Reward Management

20
Reward Management •Factor Comparison Method •Point Method •The Hay Job Evaluation System JOB EVALUATION

Transcript of Reward Management

Page 1: Reward Management

Reward ManagementReward Management•Factor Comparison Method•Point Method•The Hay Job Evaluation System

•Factor Comparison Method•Point Method•The Hay Job Evaluation System

JOB EVALUATIONJOB EVALUATION

Page 2: Reward Management

Factor Comparison MethodFactor Comparison Method• A scientific method designed to rank job roles

based on a breakdown of factors rather than the role as a whole.

• The ultimate goal of factor comparison is to assign the relative parts of each job role a financial value.

Reward Management: Factor Comparison Method

Page 3: Reward Management

Factor Comparison MethodFactor Comparison Method

• Breaks down a job into a small

number of key factors, such as

skills, effort, knowledge,

responsibilities, and working conditions.

Reward Management: Factor Comparison Method

Page 4: Reward Management

G G A A M M EE

Page 5: Reward Management

Effort

Page 6: Reward Management

Communication Skill

Page 7: Reward Management

Responsibility

Page 8: Reward Management

Leadership Skill

Page 9: Reward Management

Working Condition

Page 10: Reward Management

Example

Reward Management: Factor Comparison Method

Page 11: Reward Management

ADVANTAGES:• The value of job is

expressed in monetary terms.

• Can be applied to a wide range of jobs.

• Can be applied to newly created jobs.

Reward Management: Factor Comparison Method

DISADVANTAGES:• Difficult to understand,

explain and operate.• Its use of the same

criteria to asses all jobs is questionable as jobs differ across and within organizations.

• Time consuming and costly.

Page 12: Reward Management

Point MethodPoint Method

• The point method is an extension of the factor comparison method.

• Points are assigned to each factor after prioritizing each factor in order of importance.

Reward Management: Point Method

Page 13: Reward Management

The procedure may be explained thus:1. Select key jobs. Identify the factors common

to all the identified jobs such as skill, effort, responsibility, among others.

2. Divide each major factor into number of subfactors. Each subfactor is defined and expressed clearly in the order of importance, preferably along a scale.

Reward Management: Point Method

Page 14: Reward Management

The most frequent factors employed in point systems are:

1.Skill2.Responsibility/ Accountability3.Effort

Reward Management: Point Method

Page 15: Reward Management

JOB FACTORS Percentage Weights Equivalent Points

I. SKILL 30 300

A. Technical SkillsB. Interpersonal SkillsC. Managerial Skills

51015

5010

150

II. EFFORT 20 200

A. Mental EffortB. Work Pressure

155

15050

III. RESPONSIBILITY 50 500

A. Impact on OperationsB. Responsibility over PeopleC. Responsibility over Company Assets

251510

250150100

TOTAL 100% 1,000 ptsReward Management: Point Method

Page 16: Reward Management

ADVANTAGES:• Forces raters to look into all key

factors and sub-factors of a job.• Point values are assigned to all

factors in a systematic way eliminating bias at every stage.

• The methodology contributes to a minimum of rating errors.

DISADVANTAGES:• It is complex• Time consuming

Reward Management: Point Method

Page 17: Reward Management

The Hay Job Evaluation SystemThe Hay Job Evaluation System

• It is the most sophisticated method of evaluating jobs jobs based in the point factor approach.

• It evaluates a JOB, not people who are working on that specific job.

• It is not based on performance, education, skills or current salary.

Reward Management: The Hay Job Evaluation System

Page 18: Reward Management

A Hay job evaluation is comprised of:• the knowledge required to do the job whether practical or intellectual (Know HowKnow How)• the kind of thinking required to solve

the problems which the job commonly faces (Problem SolvingProblem Solving)

• the responsibilities assigned (AccountabilityAccountability)

• the work environment in which the job is performed (Working ConditionsWorking Conditions)

Page 19: Reward Management

• ‘Know How’ is defined as the "sum total of every kind of knowledge and skill, however, acquired, needed for acceptable job performance."

• ‘Problem Solving’ is "the amount and nature of the thinking required in the job in the form of analyzing, reasoning, evaluating, creating, using judgment, forming hypotheses, drawing inferences, arriving at conclusions, etc."

• ‘Accountability’ is "the answerability for action and its consequences. The measured effect of the job on end results in the organization."

• ‘Working Conditions’ assess the environment in which the job is performed.

Page 20: Reward Management

Thank You

Ana Olmedo

REWARD MANAGEMENT>Factor Comparison Method >Point Method >The Hay Job Evaluation System