Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.

Richland School District2013 EOY Gains Analysis

Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export

Prepared by Scholastic Data Analytics 2

Analysis Contents Section 1 Executive Summary

Section 2 READ 180 Student Performance Results

Section 3 System 44 Student Performance Results

Section 4 Appendix


Executive SummaryProgram ImplementationDuring the 2012-2013 school year, the district implemented both READ 180 and System 44 across 6 schools throughout the district.

READ 180 was implemented daily for 90 minutes System 44 was implemented daily for 60 minutes in a stand-alone classroom setting System 44 was implemented daily for 90 minutes in a mixed-model classroom setting

Indicators of Success 303 of 504 (60%) of READ 180 students demonstrated at least one year’s reading growth on SRI Of those students, 178 (35%) demonstrated at least two years’ reading growth on SRI 29 of 104 (28%) of System 44 students demonstrated at least one year’s growth on SRI 45 of 82 (55%) of System 44 students demonstrated at least one year’s growth on SPI Fluency

Items For Further Discussion Average READ 180 software usage was 102 sessions with 16 Segments completed. Average System 44 software usage was 90 sessions with 60 Topics completed. Recommended session length is 16-20 minutes; average session length was 18 minutes for READ

180 and 17 minutes for System 44. Students with more consistent software usage in both READ 180 and System 44 demonstrated

higher post-test Lexile scores.


Data Included in Analysis

Richland School District’s Gains Analysis includes student results from 8/28/12 to 6/6/13. To be included in the analysis, student records must:

1. Include at least 20 sessions (days) of software usage

2. Include at least two SRI tests, administered at least 6 weeks apart (READ 180 & System 44)

3. Include at least two SPI tests, administered at least 6 weeks apart (System 44)

To promote effective data analysis through SAM reports and gains analysis, Scholastic recommends:

4. Regularly updating SAM rosters to reflect current student enrollment

5. Establishing, communicating, and monitoring district SRI testing windows

Intervention ProgramTotal Records in Export

Students with 20+ Software Sessions

Total Students with Pre-Test SPI

Total Students with Post-Test SPI

Records with Adequate Weeks Between SPI

Total Students with Pre-Test SRI

Total Students with Post-Test SRI

Records with Adequate Weeks Between SRI

READ 180 Gains Records

System 44 Gains Records

Participated in Both Programs 60 59 55 37 35 59 59 59 51 50READ 180 User 473 454 75 6 4 454 454 453 453 0System 44 User 56 54 54 50 49 53 50 49 0 54Grand Total 589 567 184 93 88 566 563 561 504 104

SPI Testing SRI Testing


• SRI can be used to set reading goals and to evaluate students’ responsiveness to instruction by evaluating fall-to-spring growth expectations.

• Monitoring growth helps educators to determine if students are on track to meet state and federal achievement standards.

• The graph below illustrates the difference in Lexile scores for typical 7th grade students with various Lexile measures; data illustrates national norms – does not reflect students in the district.

• Expected growth can be determined by fall SRI Lexile; for more on using fall Lexiles to set growth goals consult the professional paper Growth Expectations – Setting Achievable Goals

Percentile 5th P 15th P 25th P 50th P 80th PFall to Spring

Growth+99L +69L +57L +46L +33L

SRI Growth Expectations


In previous years, Scholastic set forth recommended growth of 140L, 70L and 50L for Elementary, Middle and High School students (resp.). These metrics were based upon an assumption students were operating near the 25th percentile (READ 180) or 5th percentile (System 44).

Recently, Scholastic partnered with Meta Metrics Inc. to determine growth expectations based upon students’ grade levels and initial SRI Lexile scores. Gains Analyses now compare student performance to their individual potential growth rather than aggregate metrics at the school or grade level.

The mean value of students’ initial Lexile percentile and mean value of students’ expected growth is above; expected growth may vary.

Student Level Expected Gains READ 180 & System 44 Mean Lexiles by GradeREAD 180 Students

System 44 Students

Grade Level

Total READ 180 Records with Current Year Pre-Test SRI

Mean Percentile of Initial Lexile

Mean Expected Change in Lexiles

Grade 6 114 18 97Grade 7 112 20 82Grade 8 90 19 89Grade 9 69 22 70Grade 10 60 15 111Grade 11 39 22 101Grade 12 29 15 110READ 180 Total 513 19 91

Grade Level

Total Total System 44 Records with Current Year Pre-Test SRI

Mean Percentile of Initial Lexile


Grade 6 33 2 186Grade 7 25 3 258Grade 8 26 3 233Grade 9 12 1 288Grade 10 9 1 334Grade 11 3 1 351Grade 12 4 1 358System 44 Total 112 2 246

READ 180 Student Performance Results


READ 180 Super Stars

Data indicate 244 READ 180 Super Stars with evidence of both strong participation and Lexile Gains. The top 10 are shown above.

To reach “Reading Super Star” status, students must have:

1. Include at least 40 sessions (days) of software usage

2. Between 1 and 4 year’s approximate grade level growth

3. Pre-Test SRI Lexile score of over 100L.

Student Number Grade SchoolREAD 180 Segments

READ 180 Sessions

READ 180 Minutes

per Session

Pre-Test SRI Date

Pre-Test SRI Score

Post-Test SRI Date

Post-Test SRI Score

Years Growth in

LexilesStudent #1 6 Enterprise 25 143 22.4 8/30/2012 500 5/28/2013 892 4.0Student #2 8 Carmichael 18 139 20.3 9/4/2012 718 5/23/2013 998 4.0Student #3 6 Chief Joseph 25 150 19.2 9/4/2012 775 5/21/2013 1002 4.0Student #4 7 Chief Joseph 17 153 15.4 9/5/2012 450 5/21/2013 907 4.0Student #5 8 Carmichael 9 70 18.4 8/30/2012 928 5/22/2013 1129 3.9Student #6 6 Carmichael 41 148 22.4 9/10/2012 664 5/21/2013 934 3.9Student #7 11 Richland 13 106 15.3 9/4/2012 594 5/15/2013 937 3.9Student #8 8 Carmichael 12 43 15.9 8/30/2012 1193 12/17/2012 1307 3.8Student #9 7 Chief Joseph 19 143 16.7 9/4/2012 753 5/21/2013 981 3.8Student #10 7 Carmichael 15 106 17.8 9/10/2012 789 5/20/2013 1001 3.8


Scholastic recommends that READ 180 students complete the SRI four times a year for screening, progress monitoring, and instructional decision-making. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SRI tests. Strongest results are typically achieved when students participate in the READ 180 Instructional Model daily and when care is taken to ensure a positive testing environment. Compare results between midyear and end-of-year and between schools to spotlight successes and identify areas that need additional focus. Review the SRI Growth Summary Report for more information.

SRI Reading Gains READ 180 Mean Lexile Gains by Site


READ 180 Software Progress ResultsSegment Completion Analysis

Research indicates that maximum student learning gains are achieved when students participate in the READ 180 Instructional Software daily. In each Software Segment, students are expected to complete learning activities from five zones—Reading, Word, Spelling, Success, and Writing. Typically, students should complete a Segment within five to fifteen days (or Sessions) of usage. Review results above to determine overall software usage and completion, and compare those results against student SRI reading gains. Use SAM data from the READ 180 Results Summary Report to identify areas for continued focus.


READ 180 Results by SchoolSRI and Software Results

Results typically indicate a correlation between Software usage and reading growth. Use the chart below to track daily Software usage and compare against student SRI growth. When reviewing SRI growth, it is important to consider the average initial Lexile, as growth expectations vary based on initial Lexile. The approximate grade level growth column provides an average growth rate for the school based on individual growth expectations for each student, values color-coded low to high. Review the weeks between SRI tests to ensure all schools are testing within established testing windows. For Software usage, compare total sessions (days of usage) across all schools. On a standard 90-minute daily model, schools should strive for at least 100 sessions of usage. Average session length should be between 15-19 minutes. Review results to identify successes and areas that may need additional focus. Use the READ 180 Results Summary Report for more information.

SchoolGrade Range

Total READ 180

Gains Records

Initial Student SRI

Lexile

Current Student SRI

Lexile

Change in Lexile

% of Students

Exceeding Expectations

Expected Change in

Lexile

Approx Years

Growth

Weeks Between

SRI

Mean Total

Sessions

Mean Sessions

per Week

Session Length in Minutes

Mean Segments

Completed

Carmichael 6 to 8 115 717 873 156 82% 74 2.1 33 106 3.7 18.8 18Enterprise 6 to 8 81 557 697 140 59% 107 1.3 34 89 3.1 21.1 15Richland 9 to 12 118 766 858 92 54% 79 1.2 33 106 3.3 17.5 16Chief Joseph 6 to 8 112 657 755 99 58% 85 1.2 34 118 4.0 18.4 20Hanford 9 to 12 56 582 736 154 45% 144 1.1 34 89 2.9 17.0 12River's Edge 9 to 12 22 875 879 4 32% 56 0.1 32 59 2.3 14.3 7READ 180 SRI Total 6 to 12 504 681 800 119 60% 90 1.3 34 102 3.4 18.4 16

School Information Average SRI Results READ 180 Software Participation


Lexile Performance LevelsChanges in READ 180 Student SRI Performance

Results indicate how many students had SRI scores aligned to Lexile Performance Levels; levels indicated are aligned to state assessment performance levels when state assessment alignments were available. Results are positive when lower, non-proficient reader populations decline and higher, proficient reader populations increase. Lexile performance bands used in this analysis can be found in Appendix.


System 44 Student Performance

Results


SPI Proficiency ResultsSystem 44 Student Decoding Status

Scholastic recommends that System 44 students complete the SPI three times a year for screening and progress monitoring. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SPI tests. Students should be moving into higher levels of decoding as they progress through the program. Strongest results are typically achieved when students participate in the System 44 Instructional Model daily and when care is taken to ensure a positive testing environment. Compare results between pre-test and post-test to spotlight successes and identify areas that need additional focus. Review the SPI Summary Progress Report for more information.


SRI Proficiency ResultsChanges in System 44 Student SRI Performance

Scholastic recommends that System 44 students complete the SRI twice a year for screening and progress monitoring. Students included in this analysis completed at least two SRI tests at least 6 weeks apart. Results are positive when lower, non-proficient reader populations decline and higher, proficient reader populations increase. Students with low-level phonemic awareness likely are operating under the SRI Lexile scale.

Lexile performance bands used in this analysis can be found in Appendix.


System 44 Software Progress ResultsSeries Completion Analysis

Research indicates that maximum student learning gains are achieved when students participate in the System 44 Instructional Software daily. In each Software Series, students are expected to complete learning activities, called Topics, from four strands—Code, Word Strategies, Sight Words, and Success. Students who do not pass the progress monitor for a topic are cycled through the Topic again with new content, while students who pass the fast-track pre-test can skip topics. Review results above to determine overall software usage and completion, and compare those results against student SRI reading gains.


System 44 Software Progress ResultsSoftware Topic Completion Analysis

Research indicates that maximum student learning gains are achieved when students participate in the System 44 Instructional Software daily. In each Software Series, students are expected to complete learning activities, called Topics, from four strands—Code, Word Strategies, Sight Words, and Success. Students who do not pass the progress monitor for a Topic are cycled through the Topic again with new content, while students who pass the fast-track pre-test can skip topics. Review results above to determine overall software usage and completion. Review the System 44 Response to Intervention Summary Report for more information.


System 44 Results by SchoolSoftware Participation and Completion

Use the chart below to track student participation in System 44 by school. On a standard daily implementation of System 44, schools should strive for 100 sessions of usage. In the standard implementation model, students should participate in the Software daily for 15-19 minutes each day (or session). Regular use of software helps students complete the Topics more quickly; when all 160 Topics have been completed, the student is ready to exit System 44. Review the results below to identify successes and schools that may need additional support. Use the System 44 Response to Intervention Summary Report for more information.

School Grade Range

Total System 44

Records W/ 6+ Sessions

Mean Total Sessions


Software Topics

Completed (of 160)

Software Series

Completed (of 25)

% of Students with 16+ Hours Use by End of

YearCarmichael 6 to 8 34 93 18.7 75 14 91%Chief Joseph 6 to 8 28 101 19.6 86 14 89%Enterprise 6 to 8 20 82 11.3 34 10 25%Hanford 9 to 12 16 81 19.3 28 9 75%Richland 9 to 10 6 80 15.5 34 9 50%System 44 User Total 6 to 12 104 90 17.4 60 12 73%

Manually Placed Gr. 7 1 47 17.0 80 25 0%Series I 6 to 12 73 98 17.6 50 10 79%Series IV 6 to 11 30 73 17.0 85 17 60%

Enrollment Information Software Usage Averages


Implementation Recommendations

1. Recognize the achievement of classrooms with strong results and take steps to replicate those results in other classrooms.

2. Review results with schools/classes who did not achieve at least one year’s growth or who had a significant number of students below 20 sessions (coded yellow or red on gains analysis report).

3. Continue to support teachers with SRI retesting procedures.

4. Examine enrollment to ensure maximum license usage and impact on student achievement.

5. Continue building capacity of leadership with ongoing training and in-school support.

6. Provide ongoing training for both novice and experience teachers.

7. Provide monthly coaching to novice teachers and a minimum of quarterly coaching for experienced teachers.


Appendix


Scholastic SRI Proficiency BandsLexile Grade-Level Performance Bands

Grade Below Basic

Basic Proficient Advanced

1 N/A 0L – 99L 100L – 400L 401L+

2 0L – 99L 100L – 249L 300L – 600L 601L+

3 0L – 249L 250L – 349L 500L – 800L 801L+

4 0L – 349L 350L – 599L 600L – 900L 901L+

5 0L – 449L 450L – 699L 700L – 1000L 1000L+

6 0L – 499L 500L – 799L 800L – 1050L 1051L+

7 0L – 549L 550L - 849L 850L – 1100L 1101L+

8 0L – 599L 600L - 899L 900L – 1150L 1151L+

9 0L – 649L 650L – 999L 1000L – 1200L 1201L+

10 0L – 699L 700L - 1024L 1025L – 1250L 1251L+11 / 12 0L – 799L 800L – 1049L 1050L – 1300L 1301L+

Lexile performance levels as determined by Meta Metrics, Inc.


SAM AYP Sub-Group Gains AnalysisResults by SAM Sub-Groups by Program

READ 180 Students System 44 Students

SAM Sub-Group

Total SRI Gains Records in Analysis


Mean Change in Lexile

% of Students with 2x Expected Growth

Female 18 82 55 17%Male 32 66 79 28%Not Specified 454 92 124 37%READ 180 Total 504 90 119 35%

African American 2 80 -5 0%American Indian 0 0 0 0%Asian 0 0 0 0%Caucasian 33 70 67 24%Hispanic 13 70 114 31%Pacific Islander 2 101 -83 0%Multiple 0 0 0 0%

GENED 50 72 70 24%SPED 0 0 0 0%

Not LEP 43 70 67 23%LEP 7 81 92 29%

SAM Sub-Group

Total SRI Gains Records in Analysis


Mean Change in Lexile

% of Students with 2x Expected Growth

Female 2 301 189 0%Not Specified 97 246 115 5%System 44 Total 99 247 117 5%

African American 0 0 0 0%American Indian 0 0 0 0%Asian 1 243 378 0%Caucasian 0 0 0 0%Hispanic 1 358 0 0%Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0%Multiple 0 0 0 0%

GENED 2 301 189 0%SPED 0 0 0 0%

Not LEP 1 358 0 0%LEP 1 243 378 0%


READ 180 Student Record AnalysisData Inclusion Process by School

School

Total READ 180 Records in Export




Records With Insufficient READ 180 Use

READ 180 Gains Records

Records Not Enrolled At Time of Export

BR Students of All READ 180 Students

Proficient Students of All READ 180 Students

Carmichael 130 121 121 121 15 115 21 1 35Chief Joseph 117 114 114 114 5 112 4 1 13Enterprise 84 81 81 81 3 81 2 5 6Hanford 56 56 56 56 0 56 0 14 8Richland 123 119 119 118 4 118 4 4 14River's Edge 23 22 22 22 1 22 0 0 4READ 180 Total 533 513 513 512 28 504 31 25 80

SRI Testing READ 180 Data Sub-Sets


READ 180 Results by ClassSRI and Software ResultsClass data in exports may reflect non-READ 180 classes. Accuracy of exported data is dependent upon clean SAM database. If inaccurate classes appear, examine SAM to clean up enrollment. Classes below reflect READ 180-aligned class when available and global class alignment (selected alphabetically from many) when no READ 180 class alignment exists for records.

SchoolGrade Range

Total READ 180 Gains Records

Initial Student SRI

Lexile

Current Student SRI

Lexile

Change in Lexile

% of Students w/

1+ Year's Growth

Expected Change in

Lexile

Approx Grade Level

Growth

Weeks Between

SRI

Mean Total Sessions

Sessions per Week


Mean Segments

Completed

Carmichael 6 to 8 115 717 873 156 82% 74 2.1 33.1 106 4 18.8 18#GCD_1010-4 Gr. 6 1 911 1012 101 100% 45 2.2 14.0 69 4 22.3 9#GCD_1010-9 Gr. 6 1 1101 1227 126 100% 27 4.7 6.0 28 4 21.1 3#GCD_1210-16 Gr. 8 1 748 997 249 100% 67 3.7 31.9 31 3 23.9 6#GCD_1210-8 Gr. 8 1 1015 999 -16 0% 45 -0.4 15.1 21 3 11.6 1#GCD_1210-9 Gr. 8 1 928 1129 201 100% 51 3.9 37.9 70 4 18.4 9#GCD_1222-1(8th Reading Plus) Gr. 8 2 703 1101 398 100% 76 5.3 31.9 50 4 15.8 5#GCD_2140-7 Gr. 7 1 873 976 103 100% 50 2.1 29.1 37 3 14.9 3#GCD_2310-7 Gr. 6 1 605 759 154 100% 78 2.0 14.0 70 4 21.1 12#GCD_2320-2 Gr. 7 2 939 1085 147 100% 46 3.2 14.6 39 4 19.3 7#GCD_2330-6 Gr. 8 1 847 978 131 100% 57 2.3 18.3 27 3 17.8 3#GCD_Exited Read 180 6 to 8 3 829 977 148 100% 54 2.7 12.8 40 4 19.8 51006-5 Anderson 180 6 to 7 23 681 782 101 61% 71 1.4 36.5 114 3 16.6 161008-1 Gr. 6 21 652 844 191 90% 75 2.6 34.5 127 4 20.4 221040-2 7 to 8 2 340 295 -45 0% 183 -0.2 36.7 68 3 18.6 281040-4 Anderson SYS 44 Gr. 6 2 261 372 112 50% 188 0.6 37.9 26 3 17.6 51108-1 7 to 8 16 675 831 156 94% 77 2.0 33.8 117 4 19.8 231122-4 Noble Gr. 7 2 937 1105 168 100% 47 3.6 27.8 71 4 21.5 111190-5 7 to 8 10 695 909 214 100% 91 2.4 35.5 108 4 18.9 161208-1 Gr. 8 11 763 978 216 100% 71 3.0 36.8 135 4 18.5 221314-11 Gr. 8 1 1052 1129 77 100% 43 1.8 39.1 65 4 19.8 61326-1 6 to 8 12 833 958 125 58% 62 2.0 33.0 117 4 18.6 28




SchoolGrade Range


Initial Student SRI

Lexile

Current Student SRI

Lexile

Change in Lexile

% of Students w/

1+ Year's Growth

Expected Change in

Lexile

Approx Grade Level

Growth

Weeks Between

SRI

Mean Total Sessions

Sessions per Week


Mean Segments

Completed

Chief Joseph 6 to 8 112 657 755 99 58% 85 1.2 34.4 118 4 18.4 20#GCD_1122-7032 Gr. 7 5 889 1025 136 100% 49 2.8 37.2 90 4 17.5 14#GCD_2030-6013 Gr. 8 1 863 903 40 0% 56 0.7 19.7 62 3 19.5 11#GCD_2030-6053 Gr. 7 1 958 896 -62 0% 45 -1.4 6.3 34 4 17.0 2#GCD_2230-8013 Gr. 8 1 788 873 85 100% 62 1.4 28.0 103 3 18.0 18#GCD_SMI-8th Gr. 8 2 868 988 121 100% 55 2.2 24.8 99 4 18.6 201008-6013 Gr. 6 16 583 638 56 44% 95 0.6 35.3 107 4 19.4 161008-6023 Gr. 6 14 457 598 141 50% 122 1.1 34.7 88 4 19.0 171108-7013 Gr. 7 18 713 790 76 50% 68 1.1 33.8 130 4 17.0 181108-7023 Gr. 7 20 662 787 125 70% 86 1.5 31.8 116 4 17.1 181208-8013 Gr. 8 14 683 781 99 71% 89 1.1 38.3 138 4 18.5 231208-8023 Gr. 8 13 755 880 126 62% 69 1.8 36.5 141 4 18.6 249314-6011 6 to 7 2 556 511 -46 50% 87 -0.5 37.1 161 4 23.9 38Read 180 6 to 8 5 493 574 81 20% 114 0.7 37.2 145 4 22.4 32

Enterprise 6 to 8 81 557 697 140 59% 107 1.3 33.8 89 3 21.1 15#GCD_2040-2 Gr. 6 1 656 608 -48 0% 70 -0.7 18.7 89 4 24.2 14#GCD_2310-1 Gr. 6 1 796 786 -10 0% 54 -0.2 9.1 57 3 24.8 9#GCD_2310-4 Gr. 8 1 989 1003 14 0% 47 0.3 6.7 31 4 20.1 7#GCD_2310-5 Gr. 7 1 790 838 48 0% 56 0.9 15.6 35 3 17.0 31006-1/Bacon 6 to 8 18 553 681 127 50% 101 1.3 34.6 74 3 21.7 141006-2 Gr. 6 18 476 637 161 67% 124 1.3 34.9 111 3 22.7 201006-3/Bacon 7 to 8 19 655 789 134 63% 87 1.5 34.8 74 3 19.6 111006-4 6 to 7 15 469 620 150 60% 125 1.2 35.8 110 3 22.8 199303-1 6 to 8 7 552 741 190 86% 123 1.5 34.1 94 3 15.5 15




SchoolGrade Range


Initial Student SRI

Lexile

Current Student SRI

Lexile

Change in Lexile

% of Students w/

1+ Year's Growth

Expected Change in

Lexile

Approx Grade Level

Growth

Weeks Between

SRI

Mean Total Sessions

Sessions per Week


Mean Segments

Completed

Hanford 9 to 12 56 582 736 154 45% 144 1.1 34.4 89 3 17.0 12#GCD_9380-1 Gr. 10 1 0 717 717 100% 364 2.0 15.0 36 3 16.1 11354-1 9 to 12 20 666 777 111 45% 122 0.9 34.2 91 3 17.2 151354-2 Gr. 9 1 64 525 461 100% 305 1.5 36.9 129 4 25.4 351354-3 9 to 10 4 256 272 15 0% 224 0.1 29.0 96 3 17.7 111364-1 10 to 11 11 800 858 59 36% 69 0.9 35.4 88 3 14.4 61364-2 10 to 11 2 1060 1066 7 0% 43 0.2 21.5 68 3 20.0 111364-3 Gr. 10 5 365 492 128 60% 200 0.6 38.1 96 3 18.0 101374-1 Gr. 11 1 882 985 103 100% 55 1.9 38.0 105 3 17.0 111374-2 Gr. 11 1 0 1130 1130 100% 358 3.2 36.9 126 4 18.8 331374-3 11 to 12 4 234 499 265 50% 240 1.1 37.7 86 3 17.7 101384-1 Gr. 12 3 950 1059 109 33% 51 2.1 38.0 72 2 15.0 91384-3 Gr. 12 3 249 672 423 67% 223 1.9 38.0 87 3 17.8 11

Richland 9 to 12 118 766 858 92 54% 79 1.2 33.1 106 3 17.5 16#GCD_3374-7 Gr. 9 1 999 977 -22 0% 38 -0.6 14.7 66 4 16.5 131354-1 9 to 12 17 810 920 110 59% 79 1.4 35.4 109 3 17.3 171354-2 9 to 12 16 715 824 109 63% 84 1.3 34.4 113 3 17.0 151354-3 9 to 12 18 689 760 71 44% 94 0.8 32.1 97 3 17.6 151354-4 9 to 12 17 817 861 45 53% 69 0.6 28.9 95 3 17.9 151354-5 9 to 11 11 702 771 69 45% 113 0.6 36.1 113 3 18.9 251354-6 9 to 12 19 827 954 127 74% 59 2.2 32.8 110 3 17.1 161354-7 9 to 12 17 809 903 94 41% 61 1.5 34.3 115 3 17.5 143374-1 9 to 12 2 357 587 230 50% 176 1.3 35.7 103 3 17.1 15

River's Edge 9 to 12 22 875 879 4 32% 56 0.1 32.2 59 2 14.3 71354-1 9 to 12 13 848 834 -14 23% 57 -0.2 33.4 65 2 14.7 71354-2 9 to 12 9 913 944 31 44% 55 0.6 30.5 49 2 13.8 8

READ 180 SRI Total 6 to 12 504 681 800 119 60% 90 1.3 33.6 102 3 18.4 16



READ 180 Snapshot ReportSoftware Use for All Students with 1+ Session

School Grade Range

Total READ 180

User Records (1 or More

Session)

Mean Total Sessions


Sessions Per Week

Software Segments

Completed (of 60)

% of Students with Data for

Gains Analysis

Carmichael 6 to 8 130 95 18.1 3.5 16 88%Chief Joseph 6 to 8 117 114 18.2 3.9 19 96%Enterprise 6 to 8 84 87 21.0 3.0 15 96%Hanford 9 to 12 56 89 17.0 2.9 12 100%Richland 9 to 12 123 103 17.5 3.3 15 96%River's Edge 9 to 12 23 57 13.9 2.3 7 96%READ 180 User Total 6 to 12 533 97 18.1 3.3 16 95%

Enrollment Information Software Usage Averages


System 44 Student Record AnalysisData Inclusion Process by School

SchoolStudents w/ Software Use

Students with Less Than 20+ Software Sessions

System 44 Usage Sample

Total Students with Pre-Test SPI

Total Students with Post-Test SPI

Records with Adequate Weeks Between SPI




Carmichael 38 4 34 37 29 29 37 37 37Chief Joseph 28 0 28 28 23 23 27 27 26Enterprise 21 1 20 20 16 16 20 18 18Hanford 17 1 16 16 13 11 17 16 16Richland 12 6 6 8 6 5 11 11 11System 44 Total 116 12 104 109 87 84 112 109 108

SPI Testing SRI Testing


System 44 SPI Gains AnalysisSPI Metrics by School

SchoolGrade Range

Total System 44 SPI Gains Records

Initial Mean Accuracy of 60

Current Mean Accuracy of 60

Change in Accuracy

% of Students w/ Improved Accuracy

Initial Mean Fluency of 60

Current Mean Fluency of 60

Change in Fluency

% of Students w/ 4+ Point Increase in Fluency

Carmichael 6 to 8 28 36 42 5 75% 7 17 10 71%Chief Joseph 6 to 8 23 35 41 5 83% 11 15 4 52%Enterprise 6 to 8 16 32 36 4 69% 12 14 2 44%Hanford 9 to 12 11 26 30 4 82% 6 8 3 36%Richland 9 to 10 4 33 36 4 100% 5 5 1 50%System 44 SPI Total 6 to 12 82 34 39 5 78% 9 14 5 55%


System 44 SRI Gains AnalysisSRI Metrics by School

SchoolGrade Range

Total System 44 SRI Gains Records

Initial Student SRI

Lexile

Current Student SRI

Lexile

Change in Lexile

% of Students

Exceeding Expectations

Expected Change in

Lexile

Approx Grade Level

Growth

Weeks Between

SRI

Mean Total

Sessions


Mean Series Completed

Carmichael 6 to 8 34 285 413 129 47% 199 0.6 36 93 18.7 14Hanford 9 to 12 15 4 185 182 13% 351 0.5 31 83 18.7 9Chief Joseph 6 to 8 26 236 322 86 27% 216 0.4 35 105 19.6 15Richland 9 to 10 6 111 219 109 17% 286 0.4 31 80 15.5 9Enterprise 6 to 8 18 104 192 88 17% 281 0.3 33 83 11.8 11System 44 SRI Total 6 to 12 99 186 303 117 29% 247 0.5 34 92 17.5 13

School Information Average SRI Results System 44 Software Participation


SRI Data & Placement Recommendations

Students will gain the most Lexiles when placed in the appropriate reading intervention tier. Students with BR (0-100L) SRI could have reading skills too low for SRI to measure or poor motivation. Students with low Lexile scores (0-400L) could have gaps in decoding skills that would only become apparent with a phonemic awareness assessment such as SPI. Students with SRI scores under 400L (grades 3 to 5) or under 600L (grades 6 to 12) should most likely be in Tier 3 intervention. Students with proficient SRI scores most likely need Tier 1 intervention.

School

Students with BR Pre-Test

SRI

Students with Pre-Test SRI Under 400L

Students with Proficient Pre-

Test SRI

Carmichael 9 24 35Chief Joseph 9 23 13Enterprise 14 30 6Hanford 19 21 8Richland 8 15 14River's Edge 0 0 4

District Total 59 113 80

Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.

Documents

Transcript of Richland School District 2013 EOY Gains Analysis Data reflects implementation by 7/16/13 export.