RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES” (FIN - 10)
-
Upload
noah-rutledge -
Category
Documents
-
view
18 -
download
0
description
Transcript of RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES” (FIN - 10)
11
RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES”
(FIN - 10)
Russ Bingham
Vice President and Director of Corporate Research
Hartford Financial Services
Seminar on Ratemaking
Tampa, FL
March 7-8, 2002
22
Outline
Value Creation / Earnings Delivery Process Risk/Return – Focus on Value or Earnings? Building Blocks Risk / Return Principles Risk / Return Decision Framework – Risk Metrics Comparison of Policyholder and Shareholder Risk Metrics Dealing With Uncertainty and Risk – Two Key Questions Comprehensive Total Risk / Total Return Model What Differences?
33
The Value Creation / Earnings Delivery Process
Economic value creation begins with sound, economically based operating actions and ends with a consistent and growing distribution of earnings.
In Insurance this process embodies the following characteristics: Originating policy / accident period actions which lead to financial
results that emerge over subsequent calendar periods. Economic value creation measurements which differ from
conventional accounting with respect to the timing of income recognition.
Distinct contributions to the risk / return tradeoff from underwriting, investment and financial leverage activities.
A “complete” financial methodology should address all these aspects.
44
Risk / Return – Focus on Value or Earnings?
Economic Value Creation
OR
Earnings Reported
55
“Building Blocks”: Valuation Fundamentals
Balance sheet, income and cash flow statements
Development “triangles” of marketing / policy / accident period into calendar period
Accounting valuation: conventional (statutory or GAAP) and economic (present value)
plus
Risk / return decision framework which deals with separate underwriting, investment and leverage contributions
66
Policy (or Accident) / Calendar PeriodDevelopment Triangles
Balance Sheet, Income, Cash Flow
Calendar Period Policy Historical Future Total Period 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Ultimate Prior X X X X X …... --> Sum 1999 X X X X X …... --> Sum 2000 X X X X …... --> Sum
2001 X X X …... --> Sum2002 X X …... --> Sum2003 X …... --> Sum
==== ==== ==== ==== ==== Reported Sum Sum Sum Sum Sum Calendar
Rates and Economic valuation are oriented across the policy period “row” but regulatory review and wall street focus are typically on the calendar “column” sum
77
Risk / Return Principles Insurance = underwriting, investment and leverage Volatility is uncertainty of result Risk is exposure to adverse result Higher Underwriting and Investment returns are required when
volatility is greater Risk transfer pricing activities (policyholder, company &
shareholder) are based on risk parameters This can be accomplished independently of leverage
Total return is underwriting and investment return leveraged Leverage simultaneously magnifies total return and volatility
in total return, but NOT necessarily risk Diversification / covariance benefits with respect to underwriting,
investment and finance (i.e. surplus) exist in the aggregate beyond the sum of individual businesses and functions.
88
Total Return, Volatility and Risk
99
Risk / Return Decision Framework – Risk Metrics Policyholder oriented risk metrics
Probability of ruin Expected policyholder deficit (EPD)
Shareholder oriented risk metrics Variability in total return (R) Sharpe Ratio Value at risk (VAR) Tail Value at Risk (TVAR) Expected Shareholder Deficit Probability of surplus drawdown (PSD) Risk Coverage Ratio (RCR) Others …
RBC and other Rating Agency measuresIn one way or another all risk measures address the
likelihood and/or the severity of an adverse outcome
1010
Total Return Risk Schematic
1111
Comparison of Policyholder and Shareholder Risk Metrics
Shortcomings of Policyholder oriented risk metrics Narrow focus on loss typically does not reflect variability in loss payment,
premium amount and collection, expense amount and payment and the impact of taxes and investment income on float and surplus
Reliability of results is questionable due to basis upon extreme outcomes in tail of loss distribution
Inconsistency between measures of risk and return make management of the risk/return tradeoff difficult
Advantages of Shareholder oriented risk metrics Reflects all sources of variability Captures all relevant factors that impact bottom line Typically embodies more reliability Shareholder focus is more in tune with broader financial marketplace Should allow for diversification effects to be incorporated Addresses policyholder risks Provides an important link between price adequacy and solvency Consistency in measures of risk and return
1212
Dealing With Uncertainty and Risk -Two Key Questions
A critical modeling objective is to provide a framework for addressing the risk / return tradeoff, specifically addressing the following two questions:
What price should be charged (i.e. what is appropriate risk-adjusted return)?
How much capital is needed (i.e. what is appropriate risk-adjusted leverage)?
1313
The Answer:A Comprehensive Total Risk / Total Return Model
Fully integrated balance sheet, income and cash flow statements Calendar period financial results developed from “current and
prior” policy / accident period contributions Nominal and economic valuations Clearly and consistently stated parameter estimates
Premium, loss and expense amount Timing of premium collection, loss and expense payment Investment yield rates Underwriting and investment tax rates Leverage ratio and method (preferably risk-based) by which surplus
flows are controlled, including distribution of profits Risk-based pricing algorithm for underwriting and investment risk Risk-adjusted leverage algorithm Distributional outcomes of all key risk and return measures Quantification of underwriting, investment and leverage
risk/return relationship
1414
What Differences?
All methodologies are fundamentally reconcilable Comprehensive Total Risk / Total Return model encompasses
all approaches and methodologies ALL differences ultimately result from modeling CHOICES
Differences in presentation result from choices with respect to: Calendar or policy/accident period perspective Accounting focus on reported or economic basis Metrics used to measure risk and return Time frame emphasized Other . . .