Saliva and Its Scretion

Saliva and the Control of Its Secretion

Jorgen Ekstrom, Nina Khosravani, Massimo Castagnola,and Irene Messana

Contents

1 Functions of Saliva: An Overview......................... 20

2 Major and Minor Salivary Glands and MixedSaliva ......................................................................... 21

3 Spontaneous, Resting,and Stimulated Secretion ........................................ 22

4 The Salivary Response Displays Circadianand Circannual Rhythms........................................ 23

5 The Diversity of the Salivary Response................ 23

6 Afferent Stimuli for Secretion................................ 24

7 Efferent Stimuli for Secretion ................................ 25

8 Autonomic Transmitters and Receptors............... 26

9 Secretory Units......................................................... 26

10 Fluid and Protein Secretion ................................... 26

11 Myoepithelial Cell Contraction.............................. 28

12 Blood Flow................................................................ 28

13 Salivary Centers....................................................... 29

14 Efferent Nerves ........................................................ 29

15 Sensory Nerves of Glandular Origin .................... 30

16 Hormones.................................................................. 30

17 Trophic Effects of Nerves: Gland Sensitivityto Chemical Stimuli and Gland Size ..................... 31

18 Ageing........................................................................ 32

19 Xerostomia, Salivary Gland Hypofunction,and Dry Mouth ........................................................ 32

20 Causes of Dry Mouth .............................................. 33

21 Treatment of Dry Mouth ........................................ 34

22 Sialorrhea.................................................................. 34

23 Protein Components of Human Salivaand Posttranslational Modifications ...................... 35

24 The Salivary Proteome ........................................... 35

25 Polymorphism of the Salivary Proteome.............. 38

26 Physiological Variability ......................................... 39

27 Function of Salivary Proteins ................................ 40

28 Pathological Modifications...................................... 41

References .......................................................................... 42

Abstract

The various functions of salivaamong them diges-tive, protective and trophic onesnot just limited tothe mouth, and the relative contribution of thedifferent types of gland to the total volume secretedas well as to various secretory rhythms over time arediscussed. Salivary reflexes, afferent and efferentpathways, as well as the action of classical andnon-classical transmission mechanisms regulatingthe activity of the secretory elements and blood

J. Ekstrm (&) N. KhosravaniDepartment of Pharmacology,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology,Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg,Box 431, SE-405 30 Gteborg, Swedene-mail: [email protected]

M. CastagnolaIstituto di Biochimica e Biochimica Clinica,Facolt di Medicina, Universit Cattolicaand Istituto per la Chimica del RiconoscimentoMolecolare, CNR, 00168 Rome, Italy

I. MessanaDipartimento di Scienze Applicate ai Biosistemi,Universit di Cagliari, Cittadella UniversitariaMonserrato, 09042 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy

O. Ekberg (ed.), Dysphagia, Medical Radiology. Diagnostic Imaging, DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_481, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

19

vessels are in focus. Sensory nerves of glandularorigin and an involvement in gland inflammation arediscussed. Although, the glandular activities areprincipally regulated by nerves, recent findings of anacute influence of gastro-intestinal hormones onsaliva composition and metabolism, are paid atten-tion to, suggesting, in addition to the cephalicnervous phase, both a regulatory gastric and intes-tinal phase. The influence of nerves and hormones inthe long-term perspective as well as old age,diseases and consumption of pharmaceutical drugson the glands and their secretion are discussed withfocus on xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunc-tion. Treatment options of dry mouth are presentedas well as an explanation to the troublesomeclozapine-induced sialorrhea. Final sections of thischapter describe the families of secretory salivaryproteins and highlight the most recent resultsobtained in the study of the human salivary prote-ome. Particular emphasis is given to the post-translational modifications occurring to salivaryproteins before and after secretion, to the polymor-phisms observed in the different protein families andto the physiological variations, with a major concernto those detected in the pediatric age. Functionsexerted by the different families of salivary proteinsand the potential use of human saliva for prognosticand diagnostic purposes are finally discussed.

1 Functions of Saliva: An Overview

Saliva exerts digestive and protective functionsand a number of other functions, depending on the spe-cies, usually grouped under the heading additionalfunctions. Digestive functions include the mechanicalhandling of food such as chewing, bolus formation, andswallowing. The chemical degradation of food is byamylase and lipasethese enzymes continue to exerttheir activities in the stomach, amylase exerting itsactivity until the acid penetrates the bolus. The group ofdigestive functions also includes the process of dissolv-ing the tastants, and thus allowing them to interact withthe taste buds. If pleasant, taste sets up a secretory reflexof gastric acid as part of the cephalic regulation of gastricsecretion. To the protective functions belong the lubri-cation of the oral structures by mucins, the dilution of hotor cold food, and spicy food, the ability of the buffer

(by bicarbonate, phosphates, and protein) to maintainsalivary pH around 7.0 (note that in many laboratoryanimals, the pH is higher, 8.59.0), the remineralizationof enamel by calcium, the antimicrobial defense actionby immunoglobulin A, a-defensins, and b-defensins, andwound healing by growth-stimulating factors such asepidermal growth hormone, statherines, and histatines.Additionally, saliva is necessary for articulate speech, forexcretion (as discussed below), and for social interac-tions (such as kissing). Moreover, saliva exerts trophiceffects. It maintains the number of taste buds. Further, ithas recently become apparent that the composition ofsaliva secreted during fetal life may be of importance forthe development of oral structures (Jenkins 1978;Tenouvo 1998; Mese and Matsuo 2007; Inzitari et al.2009; Castagnola et al. 2011a). It has already beenmentioned that the salivary enzymes accompanying thebolus are still active in the stomach. There are furtherexamples of the fact that the action of saliva is notrestricted to the mouth. Swallowed saliva protects theesophageal wall from being damaged by regurgitatinggastric acid as is the case with a lowered tone of the loweresophageal sphincter (Shafik et al. 2005). The defensemechanisms of saliva protect the upper as well as thelower respiratory tract from infectious agents (Fig. 1).

Although the exocrine function of the salivary glandsis in focus, it is worth noting that salivary glands have, inaddition, excretory and possibly endocrine functions.Circulating non-protein-bound fractions of hormones,such as of melatonin, cortisol, and sex steroids, passivelymove into the saliva, as do a number of pharmaceuticaldrugs (Grschl 2009). Interestingly, melatonin, when inthe oral cavity, exerts antioxidative, immunomodula-tory, and anticancerogenic effects (Cutando et al. 2007).Iodide is actively taken up by the glands by the sametransport system as in the thyroid gland, a situation thatmay be deleterious for the salivary glands if the iodideis radioactive and is used in the treatment of thyroidtumors (Mandel and Mandel 2003). Salivary substancesmay appear in the blood as indicated by amylase andepidermal growth factor, which suggests endocrinefunctions of the glands (Isenman et al. 1999).

In animals, saliva may be secreted to lower the bodytemperature by evaporative cooling (panting of dogs andspreading of saliva on the scrotum and the fur by rats), forgrooming (rats and cats) and, by salivary pheromones, tomark territory or to attract mates (mice and pigs); partic-ularly, sex steroids of the saliva serve as olfactory signals(Gregersen 1931; Hainsworth 1967; Grschl 2009).

20 J. Ekstrom et al.

2 Major and Minor Salivary Glandsand Mixed Saliva

Saliva is produced by three pairs of major glands, theparotids, the submandibulars, and the sublinguals,located outside the mouth, and hundreds of minor

glandseach the size of a pinhead and located justbelow the oral epithelium (Figs. 2 and 3). As judgedby magnetic resonance imaging, the volume of theparotid gland is about 2.5 times that of the sub-mandibular gland and eight times that of the sublin-gual gland (Ono et al. 2006). Similar relationships areobtained when the comparisons are based on gland

Fig. 2 Parotid gland andaccessory gland. (Withpermission from Elsevier)

Fig. 1 Functions of saliva

Saliva and the Control of Its Secretion 21

weights, the parotid gland weighing 1530 g (Gray1988). The saliva from the parotid and submandibularglands reaches the oral cavity via long excretory ducts(7 and 5 cm, respectively), the parotid duct (alsocalled Stensens duct) opening at the level of thesecond upper molar, and the submandibular duct(Whartons duct) opening on the sublingual papilla. Inabout 20% of the population, the parotid duct is sur-rounded by a small accessory gland. Sublingual salivaempties into the submandibular duct via the majorsublingual duct (Bartholins duct) or directly into themouth via a number of small excretory ducts openingon the sublingual folder. Likewise, the saliva of minorglands, such as of the buccal, palatine (located just inthe soft palate), labial, lingual, and molar glands,empties into the mouth directly via small, separateducts just traversing the epithelium (Tandler and Riva1986). Unless saliva is collected directly from thecannulated duct, the saliva in the mouth will becontaminated by the gingival crevicular fluid, bloodcells, microbes, antimicrobes, cell and food debris,and nasopharyngeal secretion. Consequently, mixedsaliva (whole saliva) collected by spitting ordrooling is not pure saliva, although the term salivais usually used.

3 Spontaneous, Resting,and Stimulated Secretion

Some salivary glands have an inherent capability tosecrete saliva (Emmelin 1967). The type of gland dif-fers among different species. In humans, only the minorglands secrete saliva spontaneously. Although theseglands are innervated and may increase their secretoryrate in response to nervous activity, they secrete salivaat a low rate, without exogenous influence during thenight. In daytime and at rest, a nervous reflex drivesetup by low-grade mechanical stimuli due to movementsof the tongue and lips, and mucosal drynessacts onthe secretory cells, particularly engaging the sub-mandibular gland (Fig. 4). In the clinic, the salivasecreted at rest is often called unstimulated secre-tion, despite the involvement of nervous activity.With respect to stimulated secretion, the parotid con-tribution becomes more dominant: in response to strongstimuli, such as citric acid, the flow rate is about equal tothat from the submandibular gland, whereas inresponse to chewing, the flow rate is twice as high asthat from the submandibular gland. The total volume ofsaliva secreted amounts to 12 L per 24 h. The flow rate

Fig. 3 Submandibular andsublingual glands. Note themany small ducts from thesublingual gland. (Withpermission from Elsevier)


correlates with gland size, and is higher in males than infemales (Heintze et al. 1983). The relative contribu-tions of each type of gland to the total volume secretedare as follows: roughly 30% for the parotid glands, 60%for the submandibular glands, 5% for the sublingualglands, and 5% for the minor glands (Dawes and Wood1973). Different types of glands produce differenttypes of secretion. Depending on the reaction to thehistochemical staining of the acinar cells for light-microscopy examination, the cells are classified as(basophilic) serous or (eosinophilic) mucous cells.The serous cells are filled with protein-storing granulesand are associated with the secretion of water andenzymes, whereas the mucous cells are associated withthe secretion of the viscous mucins stored in vacuoles.The parotid gland is characterized as a serous gland, thesubmandibular gland is characterized as a seromucousgland (10% mucous cells and 90% serous cells), andthe sublingual gland and most of the minor glands are

characterized as mucous glands. The deep posteriorlingual glands (von Ebners glands), found in circum-vallate and foliate papillae close to most of the taste buds,are, however, of the serous type. Though, the contribu-tion of the minor glands is small, they continuously,during day and night, provide the surface of the oralstructures with a protective layer of mucin-rich saliva thatprevents the feeling of mouth dryness from occurring.Together with the sublingual glands, they are responsiblefor 80% of the total mucin secretion per 24 h.

4 The Salivary Response DisplaysCircadian and Circannual Rhythms

On the whole, the flow rate of resting as well as ofstimulated saliva is higher in the afternoon than inthe morning (Ferguson and Botchway 1980; Dawes1975), the peak occurring in the middle of the after-noon. Also the salivary protein concentration followsthis diurnal pattern. In addition, the flow of the restingsaliva is higher during winter than during summer,indicating a circannual rhythm (Elishoov et al.2008). Just a small change in the ambient tempera-ture (by 2 C) in a warm climate is enough toinversely affect the flow rate (Kariyawasam andDawes 2005).

5 The Diversity of the SalivaryResponse

Pavlov drew attention to the fact that the volume ofsaliva secreted and its composition vary in a seem-ingly purposeful way in response to the physical andchemical nature of the stimulus (see Babkin 1950).Not only does the secretion adapt acutely to thestimulus, but also long-term demands may inducechanges in gland size and secretory capacity. Thevariety in the salivary response is attained by theinvolvement of different types of glands, differenttypes of cells within a gland, different types ofreflexes displaying variations in intensity, duration,and engagement of the two divisions of the autonomicinnervation, different types of transmitter and varyingtransmitter ratios, different types of receptors, andvarious intracellular pathways either running in par-allel or interacting synergistically (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4 Different rates of salivary flow


6 Afferent Stimuli for Secretion

Eating is a strong stimulus for the secretion of saliva(Hector and Linden 1999). A number of sensoryreceptors are activated in response to food intake:gustatory receptors, mechanoreceptors, nociceptors,and olfactory receptors (Fig. 5). All four modes oftaste (sour, salt, sweet, and bitter) elicit secretion(gustatory salivary reflex) but sour, followed bysalt, is the most effective stimulus. Taste buds residein the papillae of the tongue. The sensation of salt is

particularly experienced at the tip of the tongue andthat of bitter at the dorsum of the tongue, whereas thesensations of sweet and sour are experienced inbetween. Regions other than the tongue, in particularthe soft palate, but also the epiglottis, the esophagus,the nasopharynx, and the buccal wall, also containareas of taste buds. Chewing causes the teeth to movesideways, thereby stimulating mechanoreceptors ofthe periodontal ligaments (masticatory salivaryreflex). In addition, gingival mucosal tissuemechanoreceptors are activated during chewing.Olfactory receptors are located at the cribriform plate,

Fig. 5 Afferent and efferentnerves, and various elementsof salivary glands


i.e., at the roof of the nasal cavity, and they respond tovolatile molecules of the nasal and the retronasalairflow (the latter arising from the oral cavity or thepharynx). Sniffing increases the airflow and therebythe access of stimuli to the receptor area. The epi-thelium containing the olfactory receptors has a richblood supply. Interestingly, blood-borne odorantsmay pass through the vessel walls and stimulate thesereceptors. The submandibular glands, but not theparotid glands, are regulated by an olfactory salivaryreflex. Irritating odors, do, however, mobilize theparotid gland, in addition to the submandibular gland,in this case in response to the stimulation of epithelialtrigeminal irritant receptors. The nociceptors mayalso be activated in response to spicy food (e.g., chillipepper). Thermal stimuli also influence the rate ofsecretion. Ice-cold drinks cause a greater volume ofsaliva to be produced than do hot drinks (Dawes et al.2000). Dryness of the mucosa acts as yet anotherstimulus for secretion (dry mouth reflex; Cannon1937). Salivary secretion as a consequence of pain isa well-known phenomenon, and both pain receptorsand mechanoreceptors may cause secretion elicited byesophageal distension due to swallowing dysfunctions(Sarosiek et al. 1994). When applied unilaterally, thestimulus may evoke secretion from the glands of bothsides. However, the secretory response is more pro-nounced on the stimulated side. Afferent signalsarising from the anterior part of the tongue preferen-tially engage the submandibular gland, whereas sig-nals arising from the lateral and posterior partspreferentially engage the parotid gland (Emmelin1967). Patients suffering from chronic gastroesopha-geal reflux of acid may experience salivation inresponse toacid directly hitting the muscle layers of a damagedesophageal wall (esophageal salivary reflex; Helmet al. 1987). This reflex is also elicited in healthysubjects (Shafik et al. 2005). Salivation is part of thevomiting reflex set up by a number of stimuli,including distension of the stomach and duodenum aswell as of chemical stimuli acting locally or centrally.The phenomenon of conditioned reflexes has beentightly associated with salivary secretion since thepioneering work by Pavlov on dogs. In humans,however, it is difficult to establish conditioned sali-vary reflexes to sight, sound, or anticipation of food.The feeling of mouth watering at the sight of anappetizing meal is attributed to anticipatory tongue

and lip movements as well as to an awareness ofpreexisting saliva in the mouth (Hector and Linden1999).

7 Efferent Stimuli for Secretion

Since the days of the ninetieth century pioneers ofexperimental medicine who were exploring the actionof nerves, the secretion of saliva has been thought to besolely under nervous control (Garrett 1998). Recentstudies, however, imply an acute role for hormonesin the regulation of saliva composition (see below). Thesecretory elements (acinar, duct, and myoepithelialcells) of the gland are invariable richly supplied withparasympathetic nerves. The sympathetic innervation

Fig. 6 Acinar cells: transmitters, receptors, and intracellularpathways


differs in intensity between the glands, however. Inhumans, the secretory elements of the parotid glandsare reported to be supplied with fewer sympatheticnerves than the submandibular glands, and the labialglands are thought to lack a sympathetic secretoryinnervation (Rossoni et al. 1979). The parasympatheticinnervation is responsible for the secretion oflarge volumes of saliva, whereas, in the event of asympathetic secretory innervation, the sympatheticallynerve-evoked flow of saliva is usually sparse. Both theparasympathetic and the sympathetic innervationscause the secretion of proteins. Whereas gustatoryreflexes activate both types of autonomic nerves,masticatory reflexes preferentially involve the activityof the parasympathetic innervation (Jensen Kjeilenet al. 1987). Since the accompanying flow of saliva ismuch greater in response to parasympathetic stimula-tion than to sympathetic stimulation, the salivaryprotein concentration is lower in parasympathetic sal-iva than in sympathetic saliva. In case of a doubleinnervation of the secretory cells, parasympathetic andsympathetic nerves interact synergistically with respectto the response (Emmelin 1987). The secretion ofsaliva requires a large water supply from the circula-tion. Parasympathetic activity causes vasodilation, andthe glandular blood flow may increase 20-fold.

8 Autonomic Transmittersand Receptors

Traditionally, acetylcholine is the parasympatheticpostganglionic transmitter and noradrenaline thesympathetic postganglionic transmitter that act on thesecretory elements of the glands (Fig. 6). Noradren-aline acts on a1-adrenoceptors and b1-adrenoceptors,whereas acetylcholine acts on muscarinic M1 and M3receptors. The parasympathetic nerve of the salivaryglands has been found to use other transmissionmechanisms besides the cholinergic one, i.e., pepti-dergic (vasoactive intestinal peptide, calcitonin-gene-related peptide, substance P, neurokinin A,neuropeptide Y) and nitrergic (nitric oxide, NO)mechanisms (Ekstrm 1999a). The cotransmitters toacetylcholine may, on their own, evoke secretoryeffects and potentiate the acetylcholine-evokedresponses (Ekstrm 1987). For instance, vasoactiveintestinal peptide causes the secretion of proteinswith no (or little) fluid. However, in concert with

acetylcholine, both the protein and the fluid secretionare enhanced by vasoactive intestinal peptide.Although the parasympathetic innervation of the sal-ivary glands contains the NO synthesizing enzymeNO synthase, NO of parasympathetic origin does notseem to take part in the regulation of the secretoryactivity. Instead, NO of intracellular origin ismobilized, and particularly upon sympathetic nerveactivity (Ekstrm et al. 2007). With respect to theparasympathetic-evoked vasodilator response, bothvasoactive intestinal peptide and NO, besides acetyl-choline, are involved.

9 Secretory Units

The glands are divided into lobules, each lobuleconsisting of a number of secretory units composed ofacini and ducts. The acini, the lumen of which issurrounded by the secretory cells, form a blind end,and the saliva produced passes through intercalated,intralobular, and excretory ducts before finally emp-tying into a main excretory duct; on its way throughthe duct system, the primary saliva is modified.

10 Fluid and Protein Secretion

Fluid and protein secretion is an active, energy-dependent process. The acinar cells are responsiblefor the secretion of fluid. They are also responsible formost of the protein secretion, whereas the duct cellscontribute to a minor proportion of the total proteinoutput. Large volumes of water are transported fromthe interstitium to the lumen by paracellular andtranscellular passages in response to the osmotic forceexercised by intraluminal NaCl. An intracellular risein calcium concentration opens basolateral channelsfor potassium and apical channels for chloride.Potassium leaves the cell for the interstitium andchloride leaves the cell for the lumen. Next, theluminal increase in chloride concentration dragssodium, via paracellular transport, from the interstitiumto the lumen and, as a result, water will move alongthe osmotic gradient produced by NaCl (Poulsen1998; Melvin et al. 2005) (Fig. 7a and b).

The primary isotonic saliva formed in the aciniundergoes changes during its passage through theduct system. The water permeability of the ducts is


extremely small. Sodium and chloride are reabsorbedwithout accompanying water. A certain secretion ofpotassium and bicarbonate occurs at a lower rate thanthe rate of reabsorption of sodium and chloride.Consequently, the so-called secondary saliva thatenters the mouth is hypotonic. The low salivarysodium concentration, one fifth of that of the primarysaliva, makes it possible for the taste buds to detectsalt at low concentrations.

The permeability of the duct system may increaseunder conditions that elevate the blood level of cir-culating catecholamines, released from the adrenalmedulla, as illustrated by the appearance of glucose inthe saliva in response to cold stress, mental stress, andphysical exercise (Borg-Anderson et al. 1992; Teesaluand Roosalu 1993).

Immunoglobulins, in particular immunoglobu-lin A, are transported across the epithelial cells ofacini and ducts. They are formed by plasma cellswithin the gland. After release to the interstitium, theyform a complex with polymeric immunoglobulinreceptor, which serves as transporter (Brandtzaeg2009), a complex that splits in the saliva.

The secretion of proteins is of two types (Gorret al. 2005). The constitutive (vesicular) secretionis a direct release of proteins as soon as they are

synthesized by the Golgi vesicles. The constitutivesecretion is responsible for a continuous secretion ofseveral proteins without any ongoing external stimuli.The constitutive secretion is, however, also influenced

Fig. 7 a Acinar cells: water and protein secretion via vesicular and granular pathwaysprimary secretion. b Duct cells:modifications of salivasecondary secretion

Fig. 8 Serous acinus of a human submandibular glandfilled with secretory granules. Osmium maceration method.Magnification 92,500. (Courtesy of Alessandro Riva, CagliariUniversity)


by the nervous activity and, upon intense and pro-longed stimulation, the importance of this pathwaywill increase concomitantly with the depletion ofgranules, as demonstrated experimentally (Garrett andThulin 1975). Granular secretion is the regulated typeof secretion. After synthesis, the proteins are stored ingranules (Fig. 8). Upon stimulation, the granulesempty their content of proteins into the lumen, i.e.,the secretion occurs by exocytosis. The various routesfor secretion may allow variations in the compositionof the secretions (Ekstrm et al. 2009). Mobilizationof the intracellular messenger adenosine 30,50-cyclicmonophosphate (cAMP) by stimulation of b1-adren-ergic receptors and vasoactive intestinal peptidereceptors is associated with protein secretion byexocytosis and a small volume response. Mobilizationof the intracellular messenger Ca2+ by stimulation ofmuscarinic receptors (M1, M3) and a1-adrenergicreceptors is associated with fluid secretionandparticularly large volumes in response to muscarinicagonistsand protein secretion via vesicular secre-tion and, with intense stimulation, also via exocytosis(Ekstrm 2002). In acinar cells, agonists using cAMPmay activate NO synthase of neuronal type but ofnonneuronal origin to generate NO, which catalyzesthe formation of guanosine 30,50-cyclic monophos-phate (cGMP) (Sayardoust and Ekstrm 2003). TheNO/cGMP pathway may contribute to the proteinsecretion partly by prolonging the action of cAMP(Imai et al. 1995), partly by catalyzing the generationof cyclic adenosine diphosphate ribose, whichtriggers the release of Ca2+ by its action on ryanodine-

sensitive receptors of intracellular Ca2+ stores(Gallacher and Smith 1999) (Fig. 7).

The combined mobilization of Ca2+ and cAMPresults in synergistic interactions with respect toboth fluid and protein secretion (Ekstrm 1999a).Moreover, the two sets of autonomic innervations arealso involved in protein synthesis. The nonadrenergic,noncholinergic mechanisms play a major role inparasympathetically nerve-induced protein synthesis(Ekstrm et al. 2000). The sympathetically nerve-induced protein synthesis is exerted via the two typesof adrenergic receptors with a predominance forb-adrenergic receptors (Sayardoust and Ekstrm2004). Importantly, the parasympathetic nonadrener-gic, noncholinergic mechanisms have been shown totake part in the regulation of salivary gland activitiesunder reflex activation due to taste and chewing(Ekstrm 1998, 2001; Ekstrm and Reinhold 2001).

11 Myoepithelial Cell Contraction

Myoepithelial cells display characteristics in commonwith both smooth muscle cells and epithelial cells.They embrace acini and ducts (Fig. 9). They receive adual innervation, and both muscarinic receptors anda1-adrenergic receptors cause the cells to contract; insome species, tachykinins also cause contraction(Garrett and Emmelin 1979). Myoepithelial cell con-traction increases the ductal pressure, which may be ofimportance for the flow of high-viscosity mucin-richsaliva and for overcoming various obstacles to theflow. Moreover, the contraction of the myoepithelialcells may play a supportive role for the underlyingparenchyma, particularly at a high rate of secretion.

12 Blood Flow

Salivary glands are supplied with a dense capillarynetwork comparable with that of the heart (Edwards1988; Smaje 1998). The capillaries are extremelypermeable to water and solutes but not to macro-molecules such as albumin. Parasympatheticallyinduced vasodilatation may generate a 20-foldincrease in gland blood flow, which ensures thesecretory cells produce large volumes of saliva over along period of time. The parasympathetic transmittervasoactive intestinal peptide, besides acetylcholine,

Fig. 9 Myoepithelial cells on the surface of, and embracing, ahuman parotid acinus. NaOH maceration method. Scanningelectron microscope image, magnification 92,000. (Courtesy ofAlessandro Riva, Cagliari University)


plays a major role in the vasodilator response, whichalso involves the action of NO. Stimulation of thesympathetic innervation causes vasoconstriction bya1-adrenergic receptors and neuropeptide Y receptors.However, the sympathetic innervation of the bloodvessels of the gland is activated not in response to ameal but in response to a profound fall in systemicblood pressure in order to restore the blood pressure.The sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerve fibers origi-nate from the vasomotor center and are separatedfrom the sympathetic secretomotor nerve fibers takingpart in alimentary reflexes (Emmelin and Engstrm1960). Interestingly, the sympathetic nerve fibersinnervating the blood vessels contain the potentconstrictor transmitter neuropeptide Y, whereas thesympathetic secretomotor fibers lack this peptide(Ekstrm et al. 1996; Ekstrm 1999a, b).

13 Salivary Centers

The parasympathetic salivary center is located in themedulla oblongata and is divided into a superior andan inferior salivatory nucleus, and, in addition,an intermediate zone. The superior nucleus connects(the facial nerve) with the submandibular and thesublingual glands, whereas the inferior nucleus con-nects (the glossopharyngeal nerve) with the parotidgland (Emmelin 1967; Matsuo 1999). The inter-mediate zone makes connections with both thesubmandibular gland and the parotid gland. Thesympathetic salivary center resides in the upper tho-racic segments of the spinal cord. Higher centers ofthe brain exert both excitatory (glutamate) andinhibitory (c- aminobutyric acid and glycine) influ-ences on the salivary centers. The inhibitory influenceis illustrated by the reduced flow of saliva associatedwith depression, fever, sleep, and emotional stress.Mouth dryness in response to stress is not a conse-quence of sympathetic activity: there are no inhibitorysympathetic fibers innervating the secretory cells(Garrett 1988).

14 Efferent Nerves

The parasympathetic preganglionic nerve fibers of thesubmandibular and sublingual glands leave the facialnerve and join, via the chorda tympani nerve, the

lingual nerve to form the chorda-lingual nerve toreach the submandibular ganglion. The postganglionicnerve fibers of the submandibular ganglion innervatethe submandibular and sublingual parenchyma (Rhoand Deschler 2005). In humans, this ganglion islocated outside the parenchyma of the two glands,which is in contrast to the intraglandular localizationin many laboratory animals. The parasympatheticpreganglionic nerve fibers of the parotid gland travelvia the tympanic branch of the glossopharyngealnerve (Jacobsons nerve), the tympanic plexus, andthe lesser superficial petrosal nerve and, after relayingin the otic ganglion, the postganglionic nerve fibersare usually thought to reach the gland via the auric-ulotemporal nerve. With respect to the preganglionicinnervation of the parotid gland, reflex studies suggestthat not only fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve butalso fibers of the facial nerve (chorda tympani nerve)contribute, since cutting the chorda tympani nerve inthe tympanic membrane reduces the response(Reicher and Poth 1933; Diamant and Wiberg 1965).The routes of the postganglionic cholinergic nervefibers may differ as judged by extensive animalstudies. Cholinergic nerve fibers may detach at anearly stage from the auriculotemporal nerve, to reachthe gland via the internal maxillary artery. Moreover,and in contrast to the general textbook view, the facialnerve passing through the parotid gland parenchyma,with its twigs, supplies the secretory cells with acholinergic innervation that takes part in the reflexsecretion (Ekstrm and Holmberg 1972; Khosravaniet al. 2006; Khosravani and Ekstrm 2006). The facialnerve is therefore a potential contributor to thedevelopment of Frey syndrome (Dunbar et al. 2002).Frey syndrome is characterized by sweating, redness,flushing, and warming over the parotid region wheneating. It develops over a period of months followingparotid gland surgery, neck dissection, blunt traumato the cheek, and chronic infection of the parotid area.It is considered to be due to aberrant regeneration ofpostganglionic parasympathetic cholinergic nervefibers of the auriculotemporal nerve that innervatesweat glands and skin vessels following loss of thesympathetic postganglionic cholinergic innervationbut may, in the light of a secretory role for the facialnerve, also involve regenerating parasympatheticpostganglionic cholinergic nerve fibers of the facialnerve. Since botulinus toxin, preventing transmitterexocytosis, is more effective than the muscarinic


receptor antagonist atropine in the treatment of thesyndrome, a cotransmitter or cotransmitters to ace-tycholine is/are likely to contribute to the symptoms;vasoactive intestinal peptide is such a cotransmitter(Drummond 2002).

The routes of the parasympathetic nerves of theminor glands (Tandler and Riva 1986) are via thebuccal branch of the mandibular nerve with respect tothe molar, buccal, and labial glands (postganglionicnerves originate from the otic ganglion), via the lin-gual nerve with respect to the lingual glands(Remaks ganglia, intralingually located), and via thepalatine nerve with respect to palatine glands (sphe-noplatine ganglion).

The sympathetic preganglionic nerve fibers ascendin the paravertebral sympathetic trunk to synapse withtheir postganglionic nerve fibers in the superior cer-vical ganglion, which then reach the glands via thearteries. However, their actual anatomical pathwaysare not completely defined, e.g., the parotid glandmay be reached both via the external carotid arteryand via intracranial routes (Garrett 1988).

15 Sensory Nerves of Glandular Origin

Pain in the salivary gland region is a well-knownphenomenon in response to gland swelling uponinflammation or sialolithiasis. Although the pain isusually attributed to an increase in the intercapsulartension and activation of afferent nerves of the glan-dular fascia (Shapiro 1973; Leipzig and Obert 1979),sensory nerves occur in the glands and are thereforelikely to be involved in the response. Nerve fibersshowing colocalization of substance P and calcitonin-gene-related peptide are of sensory origin, and in theglands, these fibers are present in close connectionwith ducts and blood vessels (Ekstrm et al. 1988).The facial nerve and the great auricular nerve arepathways for nerves of this type of the parotidgland, originating from the trigeminal ganglion anddorsal root ganglia, respectively (Khosravani et al.2006, 2008); in addition, the great auricular nerveinnervates the parotid fascia (Zohar et al. 2002). Thelingual nerve is thought to supply the submandibularand sublingual glands with sensory fibers of trigemi-nal origin. The periductal sensory nerves may serveprotective functions. They may release defensesubstances from the duct cells (such as b-defensins)

and by causing the myoepithelal cells to contract,noxious substances may be expelled and ductal dis-tension may be overcome. Both substance P andcalcitonin-gene-related peptide evoke protein extrav-asation and periglandular edema. Therefore, the per-ivascular sensory nerve fibers may be involved ingland swelling and gland inflammation. A role forsensory nerves in chronic inflammation has beenpointed out, for instance, in asthma. In analogy, theremight be a role for these nerves in chronic salivarygland inflammation. The levels of both substance Pand calcitonin-gene-related peptide increase follow-ing extirpation of the superior cervical ganglion(Ekstrm and Ekman 2005), a phenomenon that maybe associated with the clinical condition of parotidpostsympathectomy pain upon eating (Schon 1985).

16 Hormones

Animal experiments demonstrate a long-term influ-ence of sex steroids, growth hormone, and thyroidhormones on salivary gland metabolism, morphology,and secretory capacity (Johnson 1988). In humans, thedevelopment of postmenopausal hyposalivationillustrates the consequence of the loss of the contin-uous influence of estrogen and progesterone (Meur-man et al. 2009). The opposite, i.e., excessivesalivation, has been reported during pregnancy (Jen-kins 1978). Apart from the effect of circulating cate-cholamines from the adrenal medulla in response tosympathetic activity, little attention has been paid to ashort-term hormonal influence on the glands and theirsecretion. Aldosterone-induced ductal uptake ofsodium (without water), lowering the sodium con-centration of the saliva, is a well-known phenomenonin the parotid gland of the sheep, but in humans theeffect of aldosterone is small (Blair-West et al. 1967).Recent animal investigations on the effect of somegastrointestinal hormonesgastrin, cholecystokinin,and melatonin, the latter found in large amounts in theintestinesdo, however, imply that the secretoryactivity of salivary glands, like other exocrine glandsof the digestive tract, are under the control of bothnerves and hormones, and that the secretion from thesalivary glands can be divided into three separatephases depending on the location from where thestimulus for secretion arises during a meal (CevikAras and Ekstrm 2006, 2008; Ekstrm and Cevik


Aras 2008; Cevik Aras et al. 2011). Thus, in additionto the well-known cephalic phase (nerves), a gastricphase (gastrin) and an intestinal phase (cholecysto-kinin and melatonin) may regulate salivary glandsecretion. The hormones cause the secretion of pro-teins and stimulate the synthesis of secretory proteinsbut have little effect on the volume response. Ongoingstudies show that human glands, like animal glands,are supplied with receptors for the three hormonesand further, in vitro, release proteins from pieces ofhuman gland tissues upon administration of the hor-mones (Riva et al. 2010).

Gastrointestinal hormones such as cholecystoki-nin, gastrin, and melatonin exert anti-inflammatoryactions on salivary glands (Cevik Aras and Ekstrm2010).

17 Trophic Effects of Nerves: GlandSensitivity to Chemical Stimuliand Gland Size

When the amount of a drug required to elicit a certainsubmaximal biological response diminishes, the tissueis referred to as being supersensitive (Emmelin 1965;Ekstrm 1999b). Salivary glands, in particular, havebeen used as model organs to explore the phenome-non of supersensitivity. Depriving the glands of theirreceptor stimulation by trauma, surgery, or the phar-macological action of drugs results in the gradualdevelopment of denervation supersensitivity. The

sensitization is most pronounced in response to theloss of influence of the postganglionic parasympa-thetic nerve. Restoration of a functional innervationnormalizes the sensitivity. Experimentally, variationsin the gland sensitivity can be brought about in ani-mals supplied with functionally intact reflex arcs byvarying the intensity of the reflex stimulation, thegland subjected to disuse (liquid diet) being moresensitive to stimuli than the gland subjected to over-use (chewing-demanding pelleted diet)thus illus-trating that the state of normal sensitivity is indeeda relative phenomenon (Ekstrm and Templeton1977). Supersensitivity is attributed to intracellularevents rather than to a change in the number ofreceptors on the cell membrane. The phenomenon isusually regarded as nonspecific but it seems, in fact,possible to demonstrate agonist-specific patternsassociated with the degree of disuse of the variousintracellular pathways (Ekstrm 1999b).

As might be expected, under physiological condi-tions the gland size is of primary importance for thevolume response of the gland. Preclinical studiesshow that when the chewing-demanding diet ischanged to a liquid diet in rats, the parotid gland losesabout 50% of its dry weight, the amount of salivasecreted as a response to submaximal muscarinicstimulus is reduced by 40%, and the maximallyevoked muscarinic volume response is reduced by25% (Ekstrm and Templeton 1977). Parasympa-thetic postganglionic denervation causes a profounddecrease in gland weight (by 3040%). However, lossof the action of acetylcholine on the gland is probably

Fig. 10 Physiologicalchanges at old agecontributing to hyposalivation


not the cause: prolonged treatment with the mus-carinic antagonist atropine results in no decrease inweight. Instead parasympathetic nonadrenergic, non-cholinergic transmission mechanisms maintain thegland weight, and induce mitotic activity in the glands(Ekstrm et al. 2007). The nature of the transmitter ortransmitters involved is unknown.

As previously pointed out, salivary glands are sup-plied with b1-adrenergic receptors (Ekstrm 1969);however, the sympathetic system seems to play a minorrole in the regulation of gland size under physiologicalconditions. Although the b-adrenergic agonist iso-prenaline is known to cause gland swelling afterprolonged treatment of asthma and isoprenaline inpreclinical studies is known to increase gland weightsseveralfold (Barka 1965), sympathetic denervationonly slightly, if at all, reduces gland weight. In agree-ment, treatment with the b1-adrenergic receptorantagonist metoprolol causes only a small decrease ingland weight (Ekstrm and Malmberg 1984). It shouldbe noted that the severalfold gain in weight caused byisoprenaline does not correspond to a similar increasein secretory capacity (Ohlin 1966).

18 Ageing

The secretory capacity is usually thought to declinewith age; however, functional data do not supportsuch an assumption (Vissink et al. 1996; Nagler 2004;sterberg et al. 1992). No doubt, the proportion of fatand fibrovascular tissue gradually increases with timeand consequently, the proportion of functionalparenchyma decreases. However, despite these mor-phological changes, the secretory volumes ofunstimulated and stimulated saliva are only slightlyaffected, if at all. With respect to the composition ofsaliva, the individuality of the glands comes to lightsince the parotid saliva composition is consideredunchanged whereas the mucin secretion of themucous/seromucous glands as well as the immuno-globulin A secretion of the labial glands is thought todecrease (Fig. 10).

A number of events associated with ageing willmake salivary gland functions particularly vulnerable,and in concert, these events may eventually haveimplications for the production of the saliva. Forinstance, the intensity of the reflex activity diminishes

owing to reduction in the number of olfactory andtaste receptors as well as loss of teeth; the neuro-glandular junction widens, diminishing the concen-tration of transmitters acting on the receptors; theblood levels of the sex steroids decrease; and theblood perfusion of the glands is reduced. To this listof changes, diseases and pharmaceutical drugs areadded. In 70-year-olds, 64% of women and 55% ofmen were found to be receiving medication in arecent Swedish study; the average number of drugswas 4.0 for women and 3.3 for men (Johanson 2011).

19 Xerostomia, Salivary GlandHypofunction, and Dry Mouth

Usually, the salivary secretion is estimated after anovernight fast or 2 h after a meal (Birkhed andHeintze 1989; Navazesh and Kumar 2008). To collectwhole unstimulated/resting saliva, the subject, sittingin a chair, is instructed to swallow and then to lean thebody forward, allowing the saliva to drip passivelythrough a funnel into an (ice-chilled) graduated(or preweighed) cylinder for 15 min. The stimulatedwhole saliva is usually collected over 5 min:by chewing paraffin wax, usually at a fixed frequency(e.g., 40 or 70 strokes per min); by citric acid appliedeither on the dorsum of the tongue for 30 s or as asolution (2.5%) held in the mouth for 1 min; or bysucking a lemon-flavored candy. The saliva pouringinto the mouth is spat into a cylinder, preferentially atfixed intervals. The secretion is expressed permilliliters per minute or per milligrams per minute(the density of saliva is assumed to be 1.0 g/ml).

In humans, salivary ducts are not usually cannu-lated to measure the flow of saliva from individualglands. However, by applying the LashleyCrittendencup over the orifice of the parotid duct, one canrecord the flow of parotid saliva. Devices of varioustypes have been constructed for the collection ofsubmandibular/sublingual secretionbut here, salivafrom the two types of gland is mixed. By the so-calledPeriotron method, saliva from the minor glands canbe estimated (Eliasson and Carln 2010). A filterpaper is placed over a small area of the oral epithe-lium, and the fluid collected on the filter paper ismeasured using the change in conductance to indicatefluid.


An unstimulated flow rate of whole saliva less than0.1 ml/min and a stimulated flow rate of whole salivaless than 0.7 ml/min are considered to indicate sali-vary gland hypofunction (Ericsson and Hardwick1978). Xerostomia is the subjective sensation ofdryness of the oral mucosa. Importantly, xerostomiaand salivary gland hypofunction may or may not berelated phenomenaonly about 55% of those com-plaining of xerostomia show, by objective measure-ment, a decrease in saliva volume (Field et al. 1997;Longman et al. 1995). The term dry mouth refers tothe oral sensation of dryness with or without thedemonstration of salivary gland hypofunction.

The thickness of the fluid layer covering the oralmucosa varies markedly, being 70 lm at the posteriordorsum of the tongue and 10 lm at the hard palate(DiSabato-Mordaski and Kleinberg 1996; Wolff andKleinberg 1998). The volume of saliva in the mouth isdependent not only on the secretion of saliva but also onevaporation, absorption of fluid through the oralmucosa, and swallowing. Mouth breathing and speak-ing are the main causes of the fluid loss by evaporation;the hard palate with its thin fluid layer is directlyexposed to the flow of inspired air (Thelin et al. 2008).An excess of saliva in the mouth elicits a swallowingreflex. Usually, the volume of saliva that enters themouth at rest exceeds the volume lost by evaporationand swallowing. Despite wide differences in the rate ofunstimulated secretion, a decrease by about 50% of thissecretion in an individual will give rise to the sensationof oral dryness (Dawes 1987; Wolff and Kleinberg1999). In this case, the thickness of the saliva film of theanterior dorsum of the tongue and the hard palate is lessthan 10 lm. It is also from these locations that thesubject experiences the most pronounced symptoms ofxerostomia (Wolff and Kleinberg 1999). A decrease inthe labial secretion by only 20% is correlated to thefeeling of oral dryness (Eliasson et al. 1996).

20 Causes of Dry Mouth

The prevalence of dry mouth is 1540%. The condi-tion is more common among women and increaseswith age (sterberg et al. 1984; Nederfors et al.1997). Dry mouth dramatically impairs the quality oflife (Ship et al. 2002; Wrnberg et al. 2005), and isboth a physical and a social handicap. It is associated

with difficulties in chewing, swallowing, and speak-ing. The lips are cracked and dry. Taste acuityweakens and oral mucosal infections, dental cariesand halitosis develop. Among known causes of drymouth are chronic gland inflammation as Sjgrensyndrome, diabetes, depression, head and neckradiotherapy, radioiodide therapy, HIV/AIDS,orofacial trauma, surgery, and use of medications(Grisius and Fox 1988). Drugs presently in use mayinterfere with the reflexly elicited secretion at thelevel of the central nervous system and/or at the levelof the neuroglandular junction. In this connection, itshould be remembered that the salivary glands areeffectors of the autonomic nervous system and thatthey are supplied with the same set of receptor typesas other effector organs of this system. Consequently,when a dysfunction of an effector within this systemis treated by interfering with the transmission mech-anisms, e.g., overactive urinary bladder (by musca-rinic receptor antagonists) or hypertension (seebelow), the functions of the salivary glands areinvariably influenced. Drugs with antimuscarinicactions cause a marked reduction in the volume ofsaliva produced. Although the volume is not alwayschanged to any great extent, the composition of thesaliva may have undergone changes resulting in thesubjective feeling of oral dryness. The use of drugsbelonging to the cardiovascular category or the psy-chotropic category is particularly correlated with adecreased rate of secretion as a side effect. Antihy-pertensive drugs may block a1- adrenergic receptorsand b1-adrenergic receptors, and stimulate prejunc-tional (neuronal) a2-adrenergic receptors (whichinhibits the transmitter release). Although diuretics inin vitro experiments influence various electrolyteexchange processes in the glands and dry mouth is acommon complaint in response to the treatment withdiuretics, the salivary flow rate in humans is onlyslightly affected, if at all (Atkinson et al. 1989;Nederfors et al. 1989). Oral mucosal tissue dehydra-tion has been suggested as cause of the dry mouthfeeling. Antiarythmics block b1-adrenergic receptorsand exert anticholinergic effects. Apart from thecentral action of antidepressants, this group of drugsblocks peripherally the muscarinic receptors. Anti-psychotics have not only antimuscarinic actions butalso have anti-a1-adrenergic actions. Importantly,when one set of receptor type is blocked, not only is


the response mediated by this particular receptorabolished, but the synergistic interaction provided bythe receptor is also abolished.

Several hundred drugs are said to be xerogenic,and dry mouth is the third most common side effect ofdrug treatment. It is important to realize that referenceguides to drugs causing dry mouth are usually puttogether on the basis of the sensation of oral drynessrather than on the basis of the actual measurement ofthe saliva output. There is a correlation between thetotal intake of the number of drugs and dry mouth(with or without hyposalivation). The use of fourdrugs or more increases the probability that the phe-nomenon of dry mouth will occur. If the number ofdrugs is increased, the chance of consuming a drugproducing dry mouth by itself or by its interactionwith other drugs is likely to increase.

21 Treatment of Dry Mouth

The options to treat dry mouth are, unfortunately,limited and focused on maintaining the salivaryreflexes by flavored gums or lozenges, or by the use ofsalivary substitutes such as artificial saliva, oral rinses,and oral gels. These treatments are of short duration.In addition, scrutiny of the medication list may make itpossible to achieve a reduction in the number of drugstaken by the patients or in the dose of individual drugsand, in addition, replacement with drugs with lessxerogenic effects may be effected. A number of drugsfor systemic use have been introduced, such as para-sympathomimetics, cholinesterase inhibitors, the bilestimulating agent anethole trithione, the mycolyticagents bromhexine and guafensin, the immune-enhancing substance interferon-a, the cytoprotectiveamifostine, and the antimalarial drug hydroxychloro-quine. In many cases, the clinical effects are question-able, and moreover some of these drugs are associatedwith serious side effects. The parasympathomimeticspilocarpine (Salagen) and cevimeline (Evoxac)stimulate the flow of saliva but may also cause nausea,sweating, gastrointestinal discomfort, respiratory dis-tress, urges to empty the bladder, and hypotension.Recent clinical trials using topical application of thecholinesterase physostigmine on the oral mucosa havedemonstrated local treatment of dry mouth as analternative approach to systemic treatment (Khosravani

et al. 2009). After diffusion of the drug through themucosal barrier, the underlying mucin-producingminor glands are stimulated to secrete saliva, while atthe same time the systemic effects are minimized. Thepatient suffering from dry mouth should maintainmeticulous oral hygiene, including the use of a fluoride-rich gel, frequent visits to the dental hygienist, and inaddition, avoiding food and beverages that are sweet,acidic, or carbonated.

22 Sialorrhea

Neuromuscular dysfunctions associated with cerebralpalsy, Parkinson disease, amyotrophic lateral scle-rosis, and stroke are examples of conditions thatcause drooling. Under these conditions, saliva poolsin the mouth owing to lack of swallowing rather thanto an increased rate of secretion of saliva (Younget al. 2011). An increase in the rate of secretion mayoccur in the treatment of Alzheimer disease andmyasthenia gravis owing to the medication withreversible cholinesterases (Freudenreich 2005; Eco-bichon 1995). Sialorrhea is reported as a side effectof clozapine in about one third of patients undertreatment for schizophrenia (Praharaj et al. 2010).Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug usedwhen traditional antipsychotics fail to treat schizo-phrenia. During the night, patients are troubled withchoking sensations and the aspiration of saliva. Thesituation may be so bothersome that the drug regi-men is discontinued. The phenomenon has beenlargely unexplained, and some authors have referredit to a weakened swallowing reflex. A number ofvarious categories of drugs have been suggested forthe treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation,usually with limited success and with side effects oftheir own (Sockalingam et al. 2007). Recent pre-clinical studies have shown that both clozapine andits main metabolite N-desmethylclozapine exertmixed actions on the salivation (Ekstrm et al.2010a, b; Godoy et al. 2011). Upon reflex secretion,the two drugs decrease the flow of saliva by antag-onistic actions on muscarinic M3 receptors and a1-adrenergic receptors. During sleep and at rest, anagonistic action by the drugs on muscarinic M1receptors maintains a low-grade, continuous flow ofsaliva.


23 Protein Components of HumanSaliva and PosttranslationalModifications

The recent availability of mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques applicable to the study of complexprotein mixtures has stimulated the effort to obtain aqualitative and quantitative comprehensive under-standing of the protein composition of saliva.

Indeed, MS techniques are capable of identifyingand quantifying thousands of protein components incomplex samples. The mass spectrometer makes itpossible to obtain precise mass values through themeasure of the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of the ionsgenerated from peptides and proteins at the source.Selected ions may also be submitted to a fragmenta-tion process (this technique is called MS/MS), and thedetermination of the m/z ratio of the fragments allowsthe peptide structure to be investigated. Thus, thepower of MS rests in the possibility to obtain infor-mation on not only the exact mass of a given peptide/protein, but also on its sequence. Two main strategiesmay be used to investigate protein mixtures: the top-down and the bottom-up approaches. In the bottom-upapproach, the nonfractionated sample is submitted todigestion, typically by trypsin, and the resultingdigestion mixture is fractionated and analyzed by MS.Thus, presence and quantification of the proteins inthe sample are inferred from the ensemble of identi-fied digestion peptides, supposing that any peptideidentified derives from a unique protein. Even thoughthis approach is of high throughput, the digestion step

introduces a limitation, since relevant naturallyoccurring cleavages may obviously not be disclosed.The top-down approach overcomes this problem,since peptide and protein separation followed by MSanalysis is performed with undigested samples.However, top-down platforms often cannot cover theentire proteome, because some proteins can escapefrom the analysis (e.g., proteins insoluble in acidicmilieu). High-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) is more suitable than gel electrophoresis as aseparation step technique for the analysis of the sali-vary proteome, since it is mainly represented bypeptides and small/medium-sized proteins. Moreover,with respect to gel electrophoresis, HPLC offers theadvantage that MS analysis can be performed online,i.e., peptides and proteins are submitted directly to theion source of the MS apparatus.

24 The Salivary Proteome

Most of the about 2,400 different proteins of wholesaliva characterized in recent years by proteomicstudies are not of glandular origin but probably orig-inate from exfoliating epithelial cells and oral micro-flora. Proteins of gland secretion origin should not bemore than 200300 in number, and they representmore than 85% by weight of the salivary proteome(Fig. 11). They belong to the following major fami-lies: a-amylases, carbonic anhydrase, histatins, muc-ins, proline-rich proteins (PRPs), further divided inacidic, basic, and basic glycosylated PRPs, statherin,PB peptide, and salivary-type (S-type) cystatins.

Fig. 11 Approximatepercentages (w/w) of thedifferent protein familiespresent in human adult wholesaliva, assuming a comparablecontribution of parotid andsubmandibular/sublingualglands. (Modified fromMessana et al. 2008b)


The function, origin, and encoding genes of themajor salivary proteins are reported in Table 1,together with the name of mature proteins and themain posttranslational modifications occurring before,during, and after secretion.

Histatins are a family of small peptides, the namereferring to the high number of histidine residues intheir structure. All the members of this familyarise from histatin 1 and histatin 3, which share verysimilar sequences and are encoded by two genes

Table 1 Families of major salivary proteins: function, origin, genes, name of mature proteins, and main posttranslationalmodifications (PTMs)

Family Function Origin Gene Mature proteins Other PTMs

a-Amylases Antibacterial,digestion, tissuecoating

Pr Sm/Sl

AMY1A a-Amylase 1 Disulfide bond,N-glycosylation,phosphorylation, proteolyticcleavages

Acidic PRPs Lubrication,mineralization,tissue coating

Pr Sm/Sl

PRH1,PRH2

Db-s, Pa, PIF-s, Pa 2-mer, Db-f,PIF-f, PRP-1, PRP-2, PRP-3,PRP-4, PC peptide

Disulfide bond, furtherproteolytic cleavages,phosphorylation, proteinnetwork

Basic PRPs Binding oftannins, tissuecoating

Pr PRB1,PRB2,PRB3,PRB4

II-1, II-2, CD-IIg, IB-1, IB-6,IB-7, IB-8a (Con1-/+), PD,PE, PF, PJ, PH, PRP Gl18, protein N1, salivary PRPPo

Disulfide bond (Gl 8),further proteolyticcleavages, N- andO-glycosylation,phosphorylation, proteinnetwork

GlycosylatedPRPs

Antiviral,lubrication

Carbonicanydrase VI

Buffering, taste Pr Sm CA6 Carbonic anhydrase 6 Disulfide bond,glycosylation

Cystatins Antibacterial,antiviral,mineralization,tissue coating

Pr Sm/Sl

CST1,CST2,CST3,CST4,CST5

Cystatin SN, cystatin SA,cystatin C, cystatin S, cystatin D

Disulfide bond,O-glycosylation,phosphorylation, sulfoxide,truncated forms

Histatins Antifungal,antibacterial,mineralization,wound-healing

Pr Sm/Sl

HTN1,HTN3

Histatin 1, histatin 2, histatin 3,histatin 5, histatin 6

Further proteolyticcleavages, phosphorylation,sulfation

Lactoferrin Antibacterial,antifungal,antiviral, innateimmune response

Allsalivaryglands

LTF Lactoferrin Disulfide bond,glycosylation,phosphorylation

Lysozyme Antibacterial Pr Sm LYZ Lysozyme C Disulfide bond

Mucins Antibacterial,antiviral,digestion,lubrication, tissuecoating

Allsalivaryglands

MUC5B,MUC19,MUC7

Mucin-5B, mucin-19, mucin-7 Disulfide bond, N- andO-glycosylation,phosphorylation

Peptide PB Not defined Pr Sm/Sl

SMR3B(PROL3)

Proline-rich peptide PB Proteolytic cleavages

Statherins Inhibits crystalformation,lubrication,mineralization,tissue coating

Pr Sm/Sl

STATH Statherin, statherin SV2 Phosphorylation, proteolyticcleavages, protein network

Modified from Castagnola et al. (2011b)PRP proline-rich protein, Pr parotid, Sm submandibular, Sl sublingual, GCF gingival crevicular fluid


(HTN1 and HTN3) located on chromosome band 4q13(Sabatini and Azen 1989). Statherin is an unusualtyrosine-rich 43-residue phosphorylated peptideinvolved in oral cavity calcium ion homeostasis andtooth mineralization (Schwartz et al. 1992). Its gene(STATH) is localized on chromosome band 4q13.3(Sabatini et al. 1987), near the histatin genes. UsuallyPB peptide is included in the basic PRP family.However, it is the product of PROL3 gene localizedon chromosome band 4q13.3, very close to thestatherin gene, and several characteristics of PBpeptide suggest a functional relationship with stath-erin (Inzitari et al. 2006). Cystatin S, SN, and SA aresalivary cystatins; they are inhibitors of cysteineproteinases and this property suggests its role in theprotection of the oral cavity from pathogens and inthe control of lysosomal cathepsins (Bobek andLevine 1992). Cystatin S1 and cystatin S2 correspondto monophosphorylated and diphosphorylated cystatinS, respectively. The loci expressing all the S-typecystatins (CST1CST5) are clustered on chromosomeband 20p11.21 together with the loci of cystatinsC and D. Whereas cystatin SA seems to be specifi-cally expressed in the oral cavity, cystatin S and SNhave also been detected in other bodily fluidsand organs, such as tears, urine, and seminal fluid(Dickinson 2002; Ryan et al. 2010). Human salivary

acidic PRPs consist of five principal isoforms codifiedby two distinct loci called PRH1 and PRH2 localizedon chromosome band12p13.2. They show acidiccharacter in the first 30 amino acid residues of theN-terminal region; the remaining part is basic and,similarly to basic PRPs, shows repeated sequencesrich in proline and glutamine. Basic and glycosylated(basic) PRPs are the most complex group of salivarypeptides, encoded by four different genes namedPRB1PRB4 clustered on chromosome band 12p13.2.Numerous homologous and unequal crossing-oversare present within the tandem repeats of the thirdexon, producing frequent length polymorphisms.

Salivary amylases consist of two families of iso-enzymes, called A and B, each family comprisingthree isoforms whose differences are connected todifferent posttranslational modifications (Scannapiecoet al. 1993).

Salivary mucins are divided in two distinct classes:the large gel-forming mucins (MG1) and the smallsoluble mucins (MG2). MG1 represents a heteroge-neous family of 20 9 10640 9 106 Da glycoproteinsexpressed by MUC5B, MUC4, and MUC19 genes(Offner and Troxler 2000; Thomsson et al. 2002).MG2, a much smaller mucin of 130180 kDa, is theproduct of the MUC7 gene mapped to chromosomebands 4q134q21 (Bobek et al. 1996). Mucins are

Fig. 12 The sequential proteolytic cleavage of histatin 3, which generates histatin 6 and histatin 5, before granule maturation, anda multitude of other fragments after granule secretion. (From data reported in Castagnola et al. 2004; Messana et al. 2008a)


composed of approximately 1520% protein and upto 80% carbohydrate, present largely in the form ofserine and threonine O-linked glycans (Strous andDekker 1992; Gendler and Spicer 1995). The poly-peptide backbone can be divided into three regions.The central region contains tandemly repeatedsequences of eight 169 amino acids. This domainserves as the attachment site for the O-glycans, andeach mucin has a unique, specific tandem-repeatsequence. Many mucins with monomeric molecularmasses greater than 29 106 Da form multimers morethan ten times bigger than that size.

25 Polymorphism of the SalivaryProteome

The human salivary proteome shows high interindi-vidual variability. The different isoforms of salivaryproteins may be genetic in origin (different allelescodifying acidic PRPs, basic PRPs, mucins, cystatins;differential splicing), but may also derive from severalposttranslational modifications which occur duringthe trafficking of the proteins through the secretorypathway and after secretion.

One of the better known examples of polymor-phism and modifications occurring before, during, andafter secretion concerns acidic PRPs. The two lociwhich encode acidic PRPs have different alleles. ThePRH2 locus is biallelic, and the expression productsare PRP-1 and PRP-2. There are three alleles of thePRH1 locus and they express Pif-s (parotid isoelec-tric-focusing variant, slow), Db-s (double band, slow),and Pa (parotid acidic protein) proteins (Inzitari et al.2005). All the isoforms are N-terminally modified(pyroglutamic moiety) and are subjected to phos-phorylation before granule storage. The major deriv-atives are diphosphorylated, but low levels ofmonophosphorylated and triphosphorylated forms arealso detected in saliva. Another important modifica-tion is the cleavage. Before granule storage PRP-1,PRP-2, Pif-s, and Db-s are in part cleaved at theArg-106 residue by a specific enzyme of the conver-tase family. Cleavage generates four truncatedderivatives, called PRP-3, PRP-4, Pif-f, and Db-f, anda common C-terminal peptide of 44 amino acids,called PC peptide (Messana et al. 2008a). The Paisoform is not cleaved, since the Arg-106 ? Cyssubstitution eliminates the consensus sequence

recognized by the proteinase. However, the cysteineresidue generates a disulfide bridge and only the Padimeric form may be detected in whole saliva.

Also histatins, statherin, PB peptide, and princi-pally basic PRPs undergo proteolytic cleavage beforegranule storage and during secretion, but the entireforms of basic PRPs, differently from the other salivaryproteins, are not detected in saliva (Messana et al.2008a). Following proteolytic cleavage, many salivarypeptides are also subjected to the removal of C-terminalresidues by the action of specific carboxypeptidases,and this modification is considered an event common toall the secretory processes (Steiner 1998). An importantexample concerns the formation of histatin 5 fromhistatin 6. The two histatins derive from the parentpeptide of 32 amino acid residues called histatin 3.Histatin 3, from the presence of the RGYR; convertaseconsensus sequence recognized by an unknown, butspecific, proteinase acting before granule storage, gen-erates histatin 6 (histatin 3 fr 1/25). Subsequently, anunknown carboxypeptidase removes the C-terminalarginine residue, generating histatin 5 (histatin 3 fr1/24). Sequentially, histatins 5 and 6 are subjected tofurther proteolytic cleavages after granule secretion asshown in Fig. 12 (Castagnola et al. 2004; Messana et al.2008a).

Before granule storage salivary proteins are alsosubjected to phosphorylation, glycosylation, and sul-fation. MG1, MG2, glycosylated PRPs, and amylaseare salivary glycosylated proteins (Ramachandranet al. 2006). The glycomoiety may be N- and/orO-linked and the sugars show the same architecturesdemonstrated for other glycoproteins (Guile et al.1998). In the same way, the tyrosylprotein sulfo-transferase involved in the polysulfation of histatin 1seems to be the same enzyme acting in other tissues(Cabras et al. 2007).

The salivary proteome changes dynamically alsoafter secretion under the action of endogenous andexogenous enzymes, the latter derived from micro-organisms resident in the oral cavity. For instance,it has been demonstrated that a glutamine endopro-teinase localized in dental plaquelikely of microbialorigingenerates in the oral cavity a lot of smallfragments (from seven to 20 amino acid residues)from different basic PRPs (Helmerhorst et al. 2008).Another important modification occurring in theoral cavity is the formation of cross-linked deriva-tives of salivary proteins, generating a protective


proteinaceous network on tooth surfaces (enamelpellicle) and oral mucosa. This protein film isimportant for the integrity of tooth enamel, because itacts as a boundary lubricant on the enamel surface(Douglas et al. 1991). Moreover, interactions betweenpellicle proteins and bacterial surfaces are responsiblefor specificity of the bacterial colonization during theearliest stage of plaque formation (Gibbons and Hay1988). This protein network could also interact withthe oral epithelial cell plasma membrane and itsassociate cytoskeleton and might contribute to themucosal epithelial flexibility and turnover. Histatins,statherin, and acidic PRPs are among the proteinsinvolved. It has been indeed demonstrated that acidicPRPs, statherin, and the major histatins are substratesof oral transglutaminase 2 and they participate incross-linking reactions (Yao et al. 1999).

26 Physiological Variability

The composition of oral fluid varies depending onvarious factors. It has already been reported that thecontribution of the different salivary glands to wholesaliva in resting and stimulated conditions is different,and parotid saliva is the prevalent contributor tostimulated saliva. It has been also demonstrated that

the protein composition of mixed submandibular/sublingual saliva is different from that of parotidsaliva (Table 2). For instance, the levels of acidicPRPs, histatin 1, and a-amylases are higher in parotidsaliva than in submandibular/sublingual saliva.Conversely, S-type cystatins are more concentrated insubmandibular/sublingual saliva. Furthermore, thesecretion of some peptides is gland-specific: basicPRPs are secreted only by the parotid glands. Finally,among the other proteins detected in whole saliva,a-defensins 14 and b-thymosins 4 and 10 originatemainly from gingival crevicular fluid (Pisano et al.2005).

As a consequence, the salivary output is charac-terized by variations not only of the flow rate but alsoof the protein concentration and composition.

Age is another important factor affecting proteinsaliva composition. A recent study performed onhuman preterm newborns demonstrated the profounddifference in the protein composition of their salivawith respect to that of adults (Castagnola et al. 2011a).Indeed, in saliva from preterm human newborns, morethan 40 protein masses usually undetected in adultsaliva were revealed. Among them, stefin A and stefin B(three isoforms), S100A7 (two isoforms), S100A8,S100A9 (eight isoforms), S100A11, S100A12, smallPRP-3 (two isoforms), lysozyme C, thymosins b4 and

Table 2 Different contributions to salivary peptides and proteins

Peptide or family Parotid glands Sm/Sl glands Plasma exudate GCF

Acidic PRP (all the isoforms) dddd ddd

Basic PRP dddd

Basic glycosylated PRP ddd

Histatin 3 dddd ddd

Histatin 1 ddd ddd

Statherin dddd dddd d

PB peptide dd dddd d

S-type cystatins d dddd

Amylase dddd d

MG1 dddd

MG2 ddd

Albumin (HSA) dd dd

Thymosins b4 and b10 ? dd

a-Defensins 14 d dd

Modified from Messana et al. (2008b)GCF gingival crevicular fluid, HSA human serum albumin, Four circles high contribution, three circles medium contribution, twocircles low contribution, one circle very low contribution, question mark unknown


b10, antileukoproteinase, histone H1c, and a- andb-globins were identified. The salivary concentrationof these proteins decreased as a function of postcon-ceptional age, reaching the values observed in full-termnewborns at about 270 days of postconceptional age,and the values observed in adult whole saliva later indevelopment. Interestingly, the shape of decrease formany proteins was different, suggesting that the vari-ations were connected to coordinate and hierarchicalactions of these proteins. Many of the identified pro-teins are candidates as tumor markers in the adult. Thisobservation led to the suggestion that during fetaldevelopment, the interplay between these proteinscontributes to the molecular events that regulate cellgrowth and death. A preliminary study showed thatsalivary glands are responsible for the high levels oforal thymosin b4 detected in preterm newborn saliva,whereas in adult saliva this peptide is primarily derivedfrom crevicular fluid (Inzitari et al. 2009; Nemolatoet al. 2009). These studies suggest that salivary glandsswitch their secretion to adult salivary proteins onlyafter the normal term of delivery.

Whereas basic PRPs in whole saliva do not reachtheir mature concentrations until the age of adoles-cence (Cabras et al. 2009), other proteins show maturelevels as early as an age of 3 years or show variableconcentrations as a function of age, i.e., acidic PRPs,histatin 5, histatin 6, histatin 1, and cystatin S. Forinstance, acidic PRPs show a minimum of concen-tration around 69 years of age, probably in connec-tion with events occurring in the mouth during thereplacement of the deciduous dentition. A processcalled exfoliation might cause a decrease in theconcentration of specific salivary protein and peptides,owing to their recruitment to dental and gingival sur-faces. The higher concentration of histatin 1 around35-years of age is of particular interest, since it maybe associated with its recently demonstrated wound-closing properties (Oudhoff et al. 2008).

27 Function of Salivary Proteins

No doubt exists about the fundamental role of salivaand its protein content in the protection of oralmucosa and teeth. It is enough to consider thedevastating macroscopic effects detectable in theoral cavity of patients affected by severe Sjgrensyndrome. The mucosal epithelium is subjected to

wounds and infections. The dental arc is compro-mised by recurrent periodontitis and caries. It is,however, very difficult to establish, at the molecularlevel, not only the specific role played by each sali-vary protein in oral protection but also the interactionsbetween the different salivary proteins in theirprotection of the mouth and, since saliva is swal-lowed, of the entire digestive tract. Some roles seemevident, such as the lubricating and protecting role ofmucins, and the buffering properties of carbonicanhydrase, as reported in Table 1. The high concen-tration of salivary amylase is traditionally associatedwith starch predigestion. However, owing to the lowenzymatic activity of the enzyme, some researchersare convinced that oral amylase plays a presently notspecified role in the protection of the mouth.

The information obtained by recent proteomicstudies are a clue and a stimulus for the understandingof the roles of the different families of salivary pro-teins in the oral cavity. For instance, it is challengingto decipher the significant qualitative and quantitativedifferences in gland secretions, which suggest specificmolecular requirements for different oral districts.Other suggestions could emerge from the variationsobserved in protein composition during the pediatricage which could offer valuable information on pos-sible functions. Except for their tannin-bindingproperties (Lu and Bennick 1998), the function ofbasic PRPs is still almost completely obscure. Recentstudies demonstrated that an unidentified componentof the basic PRP family displays antiviral activityagainst HIV (Robinovitch et al. 2001), and a peptidefragment of ten amino acid residues considerablyinhibits Propionibacterium acnes growth (Huanget al. 2008), revealing interesting antiviral propertiesfor peptide fragments related to basic PRPs.

Acidic PRPs are responsible for the modulation ofthe salivary calcium ion concentration and areinvolved in the formation of acquired enamel pellicleand oral mucosal pellicle, networks originating fromcross-linking of the proteins caused by the action oftransglutaminase 2. However, no information isavailable on the functional differences exerted by theentire and truncated isoforms or on the possible roleof PC peptide, the C-terminal peptide deriving fromthe cleavage of all the isoforms of acidic PRPs.

Most salivary peptides and proteins are directly orindirectly involved in innate immunity and in themodulation of the oral microflora (Gorr 2009). In this


respect, the antifungal activity shown by histatin 3and its fragments on Candida albicans species isparticularly interesting. Recently, it was demonstratedthat histatin 3 binds to heat shock cognate protein 70(HSC70) during the G1/S transition in human gingivalfibroblasts (Imamura et al. 2009); it prevents ATP-dependent dissociation of the HSC70p27 complex,and it induces DNA synthesis. These findings suggestthat histatin 3 may also be involved in oral cellproliferation.

Recently, it was shown that histatin 1 displayswound-healing activity (Oudhoff et al. 2008). Inter-estingly, histatin 1 induced cell spreading andmigration in a full-skin human wound model; how-ever, the peptide did not stimulate cell proliferation.N- to C-cyclization potentiated peptide activity 1,000-fold, indicating that a specific peptide conformationwas responsible for the effect (Oudhoff et al. 2009a).The minimally active domain was found to be frag-ment 2032 of the parent histatin peptide. Thewound-healing effect was strongly inhibited bymucin-5B, probably by blocking reepithelialization.Interestingly, histatin 1 stimulated wound closure ofprimary cells of both oral and nonoral origin (Oudhoffet al. 2009b), which suggests a therapeutic applicationof histatin 1 derived peptides in the treatment of skinwounds.

Statherin is a singular salivary phosphopeptide of43 amino acid residues involved in the inhibition ofcalcium phosphate precipitation and in the formationof acquired enamel pellicle (Schpbach et al. 2001).However, statherin may have other relevant oralfunctions implicated in the formation of the oralepithelial protein pellicle, and it probably has afunctional connection with the PB peptide, whosefunction is still completely obscure (Messana et al.2008b).

28 Pathological Modifications

Saliva is a very attractive bodily fluid for the diag-nosis of diseases for several reasons: (1) collection ofsaliva is usually economical, safe, easy, and canbe performed without the help of health care workers,allowing home-based sampling; (2) collection ofsaliva is considered an acceptable and noninvasiveprocess by patients because it does not provoke anypain (and so saliva can be easily collected for patients

in the pediatric age range) (Tabak 2001). Nowadays,saliva is used effectively for the detection of specificantibodies (i.e., HIV, hepatitis C), hormones, andpharmaceuticals (i.e., drugs of abuse). However, thewidespread use of saliva for diagnostics is compli-cated by the above-reported dynamism and poly-morphism that characterizes the salivary proteome.The present and future analytical ability of proteomictechniques to contemporaneously quantify the greatvariety of possible translational salivary states willinevitably lead to defining individual salivary pro-files. The challenges are to establish the differencesbetween particular polymorphisms or posttransla-tional modifications connected with diseases andfurther, to determine whether these differences inhibitor promote the development of specific diseases.

The salivary proteome presents several uniqueproteins; thus saliva-based diagnostics may provideinformation complementary to that from blood- andurine-based diagnostics. Since about one quarter ofthe salivary proteome overlaps with the plasma pro-teome (Loo et al. 2010), it will be important toestablish if disease-linked plasma modifications arereflected in the saliva secreted in order to rely uponnoninvasive tests for disease screening, detection, andmonitoring.

Indeed, several studies have shown that systemicdiseases may affect the human salivary proteome. Thesalivary biomarkers characterized so far show satis-factory clinical sensitivity and specificity (i.e., goodprediction of the patients with the disease and normalvalues in healthy subjects). An interesting exampleconcerns the detection of low phosphorylation levelsof three salivary peptides (statherin, histatin 1, acidicPRPs) in a subset (about 60%) of patients with autismspectrum disorder (Castagnola et al. 2008). A set ofsalivary proteins has been shown to display a differentconcentration in children affected by type 1 diabetescompared with healthy subjects (Cabras et al. 2010),i.e., a significant increase of amounts of the shortform of S100A9, a-defensins 13, and various frag-ments deriving from PC peptide paralleled by adecrease of the amounts of PC peptide, statherin,PB peptide, and histatins 3, 5, and 6.

Many studies have addressed the early detection ofdifferent oral tumors such as oral squamous cell car-cinoma (Jou et al. 2010; Shintani et al. 2010; Hu et al.2008) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(Dowling et al. 2008; Ohshiro et al. 2007; de Jong


et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2002). Because the researchgroups used different proteomic platforms, it is notsurprising that the results may differ. Jou et al. (2010),using 2D electrophoresis followed by matrix-assistedlaser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight(TOF) MS, found the level of salivary transferrin tobe increased in patients with oral squamous cell car-cinoma. Shintani et al. (2010), using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization TOF analyses,showed an increase in the level of a truncated form ofcystatin SN. Hu et al. (2008), using both liquidchromatographyMS/MS and 2D electrophoresis,found increased amounts of protectin, catalase, pro-filin, and S100A9 for oral squamous cell carcinoma.The salivary proteome of patients affected by primarySjgren syndrome has also been extensively investi-gated (Giusti et al. 2007; Ryu et al. 2006; Peluso et al.2007; Fleissig et al. 2009). The principal platformutilized was based on 2D electrophoresis followedeither by MALDI-TOF MS or by electrospray ioni-zation MS/MS analyses of the tryptic protein digests.Some controversial results were, however, obtained.For instance, whereas Giusti et al. (2007) found thelevel of salivary a-amylase decreased, Fleissig et al.(2009) found it increased, suggesting that the searchof new biomarkers has to be performed in a largenumber of patients and validation of most of theresults reported is necessary.

Even though it is a demanding task, for widespreadintroduction of saliva-based diagnostics it is manda-tory to define proper reference proteomes and further,to standardize analytical procedures. As for bloodand urine samples, the time and site of specimencollection, as well as the definition of specific treat-ments for sample stabilization, need to be established.Thus, high-throughput proteomic approaches, appliedunder standardized conditions, will result in theintroduction of simple, sensitive, and specific ana-lytical procedures to demonstrate salivary biomarkersin clinical practice.

References

Atkinson JC, Shiroky JB, Macynski A, Fox PC (1989) Effectsof furosemide on the oral cavity. Gerodontology 8:2326

Bobek LA, Levine MJ (1992) Cystatinsinhibitors of cysteineproteinases. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 3:307332

Bobek LA, Liu J, Sait SN, Shows TB, Bobek YA, Levine MJ(1996) Structure and chromosomal localization of thehuman salivary mucin gene, MUC7. Genomics 31:277282

Babkin BP (1950) Secretory mechanism of the digestiveglands, 2nd edn. Hoeber, New York

Barka T (1965) Induced cell proliferation: the effect ofisoproterenol. Exp Cell Res 37:662679

Birkhed D, Heintze U (1989) Salivary secretion rate, buffercapacity, and pH. In: Tenovuo J (ed) Human saliva. Clinicalchemistry and microbiology, vol 11. CRC, Boca Raton

Blair-West JR, Coghlan JP, Denton DA, Wright RDI (1967)Alimentary canal II. In: Code CF (ed) Handbook ofphysiology, 6th edn. American Physiological Society,Bethesda

Borg-Andersson A, Ekstrm J, Birkhed D (1992) Glucose inhuman parotid saliva in response to cold stress. Acta PhysiolScand 146:283284

Brandtzaeg P (2009) Mucosal immunity: induction, dissemina-tion and effector functions. Scand J Immunol 70:505515

Cabras T, Fanali C, Monteiro JA, Amado F, Inzitari R,Desiderio C, Scarano E, Giardina B, Castagnola M,Messana I (2007) Tyrosine polysulfation of human salivaryhistatin 1. A post-translational modification specific of thesubmandibular gland. J Proteome Res 6:24722480

Cabras T, Pisano E, Boi R, Olianas A, Manconi B, Inzitari R,Fanali C, Giardina B, Castagnola M, Messana I (2009) Age-dependent modifications of the human salivary secretoryprotein complex. J Proteome Res 8:41264134

Cabras T, Pisano E, Mastinu A, Denotti G, Pusceddu PP,Inzitari R, Fanali C, Nemolato S, Castagnola M, Messana I(2010) Alterations of the salivary secretory peptidomeprofile in children affected by type 1 diabetes. Mol CellProteomics 9:20992108

Cannon WB (1937) Digestion and health. Secker and Warburg,London

Castagnola M, Inzitari R, Rossetti DV, Olmi C, Cabras T,Piras V, Nicolussi P, Sanna MT, Pellegrini M, Giardina B,Messana I (2004) A cascade of 24 histatins (histatin 3fragments) in human saliva. Suggestions for a pre-secretorysequential cleavage pathway. J Biol Chem 279:4143641443

Castagnola M, Messana I, Inzitari R, Fanali C, Cabras T,Morelli A, Pecoraro AM, Neri G, Torrioli MG, Gurrieri F(2008) Hypo-phosphorylation of salivary peptidome as aclue to the molecular pathogenesis of autism spectrumdisorders. J Proteome Res 7:53275332

Castagnola M, Inzitari R, Fanali C, Iavarone F, Vitali A,Desiderio C, Vento G, Tirone C, Romagnoli C, Cabras T,Manconi B, Sanna MT, Boi R, Pisano E, Olianas A,Pellegrini M, Nemolato S, Heizmann CW, Faa G, Messana I(2011a) The surprising composition of the salivary prote-ome of preterm human newborn. Mol Cell Proteomics10:M110.003467

Castagnola M, Cabras T, Vitali A, Sanna MT, Messana I(2011b) Biotechnological implication of the salivary prote-ome. Trends Biotechnol 29:409418

evik-Aras H, Ekstrm J (2006) Cholecystokinin- and gastrin-induced protein and amylase secretion from the parotidgland of the anaesthetized rat. Reg Pept 134:8996


evik-Aras H, Ekstrm J (2008) Melatonin-evoked in vivosecretion of protein and amylase from the parotid gland ofthe anaesthetized rat. J Pineal Res 45:413421

evik-Aras H, Ekstrm J (2010) Anti-inflammatory action ofcholecystokinin and melatonin in the rat parotid gland. OralDis 16:661667

evik-Aras H, Godoy T, Ekstrm J (2011) Melatonin-inducedprotein synthesis in the rat parotid gland. J Physiol Phar-macol 62:9599

Chen YC, Li TY, Tsai MF (2002) Analysis of the saliva frompatients with oral cancer by matrix-assisted laser deso-rption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. RapidCommun Mass Spectrom 16:364369

Cutando A, Gmez-Moreno G, Arana C, Acua-Castroviejo D,Reiter RJ (2007) Melatonin: potential functions in the oralcavity. J Periodontol 78:10941194

Dawes C (1975) Circadian rhythms in the flow rate andcomposition of unstimulated and stimulated human sub-mandibular saliva. J Physiol 244:535548

Dawes C (1987) Physiological factors affecting salivary flowrate, oral sugar clearance, and the sensation of dry mouth.J Dent Res 66:648

Saliva and Its Scretion

Documents

Transcript of Saliva and Its Scretion