Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

download Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

of 21

Transcript of Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    1/21

    Bob StretchSouthwestern College

    Robbins & Judge

    Organizational Behavior13th Edition

    Basic Approaches to Leadership

    12-0 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    2/21

    Chapter Learning Objectives

    After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

    Define leadership and contrast leadership and management.

    Summarize the conclusions of trait theories.

    Identify the central tenets and main limitations of behavioral

    theories.

    Assess contingency theories of leadership by their level of support. Contrast the interactive theories (path-goal and leader-member

    exchange).

    Identify the situational variables in the leader-participation model.

    Show how U.S. managers might need to adjust their leadership

    approaches in Brazil, France, Egypt, and China.

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-1

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    3/21

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    4/21

    Trait Theories of Leadership

    Theories that consider personality, social, physical, orintellectual traits to differentiate leaders from

    nonleaders

    Not very useful until matched with the Big Five

    Personality Framework

    Leadership Traits

    Extroversion

    Conscientiousness

    Openness

    Emotional Intelligence (Qualified)

    Traits can predict leadership, but they are better at

    predicting leader emergence than effectiveness.

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-3

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    5/21

    Behavioral Theories of Leadership

    Theories proposing that specific behaviors differentiateleaders from nonleaders

    Differences between theories of leadership:

    Trait theory: leadership is inherent, so we must identify the

    leader based on his or her traits

    Behavioral theory: leadership is a skill set and can be taught

    to anyone, so we must identify the proper behaviors to teach

    potential leaders

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-4

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    6/21

    Important Behavioral Studies

    Ohio State University Found two key dimensions of leader behavior:

    Initiating structurethe defining and structuring of roles

    Considerationjob relationships that reflect trust and respect

    Both are important

    University of Michigan

    Also found two key dimensions of leader behavior:

    Employee-orientedemphasizes interpersonal relationships

    and is the most powerful dimension

    Production-orientedemphasizes the technical aspects of thejob

    The dimensions of the two studies are very similar

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-5

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    7/21

    Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid

    Draws on both studies toassess leadership style

    Concern for People is

    Consideration and

    Employee-Orientation

    Concern for Production

    is Initiating Structure and

    Production-Orientation

    Style is determined by

    position on the graph

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-6

    E X H I B I T 12-1

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    8/21

    Contingency Theories

    While trait and behavior theories do help usunderstand leadership, an important component is

    missing: the environment in which the leader exists

    Contingency Theory deals with this additional aspect of

    leadership effectiveness studies

    Three key theories:

    Fielders Model

    Hersey and Blanchards Situational Leadership Theory Path-Goal Theory

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-7

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    9/21

    Fiedler Model

    Effective group performance depends on the propermatch between leadership style and the situation

    Assumes that leadership style (based on orientation revealed

    in LPC questionnaire) is fixed

    Considers Three Situational Factors:

    Leader-member relations: degree of confidence and trust in

    the leader

    Task structure: degree of structure in the jobs

    Position power: leaders ability to hire, fire, and reward

    For effective leadership: must change to a leader who fi ts

    the situation or change the situational variables to fi t the

    current leader

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-8

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    10/21

    Graphic Representation of Fiedlers Model

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-9

    E X H I B I T 12-2

    Used to

    determine

    which type

    of leader

    to use in a

    given

    situation

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    11/21

    Assessment of Fiedlers Model

    Positives: Considerable evidence supports the model, especially if the

    original eight situations are grouped into three

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-10

    Problems:

    The logic behind the LPC

    scale is not well understood

    LPC scores are not stable

    Contingency variables are

    complex and hard todetermine

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    12/21

    Fiedlers Cognitive Resource Theory

    A refinement of Fiedlers original model: Focuses on stress as the enemy of rationality and creator of

    unfavorable conditions

    A leaders intelligence and experience influence his or her

    reaction to that stress

    Research is supporting the theory.

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-11

    Stress Level

    Low

    High

    IntellectualAbilities

    Effective

    Ineffective

    Leaders

    Experience

    Ineffective

    Effective

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    13/21

    Hersey & Blanchards Situational Leadership

    A model that focuses on follower readiness

    Followers can accept or reject the leader

    Effectiveness depends on the followers response to the

    leaders actions

    Readiness is the extent to which people have the ability

    and willingnessto accomplish a specific task

    A paternal model:

    As the child matures, the adult releases more and more

    control over the situation

    As the workers become more ready, the leader becomes

    more laissez-faire

    An intuitive model that does not get much support

    from the research findings

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-12

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    14/21

    Houses Path-Goal Theory

    Builds from the Ohio State studies and the expectancytheory of motivation

    The Theory:

    Leaders provide followers with information, support, andresources to help them achieve their goals

    Leaders help clarify the path to the workers goals Leaders can display multiple leadership types

    Four types of leaders:

    Directive: focuses on the work to be done

    Supportive: focuses on the well-being of the worker Participative: consults with employees in decision-making

    Achievement-Oriented: sets challenging goals

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-13

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    15/21

    Path-Goal Model

    Two classes of contingency variables:

    Environmental are outside of employee control

    Subordinate factors are internal to employee

    Mixed support in the research findings

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-14

    E X H I B I T 12-4

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    16/21

    Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory

    A response to the failing of contingency theories to

    account for followers and heterogeneous leadership

    approaches to individual workers

    LMX Premise:

    Because of time pressures, leaders form a special

    relationship with a small group of followers: the in-group

    This in-group is trusted and gets more time and attention

    from the leader (more exchanges)

    All other followers are in the out-group and get less of the

    leaders attention and tend to have formal relationships withthe leader (fewer exchanges)

    Leaders pick group members early in the relationship

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-15

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    17/21

    LMX Model

    How groups are assigned is unclear

    Follower characteristics determine group membership

    Leaders control by keeping favorites close

    Research has been generally supportive

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-16

    E X H I B I T 12-3

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    18/21

    Yroom and Yettons Leader-Participation Model

    Howa leader makes decisions is as important as whatis

    decided

    Premise:

    Leader behaviors must adjust to reflect task structure

    Normative model: tells leaders how participative to be intheir decision-making of a decision tree

    Five leadership styles

    Twelve contingency variables

    Research testing for both original and modified modelshas not been encouraging

    Model is overly complex

    2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 12-17

    E X H I B I T 12-5

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    19/21

    Global Implications

    These leadership theories are primarily studied in

    English-speaking countries

    GLOBE does have some country-specific insights

    Brazilian teams prefer leaders who are high in consideration,

    participative, and have high LPC scores

    French workers want a leader who is high on initiating

    structure and task-oriented

    Egyptian employees value team-oriented, participative

    leadership, while keeping a high-power distance

    Chinese workers may favor a moderately participative style

    Leaders should take culture into account

    12-18 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    20/21

    Summary and Managerial Implications

    Leadership is central to understanding group behavior

    as the leader provides the direction

    Extroversion, conscientiousness, and openness all show

    consistent relationships to leadership

    Behavioral approaches have narrowed leadership down

    into two usable dimensions

    Need to take into account the situational variables,especially the impact of followers

    12-19 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/13/2019 Robbins Ob13 Ins Ppt12

    21/21

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any

    means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the

    United States of America.

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall