RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

38
RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update School College Work Initiative Chairs Meeting November 7, 2013 1

description

RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update. School College Work Initiative Chairs Meeting November 7, 2013. Introductory Remarks. Dual Credit Student Data Report 2012-13. Participation. Student participation increased by 16 % over 2011-12 (15,961 students to 18,584 students) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Page 1: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

1

RPT Chairs’ MeetingMinistry Update

School College Work Initiative Chairs MeetingNovember 7, 2013

Page 2: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Introductory Remarks

2

Page 3: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Dual Credit Student Data Report 2012-13

3

Page 4: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Participation• Student participation increased by 16

% over 2011-12 (15,961 students to 18,584 students)

• Number of programs increased by 11%• In 2012-13, approved vs actual student

participants was 93% as compared to 80% in the previous year

4

Page 5: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Success Rates

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130

102030405060708090

100

79 80 80 8186

Percentage of Dual Credits Attempted vs. Achieved

5

Page 6: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Retention Rates

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130

102030405060708090

10084 85 85 86 87

Percentage of Students Who Started vs. Finished

6

Page 7: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Target Group Participation by Program Focus

18,584 dual credit students provincially• 13,769 in the primary target group (74%)• 3,560 SHSM students (19%)• 1,255 OYAP students (7%)

7

Page 8: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2012-13 Retention by Target Group

Target Group Number of Students

Retention Rate

Primary Target Group 13,769 86%

SHSM 3,560 91%OYAP 1,255 90%Provincial 18,584 87%

8RPT Data

Page 9: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2012-13 Success by Target Group

Target Group Number of Students

Success Rate

Primary Target Group 13,769 86%

SHSM 3,560 90%OYAP 1,255 86%Provincial 18,584 86%

9RPT Data

Page 10: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2012-13 Approved vs Actual by Target Group

Target Group Number of Students

Approved vs. Actual

Primary Target Group 13,769 93%

SHSM 3,560 87%OYAP 1,255 83%Provincial 18,584 93%

10RPT Data

Page 11: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Provincial Dual Credit Footprint 2012-13 (RPT Data)

11

Dual Credits Students

Grade 11 and 12 Students= xx%

18,584

389,252*= 4.8%

* 2011-12 grade 11 and grade 12 enrolment (source: OnSIS)

Page 12: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Provincial Student Participation in Pathway ProgramsProgram %

Dual Credit (grades 11 and 12 students; OnSIS Data) 2.8%SHSM (grades 11 and 12 students; OnSIS Data) 9.1%Co-op (grades 9-12 students; OnSIS data) 11.9%OYAP Participation (grades 11 and 12 students; EOIS-APPR data) 5.0%OYAP Registration (grades 11 and 12 students; EOIS-APPR data) 1.3%

12

Page 13: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Students who Earned an OSSD 2011-12 (OnSIS Data)

• 6,026 students who earned a dual credit (as reported to OnSIS) earned their OSSD in 2011-12

• 56% of dual credit students (OnSIS data)

13

Page 14: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Number of dual credit students who have applied to go to college

(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)

2009-10 Dual Credit Students

2010-11 Dual Credit Students

Total Students in Dual Credits 7,570 12,202

College Applicants – One Year After 1,473 19% 2,458 21%

College Applicants -- Two Years After 2,347 31% --

14

Page 15: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Number of dual credit students who have registered for college

(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)

2009-10 Dual Credit Students

2010-11 Dual Credit Students

Total Students in Dual Credits 7,570 12,202

College Registrants – One Year After 1050 14% 1842 15%

College Registrants -- Two Years After 1852 24% --

15

Page 16: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

College Conversion Rates (2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)

2009-10 Dual Credit

Students

2011-12 Dual Credit

StudentsOne Year After 71% 73%

Two Years After 79% --

16

Page 17: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

“Did they stay or did they go?”

DC Students Registered

2009-10 Dual Credit Students

2010-11 Dual Credit Students

One Year After

Two Years After

One Year After

at same college where taken dual credit

555 908 950

at different college than where taken dual credit

353 670 59317

Page 18: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Number of dual credit students who have applied to university

(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)

2009-10 Dual Credit Students

2010-11 Dual Credit Students

Total Students in Dual Credits

7,570 12,202

University Applicants – One Year After 171 2% 291 2%

University Applicants -- Two Years After 404 5% --

18

Page 19: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

School Within a College Participant Survey

19

Page 20: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Objectives of the Survey• To assess how SWAC programs help

students have a relevant and engaging high school experience

• To assess how SWAC programs help students explore and prepare for the post-secondary pathway of their choice

20

Page 21: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

School Within a College (SWAC)• 2010-11: 1,500 students• 2011-12: 2,050 students• 2012-13: 3,048 students• 49% increase in the number of

SWAC students over last year

21

Page 22: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

SWAC Survey Participants• Survey sent to 3,048 SWAC

students • Responses from 513 students

(approximately 17% - same as previous year)

22

Page 23: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

SWAC Survey Participant Profile• 65% of students are 18 or under• 45% were working while taking the

program (consistent with the previous year)

• 98% of respondents took at least one dual credit

23

Page 24: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

SWAC Survey Participant Profile

24One Semester One School Year More than One School

Year

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

35

15

5052

32

17

45

20

35

44

2432

Duration of absence by percent of those who were early school leavers

2009-10 (n=46)

2010-11 (n=123)

2011-12 (n=137)

2012-13 (n=151)

Page 25: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

% of SWAC Survey Participants Who Were Early School Leavers

2012-13(n=507)

2011-12(n=355)

2010-11(n=433)

2009-10(n=94)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

29%

39%

28%

26%

25

Page 26: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Who Referred Students to SWAC?

26Guid

ance

Cou

nsell

or

Studen

t Suc

cess

Team

Friend

Princip

al/VP

Subjec

t Tea

cher

Other

Family

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2009-10(n=88)

2010-11(n=427)

2011-12(n=332)

2012-13(n=492)

Page 27: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Reasons for Enrolling in SWAC

Learn more about career options

Learn more about college program options

Learn in a more adult setting

More freedom

Change in learning environment

Get remaining credits to complete OSSD

33%

36%

46%

48%

63%

69%

27Note: Same top 6 reasons chosen since 2009

Page 28: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

28

How Did The SWAC Program Help?I usually get along well with my teachers (n=398)

I am seriously considering applying for college (n=349)

I usually have a good understanding of my courses (n=343)

I usually get along well with my peers (n=338)

I developed more realistic expectations about the academic challenges of PSE (n=327)

I am more confident about my ability (n=325)

79%

70%

68%

67%

65%

65%

Page 29: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Destinations after Completing High School

Other

Apprenticeship

University

Continue high school

Work

College

7%

12%

13%

18%

42%

70%

Students could select more than one option (n=494)

Page 30: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

SWAC Survey Conclusions• As a result of the SWAC program, students

felt more confident in their academic abilities• Students perceptions of school, as well as

their future career and educational plans, have changed significantly

• The majority of participants with post-secondary plans declared that SWAC had a positive influence on their decision

• SWAC is being used as a re-engagement strategy

30

Page 31: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Summer SWAC• The program requirements:

– 1 dual credit + 1 Ontario curriculum credit– Dual credit teacher– On campus

• The results:– 211 students approved (85% of seats filled)– 10 programs– 87 % retention rate– 90 % success rate for Dual Credits 31

Page 32: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Summer Single Dual Credits

• The program requirements:– 1 dual credit – Dual credit teacher– On campus

• The results:– 302 students approved (66% of seats filled)– 17 programs– 89 % retention rate– 91 % success rate for Dual Credits

32

Page 33: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

Improvements to EDCS Website

• Requested columns• Note boxes in transportation• Approach by program in extracts

33

Page 34: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2013-14 Overview

34

Page 35: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2013-14 Overview• Focus

– Data-based decision making– Continue work with TCU around

apprenticeship dual credits– Focus on program quality

35

Page 36: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

2013-14• Pathways to Apprenticeship Fact Sheets

– Students must have a Registered Training Agreement to get TCU seat purchase

– TCU will provide seat purchase funding if there is a sufficient number of suitable students and the TDA college has the capacity to deliver

– SCWI seat purchase is only for Primary Target Group student

36

Page 37: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

EDU Website

• Documents can be found on the Ministry of Education Website

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/studentsuccess/strategy.html

37

Page 38: RPT Chairs’ Meeting Ministry Update

38

Thanks et Merci