Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)

8/22/2019 Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)

1/15

Hohenstein, Joseph C.Orlow, Kaplan & Hohenstein, LLP

Depae sce

Executive Oce r Imigraion Review

Boa of mmigation ppalsOc of th Clk

5107.lesburg Pik, Sut JO(Fas C/ch irgi :204

HS LIT.Nork Co PrisonOR3400 Concord oad

P.O Box 40017, 620 Chestnut St., Suite 656Philadelphia, PA 19106

York, PA 17402

ame: YAMWAGE, RICHARD MICHREA A029-043-107

Date of this notice 3/14/2011

Enclosed is a copy of he Board's decision nd order in the above-rerenced cse.

nclosure

Pnel Mebers:Grnt, Edward RLiebowitz, llen CMullane, Hugh G

Sincerely,

Donn CrrChief Clerk


2/15

US ;epartment ofJustice Executive Oc r Imigration Review

Fas Churh, Virginia 224

Fie: A029 043 107 - York, PA

In e: RICHMEKANWANGE

I REMOVAL PROCEEDIGS

CRTIFICATION

Deision of the Board of Imiation Appeals

Date:MAR 14 201!

O BEHAF OF SPONDET: Joseph C. Hohenstein, Esquie

O BEHF OF DHS: Alice Song HaryeAssistant Chief Counsel

GE:

otice: Sec. 27(a)(2)(A)(iii), &N Act[8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii)] onvicted of aggravated eony as dened insection 101(a)(43)(A), I&N Act 8 SC 1101(a)(43)(A)

Sec. 237(a)(2)(A)(iii), I&N Act [8 U.S.C 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) onvicted of aggravated feony as dened insection 01(a)(43)(F), I& Act [8 .S.C. 110(a)(43)(F)

APPLIATION: Teination

The responent, a native and citizen of Kenya, appeale om an oder o the Immigation Juge,ated October 1, 200, nding him remoabe as charged. On Novembe 8, 200, we reed he

ecord to he Immition Judge issuance of an oal o wien decision. Te Immgraion Jugeissued an oal decision on ovember 18, 2010, and ceied he case to he Boad The recod wibeemanded to a dierent Immiation Judge r a new heaing and he eny of a new decision.

We review the nings o ct, including deteminations ocredibiity, made by the ImiationJudge unde a "cerly eoneous sandard. 8 F.R 003.1 ( d)(3)(i) We eview al oe issues,incuding whehe e paies have met the elevant burden of poof, and issues of iscetion, undea

denovo stanard. 8 .F.R. 1003.(d)(3)(ii)

e seera ears ts ase, te espodet haened is reoabiiy as an aienconvicted o an agated oy At the nal hearing on August 11, 201, e Imigation udgeined the paies hat he woud nd he respondent emovable as charged and woud explain is

easoning in a ate oral decision; e he stated hat e woud entertain rte chaenges toremovabiliy duing he next heaing (T at 2223, 26). The poceedings wee reset unti Novembe1, 2010 so hat he respoent and is atoey coud con about possibe eief om removaTr. at 29)

Cite as: Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)


3/15

029 03 10

On Sepember 30 2010, he reponden, roug a ng by h coune, noied e Iaonudge ha e would reee he r o le an appeal on e iue oremovabily, bu would nobe appyng r ree om remova. The reponden requeed ha a na deciio be ued berehe cheduled hearng dae On Ocober 2010, e Immigraion Judge ued a m order,which noed ha he reponden reerved appea The reponde ed an appea, and e Boardremanded he record o he maon Judge r he uance o a wen or ora decon a iumma order provided no reaon r h deciion.

n h November 18, 2010, deciion he mmgraion Judge cued on he acion o ereponden' aoey, ang ha he he wa "broadided by he coune, ad ha he appeawa "voou (J. a 6) The Immgraon Judge her criczed he reponden counel andrerenced hi conduc in a compeely unrelaed cae Id a 68). Te mmaon Judge ndicaedae ud he reponden' reque ra nal order anamoun o a waver o appea.

ubequenly led appea bre, e reponden, hroug coune, ae ha hi

removabi no adequaely addreed by he mmigraon Judge. Coe alo ake ue whhe mmaon Judge characeraon o i acon.

We aee ha he Immaion Judge' November 18, 2010, decon o provde adequaelegal anay oremovaby, whch he acowledged wa "a dcul ega iue (Tr a 28) Taone would war anoher remand. We alo nd ha he Immaon Judge' decion conaundue cicm o he reponden' counel. The reponden repeaedy ndicaed he wachallenging hi removabiy, and he wce aed e wa reeng appea in h Sepember 30, 20I 0,ng w e Immgraon Cour. The Immiaion Judge ao acowledged ha he repondereeed appea n he umma order he ubequeny ued. I erere no apparen wy heImmigraion Judge und he Sepember 30 ng o be anamou o a waver o appea, or a e

woud be jued in iung a decion wihou addreng e mer o he removal charge ao no approprae r an mmgaion Judge o deem an appeal a "ivolou a i he Board'k o evaluae appellae ng. Fnaly, we do no nd he mmgraion Judge' menion o ec and ideing aon o an unreaed cae o be proper.

nder e oaliy o circumance preened, we deem i approprae o remd he record oa dieren Immao Judge r a ew hearing and r he e o a new deco. Accordngy,e llowng order w be enered

ORDER The mmigraion Judge order daed Ocober 2010, and hi decion daedovember 18, 2010, are vacaed.

URTHER ORDE The record i remanded o a dieren mmgraion Judge r a new hearngand e eny o a new dcion

2Cite as: Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)


4/15

NITED STATES PTMENT OF JUSTICEXECUTIV OFFIC FOR IMMIGRATION RVIEW

IMMIGRTIO CORT

3400 CONCORD RO, SUITE 2

ORLW & OROW

OHNSTI OSEP C

YORK PA 17402

O BOX 40017; 620 CESTNT ST STE 656

EPIA PA 19106

I E MATTER OF

YWG RICARD MICRE

M-575

FI A 029043107

E TO FORWARD O DRESS PROVIDED

ATE: Nov 18 2010

TTACED IS COY OF TE DCISION OF TE IMMIGTION JGE. TIS DECISOS FIN SS APE IS FID WIT T OD OF IIGRATIO APPEAS

ITI 30 CED DAYS OF DAT OF TE IIG OF IS WRITT DECISO

T ECOSED FORS A ISTRUCTIONS FOR PROPRY PRING YOUR AE

OUR OTICE OF APPEA ATTCED DOCMTS A FE OR FE WAIVR REQUESTST E MAID TO: OD OF IMMIGTION EAS

OFFIC OF TE CERKO OX 8530FAS CURC VA 22041

TTACED IS A COY OF T DCISIO OF TE IIGTIO JGE AS TE RESU

F YOUR FAIRE TO AE T YO SCUED DPORTATIO OR REMOV EARIG

IS DECISION IS FINA SS A MOTION TO REOPE IS FIED I ACCORDCE

IT SCTIO 242(c) (3) OF TE IMMIGTION A ATIOAITY CT 8 USCECTION l252c)(3) I DPORTATIO PROCEEDINGS OR SCTION 240(c)(6)

8 u.sc. SCTION 1229ac)6) I REMOV PROCEEDINGS IF YOU FI A MOTIOO REO YO MOTION MUST E FIED WIT TIS COURT

IMMIGTION COURT3400 CONCORD RO SUITE 2

YORK, PA 17402

X OTER: rder of Adminstrate Return/Certfcato to the oard

CC: Offce of Chef Counse400 ncrd Radork A 17402

BLSCOURT CRKIMMIGRTION CORT FF


5/15

(i

U S DE PARTMENT OF JUSTICEEXECUTIVE OFFCE FOR MMGRATON REVEW

IMMGRATON COURT

York, Pennyvania

Fie A9 043 07 Date: November 1, 00

In the Matter of

RICHARD MICHREKA NYAMWANGE IN REMOVAL PROCEEDNS

Repondent

CHARGE:

APPLCATON:

APPEARANCES:

Under Section 37 (a) () (A) (i) of theigration and Nationality Act a amended inthat anytime after admiion the Repondentwa convicted of an aggravated feony adefined in Section (a) (43) (A) of the Act, aaw relating to eal aat And nderSection 37 {a) () {A) (iii) of the migrationand Nationa Act a amended in that anytimeafter admiion the Repondent wa convictedof an aggravated feony a defined in Section

(a) {43) {F) of the Act, a crime of vioence{a defined in Section 6 of Title 8 UnitedState Code, bt not inclding a preypolitical offene) for which the term ofimprionment ordered i at eat one year

Repondent eek no application TheReondent reqeted an Order of Removal TheRepondent oght an Order of Remova andpecificaly reqeted it on or abotSetember the 30th, of 0 0, and pe the

Repondent reqet in ch etter the Cortied the Order of Remova in Repondentce

ON BEHAL O RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF THE DE PARTMENTOF HOMELAND SECURTY

Joeh C Horntein Eqire Aice Hardy, Eqire


6/15

ORAL DECISION OF TE MMGRATON JUDE

FNDNGS REGARDING REMOVAILTY

The Repondent i a native and citizen of Kenya ho a

admitted to the United State at Queen, Ne York, on or abot

Agt the 8th, 97, a an 1 tudent On or about September

the 30th, 988, hi tatu a adjuted to that of a af

permanent reident under Section 240 of the Act On Febrary the

t, 2008, the Repondent a convicted in Pennyvania in te

Cort of Comon Pea at Monroe County for the offene of eua

aaut, in vioation of Tite 18 (325-) of the Pennylvana

Crimina Statue On or abot Febrary the t, 2008, Repondent

a convicted in the Pennyvania Cort of Coon Pea at Monroe

County for the offene of aggravated ndecent aat ithout

conent, in vioation of Tite 18 (3121) of the Pennyvania

Crimina Statue For thee offene te Repondent a convicted

to and a haf to five year in prion

The Repondent, throgh hi cone, acknoedged

receipt of the Notice to Appear and drng a proceedng th a

prior Iigration Jdge, not the one ittng today, admitted

aegation one through four and denied aegaton five and i

hich ere the crmina convction and denied the charge When

thi particuar Judge receved the Record of Proceedng n th

particar caethi Jdge reveed the Repondent cae and the

evdence ubmitted by the Department of omeand Secrity

contained n Ehibit # Va thee document and the Notce o

A 9 043 07 Noveber 8, 00


7/15

Appear tis Court concudd that Respondent was in fact convicted

of these crimes. Te Rspondent's counsel did not object to th

sumission o Exhibit #2 in this particular case and therefor it

was proper for this Court to use and review such sumissions rom

te Departmnt

On or aout June the 12th, 2008 the Department arrsted

tis individual and placed him in proceedings See Exiit # and

Exhiit #2 Based upon the Respondents admissions and te

eidenc submitted the epartmet of omeland Security in

Exhiit #2, this Court concluded tat as a matter of fact te

Department of Homeland Security proved by cear and convincing

0vreidence that te Respondent was admitted tosuect ing

removed. See Exhiit #1 and Exibit #2 This Court also

concluded as a matter of law that te Department of Homeland

Security proved by clear and convincing evidence te Rspondent is

removable from the nited States. The evidence was reasonale

sustantial and probative A Section 240 (c) (3) (A) See

Exhibits #1 and Exhibits #2.

THE SSE REGARG REMOABLITY

The issue regarding rmovabilit is that te Respondnt

elieves e was not convicted and the Respondent also elives

that is convictions wre not aggravated felonies. As stated

above, this Court concludd that th Respondnt was convicted of

aggravated felonies and that such aggravated felonies were

particular serious crims. This Court concludd that Respondents

A 29 043 07 3 ovember 18 2010


8/15

.(

covictio for sxua assaut and for aggravatd indcnt assaut

witout consnt was a aggravatd fon undr Sction

(a) (43) () of t ct. Tis Court aso concudd tat

Rspondtsconvictions wr aso cris of vionc undr

Sctio (a) (43) (F) of t ct. Tis Court aso cocudd tat

Rspodt's sntnc to two and a af to fiv ars in prison in

t aggrgat aso rndrd is aggravatd fon covictions

particuar srious cris nd v if t Rspodt was not

sntcd to two and a af to fiv ars in priso in t

aggrgat, tis Court woud concud tat t Rspondt's crims

ar particuar srious cris S N Sctio 24 () (3)

Kaplun v Attorey Gra, 602 F 3d 260 (3rd Cir 200) ; attrof N--M-, 24 &N Dc 336 (B 2007) ; Bo v S, 458 F3d 213

(3rd Cir 2006) N Sction (a) (43) (F) dfins t cri of

vioc as a cri dfind in Sction 6 of Tit 18, itd

Stats Cod, ut not a pur poitica offns, wit t tr of

iprisont is at ast o a is a particuar srious cri

18 S C Sction 6 dfins or dscris t tr cri of

vioc as (a) an offns tat as an nt t us, attptd

us or tratd us of psica forc agaist a prson or

proprt of anotr, or () an otr offns tat is a fo and

tat its natur invovs a sustantia risk tat psica forc

against t prson or proprt of anotr a usd in t

cours of coitting t offns. S Francis v Rno, 269 F. 3d

62 (3rd Cir 2001) ; S v cQuikin, 97 . 3d 723 (3rd Cir 996)

29 043 07 4 Novr 8, 200


9/15

ot on did thi Cout concude that Repondent wa

conicted o aggraated eonie but that hi aggraated eon

coniction wee particuar eiou cie. here wee no

iue in thi Cout ind egarding eoabiit o that the

Repondent wa not conicted o an aggaated eon o

particua eiou crie

PROCEEDRL HITOR

Thi cae beoe thi Judge wa on ariou Mate

Caenda nd on ugut the 1th, 2010, thee wa a MateCaena whee the Repondent' coune and the goernent coune

apeaed Thi Cout peciica inoed the Repondent

coune that the Cout had ade a deciion and that that deciion

wa that the Repondent wa conicted o aggraated eonie and

that uch aggaated eonie wee particua eiou cie

The Reondent coune did not a anthing at that point

egarding thi except wanted an indepth o ore expanation

egading the Court inding hi Cout inored the

Repondent and the goenent coune that it beieed the

Repondent being conicted o paticuar eiou cie wa

eigibe on or deera o reoa unde the Conention gaint

ortue and that the Repondent houd ie an apication o

deerra Thi Court ao inormed the Repondent coune that

the Court wi iue an ora deciion ate the ina heaing

hat oa deciion woud hae been rendered ate the Repondent

preented hi cae on deerra o reoa. Thi Court reet the

29 03 107 5 oeber 1 2010


10/15

ce fo ovebe the 10th 2010, n orde fo the Repondent to

fe 8 appcation for defer of reov

At no tie duing th Mater Clendr did the

Repondent coune eve indicte that he w gong to ppea

thi decion befoe rendeed an ol decion t no te

durng tt Mate Caendar w th Cout awe tht the

Repondent coune w gong to fle an ppel to the Bod

before th Cout rendered an oral decon Therefore t

Court w eenty brodided on thi ue ot ony that on

or bout Septeber the 30th, 2010, thi Cout received oton

fro the Repondent through h coune akng fo an Oder of

Reovl And the Repondent ought n orde nd an order w

ued Then on o bout oveber the 10th ot on the e

dy that the Mter Calend eet wa chedued thi Court

receved notification fo the Board of igation Appe to

ue n o decion n th atter Th Court i then left

gueing to why the Repondent h fied n ppel without

going through the poce nd wating for t Cout to ue a

decon n te deferra of reoval cae befoe flng an appe

AAYSS

Thi Court beieve that the Repondent appe i

frvolou. See A Section 20b 6 of the Act T Court

tate that becaue n an unreated cae n a bond atter unde A

fie A 028 6 276 in the atter of au A Tovti, te

Repondent hd waved appea n a bond tte and then fed an

A 2 03 10 6 oveber 18 2010


11/15

(

apeal to te oad o mmaton Appeas ate e ad waved te

bond matte s s te same attone n A 028 4 2 tat s

epesentn ts ndvdual n te case now n ean unde

A 029 043 107 s seems to be a tpe o patten wt ts

patcula attone. e patten tat ts Cout sees s tat

ts attone wll wave appeal o wll ask o an ode and ten

te case would be taen out te noma pocess and once tat

appensis attone ten les an appeal And tats w ts

Cout beeves tat te appea n te nstant case s actuall

voous

Anote eason w ts Cout beeves ts appeal s

volous s because 8 C F Secton 140 12 decson o te

aton Jude unde Secton wee t talks aout a summay

decson t sas not wtstandn te povsons o paaap A

o ts secton n an case wee nassbt o

epotablt s detemned unde pleadns pusuant to Secton

1240 (b) and te espondent does not make an appcaton unde

Secton 40. 11 te alen s statuto neble o ee o

te espondent appes o volunta depatue onl and te

mmaton Jude ants te applcaton te mmaton Jude

ma ente a sua decson o volunta depatue s

anted a sua decson wt an altenate Ode o eoval

Well ts attone ased o an ode and dd not le te I589

applcaton as te Cout nstucted m to do on o beoe

ovembe te 10t of 2010

A 29 043 107

eeoe t was pope o ts

7 ovembe 18 2010


12/15

Court to ssue sury decso. The Respodet's cousel

shoud kow tht t ws proper or ths Court to ssue summry

decson sce he hs been prctcn n ts locl re or qute

some tme Tereore ths Court seems to beleve tt ths

ttorney s usn d busn the ppel process or hs ow

mens nd suspect the cse n hern tht th ttorney s

usn te ppel process to n some tme or s cent nd s

enn n Jlory tctcs The ttorney n hs letter or

order dcted somethn bout hbes corpus Tereore ts

Court beleves tht ts ttorney s ln ths ppel

rvolously nd s tryn to tme or hs clent the

bes corpus mtter lso ths Court beleves tt te ct

tht the Respondent souhtwth no coercon or nput rom ts

Courtn Order o Removls tntmount to wv hs rht o

ppel See 8 C Secton 2404(nlty o rde Theorder o the Irton Jude shl become nl n ccordce

wt Secton 009 o ths chpter nd 009 o 8 C

sttes tht cept when certed to te Bord te decson othe rton Jude becomes nl upo wver o ppel or upon

exprton o te tme to ppel no ppel s tke wchever

occurs rst In ts Court's estmto the ct tt the

Respondet specclly sked or n Order o Removl s

tntmount to wv s rt to ppe

The Respodent lso bndoned hs pplcton or ree

uder te Coventon st Torture O uust the t 20 0

29 04 07 8 ovember 8 200


13/15

the Reonent wa eciicay to to ie an aication, yet

the Reonent aie to o t no tie i the Reonent ie

an aication. The Reonent i not ie an aication with

thi Cort. On Seteer the 30th, 2010, when the Reonent

reqete a reoa ore7 he i ot it an -89 acation

or ay, withhoin or reie ner the Conention ant

Tortre. Thereore, thi Cort conce that the Reonent

aanone any or o reie he ay hae ha There are thereore

no aication n which thi Cort can reiew. The ren o

roo i on the aicant to etaih withhoin o reoa

ner either Section 241 () (3) o te ct or the Conention

aint Tortre See 8 C. F. R. Section 1208. (a) , () an (c)

There ein no aication to reiew thi Cort wi once aain

ie a ary orer reoin the Reonent to hi natie

contry o Kenya

ORER

IT S ORERE that the Reonent e reoe to hi

natie contry o Kenya

Je

29 043 10 9 oeber 18, 2010


14/15

Ir-.

I

CETIFICTE PGE

(

I heeby cetfy tht the ttched poceedng befoe

ESS CLEMENTE n the mtte of

ICHAR MCHREKA NAMWNGE

04 10

ok Pennsyn

ws held s heen ppes nd tht ths s the ogn

tnscpt theeof fo the fle of te Eecte Offce fo

Igton eew

ep/seh

hond E Pest, Tnscbe

OK STENOGAP HC SERCS INC4 Noth Geoge Steetok Pennsyln 401-661 85-

ecembe 6 00Completon te


15/15

YAMWAGE RICHARD MICHREKAA# 029043107 (IMATE# HM575)1120 PIKE STREET, PO BOX 999HUTIGDO PA 16652

US Deparme sice

Executive Oce r Iigraion Review

Ba fmmgatn ppalsOc f th Cl

5 07 Lsburg Pik uit1000Fs hurh Vini 1204/

HS LT/York Co Prison/YOR3400 Concord RoadYork PA 17402

ame: YAMWAGE RICHARD MCHREKA A029043107

Date of this notice 3/14/2011

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision i the above-referenced case. This copy is beigprovded to you as a couresy Your attorney or represeatve has been served wit tsdeciso pursuant to 8 CF.R. 12925(a) I the atached decsio orders that you be removed

rom the Unted States or arms an Immigraton Judges decso orderig that yo beremoved, ay petto r revew o the attaced decision mus be filed with ad receved by theappropriate cor of appeals with 30 days o the date of the decson

Encosure

Pane MebesGran, Edward R.iebowitz Een CMulane, Hugh G

Sinceey

Donna CaChief Clerk

Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)

Documents

Transcript of Richard Michreka Nyamwange, A029 043 107 (BIA March 17, 2011)