereceived the amendment by signing a company internal amendment notification(CAME Recognition Certificate (5.1 e))).

If the AM is changed, the QM has to ensure that the AM signs the corporatecommitment (Part 0.1) at the earliest opportunity.

13This paragraph should explain in which occasion the company should inform the competent authority prior to

incorporating proposed changes.The primary purpose of this paragraph is to enable the continuing airworthiness organisation to remainapproved if agreed by the competent authority during negotiations about any of the specified changes. Withoutthis paragraph the approval would automatically be suspended in all cases.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

If this notification procedure is not applied the Part-M Subpart G approval wouldautomatically be suspended in all cases. Upon surrender or revocation, the approval

certificate shall be returned to Austro Control GmbH.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

0.6 Exposition amendment procedure14

a) General

It is necessary to comply with any new or amended regulation published by theauthority from time to time. New or amended procedures should not be in conflictwith the regulation. Regulation changes as well as any relevant changes within thecompany that affect the approved CAME therefore call for an amendment thereof.

b) ProcedureThe QM is responsible for any amendments and revisions of the CAME including anyassociated manuals, as well as for the submission to Austro Control GmbH forapproval.

The following amendment procedure has to be followed:

a) The QM checks if the amendment is in compliance with Part-M.

b) In case of amendments or changes of contents the related page has to bereplaced.

c) Changed text passages have to be marked with a vertical line at the side ofthe page.

d) In the footer the revision number and the date has to be changed.

e) In the list of effective pages the revision and date of the appropriate page hasto be changed.

f) After the approval the revision has to be added to the exposition by replacingthe old pages.

g) The approved revision pages have to be distributed to the recipients accordingto the distribution list.

h) Each revision has to be entered and noted on the revision list by the holder ofthe CAME, showing the date of revision and the signature.

i) The staff has to be advised about the changes.

If agreed by the competent authority minor amendments to the exposition (changes which have no impact on the approval held) may be approved through an indirect approval procedure .

Minor amendments are:

• Change of number of aircraft used and already approved as type on EASAForm 14

• Change of increasing manpower resources, except personnel needing EASAForm 4

14 This paragraph should explain who is responsible for the amendment of the exposition and submission to thecompetent authority for approval.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

• Adding of new maintenance contracts to chapter 5 after approval of thecontract by ACG

• Change of the number of aircraft in the maintenance contract when the type isalready contained

• Editorial changes

• Changes in reference to other manuals or paragraphs

This approval procedure shall also be stated in the CAME and the related pages shall be forwarded to ACG for notification. For the numbering of revisions, digits for direct amendments and letters for indirect amendments should be used in ascending order (see example below).

E.g.:

- 1A: First direct amendment and following first indirect amendment of theCAME

- 2C: Second direct and following third indirect amendment

Hand written amendments or revisions are not permitted.

The CAME will be reviewed at intervals not exceeding 12 months or more frequentlywhen significant changes occur which affect the content of the CAME.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 1 Continuing airworthiness management

proceduresThis Part 1 defines the continuing airworthiness management procedures which…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... uses to ensure compliance with the continuingairworthiness aspects of Part-M. Where some aspects of these functions are sub-contracted then this will be clearly defined in the text.

1.1 Aircraft continuing airworthiness record system utilisation

a) Bordbuch and/or continuing airworthiness record system

(1) GeneralThe Bordbuch is a main part of the continuing airworthiness record system. Thecontent of an AOC technical log, an aircraft journey log or a Bordbuch are equivalentfor the usage in non-commercial air transport. In special cases (technical defects)additional sheets with relevant information can be attached to the Bordbuch. TheBordbuch contains the following information:

Section 1 This section details the owner’s/operator’s name and address, theaircraft type and the registration on the first page of the Bordbuch.

Section 2 This section contains information about maintenance:

• Details of when the next scheduled maintenance is due,including any out of phase component changes due before thenext maintenance check.

• The current CRS as a stamp or a sticker (column 14, 15)

Section 3 The following details are provided in this section:

• the aircraft type and registration mark

• Date and place of take-off and landing (column 2, 6, 8)

• The times at which the aircraft took off and landed (column 7, 9)

• The running total flying hours (column 11)

• Details of any failure, defect or malfunction to the aircraftaffecting airworthiness or safe operation (column 15)

• The quantity of fuel and oil uplifted (column 12, 13)

• The pre-flight inspection signature

• The number of landings if relevant for aircraft or aircraftcomponent life

Section 4 This section is normally not used for non-commercial air transport. If it

would be used it would contain the acceptable deferred defects pages (hold item list) as column 15 of the Bordbuch. Refer to 1.1 b) M.E.L.application in this CAME.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Section 5 This section details the maintenance support information on the lastpages of the Bordbuch.

This includes:

Name, address, telephone number, and E-mail address of the CAMO(PCA)

In the event that unscheduled maintenance and/or defect rectification is required tobe carried out away from main base, by another approved maintenance organisation,the prior agreement of the primary maintenance contractor must be sought.

The organisation carrying out such maintenance will be required to issue a Certificateof Release to Service in the Bordbuch.

The Bordbuch must be retained 36 months after the date of last entry in a locked, fire

and flood resistant area. For a sample see 5.1 a).

(2) Instructions for use

While the PCA is responsible for maintaining and completing the continuingairworthiness record system, the Bordbuch is completed by the owner or operator’spilots. It shall always be carried on board. … (organisation’s name) CAMO ... must beinformed in regular intervals about the current running total flying hours of the aircraftby the owner/operator for planning the next maintenance event.

(3) Aircraft technical log approval

If an other document than the Austrian Bordbuch is used as aircraft technical log, thisdocument and also any further changes must be approved by Austro Control GmbH.The PCA is responsible for submitting the aircraft technical log and any subsequentamendment thereto to Austro Control GmbH. Refer to part 5.1.

b) M.E.L. application

This paragraph does not apply to those types of aircraft that do not have a MEL orare not used for commercial air transport and that are not required to have one. Thatdoes not mean that an application of a MEL is not allowed for non-commercial airtransport. In this case an application has to be sent to Austro Control GmbH

department Flugtechnik.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.2 Owner/Operator aircraft maintenance programmes -

development & amendmenta) General

Maintenance of each aircraft shall be organised in accordance with an approvedaircraft maintenance programme. The term “aircraft maintenance programme”includes scheduled maintenance tasks, the associated procedures and standardmaintenance practices. The purpose of this aircraft maintenance programme is toprovide maintenance planning instructions necessary for the airworthiness of theaircraft. Any aircraft may only be maintained to one approved aircraft maintenanceprogramme at any given time.

b) Generic/Baseline Maintenance Programme

In order to achieve a scope extension for privately operated aircraft type(s), the PCAhas to create a generic/baseline maintenance programme. In this case the AustrianLTH 43A Appendix B shall be used as a guideline. In contrast to the serial number-related AMP, generic/baseline maintenance programmes are not subject to approvalby ACG. Nevertheless the CAMO has to forward each new generic/baselineprogramme together with the revised CAME pages to ACG for evaluation. Aftersuccessful evaluation, ACG will approve the scope extension of the CAMO throughthe direct approval of the CAME.

Generic/baseline maintenance programmes can subsequently be used as a basis for

the aircraft maintenance programme by incorporating the additional associatedmaintenance tasks. Therefore the applicant has to describe the procedures andimportant points (e.g. no deviation from the maintenance data is permitted, followingof repetitive maintenance tasks for modifications and repairs…) for the developmentof the AMP in the CAME in order to satisfy the competent authority for the properaccomplishment of an AMP. Once these procedures are approved by ACG, theCAMO gets the privilege to approve their self developed AMP (the four-eyes principlehas to be used; E.g: Performed by PCA, approved by QM). Nevertheless always thefirst developed AMP of each type has to be forwarded to ACG for approval!Thereafter all internal approved AMPs have to be forwarded to Austro Control for

notification.A current list of generic/baseline maintenance programmes and their associatedaircraft series/types is shown in chapter 0.2.

For large aircraft paragraph M.A.30215 is applicable only.

A detailed list of all owners/operators, their aircraft and the associated AMP’s(organisation’s name) CAMO ... is responsible to manage the continuingairworthiness is shown in Part 5.

15 Appendix I to AMC M.A.302 (a) and M.B.301 (d) should be used as a guideline for developing this paragraph.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

c) Content of the AMP16

The aircraft maintenance programme contains the following basic information:

a) The type/model and registration number of the aircraft, engines, propellers,…

b) The name and address of the owner, operator and continuing airworthinessmanagement organisation.

c) Check periods and/or calendar time limits.

d) The tasks and periods at which each part of the aircraft and its equipmentshould be inspected including the type and degree of inspection required.

e) The periods at which components should be checked, cleaned, lubricated,replenished, adjusted and tested.

f) Details of ageing aircraft system requirements and/or details of specificstructural aircraft aircraft maintenance programmes.

g) The periods at which overhauls and/or replacements of components should bemade.

h) Repetitive maintenance tasks derived from modifications and repairs.

d) Development

(1) Sources

The aircraft maintenance programme shall establish compliance with:a) Instructions issued by Austro Control GmbH (LTH, LTA)

b) Instructions for continuing airworthiness issued by the holders of the typecertificate, restricted type-certificate, supplemental type-certificate, majorrepair design approval, ETSO authorisation or any other relevant approvalissued under Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 and its Annex (Part-21)

c) Additional or alternative instructions proposed by the owner or the CAMO ifapproved by Austro Control GmbH, except for intervals of safety related tasks.These instructions could only be escalated through a direct approval and aftersufficient reviews.

d) For large aircraft a reliability programme must be used and described inchapter 1.10.

(2) Responsibilities

The AMP is developed by the PCA based upon the original manufacturer’smaintenance instructions, and endorsed by him. Any aircraft maintenanceprogramme is subject to approval by Austro Control GmbH based by applicationmade by the operator.

16This paragraph should explain what is (are) the format(s) of the company's owner/operator aircraft maintenanceprogramme(s). Appendix I to AMC M.A.302 (a) and M.B.301 (d) should be used as a guideline to develop thisparagraph.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

A detailed list of all holders of AMP’s … (organisation’s name) CAMO ... is shown inPart 5.

(3) Manual amendments

If necessary (revision of the manufacturer’s documentation, result from the analysisof the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance programme, change of TC-holdermaintenance instructions, etc…), a Manual amendment will be prepared by the PCAand/or the QM. If no other necessities arise, the aircraft maintenance programmeshall be reviewed annually by the PCA. A list of items to be checked during thereview is attached in 5.1 i of this CAME (example for small aircraft ).

(4) Approval by the authority

After preparation the amendment will be presented to Austro Control GmbH by the

PCA for approval and if found acceptable, inserted in the relevant AMP by him. ThePCA is responsible for submitting each amendment for approval to Austro ControlGmbH. Amendments based on changes of approved data issued by the TCH neednot to be approved by Austro Control GmbH. ACG has to be informed about suchchanges.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.3 Time and continuing airworthiness records, responsibilities,

retention, access

a) Hours and cycles recording

Flight hours and cycles are recorded in the Bordbuch and thus supplied to the PCA.…(organisation’s name) CAMO ... must be informed in regular intervals, dependingon the utilisation, about the current running total flying hours and cycles of the aircraftby the owner/operator for planning the next maintenance event. This has also to bespecified in the contract.

b) Records

Continuing airworthiness records comprise:a) Applicable maintenance data for managed aircraft.

a.1) Any applicable requirement, procedure, standard or information issued byAustro Control GmbH, acquired directly from Austro Control GmbH.

a.2) Any applicable airworthiness directive, acquired as described under 1.4.

a.3) Applicable instructions for continuing airworthiness, issued by typecertificate holders, supplemental type certificate holders and any otherorganisation that publishes such data in accordance with Part 21 (i.e.copies of the relevant AMM and similar documentation and SB’s ordered

directly from the issuer).a.4) Any applicable data issued in accordance with 145.A.45(d) if applicable.

b) An aircraft logbook.

c) Engine logbook(s)

d) Propeller logbook(s)

e) Records of any service life limited components.

f) A certificate of release to service for any completed maintenance.

g) A status of airworthiness directives and measures mandated by Austro Control

GmbH in immediate reaction to a safety problem.h) A status of modifications and repairs.

i) A status of compliance with the aircraft maintenance programme.

j) A status of service life limited components (including component life limitation,total number of hours/cycles/calendar time and open hours/cycles/calendartime remaining).

k) A mass and balance report which reflects the current status of the managedaircraft.

l) A list of deferred maintenance.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

m) For any component installed, in addition to EASA Form 1 or equivalent,information on

m.1) identification of the component.

m.2) type, S/N and registration to the aircraft to which it has been fitted.

m.3) total flight/calendar time or cycles of the component, as appropriate.

m.4) additional information as listed above, as is applicable to the component.

All entries made in the aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall be clear andaccurate. When it is necessary to correct an entry, the correction shall be made in amanner that clearly shows the original entry.

The maintenance organisation to which maintenance has been contracted shall

retain and make available information on any work performed and any scheduledmaintenance including:

a) Maintenance manuals, SB’s, AD’s, etc.

b) Information on the condition of all life–limited parts, be it flights or calendartime.

c) All work orders and work reports.

The release to service shall be entered as soon as practicable but in no case morethan 30 days after the day of maintenance action.

Despite the maintenance contractor retaining copies of continuing airworthiness

records, the overall responsibility for such documentation remains with…(organisation’s name) CAMO … .




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

…(organisation’s name) CAMO … retains information related to maintenance for thefollowing periods:

document required retention period

Maintenance data provided by theowner or operator

Duration of the contract closed between owneror operator and CAMO

Detailed maintenance records 24 months after the aircraft or component waspermanently withdrawn from service

Total time and flight cycles of the

aircraft and all life-limited parts

12 months after the aircraft has been

withdrawn from service

Time and flight cycles since the lastscheduled maintenance of theaircraft or the aircraft component

Until superseded by another scheduledmaintenance of equivalent work scope anddetail

Bordbuch 36 months after the date of last entry

Current aircraft status ofcompliance with the aircraftmaintenance programme

Until superseded by another inspection ofequivalent work scope and detail

Status of AD’s 12 months after the aircraft has beenwithdrawn from service

Details of modifications and repairsto the A/C or any component vital toflight safety

12 months after the aircraft or component hasbeen withdrawn from service

A copy of each airworthiness reviewcertificate, recommendation issuedand extended, together with all

supporting documents

24 months after the aircraft has beenpermanently withdrawn from service




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

c) Preservation of records17

Keeping continuing airworthiness records in a form acceptable to Austro ControlGmbH means in paper form or on a computer database or a combination of bothmethods. Records stored in microfilm or optical disc form are also acceptable. Allrecords should remain legible throughout the required retention period. Papersystems should use robust material, which can withstand normal handling and filing.Computer systems should have at least one backup system, which should beupdated at least within 24 hours of any entry. Each terminal is required to containprogramme safeguards against the ability of unauthorised personnel to alter thedatabase. Continuing airworthiness records should be stored in a safe way withregard to fire, flood, theft and alteration. Computer backup discs, tapes, etc., shouldbe stored in a different location from that containing the current working discs, tapes,

etc. and in a safe environment. The original of the aircraft records is stored at…(organisation’s name) CAMO … location at the PCA’s office.

Reconstruction of lost or destroyed records can be done by reference to otherrecords which reflect the time in service, research of records maintained by repairfacilities and reference to records maintained by individual mechanics etc. Whenthese things have been done and the record is still incomplete, the owner/operatormay make a statement in the new record describing the loss and establishing thetime in service based on the research and the best estimate of time in service. Thereconstructed records should be submitted to Austro Control GmbH for acceptance.Microfilming or optical storage of continuing airworthiness records may be carried out

at any time. The records should be as legible as the original record and remain so forthe required retention period.

d) Transfer of continuing airworthiness records

Where continuing airworthiness management of an aircraft is transferred to anotherorganisation or person, all retained records shall be transferred to the saidorganisation or person. The time periods prescribed for the retention of records shallcontinue to apply to the said organisation or person. If the continuing airworthinessmanagement of an aircraft is terminated, all retained records will be transferred to theowner or new operator of the aircraft.The PCA is responsible to transfer all continuing airworthiness records to the newowner/operator of the aircraft. The handover of these documents shall bedocumented and signed by both parties.

17Please describe your specific preservation-system.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.4 Accomplishment and control of Airworthiness Directives

a) Airworthiness directive information

The CAMO shall hold and use applicable current maintenance data in theperformance of continuing airworthiness management tasks.The PCA is responsible to check airworthiness directives periodically and to includethem if appropriate into the maintenance planning according AMP. Therefore he/shetakes the airworthiness directives published by the competent authority of the state ofthe type certificate holder of the aircraft/engine/components into account and those ofthe EASA and Austro Control GmbH using the following internet addresses:

EASA: http://ad.easa.europa.eu

ACG:

Example: Aircraft: DA 40 LTA’s from ACG

Engine: Textron Lycoming IO-360 M1A AD’s from FAA

Propeller: MT-Propeller MTV-12-B/180-17 LTA’s from LBA

Additionally: AD’s and LTA’s of aircraft/engine/components issued from EASA andAustro Control GmbH as state of register.

b) Airworthiness directive decision

The PCA analyses the airworthiness directive information and checks if theairworthiness directive is applicable or not. A detailed documentation of allairworthiness directives relevant for the managed aircraft type shall be administratedcontaining the information why the concerned airworthiness directive is applicable ornot. If the airworthiness directive is applicable it is included in the maintenanceplanning and a work order is created in time to implement the airworthiness directiveonto the aircraft. The work order together with the airworthiness directive istransferred to the contracted maintenance organisation for implementation.If an emergency airworthiness directive is applicable, the PCA immediately informsthe owner/operator.

c) Airworthiness directive control

The PCA must ensure that a current status list of all AD’s performed for eachmanaged aircraft is administrated.

The status list must contain the following:

a) Aircraft make/model/serial number

b) Engine make/model/serial number

c) APU make/model

d) Component make/modele) AD/LTA number

f) Subject




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

g) Date and hours/cycles at compliance

h) Method of compliance (SB number, AFM/AOM revision required, not

applicable by S/N, etc.)

i) One time action

j) Recurring action (yes/no)

k) Next compliance due date (date/hours/cycles), if recurrent action is requested

l) Accomplishment information

Airworthiness directives must be performed in the period specified in the AD. Anydeviation must be submitted to EASA for approval. Deviation request shall state thereason for request and shall include supporting data. Based on the EASA Internal

Working Procedure Continuing Airworthiness of Type Design (CAP)

18

determination,an approval may be granted.

The method of compliance and when such compliance was achieved will be recordedin the aircraft airworthiness records (Log Books) by the contracted approvedmaintenance organisation. For AD’s with repetitive inspection content then each andevery inspection will be recorded on completion in the aircraft airworthiness records.A CRS will be issued every time compliance with an AD is established.

The PCA is responsible for control of performing and for request of deviation. He willestablish the applicable work orders.

The PCA is responsible for incorporation and documentation of performed AD’s.

The PCA is responsible to ensure that all applicable AD’s will be performed in time.

18See 4.7.5 of Continuing Airworthiness of Type Design (CAP), Annex II - List of Reportable Events: http://www.easa.eu.int/doc/Certification/Working_Procedures/EASA_CAP_Issue_2_CF_06022006.pdf




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.5 Analysis of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenance

programmeThe PCA will analyse and monitor the effectiveness of the Aircraft maintenanceprogramme through regular Liaison Meetings with the owner/operator, the contractedapproved maintenance organisation and the quality manager.

Liaison Meetings

These meetings will address the following areas:

a) The Aircraft maintenance programme content.

b) The effect on the Aircraft maintenance programme of any ADs, modifications orrepairs.

c) Changes to the operation (e.g. utilisation), which may affect the Aircraftmaintenance programme.

d) Maintenance findings.

e) Other defect reports i.e. air turn-backs, spares reliability, technical delays,technical incidents, repetitive defects and pilot reports.

f) Quality monitoring product samples (aircraft surveys), when performed.

g) Changes to the manufacturer's maintenance guidance material, ServiceBulletins Service Letters etc. and how these affect the Aircraft maintenance

programme.h) Other Quality System findings as they affect upon the contracted approved

maintenance organisations.

Where appropriate and necessary, amendments to the Aircraft maintenanceprogramme will be promulgated by the PCA for submission to Austro Control GmbH asan amendment.

Frequency of Meetings

Liaison meetings will be held as required for every managed aircraft and the results ofany meeting recorded with any actions required allocated to the responsible person.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy

a) General

Non-mandatory modifications will normally take the form of manufacturer's ServiceBulletins, or will be derived from them. Any other changes (i.e. those not covered by amanufacturer's Bulletin) will be initiated by the PCA in consultation with the contractedapproved maintenance organisation or authorised personnel.

b) Service Bulletins

Service Bulletins and all other necessary technical publications are directly received onthe basis of subscriptions from the official dealers.All manufacturer's Service Bulletins applicable to the aircraft managed by…(organisation’s name) CAMO … will be reviewed in the first instance by the PCA forapplicability following LTH 7A. Where compliance with the Service Bulletins' may beseen as beneficial in consideration of the technical, operational and economical effectsto …(organisation’s name) CAMO … a proposal will be made to the owner/operator.The decision on embodiment will be made by the PCA as specified in the contractwith the operator or owner. If the owner/operator decides to implement a SB then theapproved MO will be advised by the PCA. All relevant SB’s will be discussed duringthe Liaison Meetings.

c) Modifications

All modifications may be considered to fall in one of two categories:

• Major modification

• Minor modification

An approval must be requested from EASA for any modification initiated before theactual beginning of the modification embodiment. Installation of any modification isonly approved upon availability of all approved data.

d) Minor Modifications

The PCA or the owner/operator will establish data for the minor modification (in form of

a work report or engineering order). All minor changes have to be agreed by the PCAbefore starting approval process. In case of using an appropriately approved Part 21DO, further approval by EASA is not required.

e) Recording of Modifications

Incorporation of all modifications, whether introduced through Service Bulletins orapproved Minor/Major modifications, is to be recorded in the aircraft airworthinessrecords.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.7 Major modification / repair standards

a) General

A major modification / repair is a type design change not listed in the aircraft, engineor component specification that might appreciably affect the weight and balancelimits, structural strength, performance, engine operation, systems operation, etc.Any major modifications not originated from the TCH are classified as STC’s.

b) Development and approval of major modification and major repairs

All major changes (modification or repairs) to type design have to prepared by anappropriately approved Design Organisation. It is in the responsibility of the DO toinitiate the classification and approval process. Implementation of changes has to beperformed only in accordance with approved data from Part 21 organisations.The PCA has to ensure that approved data’s are available and/or approval has beenobtained, as applicable.

There are two ways of approval:

• Major modification prepared by a DO and approved by EASA (= STC)

• Major repairs prepared by a DO and approved by EASA or prepared andapproved by the DO of the TCH when authorised to do so

As long as approved data (e.g. SRM for repairs) are available no additional design

activities are necessary.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.8 Defect reports

The PCA should ensure that the TCH/STCH, Register NAA and EASA receivesadequate reports of occurrences for that aircraft type, to enable it to issueappropriate service instructions and recommendations to all owners/operators.Liaison with the TCH/STCH is important to establish whether published or proposedservice information will resolve the problem or to obtain a solution to a particularproblem. The PCA in cooperation with the contracted approved MO should assignresponsibility for coordinating action on airworthiness occurrences and for initiatingany necessary further investigation and follow-up activity to a suitably qualifiedperson with clearly defined authority and status.All identified defects occurring on the managed aircraft will result in a defect report(5.1 b)) being forwarded to the PCA and will be subject to review and analysis fortheir effect upon airworthiness and safe operation of the aircraft.In respect of maintenance, reporting a condition that could seriously hazard theaircraft is normally limited to:

1. Serious cracks, permanent deformation, burning or serious corrosion ofstructure found during scheduled maintenance of the aircraft or component.

2. Failure of any emergency system during scheduled testing.

The defect report shall include details such as:

• Date

• Aircraft Registration• Aircraft Type and S/N

• Effected part or component

• Description of discrepancy

• Name of responsible pilot in command

• Signed by the PCA

a) Analysis

Bordbuch pages are examined at regular intervals by …(organisation’s name) CAMO… to provide information concerning defects occurring, Pilot's reports, maintenanceactions and defects of a repetitive nature.

Maintenance input records (work-packs) will also be reviewed for significant findingsby the …(organisation’s name) CAMO … and the contracted approved maintenanceorganisation which may have airworthiness or operational implications.

The PCA will assess the findings as necessary and has to agree any action requiredbefore implementation. Implementation may take the form of an Aircraft maintenanceprogramme amendment or modification action.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities

The PCA is responsible for contacting the aircraft manufacturers and Austro ControlGmbH on all matters concerning the airworthiness of …(organisation’s name) CAMO… managed aircraft. Both Austro Control GmbH and the manufacturer will beadvised of all matters concerning airworthiness within 72 hours after arising of suchevents.

c) Deferred defect policy

…(organisation’s name) CAMO … will seek to ensure by his technical expertise andpractices that the minimum number of open Deferred Defects exist. All openDeferred Defects will be monitored by the PCA in consultation with the approved MOto ensure earliest rectification and subsequent closure.Defects such as cracks and structural defects that are not addressed by approveddata may only be deferred after evaluation according to 21.A.445. Any limitationsshall be processed in accordance with the procedures of 21.A.443.

When a deferred defect is raised the PCA will consult with the certifying staff of anappropriately approved maintenance organisation with a view to arranging theearliest possible rectification action to be taken. A Certificate of Release to Servicewill be issued in the Bordbuch upon clearance of any Deferred Defects.

d) Non Deferrable Defects policy

Non deferrable defects must be repaired before further flight. If defects are notcovered by approved data the TCH has to be involved. Rectification process has tobe performed according the procedures of the approved maintenance organisation.

e) Repetitive Defects

The Bordbuch is monitored by the PCA to identify these defects as and when theyarise. Remedial action will be taken by the approved MO in consultation with thePCA.

f) Mandatory Occurrence Reporting

All incidents and occurrences that fall within the reporting criteria defined in PartM.A.202 (seriously hazards flight safety) has to be reported to state of register,organisation responsible for type design as soon as practicable but in any case within72 hours. For occurrence reporting a form could be created or the accident/incidentform from ACG published on www.austrocontrol.at19 could be used. Part 5 has tocontain such form (5.1 b).

g) Occurrence Review Meetings

All occurrences, which have maintenance implications, will be analysed by the PCAin consultation with the approved MO. Any maintenance occurrence reports raised bythe contracted approved MO on …(organisation’s name) CAMO … managed aircraft

19 www.austrocontrol.at / Luftfahrtagentur / Flugbetrieb und Lizenzierung / Meldeformulare / Accident / IncidentReport




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

will also be advised to the PCA. Both organisations will hold copies of any reportsthat have been raised that affect maintenance.

Liaison meetings will be held between the PCA, the contracted approved MO, theQM and any other involved parties to discuss occurrence reports issues. Thefrequency of these meetings will be held as necessary if required by maintenancefindings and/or operational circumstances.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.9 Engineering activity

All engineering is contracted to suitably approved design organisations. Engineeringorders dealing with minor changes can be prepared by anyone. Matters of designchanges are the responsibility of EASA. For details see part 1.7 in this CAME.

1.10 Reliability programmes

A reliability programme is only required for large aircraft whose AMP is based uponMSG logic or includes condition monitored components or does not contain overhaultime periods for all significant system components20. Whereas the complexity of thereliability programme should be tailored to the amount of the aircraft managed.

The occurrence of significant problems should be recorded and diagnosed fromfollowing sources:

• Safety information promulgated by the applicable Part-21 organisation

• Pilots Reports

• Technical Logs

• Maintenance Worksheets

• Workshop Reports

• Reports on Functional Checks

• Reports on Special Inspections

• Stores Issues/Reports

• Air Safety Reports

• Reports on Technical Delays and Incidents

The reliability data form an important basis for the escalation or deletion of amaintenance task, as well as the de-escalation or addition of a maintenance task.

20Appendix 1 to AMC M.A.302 should be used as a basis for the development of a reliability

programme.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.11 Pre-flight inspections

The pre-flight inspections are performed by the operating crew using the aircraft flightmanual for guidance. The operating crew has to be trained on the performance ofsuch pre-flight inspection.

The pre-flight inspections consist of the following items:

a) Pre-flight inspection according to aircraft flight manual (walk-around)

b) Inspection of the Bordbuch

c) Control of refuelling (quality/quantity)

d) Control of consumable fluids

e) Control of secure baggage loading

f) Control of weight and balance

g) Control of snow, ice, dust and sand contamination

h) Control that all doors are securely fastened

i) Control that all covers and locks are removed

Uplift of oil or hydraulic fluid as well as necessary tire inflation shall be noted on theBordbuch. Any defect appeared during the pre-flight inspections is reported to thePCA using the Bordbuch. The PCA manages the performance of any required

maintenance resulting from the checks above at the contracted approved MO.

1.12 Aircraft weighing

Aircraft weighing is performed by a suitably approved maintenance organisation. ThePCA will review the reports produced by that organisation. The PCA in consultationwith the approved MO will maintain a record of each aircraft managed. Re-weighingwill be carried out at intervals not exceeding 4 years.

Outside the regular required intervals, the aircraft requires to be weighed:

a) After major repairs

b) After major modifications

c) After repainting of an aircraft

d) When the weight or CG can not be determined in an arithmetical way

e) Whenever the cumulative changes to the dry operating mass exceed +/- 0.5%of the maximum landing mass or the cumulative change in CG positionexceeds 0.5% of the mean aerodynamic chord.

The weighing periods are integrated in the AMP and will be controlled by the PCA.Weight reports will be handed out to the PCA by the MO after completing weighingand CG calculation. The PCA will insert the weighing records after checking in theAFM Weight and Balance section of the affected aircraft. The original records will beretained in the technical files of the aircraft. Copies will stay in the AFM and at theMO.

Only the aircraft manufacturer’s published weighing procedures shall be used.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

1.13 Check flight procedures

a) GeneralA technical flight must be performed after special maintenance and/or repair work onaircraft. Only suitable qualified and by the owner/operator accepted pilots shall carryout the flight tests considering Austrian LTH 42.

A technical flight is considered necessary after the following events have taken place:

a) Any time after maintenance has been performed where the manufacturer ofthe aircraft or engine requires a test flight.

b) Any time maintenance has been performed which could change the flightcharacteristics of the aircraft.

c) Any time after replacement of a primary flight control if required.

d) After major repair or modification on the airframe which alters the flightcharacteristics.

e) After change of engine(s).

f) During an Airworthiness Inspection when required by the airworthiness reviewstaff.

b) Procedures and standards

Airworthiness flight testing is not carried out at specific intervals. The test flight must

be authorised by the PCA. All technical flights shall be performed by the minimumflight crew, but inspectors and mechanics, who are directly involved in the precedingwork may be on board. All technical flight procedures are established in accordancewith the applicable AFM. This procedure should also be carried out followingmaintenance, modification or rectification actions affecting the aircraft performance,handling etc. or where required by the manufacturer. All flight tests are carried out tothe flight test schedule generated appropriate to specific need. See also 4.3 d) in thisCAME.Prior to any flight test a CRS, stating the work accomplished has to be issued by theapproved MO in the Bordbuch. After successful performance of the maintenancecheck flight the full release is issued.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 2 Quality system

2.1 Continuing airworthiness quality policy, plan and audits procedure

a) Continuing airworthiness quality policy

This Part 2 of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … CAME defines the continuingairworthiness quality policy, planning and procedures to meet the requirements ofPart-M Subpart G. The Quality System and associated Quality AssuranceProgramme enables monitoring of compliance with Part-M, the ContinuingAirworthiness Management Exposition and any other standards specified by Austro

Control GmbH/EASA, to ensure safe operations and airworthy aircraft.

An organisational review is only permitted if the CAMO fulfils following requirements:

• small CAMO

A small organisation is an organisation with up to 5 full-time staff, including management personnel

• with low complexity

In behalf of number and type of aircraft, number of different fleets, privilege to

perform airworthiness reviews, etc.• which is not managing the continuing airworthiness of aircraft used in

commercial air transport

• issuing ARCs for aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below.

In this case management tasks are not allowed for subcontracting.A detailed procedure should be listed in this chapter in accordance with Appendix XIII to M.A. 712(f).

Quality policy21

The AM has the overall responsibility that the managing of continuing airworthinesswill be ensured on the aircraft listed in 5.4. The PCA and the QM have at all timesdirect access to the AM. …(organisation’s name) CAMO … personnel areencouraged to participate actively in the quality system by reporting all discrepanciesand suggestions for improvements to the QM or AM. The AM has also the overallresponsibility for the quality system including the frequency, format and structure ofthe internal management evaluation activities as prescribed below.

21 Please enter your specific quality policy.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

b) Quality plan22

The quality programme (refer to 5.1 c) will be developed by the quality manager in

liaison with the PCA.Audits are to be carried out at least once a year in order to review all aspects ofcontinuing airworthiness activities within a period of 12 months.

Additional audits are to be carried out:

• whenever corrective action has to be performed before the next scheduledaudit.

• when maintenance procedures are newly established or revised.

• upon exchange of the nominated post holders referred to in part 0.3.

•before subcontracting of airworthiness management activities take place.

c) Quality audit procedure

An audit consists of identifying, in an objective fashion, non-conforming practicesagainst the applicable regulation (EASA Part-M) and the procedures set out in thisCAME. This independent audit is an objective process of routine sample checks of allaspects of the CAMO including some product audits as the end result of the process.

Every audit is subjected to a deviation report. Before distribution, the preliminaryconclusions are presented to the person audited. The auditor and the PCA determinein common the corrective actions to be taken, as well as the time allowed for

implementation. The corrective action should be determined taking into account theroot cause of the finding or concern, so that the corrective action may be designed inorder the non-conformity may not reoccur.The audits shall be documented in audit reports and shall then be recordedaccordingly in the audit plan.

Product audit

The QM has to carry out aircraft and product quality audits at random intervals andwhenever additionally required to new or unusual circumstances.Sample checks will be performed by the QM, he witnesses any relevant maintenancetask and visually inspects the product and the associated documentation. During asample check performed by the QM, repeat disassembly or testing should not beperformed by maintenance staff, unless findings are identified by the QM whichrequiring such action. An aircraft mainly maintained outside of the quality system of a Part-145 or Part M-F organisation (by Part-66 certified staff or by pilot owner, should be subject to product audits in any case.

Delegation of product audits

Under special circumstances, the quality control manager can delegate productaudits to a qualified certifying staff member of a contracted approved MO, providedthese persons have adequate system knowledge, audit training and audit

22Where the organisation has more than one location approved the quality system should describe how these areintegrated into the system and include a plan to audit each location every year.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

experience. This staff of the approved MO should not be involved in the release ofthis specific aircraft.

d) Quality audit remedial action procedure

When objections or defects are determined during an audit, the QM and the PCA areto decide upon corrective actions and/or procedure improvements. The decidedcorrective actions and/or procedure improvements are then to be conveyed to theAM.

The QM monitors the remedial actions and their compliance. The remedial actionsare taken by the concerned person. The QM agrees time for correction with the PCA.He shall check if every corrective action has been applied in due course and shallrecord the corrective actions in his audit reports in the appropriate box. The audit

report shall show by whom the corrective action was carried out and when the QMmade the check. If no corrective or insufficient action has been taken, the QM shallinform the AM accordingly.

Any findings are classified into the following categories:

Level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with Part-Mrequirements which lowers the safety standard andhazards seriously the flight safety.

Level 2 finding is any non-compliance with the Part-M requirements

which could lower the safety standard and possiblyhazard the flight safety or is a non-compliance to theCAME procedures.

Informational

The above mentioned levels of findings require rectifications by the responsiblemanagement personnel within the following time frame:

Level 1 finding immediately

Level 2 finding up to 3 months (depending on nature of finding)

Notification to Austro Control GmbH is required in regards of changes to the

organisation’s activities/approval/location/personnel and whenever an audit findingshows existence of hazard for an aircraft managed (Level 1).

After receipt of notification of findings of an audit of Austro Control GmbH accordingto M.B.705, …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall define a corrective action planand demonstrate corrective action to the satisfaction of ACG within a period agreedwith ACG.

Action will be taken by ACG to suspend in whole or part the approval in case offailure to comply within the timescale granted by ACG.

Quality records shall be preserved for a period of at least 2 years.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

2.2 Monitoring of continuing airworthiness management activities

The Audit Plan includes an assessment of the Continuing Airworthiness Management

activities against the procedures defined in the CAME and in particular the ability ofthe PCA’s ability to discharge their responsibilities effectively with respect to Part-M.

2.3 Monitoring of the effectiveness of the aircraft maintenanceprogramme(s)

The Audit Plan as carried out by the Quality Manager includes a review of theeffectiveness of the Aircraft maintenance programme. This review will criticallyanalyse the findings and actions taken as a result of Para. 1.5 of this CAME.

2.4 Monitoring that all maintenance is carried out by an appropriate

maintenance organisationThe Annual Audit Plan includes verification that the contracted maintenanceorganisation's approval is relevant to the maintenance being performed on theaircraft managed by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … .

Any feed back information requiring amendments to the maintenance contracts foraircraft, engines or components should be reviewed and the contracts amendedaccordingly.

2.5 Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out inaccordance with the contract, including sub-contractors used

by the maintenance contractorThe Audit Programme will include a review of all maintenance provided to…(organisation’s name) CAMO … by the contracted approved MO, including sub-contractors. This review will assess all of the contracted maintenance is carried outin accordance with the Maintenance Contract.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

2.6 Quality audit personnel

The quality management is exclusively subordinate to the AM. The QM worksindependently, should not be one of the nominated post holders and must not bedirectly involved in the activity he/she has been asked to audit. The QM isresponsible for ensuring that the Quality assurance program is properly established,implemented and maintained.

The QM must have:

• direct access to the AM;

• not be one of the nominated post holders; and

• have access to all parts of …(organisation’s name) CAMO …

The QM has the full authority and support from …(organisation’s name) CAMO … toperform her/his duty within the system.The QM may delegate audits to additional auditors and/or an audit team if he/shedeems it necessary. He also establishes the audit and inspection schedule to becompleted during a specific calendar period according the present situation.

Qualification/Training of QM

The nominated QM shall be trained in a manner to fulfil the required knowledge asrequired to perform quality system tasks. The QM must be trained as a minimum:

a) Part-Mb) Quality management

c) Audit technique

d) Technical expertise on the subject audited

Auditors

Auditors must be trained as the same level as the QM.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 3 Contracted Maintenance

This Part 3 of the CAME describes the contracted maintenance arrangements of…(organisation’s name) CAMO … . It includes details of these arrangements,together with the division of responsibility for these arrangements, between…(organisation’s name) CAMO … and the approved MO together with copies of theMaintenance Contracts in force for Base, Line and Engine Off-Wing support, asappropriate.

3.1 Maintenance contractor selection procedure

This activity should be carried out in agreement with the aircraft owner.

Before any contract is signed with a maintenance organisation the PCA will verify

that:

a) The maintenance organisation is appropriately approved and has thenecessary qualified manpower, facilities, tooling, technical documentation etc.This verification to take into account any engine, propeller, or componentmaintenance capability that may be required (though this may be availablethrough sub-contract to other suitably approved MOs.)

b) It will be confirmed that the MO has adequate capacity to undertake theproposed maintenance support.

c) The draft Maintenance Contract will be reviewed and agreed by both parties

with a view to ensuring that each has the ability to discharge theirresponsibilities with respect to Part-M.

3.2 Quality audit of aircraft

The purpose of a quality audit of aircraft is to ensure that all required continuingairworthiness tasks are performed on the aircraft. In no way may a quality audit of anaircraft be confused with a periodic airworthiness review carried out by anappropriately approved organisation or Austro Control GmbH. Quality audit of aircraftare tools to have a feedback on the quality level of the organisation to themanagement staff. Findings of quality audit of aircraft do not affect the airworthinessreview certificate but are submitted to the PCA for closure.

Quality audit of aircraft are performed by the QM or by quality audit personnelaccording to part 2.6 of this exposition.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Performance of quality audit of aircraft

a) A quality audit of aircraft report form must be used to record the outcome andfindings.

b) Quality audits of aircraft are planned in the quality plan (see Part 2.1)regarding flexibility on time scheduling.

c) Contents:

• Inspections if all approved procedures are complied with.

• Inspection if all maintenance was carried out in accordance with theapproved AMP and maintenance contract.

• Inspection if all maintenance was performed according to standard

practices.

• Inspection if the requirements of Part-M are complied with.

d) All findings of the audit are recorded with a time limit on which the finding has tobe closed.

e) The report is submitted to the PCA for further management.

The quality audit of aircraft is performed by the QM with the assistance of a personhaving an appropriate maintenance licence for the aircraft type.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 4 Airworthiness Review Procedures

This section describes the working procedure for the airworthiness review accordingEASA Part M, Subpart G M.A.710 and Subpart I. The purpose of the airworthinessreview is the verification of the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft. The approvalfor this privilege is granted by the competent authority (ACG). Airworthiness reviewtasks can not be sub-contracted. To ensure validity of the aircraft airworthinesscertificate an airworthiness review of an aircraft and its continuing airworthinessrecords have to be carried out periodically.

Following aspects are applicable for CAMOs holding AR-privileges according to M.A.711(b ):

For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO carries out complete reviews (record review andphysical survey) and issues ARCs if the reviewed aircraft is permanently in acontrolled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO approval.Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) it has issued twicefor a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy andremained under controlled environment.

For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft listed on scope with review privileges, but remained outside controlled environment under the CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO is approved to carry out complete reviews (recordreview and physical survey) and issue recommendations for aircraft which are notpermanently in a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name CAMO)but when listed with review privileges in the ...(organisation’s name) CAMO scope....(organisation’s name) CAMO shall send the recommendation together with theapplication from the owner/operator to the competent authority. This recommendationshould at least be in English when the member state of registry is not Austria. Aftersatisfactory evaluation of the recommendation the competent authority issues theARC.

For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the CAMO …(Organisation's name) CAMO carries out complete reviews (record review andphysical survey) and issues ARCs if the reviewed aircraft is permanently in acontrolled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO approval.Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) it has issued twicefor a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy andremained under controlled environment.

For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - Aircraft listed on scope with review privileges, but remained outside controlled environment under the

…(organisation´s name) CAMO ...(organisation’s name) CAMO is approved to carry out complete reviews (recordreview and physical survey) and issue ARCs for aircraft which are not permanently in




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

a controlled environment under the …(organisation's name) CAMO but when listedwith review privileges in the ...(organisation’s name) CAMO scope.

The competent staff who is/are responsible for the issuance of extensions is/arenamed in chapter 5.2.

Whenever circumstances show the existence of a potential safety threat, thecompetent authority shall carry out the airworthiness review itself hand issue theairworthiness review certificate itself. In this case, the owner or operator shall providethe competent authority with:

— the documentation required by the competent authority,

— suitable accommodation at the appropriate location for its personnel, and

when necessary the support of personnel appropriately qualified in accordance withPart-66.

Airworthiness review tasks shall not be sub-contracted.

CAMOs which does not hold AR-privileges:

...(organisation’s name) CAMO does not hold the privilege to carry out airworthinessbreviews.

For aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below - managed by …(Organisation's name)

CAMO (organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint appropriately approvedCAMO(s) and/or ACG to carry out airworthiness reviews periodically for the managedaircraft below 2.730 kg MTOM. After satisfactory review the appointed CAMO or thecompetent authority will issue the ARC(s) and deliver it to (organisation's name)CAMO. If findings have come up during the review, the PCA is responsible toperform corrective actions within the given due date and to store a copy of the ARCtogether with the aircraft records....(organisation’s name) CAMO extends the ARC(s) twice for a period of one yearafter it has justified that the aircraft was/were airworthy and remained under itscontrolled environment.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft remained within controlled environment under the …(organisation´s name) CAMO

…(organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint approved CAMO(s) tocarry out airworthiness reviews periodically for the managed aircraft above 2.730 kgMTOM. The appropriately approved CAMO will issue recommendations and sendthem to the competent authority. After satisfactory evaluation of the recommendationthe competent authority will issue the ARC(s) and deliver it to (organisation's name)CAMO.If findings have come up during the review, the PCA is responsible to performcorrective actions within the given due date and to store a copy of the ARC togetherwith the aircraft records. Furthermore ...(organisation’s name) CAMO extends theARC(s) for a period of one year after it has justified that the aircraft was/wereairworthy and remained under controlled environment.

For aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM - Aircraft managed by …(organisation´s name) CAMO but does not fulfil the controlled environment under the CAMO …(organisation's name) CAMO takes responsibility to appoint approved CAMO(s) tocarry out airworthiness reviews periodically. The appropriately approved CAMO willissue recommendations and send them to the competent authority. After satisfactoryevaluation of the recommendation the competent authority will issue the ARC(s) anddeliver it to the approved CAMO. If findings have come up during the review, thePCA is responsible to perform corrective actions within the given due date and tostore a copy of the ARC together with the aircraft records.

Following persons are authorised by … (Organisation´s name)… to extend an ARC23:

Max MaierMichi MaierMartin Maier

4.1 Airworthiness review staff

4.1.1 Experience, qualification, training and procedure

To carry out airworthiness reviews, …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall have

appropriate airworthiness review staff to issue M.A. Subpart I airworthiness reviewcertificates or recommendations.

These staff shall have acquired24:

a) For Aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM, except Balloons

1. at least five years experience in continuing airworthiness25, and;

23These persons don´t need to be authorised as Airworthiness Review Staff and therefore don´t need an EASA

Form 4 for acceptance by ACG. They will be accepted through the approval of the CAME.24For detailed information: ARS Zugangsvoraussetzungen.doc

25“experience in continuing airworthiness” means any appropriate combination of experience in tasksrelated to aircraft maintenance and/or continuing airworthiness management (engineering) and/orsurveillance of such tasks.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

2. an appropriate Part-66 licence26 or a nationally recognized maintenancepersonnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category or an aeronautical

degree or equivalent, and;3. formal aeronautical maintenance training, and;

4. a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities27

5. Point 2 may be replaced by five years of experience in continuing

airworthiness additional to the five years mentioned in point 1.

b) For Aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below and Balloons

1. at least three years experience in continuing airworthiness, and;

2. an appropriate Part-66 licence or a nationally recognized maintenancepersonnel qualification appropriate to the aircraft category or an aeronauticaldegree or equivalent, and;

3. appropriate aeronautical maintenance training, and;

4. a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities;

5. Point 2 may be replaced by four years of experience in continuingairworthiness additional to the three years mentioned in point 1.

Following staff could be approved as review staff if it fulfils the above mentioned

requirement: • PCA: When he/she was not involved in the release to service of that

aircraft he/she makes reviews

• QM: When he/she does not perform product audit(s) on that aircraft he/she makes reviews

• CAMO-personnel: When it is responsible for the complete continuing airworthiness management process of the particular aircraft

• AM

• The person of an one-man organisation

.

Airworthiness review staff nominated by the …(organisation’s name) CAMO … mayonly be issued an authorisation by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … when formallyaccepted by Austro Control GmbH after satisfactory completion of an airworthinessreview under supervision (assessment). Applications for the nomination ofairworthiness review staff shall be submitted through a filled in EASA Form 4 andEASA Form 2 to Austro Control GmbH.

26 An appropriate Part-66 licence is a category B or C licence in the sub-category of the aircraft reviewed. It is notnecessary to satisfy the experience requirements of Part-66 at the time of the review.

27To hold a position with appropriate responsibilities means the airworthiness review staff should have a positionin the organisation independent from the airworthiness management process or with overall authority on theairworthiness management process of complete aircraft.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Formal Aeronautical Maintenance Training

a) Review staff for Aircraft above 2.730 kg MTOM, except Balloons

This means training (internal or external) supported by evidence on the followingsubjects:

• Relevant parts of initial and continuing airworthiness regulations.

• Relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures, if applicable.

• The organisation’s continuing airworthiness management exposition.

• Knowledge of a relevant sample of the type(s) of aircraft gained through aformalised training course. These courses should be at least at a level

equivalent to Part-66 Level 1 General Familiarisation and could be impartedby a Part-147 organisation, by the manufacturer, or by any otherorganisation accepted by the competent authority.

“Relevant sample” means that these courses should cover typical systems embodiedin those aircraft being within the scope of approval.

• Maintenance methods.

b) For Aircraft of 2.730 kg MTOM and below and Balloons

“Experience in continuing airworthiness” can be full-time or part-time, either asprofessional or on a voluntary basis.

Appropriate aeronautical maintenance training means demonstrated knowledge ofthe following subjects:

• Relevant parts of initial and continuing airworthiness regulations.

• Relevant parts of operational requirements and procedures, if applicable.

• The organisation’s continuing airworthiness management exposition.

• Knowledge of a relevant sample of the type(s) of aircraft gained throughtraining and/or work experience.

• Maintenance methods.

This knowledge may be demonstrated by documented evidence.

4.1.2 Authorisations

Every airworthiness review staff of …(organisation’s name) CAMO … holds anairworthiness review authorisation (permit) that states the individual scope of work(aircraft types). An example of the review staff authorisation is published in chapter5.2.1.

The QM or the AM with consultation with the PCA is responsible for the issuance,restriction and prohibition of the permit.

The permit will be issued after assessment to following personal data:




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

a) Personal licensing.

b) Certificates of successfully completed trainings.

c) Experience and practice

A restriction takes place in case of a restriction of the organisation-authorisation orwhen the verification of practice for certain authorisations is insufficient. In addition incase of traceable frequently mistakes within the scope of the permit.

In case of gross negligence, fatal professional or disciplinary mistakes…(organisation’s name) CAMO … will prohibit the permit.

A validity status list is kept in the personal files. A permit is valid for 2 years. When anextension is necessary a new permit will be issued and signed by the AM, PCA andthe holder after assessment.

The …(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall ensure that aircraft airworthiness reviewstaff can demonstrate appropriate recent continuing airworthiness managementexperience. This could be achieved through continuing airworthiness managementactivities for at least six months in every two year period, or through at least oneairworthiness review conducted in the last twelve month period.

If the staff can not meet the above mentioned experience, the permit becomesinvalid. In order to restore the validity of the authorisation, the airworthiness reviewstaff shall conduct at a satisfactory level an airworthiness review under thesupervision of the competent authority.

A list of airworthiness review staff having recent continuing airworthinessmanagement experience to perform airworthiness reviews is published in chapter 5.2of this CAME.

4.1.3 Records

…(organisation’s name) CAMO … shall maintain a record of all airworthiness reviewstaff in each personal file.

The minimum content of the records is listed below:

• Personal data

• Basic Education,

• Experience,

• Aeronautical Degree and/or Part-66 qualification and/or nationally-recognisedmaintenance personnel qualification,

• Initial Training received,

• Type of Training received,

•

Continuation Training received,• Experience in continuing airworthiness and within the organisation,

• Responsibilities of current role in the organisation,




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

• Copy of the authorisation.

This record shall be retained until two years after the airworthiness review staff haveleft the organisation.

Personal details are kept in the respective personal file.

4.2 Review of aircraft records

To satisfy the requirement for an airworthiness review of aircraft, a full documentedreview of the aircraft records are carried out by …(organisation’s name) CAMO … inorder to be satisfied that:

1. airframe, engine and propeller flying hours and associated flight cycles havebeen properly recorded, and;

2. the flight manual is applicable to the aircraft configuration and reflects thelatest revision status, and;

3. all the maintenance due on the aircraft according to the approved aircraftmaintenance programme has been carried out, and;

4. all known defects have been corrected or, when applicable, carried forward ina controlled manner, and;

5. all applicable airworthiness directives have been applied and properlyregistered, and;

6. all modifications and repairs applied to the aircraft have been registered andare approved according to Part 21, and;

7. all service life limited components installed on the aircraft are properlyidentified, registered and have not exceeded their approved service life limit,and;

8. all maintenance has been released in accordance with this Part, and;

9. the current mass and balance statement reflects the configuration of theaircraft and is valid, and;

10. the aircraft complies with the latest revision of its type design approved by the

Agency.As a minimum, sample checks within each document category should be carried out.A checklist (5.1 (f)) will be used to confirm that the above has been reviewed andfound in compliance with Part-M.

4.3 Physical survey

…(organisation’s name) CAMO … airworthiness review staff shall carry out aphysical survey of the aircraft. For this review, airworthiness review staff notappropriately qualified to Part-66 shall be assisted by such qualified personnel who isapproved to issue a release to service if required. Nevertheless the review staff who

is signing the ARC shall carry out both the document review and the physical survey.The physical survey may be performed up to 90 days before the new expiration dateof the ARC that the review can take place during a maintenance check. The review ofaircraft records and the physical survey will be carried out within one survey.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Through the physical survey of the aircraft, the airworthiness review staff shall ensurethat:

1. all required markings and placards are properly installed, and;

2. the aircraft complies with its approved flight manual, and;

3. the aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation, and;

4. no evident defect can be found that has not been addressed according toM.A.403, and;

5. no inconsistencies can be found between the aircraft and the documentedreview of records.

4.3.1 Physical survey on the aircraft28

In addition to the tasks required above the following checks have to be performedanyway:

a) Inspection of the general condition of the aircraft

This should include a detailed outside check according AFM. In particularpaying attention to:

1. leakages at areas of the engine(s), tank(s), landing gear

2. proper condition of the tyres

3. condition of the brakes (unallowable deformation and coloration of brakediscs respectively thickness of brake linings)

4. structure damages (hard landings, strokes of lightning, other indications ofoverload)

5. condition and function of aircraft systems (e.g. stall warning, pitot/staticheater and de-icing systems)

Inside the aircraft:

6. equipment (refer to b))

7. fixation and condition of seats

8. condition of instrument panels, windshields, windows

9. condition and free moving of flight controls (including throttle control,mixture control, propeller control,…), doors

10. critical areas that are typically vulnerable for corrosion depending on theaircraft type

b) Inspection of the equipment

11. safety equipment

12. operational equipment

28The physical survey could require actions categorised as maintenance (e.g. operational tests, tests ofemergency equipment, visual inspections requiring panel opening etc.). In this case, after the airworthinessreview a release to service should be issued in accordance with Part-M.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

13. minimum equipment according to ZLLV, Appendix D and LTH 44

14. Additional equipment must be inspected if aircraft is used for towing

(gliders, banners) or drop off of skydivers.

c) Engine runs

An engine run has to be performed on the occasion of every aircraft review.

Only instructed and authorised staff shall perform engine runs and only inareas which are suitable therefore. The information of wind direction andvelocity has to be included into the consideration how to line up the aircraft forengine run. Devices for towing the aircraft have to be removed during the runup. Suitable and sufficient fire extinguishers and personal instructed with thehandling of them shall be ready within a distance of max. 40 meters. All

preparations for an engine run have to be performed according the operatinghandbook.

d) Check flights

The surveyor has the authorisation to dispose a check flight when he/shedeems necessary.

Following points must be complied with:

15. A reason for the check flight must be recorded before performing the checkflight. This record is a part of the physical review checklist.

16. The operator/owner of the aircraft must agree with the designated pilot.

17. The pilot in command shall have a valid licence for the aircraft andadequate experience (Austrian LTH 42).

18. The surveyor shall not be the PIC.

19. The purpose for the flight and the flight program has to be discussedbetween the surveyor and the pilot before start of the check flight. Anappropriate briefing has to be performed. Depending on the flight programit could be necessary that the PIC needs a valid licence for aerobatics.

20. There must not be a finding or restriction which is being opposed to the

flight. Safety first!

21. The review time limit must not be expired and there must not be a reasonthat the review will fail.

22. Only a negligible deviation from the assigned flight program is allowed.

23. The result of the check flight shall be documented as part of the physicalreview checklist.

A checklist (5.1 (g)) will be used to confirm that the above has been reviewed andfound in compliance with Part-M.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

4.4 Additional procedures for recommendations to competent

authorities for the import of aircraft

a) Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU

When transferring an aircraft registration within the EU, the former Member State willbe informed that the aircraft will be registered onto the new register of a MemberState.

An application will be made to the competent authority for registration for theissuance of a new airworthiness certificate.

The former airworthiness review certificate remains valid until its expiry date.

The proper transfer of information will be ensured between the two competentauthorities during the aircraft transfer process.

The PCA will verify that:

1. the competent authority for registration entered the new aircraft registration onthe existing airworthiness review certificate and validated the change and,

2. the data package to be provided to ACG according LTH tbd. is collected andassembled and,

3. that the compliance checklists for the applicable operational equipmentrequirement (EU OPS 1, JAR OPS 3, JAR 26, LTH 44, LTH 47) are produced

and submitted to ACG.

b) Airworthiness review of used aircraft imported into the EU

In case of import of an used aircraft from a third country (Non EU member State) theholder shall apply to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a newairworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21. In this context an airworthinessreview has to be carried out by the CAMO.

Ensure that:

1. an application to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a newairworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21 is filed; and

2. an airworthiness review carried out by an appropriately approvedcontinuing airworthiness management organisation and all files areavailable; and

3. all maintenance as requested by approved data of TCH was carried out by

the approved maintenance organisation.∗

In order to allow for possible participation of authority personnel, the applicant shouldinform the competent authority at least 10 working days in advance of the time andlocation of the airworthiness review.

If …(organisation’s name) CAMO … is not approved for the specific aircraft typeavailable, the competent authority may carry out the airworthiness review. In this

∗ Items not applicable for new aircraft with a valid Export CoA or Statement of Conformity (Part 21 Form 52)




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

case, the airworthiness review should be requested to the competent authority with a30-day notice.

The aircraft and all relevant records will be reviewed to determine the work to beundertaken to establish the airworthiness of the aircraft.

Additional items which have to be reviewed are as follows:

• Certificates (e.g. Radio Station License, Insurance Certificate, CoA for Export,primary authority information)

• Aircraft Maintenance Status (e.g. certified current Time in Service, Times andCycles since last maintenance, certified Status of Airworthiness Directivesincluding method of compliance, certified inventory of Hard Time Components,Aircraft Accident & Incident Reports)

• Maintenance Records (e.g. Technical Logs (min. 2 years), Aircraft-, Engine-,APU log books, non-SRM structural repairs and approvals)

• Engine Records (e.g. Airworthiness Directives Status, Service Bulletin Status,certified statement that the engines are not involved in an accident)

• APU Records (e.g. Statement of APU Hours and Cycles, LLP status and fulltraceability to birth)

• Component Records (e.g. component AD and SB status, AD compliance reportand compliance documentation for appliances, parts needing European parts

approval)• Landing Gear Records (e.g. approved LLP listings for each gear)

• Manuals (e.g. Airplane Flight Manual, Airplane Operating Manual, Emergency / Abnormal Checklist, Quick Reference Handbook)

• Miscellaneous (e.g. maintenance program specifications (previous operator),operator’s approved maintenance program, approved minimum equipment list)

• Emergency Equipment (e.g. cockpit configuration, cabin layout, instrumentlimitations, placards)

Maintenance to be carried out is as follows:• maintenance needed for import, such as embodiment of modifications needed

to comply with the EASA type certificate, bridging check to comply with the newaircraft maintenance programme

• avionics such as radio and navigation equipment, instrument flight rules (IFR)equipment, digital flight data recorder (DFDR) / cockpit voice recorder (CVR)test, ELT 406 MHz code and identification

• compass compensation

• special operating rules such as extended twin-engine operations (ETOPS) /

long range operations (LROPS), reduced vertical separation minima (RVSM),MNPS, all weather operations (AWOPS), RNAV




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

• aircraft survey including verification of conformity with the flight manual and thedatasheet, presence of fire proof identification plates, conformity of markings

including registration, presence and serviceability of emergency equipment,internal and external lighting systems

• Painting of new registration marks and flag

• Installation stainless steel registration placard with new registration

• Installation of language placards, where required

• check flight including check of control system / cockpit ground check / enginerun up

• Special national requirements

When satisfied that the aircraft is in compliance with the relevant requirements, thecontinuing airworthiness management organisation shall send a documentedrecommendation for the issuance of an airworthiness review certificate to theMember State of registry.

The owner represented by the PCA shall allow access to the aircraft for inspection bythe Member State of registry.

A new airworthiness certificate will be issued by the Member State of registry when itis satisfied the aircraft complies with the prescriptions of Part 21.

The Member State shall also issue the airworthiness review certificate valid normally

for one year unless the Member State has safety reason to limit the validity.The PCA has to support this decision with requested documents.

The recommendation sent to the competent authority should contain at least theitems described below:29

a) All the information set forth by 4.5 a) to g) in this CAME

b) Aircraft information

- aircraft assigned registration

- state of manufacturer

- previous registration∗

- export certificate number

- TC and TC data sheet numbers

- noise and emissions TC and TC data sheet numbers (if available)

- comparison of prior aircraft maintenance programme with the proposed

new aircraft maintenance programme (transfer check).∗

c) Documents accompanying the recommendation

- copy of the application, and;

29For details see: www.austrocontrol / Luftfahrtagentur / Luftfahrzeuge / Lufttüchtigkeit & Zertifizierung / LTZ





DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

- original export certificate, and;

- copy of the approvals of the flight manual and its supplements, and;

- list of AD’s incorporated up to the latest published issue, and;

- proposed new aircraft maintenance programme, and;

- status of all service life limited components, and;

- the valid weight and centre of gravity schedule reflecting the currentconfiguration of the aircraft, and;

- Part 21 approval reference for all modifications and repairs.

d) Maintenance∗

- a copy of the work packages requested by the subpart G organisationincluding details of any bridging check to ensure all the necessarymaintenance has been carried out.

e) Aircraft check flight

- a copy of the check flight report

c) New aircraft from EU or imported from a third country

In case of import of new aircraft from EU or a third country (Non EU member state)the holder shall apply to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a newairworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21.

The PCA shall communicate with the Member State of registry and shall ensure that:

1. an application to the Member State of registry for the issuance of a newairworthiness certificate in accordance with Part 21 is filed and,

2. the data package to be provided to ACG according LTH tbd. is collected,assembled and provided and,

3. compliance checklists for the applicable operational equipment requirement(EU OPS 1, JAR OPS 3, JAR 26, LTH 44, LTH 47) are produced andsubmitted to ACG.

For new aircraft originating from an EU member state the PCA shall ensure that astatement of conformity according Part 21 is issued by the manufacturer. Theconformity with the Austrian additional national requirements and the existence of therequired data package has to be ensured by the PCA.

For new aircraft imported from a third country the conformity of the aircraft has to bedocumented by an export CoA stating conformity to an EASA approved type design.Where applicable the compliance inspection may be performed under the procedureagreed between ACG and the exporting authority (ODAR-procedure). In this case theconformity with the Austrian additional national requirements and the existence of therequired data package is ensured by the ODAR. If no procedure is available the PCAhas to ensure the conformity.





DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

4.5 Recommendations to competent authorities for the issuance of

airworthiness review certificatesAn M.A.902 airworthiness review certificate (EASA Form 15b) or a recommendationform (5.1 h)) is issued by appropriately authorised M.A.707 airworthiness review staffon behalf of …(organisation’s name) CAMO CAMO when satisfied that theairworthiness review has been properly carried out.

A copy of both physical review and document review check lists stated above shouldbe sent to the competent authority together with any recommendation issued. Thisshould also include a finding statement with the rectification of findings if necessary.

The recommendation sent to the competent authority should contain at least theitems described below:

a) General information

- CAMO name and address

- owner name

- date and place the document review and the aircraft survey were carried out

- period and place the aircraft can be seen if required by the competentauthority

b) Aircraft information

- registration

- type

- manufacturer

- serial number

- flight manual reference

- weight and centre of gravity data

- aircraft maintenance programme reference

c) Documents accompanying the recommendation

- copy of registration papers

- The owners request for a new airworthiness review certificate

d) Aircraft status

- aircraft total time and cycles

- list of persons or organisations having carried out continuing airworthinessactivities including maintenance tasks on the aircraft and its componentssince the last airworthiness review certificate




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

e) Aircraft survey

- copy of the filled out Physical review checklist (chapter 5.1 (g)).

f) Findings

- a list of all the findings made during the airworthiness review with thecorrective action carried out

g) Statement

- A statement signed by the airworthiness review staff recommending theissue of an airworthiness review certificate.

The statement should confirm that the aircraft in its current configuration complieswith the following:

- airworthiness directives up to the latest published issue, and;

- type certificate datasheet, and;

- aircraft maintenance programme, and;

- component service life limitations, and;

- the valid weight and centre of gravity schedule reflecting the currentconfiguration of the aircraft, and;

- Part 21 for all modifications and repairs, and;

- the current flight manual including supplements, and;

- operational requirements.

The above items should clearly state the exact reference of the data used inestablishing compliance; for instance the number and issue of the type certificatedata sheet used should be stated.

The statement should also confirm that all of the above is properly entered andcertified in the aircraft continuing airworthiness record system and/or in theowner/operator’s Bordbuch.

4.5.1 Findings

A level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with EASA Part-M requirementswhich lowers the safety standard and hazards seriously the flight safety. In this case,no airworthiness review certificate will be issued until the finding is closed.

A level 2 finding is any non-compliance with EASA Part-M requirements which couldlower the safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety. In this case, a duedate will be defined (max. 3 months) for the finding.

The finding list is included in the Compliance Checklist for aircraft review (chapter 5.1(f)). This finding list will be signed by the airworthiness review staff and PCA. ThePCA defines a corrective action plan and demonstrates corrective actions to thesatisfaction of the airworthiness review staff within a period agreed including

appropriate corrective actions to prevent reoccurrence of the finding and its rootcause. The airworthiness review staff is responsible for the control of the due dates.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

4.6 Issuance of airworthiness review certificates

After successful completion of an airworthiness review, the appropriately authorisedairworthiness review staff issues the ARC by using the EASA Form 15b. The ARChas to be numbered with ascending and unique digits. All entries made shall be clearand accurate. When it is necessary to correct an entry, the correction shall be madein a manner that clearly shows the original entry. In this case the correction should besigned and dated by the surveyor. The ARC is valid for one year.

If findings have come up during the review, the review staff will classify the findinglevels and hand over the airworthiness review finding list together with the ARC tothe PCA or to the QM. The classification of findinglevels should be the same asthose listed in chapter 2.1 of this CAME. PCA is responsible to perform corrective

actions within the given due date and to store the ARC together with the aircraftrecords.

The complete review may be performed up to 90 days before the new expiration dateof the ARC without loss of continuity of the airworthiness review pattern in order tohave a flexible time period for the physical survey. In this case the reviewed aircraft isstill considered as being within controlled environment under ...(organisation’s name)CAMO.

Should the outcome of the airworthiness review be inconclusive, the competentauthority shall be informed.

An ARC will be extended twice for a period of one year each time if the aircraft iswithin a controlled environment30 and it is verified that:

1. the ARC is valid

2. the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft or any component fitted to theaircraft does meet the requirements of Part-M, and;

3. the aircraft does remain in conformity with the type design approved by theAgency; and

4. the aircraft has been operated within the limitations of the approved flightmanual or the airworthiness certificate, and;

5. the aircraft has not been involved in an accident or incident that affects theairworthiness of the aircraft, without subsequent appropriate action to restoreairworthiness; and

6. a modification or repair has been approved in accordance with Part 21.

The above mentioned requirements shall be documented. Therefore the complianceis stated on the Extension Form and on the EASA Form 15b.

The original ARC will be held in the respective aircraft documents. A copy of anyairworthiness review certificate issued or extended for an aircraft shall be sent to the

30 An aircraft in a controlled environment is an aircraft continuously managed by an M.A. Subpart G approvedcontinuing airworthiness management organisation, which has not changed organisations in the previous 12months, and which is maintained by approved maintenance organisations. This includes M.A.803(b)maintenance carried out and released to service according to M.A.801(b)2 or M.A.801(b)3.




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Member State of Registry of that aircraft within 10 days. …(organisation’s name)CAMO CAMO will also retain one copy of each ARC issued (refer to 4.7 in this

CAME).

4.6.1 Invalidity of the airworthiness review certificate

An airworthiness review certificate becomes invalid if:

1. suspended or revoked; or

2. the airworthiness certificate is suspended or revoked; or

3. the aircraft is not on the aircraft register of a Member State; or

4. the type certificate under which the airworthiness certificate was issued issuspended or revoked.

An aircraft must not fly if the airworthiness certificate is invalid or if the above points1. to 5. are not verified.

Upon surrender or revocation, the airworthiness review certificate shall be returned tothe competent authority.

An airworthiness review certificate shall not be extended if the organisation is awareor has reason to believe that the aircraft is unairworthy.

4.7 Airworthiness review records, responsibilities, retention andaccess

The PCA is responsible that the airworthiness review records are kept in a formacceptable to Austro Control GmbH. Retention takes place according to part 1.3 c)and d) in this CAME.

…(organisation’s name) CAMO issues an airworthiness review certificate, or makes arecommendation for the airworthiness review to a Member State of Registry.

…(organisation’s name) CAMO retains a copy of each airworthiness reviewcertificate and recommendation issued, together with all supporting documents.

…(organisation’s name) CAMO retains a copy of all those records until two yearsafter the aircraft has been permanently withdrawn from service (refer to table ofretention periods in 1.3 in this CAME).




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

Part 5 Appendices

5.1 Sample documents

a) Bordbuch

b) Accident / Incident Report

c) Quality plan

d) Extension form

e) CAME Recognition Certificate




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

f) Document review checklist (example)

Document Checklist ARC

Aircraft data: Airworthiness Review Reference Number:

Date of Review:Performed by: Sign:

No. Description Comply Remarks

Yes No

1 REVIEW

A01

Airframe, Engine, APU and Propeller hours/cycleshave been properly recorded Pls Record the following information:

*

Airframe:

S/N:TAH: TAC:Manufacturing date:Last inspection:

**

Engine Daten (Model __________):

S/N: Pos: LHTSN: CSN:Hobbs/Tachtime:Last OH:Manufacturing date:Installed:Time at installation: hrs / cyc

**

Engine Daten (Model __________):

S/N: Pos: RHTSN: CSN:

Hobbs/Tachtime:Last OH:Manufacturing date:Installed:Time at installation: hrs / cyc

**

APU Daten (Model __________)

S/N: P/N:TSN: CSN:Last OH:Manufacturing date:Installed:Time at installation: hrs / cyc

EASA Form One:

**




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Yes NoPropeller Daten (Model __________)

S/N: Pos:P/N:TSN: CSN:Last OH:Manufacturing date:Installed:Time at installation: hrsEASA Form One:

**

Propeller Daten (Model __________)

S/N: Pos:P/N:TSN: CSN:Last OH:Manufacturing date:Installed:Time at installation: hrsEASA Form One:

**

A02

AFM/Pilots Operating Manual/Owners Manual:Verify applicability and revision status.Doc. No.:

Revision:

Supplements:-

A03

Maintenance acc OMP has been carried out:Review of Aircraft/Engine/ Propeller/APU log books .Verify all maintenance due acc OMP has been performedand released i.a.w. Part M.Record all discrepancies and copy actual status.

*

A04

All defects rectified or deferred:Verify all known defects has been corrected or whenapplicable deferred in a controlled manner. Verify openitems conform to MEL or CDL. Verify all open items areknown to CAMO and listed.

*

A05

AD Status:ADs issued by EASA and the State of Design or thoseeffective under “grandfather” provisions. Verify allapplicable ADs has been applied and properly registered.Record all discrepancies and copy actual status.

*

A06

Modifications:

All modifications applied to the Aircraft have beenregistered including approval status acc Part 21.( look for STC´s, Mod´s Eo´s, etc..)

*




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Yes No

A06

SB Status:Verify all mandatory SB´s acc to CAMO SB Procedurehas been applied and registered. *

A06

Repair and Damage Records:Repairs previously embodied by Owner(s)/Operator(s),including approval status acc. Part 21 and recordscontaining unrepaired damages.

*

A07

List of Service life limited Components:Verify that all Service life limited Components installed on

the aircraft are properly identified, registered and havenot exceeded their approved service life limit.

*

A08

All Maintenance has been released acc PART 145:Check a relevant sample of Techlog pages,Workpackages and checks.

*

A09

Aircraft Weighing Report:Individual aircraft weighing record is current and reflectactual configuration.Reference:

**

A10

Airframe, Engine and Propeller TCDS:Verfiy that the aircraft complies with the latest revision ofthe Type design (described in TCDS) approved by theagency.

**

2 REVIEW CONCLUSION

3.2

Open Item List (Beanstandungsliste):Issuance of the open item list.Allocation of time limits and/or due dates.Hand-over to the representative of the operator.To be signed by an authorized person of the operator.

***




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

g) Physical review checklist

Physical review checklist ARC (example)

Aircraft data: Airworthiness Review Reference Number:

Aircraft Eng1 Eng2 APUType:ManufacturerSerial Nr.:Total hoursTotal cycles

Date of Review:Performed by: Sign:


Yes No

1 PREPARATION1A Prepare the following documents:

List of required PlacardsDocument statusLOPAEquipment ListList of ModificationsDent and Buckle ChartEU OPS 1 and JAR 26 ChecklistsList of Approved Kinds of OperationOps Checks to be performedFlight test Program if necessary

**

2 REVIEW2A List of Placards and Markings:

In accordance with TCDS, AMM chapter 11, AFM, OPS 1and/or national regulations.

**

AFM/Pilots Operating Manual/Owners Manual:Verify that the aircraft complies with the approved AFM.Verify Type and Config is applicable.Check for Options and Modifications.

**

2C Verify that the Airplane Configuration complies withthe approved documentation:Check the items below

*

Cabin Configuration Control:Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with the

approved documentation.

*




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Yes NoEngine/APU/Propeller:Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with theapproved documentation.

**

Approved Modifications:Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with theapproved documentation.

**

Other Manuals required for operation:(e.g. AOM, QRH, FMS, CDL, …)Verify that the aircraft configuration complies with theapproved documentation

**

2D Evident defects: Verify that no evident defects can be found that have notbeen addressed.

**

2E Verify that no inconsistencies exist between theaircraft and the documentation as reviewed duringthe document review:Check the items below

*

Repair and Damage Records:Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraftand the documentation

**

Equipment List:Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraftand the documentation.

*

Modification Status Report:Verify that no inconsistencies exist between the aircraftand the documentation.

**

2F EU OPS 1 / JAR 26 Compliance Report:Operator declaration of compliance with subpart K & L.Deviations have to be notified (refer to 4B) to the ACGdepartment Flight Operations (OPS), unless alreadyapproved.

**

2G Operational Checks to ensure compliance:List items:

***

2H List of Areas inspected visually:List areas here or refer to additl Checklist

***

2I Registration marks incl. fire-proof plate:According to ZLLV.

3 Verification during Flight3A Check flight found necessary: ***




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Yes No3B Check Flight program: ***

4 Conclusion4A EU OPS Findings Report

Forward to ACG Dept. AOT OPS .

4B Open Item List (Beanstandungsliste):Issuance of the open item list.

Allocation of time limits and/or due dates.Hand-over to the representative of the operator.To be signed by an authorized person of the operator.

***




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

h) Recommendation form for issuance of airworthiness review

certificates

i) Annual Review Checklist OMP –Small AC

Aircraft Type/Fleet: OMP – Reviewed:

Org./Owner:


Yes No

1 PREPARATION1.1 Fleet and Registrations:

Last review performed:

*

1.2 OMP Manual Revision Status:Verify the latest applicable revision status includingtemporary revisions, appendices and supplements ofDocs listed in 2.

*

1.3 Airworthiness Directives /LTA/LTH List:Preparation of AD List from State of Design, ACG andEASA

*

1.4 Approved Maintenance Programme: *

1.5 Bordbuch / Flugaufzeichnungen *1.6 *

2 REVIEWDocuments

2.1 Maintenance Manual Airframe:Doc. No.:Revision:Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP

*

2.2 Maintenance Manual Engine:

Doc. No.:Revision:Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP

*

2.3 Maintenance Manual Propeller:Doc. No.:Revision:Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP

*

2.4 Maintenance Manual others:Doc. No.:Revision:Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP

*

3 Documents / Programs3.1A Pilot Reports / Tech Log Review

Filtered for "High Trend"Critical ATA (e.g. 26, 27, 32, 34, 78)Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation intoOMP




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Org./Owner:No. Description Comply Remarks

Yes No

3.1B Störungsmeldungen

Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation intoOMP if necessary for technical and operational defectnotifications

3.2 Maintenance FindingsFiltered for "High Trend"

Critical ATA (e.g. 26, 27, 32, 34, 78)

Check, establish corrective Actions and incorporation intoOMP

*

3.3 Check Interval VariationPermitted Variations to Maint. Program Frequencies incl.approvals

Check if all Variations are i.a.w. the approved OMPprocedure (Mfr. Or LTH 36/LL26)

3.4 Aircraft/Engine/ PropellerPrevious Maintenance Records:

Review Work Packs, Log books and or RecordSystem to be checked for:

ALI/CMR ComplianceCheck according actual Docs

Airworthiness Directives Status Report ComplianceCheck according prepared Lists

Component Overhaul/Life Limit Status:Details of lives remaining and modification status

*

3.5 Modification Status Report:Check for modifications embodied including approval

status and incorporation into OMP.

*

3.6 Repair and Damage Records:Repairs embodied including approval status

Review Records containing un-repaired damages andincorporation into OMP of repetitive actions.

*

3.7 LTH 40, LTH 29, LTA91, LTA 46 compliance:Check Revision and incorporated any changes into OMP

*

4 Others




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91


Org./Owner:No. Description Comply Remarks

Yes No

4.1 ARC/recommendation for ARC:If applicable

*

5 REVIEW CONCLUSION*

*

6 POST-PROCESSING*

Acting Persons: Function:

Date:




DC_LFA_TEO_001_v2_0 28.10.2009 of 91

5.2 List of airworthiness review staff

Airworthiness Review StaffAirworthiness Review Authorisation Reference

Max MustermannARS-(Org. name)-001

Michi MustermannARS-(Org. name)-002

Martin MustermannARS-(Org. name)-003

Extension Aircraft Type

X X X Cessna 152

X X X Cessna 210

X X XCessna 337

X X X Piper P28A

X X X Challenger 300

x X X Learjet 60

5.2.1 Airworthiness review staff authorisation

The authorisation schould contain:

• Organisation´s name• Approval number of the organisation

• Authorisation number of the airworthiness review staff

• Date of issuance

• Personal data (Name of staff, date of birth, address)

• Granted aircraft types for the review

• Signature of issuing personal




5.3 List of approved maintenance organisations contracted

5.4 List of contracts with owners/operators and their aircraft

…(organisation’s name) CAMO is responsible to manage the continuingairworthiness, as contracted of the following aircraft:

Owner/Operator AMP Reg. Manufacturer Type S/NDate ofcontract

Depending on the number of aircraft, this paragraph should be updated as follows:

The paragraph is revised each time an aircraft is removed from or added in the list.Every time a change is performed, the PCA will send this list to ACG for information.

5.5 Holders of AMP’s

A copy of the aircraft maintenance programme will be held by:

Copynumber

Receiver Publication form

1. Austro Control GmbH

2. Owner/operator3. Nominated post holder for continuing airworthiness4. Contracted approved maintenance oganisation

5.6 List of sub-contractors

5.7 Copy of contracts with approved maintenance organisations

5.8 Copy of contracts for sub-contracted work

5.9 Copy of contracts for the provision of maintenance data by theowner or operator

Sample CAME

Documents

Transcript of Sample CAME